Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.264
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 295: 746-752, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147760

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: One of the significant complications of operative liver trauma is intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA). The objective of this study was to determine risk factors associated with postoperative IAA in surgical patients with major operative liver trauma. METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional study was performed at 13 Level 1 and Level 2 trauma centers from 2012 to 2021. Adult patients with major liver trauma (grade 3 and higher) requiring operative management were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-two patients were included with 21.2% (n = 79/372) developing an IAA. No difference was found for age, gender, injury severity score, liver injury grade, and liver resections in patients between the groups (P > 0.05). Penetrating mechanism of injury (odds ratio (OR) 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-7.57, P = 0.02), intraoperative massive transfusion protocol (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.23-4.79, P = 0.01), biloma/bile leak (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.01-4.53, P = 0.04), hospital length of stay (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001), and additional intra-abdominal injuries (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.09-4.72, P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for IAA. Intra-abdominal drains, damage control laparotomy, total units of packed red blood cells, number of days with an open abdomen, total abdominal surgeries, and blood loss during surgery were not found to be associated with a higher risk of IAA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with penetrating trauma, massive transfusion protocol activation, longer hospital length of stay, and injuries to other intra-abdominal organs were at higher risk for the development of an IAA following operative liver trauma. Results from this study could help to refine existing guidelines for managing complex operative traumatic liver injuries.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Cavidad Abdominal , Traumatismos Abdominales , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hígado/cirugía , Hígado/lesiones , Abdomen , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos
2.
J Surg Res ; 295: 655-659, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103323

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative (postop) management of pediatric perforated appendicitis varies significantly, and postop intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA) remain a significant issue. Between 2019 and 2020, our standardized protocol included routine postop labs after an appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. However, given the lack of predictive utility of these routine labs, we discontinued this practice in 2021. We hypothesize that discontinuing routine postop labs will not be associated with an increase in complication rates after an appendectomy for pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective review of all pediatric appendectomies for perforated appendicitis from January 2019 to December 2021 was conducted at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. Data were collected on rate of complications (IAA development, re-admissions, bowel obstructions, superficial surgical site infections, intensive care unit transfers, Clostridium difficile infections, allergic reactions, and transfusions), postop imaging, postop interventions, and length of stay. Statistical analysis was completed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (2019-2020 n = 61, 2021 n = 48) were included in the study. All 61 patients from 2019 to 2020 had postop labs compared to only eight patients in 2021. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in overall complication rates, but there was a decrease in IAAs reported in 2021 (P = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in other complications, postop imaging usage, or postop interventions. The median length of stay was 4.5 d in 2021 compared to 6.0 d in 2019-2020 (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing routine postop labs is not associated with an increase in overall complications rates. Further studies are needed to determine whether routine postop labs can be safely removed in pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis, which would reduce patient discomfort and care costs.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Humanos , Niño , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación
3.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3571-3577, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750172

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perforated appendicitis is associated with postoperative development of intraperitoneal abscess. Intraperitoneal drain placement during appendectomy is thought to reduce the risk of developing postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraperitoneal drainage could reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients (aged 7 and above) who were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2018 and December 2022 at two government hospitals in the state of Kuwait. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative complications, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and postoperative percutaneous drainage. RESULTS: A total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022. Of these, 307 (60.1%) underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement. Patients with and without drains were similar regarding age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (Table 1). The overall rate of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess was 6.1%. Postoperatively, there was no difference in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess formation between patients who underwent intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not (6.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.707). Patients with intraperitoneal drains had a longer LOS (4 [4, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5] days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall complication (18.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.065), superficial SSI (2.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.791) or readmission rate (4.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.835). CONCLUSIONS: Following laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, intraperitoneal drain placement appears to confer no additional benefit and may prolong hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Drenaje , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Apendicitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Absceso Abdominal/prevención & control , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Niño , Adulto Joven
4.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3180-3194, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This multicentre case-control study aimed to identify risk factors associated with non-operative treatment failure for patients with CT scan Hinchey Ib-IIb and WSES Ib-IIa diverticular abscesses. METHODS: This study included a cohort of adult patients experiencing their first episode of CT-diagnosed diverticular abscess, all of whom underwent initial non-operative treatment comprising either antibiotics alone or in combination with percutaneous drainage. The cohort was stratified based on the outcome of non-operative treatment, specifically identifying those who required emergency surgical intervention as cases of treatment failure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors associated with the failure of non-operative treatment was employed. RESULTS: Failure of conservative treatment occurred for 116 patients (27.04%). CT scan Hinchey classification IIb (aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.61;4.01, P < 0.01), tobacco smoking (aOR 2.01, 95%CI 1.24;3.25, P < 0.01), and presence of air bubbles inside the abscess (aOR 1.59, 95%CI 1.00;2.52, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of failure. In the subgroup of patients with abscesses > 5 cm, percutaneous drainage was not associated with the risk of failure or success of the non-operative treatment (aOR 2.78, 95%CI - 0.66;3.70, P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative treatment is generally effective for diverticular abscesses. Tobacco smoking's role as an independent risk factor for treatment failure underscores the need for targeted behavioural interventions in diverticular disease management. IIb Hinchey diverticulitis patients, particularly young smokers, require vigilant monitoring due to increased risks of treatment failure and septic progression. Further research into the efficacy of image-guided percutaneous drainage should involve randomized, multicentre studies focussing on homogeneous patient groups.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Drenaje , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Drenaje/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diverticulitis del Colon/terapia , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Absceso Abdominal/terapia , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Absceso/terapia , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos
5.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 180, 2024 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850459

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the most appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment to minimize the incidence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections in patients with complicated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, which included 396 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between January 2010 and December 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen, patients were classified into two groups based on the duration of their postoperative antibiotic intake: ≤ 3 postoperative days (group 1) vs. ≥ 4 postoperative days (group 2). The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections were compared between the groups. Additionally, multivariate risk factor analysis for the occurrence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections was performed. RESULTS: The two groups contained 226 and 170 patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (2% vs. 3%, p = 0.507) and wound infections (3% vs. 6%, p = 0.080) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that an additional cecum resection (OR 5.5 (95% CI 1.4-21.5), p = 0.014) was an independent risk factor for intraabdominal abscesses. A higher BMI (OR 5.9 (95% CI 1.2-29.2), p = 0.030) and conversion to an open procedure (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.4-20.0), p = 0.016) were identified as independent risk factors for wound infections. CONCLUSION: The duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy does not appear to influence the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections. Therefore, short-term postoperative antibiotic treatment should be preferred.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Antibacterianos , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Absceso Abdominal/prevención & control , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
6.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14613, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38158647

RESUMEN

There is much controversy about the application of abdominal irrigation in the prevention of wound infection (WI) and intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) in the postoperative period. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the effect of suctioning and lavage on appendectomy to assess the efficacy of either suctioning or lavage. Data were collected and estimated with RevMan 5.3 software. Based on our research, we found 563 publications in our database, and we eventually chose seven of them to analyse. The main results were IAA after the operation and WI. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials of an appendectomy with suctioning or lavage. In the end, seven trials were chosen to meet the eligibility criteria, and the majority were retrospective. The results of seven studies showed that there was no statistically significant difference between abdominal lavage and suctioning treatment for post-operative WI (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.40, 2.61; p = 0.96); There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the risk of postoperative abdominal abscess after operation (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.89; p = 0.56). No evidence has been found that the use of abdominal lavage in the treatment of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy is superior to aspiration.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Succión/efectos adversos , Succión/métodos , Irrigación Terapéutica , Apendicitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/prevención & control , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/métodos
7.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (5): 14-20, 2024.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785234

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the possibilities of minimally invasive methods for removing intra-abdominal calculi after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 5 patients with abdominal abscesses associated with infected calculi after previous laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care between 2020 and 2023. Mean age of patients was 55±12 years. There were 3 (60%) women and 2 (40%) men. All patients underwent minimally invasive treatment. RESULTS: Four patients (80%) underwent percutaneous drainage of abscess with subsequent replacement by larger drains and removal of calculi with endoscopic assistance. Event-free period after cholecystectomy was 44±32 months. One patient developed subhepatic abscess in 72 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This patient underwent transluminal removal of calculus through the duodenal wall. There was 1 calculus in 3 (60%) patients, 2 calculi in 1 (20%) patient and 3 calculi in 1 (20%) patient. CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned cases demonstrate successful minimally invasive interventions for symptomatic abdominal calculi after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimally invasive treatment can reduce surgical aggression and accelerate rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Masculino , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Drenaje/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(8): 5063-5070, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36808588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) are considered inevitable in some patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and measures to minimize their clinical impact are needed. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) and intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) are the most severe POPF-related complications, and concomitant leakage of contaminated intestinal content is considered the main cause. An innovative method, modified non-duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (TPJ), was created to prevent concomitant leakage of intestinal content, and its effectiveness was compared between two periods. METHODS: All PD patients undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy from 2012 to 2021 were included. The TPJ group consisted of 529 patients recruited from January 2018 to December 2021. A total of 535 patients receiving the conventional method (CPJ) from January 2012 to June 2017 were used as a control group. PPH and POPF were defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition, but only PPH grade C was included for analysis. An IAA was defined as a collection of postoperative fluid managed by CT-guided drainage with documental culture. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of POPF between the two groups (46.0% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.700). Furthermore, the percentages of bile in the drainage fluid in the TPJ and CPJ groups were 2.3% and 9.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Lower proportions of PPH (0.9% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.001) and IAA (5.7% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001) were observed for TPJ than for CPJ. On adjusted models, TPJ was significantly associated with a lower rate of PPH (odds ratio [OR] 0.132, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.051-0.343; p < 0.001) and IAA (OR 0.514, 95% CI 0.349-0.758; p = 0.001) than CPJ. CONCLUSIONS: TPJ is feasible to be performed and is associated with a similar rate of POPF but a lower percentage of concomitant bile in the drainage fluid and subsequent rates of PPH and IAA than CPJ.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Pancreatoyeyunostomía , Humanos , Pancreatoyeyunostomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatoyeyunostomía/métodos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/prevención & control , Membrana Mucosa/cirugía , Hemorragia , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
9.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 587-591, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed emergency procedures, with approximately 600,000 patients undergoing the procedure every year in the United States. Although LC is associated with fewer complications when compared with open cholecystectomy, the risk for infectious complications, including surgical site infection and intra-abdominal abscess, remains a significant source of postoperative morbidity. The goal of this study is to determine whether the gallbladder retrieval technique during LC affects risk of infectious complications. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted a retrospective comparative study in a minimally invasive surgery high-volume center in Bogota, Colombia. Patients who underwent LC in 2018 to 2020 were identified. The patients were divided into three groups. One group of LC performed using home-made gallbladder retrieval bag (HMGRB), and another group of LC performed using commercial gallbladder retrieval bag (CGRB). The primary outcomes were infectious complications of superficial site infection and intra-abdominal abscess. RESULTS: A total of 68 (7.58%) patients underwent LC using an HMGRB, and 828 (92.41%) using a CGRB. There was no significant difference in preoperative sepsis, or sex distribution between patient groups. Using t test, we found differences on age distribution among groups (p < 0.01), surgical times (p < 0.01), and length of stay (p = 0.01). When using Chi square, we found differences in Tokyo and Parkland Grading Scale severity (p < 0.01), use of postoperative antibiotics (p < 0.01), and drain use (p < 0.01). Nonetheless, there was no difference in the rate of superficial surgical site infection (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: HMGRB are not associated with increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess or superficial surgical site infection in comparison with CGRB but imply longer surgical times and length of stay. The use of HMGRB is safe, feasible, and has lower cost during LC.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Humanos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Vesícula Biliar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Tiempo de Internación
10.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 729-740, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36307601

RESUMEN

AIMS: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most performed procedures. The effects of peritoneal lavage (PL) and the reasons to perform it have not been cleared and all meta-analyses didn't show a statistical advantage to prevent infectious complications. This study aims to investigate surgeons' perceptions during LA, comparing intraoperative findings with histological results, and exploring how surgeons' subjectivity influences the decision-making process on PL. METHODS: Data were extracted from the two-year data lock from REsiDENT-1 registry, a prospective resident-led multicentre observational trial. This study investigates the relationships between PL and postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (pIAA) introducing a classification for AA to standardize the intraoperative grading. We included pre, intra, and postoperative variables. We applied our classification proposal, used a five-point Likert scale (Ls) to assess subjective LA difficulty and ran a concordance analysis between the assessment of AA and histology. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression model was built to find factors influencing PL. RESULTS: 561 patients were enrolled from twenty-one hospitals and 51 residents. 542 procedures were included in the logistic regression analysis and 441 in the concordance analysis, due to missing data. PL was used in 222 LA (39, 6%). We discovered a moderate positive monotonic relationship between surgical evaluation and histology, p < 0.001. Despite this, the reliability of the surgeon's assessment of appendicitis is progressively lower for gangrenous and perforated forms. The increasing grade of contamination, the increasing grade of subjective difficulty and the intraoperative finding of a gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were independent predictors of PL. CONCLUSION: This study shows how surgeons' evaluation of AA severity overestimated more than half of gangrenous or perforated appendices with the perception of a challenging procedure. These perceptions influenced the choice of PL. We proved that the evaluation during LA could be affected by subjectivity with a non-negligible impact on the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Cirujanos , Humanos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Lavado Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Gangrena/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Surg Endosc ; 37(2): 1123-1131, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36131159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Further data are necessary to evaluate the risk of complications associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively. This study aimed to determine the correlation between the use of NSAIDs in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted. The study population comprised 2150 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer treatment. They were divided into two groups: non-NSAIDs (n = 1215) and NSAIDs (n = 935) according to their use of the drugs. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days, risk factors for complications, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 2150 patients, 935 (43.49%) used NSAIDs. The overall complication rate showed no significant difference between the NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (22.7% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.280), while the rates of anastomotic leakage and duodenal leakage were higher in the NSAID group (2.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.002 and 1.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.007, respectively). The rates of intra-abdominal bleeding and intra-abdominal abscess were significantly higher in the NSAID group (2.1% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.005 and 1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.008, respectively). However, postoperative ileus occurred more frequently in the non-NSAID group (3.0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, NSAID use was an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications (1.303 [1.042-1.629], p = 0.020). Meanwhile, the NSAID group showed no differences in overall survival at each pathological stage. CONCLUSION: Postoperative NSAID use by IV-PCA is associated with anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, intra-abdominal bleeding, and intra-abdominal abscess in patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Caution is advised when NSAIDs are used peri-operatively.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Absceso Abdominal/etiología
12.
Surg Endosc ; 37(3): 1694-1699, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36203108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with complicated appendicitis are more at risk for the occurrence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses than patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy showed limitations and contradictory findings on the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses after appendicitis, as most of these studies analysed both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis as one group. The aim of the present study is to investigate the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed over the period January 2009 till May 2020. All patients who had an intra-operative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis (e.g. perforation, necrosis) were included. The outcome measure was the occurrence of intra-abdominal abscesses with a postoperative follow-up of 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed including adjustments for significant confounders. RESULTS: A total of 900 patients had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The majority was operated laparoscopically (78%, n = 705). The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was 12.3% in both laparoscopic and open appendectomy groups. On univariable analysis, the postoperative rates of intra-abdominal abscesses between laparoscopic and open appendectomy were not significantly different (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI [0.67-1.84], p = 0.681). CONCLUSION: The present study provides evidence that, in current daily practice, intra-abdominal abscess formation remains a common postoperative complication for complicated appendicitis. Nonetheless, no significant difference was found with regard to intra-abdominal abscess formation when comparing laparoscopy with open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación
13.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(3): 877-888, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790702

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complications, including abscesses and phlegmon, represent a high-risk Crohn's Disease phenotype. Anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-α (Anti-TNF) therapies are effective in treating penetrating Crohn's Disease and early initiation has shown unique benefits. However, timing of anti-TNF initiation in the setting of internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complications is typically heterogenous due to concern over precipitating serious infections. Recent studies demonstrate such an association may not exist. AIMS: We aimed to describe the multidisciplinary management of pediatric patients with internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complications, focusing on the utilization and timing of anti-TNF therapy relative to complication resolution and adverse events. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complications from 2007 to 2021. The safety and effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy initiation prior to complication resolution was assessed by comparing rates of infectious and Crohn's Disease-related adverse events between those who received anti-TNF therapy prior to complication resolution, versus those who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complications were identified. 7/21 received anti-TNF therapy prior to complication resolution. Infectious adverse events within 90 days of complication occurred in 0/7 patients initiating anti-TNF therapy prior to complication resolution and 10/14 patients who did not (p = 0.004). Crohn's Disease-related surgeries and hospitalizations within 1 year of complication occurred in 12/20 patients, with similar frequency between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating anti-TNF therapy prior to internally penetrating Crohn's Disease complication resolution may be a safe and effective strategy to improve clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Enfermedad de Crohn , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Celulitis (Flemón)/tratamiento farmacológico , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/complicaciones , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Necrosis
14.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 307(1): 139-148, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036826

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognosis of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) and identify risk factors for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 98 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for TOA at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Bern University Hospital from January 2011 to May 2021. The primary outcome studied was the recurrence of PID after TOA surgery. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, and surgical outcomes were examined as possible risk factors for PID recurrence. RESULTS: Out of the 98 patients included in the study, 21 (21.4%) presented at least one PID recurrence after surgery. In the univariate regression analysis, the presence of endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and the isolation of E. coli in the microbiology cultures correlated with PID recurrence. However, only endometriosis was identified as an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR (95% CI): 9.62 (1.931, 47.924), p < 0.01). With regard to the time of recurrence after surgery, two distinct recurrence clusters were observed. All patients with early recurrence (≤ 45 days after TOA surgery) were cured after 1 or 2 additional interventions, whereas 40% of the patients with late recurrence (> 45 days after TOA surgery) required 3 or more additional interventions until cured. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis is a significant risk factor for PID recurrence after TOA surgery. Optimized therapeutic strategies such as closer postsurgical follow-up as well as longer antibiotic and hormonal therapy should be assessed in further studies in this specific patient population.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Endometriosis , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas , Enfermedades del Ovario , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica , Salpingitis , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/cirugía , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/cirugía , Absceso/cirugía , Absceso/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escherichia coli , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Salpingitis/complicaciones , Salpingitis/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades del Ovario/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía
15.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 171, 2023 Apr 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37031267

RESUMEN

Children undergoing appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis are at an increased risk of post-operative morbidity. Placement of an intra-peritoneal drain to prevent post-operative complications is controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic drain placement to prevent complications in children with complicated appendicitis. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 2022 for studies directly comparing drain placement to no drain placement in children ≤ 18 years of age undergoing operative treatment of complicated appendicitis. A total of 5108 children with complicated appendicitis were included from 16 studies; 2231 (44%) received a drain. Placement of a drain associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-peritoneal abscess formation (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.24, p = 0.004) but there was no significant difference in wound infection rate (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.74-2.88, p = 0.28). Length of stay was significantly longer in the drain group (mean difference 2.02 days, 95% CI 1.14-2.90, p < 0.001). Although the quality and certainty of the available evidence is low, prophylactic drain placement does not prevent intra-peritoneal abscess following appendicectomy in children with complicated appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Peritonitis , Humanos , Niño , Absceso/cirugía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/prevención & control , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Peritonitis/cirugía , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos
16.
Int Wound J ; 20(8): 3048-3056, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37165758

RESUMEN

A meta-analysis study to measure the consequence of endoscopic loop ties (ELT) in acute appendicitis (AA) on wound infection rate. A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 2765 interrelated studies were reviewed. The 27 chosen studies enclosed 15 093 subjects with AA in the chosen studies' starting point, 7141 of them were ELT, and 7952 were open surgery. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the effect of ELT in AA on wound infection rate by the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Open surgery had a significantly higher postoperative surgical site wound infection (SSWI). (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.83, P = 0.009) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 34%) compared to ELT in AA subjects. Although no significant difference was detected between open surgery and ELT in intra-abdominal abscess rate (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.56-1.40, P = 0.59) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 51%) in AA subjects. Open surgery had a significantly higher postoperative SSWI, however, no significant difference was found in intra-abdominal abscess rate compared to ELT in AA subjects. However, caused by the small sample sizes of several chosen studies for this meta-analysis, care must be exercised when dealing with its values.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Apendicitis , Humanos , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía
17.
Rozhl Chir ; 102(1): 37-41, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809894

RESUMEN

Retroperitoneal abscess after abdominal and retroperitoneal surgery is a relatively rare but serious complication that most often occurs as a result of a healing disorder in the postoperative period. The incidence is not high, in the literature the cases are mostly reported as case reports with a serious clinical course, high morbidity and mortality. The most important factor of effective treatment, after successful diagnosis by CT examination is rapid evacuation of the abscess and retroperitoneal drainage, in which mini-invasive surgical or radiological drainage dominate as methods of choice. Surgical drainage, burdened by higher morbidity and mortality is considered the last resort after failure of mini-invasive methods. In our case report, we present a case of retroperitoneal abscess, arising as a complication after gastric resection, which was evacuated and drained primarily surgically due to unsuitability for radiological intervention.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Enfermedades Peritoneales , Humanos , Anciano , Absceso , Absceso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Estómago
18.
J Surg Res ; 270: 76-84, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the liver being one of the most frequently injured abdominal organs in trauma patients, clinical management strategies differ between trauma surgeons. Few studies have critically evaluated current practice patterns in the operative management of liver trauma. Historical studies recommended against the use of drains but there has not been a modern investigation of this issue. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes associated with intra-operative drain use for liver trauma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all adult trauma patients presenting to a Level I trauma center from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Patients who underwent operative management of liver trauma were divided into groups based on whether an intra-abdominal drain was utilized and differences in outcomes between the groups were analyzed. The primary endpoint evaluated was post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 184 patients with operative management of liver trauma were included in the study. Closed suction drains were utilized in 26.1% of post-operative patients. Rate of intra-abdominal abscesses was significantly higher in the drain group (35.4% versus 8.8%, P < 0.001). Drains were more commonly used in patients receiving more units of PRBCs (median, 9 units [IQR 4-20] versus median 5.5 units, [IQR 2-14], P = 0.03). Drain use was found to be an independent risk factor for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess on multivariate analysis (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.7-14, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous conclusions that drain placement for operative liver trauma is associated with increased risks of infectious complications. Drains were used in patients with more severe liver injury, intra-operative bile leaks, penetrating trauma, and increased blood transfusion requirements. Future studies should focus on the development of specific guidelines for the use of drains in liver trauma.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Drenaje , Abdomen , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Hígado/lesiones , Hígado/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Surg Endosc ; 36(6): 4290-4298, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34988744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ileal Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by intraabdominal abscess, phlegmon, fistula, and/or microperforation is commonly treated with antibiotics, bowel rest, and percutaneous drainage followed by interval ileocolic resection (ICR). This "cool off" strategy is intended to facilitate the safe completion of a one-stage resection using a minimally invasive approach and minimize perioperative complications. There is limited data evaluating the benefits of delayed versus early resection. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) database at a tertiary center was queried from 2013-2020 to identify patients who underwent ICR for complicated ileal CD confirmed on preoperative imaging. ICR cohorts were classified as early (≤ 7 days) vs delayed (> 7 days) based on the interval from diagnostic imaging to surgery. Operative approach and 30-day postoperative morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 474 patients who underwent ICR over the 7-year period, 112 patients had complicated ileal CD including 99 patients (88%) with intraabdominal abscess. Early ICR was performed in 52 patients (46%) at a median of 3 days (IQR 2, 5) from diagnostic imaging. Delayed ICR was performed in 60 patients (54%) following a median "cool off" period of 23 days of non-operative treatment (IQR 14, 44), including preoperative percutaneous abscess drainage in 17 patients (28%). A higher proportion of patients with intraabdominal abscess underwent delayed vs early ICR (57% vs 43%, p = 0.19). Overall, there were no significant differences in the rate of laparoscopy (96% vs 90%), conversion to open surgery (12% vs 17%), rates of extended bowel resection (8% vs 13%), additional concurrent procedures (44% vs 52%), or fecal diversion (10% vs 2%) in the early vs delayed ICR groups. The median postoperative length of stay was 5 days in both groups with an overall 25% vs 17% (p = 0.39) 30-day postoperative complication rate and a 6% vs 5% 30-day readmission rate in early vs delayed ICR groups, respectively. Overall median follow-up time was 14.3 months (IQR 1.2, 24.1) with no difference in the rate of subsequent CD-related intestinal resection (4% vs 5%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary series, at a high-volume tertiary referral center, a "cool off" delayed resectional approach was not found to reduce perioperative complications in patients undergoing ICR for complicated ileal Crohn's disease. Laparoscopic ICR can be performed within one week of diagnosis with low rates of conversion and postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Enfermedad de Crohn , Laparoscopía , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Absceso/etiología , Absceso/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
BMC Urol ; 22(1): 140, 2022 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057571

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drainage is indicated in many patients with a perinephric abscess (PA). Surgical drainage is associated with trauma and slow recovery, while percutaneous drainage can be ineffective in some patients. We report on 11 patients with PA treated by percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction under local anesthesia. METHODS: This case series included 11 PA patients operated on from January 2013 to June 2020. All patients received percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction. Data, including operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of intraoperative pus suction, time of postoperative drainage tube indwelling, time to restore normal body temperature, length of postoperative hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications, were collected. RESULTS: The age of the patients was 59 (53-69) years. Eight, six, two, and two patients had hypertension, type 2 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and renal calculi, respectively. The operations were successful forall11 patients. Eight, two, and one patients required one, two, and three channels, respectively, to clear their abscess. The average operation time was 44 (30-65) min, and intraoperative blood loss was 16 (10-20) ml. The volume of intraoperative pus suction was 280 (200-400) ml, time of postoperative drainage tube indwelling was 8.2 (6-12) days, and time to restoring normal body temperature was 0.8 (0.5-2) days. The average postoperative hospital stay was 9.8 (7-14) days. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative follow-up time was typically 4.8 (3-8) months, and there were no recurrences. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction might be a feasible method for treating PA.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cálculos Renales , Infecciones Urinarias , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso/etiología , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Succión , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA