Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 191(11): 656, 2019 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630270

RESUMEN

The negative consequences of urbanisation have been recently recognised despite the social and economic benefits it provides to the community. Effects of urbanisation include increases in surface runoff, frequency and magnitude of floods and urban water harvesting capacity. Accordingly, this study utilised multi-spectral and multi-resolution satellite images combined with field data to conduct a quantitative assessment of the impact of urbanisation on urban flooding for the period of 1975-2015 in Ajman City, United Arab Emirates (UAE). Results showed that urban areas in the city have increased by approximately 12-fold over the period 1975-2015, whilst the population increased by approximately 16-fold. Owing to a substantial increase in urbanisation (as impervious areas expanded), minimum precipitation to generate runoff in built areas dropped from approximately 16.37 mm in 1975 to approximately 13.3 mm in 2015, which caused a substantial increase in the surface runoff. To visualise the flooding potential, urban flooding maps were generated using a well-established decision analysis technique called Analytical Hierarchy Process. The latter adopted three thematic factors, namely excess rain, elevation and slope. Flooding potential was then found to have increased substantially, specifically in the downtown area. Finally, this study is expected to contribute highly to flood protection and sustainable urban storm water management in Ajman City.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Inundaciones , Lluvia , Urbanización , Movimientos del Agua , Ciudades , Modelos Teóricos , Imágenes Satelitales , Análisis Espacio-Temporal , Emiratos Árabes Unidos
2.
Environ Monit Assess ; 188(1): 58, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26707404

RESUMEN

The use of water quality indices (WQIs) as a tool to evaluate the status of water quality in rivers has been introduced since the 1960s. The WQI transforms selected water quality parameters into a dimensionless number so that changes in river water quality at any particular location and time could be presented in a simple and easily understandable manner. Although many WQIs have been developed, there is no worldwide accepted method for implementing the steps used for developing a WQI. Thus, there is a continuing interest to develop accurate WQIs that suit a local or regional area. This paper aimed to provide significant contribution to the development of future river WQIs through a review of 30 existing WQIs based on the four steps needed to develop a WQI. These steps are the selection of parameters, the generation of sub-indices, the generation of parameter weights and the aggregation process to compute the final index value. From the 30 reviewed WQIs, 7 were identified as most important based on their wider use and they were discussed in detail. It was observed that a major factor that influences wider use of a WQI is the support provided by the government and authorities to implement a WQI as the main tool to evaluate the status of rivers. Since there is a lot of subjectivity and uncertainty involved in the steps for developing and applying a WQI, it is recommended that the opinion of local water quality experts is taken, especially in the first three steps (through techniques like Delphi method). It was also observed that uncertainty and sensitivity analysis was rarely undertaken to reduce uncertainty, and hence such an analysis is recommended for future studies.


Asunto(s)
Ríos/química , Contaminantes del Agua/normas , Contaminación del Agua/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad del Agua/normas , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Agua Dulce
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 945: 174015, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901586

RESUMEN

Accurate estimation of climate change impacts on catchment hydrology is essential for effective future water management. The efficacy of such estimations is dependent on proper climate model selection. In this study, an attempt was made to formulate a methodology for climate model selection, evaluating eight climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The models were assessed for their ability to simulate variables used in hydrological studies and large-scale atmospheric circulation influencing rainfall in Australia. Five statistical indicators Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Spatial Correlation (SC), Percentage Bias (Pbias), Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) were used to evaluate the performance, and the models were ranked through Compromise Programming (CP), a multiple criteria decision making technique. Results show that HadGEM3-GC31-LL performed well in most of the categories considered and was top top-ranked model overall followed by GFDL-ESM4, CESM2-CAM6-RT, and CanESM5 for Australia. Conversely, MIROC6 consistently ranked lower in most of the categories. In the context of simulating hydrological variables, CESM2-CAM6-RT, HadGEM3-GC31-LL, and GFDL-ESM4 emerged as the top three models. The robustness of the proposed methodology suggests its applicability for model selection, making it a replicable approach for climate change impact assessment studies in diverse regions.

4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 19700, 2024 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39181958

RESUMEN

Drought is deemed a major natural disaster that can lead to severe economic and social implications. Drought indices are utilized worldwide for drought management and monitoring. However, as a result of the inherent complexity of drought phenomena and hydroclimatic condition differences, no universal drought index is available for effectively monitoring drought across the world. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a new meteorological drought index to describe and forecast drought based on various artificial intelligence (AI) models: decision tree (DT), generalized linear model (GLM), support vector machine, artificial neural network, deep learning, and random forest. A comparative assessment was conducted between the developed AI-based indices and nine conventional drought indices based on their correlations with multiple drought indicators. Historical records of five drought indicators, namely runoff, along with deep, lower, root, and upper soil moisture, were utilized to evaluate the models' performance. Different combinations of climatic datasets from Alice Springs, Australia, were utilized to develop and train the AI models. The results demonstrated that the rainfall anomaly drought index was the best conventional drought index, scoring the highest correlation (0.718) with the upper soil moisture. The highest correlation between the new and conventional indices was found between the DT-based index and the rainfall anomaly index at a value of 0.97, whereas the lowest correlation was 0.57 between the GLM and the Palmer drought severity index. The GLM-based index achieved the best performance according to its high correlations with conventional drought indicators, e.g., a correlation coefficient of 0.78 with the upper soil moisture. Overall, the developed AI-based drought indices outperformed the conventional indices, hence contributing effectively to more accurate drought forecasting and monitoring. The findings emphasized that AI can be a promising and reliable prediction approach for achieving better drought assessment and mitigation.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA