Agreement between routinely used immunoassays for thyroid function testing in non-pregnant and pregnant adults.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid function tests are common biochemical analyses, and agreement between the routinely used immunoassays is important for diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Efforts are continuously made to align the biochemical assays, and we aimed to evaluate the agreement between immunoassays used in a clinical laboratory setting among non-pregnant and pregnant adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Serum samples were obtained from 192 blood donors (non-pregnant adults) and from 86 pregnant women in the North Denmark Region with no known thyroid disease. MEASUREMENTS: Each sample was used for measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with the routinely used automatic immunoassays in the regional Departments of Clinical Biochemistry (Alinity, Abbott Laboratories, Cobas, Roche Diagnostics, and Atellica, Siemens Healthineers) and reported as the median with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: In nonpregnant adults, the level of TSH was higher with Cobas and Atellica than with Alinity as reflected by median (Alinity: 1.39 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.30-1.51 mIU/L); Cobas: 1.57 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.48-1.75 mIU/L); Atellica: 1.74 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.61-1.83 mIU/L)). Similarly, a trend was seen towards higher median TSH with Cobas than with Alinity among pregnant women (Alinity: 1.90 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.37-2.82 mIU/L); Cobas: 2.33 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.69-3.62 mIU/L)). CONCLUSION: Results of thyroid function tests obtained with different immunoassays were not interchangeable when evaluated among pregnant and non-pregnant adults. The distinct differences are relevant for clinical decision making and emphasize the necessity of clinical laboratory information when different assays are used for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with thyroid disease.

Diagnoses of obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease: a Danish validation study.

Different diagnoses of thyroid disease are available in the 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), but the validity of diagnoses related to obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease is unknown. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the North Denmark Region with a diagnosis of postpartum thyroiditis (PPT) (ICD-10: O905) from 2016 to 2019 or obstetric thyroid disease in 2019 (ICD-10: O992B (hypothyroidism) or O992C (hyperthyroidism)) registered in the Danish National Hospital Register. Information from nationwide registers and medical records were used to assess the validity. Among patients with an O905-diagnosis (n = 40), abnormal thyroid function test results were seen in all cases. A total of eight patients (20.0%) were positive for thyrotropin receptor antibodies postpartum, however, in low titers, and PPT was verified in 39 of 40 cases (97.5%). Altogether 45 of 50 patients with an O992B-diagnosis (90.0%) correctly had hypothyroidism, whereas hyperthyroidism was found in 25 of 39 patients with an O992C-diagnosis (64.1%). This is the first study to validate ICD-10 diagnoses of obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease. A high validity was seen for PPT (O905) and obstetric hypothyroidism (O992B), whereas for obstetric hyperthyroidism (O992C), the diagnosis could not be verified in one third of the cases.

Hyperthyroidism in pregnancy: design and methodology of a Danish multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Graves' disease (GD) is the main cause of hyperthyroidism in women of the fertile age. In pregnant women, the disease should be carefully managed and controlled to prevent maternal and fetal complications. Observational studies provide evidence of the adverse effects of untreated hyperthyroidism in pregnancy and have in more recent years substantiated a risk of teratogenic side effects with the use of antithyroid drugs (ATDs). These findings have challenged the clinical recommendations regarding the choice of treatment when patients become pregnant. To extend observational findings and support future clinical practice, a systematic collection of detailed clinical data in and around pregnancy is needed. METHODS: With the aim of collecting clinical and biochemical data, a Danish multicenter study entitled 'Pregnancy Investigations on Thyroid Disease' (PRETHYR) was initiated in 2021. We here describe the design and methodology of the first study part of PRETHYR. This part focuses on maternal hyperthyroidism and recruits female patients in Denmark with a past or present diagnosis of GD, who become pregnant, as well as women who are treated with ATDs in the pregnancy, irrespective of the underlying etiology. The women are included during clinical management from endocrine hospital departments in Denmark, and study participation includes patient questionnaires in pregnancy and postpartum as well as review of medical records from the mother and the child. RESULTS: Data collection was initiated on November 1, 2021 and covered all five Danish Regions from March 1, 2022. Consecutive study inclusion will continue, and we here report the first status of inclusion. As of November 1, 2022, a total of 62 women have been included in median pregnancy week 19 (interquartile range (IQR): 10-27) with a median maternal age of 31.4 years (IQR: 28.5-35.1). At inclusion, 26 women (41.9%) reported current use of thyroid medication; ATDs (n = 14), Levothyroxine (n = 12). CONCLUSION: This report describes a newly established systematic and nationwide collection of detailed clinical data on pregnant women with hyperthyroidism and their offspring. Considering the course and relatively low prevalence of GD in pregnant women, such nationwide design is essential to establish a sufficiently large cohort.