Routine measurement of plasma chromogranin B has limited clinical utility in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

OBJECTIVE: Chromogranin A (CgA) and B (CgB) are markers for monitoring disease status in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). These are specialized diagnostic tests often necessitating referral of specimens to a supraregional assay service (SAS) laboratory for analysis. The aim of this audit was to assess whether measurement of either plasma CgA or CgB alone provides sufficient clinical information in comparison with the current practice of measuring both markers together. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was undertaken for all chromogranin tests requested for patients with a known NET diagnosis. Results were categorized based on whether plasma concentrations were elevated for one or both CgA and CgB. RESULTS: A total of 325 sequential patients with a NET diagnosis had plasma chromogranin levels measured during the period of review. Baseline CgA was elevated in 60·9% of patients. Isolated elevations in CgA (with normal CgB) were found in 44·9% of patients, whilst combined elevations in both CgA and CgB were found in 16% of patients. Combined CgA and CgB concentrations within the normal range were observed for 38·5% of patients. Only two patients (0·6%) had an isolated elevation in CgB at baseline. Both patients had a diagnosis of pancreatic NET and were radiologically stable. Plasma CgA and CgB corresponded with disease stage (localized vs metastatic). CgB in addition to CgA did not provide any significant improvement in diagnostic performance for identification of metastatic disease compared to CgA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this NET population and specific assay performance characteristics, CgA alone provides sufficient information for the management of NET patients; the routine estimation of CgB in all patients is not informative in clinical practice.

Proopiomelanocortin interference in the measurement of adrenocorticotrophic hormone: a United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service study.

OBJECTIVE: It is recognized that measurement of ACTH-precursor peptides including proopiomelanocortin (POMC) has clinical utility in identifying the aetiology of Cushing's syndrome. Recent data have also demonstrated cross-reactivity of POMC in ACTH immunoassays used in clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to assess the cross-reactivity of POMC in the main commercial immunoassays for ACTH and to survey the awareness of laboratory professionals to this potential interference. METHOD: To assess cross-reactivity, specimens containing ACTH and/or POMC were prepared by the UK National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS) [Edinburgh]. A separate interpretative exercise was also sent to participating laboratories. RESULTS: Eighty-seven laboratories measured 'total' ACTH (i.e. ACTH and/or POMC) in their assays. Cross-reactivity of POMC varied from a mean of 1·6-4·7% (reflected in a large percentage increase in measured ACTH of up to 261% due to POMC cross-reactivity) depending on the manufacturer. Major differences in the clinical interpretation of test results were observed in returned responses to the interpretative exercise. CONCLUSION: An appraisal of POMC cross-reactivity in currently available ACTH immunoassays has been achieved. Cross-reactivity was sufficient to detect ACTH precursors at concentrations that could be found in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. These data will assist laboratories in interpreting results when assessing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Endocrinologists and laboratory professionals should be aware of the degree of cross-reactivity in ACTH immunoassay in order to minimize the risk of misinterpretation of results and/or potentially delayed treatment.

Serum regulates cortisol bioactivity by corticosteroid-binding globulin-dependent and independent mechanisms, as revealed by combined bioassay and physicochemical assay approaches.

CONTEXT: Corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) is the principal carrier of natural glucocorticoids in the circulation, and we hypothesized that it modulates glucocorticoid bioactivity (GBA). Alterations in CBG, the presence of noncortisol, naturally occurring glucocorticoids and the use of potent, synthetic glucocorticoids, all make it difficult to assess adrenal activity in-vivo; these problems can be addressed by a glucocorticoid bioassay. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A bioassay was developed for serum GBA and a physicochemical ultrafiltration-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for free serum cortisol (FreeF). We studied individuals homozygous and heterozygous for a nonfunctioning CBG variant (CBG G237V) and healthy controls. RESULTS: FreeF concentrations were similar in healthy controls, and those with absent functional CBG, but surprisingly we found low GBA in CBG null individuals. This may suggest that CBG delivers cortisol to target cells. However, further experiments revealed that dilution of serum in the bioassay caused release of cortisol from CBG, resulting in elevated GBA measurements in all but the CBG G237V homozygotes. Furthermore, we identified a specific and potent inhibitory effect of high concentration serum on glucocorticoid sensitivity of the recipient cells used in the bioassay. Analysis of inflammatory synovial fluid, a filtrate of serum with lower CBG concentration, revealed elevated free cortisol compared to noninflammatory synovial fluid, a change not attributable to interconversion between cortisol and cortisone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that dilution of CBG enhances cortisol release, and so bioactivity, and also that serum potently induces glucocorticoid resistance in target cells.

Corticosteroid-binding globulin regulates cortisol pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) is the principal carrier for cortisol in the circulation. Variations in CBG-binding capacity are predicted to alter total serum cortisol disposition, but free serum cortisol is believed to be unaffected. Unbound cortisol pharmacokinetics (PK) have not been studied in the context of CBG changes. We aimed to assess the regulation of cortisol PK by CBG. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Women on oestrogens [oral contraceptive pill, (OCP)], patients homozygous for a nonfunctioning CBG variant (CBG null) and healthy controls (HV) were studied before and after IV and oral administration of hydrocortisone 20 mg. MEASUREMENTS: PK parameters were studied for total serum cortisol (SerF), free serum cortisol (FreeF) and cortisone (FreeE), and salivary cortisol (SalF) and cortisone (SalE): area under the curve (AUC), clearance (CL), half-life and volume of distribution (V(d)). RESULTS: Following IV hydrocortisone, AUC and half-life of SerF were significantly higher in the OCP group and lower in the CBG null. SerF CL and V(d) were significantly lower in the OCP group and increased in the CBG null, compared to HV. PK parameters for FreeF and the salivary biomarkers were not different between the CBG null and HV, although OCP patients still had higher AUC compared to HV and prolonged half-life. These findings were confirmed following oral hydrocortisone, but concentration-time profiles were highly heterogeneous and SalF interpretation was problematic because of oral contamination. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that CBG has a distinct effect on cortisol PK. When CBG binding is disrupted, FreeF retains normal PK characteristics, although CBG null patients lack a CBG-bound pool of readily releasable cortisol. Women on oestrogens may have altered free serum cortisol kinetics and thus may be potentially overexposed to glucocorticoids.

Current management practices for acromegaly: an international survey.

To determine whether peer-reviewed consensus statements have changed clinical practice, we surveyed acromegaly care in specialist centers across the globe, and determined the degree of adherence to published consensus guidelines on acromegaly management. Sixty-five acromegaly experts who participated in the 7th Acromegaly Consensus Workshop in March 2009 responded. Results indicated that the most common referring sources for acromegaly patients were other endocrinologists (in 26% of centers), neurosurgeons (25%) and primary care physicians (21%). In sixty-nine percent of patients, biochemical diagnoses were made by evaluating results of a combination of growth hormone (GH) nadir/basal GH and elevated insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. In both Europe and the USA, neurosurgery was the treatment of choice for GH-secreting microadenomas and for macroadenomas with compromised visual function. The most widely used criteria for neurosurgical outcome assessment were combined measurements of IGF-I and GH levels after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3 months after surgery. Ninety-eight percent of respondents stated that primary treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) was indicated at least sometime during the management of acromegaly patients. In nearly all centers (96%), the use of pegvisomant monotherapy was restricted to patients who had failed to achieve biochemical control with SRL therapy. The observation that most centers followed consensus statement recommendations encourages the future utility of these workshops aimed to create uniform management standards for acromegaly.

Long-term experience of pegvisomant therapy as a treatment for acromegaly.

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pegvisomant as a treatment for acromegaly. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical and trial data from all patients treated with pegvisomant since 1997 at two centres with common protocols. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (age range 27-78 years) have been treated with pegvisomant since 1997 for up to 91 months (median 18 months). Before commencing pegvisomant, patients had an IGF-I above the upper limit of normal (ULN) of the age-related reference range (median 1.8 x ULN, range 1.2-4.1). Ninety-five per cent normalized IGF-I using a median dose of 15 mg daily (range 10 mg alternate day to 60 mg daily) with no influence of gender on dose requirement. Five patients had combination therapy with either somatostatin analogues (SSA) or cabergoline. Two patients initially controlled on 10 mg and 20 mg required dose increases (to 20 mg + 40 mg) over 24 months to reduce IGF-I. Twenty-seven patients stopped pegvisomant. Reasons included side-effects [abnormal liver function tests (LFTs)] and patient choice. Two patients developed elevated liver transaminases, which normalized on stopping pegvisomant. Patients had 6-12-monthly pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. One patient had significant tumour size increase. CONCLUSION: This long-term experience in 57 patients indicates pegvisomant to be effective, safe and well-tolerated. Raised transaminases occurred within the first month of therapy in two patients, and tumour growth was seen in one patient (tumour was growing prior to pegvisomant). In two patients increasing doses of pegvisomant were required to keep IGF-I within the target range.

Use of a GH receptor antagonist (GHRA) to explore the relationship between GH and IGF-I in adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE: At diagnosis, approximately 50% of adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) have an IGF-I within the reference range. It is unclear whether in such patients serum IGF-I levels are regulated by factors other than GH. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to investigate the effect of the GH receptor antagonist - pegvisomant (20 mg daily for 14 days) on GH and IGF-I levels in three cohorts: patients with GHD and a normal IGF-I (NORMS); patients with GHD and a low IGF-I (LOWS) and healthy volunteers (CONS). RESULTS: Pegvisomant decreased IGF-I in CONS and NORMS [158.5 (101-206) vs. 103 (77-125) microg/l, P < 0.01; 124 (81-136) vs. 95 (51-113) microg/l, P < 0.01 respectively], but not in LOWS [31 (< 31-32) vs. 34.5 (< 31-38) microg/l], and this was associated with an increase in mean 24 h GH in CONS [0.49 (0.12-0.89) to 1.38 (0.22-2.45) microg/l (P = 0.03)] and in NORMS [69 (0-320)% from 0.1 (< 0.1-0.13) to 0.17 (0.11-0.42) microg/l (P = 0.03)], but not in the LOWS. The peak GH response to arginine was increased by pegvisomant in CONS and NORMS [6.1 (0.8-9) vs. 20.4 (13.1-28.8) microg/l, P = 0.03; 0.4 (0.1-0.5) vs. 0.5 (0.3-0.6) microg/l, respectively], but not in LOWS. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that patients with severe GHD with a normal IGF-I are able to increase GH secretion in response to a pegvisomant-induced fall in IGF-I, whereas those with low IGF-I levels are unable to increase GH secretion. Therefore circulating IGF-I appears to be GH-independent in GHD patients with a low IGF-I, but remains partially GH-dependent in GHD patients with a normal IGF-I.

Growth hormone receptor antagonists: discovery, development, and use in patients with acromegaly.

An understanding of the events that occur during GH receptor (GHR) signaling has facilitated the development of a GHR antagonist (pegvisomant) for use in humans. This molecule has been designed to compete with native GH for the GHR and to prevent its proper or functional dimerization-a process that is critical for GH signal transduction and IGF-I synthesis and secretion. Clinical trials in patients with acromegaly show GHR blockade to be an exciting new mode of therapy for this condition, and pegvisomant may have a therapeutic role in diseases, such as diabetes and malignancy, in which abnormalities of the GH/IGF-I axis have been observed. This review charts the discovery and development of GHR antagonists and details the experience gained in patients with acromegaly.

Wide variation in surgical outcomes for acromegaly in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: Unsuccessful surgery for acromegaly has major consequences for the patient as well as financial consequences for the National Health Service (NHS). Surgical expertise affects the outcome. We have used the UK National Acromegaly Register to assess surgical outcomes in different centres to investigate whether these match the previously published case series. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective observational study by analysis of anonymized national computer register records derived from individual clinical case records from 22 UK endocrine units and their associated pituitary surgical services. PATIENTS: Cases of acromegaly, presenting in 1970-2004, with levels of GH or IGF-1 (785 and 430 cases, respectively) recorded prior to transsphenoidal adenomectomy and in the 12 months postsurgery, before any subsequent pituitary surgery or radiotherapy. GH-lowering pharmacological therapy was permitted only if suspended for biochemical testing. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of cases with 'safe' mean postoperative GH levels (< 5 mU/l) and/or IGF-1 in the age- and sex-adjusted normal range. RESULTS: 'Safe' GH, normal IGF-1, or both was achieved for 26%, 29% and 20% of extrasellar macroadenomas (> 1 cm), respectively, 39%, 39% and 29% of intrasellar macroadenomas, 56%, 51% and 37% of microadenomas (< 1 cm) and 39%, 39% and 28% of cases overall. In centres contributing more than 10 patients' data, rates of safe GH levels ranged from 20% to 68% and IGF-1 from 19% to 55%. Success rates in attaining safe postsurgical levels of GH improved only slightly in the UK between 1974 and 1999 but markedly thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcomes for acromegaly in UK centres vary widely and historically have not, except in a few centres, matched those of large published series, which mostly have a success rate around 60%. Results have, however, improved substantially since 2000 and in the most successful units match those of the best published series. Experience is an important determinant of surgical success in acromegaly and the very recent improvement in surgical results in the UK coincides with a trend to concentrate pituitary surgery in the hands of a smaller number of specialists. Therefore, patients should be offered surgery by a dedicated pituitary surgeon with a caseload sufficient to offer the prospect of safe postsurgical GH and IGF-1 levels for the majority of cases.

Surgical debulking of pituitary macroadenomas causing acromegaly improves control by lanreotide.

BACKGROUND: Macroadenomas causing acromegaly are cured surgically in only around 50% of patients. Primary medical treatment with somatostatin analogues has been suggested to be a means of treating patients with a potentially poor surgical outcome. Previous retrospective studies have also suggested that surgical debulking of pituitary tumours causing acromegaly improves control by somatostatin analogues. No prospective study using lanreotide has been carried out thus far to assess whether this is the case. OBJECTIVE: We carried out a prospective study to assess whether surgical debulking of pituitary macroadenomas causing acromegaly improved the subsequent control of acromegaly by the somatostatin analogue lanreotide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 26 consecutive patients [10 males and 16 females--median age 53.5 years (range 22-70)] with macroadenoma causing acromegaly unselected for somatostatin response for 16 weeks with lanreotide, maximizing GH and IGF-I suppression, if necessary, by incremental dosing. Surgical resection was carried out and the patients were re-assessed off medical treatment at 16 weeks following surgery. Those with nadir GH > 2 mU/l in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a mean GH in the GH day curve (GHDC) > 5 mU/l were subsequently restarted on lanreotide and the responses were assessed at the same time points as during the preoperative lanreotide treatment. RESULTS: GH values fell on lanreotide treatment and prior to surgery they were considered 'safe' (mean GH in GHDC < 5 mU/l) in eight patients (30.7%). After surgery, they were 'safe' in 18 patients (69.2%). The figures for normal IGF-I were 11 (42.3%) before surgery and 23 (88.5%) after surgery. After surgery, six patients had nadir GH > 2 mU/l in the OGTT and 'unsafe' GH levels (mean GH in GHDC > 5 mU/l); on re-exposure to lanreotide, GH levels fell in all patients and at the end of 16 weeks postsurgery, they were 'safe' in three of them (50%) (P < 0.05). Pituitary tumour volume was also assessed prospectively, preoperatively on lanreotide and showed a mean fall of 33.1%. Eighty-three percent of patients had > 20% shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective study using lanreotide, surgical debulking of pituitary tumours causing acromegaly improved subsequent postoperative control by the somatostatin analogue lanreotide. Surgery should, therefore, be considered in patients with macroadenoma causing acromegaly, even if there is little prospect of surgical cure. Lanreotide causes significant pituitary tumour shrinkage in the majority of patients.

SOCIETY FOR ENDOCRINOLOGY ENDOCRINE EMERGENCY GUIDANCE: Acute management of the endocrine complications of checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Immunotherapy treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) (CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) significantly improves survival in a number of cancers. Treatment can be limited by immune-mediated adverse effects including endocrinopathies such as hypophysitis, adrenalitis, thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus. If endocrinopathies (particularly hypocortisolemia) are not recognized early, they can be fatal. The diagnosis and management of endocrinopathies can be complicated by simultaneous multi-organ immune adverse effects. Here, we present Endocrine Emergency Guidance for the acute management of the endocrine complications of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the first specialty-specific guidance with Endocrinology, Oncology and Acute Medicine input and endorsed by the Society for Endocrinology Clinical Committee. We present algorithms for management: endocrine assessment and management of patients in the first 24 hours who present life-threateningly unwell (CTCAE grade 3-4) and the appropriate management of mild-moderately unwell patients (CTCAE grade 1-2) presenting with features compatible with an endocrinopathy. Other important considerations in relation to hypohysitis and the maintenance of glucocorticoid therapy are discussed.

Pegvisomant interference in GH assays results in underestimation of GH levels.

INTRODUCTION: Pegvisomant use in acromegaly negates the use of GH levels to monitor disease activity. To achieve antagonism, plasma concentrations must be approximately 1000-fold greater than GH which with the high homology between the peptides makes GH measurement a challenge when pegvisomant is present. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of pegvisomant on GH measured using commercially available assays. METHODS: Pooled serum samples with GH concentrations <0.38, 3.85 and 7.69 microg/l were spiked with increasing pegvisomant concentrations (9000-494 000 microg/l). Samples were analysed by the Nichols Advantage, DPC Immulite 2000, Diasorin IRMA, Beckman Access Dxl, Tosoh AIA and Wallac Delfia assays. RESULTS: With baseline GH <0.38 microg/l measured levels were <0.38 in all assays except Nichols, Diasorin and Beckman where GH peaked at 1.5, 9.6 and 17.7 micarog/l respectively at low pegvisomant concentrations, falling thereafter. With the other two samples, measured GH levels progressively fell with increasing pegvisomant concentrations, except the Beckman assay where an increase (30.8 microg/l) was seen at a pegvisomant concentration of 9000 microg/l; and Diasorin and Tosoh where smaller increases were seen at lower pegvisomant concentrations, levels gradually falling thereafter. CONCLUSION: The presence of pegvisomant resulted in artefactually low measured GH in most assays. We speculate this fall is due to assay antibody-binding pegvisomant, reducing the amount of available antibody to bind actual GH thereby producing less sandwich formation: the 'high-dose hook' effect. In most assays, this effect is modest and results in lower GH, but the level of interference makes them unsuitable for studies on the influence of pegvisomant on GH neuroregulation.

Silent growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: IGF-1 is not sufficient to exclude growth hormone excess.

Circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is increasingly being used as a screening test and in ongoing monitoring of treated acromegaly. We here present three cases of women (two of whom were on the oestrogen containing contraceptive pill at the time of presentation) who had normal circulating IGF-1 and no overt clinical features of acromegaly at the time of their pituitary surgery. Postoperatively, all were confirmed to have growth hormone excess in keeping with the presence of active somatotroph pituitary adenomas. We suggest that for optimal patient management, formal evaluation of growth hormone status with oral glucose tolerance testing should ideally be performed on all individuals for whom pituitary surgery is planned.

Affective alterations in patients with Cushing's syndrome in remission are associated with decreased BDNF and cortisone levels.

OBJECTIVE: Affective alterations and poorer quality of life often persist in patients with Cushing's syndrome (CS) in remission. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) and is highly expressed in brain areas controlling mood and response to stress. Our aims were to assess affective alterations after long-term remission of CS and evaluate whether they are associated with serum BDNF, salivary cortisol (SalF) and/or cortisone (SalE) concentrations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six CS patients in remission (32 females/4 males; mean age (±s.d.), 48.8 ± 11.8 years; median duration of remission, 72 months) and 36 gender-, age- and BMI-matched controls were included. Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and EuroQoL and CushingQoL questionnaires were completed and measured to evaluate anxiety, depression, stress perception and quality of life (QoL) respectively. Salivary cortisol was measured using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/TMS). BDNF was measured in serum using an ELISA. RESULTS: Remitted CS patients showed worse scores in all questionnaires than controls: STAI (P < 0.001), BDI (P < 0.001), CES-D (P < 0.001), PANAS (P < 0.01), PSS (P < 0.01) and EuroQoL (P < 0.01). A decrease in BDNF was observed in CS vs controls (P = 0.038), and low BDNF was associated with more anxiety (r = -0.247, P = 0.037), depression (r = -0.249, P = 0.035), stress (r = -0.277, P = 0.019) and affective balance (r = 0.243, P = 0.04). Morning salivary cortisone was inversely associated with trait anxiety (r = -0.377, P = 0.040) and depressed affect (r = -0.392, P = 0.032) in CS patients. Delay to diagnosis was associated with depressive symptoms (BDI-II: r = 0.398, P = 0.036 and CES-D: r = 0.449, P = 0.017) and CushingQoL scoring (r = -0.460, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low BDNF levels are associated with affective alterations in 'cured' CS patients, including depression, anxiety and impaired stress perception. Elevated levels of SalE might also be related to poor affective status in these patients.

Reductions of circulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels after treatment with pegvisomant in subjects with acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is involved in activation of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) system; the latter is implicated in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Patients with acromegaly have reduced life expectancy primarily due to cardiac disease. AIM: This study assessed plasma MMPs and VEGF levels in patients with active acromegaly (IGF-I > 130% upper limit of normal), and on treatment with pegvisomant. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients [nine female, mean age 56.1 +/- 13.8 yr (mean +/- sd)] were studied at baseline and on pegvisomant therapy and compared with data from 25 healthy volunteers (12 female; 56.6 +/- 14.2 yr). Plasma MMP-2, MMP-9, and VEGF levels were measured. RESULTS: Serum IGF-I fell from a baseline (mean +/- sd) level of 620.1 +/- 209.3 ng/ml to 237.5 +/- 118.5 ng/ml on pegvisomant (doses 10-60 mg; P < 0.001). MMP-2 levels at baseline were significantly higher in patients compared with healthy controls (380.7 +/- 204.8 vs. 207.4 +/- 62.6 ng/ml; P < 0.001), but with treatment a significant reduction in MMP-2 [380.7 +/- 204.8 vs. 203.0 +/- 77.4 ng/ml; P < 0.001] and VEGF (283.4 +/- 233.6 vs. 229.1 +/- 157.4 pg/ml; P = 0.008) was noted. There was no significant difference in MMP-9 levels between patients and controls at baseline (797.5 +/- 142.1 vs. 788.3 +/- 218.0 ng/ml; P = 0.87) or between baseline and posttreatment levels (797.5 +/- 142.1 vs. 780.0 +/- 214 ng/ml; P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel data demonstrate that treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant leads to reductions in MMP-2 and VEGF concentrations. Further studies are required to determine the significance of these findings with relation to cardiac disease.

Effect of growth hormone in an experimental model of protein hypercatabolism induced by glucocorticoids.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to evaluate whether growth hormone could be beneficial in a model of hypercatabolism induced by glucocorticoids and to examine its effects on ACTH, corticosterone and IGF-1 levels. The effects of growth hormone on the expression of both glucocorticoid receptor and tyrosine aminotransferase were also evaluated. METHODS: Fifty Wistar rats were divided into five groups and treated as follows: (A) daily subcutaneous injection of growth hormone (4.8 IU/kg/day) and oral placebo, (B) daily injection of placebo and oral dexamethasone (3 mg/kg/day), (C) daily injection of growth hormone and oral dexamethasone, (D) daily injection of placebo and oral placebo, and (E) no treatment. The animals were decapitated seven days after initiating treatment. RESULTS: Growth hormone did not modify the weight loss induced by dexamethasone. Glucocorticoid receptor expression was significantly lower in group A than in group E. An increase in tyrosine aminotransferase was observed in group C. CONCLUSION: Growth hormone did not exert any beneficial effect in this model of hypercatabolism. Growth hormone decreased glucocorticoid receptor expression. This fact could explain its beneficial effect when protein hypercatabolism is not the predominant phenomenon. Growth hormone induced the hyperexpression of tyrosine aminotransferase, thus suggesting an amplifying effect on the glucocorticoid action.

Disease activity in acromegaly may be assessed 6 weeks after discontinuation of pegvisomant.

OBJECTIVE: Pegvisomant, a modified growth hormone (GH) molecule, is a novel medical therapy for acromegaly that functions as a GH receptor antagonist. Serum GH cannot be used as a marker of disease activity in patients taking this form of therapy, partly because GH levels rise on pegvisomant and partly because the drug cross-reacts with many routine GH assays. The purpose of this study was to assess the time for which it is necessary to discontinue pegvisomant prior to biochemical reassessment of acromegaly. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 13 patients (seven male, median age 61 years, range 43-77) enrolled in two separate, open-label studies of the efficacy and tolerability of pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly. All had been taking a stable dose of pegvisomant (median dose 15 mg daily, range 10-30) as monotherapy for at least 3 months before discontinuing the drug. After discontinuation of pegvisomant, serum IGF-I was measured at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks in all patients. Serum GH (single sample) was measured in nine patients at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, but not at baseline on account of the cross-reactivity of pegvisomant with the GH assay. RESULTS: Mean serum IGF-I rose from 210+/-105 ng/ml (S.D.) at baseline to 392+/-175 ng/ml at 2 weeks after discontinuation of pegvisomant (P < 0.0001). Although there was no statistically significant change in mean serum IGF-I beyond 2 weeks (412+/-181, 392+/-152 and 399+/-150ng/ml at 4, 6 and 8 weeks respectively; P = 0.13 (2 vs 4 weeks), 0.31 (4 vs 6 weeks) and 0.46 (6 vs 8 weeks), serum IGF-I rose by more than twice the interassay coefficient of variation (CV) in two of the 13 patients between weeks 2 and 4. The standard deviation of the difference in serum IGF-I between time points was calculated. The values declined from 118% (weeks 0-2) 17%, 19.7% and 10% (weeks 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 respectively). The expected measure if there was no systematic change in base would be 15% (1.4 x interassay CV). Mean serum GH was virtually unchanged at 2-8 weeks after cessation of pegvisomant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the activity of acromegaly may be assessed by serum IGF-I levels 6 weeks after the discontinuation of pegvisomant.

Cushing's syndrome: difficulties in diagnosis.

Establishment of the precise cause in a patient with Cushing's syndrome remains a major clinical challenge. The following case of a female patient with cyclical Cushing's syndrome illustrates how recent advances such as the introduction of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test (in determining the cause of ACTH production) and high-resolution computed tomographic scanning may help in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. As this case study illustrates, precise diagnosis requires thorough initial investigation and possible successive testing.

Clinical use of a growth hormone receptor antagonist in the treatment of acromegaly.

The elucidation of the mechanisms by which growth hormone (GH) interacts with its receptor has facilitated the design of compounds that function as GH-receptor antagonists. One such compound, B2036, has been conjugated to polyethylene glycol to produce a drug, pegvisomant, that has a powerful ability to lower circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), the principal mediator of GH action, in patients with acromegaly and to improve the symptoms and signs associated with GH excess. This article describes the mechanism of action of GH-receptor antagonists, reviews the preclinical and clinical data on the use of pegvisomant and discusses some of the challenges that lie ahead in judging the efficacy of a treatment that, unlike established therapies for acromegaly, does not aim to modify the underlying cause of acromegaly, namely excess GH secretion, but aims to lower serum IGF-I levels to normal.

Pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly.

Epidemiological studies have highlighted the need for tight control of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in patients with acromegaly. Studies highlighting the events involved in GH receptor signaling have allowed the development of a pegylated GH receptor antagonist (pegvisomant) for use in humans, which has been designed to outcompete GH for the GH receptor, but which contains a position 120 amino acid substitution that prevents recruitment of a second GH receptor. This process of receptor dimerisation is crucial for signal transduction and IGF-I generation. Clinical trials of pegvisomant suggest it is the most effective treatment for acromegaly to date, as this therapy is capable of normalising serum IGF-I in up to 97% of patients when doses of 40 mg per day are used. This paper reviews the development of pegvisomant and the clinical experience in patients with acromegaly to date.