Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 397
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 378(23): 2161-2170, 2018 06 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29874535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical management of early pregnancy loss is an alternative to uterine aspiration, but standard medical treatment with misoprostol commonly results in treatment failure. We compared the efficacy and safety of pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol with the efficacy and safety of misoprostol use alone for the management of early pregnancy loss. METHODS: We randomly assigned 300 women who had an anembryonic gestation or in whom embryonic or fetal death was confirmed to receive pretreatment with 200 mg of mifepristone, administered orally, followed by 800 µg of misoprostol, administered vaginally (mifepristone-pretreatment group), or 800 µg of misoprostol alone, administered vaginally (misoprostol-alone group). Participants returned 1 to 4 days after misoprostol use for evaluation, including ultrasound examination, by an investigator who was unaware of the treatment-group assignments. Women in whom the gestational sac was not expelled were offered expectant management, a second dose of misoprostol, or uterine aspiration. We followed all participants for 30 days after randomization. Our primary outcome was gestational sac expulsion with one dose of misoprostol by the first follow-up visit and no additional intervention within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: Complete expulsion after one dose of misoprostol occurred in 124 of 148 women (83.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8 to 89.3) in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 100 of 149 women (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 74.6) in the misoprostol-alone group (relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.43). Uterine aspiration was performed less frequently in the mifepristone-pretreatment group than in the misoprostol-alone group (8.8% vs. 23.5%; relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.68). Bleeding that resulted in blood transfusion occurred in 2.0% of the women in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 0.7% of the women in the misoprostol-alone group (P=0.31); pelvic infection was diagnosed in 1.3% of the women in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol resulted in a higher likelihood of successful management of first-trimester pregnancy loss than treatment with misoprostol alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; PreFaiR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02012491 .).


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Espontáneo/tratamiento farmacológico , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Abortivos no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Administración Intravaginal , Administración Oral , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Embrión de Mamíferos , Femenino , Muerte Fetal , Saco Gestacional/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía
2.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 26(2): 171-173, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615941

RESUMEN

In the second trimester, medical abortion is preferred as it is less invasive, and the surgical method carries more risk. There is a paucity of published literature on medical abortion in women with renal failure requiring haemodialysis. We came across a woman who presented with rapidly progressive renal failure at 18 weeks of gestation and required therapeutic abortion. We are reporting the challenges, outcomes, and precautions to be taken while performing a medical abortion in such a case.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Abortivos Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido , Nefritis Lúpica/complicaciones , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones , Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(1): 163.e1-163.e2, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477354

RESUMEN

Laminaria are cervical dilators inserted for several days preceding second-trimester abortions and other uterine procedures. Our patient was intubated after a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to laminaria prior to her surgical abortion. Abortions with laminaria dilators are frequently performed outpatient across the United States. Due to stigma, increasing restrictions, and forced closure of family planning clinics, these procedures are often obtained covertly and remotely. Patients may present obtunded, in shock, without records or proxy, and with no external evidence of the allergen's location or continued presence. Emergency and critical care physicians may consider this etiology in obtunded women with anaphylaxis who are responding poorly to standard care.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Dilatación/efectos adversos , Laminaria , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Cuello del Útero , Dilatación/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(5): 478.e1-478.e15, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763542

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By being noninvasive, medical termination of pregnancy has increased worldwide access to abortion and improved safety of unsafe abortion. However, secondary surgical intervention is the most frequent complication to medical abortion. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify and quantify risk factors for surgical intervention in women undergoing medically induced termination of pregnancy before 9 completed weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nationwide cohort study, including all pregnancies terminated before 63 gestational days in women aged 15-49 years during the period 2005-2015. Induction regimen was 200 mg mifepristone followed 24-48 hours later by 0.8 mg vaginal misoprostol. All included pregnancies were followed up for 8 weeks from mifepristone administration. Data were retrieved from national health registers. Multiple logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios of surgical intervention with 95% confidence intervals. The discriminative ability of the risk factors in identifying surgical intervention was assessed by cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of 86,437 early medical abortions, 5320 (6.2%) underwent a surgical intervention within 8 weeks after induction. The proportion of surgical interventions increased from 3.5% in the 5th to 6th gestational week to 10.3% in week 9, odds ratio, 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.9-3.6). Compared with women aged 15-19 years, the risk of surgical intervention increased with increasing maternal age until the age of 30-34 years, odds ratio, 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.9), where after the risk decreased to an odds ratio for age group 40-49 of 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.4). Compared with nulliparous women, a history of only vaginal deliveries with spontaneous delivery of placenta implied an odds ratio of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2), women with a history of at least 1 cesarean delivery, an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6), and women having experienced a manual removal of placenta after a vaginal birth, an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4). Previous medically induced abortion decreased the risk of surgical intervention, odds ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91), whereas previous early (before 56 days of gestation) surgically induced abortion implied a 53% (95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.7) increased risk of surgical intervention. Previous surgical abortion after 55 days of gestation increased the risk by 17% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model including all quantified risk factors was 63% (95% confidence interval, 62-64%). CONCLUSION: Gestational age, maternal age, previous deliveries, and history of medically and surgically induced abortions all had a significant influence on the risk of surgical intervention of early medical abortion. However, inclusion of all quantified risk factors still left most interventions unpredictable.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido , Legrado por Aspiración , Adolescente , Adulto , Cesárea , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Edad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 443, 2019 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy failure (EPF) is a common complication of pregnancy. If women do not abort spontaneously, they will undergo medical or surgical treatment in order to remove the products of conception from the uterus. Curettage, although highly effective, is associated with a risk of complications; medical treatment with misoprostol is a safe and less expensive alternative. Unfortunately, after 1 week of expectant management in case of EPF, medical treatment with misoprostol has a complete evacuation rate of approximately 50%. Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination. This study will test the hypothesis that, in EPF, the sequential combination of mifepristone with misoprostol is superior to the use of misoprostol alone in terms of complete evacuation (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs (secondary outcomes). METHODS: The trial will be performed multi-centred, prospectively, two-armed, randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Women with confirmed EPF by ultrasonography (6-14 weeks), managed expectantly for at least 1 week, can be included and randomised to pre-treatment with oral mifepristone (600 mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance). Randomisation will take place after receiving written consent to participate. In both arms pre-treatment will be followed by oral misoprostol, which will start 36-48 h later consisting of two doses 400 µg (4 hrs apart), repeated after 24 h if no tissue is lost. Four hundred sixty-four women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. Ultrasonography 2 weeks after treatment will determine short term treatment effect. When the gestational sac is expulsed, expectant management is advised until 6 weeks after treatment when the definitive primary endpoint, complete or incomplete evacuation, will be determined. A sonographic endometrial thickness < 15 mm using only the allocated therapy by randomisation is considered as successful treatment. Secondary outcome measures (patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs) will be registered using a case report form, patient diary and validated questionnaires (Short Form 36, EuroQol-VAS, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire). DISCUSSION: This trial will answer the question if, in case of EPF, after at least 1 week of expectant management, sequential treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone to achieve complete evacuation of the products of conception. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (d.d. 02-07-2017): NCT03212352. Trialregister.nl (d.d. 03-07-2017): NTR6550. EudraCT number (d.d. 07-08-2017): 2017-002694-19. File number Commisie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (d.d. 07-08-2017): NL 62449.091.17.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Abortivos Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Incompleto/tratamiento farmacológico , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Incompleto/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ultrasonografía , Espera Vigilante , Adulto Joven
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 39(5): 647-651, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30917727

RESUMEN

Our aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and complication rate of our inpatient medical management protocol for missed miscarriages. Three-hundred and ninety women hospitalised at our tertiary centre because of a missed miscarriage/anembryonic pregnancy in 2012-2013 were included in this retrospective study. The women underwent either a low (until 9 + 0 weeks of gestation) or high gestational age (from 9 + 1 until 15 + 6 weeks of gestation) management protocol. The success rate, curettage in the first 48 hours after the procedure, the complication rate and the factors that might influence these outcomes were evaluated. The overall success rate was 83.3%. The curettage in the first 48 hours after the procedure was performed in 7.4% of the patients and was more often in the high gestational age protocol. Complications that required another outpatient visit or hospitalisation occurred in 9% of the patients. Higher beta-hCG values 14 days after the procedure and the absence of evacuation of products of conception during hospitalisation were associated with a higher complication rate. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? As much as 10-20% of clinically recognised pregnancies end in a spontaneous abortion. A missed miscarriage and a blighted ovum represent a form of spontaneous abortion, which has long been treated with surgical evacuation. However, nowadays, medical management represents a well-established alternative with very high success rates and is considered as an equivalent and safe method that is also very well accepted by patients. What do the results of this study add? According to our results, a medical management of a first trimester missed miscarriage and a blighted ovum is very effective with an overall success rate of 83.3% and a very low percentage of curettage in the first 48 hours after the procedure (7.4%). Our study was also able to identify higher beta-hCG values 14 days after procedure and absence of evacuation of products of conception during hospitalisation as risk factors for complication occurrence. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our study helps to identify patients who are at greater risk for developing complications after the medical management of a first trimester missed miscarriage.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Retenido/tratamiento farmacológico , Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Retenido/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Gonadotropina Coriónica Humana de Subunidad beta/sangre , Legrado , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Uterina/cirugía , Adulto Joven
7.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 30(6): 394-399, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399015

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical abortion offers a well tolerated and effective method to terminate early pregnancy, but remains underutilized in the United States. Over the last decade, 'telemedicine' has been studied as an option for medical abortion to improve access when patients and providers are not together. A number of studies have explored various practice models and their feasibility as an alternative to in-person service provision. RECENT FINDINGS: A direct-to-clinic model of telemedicine medical abortion has similar efficacy with no increased risk of significant adverse events when compared with in-person abortion. A direct-to-consumer model is currently being studied in the United States. International models of direct-to-consumer medical abortion have shown promising results. SUMMARY: The introduction of telemedicine into abortion care has been met with early success. Currently, there are limitations to the reach of telemedicine because of specific restrictions on mifepristone in the United States as well as laws that specifically prohibit telemedicine for abortion. If these barriers are removed, telemedicine can potentially increase abortion access.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Telemedicina/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 12: CD012834, 2018 12 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566226

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for safe abortion recommend medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol or surgical abortion with vacuum aspiration or dilation and evacuation as safe and effective options for women. However, no specific clinical considerations are stipulated within these guidelines for women living with HIV. Concerns have been raised that women living with HIV may be at greater risk of adverse abortion outcomes compared to HIV-uninfected women due to immunosuppression, high rates of co-infection with other sexually transmitted infections, and possible contraindications between medications used for medical abortion and antiretroviral therapy regimens. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of medical versus surgical abortion among women living with HIV. Our secondary objectives were to: (1) compare outcomes of medical and surgical abortion between women living with HIV and women without HIV and (2) describe outcomes of medical and surgical abortion among women living with HIV. SEARCH METHODS: We conducted our search on 17 April 2018. We searched for all published and unpublished trials and observational studies of medical and surgical abortion among women living with HIV. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform using a combination of terms for abortion and HIV. We searched conference websites for relevant abstracts. We also sought unpublished data stratified by HIV status that could be newly analyzed. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and observational studies. We considered: (1) studies on the effectiveness and safety of medical versus surgical abortion among women living with HIV; (2) studies comparing outcomes of abortion for both methods between women living with HIV and women without HIV; and (3) studies that described outcomes of abortion among women living with HIV. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author screened the titles, abstracts, citation information, and descriptor terms for citations initially identified by the search. We obtained the full-text articles of all potentially eligible studies when these were available. Two review authors independently examined the full-text articles for compliance with the inclusion criteria and determination of final study selection. We planned to conduct meta-analysis if a sufficient number of studies (at least three) addressed the same research question and presented data on sufficiently comparable outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Of 3840 records screened, we identified just one conference abstract that met our inclusion criteria. This prospective cohort study assessed the efficacy and acceptability of home administration of misoprostol for early medical abortion among women living with HIV who were of less than 63 days amenorrhea in Ukraine. Medical abortion was effective in 65 of 68 cases (96%) examined. The small number of failures included incomplete abortion (n = 1), heavy bleeding (n = 1), and ongoing pregnancy (n = 1). There were no serious infections. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to the paucity of studies, we were unable to determine if outcome differences exist between women living with HIV and women without HIV who undergo medical or surgical abortion. We found no evidence suggesting that medical or surgical abortions are unsafe for women living with HIV. While additional research would strengthen the evidence base, healthcare providers should not be deterred from providing access to safe abortion to their patients living with HIV.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos , Abortivos Esteroideos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Sobrevivientes de VIH a Largo Plazo , Mifepristona , Misoprostol , Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Administración Sublingual , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 138(9)2018 05 29.
Artículo en Inglés, Nor | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808660

RESUMEN

BAKGRUNN: I Norge utføres abort kun i offentlige sykehus. I 2010 besluttet Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet å iverksette et toårig prøveprosjekt som ga avtalespesialister i fødselshjelp og kvinnesykdommer adgang til å tilby medikamentell abort før utgangen av 9. svangerskapsuke. Prøveprosjektet ble igangsatt 1.3.2015 og varte til 31.3.2017. I denne artikkelen presenterer vi de første erfaringene, herunder hvordan behandlingstilbudet ble mottatt av kvinnene. MATERIALE OG METODE: Gravide med en svangerskapsvarighet < 63 dager ultrasonografisk vurdert, som oppsøkte avtalespesialist for medikamentell abort, ble fortløpende inkludert i prosjektet (n = 476). Kvinnene inntok 200 mg mifepriston peroralt på legekontoret, 36-48 timer senere satte de selv 800 µg misoprostol vaginalt hjemme. Informasjon ble innhentet ved spørreskjema på den første konsultasjonen, under aborten og ved etterkontrollen 2-4 uker etter aborten. RESULTATER: Under aborten rapporterte 66 % (296/450) moderat eller sterk smerte og 79 % (358/451) moderat eller sterk blødning. De fleste opplevde det som trygt å være hjemme. 96 % (390/406) ville valgt medikamentell abort hos avtalespesialist ved en eventuell senere abort, og 97 % (392/405) ville anbefalt behandlingstilbudet til andre i samme situasjon. FORTOLKNING: Kvinnene i studien opplevde abortbehandling hos avtalespesialist som trygt. Tilbudet gir større valgfrihet til gravide som ønsker abort, og pasientene er tilfredse.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Práctica Privada , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Noruega , Dolor/etiología , Paridad , Seguridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Autoadministración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología , Adulto Joven
10.
BJOG ; 124(11): 1646-1652, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28317327

RESUMEN

Given the overall safety profile and increasing availability of medical pregnancy termination drugs, we asked: would the mifepristone-misoprostol regimen for medical termination at ≤10 weeks of gestation meet US Food and Drug Administration regulatory criteria for over-the-counter (OTC) approval, and if not, what are the present research gaps? We conducted a literature review of consumer behaviours necessary for a successful OTC application for medical termination at ≤10 weeks of gestation and identified crucial research gaps. If we were to embark on a development programme for OTC or more generally, self-use of medical termination, the critical elements missing are the label comprehension, self-selection and actual use studies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Considering medical pregnancy termination through the over-the-counter regulatory lens clarifies critical evidence gaps.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/ética , Aprobación de Drogas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
11.
BJOG ; 124(13): 2001-2008, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28421651

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of women in Scotland who return home to complete medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) ≤63 days of gestation, after being administered with mifepristone and misoprostol at an NHS TOP clinic. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: One National Health Service health board (administrative) area in Scotland. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Women in Scotland who had undergone medical TOP ≤63 days, and self-managed passing the pregnancy at home; recruited from three clinics in one NHS health board area between January and July 2014. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 44 women in Scotland who had recently undergone TOP ≤63 days of gestation, and who returned home to pass the pregnancy. Data were analysed thematically using an approach informed by the Framework method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's experiences of self-management of TOP ≤63 days of gestation. RESULTS: Key themes emerging from the analysis related to self-administration of misoprostol in clinic; reasons for choosing home self-management; facilitation of self-management and expectation-setting; experiences of getting home; self-managing and monitoring treatment progress; support for self-management (in person and remotely); and pregnancy self-testing to confirm completion. CONCLUSIONS: Participants primarily found self-administration of misoprostol and home self-management to be acceptable and/or preferable, particularly where this was experienced as a decision made jointly with health professionals. The way in which home self-management is presented to women at clinic requires ongoing attention. Women could benefit from the option of home administration of misoprostol. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women undergoing medical TOP 63 days found home self-management to be acceptable and/or preferable.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Manejo del Dolor , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Escocia , Autoadministración , Automanejo/psicología , Adulto Joven
12.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(6): 413-418, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28922193

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature on second trimester abortion with medical methods. RECENT FINDINGS: Across studies published in the recent past, it is apparent that women prefer shorter procedures and procedure times. Several randomized controlled trials have confirmed adding mifepristone to the second trimester medication abortion regimen results in shorter abortion intervals from first misoprostol administration to complete fetal expulsion. A study of simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol yielded shorter mean 'total' abortion times, presenting several logistical advantages. Recent studies on the continuous dosing of misoprostol have produced critical evidence to support continued dosing until expulsion. These studies had a more practical design compared with previous protocols that capped the number of misoprostol doses. SUMMARY: Second trimester surgical abortion is well tolerated and increasingly expeditious. Further research is needed to refine second trimester medical abortion methods, specific to the mifepristone, misoprostol dosing interval. A 12-hour mifepristone to misoprostol interval may be the optimal interval balancing patient preferences and logistical considerations. Pragmatic dosing, including continuous dosing of misoprostol, could yield results that better inform clinical guidelines and reduce burden on patient, provider, and health facility.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
13.
Reprod Health ; 14(1): 39, 2017 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28288649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Australian Government approval in 2012 for the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) allows general practitioners (GPs) to provide early gestation abortion in primary care settings. However, uptake of the MTOP provision by GPs appears to be low and the reasons for this have been unclear. This study investigated the provision of and referral for MTOP by GPs. METHODS: We undertook descriptive-interpretive qualitative research and selected participants for diversity using a matrix. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group (N = 4), were conducted with 32 GPs (8 MTOP providers, 24 non MTOP providers) in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework to examine access to abortion services was used to develop the interview questions and emergent themes identified thematically. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: scope of practice; MTOP demand, care and referral; and workforce needs. Many GPs saw abortion as beyond the scope of their practice (i.e. a service others provide in specialist private clinics). Some GPs had religious or moral objections; others regarded MTOP provision as complicated and difficult. While some GPs expressed interest in MTOP provision they were concerned about stigma and the impact it may have on perceptions of their practice and the views of colleagues. Despite a reported variance in demand most MTOP providers were busy but felt isolated. Difficulties in referral to a local public hospital in the case of complications or the provision of surgical abortion were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring the factors which affect access to MTOP in general practice settings provides insights to assist the future planning and delivery of reproductive health services. This research identifies the need for support to increase the number of MTOP GP providers and for GPs who are currently providing MTOP. Alongside these actions provision in the public sector is required. In addition, formalised referral pathways to the public sector are required to ensure timely care in the case of complications or the provision of surgical options. Leadership and coordination across the health sector is needed to facilitate integrated abortion care particularly for rural and low income women.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Médicos Generales/psicología , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Australia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
15.
Ceska Gynekol ; 82(5): 1-8, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020779

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In the Czech Republic (CR), it is possible, to carry out Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MToP) in the 1st trimester since June 2014, in case a woman submits a written request for it and in case the ultrasound examination confirms an intrauterine singleton prosperous pregnancy, between day 42 and 49 of gestation, crown-rump length (CRL) of the embryo 2-9 mm. The aim of the study is to analyze the management of MToP up until the 7th week of gestation in five centres in the CR. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort (prospective) study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc; The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University in Prague, Third faculty of Medicine; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University in Prague, First faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University in Prague, First faculty of Medicine, Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno. METHODS: In 2014-2016, a total of 1820 pregnant women requested MToP. The diagnosis of an intrauterine singleton prosperous pregnancy was set by transvaginal ultrasound, CRL 2-9 mm. MToP was carried out by combination of mifepristone (600 mg orally) and misoprostol (400 mcg orally) within 48 hours. MToP follow up (exclusion of ongoing pregnancy) after 2-3 weeks was carried out by transvaginal ultrasound as well. RESULTS: In 11.0% of women (201/1820) who requested MToP, CRL > 9 mm, unprosperous, multiple or ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed. In the remaining 1619 women MToP was carried out, but in 221 cases (13.7%) at least one additional pre-first visit was needed before the diagnosis of intrauterine singleton prosperous pregnancy CRL 2-9 mm could be established, in 19 cases (1.2%) two pre-first visits and in 5 cases (0.3%) even three. Gestational age was 42-49 days (average 47.1, median 47), the women were 14-47 years of age (average 30.7, median 30). In 20.8% of women (336/1619) MToP follow up was missed and of the remaining 1283 women, ongoing pregnancy (MToP failure) was diagnosed in 1.6% (24/1283), incomplete abortion in 6.5% (83/1283) and complete abortion in 91.9% (1179/1283). A subsequent surgical intervention was carried out in 7.1 % of women (91/1283). CONCLUSION: A medical facility performing MToP in the 1st trimester should develop its own methodology in accordance with the legislation in force, Summaries of Product Characteristics, and recommendations of professional associations. The methodology should also include a method of evaluation of the result and management. The subsequent surgical intervention should only be performed in indicated cases. The main goal of MToP follow up is to exclude ongoing pregnancy (MToP failure), and the patient should be informed in detail about the risks involved and possibilities of their solution, it is necessary to obtain an informed consent.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/farmacología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Niño , República Checa , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mifepristona/farmacología , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
Small ; 12(19): 2595-608, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27027489

RESUMEN

The circulating tumor cells (CTCs) existing in cancer survivors are considered the root cause of cancer metastasis. To prevent the devastating metastasis cascade from initiation, we hypothesize that a biodegradable nanomaterial loaded with the abortifacient mifepristone (MIF) and conjugated with the epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibody (aEpCAM) may serve as a safe and effective cancer metastatic preventive agent by targeting CTCs and preventing their adhesion-invasion to vascular intima. It is demonstrated that MIF-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) coated with aEpCAM (aE-MSN-M) can specifically target and bind colorectal cancer cells in either cell medium or blood through EpCAM recognition proven by quantitative flow cytometric detection and free aEpCAM competitive assay. The specific binding results in downregulation of the captured cells and drives them into G0/G1 phase primarily attributed to the effect of aEpCAM. The functional nanoparticles significantly inhibit the heteroadhesion between cancer cells and endothelial cells, suggesting the combined inhibition effects of aEpCAM and MIF on E-selectin and ICAM-1 expression. The functionalized nanoparticles circulate in mouse blood long enough to deliver MIF and inhibit lung metastasis. The present proof-of-concept study shows that the aE-MSN-M can prevent cancer metastasis by restraining CTC activity and their adhesion-invasion to vascular intima.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/secundario , Molécula de Adhesión Celular Epitelial/inmunología , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Nanocápsulas/química , Dióxido de Silicio/química , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/química , Absorción Fisicoquímica , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/inmunología , Difusión , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Células HT29 , Humanos , Ratones , Mifepristona/química , Nanocápsulas/ultraestructura , Nanoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Nanoconjugados/química , Nanoporos/ultraestructura , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Reprod Health Matters ; 24(48): 90-101, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28024683

RESUMEN

Evidence suggests that there is widespread home use of abortion pills in Ireland and that ending a pregnancy in this way is potentially safer than the alternatives available to many women. This paper argues that there is a strong case for women with unwanted pregnancies to be offered truthful and objective information regarding the use of abortion pills by trusted local professionals and, further, that this is possible within existing law. A move in this direction would not, however, negate the need for legal reform to address the fundamental moral incoherence of a law that treats women who terminate pregnancies within Ireland as criminals but those who travel to access services overseas as victims in need of support. In support of these arguments, the paper draws on both library research and a small number of interviews with government officials, service providers and activists.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Criminal , Aborto Inducido , Anticoncepción Postcoital , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Criminal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Criminal/psicología , Aborto Inducido/ética , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Administración Oral , Anticoncepción Postcoital/ética , Anticoncepción Postcoital/métodos , Deglución , Ética Médica , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Irlanda , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Política , Embarazo , Embarazo no Deseado , Religión y Medicina , Telemedicina
18.
Toxicol Mech Methods ; 26(1): 36-45, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26907462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mifepristone (RU486) is an oral first-line contraceptive used by hundreds of millions of women, and recently it was tested for anticancer activity in both genders worldwide. We are developing metapristone (the N-monodemethyl RU486) as a potential metastasis chemopreventive. The present acute and 30-d subacute toxicity study aimed at examining and compared in parallel the potential toxicity of the two drugs. METHODS: The single-dose acute toxicity and 30-d subacute toxicity studies were conducted in mice and rats, respectively, by gavaging metapristone or mifepristone at various doses. Blood samples and organs were collected for blood chemistry, hematology and histology analyses. RESULTS: Oral mifepristone (3000 mg/kg) caused 30% and 40% death in female and male mice, respectively, within 15 h post-dosing. In comparison, the same dose of metapristone produced 30% acute death in males only. Thirty-day oral administration of the two drugs to rats (12.5, 50 and 200 mg/kg/day) caused reversible hepatotoxicity that only occurred at 200 mg/kg/day group, evidenced by the elevated liver enzyme activity and liver organ weight. CONCLUSION: The present study, for the first time, reveals reversible hepatotoxicity in rats caused by the 30-d consecutive administration at the high dose, and warns the potential hepatotoxicity caused by long-term administrations of high doses of mifepristone or metapristone in clinical trials but not by the acute single abortion doses.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/toxicidad , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/patología , Mifepristona/análogos & derivados , Mifepristona/toxicidad , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Ratas
19.
Issues Law Med ; 31(1): 3-27, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27323546

RESUMEN

Decades after Roe, debate over abortion remains as contentious as ever. States continue to pass regulations burdening the abortion right, but lack clear guidance on how to evaluate such regulations using the undue burden test. This Article chronicles Supreme Court jurisprudence on abortion and examines how the current circuit split surrounding FDA-protocol legislation fits within the larger framework. Finally, this Article applies the proper version of the undue burden test to FDA-protocol legislation, which resolves the circuit split and provides lower courts with a clear means of analyzing abortion issues moving forward.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aborto Legal/métodos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
20.
Reprod Health Matters ; 22(44 Suppl 1): 56-66, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25702069

RESUMEN

In Armenia, abortion is the main means of fertility regulation; however, before research activities were initiated only surgical methods were available and the quality of services was low in some areas. Our clinical study from 2008-2011 aimed to show that early medical abortion is an acceptable and feasible option. A total of 700 eligible women with pregnancies up to 63 days LMP presenting for abortion were recruited for the study in five locations. Participants took 200 mg mifepristone and 800 µg buccal misoprostol 24-48 hours later. They returned for a follow-up visit two weeks after mifepristone administration. 95% of the women had successful abortions and 95% were satisfied with the method. In 2012-2013, we conducted a follow-up assessment to examine the ongoing provision and quality of medical abortion services at the former research sites. Medical record reviews, interviews and observations were carried out three times approximately six months apart. The assessment found that all five sites had continued providing medical abortion, with about half of eligible women choosing the medical method. Four of the five sites were achieving high success rates. Staff turnover and the lack of trained providers likely contributed to the higher failure rate at the fifth site. These findings provide evidence that first trimester medical abortion is an acceptable and feasible option for Armenian women and providers, and that high quality services are being delivered.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Armenia , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA