Central nervous system prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphoma: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper.

This Good Practice Paper provides recommendations for the baseline investigation, risk stratification and use of prophylactic interventions for patients with large B-cell lymphoma at risk of central nervous system relapse. Recent evidence which has questioned the role of high-dose methotrexate in this clinical scenario is discussed in detail.

CNS prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphomas: A balance with three pans.

Given the significant limitations of available literature, central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphomas remains debatable. Wilson and colleagues provide cautious recommendations, on a case-by-case basis, useful to guide discussion with individual patient. In daily practice, CNS relapse risk, prophylaxis safety and prognosis of CNS recurrence must be considered. Commentary on: Wilson et al. Central nervous system prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphoma: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19686.

Superior prognostic accuracy of FIGO staging system in primary female genital tract lymphomas: A retrospective study (IELSG35).

Primary lymphoma of the female genital tract (PLFGT) is a rare type of extranodal lymphoma. In this retrospective study from the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group, we analyzed clinical data from 60 women diagnosed with PLFGT between 1982 and 2012. The median age was 52 years. Limited stage, as defined by the Ann Arbor and FIGO staging systems, was observed in 55% and 63% of cases, respectively. The uterus was the primary site of lymphoma in 25 cases, with the ovaries as the second most common site (n = 24). The most common histological subtype was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 44), followed by follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma (6 patients each). Two patients received surgery alone as first-line therapy, while 58 underwent systemic therapy, 16 following major surgery. Thirteen patients received consolidation radiotherapy and six were given central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis. Twenty patients had disease progression or recurrence. Six patients with DLBCL (14%) experienced CNS relapse, which was the only site of recurrence in five of them. All but one patient with CNS relapse had primary ovarian involvement, and three had bulky disease; none of these patients had received CNS prophylaxis. With a median follow-up of 60 months, the median overall survival of the DLBCL cohort was approximately 13 years, with a 5-year survival rate of 77%. In multivariable analysis, advanced disease according to the FIGO system was the only parameter significantly associated with shorter overall, cause-specific, and progression-free survival in patients with DLBCL.

Central nervous system lymphomas-Assessment and treatment and prevention of central nervous system relapse.

In this review focused on lymphoma and the central nervous system (CNS), we summarize recent developments in the management of primary (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL), treatment of CNS lymphoma in the older population, the neuroradiological assessment of CNS lymphoma and finally highlight the ongoing debate on optimal CNS prophylaxis. The section on PCNSL focuses on the different approaches available for frontline treatment in Europe and the United States and discusses consolidation strategies. We then highlight available strategies to treat PCNSL in the elderly population, an area of unmet need. New therapies aiming at minimizing toxicity and prioritizing quality of life are emerging for these patients. Secondary CNS lymphoma, especially in the relapsed/refractory setting is another area of unmet need, and the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy is being explored. We provide an overview of the imaging challenges in the neuroradiological assessment of CNS lymphoma. Finally, the section on CNS prophylaxis summarizes recent findings from large retrospective studies challenging the efficacy of present approaches to prophylaxis in higher-risk patients with lymphoma.

Neuro-meningeal relapse in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: incidence, risk factors and prognosis - a report from the European intergroup for childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Relapses involving the central nervous system (CNS) are rare in children and adolescents with ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) treated with regimens including CNS prophylaxis. Early identification of patients at high-risk for CNS relapse would enable stratification and better adaptation of initial treatment especially in the light of the upcoming targeted therapies with limited CNS penetration. We analyzed clinical and histological data of all ALK+ALCL patients with CNS relapse registered in ALCL99-database with the aim to describe risk factors and outcome. Characteristics of patients with no relapse, relapse without CNS involvement and CNS relapse were compared. At a median follow-up of 8 years (0.05-18 years), a CNS involvement was reported at first or subsequent relapse in 26/618 patients. Median interval between initial diagnosis and first CNS relapse was 8 months (IQR 5.55-10.61/range 1.31-130.69). The 5-year cumulative risk of CNS relapse was 4% (95% CI 2.9-5.5). Bone marrow involvement, peripheral blasts and CNS involvement at diagnosis were more frequent in patients with CNS relapse than in patients with no relapse or with relapse with no CNS involvement. The treatment of CNS relapse was heterogeneous. The median survival after CNS relapse was 23.7 months. Eleven patients were alive at last follow-up. Three-year overall survival after CNS relapse was 48.70% (95% CI 30.52-67.23).

Ambulatory high-dose methotrexate administration as central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with aggressive lymphoma.

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) at 3 g/m2 is one of the strategies for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in the first-line treatment of aggressive lymphomas, especially in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients with high-risk CNS-International Prognostic Index. The objective of our study was to retrospectively analyze the safety of 2 cycles of systemic HD-MTX administered as an ambulatory regimen. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 103 patients were carefully selected on 6 criteria, including age < 60, albumin > 34, performance status 0 or 1, normal renal and hepatic functions, good understanding of practical medical guidance, and no loss of weight. Strict procedures of HD-MTX infusion were observed including alkalinization, urine pH monitoring, and leucovorin rescue. Renal and hepatic functions were monitored at days 2 and 7. MTX clearance was not monitored. Toxicities and grades of toxicity were collected according to the NCI-CTCAE (version 4.0). Among the 103 selected patients, 92 (89%) patients successfully completed the planned 2 cycles of HD-MTX on an outpatient basis. Eleven patients completed only 1 cycle, 3 because of lymphoma progression and 8 because of toxicity including 3 grade II hepatotoxicity, 2 grade I/II renal toxicity, 1 grade III neutropenia, 1 active herpetic infection, and 1 grade III ileus reflex. Reported adverse events (AE) included 92 (84%) grade I/II and 18 (16%) grade III/IV. Grade III hepatotoxicity, mostly cytolysis, was the most frequent AE observed with 8 (8%) events. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicities concerned 9 patients with 8 grade III/IV neutropenia and 1 thrombocytopenia. Renal toxicity was rare, mild, and transient, observed with 4 (4%) grade I/II events. Ambulatory administration of HD-MTX at 3 g/m2 without MTX clearance monitoring is safe with strict medical guidance. It requires careful selection of patients before administration, and a renal and hepatic monitoring after the administration.

Long-term brain status and cognitive impairment in children treated for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with and without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess long-term consequences of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in patients with high-risk ALL (HR-ALL) treated according to ALL IC-BFM 2002 and to compare observed abnormalities in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with those who received only prophylactic CNS irradiation (12 Gy) and with control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 29 patients with HR-ALL in CR1 after treatment according to protocol ALL IC-BFM 2002 (14 with allo-HSCT conditioned with fractionated total body irradiation [FTBI] and 15 without HSCT) and 16 children with newly diagnosed ALL (control group). The median time from therapy completion to evaluation was 5 years. To assess brain status, volumetric T1-weighted sequences of magnetic resonance imaging were used. Neuropsychological assessment based on battery neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: Transplanted patients had significantly lower volumes of white and gray matter (P = .048 and P < .001) and also of subcortical structures, including the thalamus (P < .001), the hippocampus (P = .007), the putamen (P = .011), the globus pallidus (P = .001), and the accumbens (P < .001). In addition, these patients had generally lower cognitive performance, especially in vocabulary (P = .011), visuospatial ability (P = .047), executive functions and attention (P = .034; P = .002; P = .048), and processing speed (P = .049 and P = .037). The thalamus volume is correlated with neuropsychological performance in verbal functions (P < .001), executive functions (P < .001 and P = .024), and processing speed (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients treated for ALL, FTBI-based preparative regimen preceding allo-HSCT causes reduction of subcortical structure volumes and decline in cognitive performance. The observed long-term structural and functional CNS sequelae are significantly more pronounced in transplanted HR-ALL patients than in those treated with prophylactic CNS- radiotherapy only.

Central Nervous System Prophylaxis Strategies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is an undesirable event in the course of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a median survival of approximately 6 months following CNS relapse. CNS prophylaxis for the prevention of CNS recurrence, in addition to the standard R-CHOP chemotherapy, is thus preferable. For an overall relapse risk of 2-5%, administration of CNS-directed therapies for all patients with DLBCL is unnecessary and prophylaxis should be targeted for the high-risk patients. CNS-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) score has enabled risk stratification with risk ranging < 1% (low-risk group) compared to > 10% (high-risk group). The latter could be considered for CNS prophylaxis. CNS-IPI, however, is not perfect and may not capture patients with high-risk extra-nodal sites such as testicular DLBCL. Cell-of-origin and MYC/BCL2 expression can further build on CNS-IPI to narrow higher risk patients. CNS prophylaxis strategies are controversial. Common strategies include intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and systemic CNS penetrants such as methotrexate. IT chemotherapy does not adequately penetrate the brain parenchyma and hence it is insufficient in preventing parenchymal CNS recurrences. Most experts promote systemic methotrexate for high-risk groups, which penetrates both the leptomeningeal and parenchymal CNS compartments. Even though systemic CNS prophylaxis is widely promoted over IT alone, its efficacy is unclear. Ongoing efforts in search for appropriate CNS prophylaxis strategies are warranted. My personal practice is to administer systemic high-dose methotrexate in conjunction with R-CHOP chemotherapy for eligible patients deemed at a high risk of CNS recurrence, especially those with high-risk CNS-IPI and extra-nodal involvement.

Secondary central nervous system relapse in diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a resource limited country: result from the Thailand nationwide multi-institutional registry.

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a serious and fatal complication of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Data on secondary CNS (SCNS) relapse were mostly obtained from western countries with limited data from developing countries. We analyzed the data of 2034 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients enrolled into the multi-center registry under Thai Lymphoma Study Group from setting. The incidence, September 2006 to December 2013 to represent outcome from a resource limited pattern, management, and outcome of SCNS relapse were described. The 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) of SCNS relapse was 2.7 %. A total of 729, 1024, and 281 patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk CNS international prognostic index (CNS-IPI) with corresponding 2-year CI of SCNS relapse of 1.5, 3.1, and 4.6 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated advance stage disease, poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, presence of B symptoms, more than one extranodal organ involvement, high IPI, and high CNS-IPI group as predictive factors for SCNS relapse. Rituximab exposure and intrathecal chemoprophylaxis offered no protective effect against SCNS relapse. At the time of analysis, six patients were alive. Median OS in SCNS relapsed patients was significantly shorter than relapsed patients without CNS involvement (13.2 vs 22.6 months) (p < 0.001). Primary causes of death were progressive disease (n = 35, 63.6 %) and infection (n = 9, 16.7 %). In conclusion, although the incidence of SCNS relapse in our cohort was low, the prognosis was dismal. Prophylaxis for SCNS involvement was underused even in high-risk patients. Novel approaches for SCNS relapse prophylaxis and managements are warranted.

Treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Taiwan: Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group ALL-2002 study emphasizing optimal reinduction therapy and central nervous system preventive therapy without cranial radiation.

BACKGROUND: Reinduction therapy has improved the outcomes in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We sought to determine the optimal course(s) of reinduction therapy for standard-risk (SR, or "low-risk" in other groups) patients. Also, we evaluated outcomes using triple intrathecal therapy without cranial radiation (CrRT) for central nervous system (CNS) preventive therapy. PROCEDURE: From 2002 to 2012, all newly diagnosed children with ALL in Taiwan were enrolled in Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group ALL-2002 protocol. SR patients were randomized to receive single or double reinduction courses. The patients enrolled before 2009 received CrRT, while those enrolled later did not. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates and the difference between two groups was compared by the two-sided log-rank test. RESULTS: In 1,366 eligible patients, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 81.6 ± 1.1% (standard error) and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 74.3 ± 1.2%. In SR patients, the 5-year OS for one and two reinduction courses was 91.6 ± 2.1% and 93.7 ± 1.8%, respectively, and the 5-year EFS was 85.2 ± 2.7% and 89.8 ± 2.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival between these two groups. Patients with MLL or BCR-ABL1 had the worst outcomes: 5-year EFS was 23.4 and 31.8% and 5-year OS was 28.6 and 44.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in CNS relapse or survival between the era with or without CrRT. CONCLUSIONS: For SR patients, one-course reinduction was adequate. Triple intrathecal therapy alone successfully prevented CNS relapse.

Long-term brain structural magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive functioning in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy alone or combined with CNS radiotherapy at reduced total dose to 12 Gy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term side effects of central nervous system prophylaxis (high-dose chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy and CNS radiotherapy) according to the ALL IC-BFM 2002. METHODS: Thirty-tree children aged 6.7-19.9 years have been studied. The control group consisted of 12 children newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We assessed subcortical gray matter volume using automatic MRI segmentation and cognitive performance to identify differences between two therapeutic schemes and patients prior to treatment. RESULTS: Patients treated with chemotherapy and CNS radiotherapy had smaller hippocampi than two other subgroups and lower IQ score than patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Both treated groups, whether with chemotherapy only or in combination with CNS radiotherapy, had significantly lower volumes of caudate nucleus and performed significantly worse on measures of verbal fluency in comparison with patients prior to treatment. There were no differences in the mean volumes of total white matter, total gray matter, thalamus, putamen, and amygdala between the studied groups. CONCLUSION: In all children treated according to the ALL IC-BFM 2002 with high-dose chemotherapy, both decreased volume of selected subcortical structures and cognitive impairment was observed, especially in children who received chemotherapy in combination with reduced dose CNS radiotherapy. In all children treated according to the ALL IC-BFM 2002 with high-dose chemotherapy, both decreased volume of selected subcortical structures and cognitive impairment were observed, especially in children who received chemotherapy in combination with CNS radiotherapy.

Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The use of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. Although uncommon, CNS relapses are invariably fatal in this otherwise curable disease. Accurate identification of patients at risk and the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis therefore remains an area of unmet need. The existing literature, largely retrospective in nature, provides mixed conclusions regarding the efficacy of CNS prophylaxis. The utility of CNS prophylaxis has itself been challenged. In this review, we dissect the issues which render the value of CNS prophylaxis uncertain. We first compare international clinical guidelines for CNS prophylaxis. We then interrogate the factors that should be used to identify high-risk patients accurately. We also explore how clinical patterns of CNS relapse have changed in the pre-rituximab and rituximab era. We then discuss the efficacy of CNS-directed approaches, intensification of systemic treatment and other novel approaches in CNS prophylaxis. Improved diagnostics for early detection of CNS relapses and newer therapeutics for CNS prophylaxis are areas of active investigation. In an area where prospective, randomized studies are impracticable and lacking, guidance for the use of CNS prophylaxis will depend on rigorous statistical review of retrospective data.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the breast: looking at pathogenesis, clinical issues and therapeutic options.

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with some distinct clinical features. The most common histopathological type is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but other less frequent subtypes are also encountered. In this review, we describe the characteristics of primary breast DLBCL, with emphasis on pathogenesis, staging, risk stratification and prognosis. In addition, key issues regarding therapy and various available therapeutic modalities are addressed, as well as the role of rituximab in therapy and whether central nervous system prophylaxis is still routinely required. There are very few prospective clinical studies addressing therapy, and available data rely mostly on retrospective case series involving small numbers of patients. Our conclusions and proposed recommendations are therefore not offered as formal guidelines. This review attempts to represent an unbiased analysis of the published data and is intended as a useful aid for clinicians treating this uncommon type of extra nodal lymphoma.

Central nervous system prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: What does the evidence tell us?

Secondary involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare yet often catastrophic event for DLBCL patients. As standard first-line therapy for DLBCL with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, one approach to lessen the risk of CNS relapse has been to include additional agents, primarily methotrexate, directed at the CNS with standard R-CHOP although the timing, dose, and mode of administration differs widely across treating physicians. This practice derives from decades of non-randomized, often retrospective data with inconsistent outcomes. The current available tools and risk models are imprecise in their ability to predict which patients are truly at risk of secondary CNS relapse and more recent, large-scale real-world analyses call into question these longstanding practices. In a field lacking any prospective, randomized studies, this review synthesizes the available data investigating the utility of CNS prophylaxis in patients with DLBCL receiving 1st line therapy.

Prophylaxis strategies containing high dose intravenous methotrexate on preventing CNS relapse for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at intermediate to high risk: A study based on 12 cohorts in the rituximab era.

During the Rituximab era, high dose intravenous methotrexate (HD) and intrathecal methotrexate (IT) are recommended prophylaxis in preventing central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, the optimal CNS prophylaxis strategies remained uncertain. This meta-analysis research explored the findings of previous studies and highlighted the efficacy of HD and/or IT on CNS prophylaxis of DLBCL patients at intermediate to high risk. Specifically, it aims to answer the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference on CNS relapse rate between HD and IT cohorts? (2) Is there a correlation between CNS prophylaxis and survival? This meta-analysis research performed an in-depth examination of pertinent studies available in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints included: CNS relapse rate and 2-year or 3-year survival rate. The findings of the qualified studies were reviewed and analyzed using 5.3 version of the Review Manager software. After thorough analysis of 12 studies involving 5950 DLBCL patients, it was revealed that in comparison with IT alone, HD with or without additional IT (HD ± IT) significantly reduced the risk of CNS relapse (Risk Ratio (RR)= 0.41, 95 % CI (0.24-0.68), P = 0.0007). Besides, the efficacy of HD alone was comparable to HD + IT (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI (0.19-6.32), P = 0.93), which was also considered to be more optimal than IT alone on CNS prophylaxis (RR = 0.39, 95 % CI (0.15-1.06), P = 0.06).Based on these results, IT alone or no-prophylaxis were viewed as a group of inadequate prophylaxis. Comparing to HD ± IT, the 3-year survival rate of inadequate prophylaxis group was lower (RR = 1.17, 95 % CI (1.03-1.32), P = 0.01). The results of this study reveals that in the Rituximab Era, prophylaxis strategies containing HD is better than IT alone or no-prophylaxis on preventing CNS relapse of DLBCL patients with intermediate to high risk.

Infiltration of Bilateral Optic Nerves in Burkitt Lymphoma: A Case Report.

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is one of the highly aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas. The optic nerve can be affected in case of isolated lymphoma or together with the central nervous system (CNS) and systemic lymphoma. We report a rare case of involvement of bilateral optic nerves in BL. A 31-year-old lady who was diagnosed with BL presented with severe intermittent headache and vomiting with blurring of vision in both eyes for one week. Visual acuity on presentation was 6/9 in the right eye and 6/24 in the left eye, with a reduction of the left eye optic nerve functions. Fundoscopy showed swollen optic disc in the right eye and temporal pallor disc in the left. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbit showed increased leptomeningeal enhancement in the right frontal and temporal lobes and the right optic nerve. Lumbar puncture revealed high opening pressure (50 cmH2O). Pleocytosis and the presence of lymphomatous infiltration were noted in cerebrospinal fluid analysis. After the completion of four cycles of chemotherapy, her condition unfortunately deteriorated, and she was subsequently planned for palliative therapy. CNS-directed therapies should be considered given the high risk of CNS relapse.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Prophylaxis and Management of Secondary CNS Lymphoma.

Secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) is a rare but frequently fatal complication of systemic lymphoma. There is no standard treatment for SCNSL, and patients who develop SCNSL at diagnosis or after frontline therapy often receive highly intensive chemotherapy regimens that are inactive against primary chemorefractory disease and too toxic for older, frail patients to tolerate. Because the prognosis of SCNSL is so poor, management has historically emphasized prevention, but the current methods of CNS prophylaxis are not universally effective. To improve both the prevention and management of SCNSL, better characterization of the molecular determinants of CNS invasion is needed. Novel treatments that are currently being studied in SCNSL include targeted pathway inhibitors and cellular therapy, but SCNSL patients are often excluded from clinical trials of promising new therapies.

Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas Involving the Central Nervous System: A Report From the Czech Lymphoma Study Group Registry.

Introduction: We analyzed the incidence, risk factors of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, and outcome of CNS involvement in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group Registry NiHiL (Clinical Trial gov. NCT03199066). Materials and Methods: Out of 1,040 patients with PTCL, we identified 29 patients (2.79%) with CNS involvement: 2 patients with primary CNS T cell lymphoma, 11 patients with CNS and systemic disease at diagnosis, and 16 patients (1.54%) at CNS relapse. The most common histology with CNS disease was PTCL, not otherwise specified. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval from diagnosis to progression or death. PFS-2 was defined as the interval from the date of a new relapse until the next relapse. Results: Patients with testicular involvement received intrathecal prophylaxis with methotrexate. High-dose methotrexate-based treatment was administered in 44.8% of patients with CNS disease. Median follow-up was 71.3 months. The difference between the median PFS of 1,027 patients without initial CNS disease (32.6 months) and 11 patients with initial CNS and systemic disease (4.8 months) was significant (p = 0.04). The difference between the median PFS2 in CNS relapses (10.1 months) and 493 relapses outside of CNS (9.1 months) was not significant (p = 0.6). Risk factors for CNS relapses included the following: involvement of more than one extranodal site (p = 0.008), soft tissue involvement (p = 0.003), testicular involvement (p = 0.046), and the presence of B symptoms (p = 0.035). The difference between the median OS of 1,027 patients without initial CNS disease (46.0 months) and 11 patients with initial CNS and systemic disease (18.2 months) was significant (p = 0.02). The median OS2 in CNS relapses was 11.8 months and that in relapses outside of CNS was 21.3 months. CNS involvement was not associated with a significantly worse OS compared to relapsed/refractory patients without CNS involvement (p = 0.1). Conclusions: The incidence of CNS disease at the time of diagnosis and at relapse in PTCL is low and usually associated with other systemic involvement. The prognosis of PTCL with initial CNS involvement is significantly worse when compared to patients without CNS disease at diagnosis. The outcome of CNS relapse is comparable with relapsed PTCL outside of CNS. The optimal treatment is not defined yet.

Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in antiCD20-CHOP treated DLBCL at intermediate to high risk for CNS relapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

CNS prophylaxis is commonly used in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with risk features for CNS relapse. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares CNS relapse rates with and without CNS prophylaxis, for patients at intermediate to high CNS relapse risk. Studies reporting CNS relapse risk category and CNS outcomes with and without CNS prophylaxis for antiCD20-CHOP treated DLBCL patients were included. 10 studies with 3770 patients at intermediate to high CNS relapse risk were analyzed. No significant difference in the pooled Absolute Risk Difference (ARD 0.01, 95 % CI -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.61) or Risk (RR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.81-1.83, P = 0.34) was noted in patients with and without CNS prophylaxis. There were also no differences within pre-specified subgroups of IV Methotrexate or IT chemotherapy. However, the quality of evidence supporting these observations was low. A meta-analysis of individual patient data will help evaluate the benefit of CNS prophylaxis strategies.