Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: A real-world study (HOT2101).

Durvalumab has been administered to patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether durvalumab benefits these patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with EGFR mutation who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between June 2018 and March 2021. We assessed patient characteristics, efficacy of durvalumab, and durvalumab safety before and after targeted therapy. We collected data on a total of 673 patients, of whom 401 (59.6%) underwent EGFR mutation testing. Fifty-one patients were EGFR positive and 311 were EGFR negative. In the EGFR-positive group, there were higher proportions of females, never-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Of the 51 patients in the positive group and 311 in the negative group who received CRT, 45 (88.2%) and 247 (79.4%) received durvalumab, with median progression-free survival of 23.0 and 24.2 months in the positive and negative groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.67). The main adverse event was pneumonitis (positive group: 62.2%; 4.4% grade 3; negative group: 62.3%; 6.9% grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Of the 45 patients in the positive group who received durvalumab, 14 (31.1%) received targeted therapy after durvalumab at the data cutoff. One patient discontinued targeted therapy after developing pneumonitis. In patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC with EGFR mutation, durvalumab after CRT is potentially safe and effective. This may be a suitable treatment sequence for these patients.

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ056).

Locoregional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection lacks standard treatment. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone is often selected in daily clinical practice for patients with locoregional recurrence; however, the therapeutic efficacy of these treatments remains unclear, and we aimed to assess this. This retrospective observational study used data from patients with NSCLC diagnosed with locoregional recurrence after complete resection who subsequently underwent concurrent CRT followed by durvalumab (CRT-D group) or CRT alone (CRT group). We employed propensity score analysis with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for various confounders and evaluate efficacy in the CRT-D group. After IPTW adjustment, the CRT-D group contained 119 patients (64.7% male; 69.7% adenocarcinoma), and the CRT group contained 111 patients (60.5% male; 73.4% adenocarcinoma). Their mean ages were 66 and 65 years, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted median progression-free survival was 25.4 and 11.5 months for the CRT-D and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.64); the median overall survival was not reached in either group favoring CRT-D (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.99). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 48.8% of patients during CRT, 10.7% after initiating durvalumab maintenance therapy in the CRT-D group, and 57.3% in the CRT group. Overall, the sequential approach of CRT followed by durvalumab is a promising treatment strategy for locoregional recurrence of NSCLC after complete resection.

Multicentre phase II trial of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prospective data on treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. We conducted a phase II multicentre study on cabozantinib after ICI treatment in HCC. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, clinical trial involving academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria included diagnosis of HCC, refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment, and Child-Pugh A liver function. A maximum of two prior lines of therapy were allowed. All patients were commenced on cabozantinib at 60 mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022; 27 and 20 patients had received one and two prior therapies, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.3-5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% CI 7.3-14.4), and the 1-year OS rate was 45.3%. Partial response and stable disease occurred in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) patients, respectively. When used as a second-line treatment (n = 27), cabozantinib was associated with a median PFS and OS of 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-6.7) and 14.3 (95% CI 8.9-NR) months, respectively. The corresponding median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-11.0) and 14.3 (95% CI 9.0-NR) months, respectively, for those receiving ICI-based regimens with proven benefits (n = 17). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (6.4%). The median dose of cabozantinib was 40 mg/day. The number of prior therapies was an independent prognosticator (one vs. two; hazard ratio = 0.37; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib demonstrated efficacy in patients who had received prior ICI regimens; survival data for second-line cabozantinib following first-line ICI regimens provide a reference for future clinical trial design. The number of prior lines of treatment may be considered a stratification factor in randomised studies. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Prospective data on systemic treatment following prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. This phase II clinical trial provides efficacy and safety data on cabozantinib in patients who had received prior ICI-based treatment. Exploratory analyses showed that the performance of cabozantinib differed significantly when used as a second- or third-line treatment. The above data could be used as a reference for clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials on subsequent treatment lines following ICIs. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04588051.

Exceptional sustained long-term complete response to Tepotinib in a MET-amplified advanced intrahepatic biliary tract cancer failing Durvalumab plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a diverse group of malignancies with varied genetic backgrounds. The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is increasing, particularly in Western countries. Despite advancements in treatments, the prognosis for BTC remains poor. Recent molecular profiling has revealed that up to 40% of iCC cases have targetable genetic alterations. MET amplification, although rare, presents a significant target for therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old female with a history of ulcerative colitis presented with shoulder pain and a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan revealed an enlarged liver and multiple metastases. Histopathological analysis diagnosed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. First-line therapy with Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Durvalumab resulted in disease progression. Molecular profiling identified a TP53 mutation and MET amplification. Based on these findings, Tepotinib was initiated. Tepotinib treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size and normalization of CA 19-9 levels within 2 months, achieving a complete metabolic remission lasting up to 17 months. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal side effects. DISCUSSION: MET-amplified BTCs are exceedingly rare, and evidence for targeted treatment is limited. This case demonstrates the efficacy of Tepotinib in a young patient with MET-amplified iCC, showing a long-term response and suggesting a potential new standard treatment option for this molecularly defined entity. This case also highlights the aggressive nature of MET-amplified tumors and the need for targeted second-line therapies. CONCLUSION: Tepotinib showed remarkable efficacy in treating MET-amplified intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, underscoring the importance of molecular profiling in BTCs and suggesting a potential new therapeutic approach for this rare cancer subtype.

Four-year overall survival update from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus sorafenib; durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for OS. Results reported herein are from a 4-year updated OS analysis of HIMALAYA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with uHCC and no previous systemic treatment were randomized to STRIDE (n = 393), durvalumab (n = 389), or sorafenib (n = 389). The updated data cut-off was 23 January 2023. OS and serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Additionally, baseline characteristics and subsequent therapies were analyzed in long-term survivors (≥36 months beyond randomization). RESULTS: For STRIDE, durvalumab, and sorafenib, median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 49.12 months (46.95-50.17 months), 48.46 months (46.82-49.81 months), and 47.31 months (45.08-49.15 months), respectively. OS hazard ratio (95% CI) for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (0.67-0.92). The 36-month OS rate for STRIDE was 30.7% versus 19.8% for sorafenib. The 48-month OS rate remained higher for STRIDE at 25.2%, versus 15.1% for sorafenib. The long-term OS benefit of STRIDE was observed across clinically relevant subgroups and was further improved in participants who achieved disease control. Long-term survivors with STRIDE (n = 103) included participants across clinically relevant subgroups, and 57.3% (59/103) had no reported subsequent anticancer therapy. No new serious treatment-related AEs occurred with STRIDE from the primary analysis (17.5%; 68/388). Durvalumab maintained OS noninferiority to sorafenib and no late-onset safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the longest follow-up to date in phase III studies in uHCC. The unprecedented 3- and 4-year OS rates reinforce the sustained long-term OS benefit of STRIDE versus sorafenib. STRIDE maintained a tolerable yet differentiated safety profile from other current uHCC therapies. Results continue to support the long-term benefits of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.

A phase 2 study of AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or oleclumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the adenosine 2A receptor (A2AR) diminishes the immunosuppressive effects of adenosine and may complement immune-targeting drugs. This phase 2 study evaluated the A2AR antagonist AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or oleclumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed disease progressing within 6 months on ≥ 2 therapy lines were randomly assigned to either Module 1 (AZD4635 + durvalumab) or Module 2 (AZD4635 + oleclumab). Primary endpoints were objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were treated (Module 1, n = 29; Module 2, n = 30). Median number of prior therapies was 4. One confirmed complete response by RECIST (Module 1) and 2 confirmed PSA responses (1 per module) were observed. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) possibly related to AZD4635 were nausea (37.9%), fatigue (20.7%), and decreased appetite (17.2%) in Module 1; nausea (50%), fatigue (30%), and vomiting (23.3%) in Module 2. No dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related serious AEs were observed. In Module 1, AZD4635 geometric mean trough concentration was 124.9 ng/mL (geometric CV% 69.84; n = 22); exposures were similar in Module 2. In Modules 1 and 2, median (95% CI) rPFS was 2.3 (1.6 -3.8) and 1.5 (1.3- 4.0) months, respectively. Median PFS was 1.7 versus 2.3 months for patients with high versus low blood-based adenosine signature. CONCLUSION: In this heavily pretreated population, AZD4635 with durvalumab or oleclumab demonstrated minimal antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL: gov identifier: NCT04089553.

Efficacy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary duct cancer and biomarkers exploration.

BACKGROUND: The anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab has been approved for use in first-line advanced biliary duct cancer (ABC). So far, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are lacking. METHODS: ABC patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without durvalumab were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline clinical pathological indices were retrieved from medical records. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed. The levels of peripheral biomarkers from 48 patients were detected with assay kits including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genomic alterations in 27 patients whose tumor tissues were available were depicted via targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 186 ABC patients met the inclusion criteria between January 2020 and December 2022 were finally enrolled in this study. Of these, 93 patients received chemotherapy with durvalumab and the rest received chemotherapy alone. Durvalumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (6.77 vs. 4.99 months; hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88]; P = 0.005), but not OS (14.29 vs. 13.24 months; hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.62-1.32]; P = 0.608) vs. chemotherapy alone in previously untreated ABC patients. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving chemotherapy with and without durvalumab was 19.1% and 7.8%, respectively. Pretreatment sPD-L1, CSF1R and OPG were identified as significant prognosis predictors in patients receiving durvalumab. ADGRB3 and RNF43 mutations were enriched in patients who responded to chemotherapy plus durvalumab and correlated with superior survival. CONCLUSION: This retrospective real-world study confirmed the clinical benefit of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve ABC patients. Peripheral sPD-L1 and CSF1R are promising prognostic biomarkers for this therapeutic strategy. Presence of ADGRB3 or RNF43 mutations could improve the stratification of immunotherapy outcomes, but further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Exploring the impact of durvalumab on biliary tract cancer: insights from real-world clinical data.

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the effectiveness of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine for biliary tract cancers (BTC). It aims to confirm the TOPAZ-1 trial results in a real-world context and explore the link between BTC molecular profiles and patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 BTC patients treated with durvalumab, platinum, and gemcitabine at five cancer centers in Austria and one in Germany from 2022 to 2024. Molecular profiling used targeted DNA and RNA assays. Clinical endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correlations to second-line molecular-targeted therapies. RESULTS: Among 102 patients, 60.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The treatment achieved a disease control rate of 71.57% and an overall response rate of 35.11%. Median PFS was 6.51 months, and OS was 13.61 months. Patients under 65 had significantly better OS. Alterations in chromatin remodeling or homologous recombination repair genes were not predictive of survival benefit (HR: 0.45; p = 0.851 and HR: 1.63; p = 0.26, respectively). Patients with molecular-informed second-line therapy showed a trend toward survival benefit (HR: 0.23; p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the phase 3 trial results of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine, providing a substantial real-world dataset with detailed molecular characterization. No specific patient subgroup showed a markedly better response to durvalumab based on conventional NGS panels. Further research is needed to explore the link between immunotherapy responses and molecular subgroups.

Plant-derived Durvalumab variants show efficient PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and therapeutically favourable FcR binding.

Immune checkpoint blocking therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory signalling pathway has produced encouraging results in the treatment of a variety of cancers. Durvalumab (Imfinzi®) targeting PD-L1 is currently used for immunotherapy of several tumour malignancies. The Fc region of this IgG1 antibody has been engineered to reduce FcγR interactions with the aim of enhancing blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions without the depletion of PD-L1-expressing immune cells. Here, we used Nicotiana benthamiana to produce four variants of Durvalumab (DL): wild-type IgG1 and its 'Fc-effector-silent' variant (LALAPG) carrying further modifications to increase antibody half-life (YTE); IgG4S228P and its variant (PVA) with Fc mutations to decrease binding to FcγRI. In addition, DL variants were produced with two distinct glycosylation profiles: afucosylated and decorated with α1,6-core fucose. Plant-derived DL variants were compared to the therapeutic antibody regarding their ability to (i) bind to PD-L1, (ii) block PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory signalling and (iii) engage with the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and various Fcγ receptors. It was found that plant-derived DL variants bind to recombinant PD-L1 and to PD-L1 expressed in gastrointestinal cancer cells and are able to effectively block its interaction with PD-1 on T cells, thereby enhancing their activation. Furthermore, we show a positive impact of Fc amino acid mutations and core fucosylation on DL's therapeutic potential. Compared to Imfinzi®, DL-IgG1 (LALAPG) and DL-IgG4 (PVA)S228P show lower affinity to CD32B inhibitory receptor which can be therapeutically favourable. Importantly, DL-IgG1 (LALAPG) also shows enhanced binding to FcRn, a key determinant of serum half-life of IgGs.

Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.

Variations in Patterns of Prescribing Durvalumab in Stage III Lung Cancer: A Survey of Australian Medical Oncologists.

INTRODUCTION: Local Australian guidelines for the optimal management of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend consolidation durvalumab for all patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, irrespective of their PD-L1 expression or driver mutation status. The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) differs, with consolidation durvalumab only recommended in those patients whose tumours express PD-L1. METHODS: Due to differing global guidelines, we conducted an Australia and New Zealand wide survey of medical oncologists specialising in thoracic cancer to determine the variations in patterns of prescribing durvalumab in stage III unresectable NSCLC. This survey was done electronically and sponsored by the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australia (TOGA). RESULTS: Thirty-two medical oncologists completed the survey. In patients with EGFR-mutated stage III unresectable NSCLC, 6% of respondents stated that they prescribed durvalumab for all patients, while an additional 6% strongly recommended treatment. Forty-four percent suggested little benefit of consolidation durvalumab in this cohort, with an additional 19% advocating for observation only. In patients with PD-L1 negative (0%) stage III unresectable NSCLC, 13% of respondents prescribed durvalumab for all patients, while an additional 56% strongly recommended treatment. Interestingly, 18%, 10%, and 10% of prescribers discussed self-funded oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with EGFR, ALK, or ROS-1-mutated NSCLC respectively as a substitute for consolidation durvalumab. CONCLUSION: Overall, the clinical practice of Australian and New Zealand Medical Oncologists is variable, but remains consistent with either the ASCO or ESMO guidelines. Local practice guidelines are required to ensure consistency in prescribing patterns across Australia, as well as providing evidence for self-funded treatments outside standard of care.

NSGO-OV-UMB1/ENGOT-OV30: A phase II study of durvalumab in combination with the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody Oleclumab in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the clinical efficacy of monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against PD-1/PD-L1 is modest. To enhance response rates to these immunotherapeutic agents and broaden the indications for their use, new approaches involving combinational therapy are needed. The immune regulator CD73 is a potential target, as it promotes tumor escape by producing immunosuppressive extracellular adenosine in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we present the results from the NSGO-OV-UMB1/ENGOT-OV-30 trial evaluating the activity of combining the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab with the anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab in patients with recurrent EOC. METHODS: In this phase II open-label non-randomized study, patients with CD73-positive relapsed EOC were intravenously administered oleclumab (3000 mg, Q2W) and durvalumab (1500 mg, Q4W). The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 16 weeks. The expression of PD-L1 and CD8 was assessed by immunohistochemistry of archival tumors. RESULTS: This trial included 25 patients with a median age of 66 years (47-77 years). Twenty-two patients were evaluable for treatment activity analysis. The DCR was 27%, the median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.2-4.2) and the median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.0-13.4). Infiltration of CD8+ cells and PD-L1 expression on tumor cells were observed in partially overlapping sets of 74% of the tumor samples. Neither CD8- nor PD-L1-positivity were significantly associated with better DCR. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with oleclumab and durvalumab was safe and demonstrated limited anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent EOC.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab plus chemotherapy in HRR non-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (KGOG 3045): A phase II umbrella trial.

AIM: We investigated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) in addition to single-agent chemotherapy (CT) in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) lacking homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KGOG 3045 was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II umbrella trial. Patients with PROC without HRR gene mutations who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy were enrolled. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥25%) were assigned to arm A (D + CT), whereas those with low PD-L1 expression were assigned to arm B (D + T75 + CT). After completing arm B recruitment, patients were sequentially assigned to arms C (D + T300 + CT) and D (D + CT). RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients were enrolled (5, 18, 17, and 18 patients in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively). The objective response rates were 20.0, 33.3, 29.4, and 22.2%, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 20.0, 66.7, 47.1, and 66.7 of patients, respectively, but were effectively managed. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that adding T to D + CT improved progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.435; 95% CI, 0.229-0.824; P = 0.011). Favorable response to chemoimmunotherapy was associated with MUC16 mutation (P = 0.0214), high EPCAM expression (P = 0.020), high matrix remodeling gene signature score (P = 0.017), and low FOXP3 expression (P = 0.047). Patients showing favorable responses to D + T + CT exhibited significantly higher EPCAM expression levels (P = 0.008) and matrix remodeling gene signature scores (P = 0.031) than those receiving D + CT. CONCLUSIONS: Dual immunotherapy with chemotherapy showed acceptable response rates and tolerable safety in HRR non-mutated PROC, warranting continued clinical investigation.

The SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab InjEction-1 (SUBDUE-1) trial: first-in-human trial in patients with bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab and examine the impact on tissue and circulating immune cell populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were chemotherapy and immunotherapy naïve (bacille Calmette-Guérin allowed) with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer or non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer planned for radical cystectomy (RC). The study was a Phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab at three pre-determined doses (25, 75, 150 mg) diluted in 25 mL normal saline, injected at 25 locations (25 × 1 mL injections), at least 2 weeks before RC. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were recruited (10 male, one female). No significant changes were reported on American Urological Association Symptom Score or O'Leary Interstitial Cystitis Scale. In all, 14 adverse events (AEs) were reported (10 Grade 1, three Grade 2, one Grade 3), none considered immune-related. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded. All the patients underwent RC. Tissue immune populations changed following durvalumab injection (P = 0.012), with a statistically significant increase in M2-macrophage (CD163) when comparing the 25-150 mg dose (P = 0.021). Basal/mixed cancers showed a larger CD163 increase than luminal cancers (P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab is feasible and safe without immune-related AEs and shows local immunological effects.

Significance of changes in tumor markers in patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy as a surrogate marker for tumor response to unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: When evaluating response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the tumor sometimes initially swells before shrinking and ultimately responding, also called pseudo-progression. In this study, we analyzed whether tumor markers were useful for reflecting the treatment response. METHODS: Thirty-three patients who were treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy (Dur + Tre) were enrolled. Their functional reserve was Child-Pugh grade A. Their tumor markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), or AFP-Lectin 3 fraction (AFP-L3) were positive. Tumor markers were evaluated before treatment and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the start of treatment. The first radiological evaluation was carried out at 4 weeks and the second evaluation at 8-12 weeks. The responders included those with complete response and partial response and the nonresponders included those with stable disease (SD) and progression disease at best response evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: In the responder group, the change ratio of AFP, DCP, and AFP-L3 specifically decreased at 8 weeks. In the nonresponder group, the change ratio of DCP specifically increased at 4 weeks. The optimal cut-off value to divide responders and nonresponders at 4 weeks was approximately -40%. The ratio of responders was 72.7% in the patients whose AFP or DCP decreased over 40% at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The change in tumor markers is a more useful predicter of tumor response to Dur + Tre than imaging evaluation alone.

ADJUBIL: phase II study of adjuvant immunotherapy with STRIDE regimen with/without capecitabine in biliary tract cancers.

Biliary tract cancer is a highly heterogeneous group of gastrointestinal cancers, and the only curative treatment is surgery, which is only applicable at early stages of the malignancy. ADJUBIL, a phase II trial (NCT05239169), aims to evaluate immunotherapy with durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine in adjuvant situations for biliary tract cancers. A total of 40 prospective patients will be randomly assigned following surgery, consisting of a two-arm feasibility pilot part with a pick-the-winner design with durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with or without capecitabine.

This article describes the design of a phase II clinical trial called ADJUBIL, which evaluates the use of immunotherapy (durvalumab and tremelimumab) with or without classic chemotherapy (capecitabine) in biliary tract cancer patients who have undergone curative surgery. This type of treatment is also called adjuvant therapy, meaning it is used after the primary treatment. Biliary tract cancer is a rare type of liver cancer, often diagnosed late. Following surgery, patients may experience an early return of the disease, called tumor relapse. To avoid or delay tumor relapse, patients need extra treatment. Pure chemotherapy (capecitabine) is the standard after curative surgery. For patients with no option for cure, chemotherapy together with new powerful immunotherapy has become standard. This study will recruit 40 adult patients with tumor removal, who will be randomly divided into two groups. Half of them will be treated with immunotherapy only (durvalumab and tremelimumab). The other half will be treated with capecitabine together with immunotherapy. This study will continue for 12 months, but the treatment can be stopped if, for example, the tumor reoccurs or any possible side effect of the therapy is detected. The most effective treatment type will be selected. This type of selection is called pick-the winner.

Safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in biliary cancer patients with peritoneal metastases.

Biliary tract cancers are a rare diagnosis with a rising incidence. Up to 20% of patients have peritoneal metastases, resulting in symptoms of ascites, abdominal pain and potential bowel obstruction. A standard of care systemic treatment comprises gemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab (gem/cis/durva). However, the clinical benefit among patients with peritoneal metastases remains unknown. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivers chemotherapy directly to the peritoneal space, which could potentially improve efficacy with minimal systemic toxicity. We describe the design of a Phase I study investigating PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel plus systemic gem/cis/durva among biliary tract cancer patients with peritoneal metastases who have not received prior systemic treatment. The primary end point is safety of PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel in combination with systemic gem/cis/durva.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05285358 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

PACIFIC-9: Phase III trial of durvalumab + oleclumab or monalizumab in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Evidence from the Phase III PACIFIC trial established durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting PD-L1, following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) as a global standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There remains an unmet need to improve upon the outcomes achieved with the PACIFIC regimen. Combining durvalumab with other immunotherapies may improve outcomes further. Two such immunotherapies include oleclumab, an mAb targeting CD73, and monalizumab, an mAb targeting NKG2A. Both agents demonstrated antitumor activity in early-phase trials. PACIFIC-9 (NCT05221840) is an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial comparing durvalumab plus either oleclumab or monalizumab with durvalumab plus placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression following cCRT.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05221840 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Durvalumab is a treatment that helps the body's immune system to identify and attack cancer cells by binding to a protein called PD-L1. Studies show that durvalumab lowers the risk of cancer growing or spreading, and prolongs survival, when administered after chemotherapy and radiation therapy ('chemoradiotherapy') in patients with a type of lung cancer called stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for whom surgery is not an option.Two antibody treatments have been developed that may help a patient's immune system to identify and attack cancer cells. Oleclumab binds to a protein on cancer cells called CD73, which prevents the production of adenosine, a chemical that obstructs the immune system from attacking the cancer. Monalizumab binds to NKG2A, a protein on immune cells that inhibits their ability to destroy cancer cells. Early studies suggest that combining either of these treatments with durvalumab may be better than durvalumab alone for slowing the growth and spread of cancer in patients with NSCLC.PACIFIC-9 is a study that aims to recruit approximately 999 patients with stage III NSCLC for whom surgery is not an option and who have completed chemoradiotherapy without the cancer growing or spreading. Patients will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive up to a year of treatment with durvalumab plus oleclumab, durvalumab plus monalizumab or durvalumab plus placebo. The primary measure of efficacy is the length of time that patients remain alive without the cancer growing or spreading for each combination versus durvalumab plus placebo.

Durvalumab and taxane family combination therapy enhances the antitumoral effects for NSCLC: An in vitro study.

Immunotherapy has lately become the most preferred cancer treatment method, and for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) first-line treatment, there are many immunotherapy options. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of paclitaxel (PTX), docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (durvalumab; DVL), and their combination in NSCLC. A-549 cells were treated with DVL in combination with PTX and DTX (a quarter of the IC50 ) to investigate their anticancer effects on these cells. The MTT assay, wound healing tests, and double-staining with Annexin V/PI were used to assess the cell viability, apoptosis, and migration. The results showed that a combination of 0.35 mg/mL DVL with 6.5 µg/mL PTX and 1.75 µg/mL DTX produced a synergistic effect with CI values of 0.88, 0.37, and 0.81, respectively. Moreover, the PTX + DTX + DVL combination led to a significantly increased apoptotic rate up to 88.70 ± 3.39% in the A549 cell line compared to monotherapy (p < .001). In addition, we found that the combination therapy with these agents increased the expression level of Bax, Cas-3, p53, and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in all experimental groups. In conclusion, the results suggest that combining anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy with chemotherapy may provide a promising approach to enhance treatment outcomes and be a potentially efficacious strategy for treating NSCLC patients. Further research and clinical investigations are needed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and validate the therapeutic potential of these compounds in vivo.

Prognostic significance of initial tumor shrinkage in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Baseline tumor size (BTS) is one of the prognostic factors of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy. However, its prognostic value in patients with locally advanced NSCLC receiving durvalumab maintenance therapy remains unclear. METHODS: The present study retrospectively reviewed 136 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who underwent CRT and durvalumab at two institutions in Japan. The maximum diameter of the target lesion (max BTS) before CRT was measured, the best response to CRT before durvalumab was evaluated, and the impact of the response on durvalumab was explored. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from the day of starting durvalumab. RESULTS: Of the total cohort, 133 (97.8%) patients had at least one measurable lesion. The best response to CRT resulting in CR, PR, and SD was seen in 0 (0%), 69 (51.9%), and 64 (48.1%) patients, respectively. PFS was significantly longer in the patients with PR than in those with SD after CRT (median not reached vs. 20.0 months; HR: 0.51; P = 0.023). Moreover, the absence of a massive lesion (max BTS < 50 mm) was associated with a superior CRT response (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The best response to induction CRT was associated with better PFS in patients with stage III NSCLC receiving durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy. Although the absence of a massive lesion was associated with a better response to induction CRT in this cohort, this was not translated into PFS and OS benefit.