Acne vulgaris severity graded by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Acne is an inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit, which can be investigated in vivo using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). OBJECTIVES: By means of RCM and OCT to identify morphological characteristics of acne that may be associated with clinical acne severity. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate facial acne (n = 14, Investigators Global Assessment scale, IGA 1-3), and healthy participants (n = 7, IGA 0) were included in this explorative study. A total of 108 RCM image blocks and 54 OCT scans (each RCM and OCT image measuring 6 × 6 mm) were captured from lesional-, perilesional, and lesion-free skin areas. Acne lesions, infundibular regions of follicles and inflammation degree were compared in acne patients and healthy participants. RESULTS: Combined use of RCM and OCT demonstrated infundibular morphology, acne lesions, and blood flow. RCM images of perilesional- and lesion-free skin in acne patients revealed follicle infundibula with hyperkeratinized borders and abundant keratin plugs, contrasting skin of healthy participants. Higher acne severity related to increased number of follicles with hyperkeratotic borders (P = 0.04) and keratin plugs (P = 0.006), increased infundibulum diameter (P < 0.001), increased density of inflammatory cells (P < 0.001), and blood flow (P = 0.03). Acne lesion morphology was not associated with acne severity. CONCLUSION: Combined use of RCM and OCT elucidated distinctive follicle infundibulum characteristics and inflammation degree that were associated with acne severity. Future trials may apply imaging techniques to support clinical acne grading, and monitor treatment efficacy. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:104-113, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Dissecting folliculitis (dissecting cellulitis) of the scalp: a 66-patient case series and proposal of classification.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dissecting folliculitis (DF) or dissecting cellulitis of the scalp is regarded as a rare disease with disfiguring scarring alopecia. This study aimed to analyze the features of DF and to propose a classification to define its severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted. Patients with a histopathological diagnosis or clinical features leading to diagnosis of DF were included and classified into three stages. RESULTS: Among the 66 patients recruited (63 men / 3 women, mean age 24.9 years), multiple interconnected alopecic nodules involving the vertex scalp were the main feature. Histopathology showed an extensive inflamed granulation abscess forming a dissection plane in the lower dermis/subcutis in the acute stage. Lymphocytic infiltration was predominant in seven of 21 histology specimens. Overweight and obesity were noted in 29 of 45 patients examined. No association with smoking was found. There was comorbidity with acne conglobata in 15 of 66 patients, two of whom had acne inversa. Longer disease duration and greater number of nodules were associated with higher severity of DF (p < 0.05). A complete remission rate of 25 % was achieved by any treatment, and a rate of 37.5 % was achieved with oral isotretinoin alone. CONCLUSIONS: DF is not uncommon in Taiwan. An association with obesity needs to be clarified.

Evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne fulminans and its variants.

BACKGROUND: Acne fulminans (AF) is a severe variant of inflammatory acne. It typically manifests as an explosive worsening and ulceration of skin lesions, and can be associated with systemic symptoms. However, there is a paucity of evidence-based information and no clear guidelines concerning the classification and treatment of AF. OBJECTIVE: To better define the spectrum of AF and its variants, devise optimal therapeutic approaches, and identify areas of future research. METHODS: A panel of physicians with expertise in severe acne vulgaris was convened after a comprehensive literature review of severe acne variants. Priority topics were reviewed and presented by each panelist at a 5-hour conference. Following review of the audiotape and scribed notes from the conference, surveys were utilized to address points of controversy and to clarify consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Appropriate clinical case presentations and consensus survey questions were utilized to create final recommendations based on both the literature and the expert consensus. LIMITATIONS: Limited evidenced-based data and prospective studies in the literature concerning the treatment of AF is available. CONCLUSION: These guidelines better characterize AF and provide health care practitioners approaches to the classification, treatment, and prevention of AF and its variants.

Consensus-Based Acne Classification System and Treatment Algorithm for Spain. / Consenso español para establecer una clasificación y un algoritmo de tratamiento del acné.

Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease whose psychosocial effects can greatly impair quality of life. Various scales are used to classify the severity of acne, and several treatment algorithms are currently applied: no consensus on a common scale or treatment guidelines has been reached. A group of Spanish experts therefore met to identify a scale the majority could accept as the most appropriate for classifying severity and treating accordingly. The group chose the following classifications: comedonal acne, mild or moderate papulopustular acne, severe papulopustular acne, moderate nodular acne, and nodular-cystic acne (or acne tending to leave scars). Consensus was reached on first- and second-choice treatments for each type and on maintenance treatment. The experts also issued specific recommendations on antibiotic use (starting with mild or moderate papulopustular acne), always in combination with retinoids and/or benzoyl peroxide. The use of isotretinoin (starting at severe papulopustular or moderate nodular acne) was also covered.

New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number.

BACKGROUND: Post-acne atrophic scarring is a major concern for which standardized outcome measures are needed. Traditionally, this type of scar has been classified based on shape; but survey of practicing dermatologists has shown that atrophic scar morphology has not been well enough defined to allow good agreement in clinical classification. Reliance on clinical assessment is still needed at the current time, since objective tools are not yet available in routine practice.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate classification for atrophic acne scars by shape, size, and facial location and establish reliability in assessments.
METHODS: We conducted a non-interventional study with dermatologists performing live clinical assessments of atrophic acne scars. To objectively compare identification of lesions, individual lesions were marked on a high-resolution photo of the patient that was displayed on a computer during the clinical evaluation. The Jacob clinical classification system was used to define three primary shapes of scars 1) icepick, 2) boxcar, and 3) rolling. To determine agreement for classification by size, independent technicians assessed the investigators' markings on digital images. Identical localization of scars was denoted if the maximal distance between their centers was ≤ 60 pixels (approximately 3 mm). Raters assessed scars on the same patients twice (morning/afternoon). Aggregate models of rater assessments were created and analyzed for agreement.
RESULTS: Raters counted a mean scar count per subject ranging from 15.75 to 40.25 scars. Approximately 50% of scars were identified by all raters and ~75% of scars were identified by at least 2 of 3 raters (weak agreement, Kappa pairwise agreement 0.30). Agreement between consecutive counts was moderate, with Kappa index ranging from 0.26 to 0.47 (after exclusion of one outlier investigator who had significantly higher counts than all others). Shape classifications of icepick, boxcar, and rolling differed significantly between raters and even for same raters at consecutive sessions (P<.001 and P=0.4, respectively). Analysis showed only 65% of scars were identical in both sessions. We also found that there is a threshold of detection in terms of size, with poor agreement among investigators for very small scars (<2 mm). The repeatability of identification of scars ≥ 2.0 mm was acceptable, and we found that increasing scar size was positively correlated with agreement. Reliability was improved when only scars >2 mm were included. For smaller scars (<2 mm), inter-rater reliability was poor.
CONCLUSIONS: While intuitively it makes sense that describing scar morphology could guide treatment, we have shown that shape-based evaluations are subjective and do not readily yield strong agreement. Until there is a more objective way to evaluate morphology that is readily available to practicing clinicians, we propose that size should be considered a primary characteristic for scar classification systems. We further suggest classification of <2 mm, 2-4 mm, and >4 mm based on how the size would likely affect diagnostic and therapeutic choices. Finally, we recommend that scars <2 mm not be included in a clinical classification but should be evaluated by an objective method that may be refined in the future.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(6):693-702.

Subjective facial skin type, based on the sebum related symptoms, can reflect the objective casual sebum level in acne patients.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the subjective skin type and the casual sebum level was not fully clarified. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the characteristics of subjective skin type and to find the relationship between the subjective skin types and the skin type-related symptoms, casual sebum level, along with the objective skin type. METHODS: Seven hundred and nine patients, clinically diagnosed with acne, were included. The questionnaire and the casual sebum level measurement were performed. The determining symptoms of each subjective skin type were investigated. The 95% confidence interval of casual sebum level of each subjective skin type was calculated. RESULTS: The most frequent subjective skin type was the combination type. The dryness, tightness, and oiliness can be conclusive symptoms in determining the subjective skin type. The mean and the 95% confidence interval of the casual sebum level was highest in the oily skin type, followed by the combination, normal, and dry skin type. CONCLUSION: We found that the subjective skin type was determined by the skin type-related symptoms. The 95% confidence intervals of the casual sebum level of each subjective skin type were established. Based on the skin type-related symptoms, the casual sebum level of acne patients can be estimated.

Auto-classification of acne lesions using multimodal imaging.

Differentiating inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesions and obtaining lesion counts is pivotal part of acne evaluation. Manual lesion counting has reliably demonstrated the clinical efficacy of anti-acne products for decades. However, maintaining assessment consistency within and across acne trials is an important consideration since lesion counting can be subjective to the individual evaluators, and the technique has not been rigorously standardized. VISIA-CR is a multi-spectral and multi-modal facial imaging system. It captures fluorescence images of Horn and Porphyrin, absorption images of Hemoglobin and Melanin, and skin texture and topography characterizing broad-spectrum polarized and non-polarized images. These images are analyzed for auto-classification of inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesion, measurement of erythema, and post-acne pigmentation changes. In this work the accuracy of this acne lesion auto-classification technique is demonstrated by comparing the auto-detected lesions counts with those counted by expert physicians. The accuracy is further substantiated by comparing and confirming the facial location and type of every auto-identified acne lesion with those identified by the physicians. Our results indicate a strong correlation between manual and auto-classified lesion counts (correlation coefficient >0.9) for both inflammatory and non inflammatory lesions This technology has the potential to eliminate the tedium of manual lesion counting, and provide an accurate, reproducible, and clinically relevant evaluation of acne lesions. As an aid to physicians it will allow development of a standardized technique for evaluating acne in clinical research, as well as accurately choosing treatment options for their patients according to the severity of a specific lesion type in clinical practice

Acne analysis, grading and computational assessment methods: an overview.

INTRODUCTION: This paper presents a comprehensive review of acne grading and measurement. Acne is a chronic disorder of the pilosebaceous units, with excess sebum production, follicular epidermal hyperproliferation, inflammation and Propionibacterium acnes activity. Most patients are affected with acne vulgaris, which is the prevalent type of acne. Acne vulgaris consists of comedones (whitehead and blackhead), papules, pustules, nodules and cysts. OBJECTIVES: To review and identify the issues for acne vulgaris grading and computational assessment methods. To determine the future direction for addressing the identified issues. METHODS: There are two main methods of assessment for acne severity grading, namely, lesion counting and comparison of patient with a photographic standard. For the computational assessment method, the emphasis is on computational imaging techniques. RESULTS: Current acne grading methods are very time consuming and tedious. Generally, they rely on approximation for counting lesions and hence the assessment is quite subjective, with both inter and intra-observer variability. It is important to accurately assess acne grade to evaluate its severity as this influences treatment selection and assessment of response to therapy. This will further help in better disease management and more efficacious treatment. CONCLUSION: Semi-automated or automated methods based on computational imaging techniques should be devised for acne grade assessment.

[An investigational study of acne treatment in France]. / Enquête sur la prise en charge des patients acnéiques en France.

BACKGROUND: Acne is one of the main reasons for dermatological consultation. Management may seem standardized, in particular for mild to moderate juvenile facial acne, where topical treatments are used for mild cases and topical treatments associated with systemic antibiotics are used for moderate cases. The aim of this investigational study was to evaluate current treatment approaches for mild to moderate acne patients by French dermatologists in private practice. METHODS: During this study, more than 252 dermatologists practising in over 144 French cities were asked about their preferred treatments (other than isotretinoin) for young acne patients. A questionnaire containing information about patient characteristics, disease severity and the prescribed therapy was completed by dermatologists at baseline and 2 months later. RESULTS: In total, 3145 acne patients were analyzed. This study showed that in 53% of cases, dermatologists prescribed several topical treatments (up to three) associated with one or several systemic therapies (up to three), in addition to a cosmetic product. In 51% of cases, dermatologists prescribed only application of a dermatological cosmetic product for patients with very mild acne; in 41% of cases, a single treatment, especially a topical treatment, was prescribed for patients with mild acne, and in 59 and 64% of cases, two treatments (a combination of local and systemic therapy) were prescribed respectively for patients with moderate and severe acne. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the complexity of management of acne patients by dermatologists, particularly in the case of mild to severe acne. Most notably, such therapeutic complexity raises the question of compliance, a key factor in successful treatment.

[Therapy of acne scars]. / Therapie der Aknenarben.

Acne scarring is common but difficult to treat. A descriptive, universally acceptable classification system of atrophic acne scars includes three scar types: icepick, boxcar, and rolling. Erythema and, less often, pigmentary changes may be associated. Once the scar type has been defined, appropriate treatment regimens can be offered. It is important to emphasize to the patient that acne scars can be improved by a variety of medical or surgical methods but never entirely reversed.

[Feasibility and reliability of the Spanish version of the Leeds Revised Acne Grading Scale]. / Factibilidad y fiabilidad de la versión española de la escala revisada de gravedad de Leeds (LRAG) para pacientes con acné.

BACKGROUND: Although there are more than 25 acne grading systems, there is no consensus on which is most appropriate. Unification of the classifications is recommended in order to facilitate therapeutic decisions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and reliability of the Spanish version of the Leeds revised acne grading (LRAG) scale in patients with acne vulgaris in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in Spain, including patients with acne affecting at least 1 of 3 regions: face, back, or chest. Patients were assessed using the LRAG scale and lesion counting. Changes in the scores were determined at 4-6 weeks, and were correlated with the lesion count. Physicians were asked 4 questions regarding difficulty using the scale and the time employed. RESULTS: A total of 259 sites of acne were assessed in 239 patients at 57 centers. The majority of physicians (89.5%) stated that the LRAG scale was not difficult to use. The mean administration time was 3.12min. Cross-sectional validity (P<.012 for the face, P<.001 for the back and chest), longitudinal validity (P<.0001 for the face, back, and chest), and intraobserver and interobserver reliability (Cronbach α >0.8) were significant for inflammatory lesions in all regions. Sensitivity to change was demonstrated for lesions in all regions, based on the correlation between the difference in severity and the number of lesions recorded by the LRAG, and the difference in the lesion count between baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the LRAG scale is a practical and reliable tool and is sensitive to change. It is a valid tool for the objective assessment of the severity of acne.

Remote assessment of acne: the use of acne grading tools to evaluate digital skin images.

Digital imaging of dermatology patients is a novel approach to remote data collection. A number of assessment tools have been developed to grade acne severity and to track clinical progress over time. Although these tools have been validated when used in a face-to-face setting, their efficacy and reliability when used to assess digital images have not been examined. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether specific assessment tools designed to grade acne during face-to-face visits can be applied to the evaluation of digital images. The secondary purpose was to ascertain whether images obtained by subjects are of adequate quality to allow such assessments to be made. Three hundred (300) digital images of patients with mild to moderate facial inflammatory acne from an ongoing randomized-controlled study were included in this analysis. These images were obtained from 20 patients and consisted of sets of 3 images taken over time. Of these images, 120 images were captured by subjects themselves and 180 were taken by study staff. Subjects were asked to retake their photographs if the initial images were deemed of poor quality by study staff. Images were evaluated by two dermatologists-in-training using validated acne assessment measures: Total Inflammatory Lesion Count, Leeds technique, and the Investigator's Global Assessment. Reliability of raters was evaluated using correlation coefficients and kappa statistics. Of the different acne assessment measures tested, the inter-rater reliability was highest for the total inflammatory lesion count (r = 0.871), but low for the Leeds technique (kappa = 0.381) and global assessment (kappa = 0.3119). Raters were able to evaluate over 89% of all images using each type of acne assessment measure despite the fact that images obtained by study staff were of higher quality than those obtained by patients (p < 0.001). Several existing clinical assessment measures can be used to evaluate digital images obtained from subjects with inflammatory acne lesions. The level of inter-rater agreement is highly variable across assessment measures, and we found the Total Inflammatory Lesion Count to be the most reliable. This measure could be used to allow a dermatologist to remotely track a patient's progress over time.

High Body Mass Index is a Risk Factor for Acne Severity in Adolescents: A Preliminary Report.

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common chronic dermatological diseases among adolescents. Recent data indicated that a specific diet may affect the course and appearance of acne. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and acne prevalence and severity. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 143 consecutively recruited adolescents aged between 12 and 18. All participants were physically examined, including measurement of weight and height and type and severity of acne. Acne lesions were evaluated as not present (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3). The predominant type of acne lesions was used to classify the acne into one of the following subtypes: comedonic acne, papulo-pustular acne, and nodulo-cystic acne. Acne was present in 123 adolescents (86.0%) being more prevalent in teenagers ≥15 years old than in those between 12 and 14 years old (97.1% vs. 76.0%, respectively, P<0.001). The prevalence of acne did not differ significantly between teenagers with different BMI. However, those teenagers who were overweight or obese suffer from the inflammatory type of acne (papulo-pustular or nodulo-cystic) more often compared with underweight, slim, or normal-weight teenagers (P=0.03). The mean BMI value in patients with comedonic acne was significantly lower (mean BMI ± Standard Deviation (SD): 20.0±3.5 kg/m2) when compared with papulo-pustular acne (22.2±3.8 kg/m2, P=0.04) or nodulo-cystic acne (23.9±5.1 kg/m2, P<0.01). The BMI value correlated significantly with the severity of acne (ρ=0.33, P<0.001) and with higher number of skin areas involved with acne (ρ=0.23, P<0.01). Our findings clearly indicate the association between overweight/obesity and acne. Such a relationship has a significant impact on the treatment of patients with acne, as therapy should focus not only on proper selection of medications but also take into account modification of the patient's dietary habits, physical activity, and, if necessary, reduction of body weight.

Correlation between Family History and the Age of Onset of Childhood Acne in Relation to Sex and Type of Acne.

Acne vulgaris is a common chronic skin disorder of the pilosebaceous unit with a wide range of clinical presentations, which depend on the age of onset of acne, sex, family history of acne, and genetic factors, especially the genes affecting keratinization and desquamation. This retrospective study investigated pediatric acne using the patients' past medical history, with patients aged from newborns to 15 years of age. Acne were further stratified by 5 parameters: sex, age, family history, acne type, and localization. Our main aim was to investigate the possible association between selected parameters and the presence or absence of family history of acne. We did not find statistically significant correlation between sex, age of onset, and positive family history of acne. Furthermore, we did not find any association between age of onset and family history according to family members (mother/father/brother or sister). However, we found statistically significant correlation between sex and type of acne. This retrospective analysis of pediatric acne in Croatia did not reveal statistically significant correlation between positive family history and sex, age of onset, and clinical type of acne. In analyzing the correlation between family history and localization of acne, however, we found that the number of patients with acne localized on both the face and trunk and positive family history was statistically significant higher than expected.

Can we define acne as a chronic disease? If so, how and when?

There is widespread misunderstanding of acne amongst both the medical and lay community, who often perceive the condition to be a simple, self-limited affliction of adolescents. Because many think that the disease "will go away on its own," they do not feel an urgency to aggressively treat acne. However, very often the reality is that acne treatment can be quite difficult. Furthermore, acne can be a devastating disease for the patient, since it manifests on visible body parts and in children near puberty, who are vulnerable both socially and psychologically. Most typically, acne is not an acute disease but rather a condition that continuously changes in its distribution and severity. Usually, acne treatment is necessary for many months and sometimes years. Despite treatment, acne may cause scarring and associated negative psychological effects. It is important for both patients and physicians to be aware that very effective treatments are available. It is also important to realize that new studies have proven the benefit of maintenance therapy with topical retinoids; these agents can minimize the potential for relapse, which is part of the natural history of acne. This article reviews the evidence suggesting that acne is a chronic disease in at least a subset of individuals. The members of the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne believe that acne should be recognized and investigated as a chronic disease. This will change expectations of clinical trial design and treatment and will highlight gaps in the knowledge of acne epidemiology. The result should be an improvement in patient outcomes.

The advantage of establishing homogeneous patient groups: is it worth isolating 'juvenile acne of the face'?

BACKGROUND: Acne is a highly heterogeneous disorder with respect to its regional involvement, demographics, lesion types and response to treatment. Homogeneous patient groups must therefore be created before measuring the severity of acne and interpreting the results of therapeutic trials. The individualization of 'juvenile acne of the face' is a first step in this direction. METHODS: Based on textbooks, major reviews of acne and a 'Medline' literature search, we identified four key points to delineate sub groups of acne patients. RESULT: 'Juvenile acne of the face' is defined by four main clinical criteria: (1) age (from puberty to age 25 years), (2) site (face), (3) lesion type (polymorphous), (4) absence of a causal factor. Other subgroups of 'true' acne are listed with their distinctive characteristics. Non-acne follicular diseases (i.e. without sebum retention) are listed. DISCUSSION: We chose 'juvenile acne of the face' to define the first homogeneous group of patients because it is the most frequent form of acne and the target of most acne drugs. It has a sufficiently uniform prognosis to devise a functional and reproducible severity rating scale with the aim of facilitating the evaluation and comparison of therapeutic methods. CONCLUSION: The next step in our work will be to elaborate severity scales which are dedicated to a single type of acne.

Evaluation of the newly established acne severity classification among Japanese and Korean dermatologists.

Recently, we established an acne severity classification that is based on scientific evidence. Our classification allows three different methods for grading, which include general impression of consulted dermatologist, photograph-based estimation by independent experts, and grading by lesion counting. In our classification, we proposed standard photographs for the estimation of general severity to adjust the basis of judgments. In this study, we evaluated the validity of our classification. We made questionnaires of acne severity using acne patients' photographs, which were selected from the collection of representative photographs of our classification. Participants answered these questionnaires before and after our presentations about our classification of acne severity. We identified the conformity rate with our consensus decision. The results revealed that average conformity rates were raised from 67.0% to 88.9% among Japanese dermatologists and from 68.0% to 79.8% among Korean ones. These data show the adequacy of both our grading system itself and its presentation. We believe our classification will be one of the most effective and reasonable grading systems to classify acne severity.

Establishment of grading criteria for acne severity.

For the epidemiological surveys and evaluations of therapy, it is essential to evaluate the severity of diseases. There are several reported methods of assessment for acne severity including lesion counting, comparison of the patient's to a photographic standard and comparison of the patient's to a text description. But all of these are based on opinions of specialists. In this study, we attempted to make an evidence-based grading criteria for acne severity, which was expected to yield consents from most dermatologists. The dermatologists consulted classified the global severity of acne patients without any standard and then counted the numbers of eruptions. Three independent expert dermatologists graded the photographs of these patients. We compared the verdicts of the consulted dermatologist and three experienced dermatologists, and analyzed the relationships between these classifications and numbers of eruptions. Our results showed that most of the dermatologists have similar latent recognitions of acne severity. We selected representative photographs as standards, which would contribute to making adjustments for judgments. Global classifications of dermatologists correlated with numbers of inflammatory eruptions (papules plus pustules), but did not with numbers of comedones. The appropriate divisions of inflammatory eruptions of half of the face to decide classifications were: 0-5, "mild"; 6-20, "moderate"; 21-50, "severe"; and more than 50, "very severe".

[Clinical and psychological correlation in acne: use of the ECLA and CADI scales]. / Corrélation clinique et psychologique dans l'acné: utilisation des grilles ECLA et CADI.

BACKGROUND: The psychological consequences of acne are frequently unrelated to the severity of the actual lesions. Thus, a number of scales have been designed and validated to allow quantitation of the severity of acne, such as the ECLA scale (Echelle de Cotation des Lésions d'Acné or Acne Lesion Score Scale) while others are designed to evaluate quality of life, such as the CADI (Cardiff Acne Disability Index) questionnaire recently validated in the French language. The purpose of this study was to use both of these scales in individual applications in order to determine whether or not any correlation exists between the two specific tools and to determine the two groups of patients affected by acne. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight acne patients (21+/-6.8 years) seen by seven dermatologists were included in this study. The severity of their acne was evaluated using the ECLA scale; the seven participating dermatologists were trained in the use of this scoring system. In addition, patients completed the CADI quality-of-life questionnaire after their consultation. Each factor on the ECLA was compared with each item in the CADI questionnaire by means of analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was no correlation between overall scores on the ECLA and CADI scales (r(2)=0.0242). However, a positive correlation was observed between overall CADI score and factors F1 and F3 in the ECLA scale (p=0.0085 and p=0.0373 respectively). In contrast, the global score on the ECLA scale was significantly correlated with item 5 of the CADI questionnaire, namely patients' perception of their acne (p=0.0035). CONCLUSION: Acne, even in mild forms, has a detrimental psychological effect on patients. The ECLA score coupled with the CADI assessment system appear to be two useful and complementary scores for use in complete acne patient management.