Combination of EGFR-TKI and Chemotherapy Versus EGFR-TKI Monotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage III-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy in patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant remains unsatisfactory. This study explored the potential benefits of combining first-generation EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-TKI at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-generation TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment were included in the combination group, and those who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy were included in the monotherapy group. The study assessed the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), downstaging rates of pathologic lymph nodes (from stage N2 to N1 or N0), major pathologic response (MPR) rate, pathological complete response (PCR) rate, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 74 631 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were screened, and 60 patients were included, 7 of whom did not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Of the remaining 53 patients, 15 received first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 38 received EGFR-TKI monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 44.12 months. The ORR was 50.0% (9/18) in the combination group and 40.5% (17/42) in the monotherapy group (P = .495). The MPR rate was 20.0% (3/15) and 10.5% (4/38) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = .359). No patients achieved PCR in the combination group, while 3 (7.89%) attained PCR in the monotherapy group. The 2 groups did not differ in N2 downstaging rate (P = .459). The median DFS was not reached in the combination group, while it was 23.6 months (95% CI: 8.16-39.02) in the monotherapy group (P = .832). Adverse events observed were consistent with those commonly associated with the 2 treatments. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with first-generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy could be considered a neoadjuvant treatment option for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC, exhibiting acceptable toxicity. However, regarding short-term efficacy, combination therapy did not demonstrate superiority over EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Long-term follow-up is warranted for a more accurate assessment of the DFS and OS.

Tucidinostat Plus Exemestane as a Neoadjuvant in Early-Stage, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of tucidinostat plus exemestane as a neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with stage II-III breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. Eligible patients received tucidinostat plus exemestane, and then breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy. RESULTS: Among 20 enrolled patients, 3 of them achieved preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score of 0. Additionally, complete cell cycle arrest was observed in 7, radiologic objective response rate in 10, and disease control rate in 20 patients, pathological complete response in 1 patient, and 5 patients performed BCS. Ki67 suppression from baseline to surgery was observed in 17 of patients, with the Ki67 change ratio of -73.5%. Treatment-emergent adverse event included neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, hypoalbuminemia, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, glutamyl transpeptidase elevation, anemia, and alanine aminotransferase elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rate of PEPI score 0 was not high, tucidinostat plus exemestane as a neoadjuvant therapy might be well tolerated and showed promising clinical responses in patients with early hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. To clarify the safety and efficacy of this strategy, further investigation is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100046678.

The role of serum thymidine kinase 1 activity in neoadjuvant-treated HER2-positive breast cancer: biomarker analysis from the Swedish phase II randomized PREDIX HER2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) plays a pivotal role in DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation. TK1 has been studied as a prognostic marker and as an early indicator of treatment response in human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative early and metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, the prognostic and predictive value of serial TK1 activity in HER2-positive BC remains unknown. METHODS: In the PREDIX HER2 trial, 197 HER2-positive BC patients were randomized to neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel (DPH) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), followed by surgery and adjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Serum samples were prospectively collected from all participants at multiple timepoints: at baseline, after cycle 1, 2, 4, and 6, at end of adjuvant therapy, annually for a total period of 5 years and/or at the time of recurrence. The associations of sTK1 activity with baseline characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. RESULTS: No association was detected between baseline sTK1 levels and all the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. An increase of TK1 activity from baseline to cycle 2 was seen in all cases. sTK1 level at baseline, after 2 and 4 cycles was not associated with pCR status. After a median follow-up of 58 months, 23 patients had EFS events. There was no significant effect between baseline or cycle 2 sTK1 activity and time to event. A non-significant trend was noted among patents with residual disease (non-pCR) and high sTK1 activity at the end of treatment visit, indicating a potentially worse long-term prognosis. CONCLUSION: sTK1 activity increased following neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive BC but was not associated with patient outcomes or treatment benefit. However, the post-surgery prognostic value in patients that have not attained pCR warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02568839. Registered on 6 October 2015.

Pathologic Processing of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer challenges the traditional processing of pathology specimens. Induction therapy before resection allows evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant agents at the time of surgery. Many clinical trials use pathologic tumor response, measured as major pathologic response (MPR, ≤10% residual viable tumor [RVT]) or complete pathologic response (CPR, 0% RVT) as a surrogate of clinical efficacy. Consequently, accurate pathologic evaluation of RVT is crucial. However, pathologic assessment has not been uniform, which is particularly true for sampling of the primary tumor, which instead of the traditional processing, requires different tissue submission because the focus has shifted from tumor typing alone to RVT scoring. Using a simulation study, we analyzed the accuracy rates of %RVT, MPR, and CPR of 31 pretreated primary lung tumors using traditional grossing compared with the gold standard of submitting the entire residual primary tumor and identified the minimum number of tumor sections to be submitted to ensure the most accurate scoring of %RVT, MPR, and CPR. Accurate %RVT, MPR, and CPR calls were achieved in 52%, 87%, and 81% of cases, respectively, using the traditional grossing method. Accuracy rates of at least 90% for these parameters require either submission of all residual primary tumor or at least 20 tumor sections. Accurate %RVT, MPR, and CPR scores cannot be achieved with traditional tumor grossing. Submission of the entire primary tumor, up to a maximum of 20 sections, is required for the most accurate reads.

Cholangitis and Interruptions of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associate with Reduced Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Interrupting chemotherapy may explain the reduced overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) with cholangitis. Endoscopic biliary decompression (BD) with metallic stents results in fewer chemotherapy interruptions and a lower cholangitis rate compared with plastic stents. We aimed to determine the impact of cholangitis, neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) interruptions and biliary stent choice on PC patients' survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 162 patients with cancer of the head of the pancreas undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy after NAT and BD documenting progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Data on BD, cholangitis, stent type, surgical radicality, and chemotherapy were collected. Survival was estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method by using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Median OS and PFS for patients with cholangitis (n = 33, 20%) were 26 and 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 20-32 and 5-10 months), respectively, compared with 36 and 17 months (95% CI 31-41 and 12-21 months; p < 0.001 for OS; p = 0.002 for PFS) for patients without cholangitis. Among patients without NAT interruptions median OS and PFS were 35 and 17 months (95% CI 31-40 and 12-21 months), falling to 26 and 7 months (95% CI 18-30 and 5-10 months) among those who experienced an NAT interruption caused by biliary stent failure (n = 26, 16%) (p = 0.039 for OS; p < 0.001 for PFS). We found no difference in OS or PFS between stent types. CONCLUSIONS: Cholangitis and NAT interruptions reduce OS and PFS among PC patients.

Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dose is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different preoperative radiation doses (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy or 50.4 Gy) on pathologic response and survival in E/GEJ cancer patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients with E/GEJ tumors, treated with curative intent between January 2009 and December 2016 in two referral centers were divided into three groups (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy) according to the dose of preoperative radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, postoperative morbidity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the three groups, with separate analyses for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). RESULTS: From the 326 patients analyzed, 48 were included in the 41.4 Gy group (14.7%), 171 in the 45 Gy group (52.5%) and 107 in the 50.4 Gy group (32.8%). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (p = 0.399). A pCR was observed in 15%, 30%, and 34% of patients in the 41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.047). A 50.4 Gy dose was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.99) in multivariate analysis. Within AC patients, pCR was observed in 6.2% of patients in the 41.4 Gy group, 29.2% of patients in the 45 Gy group, and 22.7% of patients in the 50.4 Gy group (p = 0.035). No OS or DFS differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A pCR was less common after a preoperative radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in AC patients. Radiation dose had no impact on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and recurrence.

Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment to Identify Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Disease for Extended Neoadjuvant Treatment: A New Concept.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) have a worse prognosis compared with those achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR). Earlier identification of these patients might allow timely, extended neoadjuvant treatment strategies. We explored the feasibility of a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) after NAST to identify patients with residual disease (ypT+ or ypN+) prior to surgery. METHODS: We used data from a multicenter trial, collected at 21 study sites (NCT02948764). The trial included women with cT1-3, cN0/+ breast cancer undergoing routine post-neoadjuvant imaging (ultrasound, MRI, mammography) and VAB prior to surgery. We compared the findings of VAB and routine imaging with the histopathologic evaluation of the surgical specimen. RESULTS: Of 398 patients, 34 patients with missing ypN status and 127 patients with luminal tumors were excluded. Among the remaining 237 patients, tumor cells in the VAB indicated a surgical non-pCR in all patients (73/73, positive predictive value [PPV] 100%), whereas PPV of routine imaging after NAST was 56.0% (75/134). Sensitivity of the VAB was 72.3% (73/101), and 74.3% for sensitivity of imaging (75/101). CONCLUSION: Residual cancer found in a VAB specimen after NAST always corresponds to non-pCR. Residual cancer assumed on routine imaging after NAST corresponds to actual residual cancer in about half of patients. Response assessment by VAB is not safe for the exclusion of residual cancer. Response assessment by biopsies after NAST may allow studying the new concept of extended neoadjuvant treatment for patients with residual disease in future trials.

Prognostic Significance of Biologic Factors in Patients with a Modest Radiologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers: Impact of the Combination Index of Sialyl-Lewis Antigen-Related Tumor Markers.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate re-evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is important for optimal treatment selection. Nonetheless, determining the operative eligibility of patients with a modest radiologic response remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of biologic factors for patients showing a modest radiologic response to NAT and investigate the tumor markers (TMs), CA19-9 alone, DUPAN-II alone, and their combination, to create an index that combines these sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs associated with treatment outcomes. METHODS: This study enrolled patients deemed to have a "stable disease" by RECIST classification with slight progression (tumor size increase rate, ≤20%) as their radiologic response after NAT. A sialyl-Lewis-related index (sLe index), calculated by adding one fourth of the serum DUPAN-II value to the CA19-9 value, was created. The prognostic significances of CA19-9, DUPAN-II, and the sLe index were assessed in relation to postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: An sLe index lower than the cutoff value (45.25) was significantly associated with favorable disease-free survival. Moreover, the post-NAT sLe index had a higher area under the curve value for recurrence within 24 months than the post-NAT levels of CA19-9 or DUPAN-II alone. Multivariable analysis showed that a post-NAT sLe index higher than 45.25 was the single independent predictive factor for recurrence within 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Additional evaluation of biologic factors can potentially enhance patient selection, particularly for patients showing a limited radiologic response to NAT. The authors' index is a simple indicator for the biologic evaluation of multiple combined sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs and may offer a better predictive significance.

Safety and efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: real-world data from NeoPowER study.

BACKGROUND: The addition of pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (H) and standard chemotherapy (CT) as neoadjuvant treatment (NaT) for patients with HER2 + breast cancer (BC), has shown to increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, without main safety concerns. The aim of NeoPowER trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of P + H + CT in a real-world population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of stage II-III, HER2 + BC patients treated with NaT: who received P + H + CT (neopower group) in 5 Emilia Romagna institutions were compared with an historical group who received H + CT (control group). The primary endpoint was the safety, secondary endpoints were pCR rate, DRFS and OS and their correlation to NaT and other potential variables. RESULTS: 260 patients were included, 48% received P + H + CT, of whom 44% was given anthraciclynes as part of CT, compared to 83% in the control group. The toxicity profile was similar, excluding diarrhea more frequent in the neopower group (20% vs. 9%). Three patients experienced significant reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all receiving anthracyclines. The pCR rate was 46% (P + H + CT) and 40% (H + CT) (p = 0.39). The addition of P had statistically correlation with pCR only in the patients receiving anthra-free regimens (OR = 3.05,p = 0.047). Preoperative use of anthracyclines (OR = 1.81,p = 0.03) and duration of NaT (OR = 1.18,p = 0.02) were statistically related to pCR. 12/21 distant-relapse events and 14/17 deaths occurred in the control group. Patients who achieve pCR had a significant increase in DRFS (HR = 0.23,p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Adding neoadjuvant P to H and CT is safe. With the exception of diarrhea, rate of adverse events of grade > 2 did not differ between the two groups. P did not increase the cardiotoxicity when added to H + CT, nevertheless in our population all cardiac events occurred in patients who received anthracycline-containing regimens. Not statistically significant, higher pCR rate is achievable in patients receiving neoadjuvant P + H + CT. The study did not show a statistically significant correlation between the addition of P and long-term outcomes.

Utilization and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given increased utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric adenocarcinoma, practice patterns deviating from standard of care (upfront resection) remain unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with NAT use and survival outcomes among early-stage gastric cancers. METHODS: The National Cancer Database identified patients with early-stage (T1N0M0) gastric cancer (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with NAT utilization compared to upfront surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 6452 patients with early-stage gastric cancer, 626 (9.7%) received NAT. Patients who received NAT were more likely treated at community hospitals, had moderate to poorly differentiated disease, and tumors located in the cardia (all p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 1,248 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 37.1 months (IQR 20.2-64.0) versus 45.6 months (IQR 22.5-72.8) for resection (p < 0.001). Treatment with NAT remained independently predictive of worse OS on Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who received NAT had more aggressive prognostic features, NAT was associated with worse OS despite accounting for this selection bias. These results highlight the importance of adhering to guidelines, regardless of differing disease characteristics, which has significant implications on outcomes.

Comparison of perioperative and histopathologic outcomes among neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locoregional gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiation (NCRT) have demonstrated improved survival for gastric cancer. However, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment remains unclear. We sought to evaluate perioperative and histopathologic outcomes among neoadjuvant treatments for locoregional gastric cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database queried patients who received NAC or NCRT followed by resection for T2-T4 and/or node-positive gastric cancer (2006-2018). Logistic and Poisson regression assessed perioperative (30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day mortality, length of stay [LOS]) and histopathologic outcomes (pathologic complete response [PCR], margin status, and negative pathologic lymph nodes [ypN0]). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 9831 patients, 4221 (42.9%) received NAC and 5610 (57.1%) NCRT. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes, apart from patients treated with NCRT exhibiting increased LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.16). Patients who received NCRT were more likely to achieve PCR, margin-negative resection, and ypN0 (all p < 0.05). Median OS was 36.8 months for NAC and 33.6 months for NCRT (p < 0.001). NCRT independently predicted worse OS (vs. NAC, hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18). CONCLUSION: NCRT was associated with better histologic tumor response although NAC was associated with improved OS. Better understanding prognostication through histologic assessment following neoadjuvant therapy is needed.

MRI-defined T3, clear mesorectal fascia mid-low rectal cancer: is neoadjuvant treatment necessary?

AIM: Neoadjuvant treatments (nCRT) are becoming the standard treatment for patients with stage II or III mid-low rectal cancer. Recently, some studies have shown that surgery alone may be sufficient for patients with T3 rectal cancer. This raises the question of whether nCRT is necessary for all patients with T3 rectal cancer. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF mid-low rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (TME group) or nCRT followed by surgery (nCRT + TME group). METHODS: A total of 1509 patients were enrolled in this study. After a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, 480 patients were included in each group. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints included the perioperative outcomes, histopathologic outcomes, and other follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: nCRT had advantages in rates of sphincter-preserving surgery and tumor downstaging, but it was accompanied by a higher rate of enterostomies. At 3 years after surgery, local recurrence occurred in 3.3% of patients in the TME group and in 3.5% of patients in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.914), the DFS rates were 78.3% in the TME group and 75.3% in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.188), and the overall survival rates were 90.3% in the TME group and 89.9% in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.776). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery alone versus nCRT followed by surgery may provide similar long-term oncological outcomes for patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF, and mid-low rectal cancer. nCRT may cause overtreatment in some patients.

Neoadjuvant Short- Vs. Long-Course Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: How to Choose.

OPINION STATEMENT: Over the past decades, the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved dramatically due to improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique, and the addition of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Fractionation of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy remains the subject of discussion and the question multiple recent trials have aimed to answer. In light of recent data and concern for locoregional recurrence, our institution favors long-course chemoradiation in most cases, especially in low-lying primaries, threatened circumferential resection margin, consideration of non-operative management, or if the surgeon has concerns for resectability. Exceptions would include cases of oligometastatic disease planned for metastasectomy in which curative-intent treatment was pursued or if additional factors required a reduction in treatment time.

Rectal cancer - avoiding surgery?

Nonoperative treatment of rectal cancer is gaining popularity. Several trials recently demonstrated advantages in disease-free survival with total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with the addition of the watch and wait (WW) strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer. On longer follow-up, an unexpected increased risk in local recurrence in the TNT group at the RAPIDO trial suggested early surgery for nonresponding tumours. The WW option is globally accepted for a complete clinical response; however, a high rate of regrowth was found in a registry with an increased risk of distant metastases, questioning the deleterious effect of deferral of surgery in this group. The short- and long-term toxic effects of neoadjuvant treatment are costs to consider in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines compared with the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines, which favour surgery alone if good mesorectal resection is assured with increasing surgical proficiency adjusted to the precise anatomical location.

Mapping of lymph node metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment: a prospective analysis from a high-volume institution in China.

The study aimed to describe the prevalence of lymph node metastases per lymph node station for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant treatment. Clinicopathological variables of ESCC patients were retrieved from the prospective database of the Surgical Esophageal Cancer Patient Registry in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. A two-field lymphadenectomy was routinely performed, and an extensive three-field lymphadenectomy was performed if cervical lymph node metastasis was suspected. According to AJCC/UICC 8, lymph node stations were investigated separately. The number of patients with metastatic lymph nodes divided by those who underwent lymph node dissection at that station was used to define the percentage of patients with lymph node metastases. Data are also separately analyzed according to the pathological response of the primary tumor, neoadjuvant treatment regimens, pretreatment tumor length, and tumor location. Between January 2019 and March 2023, 623 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by transthoracic esophagectomy were enrolled. Lymph node metastases were found in 212 patients (34.0%) and most frequently seen in lymph nodes along the right recurrent nerve (10.1%, 58/575), paracardial station (11.4%, 67/587), and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (10.9%, 65/597). For patients with pretreatment tumor length of >4 cm and non-pathological complete response of the primary tumor, the metastatic rate of the right lower cervical paratracheal lymph nodes is 10.9% (10/92) and 10.6% (11/104), respectively. For patients with an upper thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most frequently seen along the right recurrent nerve (14.2%, 8/56). For patients with a middle thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most commonly seen in the right lower cervical paratracheal lymph nodes (10.3%, 8/78), paracardial lymph nodes (10.2%, 29/285), and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (10.4%, 30/289). For patients with a lower thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most frequently seen in the paracardial station (14.2%, 35/247) and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (13.1%, 33/252). The study precisely determined the distribution of lymph node metastases in ESCC after neoadjuvant treatment, which may help to optimize the extent of lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of ESCC patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

Development and evaluation of the Newstage system: integrating tumor regression grade and lymph node status for improved prognostication in neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The predictive correlation of tumor depth of invasion changes after neoadjuvant therapy, and the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) ypTNM system for gastric cancer may not accurately predict patient prognosis following neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 258 patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. The Newstage system was established based on tumor regression grade and pathological lymph node status. The 3-year survival rates of patients classified by the Newstage system were compared with those classified by the AJCC ypTNM system. RESULTS: In a cohort of 258 patients, the 3-year overall survival rates based on the Newstage system were: (I) 94.6%, (II) 79.3%, (III) 54.5%, and (IV) 30.2%. The Newstage system exhibited a lower Akaike information criterion value (902.57 vs. 912.03). Additionally, the area under the ROC curve (0.756 vs. 0.733) and the C-index (0.731 vs. 0.718) was higher than the AJCC ypTNM system. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis indicated that the Newstage system was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Newstage system exhibits superior predictive performance in estimating survival rates for neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer. It also functions as an independent prognostic factor.

Metabolic Signatures: Pioneering the Frontier of Rectal Cancer Diagnosis and Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment with Biomarkers-A Systematic Review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most aggressive, heterogenous, and fatal types of human cancer for which screening, and more effective therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. Early-stage detection and treatment greatly improve the 5-year survival rate. In the era of targeted therapies for all types of cancer, a complete metabolomic profile is mandatory before neoadjuvant therapy to assign the correct drugs and check the response to the treatment given. The aim of this study is to discover specific metabolic biomarkers or a sequence of metabolomic indicators that possess precise diagnostic capabilities in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. After searching the keywords, a total of 108 articles were identified during a timeframe of 10 years (2013-2023). Within this set, one article was excluded due to the use of non-English language. Six scientific papers were qualified for this investigation after eliminating all duplicates, publications not referring to the subject matter, open access restriction papers, and those not applicable to humans. Biomolecular analysis found a correlation between metabolomic analysis of colorectal cancer samples and poor progression-free survival rates. Biomarkers are instrumental in predicting a patient's response to specific treatments, guiding the selection of targeted therapies, and indicating resistance to certain drugs.

The Role of Lymph Node Downstaging Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in a Group of Patients with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer.

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent type of neoplasia in women. It is most commonly caused by the persistent infection with high-risk strands of human papillomavirus (hrHPV). Its incidence increases rapidly from age 25 when routine HPV screening starts and then decreases at the age of 45. This reflects both the diagnosis of prevalent cases at first-time screening and the likely peak of HPV exposure in early adulthood. For early stages, the treatment offers the possibility of fertility preservation.. However, in more advanced stages, the treatment is restricted to concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, combined, in very selected cases with surgical intervention. After the neoadjuvant treatment, an imagistic re-evaluation of the patients is carried out to analyze if the stage of the disease remained the same or suffered a downstaging. Lymph node downstaging following neoadjuvant treatment is regarded as an indubitable prognostic factor for predicting disease recurrence and survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer. This study aims to ascertain the important survival role of radiotherapy in the downstaging of the disease and of lymphadenectomy in the control of lymph node invasion for patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer. Material and Methods: We describe the outcome of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 FIGO treated at Bucharest Oncological Institute. All patients received radiotherapy and two-thirds received concomitant chemotherapy. A surgical intervention consisting of type C radical hysterectomy with radical pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed six to eight weeks after the end of the neoadjuvant treatment. Results: The McNemar test demonstrated the regression of lymphadenopathies after neoadjuvant treatment-p: <0.001. However, the persistence of adenopathies was not related to the dose of irradiation (p: 0.61), the number of sessions of radiotherapy (p: 0.80), or the chemotherapy (p: 0.44). Also, there were no significant differences between the adenopathies reported by imagistic methods and those identified during surgical intervention-p: 0.62. The overall survival evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves is dependent on the post-radiotherapy FIGO stage-p: 0.002 and on the lymph node status evaluated during surgical intervention-p: 0.04. The risk factors associated with an increased risk of death were represented by a low preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.003) and by the advanced FIGO stage determined during surgical intervention (p-value: 0.006 for stage IIIA and 0.01 for stage IIIC1). In the multivariate Cox model, the independent predictor of survival was the preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.004, HR 0.535, CI: 0.347 to 0.823). Out of a total of 33 patients with neoadjuvant treatment, 22 survived until the end of the study, all 33 responded to the treatment in varying degrees, but in 3 of them, tumor cells were found in the lymph nodes during the intraoperative histopathological examination. Conclusions: For advanced cervical cancer patients, radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment may be associated with a better survival rate. Further research is needed to identify all the causes that lead to the persistence of adenopathies in certain patients, to decrease the FIGO stage after surgical intervention, and, therefore, to lower the risk of death. Also, it is mandatory to correctly evaluate and treat the anemia, as it seems to be an independent predictor factor for mortality.

Prognostic role of pathologic status other than complete response after neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was performed to investigate the survival differences according to the pathologic status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and to investigate whether current AJCC 8th ypStage can predict survival accurately. METHODS: Data of 563 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for ESCC between 1994 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.00 ± 8.01 years, of which 524 (93.1%) were males. The median follow-up period was 29.12 months. A total of 153 (27.1%) patients showed pathologic complete response (pCR) and 92 (16.3%) patients showed pCR of the primary lesion with residual metastatic lymph nodes (ypT0N +). A total of 196 (35%) and 122 (21.6%) patients showed ypT + N + and ypT + N, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of each group was 75.1% (CR), 42.4% (ypT + N0), 54.9% (ypT0N +), and 26.1% (ypT + N +); CR patients showed better survival than the other groups, and no survival differences were found in the 5-year OS between ypT + N0 and ypT0N + patients (p = 0.811). In ypStage I, there were survival differences between ypT0N0 and ypTis-2N0 patients, and ypT1N0 (ypStage I) and ypT0N1 (ypStageIIIA) showed similar OS (5-year OS in 49.3% vs. 67.1%, p = 0.623). CONCLUSIONS: pCR offers long-term survival in patients; however, survival significantly declines with the presence of residual primary lesion and nodal metastases.

Outcomes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved a pathological complete response in the primary lesion by neoadjuvant treatment: a Japanese nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Minimal data was reported regarding the characteristics, risks of lymph node metastasis, and prognostic factors in esophageal cancer patients who achieved remarkable response in the primary lesion to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). METHODS: This study evaluated the nationwide data of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent surgery following NAT in Japan. Of 4484 patients, 300 (6.7%) had ypT0 following NAT and curative esophagectomy. Factors associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) were administered in 260 (86.2%) and 40 (13.8%) patients, respectively. Pathologically, 72 (24.0%) had lymph node metastasis (residual nodal disease; RND), and pretherapeutic lymph node metastasis was the independent risk factor for RND (odd ratio [OR]: 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-8.20; P = 0.008). The 5-year overall and relapse-free survivals were significantly longer in patients with pathological complete response (pCR) than in those with RND (both P < 0.001). Pretherapeutic cT3 or T4a tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02-2.88; P = 0.043), RND (HR: 3.30; 95% CI: 1.98-5.50; P < 0.001), and operative blood loss (Liter, HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.19; P = 0.021) were independent risk factors affecting relapse-free survival in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients with ypT0 after NAT, 24.0% had RND, and pretherapeutic lymph node metastasis was the risk factor. In addition, pretherapeutic cT3, or T4a tumors, RND, and operative blood loss were the poor prognosticators in patients with ypT0 after NAT.