Predictors for temporary stomas non-closure among non-metastatic rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The primary treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer is curative resection. However, sphincter-preserving surgery may lead to complications. This study aims to develop a predictive model for stoma non-closure in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent low anterior resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between January 2005 and December 2017, who underwent low anterior resection, were retrospectively included in the Chang Gung Memorial Foundation Institutional Review Board. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis of potential risk factors linked to stoma non-closure were performed. RESULTS: Out of 956 patients with temporary stomas, 10.3% (n = 103) experienced non-closure primarily due to cancer recurrence and anastomosis-related issues. Through multivariate analysis, several preoperative risk factors significantly associated with stoma non-closure were identified, including advanced age, anastomotic leakage, positive nodal status, high preoperative CEA levels, lower rectal cancer presence, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. A risk assessment model achieved an AUC of 0.724, with a cutoff of 2.5, 84.5% sensitivity, and 51.4% specificity. Importantly, the non-closure rate could rise to 16.6% when more than two risk factors were present, starkly contrasting the 3.7% non-closure rate observed in cases with a risk score of 2 or below (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prognostic risk factors associated with the non-closure of a temporary stoma include advanced age, symptomatic anastomotic leakage, nodal status, high CEA levels, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Hence, it is crucial for surgeons to evaluate these factors and provide patients with a comprehensive prognosis before undergoing surgical intervention.

The prognostic and predictive significance of perineural invasion in stage I to III colon cancer: a propensity score matching-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) presents with varying prognoses, and identifying factors for predicting metastasis and outcomes is crucial. Perineural invasion (PNI) is a debated prognostic factor for CRC, particularly in stage I-III patients, but its role in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive colon cancer remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a single-center study using data from the Colorectal Section Tumor Registry Database at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. This prospective study involved 3,327 CRC patients, 1,536 of whom were eligible after application of the exclusion criteria, to investigate the prognostic value of PNI in stage I-III patients and its predictive value for node-positive/negative cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias, and follow-up was performed with standardized procedures. RESULTS: PNI-positive (PNI+) tumors were associated with higher preoperative CEA levels and more frequent adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM, PNI + tumors were associated with marginally significantly lower 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and significantly lower overall survival (OS) rates in stages III CRC. However, no significant differences were observed in stages I and II. Subgroup analysis showed that among PNI + tumors, only poorly differentiated tumors had higher odds of recurrence. PNI did not predict outcomes in node-negative colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefited PNI + patients with node-positive but not those with node-negative disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that PNI is an independent poor prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer but does not predict outcomes in node-negative disease. Given the potential adverse effects of adjuvant chemotherapy, our findings discourage its use in node-negative colon cancer when PNI is present.

Using oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study from Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Early-stage colorectal cancer had excellent outcomes after curative resection, typically. However, a perplexing survival paradox between stage II and stage III was noted. This paradox could be influenced by the administration of routine postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and the presence of high-risk factors in stage II CRC. The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of high-risk factors on patients with stage II CRC and assess the efficacy of oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRC patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using propensity score matching at a single medical institution. A total of 1544 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between January 2004 and January 2009 were included. The intervention used was tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 261 patients were included in three groups: no-treatment, half-year treatment, and one-year treatment. The clinical characteristics of each group tended to be more consistent. The Cox proportional hazard models showed that tegafur/uracil treatment or not was a significant independent factor for oncological outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed significantly better disease-free survival and overall survival. Further investigation revealed that tegafur/uracil duration was an independent factor for oncological outcome. While the survival curve did not reach statistical significance, the one-year UFT treatment group demonstrated the best treatment trend. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin is a feasible adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with stage II colorectal cancer after curative surgical treatment. Prolonged tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin treatment for 12 months showed a trend towards better outcomes in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Effect of short-course radiotherapy followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy on organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the effectiveness, safety, and mid-term oncological outcomes of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 64 patients with LARC who underwent SCRT and tegafox (tegafur-uracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin) or mFOLFOX-6 (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) consolidation chemotherapy before surgery between January 2015 and December 2020. Tumor response, patient compliance, toxicity, surgical outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with a mean age of 58.67 years (44 males) were included; 48 (75%) had tumors within 5 cm of the anal verge. Additionally, 93.8% of the patients underwent at least 2 months of chemotherapy, and three required dose reduction. Grade III toxicity occurred in 2 patients, and 10 had a clinical complete response and opted for non-operative management. One patient experienced tumor progression and underwent further treatment without surgery. Among the 53 patients who underwent surgery, 51 (96.2%) had sphincter preservation, 3 had Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, and no mortality occurred. The complete response rate for the entire cohort was 23.4%. Moreover, 47 patients (74.6%) had a neoadjuvant rectal score of < 16 after treatment. After a median follow-up time of 32.01 months, 6 (9.3%) had local recurrence, and 17 (26.6%) had distant metastasis. The 3-year OS, DFS and stoma-free rates were 89.5%, 65.5%, and 78.1% respectively. CONCLUSION: SCRT followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy is safe and effective for tumor downstaging in LARC, further improving the sphincter preservation rate.

Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.

BACKGROUND: Although a temporary stoma can mitigate the severity of anastomotic leakage, some rectal cancer patients retain a permanent stoma after sphincter-preserving surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to identify independent preoperative risk factors for permanent stoma and establish a prediction model for mid-and low-rectal cancer patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery and temporary stoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2000 and 2015. The risk factors for permanent stomas were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1020 rectal cancer patients with temporary stoma were included. The overall rate of permanent stoma was 17.5% (n = 179). Cancer progression and anastomotic complications are major causes of permanent stomas. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative risk factors such as advanced age, male sex, preoperative CEA ≥ 10 ng/ml, T4 stage, N stage, low rectal tumor, and ASA ≥ III were independent preoperative risk factors after adjustment. The ROC curve of the risk factors and permanent stoma showed an AUC of 0.689, a cut-off value of 2.5, a sensitivity of 0.689, and a specificity of 0.622. The permanent stoma rates were significantly higher between risk scores ≤ 2 and > 2 (29.9% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CEA ≥ 10 ng/ml, T4 stage, N stage, low rectal tumor, advanced age, ASA ≥ III, and male sex were independent preoperative prognostic factors for a permanent stoma. The risk was higher with a score greater than two. Therefore, the risk of subsequent permanent stoma should be evaluated and informed to the patient prior to the primary surgery.

Smoking cessation for less than 10 years remains a risk factor of anastomotic leakage in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Although cigarette smoking is a well-known risk factor for anastomotic leakage during rectal surgery, the proper duration of smoking cessation that can decrease anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the optimal duration of smoking cessation that can reduce this complication. METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, we enrolled 1246 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent sphincter-preserving surgery without preventive stoma at the Division of Colorectal Surgery of a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. Questionnaires were used to record their pre-surgical smoking status. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off duration of smoking cessation. Multivariate analysis was used to verify the effect of cigarette cessation on anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The ROC curve showed a cut-off value of 10.5 years of cessation duration. Therefore, the former-smoker group was further divided using a cessation duration of 10 years. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.29%. However, the anastomotic leakage rate in current smokers (9.3%) and in those who quit for < 10 years (12.9%) was significantly higher than that in non-smokers (3.3%) and those who quit for ≥ 10 years (4.5%). On multivariate analysis, current smokers (p = 0.022), former smokers with < 10 years of smoking cessation (OR 2.725; p = 0.029), male sex (p = 0.015), and low rectal cancer (p < 0.001) were all independently related to the development of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation for < 10 years remains a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery.

Short- and medium-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUNDS: Though better short-term outcomes were frequently reported, differences in specimen parameters and the rate of subsequent peritoneal recurrence between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomoses (EA) for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy have not been analyzed. We aimed to compare the pathologic differences and oncological outcomes between these two approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 217 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies from September 2016 to April 2018 and classified them into IA and EA groups, based on the approach used. Propensity score matching analysis was performed, after which 101 patients were included in each group with the patients matched for demographics, tumor stage, and localization. RESULTS: The IA group had a longer operative time, shorter length of stay, shorter time to first flatus and tolerating a soft diet, and better pain scale scores at postoperative day 3. No inter-group differences in conversion, postoperative complication, mortality, or readmission rates were found. The IA group had a longer resected colon length (23.67 vs. 19.75 cm, p = 0.010) and nearest resected margin (7.51 vs. 5.40 cm, p = 0.010) for cancer near the hepatic flexure. There are comparable 3-year overall survival (87.7% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.604) and disease-free survival (75.0% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.842) between the IA and EA groups. The rate of peritoneal recurrence was similar between the two groups (5.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.580). CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival, disease-free survival, and the rate of peritoneal recurrence were comparable between the IA and EA procedures. IA ensures better recovery and comparable complications to EA and achieved a more precise tumor excision; thus, IA can be considered a safe procedure for patients with right-sided colon lesions.

Association of a Preoperative Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity might be directly or indirectly linked to the risk of colorectal cancer and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate whether preoperative physical activity plays a role in reducing short-term postoperative complications and improving long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a department of colorectal surgery in a tertiary teaching hospital between January 1995 and December 2016. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent curative resection for stage I to III primary colorectal cancer were enrolled. According to the preoperative leisure-time weekly metabolic equivalent of task values, patients were divided into 2 groups: the metabolic equivalent of task <12 group and the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to reduce imbalance and selection biases based on 6 covariates, namely, age, sex, BMI, tumor location, tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: χ tests were used to analyze short-term postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In the matched cohort patients, significant differences in overall postoperative complications and mortality were observed in favor of the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group, although there was no difference in any single item of postoperative morbidity. The results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated a significant survival benefit in the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group compared with the metabolic equivalent of task <12 group both for disease-free and overall survival. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: This single-institute study provides evidence of the association of preoperative leisure-time physical activity with short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B189. ASOCIACIÓN DE ACTIVIDAD FÍSICA DE TIEMPO LIBRE PREOPERATORIA CON RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DE PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A RESECCIÓN CURATIVA POR CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO I-III: UN ANÁLISIS DE COINCIDENCIA DE PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIÓN ANTECEDENTES: LA ACTIVIDAD FíSICA PUEDE ESTAR DIRECTA O INDIRECTAMENTE RELACIONADA CON EL RIESGO DE CÁNCER COLORRECTAL Y EL PRONÓSTICO DE LOS PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL.: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo dilucidar si la actividad física preoperatoria desempeña un papel en la reducción de las complicaciones postoperatorias a corto plazo y en mejorar la supervivencia a largo plazo de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal.Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente.Este estudio se realizó en un departamento de cirugía colorrectal en un hospital universitario terciario entre Enero de 1995 y Diciembre de 2016.Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a resección curativa por cáncer colorrectal primario en estadio I-III. De acuerdo con el equivalente metabólico semanal en el tiempo libre de los valores de la tarea preoperatorio, los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos: el equivalente metabólico del grupo de tarea <12 y el equivalente metabólico del grupo de tarea ≥ 12. Se utilizó una coincidencia de puntaje de propensión 1: 1 para reducir los desequilibrios y los sesgos de selección basados en seis covariables, principalmente, edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, ubicación del tumor, estadio del tumor y administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.Las pruebas de Chi-cuadrado se utilizaron para analizar las complicaciones postoperatorias a corto plazo. Los análisis de Kaplan-Meier se utilizaron para evaluar la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia general.en los pacientes de la cohorte emparejada, se observaron diferencias significativas en las complicaciones postoperatorias generales y la mortalidad a favor del equivalente metabólico del grupo de tareas ≥ 12, aunque no hubo diferencias en ningún elemento único de morbilidad postoperatoria. Los resultados del análisis de Kaplan-Meier y la prueba de log-rank demostraron un beneficio de supervivencia significativo en el equivalente metabólico del grupo tarea ≥ 12 en comparación con el equivalente metabólico del grupo tarea <12 tanto para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad como para la supervivencia general.Este estudio está limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva.Este estudio de instituto único proporciona evidencia de la asociación de la actividad física preoperatoria en el tiempo libre con la morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias a corto plazo, así como la supervivencia a largo plazo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B189. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Kahlil).

Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer After Curative-Intent Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has yet to be used as a prognostic or adjuvant chemotherapy factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all stage I-III CRC patients with different preoperative serum CEA levels (≤ 5, 5-10, and > 10 ng/ml) at a single center between 1995 and 2010. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio between the two elevated CEA groups (5-10 ng/ml and > 10 ng/ml) and in a 1:2 ratio between the elevated and non-elevated groups (≤ 5 ng/ml), with a caliper of 0.05. RESULTS: After exclusion and matching, 3857 patients had preoperative CEA levels ≤ 5 ng/ml, 1121 patients had CEA levels between 5 and 10 ng/ml, and 1121 patients had CEA levels > 10 ng/ml. Elevated preoperative CEA showed an increased risk of overall survival (5-10 ng/ml: hazard ratio [HR] 1.376; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.523; both p < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (5-10 ng/ml: HR 1.404; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.712; both p < 0.001), and recurrence free interval (5-10 ng/ml: HR 1.190; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.468; both p < 0.05). Patients with negative lymph node staging (LNs) and CEA > 10 ng/ml, as well as those with positive LNs and CEA ≤ 5 ng/ml, showed similar overall survival (5-year survival: 72% vs. 69%; p = 0.542) and recurrence free intervals (19.9 vs. 21.72 months; p = 0.662). CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative CEA level can be an independent prognostic factor for stage I-III CRC after curative resection. Patients with negative LNs and preoperative CEA level > 10 ng/ml should be considered for intensive follow-up or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk.

BACKGROUND: Local excision (LE) is a feasible treatment approach for rectal cancers in stage pT1 and presents low pathological risk, whereas total mesorectal excision (TME) is a reasonable treatment for more advanced cancers. On the basis of the pathology findings, surgeons may suggest TME for patients receiving LE. This study compared the survival outcomes between LE with/without chemoradiation and TME in mid and low rectal cancer patients in stage pT1/pT2, with highly selective intermediate pathological risk. METHODS: This retrospective study included 134 patients who received TME and 39 patients who underwent LE for the treatment of intermediate risk (pT1 with poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, relatively large tumor, or small-sized pT2 tumor) rectal cancer between 1998 and 2016. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) were similar between the LE (3-year DFS 92%) and TME (3-year DFS 91%) groups. Following subgrouping into an LE with adjuvant therapy group and a TME without adjuvant therapy group, the compared survival outcomes (OS, DFS, and CRR) were found not to be statistically different. The temporary and permanent ostomy rates were higher in the TME group than in the LE group (p < 0.001). Rates of early and late morbidity following surgery were higher in the TME group (p = 0.005), and LE had similar survival compared with TME. CONCLUSION: For patients who had mid and low rectal cancer in stage pT1/pT2 and intermediate pathological risk, LE with chemoradiation presents an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

Primary tumor location in stage III colon cancer has prognostic impact on subsequent liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aim to investigate whether a difference exists between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer at the same disease stage and subsequent liver metastasis and identify whether tumor location can independently influence survival. METHODS: Right-sided colon cancer was defined as malignancy arising from the cecum to the transverse colon; left-sided colon cancer was defined as malignancy arising from the splenic flexure to the sigmoid colon. Clinicopathological features and survival data were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 1442 patients were included for analysis. The median follow-up time was 58.2 months. Patients with left-sided colon cancer had better 5-year overall survival (75.2% vs 61.7%, P = 0.005), 5-year cancer-specific survival (81.6% vs 73.4%, P = 0.001), and 5-year recurrence-free survival (70.9% vs 66.5%, P = 0.033) compared with patients having right-sided colon cancer. After the presentation of subsequent liver metastasis, patients with primary left-sided colon cancer had better 3-year cancer-specific survival ( P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, cancer location was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (right vs left, HR: 1.276, 95% CI: 1.002-1.625). CONCLUSIONS: The primary tumor location can serve as a prognostic factor for treatment outcomes either in primary stage III colon cancer or subsequent liver metastasis.

Various clinicopathological features of patients with metachronous colorectal cancer in relation to different diagnostic intervals.

BACKGROUNDS: Clinicopathologic factors relating to developing metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) have been reported. However, the effects of different diagnostic intervals on these risk factors required further analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 14,481 patients diagnosed from January 1995 to December 2012. Metachronous CRC was defined as the occurrence of a second colorectal cancer at least 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 153 (1.06%) patients developed metachronous CRCs during the follow-up. Significantly higher rates of developing metachronous cancer occurred in male patients (1.2 vs 0.9%), patients with synchronous CRC (2.0 vs 1.0%), and patients with a positive family history of CRC (1.4 vs 0.9%). Pertaining to diagnostic intervals related to clinicopathological features, more severe staging was significant in the diagnostic interval between 2 and 3 years (35 vs 7.7%, 20.6%, 17.5%, P = .01) compared with other intervals. Male patients were more frequently detected to have CRC within 3 years compared with females (53.1 vs 29.1%, P = .005). For a diagnostic interval ≧ 5 years, a significantly higher rate of metachronous CRC located at the right colon was observed than that located at the left colon (36.6 vs 19.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We evinced that a diagnostic interval between 2 and 3 years was a key time for metachronous CRC diagnosis with worse staging distribution. Based on current findings, we recommend the stratification of metachronous CRCs into diagnostic intervals of 1-2, 2-3, and ≧ 3 years, as they exhibit significantly different characteristics.

The dark side of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients aged 75 years or older.

PURPOSE: The rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality is reportedly high in patients aged ≥ 75 years with colorectal cancer (CRC). In such patients, a comparison of the short-term outcome between open method and laparoscopy has not been clearly defined in Taiwan. We aimed to compare postoperative morbidity and mortality parameters after open method and laparoscopy in CRC patients aged ≥ 75 years. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent surgery for CRC from February 2009 to September 2015 at the Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan and analyzed their clinicopathological factors. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed for evaluating if laparoscopic surgery offers more favorable outcomes than open surgery in the elderly. RESULTS: A total of 1133 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this study; they were divided into two groups (open method vs. laparoscopy = 797 vs. 336). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopy group than in the open method group (3.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.003). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates showed no significant difference between these two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the open method group (10.4 ± 8.7 vs. 13.8 ± 13.5 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that laparoscopy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with CRC had higher anastomosis leakage rate compared with open surgery but is acceptable and offers the benefit of a shorter hospital stay over open surgery.

The survival impact of delayed surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on stage II/III rectal cancer with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is standard treatment for clinical stage II/III rectal cancers. However, whether patients with pathological complete response (pT0N0, pCR) should receive adjuvant chemotherapy and whether delayed surgery will influence the pCR rate remains controversial. A nationwide population study was conducted using the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from January 2007 to December 2013. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Of the 1,914 patients who received neoadjuvant CCRT, 259 (13.6%) achieved pCR and had better survival (adjusted HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.58; p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of pCR rose up to 83.4% in the 9th week and slowly reached a plateau after the 11th week. Among the patients with pCR, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had no survival benefits compared to those without adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted HR: 0.72, 95 CI: 0.27-1.93; p = 0.52). By subgroup analysis, those younger than 70-year old and received adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival benefit than those without adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.97; p = 0.046). Delayed surgery by 9-12 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant CCRT can maximize the pCR rate, which is correlated with better survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in patients with pCR and aged <70-year old, but further prospectively randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Clinical features and prognosis in hepatectomy for colorectal cancer with centrally located liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic metastasectomy for patients with primary colorectal cancer offers better long-term outcome, and chemotherapy can increase the rate of hepatic resectability for patients with initially inoperable disease. The pattern of liver metastasis and status of the primary tumor are rarely discussed in the analysis of long-term outcome. In this report, we evaluate the influence of the pattern of metastasis on clinical features and prognosis. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine patients who underwent hepatic metastasectomy with curative intent for liver metastasis of colorectal cancer between October 1991 and December 2006 were enrolled. Patients were grouped according to whether liver metastasis was centrally or peripherally located, based on imaging and operative findings. Patient demographics, characteristics of the primary and metastatic tumors, and surgical outcomes were analyzed for long-term survival. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients with centrally located metastases were male, as compared with those with peripherally located metastases. Compared with patients with peripherally located metastases, patients with centrally located metastases were more likely to have multiple lesions (P = 0.016), involvement of multiple segments (P = 0.006), large metastases (P < 0.001), and bilobar distribution of metastases (P < 0.001). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 22.4% and 34.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that centrally located metastasis, primary tumor in the transverse colon, metastasis in regional lymph nodes, initial extrahepatic metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, multiple lesions, poorly differentiated tumor, and resection margin <10 mm were significant poor prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Cox regression analysis showed that inadequate resection margin and centrally located liver metastasis were significant predictors of shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal cancer, centrally located liver metastasis represents a poor prognostic factor after hepatectomy, and is associated with early recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be used to downstage centrally located liver metastases to improve outcome.

Rectal cancer level significantly affects rates and patterns of distant metastases among rectal cancer patients post curative-intent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients have a higher incidence of pulmonary metastases than those with colon cancer. This study aimed to examine the effects of rectal cancer level on recurrence patterns in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with T3/T4 rectal cancers who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2006 were recruited in this study. All the patients were followed up on until death. Recurrence patterns and survival rates were calculated in relation to clinical variables. RESULTS: There were 884 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with low-rectal cancer had significantly worse five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (47.25% and 44.07%, respectively) than patients with mid-rectal (63.46% and 60.22%, respectively) and upper-rectal cancers (73.91% and 71.87%, respectively). The level of the tumor (P <0.001), nodal status (P <0.001), tumor invasion depth (P <0.001), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.047, P = 0.015) significantly affected the surgical outcomes related to OS and DFS in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, the level of the rectal cancer was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 1.114; 95% CI, 1.074 to 1.161; P <0.001) for local recurrence, lung metastases, bone metastases, and systemic lymph node metastases. Significantly higher incidence rates of bone (53.8%) and brain metastases (22.6%) after initial lung metastases rather than initial liver metastases (14.8% and 2.9%, respectively) were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: For rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection, the rectal cancer level significantly affected surgical outcomes including rates and patterns of distant metastases.

Impact of chemotherapy-related prognostic factors on long-term survival in patients with stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic factors of chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection. METHODS: From 1996 to 2001, 1,054 patients with primary single colorectal cancer underwent curative resection. Seven hundred sixteen patients received various 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, including oral and intravenous treatments. The chemotherapy-related parameters examined included therapeutic duration, frequency, route of administration, composition of combination therapies, and postoperative time interval from the operation to the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The therapeutic duration and postoperative time interval of starting therapy were independent prognostic factors, in addition to clinicopathological factors. The 8-year cancer-specific/overall survival rates in patients who received chemotherapy for >4 months (63.0/58.6%) were significantly higher than the rates in patients who received no chemotherapy (56.7/37.7%, P < 0.01) and those who remained on chemotherapy for 1-4 months (49.4/41.9%, P < 0.05). The 8-year cancer-specific/overall survival rates in patients who waited 1-5 weeks after surgery to receive chemotherapy (62.9/58.5%) were significantly higher versus rates in those who did not receive chemotherapy (56.7/37.7%) and those who did not receive chemotherapy until >5 weeks after surgery (52.3/45.9%) (both P < 0.05). Survival rates did not differ between patients who did not undergo chemotherapy, those for whom chemotherapy lasted 1-4 months, and patients who did not receive chemotherapy until >5 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate duration of therapy and early chemotherapy after surgery were 2 of the most important factors in eradicating occult cancer and effecting long-term survival benefits in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Anorectal melanoma: review of 22 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate outcome and prognostic factors of patients with anorectal melanoma. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-two consecutive patients with anorectal melanoma received operation from 1993 through 2011 were reviewed. The definitions of stage I, II and III are local disease, locoregional lymphadenopathy and metastatic disease, respectively. RESULTS: The patients included 8 men and 14 women, aged from 36 to 83 years (mean, 58.4 years). At the end of the follow-up period, 19 patients died of disease and only 3 patients were alive with disease. Only two patients were alive longer than 5 years after operation. For stage I and II tumors that underwent clinical curative resection (n=17), stage II (p=0.04), tumor size >3 cm (p=0.008) and invasion depth to muscle (p=0.021) all showed poorer prognosis in overall survival. Though wide local excision (WLE) were performed in the patients with earlier tumors, there was no statistical difference in overall (p=0.063) and disease-free survival (p=0.333) between WLE and radical surgery. Furthermore, patients with WLE had more chance of local recurrence than radical surgery (6/7 vs. 3/10, p=0.050). Four salvage radical operations could be performed after local recurrence in WLE group. CONCLUSIONS: WLE increases the chance of local recurrence more than radical surgery. Care should be taken to avoid microseeding during performed WLE.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long course concurrent chemoradiotherapy provides potential tumor downstaging. When local recurrent rectal cancer without distant metastases is diagnosed, a potentially curative resection can be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treating isolated local recurrent rectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: Patients (n=102) with isolated local recurrent rectal cancer within the pelvis were scheduled for concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consisting of pelvic irradiation with a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered concurrently and included 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin by venous infusion over 2 h on day 1, followed by 1,200 mg*m-2*day-1 of continuous venous infusion for 2 days. This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks for 6 cycles. The overall survival rate, responses, disease-free interval and toxicities were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients completed planned concurrent chemoradiation. Complete clinical responses were found in 13 of the 96 patients (14%), partial responses in 59 (61%), stable disease in 21 (22%) and disease progression in 3 (3%). The overall survival and disease-free survival rates in all the 96 patients were 45% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer is complicated. Concurrent chemoradiation can increase disease-free survival and overall survival by increasing complete resection rate of locally recurrent tumors and even complete response of the tumors. Ongoing treatment strategies aim to enhance response rates and to accurately assess the extent of local recurrent tumor response to concurrent chemoradiation.

Perianal Basal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.

(1) Background: BCC is a sporadic disease that develops in areas of the skin not exposed to the sun. Perianal BCC, which occurs in the anorectal region, accounts for less than 0.2% of all BCC cases. There have been only a few reported cases of the disease, with fewer than 200 cases reported in total. Given the diagnostic challenges and potential for misdiagnosis, we conducted a systematic review of perianal basal cell carcinoma using real-world data to provide comprehensive and detailed information on the disease. (2) Methods: The study was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 2020. Patients' clinical pathologic features, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were presented. (3) Results: The results of 41 studies involving 140 patients were analyzed. The most common symptoms reported by patients at presentation were anorectal bleeding, pain, and pruritus. Ulceration was the most frequently observed tumor characteristic. The majority of patients underwent local excision as their primary treatment, with only eight patients experiencing a recurrence. Our analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the outcomes of different treatment modalities. (4) Conclusions: Identifying perianal BCC poses a significant challenge as it closely resembles other anal diseases, thereby making it difficult to differentiate between the different conditions. However, a wide local excision with clear margins is considered an effective treatment option for most patients. Alternative treatments, such as radiotherapy, may be recommended for patients who are unable to undergo surgery.