The Differential Impact of Early Graft Dysfunction in Kidney Donation After Brain Death and After Circulatory Death: Insights from the Dutch National Transplant Registry.

Kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) perform similarly to kidneys donated after brain death (DBD). However, the respective incidences of delayed graft function (DGF) differ. This questions the donor type-specific impact of early graft function on long-term outcome. Using competing risk and cox regression analysis, we compared death-censored graft loss between types of early graft function: DGF (temporary dialysis dependency started within seven days after transplantation), slow graft function (SGF, three-day plasma creatinine decline less than 10% per day), and immediate graft function (IGF). In 1061 DBD and 1605 DCD graft recipients (January 2014 until January 2023), graft survival was similar. DGF was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD and DCD (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR]: DGF in DBD: 1.79 [1.04- 2.91], p = 0.027, DGF in DCD: 1.84 [1.18 - 2.87], p = 0.008; Reference: no DGF). SGF was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD, but not significantly in DCD (aHR DBD: 2.82 (1.34 - 5.93), p = 0.007, and DCD: 1.54 (0.72 - 3.35), p = 0.262; Reference: IGF). Early graft dysfunction has a differential impact on graft outcome in DBD and DCD. The differences between DBD and DCD should be accounted for in research and the clinic.

Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients From the Same Donor Based on Donor-Recipient Sex Discordance.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients from the same donor with donor-recipient sex discordance have been studied with inconsistent results. METHODS: Adult DDKT where both kidneys from the same donor occurred at our center in two different recipients of different sexes were included. Outcomes were analyzed separately for male and female donors, based on the concordance or discordance between donor-recipient sex: Male-male (M-m) versus Male to female (M-f) or vice versa, F-f versus F-m. Acute rejection (AR) and uncensored graft failure were primary outcomes of interest. The univariate and multivariate risks for AR and graft failure were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 130 donors, 84 male and 46 female fulfilled our selection criteria and were transplanted in 260 recipients. With respect to the concordant groups (M-m or F-f), sex discordance was not significantly associated with the risk of rejection in multivariate analysis (M-f vs. M-m HR 1.15 [0.53-2.53, P = 0.72]; F-m vs. F-f HR 1.77 [0.71-4.39, P = 0.23]). Sex discordance was also not significantly associated with graft failure in multivariate analysis. Interestingly, risk factors for AR differed among male donors and female donors. The higher calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and nonwhite recipients were at increased risk for AR in F-m, but not in M-f. CONCLUSIONS: Donor-recipient sex discordance was not significantly associated with AR or graft failure. Risk factors for AR may differ across male and female donors.

The impact of donor diabetes on recipient postoperative complications, renal function, and survival rate in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a single-center analysis.

As the global incidence of diabetes rises and diagnoses among younger patients increase, transplant centers worldwide are encountering more organ donors with diabetes. This study examined 80 donors and 160 recipients, including 30 donors with diabetes (DD) and their 60 recipients (DDR). The control group comprised 50 non-diabetic donors (ND) and 100 recipients (NDR). We analyzed clinical, biochemical, and pathological data for both diabetic and control groups, using logistic regression to identify risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. Results showed that pre-procurement blood urea nitrogen levels were significantly higher in DD [18.20 ± 10.63 vs. 10.86 ± 6.92, p = 0.002] compared to ND. Renal pathological damage in DD was notably more severe, likely contributing to the higher DGF incidence in DDR compared to NDR. Although DDR had poorer renal function during the first three months post-transplant, both groups showed similar renal function thereafter. No significant differences were observed in 1-year or 3-year mortality rates or graft failure rates between DDR and NDR. Notably, according to the Renal Pathology Society (RPS) grading system, kidneys from diabetic donors with a grade > IIb are associated with significantly lower postoperative survival rates. Recipient gender [OR: 5.452 (1.330-22.353), p = 0.013] and pre-transplant PRA positivity [OR: 34.879 (7.698-158.030), p < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of DGF in DDR. In conclusion, transplant centers may consider utilizing kidneys from diabetic donors, provided they are evaluated pathologically, without adversely impacting recipient survival and graft failure rates.

An ex-ante cost-utility analysis of the deemed consent legislation compared to expressed consent for kidney transplantations in Nova Scotia.

BACKGROUND: This study was an ex-ante cost-utility analysis of deemed consent legislation for deceased organ donation in Nova Scotia, a province in Canada. The legislation became effective in January 2021. The study's objective was to assess the conditions necessary for the legislation change's cost-effectiveness compared to expressed consent, focusing on kidney transplantation (KT). METHOD: We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov model with a lifetime horizon. The study was from a Canadian payer perspective. The target population was patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Atlantic Canada waitlisted for KT. The intervention was the deemed consent and accompanying health system transformations. Expressed consent (before the change) was the comparator. We simulated the minimum required increase in deceased donor KT per year for the cost-effectiveness of the deemed consent. We also evaluated how changes in dialysis and maintenance immunosuppressant drug costs and living donor KT per year impacted cost-effectiveness in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The expected lifetime cost of an ESKD patient ranged from $177,663 to $553,897. In the deemed consent environment, the expected lifetime cost per patient depended on the percentage increases in the proportion of ESKD patients on the waitlist getting a KT in a year. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) increased with deceased donor KT per year. Cost-effectiveness of deemed consent compared to expressed consent required a minimum of a 1% increase in deceased donor KT per year. A 1% increase was associated with an ICUR of $32,629 per QALY (95% CI: - $64,279, $232,488) with a 81% probability of being cost-effective if the willingness-to-pay (WTP) was $61,466. Increases in dialysis and post-KT maintenance immunosuppressant drug costs above a threshold impacted value for money. The threshold for immunosuppressant drug costs also depended on the percent increases in deceased donor KT probability and the WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The deemed consent legislation in NS for deceased organ donation and the accompanying health system transformations are cost-effective to the extent that they are anticipated to contribute to more deceased donor KTs than before, and even a small increase in the proportion of waitlist patients receiving a deceased donor KT than before the change represents value for money.

Employment status at transplant influences ethnic disparities in outcomes after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: African American (AA) recipients of deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplants (KT) have shorter allograft survival than recipients of other ethnic groups. Reasons for this disparity encompass complex interactions between donors and recipients characteristics. METHODS: Outcomes from 3872 AA and 19,719 European American (EA) DDs who had one kidney transplanted in an AA recipient and one in an EA recipient were analyzed. Four donor/recipient pair groups (DRP) were studied, AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Survival random forests and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to rank and evaluate modifying effects of DRP on variables associated with allograft survival. These analyses sought to identify factors contributing to the observed disparities in transplant outcomes among AA and EA DDKT recipients. RESULTS: Transplant era, discharge serum creatinine, delayed graft function, and DRP were among the top predictors of allograft survival and mortality among DDKT recipients. Interaction effects between DRP with the kidney donor risk index and transplant era showed significant improvement in allograft survival over time in EA recipients. However, AA recipients appeared to have similar or poorer outcomes for DDKT performed after 2010 versus before 2001; allograft survival hazard ratios (95% CI) were 1.15 (0.74, 1.76) and 1.07 (0.8, 1.45) for AA/AA and EA/AA, compared to 0.62 (0.54, 0.71) and 0.5 (0.41, 0.62) for EA/EA and AA/EA DRP, respectively. Recipient mortality improved over time among all DRP, except unemployed AA/AAs. Relative to DDKT performed pre-2001, employed AA/AAs had HR = 0.37 (0.2, 0.69) versus 0.59 (0.31, 1.11) for unemployed AA/AA after 2010. CONCLUSION: Relative to DDKT performed before 2001, similar or worse overall DCAS was observed among AA/AAs, while EA/EAs experienced considerable improvement regardless of employment status, KDRI, and EPTS. AA recipients of an AA DDKT, especially if unemployed, had worse allograft survival and mortality and did not appear to benefit from advances in care over the past 20 years.

Successful deceased donor kidney transplantation to a recipient with a history of COVID-19 treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old Asian male, who had undergone hemodialysis for >16 years, complained of a fever, dysgeusia and dysosmia, and was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia based on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 PCR) and computed tomography (CT). Treatment was started with oral favipiravir and ciclesonide inhalation. On the 10th day of treatment, the patient had a persistent high fever and a chest CT showed exacerbation of pneumonia, so dexamethasone was intravenously started. He was discharged after confirming two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. Three months after COVID-19 treatment, a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was negative and he underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation. Basiliximab induction with triple drug immunosuppression consisting of extended-release tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone, which is our regular immunosuppression protocol, was used. He was discharged on postoperative day 18 without the need for postoperative hemodialysis or any complications. The serum creatinine level was 1.72 mg/dL 95 days postoperatively and he had a favorable clinical course that was similar to deceased donor kidney recipients without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: We report the first case of a kidney transplantation after COVID-19 treatment in Japan and the fourth case globally. We would like to provide information about our successful case due to the anticipated increase in similar candidates in the near future.

A nationwide evaluation of deceased donor kidney transplantation indicates detrimental consequences of early graft loss.

Early graft loss (EGL) is a feared outcome of kidney transplantation. Consequently, kidneys with an anticipated risk of EGL are declined for transplantation. In the most favorable scenario, with optimal use of available donor kidneys, the donor pool size is balanced by the risk of EGL, with a tradeoff dictated by the consequences of EGL. To gauge the consequence of EGL we systematically evaluated its impact in an observational study that included all 10,307 deceased-donor kidney transplantations performed in The Netherlands between 1990 and 2018. Incidence of EGL, defined as graft loss within 90 days, in primary transplantation was 8.2% (699/8,511). The main causes were graft rejection (30%), primary nonfunction (25%), and thrombosis or infarction (20%). EGL profoundly impacted short- and long-term patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval: 8.2; 5.1-13.2 and 1.7; 1.3-2.1, respectively). Of the EGL recipients who survived 90 days after transplantation (617/699) only 440 of the 617 were relisted for re-transplantation. Of those relisted, only 298 were ultimately re-transplanted leading to an actual re-transplantation rate of 43%. Noticeably, re-transplantation was associated with a doubled incidence of EGL, but similar long-term graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.1; 0.6-1.8). Thus, EGL after kidney transplantation is a medical catastrophe with high mortality rates, low relisting rates, and increased risk of recurrent EGL following re-transplantation. This implies that detrimental outcomes also involve convergence of risk factors in recipients with EGL. The 8.2% incidence of EGL minimally impacted population mortality, indicating this incidence is acceptable.

Impact of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation on Patient Survival.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Compared with recipients of blood group ABO-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs), recipients of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) LDKTs have higher risk for graft loss, particularly in the first few weeks after transplantation. However, the decision to proceed with ABOi LDKT should be based on a comparison of the alternative: waiting for future ABOc LDKTs (eg, through kidney paired exchange) or for a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT). We sought to evaluate the patient survival difference between ABOi LDKTs and waiting for an ABOc LDKT or an ABOc DDKT. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 808 ABOi LDKT recipients and 2,423 matched controls from among 245,158 adult first-time kidney-only waitlist registrants who did not receive an ABOi LDKT and who remained on the waitlist or received either an ABOc LDKT or an ABOc DDKT, 2002 to 2017. EXPOSURE: Receipt of ABOi LDKT. OUTCOME: Death. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We compared mortality among ABOi LDKT recipients versus a weighted matched comparison population using Cox proportional hazards regression and Cox models that accommodated for changing hazard ratios over time. RESULTS: Compared with matched controls, ABOi LDKT was associated with greater mortality risk in the first 30 days posttransplantation (cumulative survival of 99.0% vs 99.6%) but lower mortality risk beyond 180 days posttransplantation. Patients who received an ABOi LDKT had higher cumulative survival at 5 and 10 years (90.0% and 75.4%, respectively) than similar patients who remained on the waitlist or received an ABOc LDKT or ABOc DDKT (81.9% and 68.4%, respectively). LIMITATIONS: No measurement of ABO antibody titers in recipients; eligibility of participants for kidney paired donation is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant candidates who receive an ABOi LDKT and survive more than 180 days posttransplantation experience a long-term survival benefit compared to remaining on the waitlist to potentially receive an ABOc kidney transplant.

Association Between Weight Loss Before Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and Posttransplantation Outcomes.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is debate on whether weight loss, a hallmark of frailty, signals higher risk for adverse outcomes among recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Using national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, we included all DDKT recipients in the United States between December 4, 2004, and December 3, 2014, who were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) when listed for DDKT. EXPOSURES: Relative pre-DDKT weight change as a continuous predictor and categorized as <5% weight change from listing to DDKT, ≥5% to <10% weight loss, ≥10% weight loss, ≥5% to <10% weight gain, and ≥10% weight gain. OUTCOMES: We examined 3 post-DDKT outcomes: (1) transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS) in days, (2) all-cause graft failure, and (3) mortality. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Unadjusted fractional polynomial methods, multivariable log-gamma models, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 94,465 recipients of DDKT, median pre-DDKT weight change was 0 (interquartile range, -3.5 to +3.9) kg. There were nonlinear unadjusted associations between relative pre-DDKT weight loss and longer transplant hospitalization LOS, higher all-cause graft loss, and higher mortality. Compared with recipients with <5% pre-DDKT weight change (n = 49,366; 52%), recipients who lost ≥10% of their listing weight (n = 10,614; 11%) had 0.66 (95% CI, 0.23-1.09) days longer average transplant hospitalization LOS (P = 0.003), 1.11-fold higher graft loss (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17; P < 0.001), and 1.18-fold higher mortality (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < 0.001) independent of recipient, donor, and transplant factors. Pre-DDKT dialysis exposure, listing body mass index category, and waiting time modified the association of pre-DDKT weight change with hospital LOS (interaction P < 0.10), but not with all-cause graft loss and mortality. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounders and inability to identify volitional weight change. Also, the higher significance level set to increase the power of detecting interactions with the fixed sample size may have resulted in increased risk for type 1 error. CONCLUSIONS: DDKT recipients with ≥10% pre-DDKT weight loss are at increased risk for adverse outcomes and may benefit from augmented support post-DDKT.

Systematic Surgical Assessment of Deceased-Donor Kidneys as a Predictor of Short-Term Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Short-term kidney graft dysfunction is correlated with complications and it is associated with a decreased long-term survival; therefore, a scoring system to predict short-term renal transplant outcomes is warranted. AIM: The aim of this study is to quantify the impression of the organ procurement surgeon in correlation with the following kidney transplant outcomes: immediate graft function (IGF), delayed graft function (DGF), and primary nonfunction (PNF). Results are compared to factors associated with the 1-year outcome. METHODS: A regional prospective pilot study was performed using deceased-donor organ assessment forms to be filled out by procurement surgeons after procurement. Data were gathered on kidney temperature, perfusion, anatomy, atherosclerosis, and overall quality. RESULTS: Included were 90 donors who donated 178 kidneys, 166 of which were transplanted. Variables that were significantly more prevalent in the DGF-or-PNF group (n = 65) are: large kidney size (length, p = 0.008; width, p = 0.036), poor perfusion quality (p = 0.037), lower diuresis (p = 0.039), fewer hypotensive episodes (p = 0.003), and donation-after-circulatory-death donors (p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis showed that perfusion quality and kidney width significantly predicted the short-term outcome. However multivariable analysis of long-term outcomes showed that the first measured donor creatinine, kidney donor risk index, IGF vs. DGF+PNG, and kidney length predicted outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that short-term graft function and 1-year graft function indeed are influenced by different variables. DGF and PNF occur more frequently in kidneys with poor perfusion and in larger kidneys. A plausible explanation for this is that these kidneys might be insufficiently washed out, or even congested, which may predispose to DGF. These kidneys would probably benefit most from reconditioning strategies, such as machine perfusion. A scoring system including these variables might aid in decision-making towards allocation and potential reconditioning strategies.

Evaluating living donor kidney transplant rates: Are you reaching your potential?

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) rate has been calculated as a percentage of total kidney transplant volume. We believe this calculation to be inherently flawed because the number of deceased donor kidney transplants has no bearing on the number of LDKT performed. We propose an alternative calculation of LDKT rate as a percentage of the number of new waitlist registrants. METHODS: We evaluated 192 adult transplant centers in the United States with respect to their LDKT rate according to both the traditional and proposed calculations, using data from the scientific registry of transplant recipients between July 2014 and June 2015. RESULTS: The median LDKT rate for every 100 new waitlist registrants was 12.3, compared to 27.9 for every 100 total kidney transplants. Based on our proposed calculation of LDKT rate, 16.7% of transplant centers were misevaluated when compared to the national mean using the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: A new calculation of LDKT rate based on new waitlist registrants, and not total kidney transplants, is necessary to eliminate the bias associated with the traditional method, allowing for the identification of centers for improvement as well as each individual center's true potential based on their patient demographics.

Negative impact of prolonged cold storage time before machine perfusion preservation in donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation.

Kidney grafts are often preserved initially in static cold storage (CS) and subsequently on hypothermic machine perfusion (MP). However, the impact of CS/MP time on transplant outcome remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of prolonged CS/MP time in a single-center retrospective cohort of 59 donation after circulatory death (DCD) and 177 matched donation after brain death (DBD) kidney-alone transplant recipients. With mean overall CS/MP times of 6.0 h/30.0 h, overall incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was higher in DCD transplants (30.5%) than DBD transplants (7.3%, P < 0.0001). In logistic regression, DCD recipient (P < 0.0001), longer CS time (P = 0.0002), male recipient (P = 0.02), and longer MP time (P = 0.08) were associated with higher DGF incidence. In evaluating the joint effects of donor type (DBD vs. DCD), CS time (<6 vs. ≥6 h), and MP time (<36 vs. ≥36 h) on DGF incidence, one clearly sees an unfavorable effect of MP time ≥36 h (P = 0.003) across each donor type and CS time stratum, whereas the unfavorable effect of CS time ≥6 h (P = 0.01) is primarily seen among DCD recipients. Prolonged cold ischemia time had no unfavorable effect on renal function or graft survival at 12mo post-transplant. Long CS/MP time detrimentally affects early DCD/DBD kidney transplant outcome when grafts were mainly preserved by MP; prolonged CS time before MP has a particularly negative impact in DCD kidney transplantation.

A novel allocation scheme for deceased donor kidneys to balance equity and utility.

Background: Patients with sensitization and blood type O experience increased waiting times for deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). While allocation benefits are needed to resolve inequity in DDKT opportunity, whether DDKT has comparable outcomes in this disadvantaged population requires further study. This study assessed these outcomes and developed a new allocation system that balances equity and utility. Methods: Patients from national and hospital cohorts from two centers in Korea were categorized as B1 to B4 (according to panel reactive antibody [PRA] positivity and ABO blood type) and A1 to A4 (based on the maximal PRA% and blood type), respectively. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of PRA and blood type on graft failure and mortality, respectively. Based on DDKT opportunities and posttransplant outcomes, a new scoring system for kidney allocation was developed. Results: The national and hospital cohorts included 3,311 and 819 patients, respectively, who underwent DDKT. Despite the disparities in DDKT opportunities, the graft failure rates and mortality did not differ among the different PRA and blood type groups. Furthermore, posttransplantation outcomes did not differ according to the categories with different DDKT opportunities. A new scoring system to provide additional points to disadvantaged populations was developed based on the hazard ratios for DDKT. Conclusion: A new allocation approach based on PRA and ABO blood types offers benefits to disadvantaged patients with fewer DDKT opportunities and could enhance equity without sacrificing utility in Korea, which has a long waiting time for DDKT.

Impact of preoperative ultrasonography for predicting the prognosis of deceased donor kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of donor kidney ultrasonography (US) for predicting functional kidney volume and identifying ideal kidney grafts in deceased donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: In total, 272 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation from 2000 to 2020 at Samsung Medical Center were enrolled. Donor kidney information (i.e., right or left) was provided to the radiologist who performed US image re-analysis. To binarize each kidney's ultrasound parameters, an optimal cutoff value for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 within 1 year after kidney transplantation was selected using the receiver operating characteristic curve with a specificity >60%. Cox regression analysis was performed for an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 within 1 year after kidney transplantation and graft failure within 2 years after kidney transplantation. RESULTS: The product of renal length and cortical thickness was a statistically significant predictor of graft function. The odds ratios of an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 within a year after kidney transplantation and the hazard ratio of graft failure within 2 years after kidney transplantation were 5.91 (P=0.003) and 5.76 (P=0.022), respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative US of the donor kidney can be used to evaluate donor kidney function and can predict short-term graft survival. An imaging modality such as US should be included in the donor selection criteria as an additional recommendation. However, the purpose of this study was not to narrow the expanded criteria but to avoid catastrophic consequences by identifying ideal donor kidneys using preoperative US.

The Impact of Ethnicity on Research Authorization at the Time of Organ Donation: A Single-Center Experience Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Objective: Research on deceased organ donors is needed to expand the donor organ supply. Little is known about the rate of research authorization among various groups. We aimed to determine the percentage of research authorization by the deceased donor family across different donor characteristics. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of deceased donors referred to one U.S. institution for kidney transplantation over a 12-month period. Organs were offered from multiple organ procurement organizations (OPO) across the United States. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of research authorization. Results: From 10/2018 to 10/2019, 437 deceased donors were accepted for transplantation. 81.5% came from OPOs outside our donor service area and 18.5% from our local OPO. Overall, research authorization was declined in 24.0% of donors. Declined authorization was highest among Black donors (42.0%) compared to Whites (16.3%) and Hispanics (26.9%); p=0.000006. Donors <35 years had highest declined research authorization at 42.9% compared to older donors. There were no significant differences between individual OPOs. Conclusion: Deceased donor research authorization declined at the time of organ donation is higher among Black and younger donors. There is an immediate need for the transplant and donor community to develop best-practices to eliminate barriers to research in organ transplantation.

Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes at a Sri Lankan Center: A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis.

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients and incurs a huge burden on healthcare expenses globally. Renal replacement therapy becomes imperative when patients reach end-stage renal disease. Kidney transplant is the best modality of choice for the majority of patients, and deceased donor kidney transplantation is the major contributor in the majority of countries. We present an outcome study in Sri Lanka for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Methodology This is an observational study conducted at the Nephrology Unit 1 at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, in patients who had undergone deceased donor kidney transplantation from July 2018 to mid-2020. We studied the outcomes of these patients for one year, including delayed graft function, acute rejection, infection, and mortality. Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, and the University of Colombo. Results The study included 27 participants with a mean age of 55 ± 9.519 years. Diabetes mellitus (69.2%), hypertension (11.5%), chronic glomerulonephritis (7.7%), chronic pyelonephritis (7.7%), and obstructive uropathy (3.8%) were the etiological factors of CKD. Basiliximab was used as an induction agent, and a tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen was used for maintenance in all patients. The mean cold ischemic time was 9 ± 3.861 hours. The majority (44%) of recipients had an O-positive blood group. At one year, the mean serum creatinine was 1.40 ± 0.686 mg/dL, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 62 ± 21.281 mL/minute/1.73 m2. Delayed graft function occurred in 25.9% of the recipients, and 22.2% had acute transplant rejection. Postoperative infection was observed in 44.4% of recipients. One year after transplantation, 22% of the recipients died. Infection was the cause of death in 83% of recipients (five of six patients). The causes of death in the study sample were pneumonia (50%), including pneumocystis pneumonia (17%), myocardial infarction (17%), mucormycosis (16%), and other infections (17%). There was no significant association between outcomes at one year with age, gender, causes of CKD, or postoperative complications. Conclusions Our study found that the one-year survival rate following deceased donor kidney transplantation in Sri Lanka is relatively low, with infections being the leading cause of mortality. The high infection rate during the early post-transplant period underscores the need for enhanced infection prevention and control measures. Although we did not observe any significant association between the outcomes and the variables studied, it is important to note that the small sample size of our study may have influenced this finding. Future research with larger sample sizes may provide more insights into the factors influencing post-transplant outcomes in Sri Lanka.

Greater Impact of Living Donation Than HLA Mismatching in Short-Term Renal Allograft Survival.

INTRODUCTION: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is accepted as first-line treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease with advantages over deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Still, how the known detrimental effect of HLA mismatch (MM) may hamper these advantages remains unsettled. We sought to determine the effect of the degree of HLA MM, separately in deceased and living donor renal allograft outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated all adults submitted to LDKT and DDKT at our center between 2006 and 2018. Their HLA MM was classified according to the British Society of Transplantation system in low mismatch (LM) (level 1-2) and high mismatch (HM) (level 3-4). Acute rejection (AR) and global or censored graft survival were the outcomes of interest. Recipients were followed up from transplant until death, graft failure or the end of 2020.  Results: One thousand sixty-eight kidney transplant recipients were analyzed, 815 (76%) received a DDKT whereas 253 (24%) received an LDKT. From those submitted to DDKT, 95 (12%) had an LM and 720 (88%) had an HM, whereas in LDKT 32 (13%) had an LM and 221 (87%) had an HM. The AR at one year was 9% in the full cohort. Significant risk factors for AR were HM DDKT (OR:2.3, P=0.047) or HM LDKT (OR:5.6, P=0.003) (LM DDKT as reference), calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥5% (OR:1.9, P=0.040) and delayed graft function (DGF), (OR:3.2, P<0.001). Censored graft survival (CGS) at five years was 96% in the full cohort. Independent predictors for censored graft failure (CGF) were HM LDKT (HR:0.2, P=0.046) (LM DDKT as reference), AR (HR:2.7, P=0.008) and DGF (HR:2.2, P=0.017). Global graft survival (GGS) at five years was 91% in the full cohort. Independent predictors for global graft failure (GGF) were HM LDKT (HR:0.2, P=0.042) (LM DDKT as reference), recipient age (HR:1.8, P<0.001) and DGF (HR:1.8, P=0.006). No AR, CGF or GGF episodes were observed in the LM LDKT group. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the level of HLA MM increased the risk of AR independently of donor type. Considering short graft survival, our results support the advantage of living donor vs deceased donor even with an increased HLA MM. However, its effect on long-term graft survival remains to be settled, emphasizing the need for further studies on this matter.

Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Controversies.

Renal dysfunction, a prevalent comorbidity in advanced heart failure, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. In the recent era, the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation has experienced great success in the treatment of both renal and cardiac dysfunction in end-stage disease states, and the number of transplants has increased dramatically. In this review, we discuss appropriate indications and selection criteria, overall and organ-specific outcomes, and future perspectives in the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation.