Telotristat ethyl, a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, enhances antitumor efficacy of standard chemotherapy in preclinical cholangiocarcinoma models.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), an aggressive biliary tract cancer, carries a grim prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 5%-15%. Standard chemotherapy regimens for CCA, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) or its recently approved combination with durvalumab demonstrate dismal clinical activity, yielding a median survival of 12-14 months. Increased serotonin accumulation and secretion have been implicated in the oncogenic activity of CCA. This study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of telotristat ethyl (TE), a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor blocking serotonin biosynthesis, in combination with standard chemotherapies in preclinical CCA models. Nab-paclitaxel (NPT) significantly enhanced animal survival (60%), surpassing the marginal effects of TE (11%) or GemCis (9%) in peritoneal dissemination xenografts. Combining TE with GemCis (26%) or NPT (68%) further increased survival rates. In intrahepatic (iCCA), distal (dCCA) and perihilar (pCCA) subcutaneous xenografts, TE exhibited substantial tumour growth inhibition (41%-53%) compared to NPT (56%-69%) or GemCis (37%-58%). The combination of TE with chemotherapy demonstrated enhanced tumour growth inhibition in all three cell-derived xenografts (67%-90%). PDX studies revealed TE's marked inhibition of tumour growth (40%-73%) compared to GemCis (80%-86%) or NPT (57%-76%). Again, combining TE with chemotherapy exhibited an additive effect. Tumour cell proliferation reduction aligned with tumour growth inhibition in all CDX and PDX tumours. Furthermore, TE treatment consistently decreased serotonin levels in all tumours under all therapeutic conditions. This investigation decisively demonstrated the antitumor efficacy of TE across a spectrum of CCA preclinical models, suggesting that combination therapies involving TE, particularly for patients exhibiting serotonin overexpression, hold the promise of improving clinical CCA therapy.

Head-to-head comparison of treatment sequences in advanced pancreatic cancer-Real-world data from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study.

There are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal treatment sequence for advanced pancreatic cancer, as head-to-head phase III randomised trials are missing. We assess real-world effectiveness of three common sequential treatment strategies by emulating a hypothetical randomised trial. This analysis included 1551 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 613) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB; n = 938) as palliative first-line treatment. We used marginal structural modelling to compare overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between three common first- to second-line treatment sequences, adjusting for time-varying potential confounding. The sequences were: FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and GEMNAB→nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) + 5-fluorouracil. Outcome was also calculated stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the Pancreatic Cancer Score. Median OS and TTD of HRQoL independent of risk were 10.7 [8.9, 11.9] and 6.4 [4.8, 7.7] months for FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, 8.4 [7.4, 9.7] and 5.8 [4.6, 7.1] months for GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and 8.9 [7.8, 10.4] and 4.6 [4.1, 6.1] months for GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil. Compared to FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, OS and TTD were worse for poor-risk patients with GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF (OS: HR 2.09 [1.47, 2.98]; TTD: HR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27]) and those with GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil (OS: HR 1.35, [0.76, 2.39]; TTD: HR 2.62 [1.56, 4.42]). Brackets denote 95%-confidence intervals. The estimated real-world effectiveness of the three treatment sequences evaluated were largely comparable. Poor-risk patients might benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Future randomised trials on sequential treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted.

Efficacy and biomarker analysis of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited second-line therapy. We conducted this phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in advanced BTC. Histologically confirmed advanced BTC patients with documented disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Subjects received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus sintilimab 200 mg on day 1, administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions. Simultaneously, next-generation sequencing, programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were applied to explore potential biomarkers. Twenty-six subjects were consecutively enrolled. The ORR was 26.9% (7/26), including two complete responses and five partial responses, which met the primary end point. The disease control rate was 61.5% (16/26). The median PFS was 169 days (about 5.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-278 days). The median OS was 442 days (about 14.7 months, 95% CI 298-586 days). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly anemia (27%), leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (19%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (8%). No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Biomarker analysis suggested that positive PD-L1 and high proportions of CD8+ T-cell infiltration were correlated with improved clinical outcome. Nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab is a potentially effective and tolerable second-line regimen for advanced BTC that deserves to be studied in large-scale trials. PD-L1 status and CD8+ T cell infiltration might be promising biomarkers for efficacy prediction.

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Taxanes are the basic components of breast cancer chemotherapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) shows improved antitumor effects because of more targeted delivery. However, the effects of nab-paclitaxel have not been systematically studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with taxanes. Considering the limited treatment options for MBC, this study retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of nab-paclitaxel in patients with taxane-pretreated MBC. METHODS: Patients who had previously received taxanes and subsequently received nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy for MBC at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between October 2014 and April 2022 were included for analysis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and side effects. RESULTS: A total of 236 female patients with MBC were included. The median PFS was 7.20 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.63-7.80 months), and the ORR, DCR, and CBR were 29.55% (95% CI, 23.50%-35.60%), 83.64% (95% CI, 78.70%-88.60%), and 56.36% (95% CI, 49.80%-63.00%), respectively. Following nab-paclitaxel treatment, the median PFS of patients who were sensitive to taxanes during previous treatments was significantly longer than that of patients who were resistant to taxanes (7.57 months vs. 4.43 months, p < .001). The most common adverse events were sensory neuropathy (89.83%), neutropenia (48.73%), leukopenia (46.61%), and anemia (35.59%). CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel demonstrated clinical activity in taxane-pretreated patients with MBC. This beneficial effect was observed both in patients who were sensitive and resistant to taxanes during previous treatments. These results suggest nab-paclitaxel as the preferred chemotherapy regimen in patients with MBC, regardless of their sensitivity to taxanes during previous treatments.

Phase I/II Trial of Carboplatin, Nab-paclitaxel, and Pembrolizumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN13-175.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens have significantly improved survival for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Improvements in overall survival (OS) in two separate pembrolizumab trials have demonstrated survival improvements over chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 status. The optimal chemotherapy backbone for combination with immunotherapy is unknown. We hypothesized nab-paclitaxel may be a well-suited platinum partner to use in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy for both adenocarcinoma and squamous histology and conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the efficacy of this regimen in advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Adult patients with previously untreated, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC (any histology) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, any PD-L1 expression, and no EGFR mutations or ALK translocations, received carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 day 1, nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, and pembrolizumab 200 mg day 1 q21 days for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pembrolizumab q3w. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Forty-six evaluable patients enrolled, 14 in phase I and 32 in phase II, from June 2015 to July 2018 with a median duration of follow-up of 35.4 months. Median time from enrollment to data lock was 42 months. In the ITT population, the ORR was 35%, median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.6-8.2), and median OS was 15.4 months (CI, 12.4-28.1). There were no statistical differences in PFS or OS by PD-L1 status. The 2- and 3-year landmark OS rates were 33% and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab are a safe and effective regimen for patients with both squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. Although this study did not meet the prespecified endpoints, the median and landmark OS results are consistent with durable benefit of this regimen as seen in phase III trials for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from the open-label RELIANT study.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity in tumor cells enhances chemotherapy efficacy. We evaluated the selective GR modulator relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who had received at least 2 prior therapy lines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, phase III study, patients received once-daily oral relacorilant (100 mg, titrated to 150 mg in 25 mg increments/cycle) and nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), target gene modulation, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 43 patients enrolled, 31 were evaluable for ORR (12 did not reach first postbaseline radiographic assessment). An interim analysis to assess whether ORR was ≥10% showed no confirmed responses and the study was discontinued. Two (6.5%) patients attained unconfirmed partial responses and 15 (48.4%) had stable disease. Fourteen of 31 (45.2%) patients had reductions in target lesion size, despite prior nab-paclitaxel exposure in 12 of the 14. Median PFS and OS were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.9), respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue and nausea. RNA analysis confirmed that relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel suppressed 8 cortisol target genes of interest. CONCLUSION: Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel showed modest antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mPDAC, with no new safety signals. Studies of this combination in other indications with a high unmet medical need are ongoing.

A phase 1 study of biweekly nab-paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1/LV for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers: TCOG T1216 study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin- and fluoropyrimidine-based triplet regimens have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. Herein, we evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of biweekly nab-paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1/leucovorin (SOLAR) in chemonaïve UGI cancers. METHODS: A 3 + 3 phase 1 study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in SOLAR (nab-paclitaxel [150 mg/m2 in D1], oxaliplatin [60, 75, or 85 mg/m2 in D1], and oral S-1/leucovorin [35 mg/m2 and 30 mg bid from D1 to D7]). The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Thirteen and 6 accruals were in the dose-escalation and MTD expansion cohorts, respectively. One of 6 patients at level III experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea), which revealed that the MTD of oxaliplatin was 85 mg/m2. After a mean of 15.9 cycles of treatment, the most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (57.9%) and diarrhea (21.1%). The ORR was 63.2%. The median PFS and OS were 12.5 and 24.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study revealed the MTD of oxaliplatin and demonstrated the preliminary efficacy of SOLAR in UGI cancers, which deserves further investigation. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03162510.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n = 32; AG, n = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. CONCLUSION: The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308).

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 followed by gemcitabine-oxaliplatin as first-line alternating sequential treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Alternating sequential administration of drugs may be a promising approach to overcome chemotherapy resistance in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This study was an open-label, single-arm, and prospective trial included patients with untreated advanced PDAC. They received 2 cycles of NS regimen (nab-paclitaxel:125 mg/m2, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, plus S-1:40-60 mg, orally twice per day for 1-14 days) followed by 2 cycles of GemOx regimen (gemcitabine, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, and oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2, intravenously injected on day 1). The primary efficacy endpoint was a progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFSR-6m). The secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Specific mRNA transcripts were used to explore survival associated genes. RESULTS: Forty-two patients received a minimum of one treatment cycle, and of these, 30 patients completed one alternating treatment consisting of 4 cycles. The PFSR-6m was 71% (95% CI = 58%-87%). The median PFS and OS were 6.53 months (95% CI = 6.03-8.43) and 11.4 months (95% CI = 9.8-14.4), respectively. Common grades 3-4 hematological AEs included neutropenia 30.9%, leukopenia 26.2%, anemia 2.4%, and thrombocytopenia in 11.9%. Patients with OS > 10 months showed high expression of HLA-DQA2 while melanoma-associated antigen genes (MAGE) were notably upregulated in patients with OS < 10 months. CONCLUSION: The alternating sequential administration of the NS and GemOx regimens may be a novel approach for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced PDAC requiring further study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ChiCTR1900024867).

A phase II study of FOLFOX combined with nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic or advanced unresectable gastric, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium trial.

BACKGROUND: Doublet platinum or taxane-based therapies are the current standard backbone of treatment for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Previously used anthracycline-based triplet regimens are no longer used routinely due to toxicity and lack of superior efficacy. We hypothesized that the addition of nab-paclitaxel to FOLFOX (FOLFOX-A) would induce higher efficacy and better tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced unresectable HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this phase II single-arm trial of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48 hours) + nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) every 14 days of a 28-day cycle. Evaluable disease according to RECIST v1.1 for solid tumors was required. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Simon's optimal 2-stage design was used to test 5% versus 20% response rate with 90% power and 10% one-sided type I error rate. RESULTS: The study enrolled 39 patients. Median age was 63 (range 20-80) years, 30 (77%) were male, 34 (94%) were White, and 21 (57%) had gastric tumors. The median number of cycles completed was 4.5 (range: 0-36), and 25 patients required dose reductions or discontinuation of at least one component due to toxicity. Of the 38 patients evaluable for response, 15 (42.9%) had complete/partial response (CR/PR) as the best response, and 13 (37.1%) had stable disease. progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data were available for 38 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 27 months (range: 18.2-51.9 months for censored patients). Median PFS was 6.6 months (95% CI: 5.6-12.9), with 31.0% (95% CI: 18.4%-52.4%) 12-month PFS rate. The median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.8-20.7), 12-month OS rate was 44.7% (95% CI: 31.4%-63.7%). Treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicities included peripheral sensory neuropathy and anemia (18.4% each), neutropenia (15.8%), and diarrhea and lymphopenia (7.9% each). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX-A has a significant response rate, expected toxicities, and should be considered for future investigation in combination with immunotherapy given the recent approvals.

High somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict response of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to first-line nab-paclitaxel plus S-1: prospective study.

AIMS: We previously showed that the nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (NPS) regimen had promising effects against metastatic pancreatic ducal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), whose efficacy however could not be precisely predicted by routine biomarkers. This prospective study aimed to investigate the values of mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their dynamic changes in predicting response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy. METHODS: Paired tumor tissue and blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with mPDAC receiving first-line NPS chemotherapy, and underwent next-generation sequencing with genomic profiling of 425 genes for ctDNA. High mutation allelic frequency (MAF) was defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 5% in tumor tissue and blood, respectively. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between mutant genes in tumor and ctDNA. Associations of mutations in ctDNA and their dynamic changes with tumor response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, and longitudinal data analysis. RESULTS: 147 blood samples and 43 paired tumor specimens from 43 patients with mPDAC were sequenced. The most common driver genes with high MAF were KRAS (tumor, 35%; ctDNA, 37%) and TP53 (tumor, 37%; ctDNA, 33%). Mutation rates of KRAS and TP53 in ctDNA were significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis, with baseline CA19-9 ≥ 2000 U/mL, and/or without an early CA19-9 response. κ values for the 5 most commonly mutated genes between tumor and ctDNA ranged from 0.48 to 0.76. MAFs of the genes mostly decreased sequentially during subsequent measurements, which significantly correlated with objective response, with an increase indicating cancer progression. High mutations of KRAS and ARID1A in both tumor and ctDNA, and of TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in ctDNA but not in tumor were significantly associated with shorter survival. When predicting 6-month OS, AUCs for the 5 most commonly mutated genes in ctDNA ranged from 0.59 to 0.84, larger than for genes in tumor (0.56 to 0.71) and for clinicopathologic characteristics (0.51 to 0.68). Repeated measurements of mutations in ctDNA significantly differentiated survival and tumor response. Among the 31 patients with ≥ 2 ctDNA tests, longitudinal analysis of changes in gene MAF showed that ctDNA progression was 60 and 58 days ahead of radiologic and CA19-9 progression for 48% and 42% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High mutations of multiple driving genes in ctDNA and their dynamic changes could effectively predict response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy, with promising reliable predictive performance superior to routine clinicopathologic parameters. Inspiringly, longitudinal ctDNA tracking could predict disease progression about 2 months ahead of radiologic or CA19-9 evaluations, with the potential to precisely devise individualized therapeutic strategies for mPDAC.

Conversion chemoradiotherapy combined with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced borderline-resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced ESCC (cT3­4, Nany, M0­1, M1 was limited to lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular area) were enrolled. All the patients received the cCRT of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin. After the cCRT, those resectable patients received esophagectomy; those unresectable patients continued to receive the definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). The locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications were calculated. RESULTS: 45 patients with ESCC treated from October 2019 to May 2021 were finally included. The median follow-up time was 30.3 months. The LRC, OS, EFS, DMFS at 1 and 2 years were 81.5%, 86.6%, 64.3%, 73.2 and 72.4%, 68.8%, 44.8%, 52.7% respectively. 21 patients (46.7%) received conversional chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (cCRT+S). The pCR rate and R0 resection rate were 47.6 and 84.0%. The LRC rate at 1 and 2 years were 95.0%, 87.1% in cCRT+S patitents and 69.3%, 58.7% in dCRT patients respectively (HR, 5.14; 95%CI, 1.10-23.94; P = 0.021). The toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were tolerated, and the most common grade 3-4 toxicitiy was radiation esophagitis (15.6%). The most common postoperative complication was pleural effusion (38.1%) and no grade ≥ IIIb complications were observed. CONCLUSION: nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin are safe as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy of ESCC.

Efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens concurrent with radiotherapy in treating locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS: Retrospective data was collected from LACC patients who were treated at our institution. These patients were categorized into three groups: the single-agent cisplatin (DDP) chemoradiotherapy group, the paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) chemoradiotherapy group, and the nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel combined with cisplatin (nPP) chemoradiotherapy group. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were enrolled (32 in the DDP group, 41 in the TP group, and 51 in the nPP group). There were differences in OS (P = 0.041, HR 0.527, 95% CI 0.314-0.884) and PFS (P = 0.003, HR 0.517, 95% CI 0.343-0.779) between the three groups. Notably, the 2-year OS rate was significantly higher in the nPP group compared to the DDP group (92.2% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.012). The 2-year PFS rates showed a marked increase in the TP group (78.0% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.048) and the nPP group (88.2% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.001) relative to the DPP group, with multiple comparisons indicating that the 2-year PFS rate was significantly superior in the nPP group versus the DDP group (88.2% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.001). Moreover, the ORR was also significantly higher in the nPP group than in the DDP group (P = 0.013); and no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of AEs among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In LACC treatment, the two cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy regimens are associated with better outcomes, with the nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen showing better efficacy than the paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen. Furthermore, the AEs associated with these regimens were deemed tolerable. These findings could provide a reference for the clinical treatment of LACC. However, further prospective studies are needed to verify it.

Randomized phase 2 study of valproic acid combined with simvastatin and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens in untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: the VESPA trial study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients have very poor prognosis highlighting the urgent need of novel treatments. In this regard, repurposing non-oncology already-approved drugs might be an attractive strategy to offer more-effective treatment easily tested in clinical trials. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic deregulation is a hallmark of cancer contributing to treatment resistance in several solid tumors, including PDAC. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are epigenetic drugs we have investigated preclinically and clinically as anticancer agents. Valproic acid (VPA) is a generic low-cost anticonvulsant and mood stabilizer with HDAC inhibitory activity, and anticancer properties also demonstrated in PDAC models. Statins use was reported to be associated with lower mortality risk in patients with pancreatic cancer and statins have been shown to have a direct antitumor effect when used alone or in combination therapy. We recently showed capability of VPA/Simvastatin (SIM) combination to potentiate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo PDAC preclinical models. METHODS/DESIGN: VESPA is a patient-centric open label randomized multicenter phase-II investigator-initiated trial, evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of VPA/SIM plus first line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens (AG or PAXG) (experimental arm) versus chemotherapy alone (standard arm) in mPDAC patients. The study involves Italian and Spanish oncology centers and includes an initial 6-patients safety run-in-phase. A sample size of 240 patients (120 for each arm) was calculated under the hypothesis that the addition of VPA/SIM to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel-based regimens may extend progression free survival from 6 to 9 months in the experimental arm. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, CA 19.9 reduction, toxicity, and quality of life. The study includes a patient engagement plan and complementary biomarkers studies on tumor and blood samples. CONCLUSIONS: VESPA is the first trial evaluating efficacy and safety of two repurposed drugs in oncology such as VPA and SIM, in combination with standard chemotherapy, with the aim of improving mPDAC survival. The study is ongoing. Enrollment started in June 2023 and a total of 63 patients have been enrolled as of June 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2022-004154-63; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05821556, posted 2023/04/20.

Survival outcome of different treatment sequences in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite some therapeutic advances, improvement in survival rates of unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been minimal over recent decade. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different treatment sequences on clinical outcomes of advanced PDAC at our academic institution. METHODS: In this single institution retrospective analysis, we assessed characteristics and survival rates of unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic PDAC patients who started a systemic treatment between 01/2015 and 12/2021. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The number of 285 patients received at least two lines of treatment, but only 137 patients were suitable for third-line treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that thirty-seven patients received A line (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel combined therapy to FOLFIRINOX) therapy, 37 patients received B line (nab-paclitaxel combined therapy to gemcitabine combined therapy to FOLFIRINOX) therapy, 21 patients received C line (nab-paclitaxel combined therapy to gemcitabine combined therapy to oxaliplatin or irinotecan combined therapy) therapy. Survival rates for different treatment lines were significantly different and median overall survival (OS) was 14.00, 18.00, and 14.00 months, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world evidence for the effectiveness of different treatment sequences and underscores the treatment sequences on survival outcome when considering the entire management in advanced PDAC.

Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study. METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive). RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA. CONCLUSION: GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.

Early tumor shrinkage as a prognostic predictor in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy: An exploratory analysis of JCOG1407.

BACKGROUND: Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a prognostic predictor for patients treated with chemotherapy in colorectal cancer, although scarce studies evaluated its potential in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). In this exploratory analysis of JCOG1407, a randomized phase II study comparing modified 5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP), we evaluated whether ETS can predict prognosis of patients with LAPC. METHODS: Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 112 with measurable lesions were included in this study. ETS was defined as a ≥20 % reduction in tumor diameter compared with baseline at the initial imaging assessment 6-10 weeks after initiating chemotherapy. Patients were divided into the ETS (achieved ETS) and non-ETS (failed to achieve ETS) groups based on their ETS status. The impact of ETS on overall survival (OS) was compared using multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen of 55 (25.5 %) and 24 of 57 (42.1 %) patients in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively, achieved ETS. In the overall population, mFOLFIRINOX arm, and GnP arm, the median OS in the ETS and non-ETS groups was 27.1 and 20.4, 29.8 and 20.6, and 24.1 and 20.4, months, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios of OS for the ETS group in the overall population, mFOLFIRINOX arm, and GnP arm were 0.451 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.270-0.754), 0.371 (95 % CI: 0.149-0.926), and 0.508 (95 % CI: 0.255-1.004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ETS may be a prognostic predictor in chemotherapy-naïve patients with LAPC treated with mFOLFIRINOX or GnP.

Economic evaluation of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine regimens for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from U.S. perspective.

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX as a potential new standard of care for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has yet to be established. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in this indication from the perspective of U.S. public payers. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of U.S. public payers, drawing on baseline patient characteristics and vital clinical data from the NAPOLI-3 trial. Costs and utilities were sourced from publicly accessible databases and literature. A lifetime horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3%. We calculated and compared cumulative costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To evaluate the model's robustness, sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and subgroup analyses were carried out. Additionally, a price simulation for the costly liposomal irinotecan was conducted to inform the pricing strategy at the given willingness to pay (WTP) threshold. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, NALIRIFOX provided an additional 0.29 QALYs with an ICER of $206,340.69 /QALY compared to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, indicating it is not cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold. Sensitivity analysis showed the model was most sensitive to the costs of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and post-progression care. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 17.66% probability of NALIRIFOX being cost-effective at $150,000/QALY, rising to 47.48% at $200,000/QALY. Pricing simulations suggested NALIRIFOX could become cost-effective at $150,000/QALY if the price of irinotecan liposome drops to $53.24/mg (a 14.8% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: NALIRIFOX may not be cost-effective at its current price as a first-line treatment for patients with mPDAC in the long term. The cost of liposomal irinotecan has the greatest impact. It may become cost-effective only if its cost is reduced by 14.8%, with a WTP threshold of $150,000 /QALY.

Safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in biliary cancer patients with peritoneal metastases.

Biliary tract cancers are a rare diagnosis with a rising incidence. Up to 20% of patients have peritoneal metastases, resulting in symptoms of ascites, abdominal pain and potential bowel obstruction. A standard of care systemic treatment comprises gemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab (gem/cis/durva). However, the clinical benefit among patients with peritoneal metastases remains unknown. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivers chemotherapy directly to the peritoneal space, which could potentially improve efficacy with minimal systemic toxicity. We describe the design of a Phase I study investigating PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel plus systemic gem/cis/durva among biliary tract cancer patients with peritoneal metastases who have not received prior systemic treatment. The primary end point is safety of PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel in combination with systemic gem/cis/durva.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05285358 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].