Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Ther ; 46(8): 612-621, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019698

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Niraparib is a poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Niraparib was originally approved in recurrent OC at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg once daily (QD). This analysis characterized the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of niraparib and evaluated the relationships between exposure, efficacy, and safety to support clinical use of an individualized dosing strategy, in which the starting dose of niraparib was adjusted based on patient characteristics to improve the benefit-risk profile. METHODS: A population PK model was developed by pooling data from four niraparib clinical trials (PN001 [n = 104], QUADRA [n = 455], NOVA [n = 403], and PRIMA [n = 480]) in patients with solid tumors, including OC. Exposure-response analyses were conducted to explore the relationships of niraparib exposure with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events in the PRIMA study. A multivariate logistic regression model was also developed to estimate the probability of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, using data from patients enrolled in PRIMA and NOVA. The impact of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen (200 mg QD in patients with body weight [BW] <77 kg or platelet count [PLT] <150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD in patients with BW ≥77 kg and PLT ≥150,000/µL) on systemic exposure, efficacy, and safety was assessed. FINDINGS: Niraparib disposition was best described by a 3-compartment model with linear elimination. Key covariates included baseline creatinine clearance, BW, albumin, and age, all of which had minor effects on niraparib exposure. Comparable model-predicted exposure up to the time of disease progression/death or censoring in the 300-mg FSD and 200-/300-mg ISD groups was consistent with the lower rate of dose reduction in the ISD groups. No consistent niraparib exposure-response relationship was observed for efficacy in all PRIMA patients (first-line OC), and no statistically significant difference was seen in PFS curves for patients receiving a niraparib dose of 200 mg versus 300 mg. In the multivariate regression model, performed using combined data from PRIMA and NOVA, higher niraparib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state [AUCss]), lower BW, and lower PLT were associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IMPLICATIONS: Population PK and exposure-response analyses support use of an ISD to improve the safety profile of niraparib, including reducing the rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, without compromising efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01847274 (NOVA), NCT00749502 (PN001), NCT02655016 (PRIMA), NCT02354586 (QUADRA), www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.


Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto
2.
Anticancer Res ; 29(1): 139-44, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19331143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of estrogen insensitivity or estrogen resistance in ovarian cancer cells are not known. Studies on regulation of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene have suggested a role for epigenetics in silencing ER expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cells from insensitive ovarian cancer cells, SKOV3 and HEY, were cultured with and without the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AzaC) and the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, trichostatin (TSA). ERbeta promoter methylation was examined using bisulfite sequencing. RNA was collected for oligonucleotide array studies. RESULTS: Cell type-specific ERbeta promoter methylation was found as well as relative hypomethylation of the ERbeta promoter in SKOV3 compared to HEY cells. Preferential demethylation of specific CpGs by different treatments was found. AzaC and TSA resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and alterations in expression of numerous genes. CONCLUSION: The ERbeta promoter is differentially methylated in ovarian cancer cells. Moreover, AzaC and TSA can inhibit ovarian cancer cell growth.


Asunto(s)
Receptor beta de Estrógeno/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Azacitidina/análogos & derivados , Azacitidina/farmacología , Procesos de Crecimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Procesos de Crecimiento Celular/fisiología , Línea Celular Tumoral , ADN (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , ADN (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferasas/metabolismo , Metilación de ADN , Decitabina , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Femenino , Histona Acetiltransferasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Histona Acetiltransferasas/metabolismo , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/farmacología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA