Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(5): 873-877, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While student-run free clinics (SRFCs) play an important role in care for underserved populations, few mechanisms exist to promote collaboration among regional SRFCs. AIMS: To address this gap, the Chicagoland Free Clinics Consortium (CFCC) was formed to (1) facilitate collaboration between Chicagoland SRFCs, (2) provide innovation grant funding, and (3) host an annual conference. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In 2018, students from the Pritzker School of Medicine founded the CFCC and partnered with peers from area schools to implement programming. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Between 2018 and 2022, CFCC engaged 23 SRFCs representing all 6 Chicagoland schools, held 4 annual conferences, and distributed $15,423 in grants to 19 projects at 14 SRFC sites. PROGRAM EVALUATION: A total of 176 students from 5 schools attended the 4 conferences. In 2022, 82 unique participants were surveyed, and 66% (54/82) responded. Eighty percent (43/54) reported they were "more likely to collaborate with other Chicagoland free clinics." In 2022, all grant sites were surveyed and 84% (16/19) responded. Most (87%,14/16) agreed the grant "allowed them to implement a project that would not have otherwise been accomplished" and 21% (4/19) were inter-institutional collaborations. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, CFCC is the first student-led organization to promote sustained collaboration across SRFCs in a metropolitan area.


Asunto(s)
Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes , Humanos , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Conducta Cooperativa , Área sin Atención Médica , Estudiantes de Medicina , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración
2.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 43: 477-501, 2022 04 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35020445

RESUMEN

Health care providers hold negative explicit and implicit biases against marginalized groups of people such as racial and ethnic minoritized populations. These biases permeate the health care system and affect patients via patient-clinician communication, clinical decision making, and institutionalized practices. Addressing bias remains a fundamental professional responsibility of those accountable for the health and wellness of our populations. Current interventions include instruction on the existence and harmful role of bias in perpetuating health disparities, as well as skills training for the management of bias. These interventions can raise awareness of provider bias and engage health care providers in establishing egalitarian goals for care delivery, but these changes are not sustained, and the interventions have not demonstrated change in behavior in the clinical or learning environment. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these interventions may be hampered by health care providers' work and learning environments, which are rife with discriminatory practices that sustain the very biases US health care professions are seeking to diminish. We offer a conceptual model demonstrating that provider-level implicit bias interventions should be accompanied by interventions that systemically change structures inside and outside the health care system if the country is to succeed in influencing biases and reducing health inequities.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud , Sesgo , Comunicación , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(9): 2156-2164, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically impacted medical student experiences. Little is known about the impact of the pandemic on student well-being and protective factors for burnout. OBJECTIVE: Assess US medical student burnout, stress, and loneliness during the initial phase of the pandemic, compare results to pre-pandemic data, and identify risk factors for distress and protective factors to inform support interventions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of medical students conducted between May and July 2020. PARTICIPANTS: 3826 students from 22 medical schools. MAIN MEASURES: Burnout (MBI-HSS), stress (PSS-10), loneliness (UCLA scale), and student experiences. Compared burnout and stress to pre-pandemic studies (2010-2020). KEY RESULTS: Of 12,389 students, 3826 responded (31%). Compared to pre-pandemic studies, burnout was lower (50% vs. 52%, P = 0.03) while mean stress was higher (18.9 vs. 16.0, P < 0.001). Half (1609/3247) reported high (≥ 6/9) loneliness scores. Significant differences were found in burnout and stress by class year (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001) and race (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001), with the highest levels in second- and third-year students and Black, Asian, or other racial minority students. Students experiencing financial strain or racism had higher burnout and stress (P < 0.001 for all). Respondents with COVID-19 diagnoses in themselves or family members had higher stress (P < 0.001). Nearly half (1756/3569) volunteered during the pandemic, with volunteers reporting lower burnout [48% (782/1639) vs. 52% (853/1656), P = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: While stress was higher compared to pre-pandemic data, burnout was significantly lower. Higher burnout and stress among Black, Asian, and other racial minority students and those who experienced financial strain, racism, or COVID-19 diagnoses likely reflect underlying racial and socioeconomic inequalities exacerbated by the pandemic and concurrent national racial injustice events. Volunteer engagement may be protective against burnout. Schools should proactively support vulnerable students during periods of stress.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Estudiantes de Medicina , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pandemias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Med Educ ; 53(9): 861-873, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106901

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Medicine is practised in complex systems. Physicians engage in clinical and operational problems that are dynamic and lack full transparency. As a consequence, the behaviour of medical systems and diseases is often unpredictable. Medical science has equipped physicians with powerful tools to favourably impact health, but a reductionist approach alone is insufficient to optimally address the complex challenges posed by illness and public health. Concepts from complexity science, such as continuous quality improvement and teamwork, strive to fill the gap between biomedical knowledge and the realities of practice. However, the superficial treatment of these systems-thinking concepts in medical education has distorted their implementation and undermined their impact. 'Systems thinking' has been conflated with 'systematic thinking'; concepts which are adaptive in nature are being taught as standardised, reductionist tools. METHODS: Using concepts from complexity science, the history of science and psychology, this problem is outlined and a theoretical model of professional development is proposed. RESULTS: This model proposes that complex problem solving and adaptive behaviour, not technical expertise, are distinguishing features of professionalism. DISCUSSION: The impact of this model on our understanding of physician autonomy, professionalism, teamwork and continuous quality improvement is discussed. This model has significant implications for the structure and content of medical education. Strategies for enhancing medical training, including interventions in recruitment, the curriculum and evaluation, are reviewed. Such adjustments would prepare trainees to more effectively utilise biomedical knowledge and tools in the complex high-stakes reality of medical practice.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/normas , Solución de Problemas , Análisis de Sistemas , Adaptación Psicológica , Curriculum/normas , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/normas , Competencia Profesional/normas , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología
10.
JAMA ; 323(20): 2022-2023, 2020 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453348
11.
Acad Med ; 2024 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042417

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The medical education community is pursuing reforms addressing unsustainable growth in the number of residency applications per applicant and application costs. Little research has examined the prevalence or contributions of parallel applications (application to residency in multiple specialties) to this growth. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of Electronic Residency Application Service® data provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges was conducted. The percentage of applicants applying to ≥1 specialty, mean number of specialties applied, number of submitted applications, and percentage of applicants to each specialty who were parallel applying were determined. MD, DO, and international (U.S. international medical graduate [IMG] and IMG) applicants were included. RESULTS: The sample contained 586,246 applicant records from 459,704 unique applicants. The percentage of applicants who parallel applied decreased from 41.3% to 35.4% between 2009 and 2021. DO applicants were the only group for whom the percentage parallel applying increased (30.6% vs. 32.1%). IMG (60.4% vs. 49.1%) or USIMG applicants (69.6% vs. 63.1%) were groups with the greatest percentage of applicants parallel applying each year (2009-2021). The mean number of specialties applied to when parallel applying also decreased from 2.96 in 2009 to 2.79 in 2021, overall. Between 2009 and 2021, mean number of applications increased for all applicant types amongst both single-specialty applicant and parallel-applying applicants. Among applicants who were single-specialty applying, mean number of applications grew from 38.6 in 2009 to 74.6 in 2021 and from 95.2 to 149.8 for parallel-applying applicants. CONCLUSIONS: All applicant groups experienced decreases in percentages parallel applying except for DO applicants. Parallel application appears to be common and slowly declining, and does not appear to significantly contribute to increasing numbers of applications per candidate. Efforts to control the growth of applications per applicant should continue to focus on applicants' numbers of applications submitted to each specialty.

12.
J Med Internet Res ; 15(5): e88, 2013 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23656727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While early reports highlight the benefits of tablet computing in hospitals, introducing any new technology can result in inflated expectations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare anticipated expectations of Apple iPad use and perceptions after deployment among residents. METHODS: 115 internal medicine residents received Apple iPads in October 2010. Residents completed matched surveys on anticipated usage and perceptions after distribution 1 month prior and 4 months after deployment. RESULTS: In total, 99% (114/115) of residents responded. Prior to deployment, most residents believed that the iPad would improve patient care and efficiency on the wards; however, fewer residents "strongly agreed" after deployment (34% vs 15% for patient care, P<.001; 41% vs 24% for efficiency, P=.005). Residents with higher expectations were more likely to report using the iPad for placing orders post call and during admission (71% vs 44% post call, P=.01, and 16% vs 0% admission, P=.04). Previous Apple iOS product owners were also more likely to use the iPad in key areas. Overall, 84% of residents thought the iPad was a good investment for the residency program, and over half of residents (58%) reported that patients commented on the iPad in a positive way. CONCLUSIONS: While the use of tablets such as the iPad by residents is generally well received, high initial expectations highlight the danger of implementing new technologies. Education on the realistic expectations of iPad benefits may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Interna , Internado y Residencia , Microcomputadores , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
13.
Acad Med ; 98(6S): S39-S45, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36811974

RESUMEN

Adhering to the paradigm of the natural sciences, much of undergraduate medical education (UME) in the United States remains committed to objectivity, compliance, and standardization in its approach to teaching, evaluation, student affairs, and accreditation practices. The authors argue that, while these simple and complicated problem solving (SCPS) approaches may be valid for some highly controlled environments of UME, they lack rigor in complex, real-world environments where optimal care and education is not standardized but is tailored to context and individual needs. This argument is supported by evidence that "systems" approaches, characterized by complex problem solving (CPS, differentiated from complicated problem solving), lead to better outcomes in patient care and student academic performance. Examples of interventions implemented at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine from 2011 to 2021 further illustrate this point. Interventions in student well-being that emphasize personal and professional growth have led to student satisfaction that is 20% higher than the national average on the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ). Career advising interventions that augment the use of adaptive behaviors in place of rules and guidelines have yielded 30% fewer residency applications per student than the national average while simultaneously yielding residency "unmatched" rates that are one-third of the national average. Regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion, an emphasis on civil discourse around real-world problems has been associated with student attitudes toward diversity that are 40% more favorable than the national average on the GQ. In addition, there has been an increase in the number of matriculating students who are underrepresented in medicine to 35% of the incoming class. The article concludes with a review of philosophic barriers to incorporating the CPS paradigm into UME and of notable pedagogic differences between CPS and SCPS approaches.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Medicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudiantes , Solución de Problemas , Curriculum
14.
Acad Med ; 98(4): 458-462, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36377865

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Mental health conditions are common among medical students. While stigma contributes to low rates of help seeking, little programming exists to address stigma. APPROACH: In 2015, the authors developed a mental health initiative (MHI) to combat stigma at the Pritzker School of Medicine featuring 3 elements: (1) Mental Health Panel, an annual first-year event where faculty/peers share mental health stories; (2) Pritzker, I Screwed Up, an annual all-school event where faculty/peers share experiences with failure; and (3) Humans of Pritzker, a social media initiative featuring students' mental health posts. Postevent surveys and the 2021-2022 MHI survey assessed student satisfaction and impact on stigma and help-seeking behaviors. Student Counseling Services utilization rates for medical and nonmedical students were compared for academic years 2014-2015 vs 2018-2019 and 2020-2021 to account for the pandemic's impact on mental health care utilization. OUTCOMES: The MHI survey response rate was 61% (261/430). Respondents were distributed across class-years. Most were female (57%, 150/261). The majority agreed they could speak about mental health without judgment from peers (78%, 203/259) and faculty (57%, 149/260). Most (62%, 161/260) utilized mental health services during medical school. Of these, 41% (66/161) agreed that MHI programming contributed to their decision to seek care. On the 2021-2022 Mental Health Panel and Pritzker, I Screwed Up evaluations, almost all agreed that faculty/peers sharing experiences destigmatized mental illness (99%, 78/79) and making mistakes (96%, 152/159). Student Counseling Services utilization increased from 8% (32/389) for 2014-2015 to 19% (75/394) for 2018-2019 and 33% (136/406) for 2020-2021 for medical students, compared with 19% (2,248/12,138) to 21% (3,024/14,293) and 22% (3,285/15,004) for nonmedical students. NEXT STEPS: Faculty and peers sharing mental health stories may help reduce stigma and increase help seeking in medical students. Future work should explore the longitudinal impact of programming and disseminating similar initiatives at other institutions.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Salud Mental , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Estigma Social , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología
15.
Acad Med ; 96(5): 728-735, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538474

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and scope of wellness programs at U.S. and Canadian medical schools. METHOD: In July 2019, the authors surveyed 159 U.S. and Canadian medical schools regarding the prevalence, structure, and scope of their wellness programs. They inquired about the scope of programming, mental health initiatives, and evaluation strategies. RESULTS: Of the 159 schools, 104 responded (65%). Ninety schools (93%, 90/97) had a formal wellness program, and across 75 schools, the mean full-time equivalent (FTE) support for leadership was 0.77 (standard deviation [SD] 0.76). The wellness budget did not correlate with school type or size (respectively, P = .24 and P = .88). Most schools reported adequate preventative programming (62%, 53/85), reactive programming (86%, 73/85), and cultural programming (52%, 44/85), but most reported too little focus on structural programming (56%, 48/85). The most commonly reported barrier was lack of financial support (52%, 45/86), followed by lack of administrative support (35%, 30/86). Most schools (65%, 55/84) reported in-house mental health professionals with dedicated time to see medical students; across 43 schools, overall mean FTE for mental health professions was 1.62 (SD 1.41) and mean FTE per student enrolled was 0.0024 (SD 0.0019). Most schools (62%, 52/84) evaluated their wellness programs; they used the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (83%, 43/52) and/or annual student surveys (62%, 32/52). The most commonly reported barrier to evaluation was lack of time (54%, 45/84), followed by lack of administrative support (43%, 36/84). CONCLUSIONS: Wellness programs are widely established at U.S. and Canadian medical schools, and most focus on preventative and reactive programming, as opposed to structural programming. Rigorous evaluation of the effectiveness of programs on student well-being is needed to inform resource allocation and program development. Schools should ensure adequate financial and administrative support to promote students' well-being and success.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
16.
Acad Med ; 95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments): S51-S57, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889920

RESUMEN

In 2015, the Pritzker School of Medicine experienced increasing student interest in the changing sociopolitical landscape of the United States and the interaction of these events with student and patient identity. To address this interest, an Identity and Inclusion Steering Committee was formed and formally charged with "providing ongoing direction for programs and/or curricula at Pritzker that support an inclusive learning environment and promote respectful and effective communication with diverse patients and colleagues around issues of identity." The authors describe this committee's structure and steps taken by the committee to create an inclusive community of students at Pritzker characterized by learning through civil discourse. Initiatives were guided by a strategy of continuous quality improvement consisting of regular iterative evaluation, ongoing school-wide engagement, and responsiveness to issues and concerns as they emerged. Data collected over the committee's 4-year existence demonstrate significant improvement in students' sense of inclusion and respect for different perspectives on issues related to identity, such as access to health care, racialized medicine, safe spaces, and nursing labor strikes. The authors discuss several principles that support the development of an inclusive community of students as well as challenges to the implementation of such programming. They conclude that a strategy of continuous quality improvement guided by values of social justice, tolerance, and civil discourse can build community inclusion and enhance medical training for the care of diverse patient populations.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/tendencias , Identificación Social , Inclusión Social , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Educación Médica/métodos , Educación Médica/normas , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Aprendizaje
17.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 35(12): 613-9, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20043501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improving patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians and understand their roles is vital to safe patient care. Picture cards were designed to facilitate physician introductions. The effect of Feedback Care and Evaluation (FACE) cards on patients' ability to correctly identify their inpatient physicians and on patients understanding of physicians roles was assessed. METHODS: In October 2006, team members introduced themselves with FACE cards, which included a photo and an explanation of their roles. During an inpatient interview, research assistants asked patients to name their inpatient physicians and trainees and to rate their understanding of their physicians' roles. RESULTS: Of 2,100 eligible patients, 1,686 (80%) patients participated in the baseline period, and 857 (67%) of the 1,278 patients in the intervention period participated in the evaluation. With the FACE intervention, patients were significantly more likely to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician (attending, resident, or intern; baseline 12.5% versus intervention 21.1%; p < .001). Of the 181 patients who were able to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician in the intervention period, research assistants noted that 59% (107) had FACE cards visible in their rooms. Surprisingly, fewer patients rated their understanding of their physicians' roles as excellent or very good in the intervention period (45.6%) compared with the baseline period (55.3%; p < .001). DISCUSSION: Although FACE cards improved patients ability to identify their inpatient physicians, many patients still could not identify their inpatient doctors. FACE cards may have served as a reminder to physicians to introduce themselves to their patients. The FACE cards also served to highlight patients' misunderstanding of their physicians' roles.


Asunto(s)
Administración Hospitalaria , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos
19.
Arch Intern Med ; 167(16): 1738-44, 2007 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17846392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because of concerns regarding sleep deprivation, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education limits duty hours and endorses education regarding sleep loss for residents. We assessed the effectiveness of a 60- to 90-minute lecture, the Sleep, Alertness, and Fatigue Education in Residency (SAFER) program, on sleep loss and recovery sleep in residents adhering to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty hours. METHODS: From July 1, 2003, through June 24, 2005, interns from the inpatient medicine service at the University of Chicago were asked to wear wristwatch activity monitors. In March 2005, interns received the SAFER program intervention. We used fixed-effects linear regression to estimate within-subject mean sleep per call day (on-call, precall, postcall, and second-day postcall sleep). These estimates were compared with recommended minimum levels of preventive (7 hours of precall) and recovery (16 hours during the 2 days after call) sleep in healthy populations using 2-tailed t tests. These analyses were repeated to test the effect of the SAFER program. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 81 interns (72%) participated for 147 intern-months (63%). Interns on call slept an average of 2.84 hours (95% confidence interval, 2.75-2.93 hours). Interns obtained less than recommended amounts of recovery sleep (14.06 hours [95% confidence interval, 13.84-14.28 hours]; P < .001). Intern preventive sleep was also less than recommended (6.47 hours [95% confidence interval, 6.39-6.56 hours]; P < .001). Interns attempted to compensate for their acute sleep loss; for each hour of on-call sleep loss, they received 18 minutes (95% confidence interval, 7-30 minutes) more recovery sleep (P = .003). The SAFER program had no significant beneficial effect on intern sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Under the current duty-hour regulations of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, residents continue to be sleep deprived. The SAFER program has no impact on resident precall or postcall sleep.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Disomnias/prevención & control , Higiene , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Fatiga Mental/prevención & control , Sueño/fisiología , Disomnias/epidemiología , Disomnias/etiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Incidencia , Fatiga Mental/complicaciones , Fatiga Mental/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
20.
JAMA ; 300(10): 1146-53, 2008 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18780843

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Further restrictions in resident duty hours are being considered, and it is important to understand the association between workload, sleep loss, shift duration, and the educational time of on-call medical interns. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether increased on-call intern workload, as measured by the number of new admissions on-call and the number of previously admitted patients remaining on the service, was associated with reductions in on-call sleep, increased total shift duration, and lower likelihood of participation in educational activities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of medical interns at a single US academic medical center from July 1, 2003, through June 24, 2005. Of the 81 interns, 56 participated (69%), for a total of 165 general medicine inpatient months resulting in 1100 call nights. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On-call sleep duration, estimated by wrist watch actigraphy; total shift duration, measured from paging logs; and participation in educational activities (didactic lectures or bedside teaching), measured by experience sampling method via a personal digital assistant. RESULTS: Mean (SD) sleep duration on-call was 2.8 (1.5) hours and mean (SD) shift duration was 29.9 (1.7) hours. Interns reported spending 11% of their time in educational activities. Early in the academic year (July to October), each new on-call admission was associated with less sleep (-10.5 minutes [95% confidence interval {CI}, -16.8 to -4.2 minutes]; P < .001) and a longer shift duration (13.2 minutes [95% CI, 3.2-23.3 minutes]; P = .01). A higher number of previously admitted patients remaining on the service was associated with a lower odds of participation in educational activities (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.70-0.96]; P = .01]. Call nights during the week and early in the academic year were associated with the most sleep loss and longest shift durations. CONCLUSION: In this study population, increased on-call workload was associated with more sleep loss, longer shift duration, and a lower likelihood of participation in educational activities.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Privación de Sueño , Carga de Trabajo , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Admisión del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Estados Unidos , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA