Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Ann Oncol ; 2024 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) has been associated with longer overall survival (OS) in patients with synchronous unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in retrospective analyses. The aim of the CAIRO4 study was to investigate whether the addition of upfront PTR to systemic therapy resulted in a survival benefit in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of their primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized phase 3 trial was conducted in 45 hospitals in The Netherlands and Denmark. Eligibility criteria included previously untreated mCRC, unresectable metastases, and no severe symptoms of the primary tumor. Patients were randomized (1:1) to upfront PTR followed by systemic therapy or systemic therapy without upfront PTR. Systemic therapy consisted of first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in both arms. Primary endpoint was OS in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01606098. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and February 2021, 206 patients were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 204 patients were included (n= 103 without upfront PTR, n=101 with upfront PTR) of whom 116 were men (57%) with median age of 65 years (IQR 59-71). Median follow-up was 69.4 months. Median OS in the arm without upfront PTR was 18.3 months (95% CI 16.0-22.2) compared to 20.1 months (95% CI 17.0-25.1) in the upfront PTR arm (p = 0.32). The number of grade 3-4 events was 71 (72%) in the arm without upfront PTR and 61 (65%) in the upfront PTR arm (p=0.33). Three deaths (3%) possibly related to treatment were reported in the arm without upfront PTR and four (4%) in the upfront PTR arm. CONCLUSION: of upfront PTR to palliative systemic therapy in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of the primary tumor does not result in a survival benefit. This practice should no longer be considered standard of care.

2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(4): 674-684, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: More insight into the incidence of and factors associated with progression following a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) would offer opportunities for improvements in disease management and patient counseling. METHODS: A long-term post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with AP (2008-2015) was performed. Primary endpoints were recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer. Cumulative incidence calculations and risk analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 1184 patients with a median follow-up of 9 years (IQR: 7-11) were included. RAP and CP occurred in 301 patients (25%) and 72 patients (6%), with the highest incidences observed for alcoholic pancreatitis (40% and 22%). Pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 14 patients (1%). Predictive factors for RAP were alcoholic and idiopathic pancreatitis (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.51-4.82 and OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.40-3.02), and no pancreatic interventions (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Non-biliary etiology (alcohol: OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.94-14.16, idiopathic: OR 4.57, 95% CI 2.05-10.16, and other: OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.11-7.94), RAP (OR 4.93, 95% CI 2.84-8.58), prior pancreatic interventions (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.20-8.02), smoking (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.14-4.78), and male sex (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.05) were independently associated with CP. CONCLUSION: Disease progression was observed in a quarter of pancreatitis patients. We identified several risk factors that may be helpful to devise personalized strategies with the intention to reduce the impact of disease progression in patients with AP.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis Crónica , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Aguda , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Crónica/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 527, 2022 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35449018

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among esophagogastric cancer patients, the probability of having undergone treatment with curative intent has been shown to vary, depending on the hospital of diagnosis. However, little is known about the factors that contribute to this variation. In this study, we sought to understand the organization of clinical pathways and their association with variation in practice. METHODS: A mixed-method study using quantitative and qualitative data was conducted. Quantitative data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (e.g., outpatient clinic consultations and diagnostic procedures). For qualitative data, thematic content analysis was performed using semi-structured interviews (n = 30), observations of outpatient clinic consultations (n = 26), and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM, n = 16) in eight hospitals, to assess clinicians' perspectives regarding the clinical pathways. RESULTS: Quantitative analyses showed that patients more often underwent surgical consultation prior to the MDTM in hospitals associated with a high probability of receiving treatment with curative intent, but more often consulted with a geriatrician in hospitals associated with a low probability of such treatment. The organization of clinical pathways was analyzed quantitatively at three levels: regional, local, and patient levels. At a regional level, hospitals differed in terms of the number of patients discussed during the MDTM. At the local level, the revision of radiological images and restaging after neoadjuvant treatment varied. At the patient level, some hospitals routinely conduct fitness tests, whereas others estimated the patient's physical fitness during an outpatient clinic consultation. Few clinicians performed a standard geriatric consultation in older patients to assess their mental fitness and frailty. CONCLUSION: Surgical consultation prior to MDTM was more often conducted in hospitals associated with a high probability of receiving treatment with curative intent, whereas a geriatrician was consulted more often in hospitals associated with a low probability of receiving such treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano , Vías Clínicas , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Probabilidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia
4.
J Occup Rehabil ; 31(2): 323-338, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880094

RESUMEN

Purpose The aim of this research was to study the effectiveness on return to work (RTW) of an early tailored work-related support intervention in patients diagnosed with curative gastrointestinal cancer. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled trial was undertaken, in which patients were assigned randomly to the intervention or the control group (usual care). The intervention encompassed three psychosocial work-related support meetings, starting before treatment. Five self-reported questionnaires were sent over twelve months of follow-up. Primary outcome was days until RTW (fulltime or partial) and secondary outcomes included work status, quality of life, work ability, and work limitations. Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, relative risk ratio and linear mixed models were applied. Results Participants (N = 88) had a mean age of 55 years; 67% were male and the most common cancer type was colon cancer (66%). Of the participants, 42 were randomized to the intervention group. The median time from sick leave until RTW was 233 days (range 187-279 days) for the control group, versus 190 days (range 139-240 days) for the intervention group (log-rank p = 0.37). The RTW rate at twelve months after baseline was 83.3% for the intervention group and 73.5% for the control group. Work limitations did statistically differ between the groups over time (p = 0.01), but quality of life and work ability did not. Conclusion Patients in the intervention group seem to take fewer days to RTW, albeit not to a statistically significant extent.Trial registration Trial NL4920 (NTR5022) (Dutch Trial Register https://www.trialregister.nl ).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Calidad de Vida , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reinserción al Trabajo , Ausencia por Enfermedad
5.
Br J Surg ; 107(7): 917-926, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence for an association between hospital volume and outcomes for liver surgery is abundant. The current Dutch guideline requires a minimum volume of 20 annual procedures per centre. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes using data from the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit. METHODS: This was a nationwide study in the Netherlands. All liver resections reported in the Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit between 2014 and 2017 were included. Annual centre volume was calculated and classified in categories of 20 procedures per year. Main outcomes were major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIA or higher) and 30-day or in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 5590 liver resections were done across 34 centres with a median annual centre volume of 35 (i.q.r. 20-69) procedures. Overall major morbidity and mortality rates were 11·2 and 2·0 per cent respectively. The mortality rate was 1·9 per cent after resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), 1·2 per cent for non-CRLMs, 0·4 per cent for benign tumours, 4·9 per cent for hepatocellular carcinoma and 10·3 per cent for biliary tumours. Higher-volume centres performed more major liver resections, and more resections for hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer. There was no association between hospital volume and either major morbidity or mortality in multivariable analysis, after adjustment for known risk factors for adverse events. CONCLUSION: Hospital volume and postoperative outcomes were not associated.


ANTECEDENTES: La asociación entre el volumen hospitalario y los resultados de la cirugía hepática no está clara. Según la recomendación actual de las guías holandesas se requiere un volumen mínimo de 20 procedimientos anuales por centro. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la asociación entre el volumen hospitalario con los resultados postoperatorios en la auditoría hepatobiliar obligatoria holandesa a nivel nacional. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio a nivel nacional en los Países Bajos. Se incluyeron todas las resecciones hepáticas registradas en la auditoría hepatobiliar holandesa entre 2014 y 2017. El volumen anual del centro se calculó y se clasificó en categorías de 20 procedimientos por año. Los objetivos principales fueron la morbilidad de mayor grado (Clavien-Dindo grado IIIA o superior) y la mortalidad hospitalaria o la mortalidad a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron un total de 5.590 resecciones en 34 centros con una mediana (rango intercuartílico) de volumen anual de 35 procedimientos (20-69). La tasa global de morbilidad mayor fue del 11% y la mortalidad del 2%. La mortalidad fue de 1,9% después de la resección por metástasis hepáticas colorrectales (colorectal liver metastases, CRLM), 1,2% para no CRLM, 0,4% para tumores benignos, 4,9% para carcinoma hepatocelular, y 10,3% para tumores biliares. Los centros de mayor volumen realizaron más resecciones hepáticas mayores y más resecciones por carcinoma hepatocelular y cáncer biliar. En el análisis multivariable después de ajustar por factores de riesgo conocidos de eventos adversos, no se observó ninguna asociación entre el volumen hospitalario y la morbilidad o mortalidad mayor. CONCLUSIÓN: No hubo asociación entre el volumen hospitalario y los resultados postoperatorios de la cirugía hepática en los Países Bajos.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Br J Surg ; 106(4): 458-466, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811050

RESUMEN

This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 447 patients with Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses, who were treated with antibiotics, with or without percutaneous drainage. Abscesses of 3 and 5 cm in size were at higher risk of short-term treatment failure and emergency surgery respectively. Initial non-surgical treatment of Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses was comparable between patients treated with antibiotics only and those who underwent percutaneous drainage in combination with antibiotics, with regard to short- and long-term outcomes. Most do not need drainage.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Diverticulitis del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Absceso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 32(12)2019 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31220859

RESUMEN

The standard of care for gastroesophageal cancer patients with hepatic or pulmonary metastases is best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy. Occasionally, patients can be selected for curative treatment instead. This study aimed to evaluate patients who underwent a resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastasis with curative intent. The Dutch national registry for histo- and cytopathology was used to identify these patients. Data were retrieved from the individual patient files. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Between 1991 and 2016, 32,057 patients received a gastrectomy or esophagectomy for gastroesophageal cancer in the Netherlands. Of these patients, 34 selected patients received a resection of hepatic metastasis (n = 19) or pulmonary metastasis (n = 15) in 21 different hospitals. Only 4 patients received neoadjuvant therapy before metastasectomy. The majority of patients had solitary, metachronous metastases. After metastasectomy, grade 3 (Clavien-Dindo) complications occurred in 7 patients and mortality in 1 patient. After resection of hepatic metastases, the median potential follow-up time was 54 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 28 months and the 1-, 3-, and 5- year OS was 84%, 41%, and 31%, respectively. After pulmonary metastases resection, the median potential follow-up time was 80 months. The median OS was not reached and the 1-, 3-, and 5- year OS was 67%, 53%, and 53%, respectively. In selected patients with gastroesophageal cancer with hepatic or pulmonary metastases, metastasectomy was performed with limited morbidity and mortality and offered a 5-year OS of 31-53%. Further prospective studies are required.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Metastasectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Br J Surg ; 105(6): 637-644, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29493785

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy construction is a common procedure but can be associated with morbidity. The stoma is commonly secured to the skin using transcutaneous sutures. It is hypothesized that intracutaneous sutures result in a tighter adherence of the peristomal skin to the stoma plate to prevent faecal leakage. The study aimed to compare the effect of intracutaneous versus transcutaneous suturing of ileostomies on faecal leakage and quality of life. METHODS: This randomized trial was undertaken in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients scheduled to receive an ileostomy for any reason were randomized to intracutaneous or transcutaneous suturing (IC and TC groups respectively). The primary outcome was faecal leakage. Secondary outcomes were stoma-related quality of life and costs of stoma-related materials and reinterventions. RESULTS: Between April 2011 and February 2016, 339 patients were randomized to the IC (170) or TC (169) group. Leakage rates were higher in the IC than in the TC group (52·4 versus 41·4 per cent respectively; risk difference 11·0 (95 per cent c.i. 0·3 to 21·2) per cent). Skin irritation rates were high (78·2 versus 72·2 per cent), but did not differ significantly between the groups (risk difference 6·1 (95 per cent c.i. -3·2 to 15·10) per cent). There were no significant differences in quality of life or costs between the groups. CONCLUSION: Intracutaneous suturing of an ileostomy is associated with more peristomal leakage than transcutaneous suturing. Overall stoma-related complications did not differ between the two techniques. Registration number: NTR2369 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).


Asunto(s)
Ileostomía/métodos , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas/efectos adversos
9.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 450, 2018 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29678145

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Initial staging of gastric cancer consists of computed tomography (CT) and gastroscopy. In locally advanced (cT3-4) gastric cancer, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (FDG-PET/CT or PET) and staging laparoscopy (SL) may have a role in staging, but evidence is scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of PET and SL in addition to initial staging in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study will include all patients with a surgically resectable, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (cT3-4b, N0-3, M0), that are scheduled for treatment with curative intent after initial staging with gastroscopy and CT. The modalities to be investigated in this study is the addition of PET and SL. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients in whom the PET or SL lead to a change in treatment strategy. Secondary outcome parameters are: diagnostic performance, morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of these additional diagnostic modalities. The study recently started in August 2017 with a duration of 36 months. At least 239 patients need to be included in this study to demonstrate that the diagnostic modalities are break-even. Based on the annual number of gastrectomies in the participating centers, it is estimated that approximately 543 patients are included in this study. DISCUSSION: In this study, it is hypothesized that performing PET and SL for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinomas results in a change of treatment strategy in 27% of patients and an annual cost-reduction in the Netherlands of €916.438 in this patient group by reducing futile treatment. The results of this study may be applicable to all countries with comparable treatment algorithms and health care systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03208621 . This trial was registered prospectively on June 30, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Flujo de Trabajo
10.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(10): 881-887, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679514

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch translation of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in a population of Dutch rectal cancer patients. METHOD: Patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer received the LARS score questionnaire, a single quality of life (QoL) category question and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A subgroup of patients received the LARS score twice to assess the test-retest reliability. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included in the analysis, identified in six Dutch centres. The response rate was 62.0%. The percentage of patients who reported 'major LARS' was 59.4%. There was a high proportion of patients with a perfect or moderate fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score, showing a good convergent validity. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients with or without neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.003), between total and partial mesorectal excision (P = 0.008) and between age groups (P = 0.039). There was a statistically significant association between a higher LARS score and an impaired function on the global QoL subscale and the physical, role, emotional and social functioning subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The test-retest reliability of the LARS score was good, with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The good psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the LARS score are comparable overall to the earlier validations in other countries. Therefore, the Dutch translation can be considered to be a valid tool for assessing LARS in Dutch rectal cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Síndrome , Traducciones
11.
Br J Surg ; 104(2): e151-e157, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28121041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients who have surgery for acute cholecystitis receive postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, with the intent to reduce infectious complications. There is, however, no evidence that extending antibiotics beyond a single perioperative dose is advantageous. This study aimed to determine the effect of extended antibiotic prophylaxis on infectious complications in patients with mild acute cholecystitis undergoing cholecystectomy. METHODS: For this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, adult patients with mild acute calculous cholecystitis undergoing cholecystectomy at six major teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, between April 2012 and September 2014, were assessed for eligibility. Patients were randomized to either a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (2000 mg), or antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 days after surgery (intravenous cefuroxime 750 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg, three times daily), in addition to the single dose. The primary endpoint was rate of infectious complications within 30 days after operation. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, three of 77 patients (4 per cent) in the extended antibiotic group and three of 73 (4 per cent) in the standard prophylaxis group developed postoperative infectious complications (absolute difference 0·2 (95 per cent c.i. -8·2 to 8·9) per cent). Based on a margin of 5 per cent, non-inferiority of standard prophylaxis compared with extended prophylaxis was not proven. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days in the extended antibiotic group and 1 day in the standard prophylaxis group. CONCLUSION: Standard single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis did not lead to an increase in postoperative infectious complications in patients with mild acute cholecystitis undergoing cholecystectomy. Registration number: NTR3089 (www.trialregister.nl).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cefazolina/administración & dosificación , Cefuroxima/administración & dosificación , Colecistectomía , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 513, 2016 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer surgery is accompanied with high morbidity and poor long term functional outcome. Screening programs have shown a shift towards more early staged cancers. Patients with early rectal cancer can potentially benefit significantly from rectal preserving therapy. For the earliest stage cancers, local excision is sufficient when the risk of lymph node disease and subsequent recurrence is below 5 %. However, the majority of early cancers are associated with an intermediate risk of lymph node involvement (5-20 %) suggesting that local excision alone is not sufficient, while completion radical surgery, which is currently standard of care, could be a substantial overtreatment for this group of patients. METHODS/STUDY DESIGN: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with an intermediate risk T1-2 rectal cancer, that has been locally excised using an endoluminal technique, will be randomized between adjuvant chemo-radiotherapylimited to the mesorectum and standard completion total mesorectal excision (TME). To strictly monitor the risk of locoregional recurrence in the experimental arm and enable early salvage surgery, there will be additional follow up with frequent MRI and endoscopy. The primary outcome of the study is three-year local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes are morbidity, disease free and overall survival, stoma rate, functional outcomes, health related quality of life and costs. The design is a non inferiority study with a total sample size of 302 patients. DISCUSSION: The results of the TESAR trial will potentially demonstrate that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an oncological safe treatment option in patients who are confronted with the difficult clinical dilemma of a radically removed intermediate risk early rectal cancer by polypectomy or transanal surgery that is conventionally treated with subsequent radical surgery. Preserving the rectum using adjuvant radiotherapy is expected to significantly improve morbidity, function and quality of life if compared to completion TME surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02371304 , registration date: February 2015.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Colectomía , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos
13.
Colorectal Dis ; 18(8): O267-77, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27332897

RESUMEN

AIM: Prehabilitation, defined as enhancement of the preoperative condition of a patient, is a possible strategy for improving postoperative outcome. Lack of muscle strength and poor physical condition, increasingly prevalent in older patients, are risk factors for postoperative complications. Eighty-five per cent of patients with colorectal cancer are aged over 60 years. Since surgery is the cornerstone of their treatment, this review systemically examined the literature on the effect of physical prehabilitation in older patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHOD: Trials and case-control studies investigating the effect of physical prehabilitation in patients over 60 years undergoing colorectal surgery were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane library. Patient characteristics, the type of intervention and outcome measurements were recorded. The risk of bias and heterogeneity was assessed. RESULTS: Five studies including 353 patients were identified. They were small, containing an average of 77 patients and were of moderate methodological quality. Compliance rates of the prehabilitation programme varied from 16 to 97%. None of the studies could identify a significant reduction of postoperative complications or length of hospital stay. Four studies showed physical improvement (walking distance, respiratory endurance) in the prehabilitation group. Clinical heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation is a possible means of enhancing the physical condition of patients preoperatively. The quality of studies in older patients undergoing colorectal surgery is poor, despite the increase in elderly people with colorectal cancer. Defining specific patient groups at risk and standardizing the outcome are essential for improving the results of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Anciano , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Resistencia Física , Prueba de Paso
14.
Br J Surg ; 101(6): 701-6, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24676735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In colonic cancer, the number of harvested lymph nodes is associated with prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of small lymph nodes to pathological staging, and to analyse the hypothesis that node size is a confounder in the relationship between prognosis and nodal harvest. METHODS: Nodal harvest and size were analysed in patients who underwent elective surgery for colonic cancer. Visible and palpable nodes were harvested without fat clearance techniques, and conventional histology was performed. RESULTS: Metastases were found in 99 of 2043 measured lymph nodes in 150 patients. Lymph nodes smaller than 3 mm were positive in 8.0 per cent of patients (12 of 150), but were the sole reason for upstaging in only 1.3 per cent (2 of 150). No metastases were found among 95 nodes of 1 mm or less. Metastatic nodes were larger than those without metastasis (median (i.q.r.) 5.0 (3.2-7.0) versus 3.8 (2.4-5.2) mm; P < 0·001), but a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve did not identify a relevant cut-off point to predict metastatic involvement. A hazard ratio of 0.71 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.50 to 1.01) was suggestive of an association between disease recurrence and increased node size, although not significant (P = 0.056). In patients with N0 disease, there was a correlation between node size and harvest (Pearson's correlation 0.317, P = 0.002), and a nodal yield of at least 12 was associated with a larger median node size (4.3 (3.3-5.0) versus 3.4 (2.7-4.0) mm; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The contribution of lymph nodes smaller than 3 mm to nodal staging is limited. Increased node size is associated with increased nodal yield, and could be a confounder in the relationship between prognosis and nodal harvest in patients with N0 disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tamaño de los Órganos , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Colorectal Dis ; 16(10): O360-6, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24629060

RESUMEN

AIM: Nitric oxide donors, such as isosorbide dinitrate ointment (ISDN), are considered as first-choice agents in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Injection with botulinum toxin A in the internal anal sphincter is often used as a second-line therapy, although it may give better results and fewer side effects than nitric oxide donors. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate whether botulinum toxin A (Dysport) is more effective than ISDN in the primary treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHOD: From April 2005 until October 2009, 60 patients (32 men) with a median age of 42 (25-82) years were randomized to receive either ISDN 10 mg/ml (1%) (n = 33) or injection with 60 units of Dysport (n = 27). The primary end-point was the percentage of complete fissure healing after 8 weeks. RESULTS: After a median of 9 weeks complete fissure healing was noted in 18 of 27 patients in the Dysport group and in 11 of 33 patients in the ISDN group (P = 0.010). Absolute improvement of pain scores after 9 weeks was similar in both groups (P = 0.733). Patients treated with Dysport had fewer side effects than patients treated with ISDN (P = 0.028). Of the patients with a healed fissure, 28% of the Dysport group and 50% of the ISDN group had a recurrence within 1 year (P = 0.286; hazard ratio 2.08; 95% CI = 0.54-7.97). CONCLUSION: Dysport is more effective than ISDN ointment and has fewer side effects in the primary treatment of chronic anal fissure. The recurrence rate within 1 year in both treatment groups is high.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Fisura Anal/tratamiento farmacológico , Dinitrato de Isosorbide/uso terapéutico , Donantes de Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canal Anal , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Fisura Anal/complicaciones , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pomadas , Dolor/etiología , Recurrencia
17.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(3): 570-581, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34629224

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal cancer surgery is associated with considerable morbidity in older patients. Assessment of preoperative physical status is therefore essential. The aim of this review was to describe and compare the objective physical tests that are currently used in abdominal cancer surgery in the older patient population with regard to postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched until 31 December 2020. Non-interventional cohort studies were eligible if they included patients ≥65 years undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, reported results on objective preoperative physical assessment such as Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET), field walk tests or muscle strength, and on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: 23 publications were included (10 CPET, 13 non-CPET including Timed Up & Go, grip strength, 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT)). Meta-analysis was precluded due to heterogeneity between study cohorts, different cut-off points, and inconsistent reporting of outcomes. In CPET studies, ventilatory anaerobic threshold and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production gradient were associated with adverse outcomes. ISWT and 6MWT predicted outcomes in two studies. Tests addressing muscle strength and function were of limited value. No study compared different physical tests. DISCUSSION: CPET has the ability to predict adverse postoperative outcomes, but it is time-consuming and requires expert assessment. ISWT or 6MWT might be a feasible alternative to estimate aerobic capacity. Muscle strength and function tests currently have limited value in risk prediction. Future research should compare the predictive value of different physical instruments with regard to postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Anciano , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Humanos , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Prueba de Paso
18.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(9): 1882-1894, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35599137

RESUMEN

The optimal surgical treatment strategy for gastric cancer in older patients needs to be carefully evaluated due to increased vulnerability of older patients. We performed a database search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that included patients ≥70 years with potentially resectable stage I-III gastric cancer. Postoperative and survival outcomes were compared between groups undergoing 1) gastrectomy vs conservative treatment (best supportive care or non-operative treatment), 2) minimally invasive (MIG) vs open gastrectomy (OG), or 3) extended vs limited lymphadenectomy. When possible, results were pooled using risk ratios (RR). Thirty-one studies were included. Six retrospective studies compared overall survival (OS) between gastrectomy (N = 2332) and conservative treatment (N = 246). Longer OS was reported in the gastrectomy group in all studies, but study quality was low and meta-analysis was not feasible. Eighteen cohort studies compared MIG (N = 3626) and OG (N = 5193). MIG was associated with fewer complications (pooled RR 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.84). OS was not different between the groups. Two RCTs and five cohort studies compared outcomes between extended (N = 709) and limited lymphadenectomy (N = 1323). Complication rates were comparable between the groups. Two cohort studies found longer OS or cancer-specific survival after extended lymphadenectomy. No quality of life (QoL) or functional outcomes were reported. In older patients with gastric cancer, there is low-quality evidence for better OS after gastrectomy vs conservative treatment. Compared to OG, MIG was associated with less postoperative morbidity. The evidence to support extended lymphadenectomy is limited. QoL and functional outcomes should be addressed in future studies.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(2): 348-355, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34366174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the impact of nationwide centralization of surgery on travel distance and travel burden among patients with oesophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer according to age in the Netherlands. As centralization of care increases to improve postoperative outcomes, travel distance and experienced burden might increase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2017 for oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancer in the Netherlands were included. Travel distance between patient's home address and hospital of surgery in kilometres was calculated. Questionnaires were used to assess experienced travel burden in a subpopulation (n = 239). Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors for longer travel distance. RESULTS: Over 23,838 patients were included, in whom median travel distance for surgical care increased for oesophageal cancer (n = 9217) from 18 to 28 km, for gastric cancer (n = 6743) from 9 to 26 km, and for pancreatic cancer (n = 7878) from 18 to 25 km (all p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses showed an increase in travel distance for all cancer types over time. In general, patients experienced a physical and social burden, and higher financial costs, due to traveling extra kilometres. Patients aged >70 years travelled less often independently (56% versus 68%), as compared to patients aged ≤70 years. CONCLUSION: With nationwide centralization, travel distance increased for patients undergoing oesophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer surgery. Younger patients travelled longer distances and experienced a lower travel burden, as compared to elderly patients. Nevertheless, on a global scale, travel distances in the Netherlands remain limited.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Oncología Quirúrgica/organización & administración , Viaje , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Planificación Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 13(6): 796-802, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35599096

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Older patients have a higher risk for complications after rectal cancer surgery. Although screening for geriatric impairments may improve risk prediction in this group, it has not been studied previously. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients ≥70 years with elective surgery for non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2014 and 2018 in nine Dutch hospitals. The predictive value of six geriatric parameters in combination with standard preoperative predictors was studied for postoperative complications, delirium, and length of stay (LOS) using logistic regression analyses. The geriatric parameters included the four VMS-questionnaire items pertaining to functional impairment, fall risk, delirium risk, and malnutrition, as well as mobility problems and polypharmacy. Standard predictors included age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-classification, comorbidities, tumor stage, and neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in model performance were evaluated by comparing Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the regression models with and without geriatric parameters. RESULTS: We included 575 patients (median age 75 years; 32% female). None of the geriatric parameters improved risk prediction for complications or LOS. The addition of delirium risk to the standard preoperative prediction model improved model performance for predicting postoperative delirium (AUC 0.75 vs 0.65, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric parameters did not improve risk prediction for postoperative complications or LOS in older patients with rectal cancer. Delirium risk screening using the VMS-questionnaire improved risk prediction for delirium. Older patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery are a pre-selected group with few impairments. Geriatric screening may have additional value earlier in the care pathway before treatment decisions are made.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias del Recto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/etiología , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA