Excisional biopsy of perforated gastric ulcer: mandatory or potentially harmful?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the morbidity associated with excisional biopsy in patients with spontaneous gastric perforation. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was performed. All consecutive patients with spontaneous gastric perforation who underwent surgical therapy were included. Outcomes were assessed concerning the performance of excisional biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 135 adult patients were enrolled. Of these, 110 (81.5%) patients underwent excisional biopsy, while 17 (12.6%) did not. The remaining eight (5.9%) patients who underwent gastric resection were excluded from the analysis. Patients undergoing excisional biopsy developed significantly higher rates of postoperative complications (p = 0.007) and experienced more severe complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly type III and above (p = 0.017). However, no significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, reoperation, suture dehiscence, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Excisional biopsy for gastric perforation has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity. Surgical closure followed by early endoscopic biopsy may be a superior approach for gastric perforation management to rule out malignancy.

[Laparoscopic repair for perforated ulcer]. / Videolaparoskopicheskii sposob ushivaniya perforativnoi yazvy.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the immediate postoperative results in patients with perforated ulcers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study enrolled 25 patients with perforated peptic ulcer (diameter of perforation <8 mm). Mean age of patients was 39 years (range 24-56), perforation size - 5.92 mm (range 3-8). RESULTS: Mean surgery time was 59.8 min (range 50-85). There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications. All patients were discharged. CONCLUSION: The proposed method of repair for perforated gastric ulcers is simple, effective, safe and may be recommended for clinical practice.

Endoscopic and histopathological assessment of individuals undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass: a 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is much debate over the occurrence of biliary reflux to the gastric pouch after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and its potential risks. OBJECTIVE: To assess endoscopic and histopathological findings following a standardized protocol of biopsy collection two years after OAGB. METHODS: A historical cohort study was conducted, based on a prospectively collected database, which involved 39 participants who underwent OAGB. Participants underwent clinical evaluation and esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the time of surgery and 24 months afterward. Post-operatively, biopsy specimens in esophagogastric junction, pouch, and anastomosis were systematically collected. RESULTS: 92.3% of the participants were female and the mean age was 37 ± 8.5 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) significantly decreased from 37.6 ± 5.7 kg/m2 to 27 ± 4.1 kg/m2 after 2 years (p < 0.001). The mean %TWL was 27.2 ± 10.5%. The prevalence of non-erosive gastritis significantly increased from 25.6 to 51.3% (p = 0.02). Erosive gastritis significantly decreased from 28.2 to 10.3% (p = 0.04). Four cases of marginal ulcers were identified (10.3%). The commonest histopathological finding was mild inflammation in 74.3% (esophagogastric junction), 58.9% (pouch), and 71.8% (anastomosis). There was one case of focal intestinal metaplasia in each site of interest and no cases of dysplasia or severe inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized protocol of post-operative biopsy collection, low rates of severe endoscopic and histopathological abnormalities were observed two years after OAGB. Nevertheless, as most patients have histologically proven inflammation, bile in the gastric pouch, and endoscopic gastritis, long-term surveillance is essential because of the uncertain risk of these abnormalities.

Vonoprazan vs. Lansoprazole for the treatment of endoscopic submucosal dissection induced gastric ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan is a potassium competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) approved in Japan in 2014 to treat endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers and bleeding or perforation. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Vonoprazan is more effective than Lansoprazole in the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers which include ulcer healing and shrinking rate, among others. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective studies were collected from the PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library databases. Meanwhile, studies were selected according to predetermined qualification criteria and data were extracted by two researchers. The quality of the methods for published papers was evaluated using the modified Jadad scale. RESULTS: Five studies were included in this meta-analysis, the ulcer healing rate effect was not significantly higher in the intervention groups than in the control groups at 4 weeks, [OR：1.07 (0.51, 2.22), 95% CI, I2=2%, Z=0.18, P=0.86]. There was no significant difference in the ulcer shrinkage rate at 4 weeks [MD：0.20 (-1.51, 1.92), 95% CI, I2=0%, P=0.82] and 8 weeks [MD: -0.09 (-0.30, 0.12), 95% CI, I2=0%, P=0.39]. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between Vonoprazan and Lansoprazole in the ulcers induced by treatment after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment with ESD.

[A Case of Primary Gastric Lymphoma with Spontaneous Perforation].

An 85-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with the chief complaint of sudden upper abdominal pain. The patient suffered from anorexia and epigastric pain for a month, and a local physician suspected a diagnosis of gastric ulcer. An abdominal computed tomography(CT)scan showed intraperitoneal free air as well as irregular thickening and thinning of the gastric wall. Gastric ulcer perforation was suspected, and an emergency operation was performed. Surgical findings showed thickening of the gastric wall in the pylorus and gastric corpus but partial thinning of areas of the anterior wall of the gastric corpus with a perforation measuring 5 mm. A distal gastrectomy and reconstruction were performed using the Billroth Ⅱ method. The histopathological diagnosis was malignant gastric lymphoma(diffuse large B- cell lymphoma). Considering the patient's age and general condition, chemotherapy was not administered after surgery. The patient was alive without recurrence 8 months after the operation.

[Laparoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers]. / Laparoskopicheskaya tekhnologiya lecheniya probodnykh yazv zheludka i dvenadtsatiperstnoi kishki.

The review is devoted to laparoscopic technology in the treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Searching for literature data was performed in the PubMed, Google, Springer Link online library, Cochrane Systematic Review databases. We analyzed reviews, prospective and retrospective studies devoted to various strategies in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological features of these patients, indications and contraindications for endoscopic suturing of perforations, features of laparoscopic procedures and causes of conversions to open surgery were studied. Finally, we compared the results of laparoscopic and open surgeries.

Scheduled second look endoscopy after endoscopic hemostasis to patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation of second look endoscopy (SLOGD) in selected patients at high risk for rebleeding has been inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of SLOGD in selected patients predicted at high risk of recurrent bleeding. METHODS: From a cohort of 939 patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who underwent endoscopic hemostasis, we derived a 9-point risk score (age > 60, Male, ulcer ≥ 2 cm in size, posterior bulbar or lesser curve gastric ulcer, Forrest I bleeding, haemoglobin < 8 g/dl) to predict recurrent bleeding. We then validated the score in another cohort of 1334 patients (AUROC 0.77). To test the hypothesis that SLOGD in high-risk patients would improve outcomes, we did a randomized controlled trial to compare scheduled SLOGD with observation alone in those predicted at high risk of rebleeding (a score of ≥ 5). The primary outcome was clinical bleeding within 30 days of the index bleed. RESULTS: Of 314 required, we enrolled 157 (50%) patients (SLOGD n = 78, observation n = 79). Nine (11.8%) in SLOGD group and 14 (18.2%) in observation group reached primary outcome (absolute difference 6.4%, 95% CI - 5.0% to 17.8%). Twenty-one of 69 (30.4%) patients who underwent SLOGD needed further endoscopic treatment. No surgery for bleeding control was needed. There were 6 vs. 3 of 30-day deaths in either group (p = 0.285, log rank). No difference was observed regarding blood transfusion and hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In this aborted trial that enrolled patients with bleeding peptic ulcers at high-risk of recurrent bleeding, scheduled SLOGD did not significantly improve outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS: gov:NCT02352155.

Primary repair of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated full thickness gastrointestinal ulcers in 11 dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of dogs that underwent primary repair of gastroduodenal perforations associated with the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). A secondary objective was to identify clinicopathological findings that predisposed dogs to postoperative death. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Eleven dogs with complete gastric or duodenal perforation related to administration of an NSAID that underwent primary surgical repair. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for dogs that presented with peritonitis due to a complete gastroduodenal perforation while receiving NSAIDs between November, 2011 and January, 2021. Data collected included patient characteristics, clinical signs, clinicopathological results, surgical details, and postoperative management and outcome. RESULTS: All dogs were large breeds (mean weight 42 kg; range 22-75 kg), with a mean age of 7.35 years. Nine dogs from a total of 11 (82 %) received a concurrent corticosteroid and NSAID, or a higher dose/frequency/length of NSAID administration than recommended by the manufacturer. All gastroduodenal perforations were found in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Eight of 11 (73%) dogs survived to discharge. The median postoperative duration of follow up was 444 days (range 2-1460 days). No association was detected between ulcer size or location and mortality. CONCLUSION: Most dogs who underwent primary repair of complete gastroduodenal ulcers survived. Gastroduodenal perforations were generally due to the administration of higher or longer doses of NSAIDs, or concurrent administration of another NSAID or corticosteroid. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Primary closure may be associated with a high success rate in dogs with full thickness gastroduodenal ulcers.

Gastrocolic fistula as a rare complication of a benign gastric ulcer.

We report a case of a 77-year-old man presented with abdominal pain, melena and weight loss.He underwent endoscopic evaluation revealed a 1.2cmX0.6cm ulcer of the greater curve of the antrum stomach and a 1.3cm fistulous tract .The gastroscope can smoothly enter the transverse colon through the fistula tract, and we can be able to visualize the colon wall and feces.After the diagnosis of gastrocolic fistula based on endoscopic findings. The patient was referred for surgical evaluation and underwent laparotomy. The patient subsequently underwent en-bloc resection of the fistula, a segment of the transverse colon, gastric perforation repair, intestinal adhesion lysis and peritoneal drainage. Examination of the specimen revealed a fistulous communication between the stomach and resected transverse colon segment. Finally, the patient was discharged 10 days after operation and without further complication.

[Morphological substantiation of laparoscopic suturing of stomach ulcer with formation of a covered perforation]. / Morfologicheskoe obosnovanie laparoskopicheskogo sposoba ushivaniya probodnoi yazvy zheludka s formirovaniem prikrytoi perforatsii.

OBJECTIVE: Morphological substantiation of laparoscopic suturing of gastric ulcer with formation of a covered perforation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To analyze morphological tissue reaction in surgical area, we used 12 Chinchilla rabbits. All animals were divided into 2 groups by 6 animals. The main group enrolled rabbits undergoing suturing of perforated gastric ulcer with formation of a covered perforation by anterior stomach wall. In the control group, gastric perforation was sutured by conventional double-row suture. For histological analysis, 2 animals in each group were withdrawn from the experiment after 7, 14 and 21 days. We excised gastric wall within the area of perforation closure. Morphological data on healing process were compared between both groups. RESULTS. S: Tomach deformation after 7 days was more severe in the main group compared to simple suturing. However, these differences were absent after 21 days. Morphological analysis revealed postoperative transmural necrosis after 7 days. Signs of early epithelialization were more obvious in the main group. After 21 postoperative days, we observed almost completely restored differentiation of stomach wall layers in both groups of animals.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: An ACS-NSQIP Study.

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a surgical emergency needing swift operative resolution. While laparoscopic and open approaches are viable options, it remains unclear whether laparoscopic repair has significantly improved outcomes. We use a national surgical database to compare perioperative and 30-d postoperative (30POP) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2016-2018 ACS-NSQIP database was used to create the patient cohort, using ICD-10 and CPT codes. An unmatched analysis identified factors that likely contributed to the laparoscopic versus open treatment allocation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify outcomes that were not explained by underlying differences in the patient cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 3475 patients were included: 3135 in open group (OG), 340 (~10%) in laparoscopic group (LG). After PSM to control for comorbidities and illness severity that differed between groups on univariate analysis, 288 patients remained in each group. Analysis of the matched cohorts revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality (5.9% OG versus 3.8% LG, P = 0.245). The LG had significantly longer operative times (92 versus 79 min, P = 0.003), shorter hospital stays (8.2 versus 9.4 d, P = 0.044) and higher probability of being discharged home (81% versus 73%, P = 0.017). 30POP outcomes were largely equivalent, except that OG had higher risk for bleeding (14.6% versus 8%, P = 0.012) and pneumonia (8.7% versus 4.5%, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: While laparoscopic repairs take longer, they lead to shorter hospital stays and higher likelihood of discharge home. Further study to identify patients that are candidates for this technique is warranted.

Endoscopic Closure Utilizing Endoloop and Endoclips After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Antithrombotic therapy is a well-known independent risk factor for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer (EGC). A novel method of ulcer base closure using an endoloop and endoclips has been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic closure using an endoloop and endoclips in preventing post-ESD bleeding in patients undergoing gastric ESD on antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study. Patients on antithrombotic therapy who underwent gastric ESD were divided into two groups, the closure group and the non-closure group. We analyzed procedural outcomes, post-ESD bleeding rate and factors associated with post-ESD bleeding. RESULTS: Among 400 ESDs with EGCs in 311 patients, 131 ESDs in 110 patients were in the closure group, and 269 ESDs in 217 patients were in the non-closure group (16 patients were overlapped in both groups). Post-ESD bleeding rate was 11.5% (15/131) in the closure group, and 11.9% (32/269) in the non-closure group (p = 0.89). Total sustained closure rate during second look endoscopy was 47.8% (33/69). Post-ESD bleeding rate tended to be lower in the closure group than in the non-closure group for lesions located in the greater curvature (3.6% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.11). In addition, sustained closure rate was significantly higher in the greater curvature than in the lesser curvature (72.0% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed resection size > 40 mm and heparin bridge were the independent risk factor for post-ESD bleeding. CONCLUSION: Ulcer base closure using endoloop and endoclips did not prevent post-ESD bleeding in patients on antithrombotic therapy.

Marginal ulceration following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: risk factors for ulcer development, recurrence and need for revisional surgery.

BACKGROUND: Marginal ulcer formation is a known complication following RYGB. While most respond to medical therapy, many patients have recurrent or chronic MU. Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, smoking and Helicobacter pylori infection are known risk factors of MU, little is known about what increases the likelihood of developing recalcitrant ulcers. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for marginal ulcer (MU) formation, including recalcitrant ulcers requiring surgical revision, and to define the incidence and outcomes of revisional surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent RYGB between 2011 and 2017 at a high-volume academic center were included. Patients with a postoperative diagnosis of MU were identified from the institution's bariatric database. Patient characteristics, operative data and surgical outcomes were analyzed using data collected in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and the Ontario Bariatric Registry. RESULTS: A total of 2830 RYGB were performed during the study period. The incidence of MU was 6.9% with 1% of patients requiring revisional surgery for a recalcitrant ulcer. Patients with a history of smoking (HR 5.03), immunosuppression (HR 4.60) and preoperative NSAID use (HR 3.11) were significantly more likely to develop a MU requiring surgical revision. Patients undergoing revision reported resolution of their symptoms in only 36% of cases with 57% developing a recurrent ulcer. CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of smoking and use of immunosuppressive medication were at significantly higher risk of developing MU that failed medical therapy. Additional evidence is needed to inform perioperative management of bariatric patients.

[Modern aspects of the complex treatment of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcer]. / Sovremennye aspekty kompleksnogo lecheniya perforativnoi yazvy zheludka i dvenadtsatiperstnoi kishki.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for perforated gastric ulcer in a surgical hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the treatment of 693 patients with perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers was carried out. Laparoscopic and open surgeries were performed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica and MS Excel software packages. Student t-test was applied for independent samples and Fisher's F-test was calculated. RESULTS: Combined therapy included surgical treatment (suturing of the ulcer as a rule) and medication with proton pump inhibitors, antibacterial drugs. Over the past 5 years, postoperative quality of life has been significantly improved in patients with perforated ulcers. Stomach resection and vagotomy for perforated ulcers will become historical in the near future. Laparoscopic and open procedures ensure similar periods of ulcer closure. CONCLUSION: Currently, successful treatment of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers requires an integrated approach at all levels of specialized care and is impossible without modern pharmacotherapy.

The recurrent bleeding risk of a Forrest IIc lesion at the second-look endoscopy can be indicated by high Rockall scores ≥ 6.

BACKGROUND: The Forrest classification is widely applied to guide endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding. Accordingly, practice guidelines suggest medical treatment only for ulcer with a Forrest IIc lesion because it has low rebleeding risk even without endoscopic therapy, ranging from 0 to 13%. However, the risk ranges widely and it is unclear who is at risk of rebleeding with such a lesion. This study assessed whether the Rockall score, which evaluates patients holistically, could indicate the risk of recurrent bleeding among patients with a Forrest IIc lesion at the second-look endoscopy. METHODS: Patients who had peptic ulcer bleeding with Ia-IIb lesions received endoscopic hemostasis at the primary endoscopy, and they were enrolled if their Ia-IIb lesions had been fading to IIc at the second-look endoscopy after 48- to 72-h intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion. Primary outcomes were rebleeding during the 4th-14th day and 4th-28th day after the first bleeding episode. RESULTS: The prospective cohort study enrolled 140 patients, who were divided into a Rockall scores ≥ 6 group or a Rockall scores < 6 group. The rebleeding rates in the Rockall scores ≥ 6 group and the Rockall scores < 6 group during the 4th-14th day and the 4th-28th day were 13/70 (18.6%) versus 2/70 (2.9%), p = 0.003 and 17/70 (24.3%) versus 3/70 (4.3%), p = 0.001, respectively, based on an intention-to-treat analysis and 5/62 (8.1%) versus 0/68 (0%), p = 0.023 and 6/59 (10.2%) versus 0/67 (0%), p = 0.009, respectively, based on a per-protocol analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the Rockall scores ≥ 6 group had a significantly lower cumulative rebleeding-free proportion than the Rockall scores < 6 group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined Rockall scores ≥ 6 on arrival with a Forrest IIc lesion at the second-look endoscopy can identify patients at risk of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding following initial endoscopic and intravenous PPI treatment. Trial registration Trial registration identifier: NCT01591083.

Gastroduodenal Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients - Case Series and Literature Review.

Specific risk factors for gastroduodenal surgery in cirrhotic patients have been identified, which dictates for a more personalized management. The retrospective study was conducted between 2012-2019 on twelve patients (7 cases of duodenal ulcer, 2 cases of gastric ulcer and 3 patients with gastric cancer). We took into account a number of possible factors involved in the unfavorable evolution of patients, based on data published in the literature so far. In order to follow the involvement of each factor we compared two groups of patients, one with unfavorable evolutions, exitus and another with favorable evolutions. Emergency surgery, the presence of ascites at the time of intervention, a higher than 30 MELD score, alcoholic cirrhosis, liver encephalopathy and liver failure are common factors that are found in a high percentage (between 75% and 100%) in patients who have had an unfavorable evolution, exitus. The same risk factors are found in much lower percentages in patients who have evolved favorably postoperatively, most between 12.5% and 25%. We analyzed preoperative aspects, surgical approach, complications and risk factors for these patients, compared them with the results of our study and identified future therapeutic possibilities. For CHILD B or C patients, the indication for surgery should be discussed in advance with a multidisciplinary team. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or discontinuation of D2 dissection should be considered in these patients.

; RESULTS OF RESECTION METHODS OF TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH GIANT PYLORODUODENAL ULCERS COMPLICATED BY PERFORATION AND BLEEDING.

We studied the immediate and long-term results of various methods of gastric resection in 35 patients operated at the S.S. Yudin State Medical Center in Moscow from 2000 to 2019. 20 (57.1%) patients were operated on for perforation, and 15 (42.6%) patients underwent surgery for ulcerative bleeding. There were 27 (77.2%) males and 8 (22.8%) females. The average age of patients was 48.3±2.3 years. The diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease was previously made in 24 (68.6%) patients, the duration of the disease was 7.7±2.7 years. Of the 35 patients, 29 (82.8%) underwent standard gastric resection without vagotomy with Billroth-II anastomosis in various modifications and 6 (17.2%) underwent pylorobulbar resection with Billroth-I anastomosis with bilateral stem vagotomy. According to the analysis of the results of surgical interventions, gastric resection was accompanied by a significant number of early postoperative complications observed in 18 (51.4% of patients): associated with the nature of the operation, 10 and 5 patients had complications from the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The most frequent complication due to the nature of surgery was a clinically significant violation of the evacuation function of the stomach stump, which developed in 8 of 35 (22.8%) patients. In 4 patients after pylorobulbar resection, the violation of the evacuation function of the stump was due to its parasympathetic denervation. The remaining 4 patients after standard resection of gastric stasis stump occurred due to maintenance of anastomositis of gastrojejunal anastomosis. Post-vagotomic diarrhea: observed in 3 of 6 patients: 1 patient of moderate severity, and 2 patients-mild. Failure of sutures was observed in 2 out of 35 (5.7%) patients after standard gastric resection: one after resection of Hofmeister Finsterer and the other after resection for PY. Complications from the cardiovascular system were observed in 5 (14.3%) patients. After surgery, 5 (22.7%) patients died: 4 after resection of 2/3 of the stomach and 1 patient after pyloroduodenal resection with stem vagotomy. All the deceased were operated on urgently: 2 patients for perforation of giant ulcers and 3 patients for continuing profuse bleeding. The causes of death of patients operated on for bleeding were: myocardial infarction in 1 patient, pulmonary embolism in 2 patients. Another 2 patients with failure of duodenal stump sutures, operated on for perforation of giant ulcers, died from increasing cardiovascular insufficiency. The analysis of long-term results of surgical interventions showed a steady decrease in the number of post gastric resection and post-vagotomic disorders, as well as the absence of ulcer recurrence. It should be noted that the phenomena of dumping syndrome observed in patients after standard gastric resection were not severe and were corrected by a lax diet. After piloroduodenal resection with anastomosis by Billroth-I and stem vagotomy, manifestations of gastrostasis and diarrhea were stopped in the remote postoperative period. When assessing the quality of life, there were no unsatisfactory results, all previously operated patients led their usual lifestyle, maintained their working capacity, and did not require re-hospitalization.

Gastroduodenal perforation in the pediatric population: a retrospective analysis of 20 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the pathogenesis, symptoms and individualized surgical management in pediatrics with gastroduodenal perforation (GDP). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with GDP from January 2013 to December 2016 in our hospital were collected and divided into gastric perforation (GP) group and duodenal perforation (DP) group. Demographics, clinical events, etiological factors, symptoms, the time from symptom onset to operation, intraoperative findings and surgical procedures were analyzed. Follow-ups including ulcer, perforations occurrence, and digestive symptoms were carried out by out-patient review or telephones. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients aged from 3 months to 14 years were enrolled in this study. The average age, main clinical presentations, size of perforations and operating time between two groups had no difference. The male to female ratio in DP group was higher than GP (P < 0.05). The high risk factor for DP was the use of dexamethasone, and for GP was HP infection. The most common site of perforation in DP group was duodenal bulb, and in GP group was pylorus area. Simple suture is the main management for both DP and GP, but distal gastrectomy combined with gastrojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis may be an alternative procedure for large perforation with diameter > 2 cm. The length of hospital days in GP group is shorter than DP group (P < 0.05). For follow-up, no patients had digestive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The general condition had no difference between GP and DP patients. But the risk factors and surgical repair differ depending on the patient's fundamental illness and the complexity of the perforation.