Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 230
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Control ; 28: 10732748211045593, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34558349

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infections impact mortality in oncology patients. Given the low rate of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, low virulence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, and advent of rapid diagnostic systems, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed empiric therapy in vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-colonized patients with neutropenic fever may be unnecessary, promoting increased antimicrobial resistance, drug-related toxicity, and cost. METHODS: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-colonized adults admitted for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or induction therapy for acute leukemia/myeloid sarcoma with neutropenic fever were stratified by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia development and empiric vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed antimicrobial strategy for first neutropenic fever (Empiric Therapy vs. non-Empiric Therapy). Primary endpoints included vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-related, in-hospital, and 100-day mortality rates. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia incidence for first neutropenic fever and the entire hospitalization, length of stay, Clostridioides difficile infection rate, and duration and cost of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy. RESULTS: During first neutropenic fever, 3 of 70 eligible patients (4%) developed vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia. Although all 3 (100%) were non-Empiric Therapy, no mortality (0%) occurred. Of 67 patients not developing vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, 42 (63%) received Empiric Therapy and 25 (37%) non-Empiric Therapy. Empiric Therapy had significantly greater median duration (3 days vs. 0 days; P<.001) and cost ($1604 vs. $0; P<.001) of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy but demonstrated no significant differences in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest Empiric Therapy may offer no clinical benefit to this population, regardless of whether vancomycin-resistant enterococcus is identified in blood culture or no pathogen is found. Such an approach may only expose the majority of patients to unnecessary vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy and drug-related toxicities while increasing institutional drug and monitoring costs. Even in the few patients developing vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, waiting until the organism is identified in culture to start directed therapy likely makes no difference in mortality. This lack of benefit warrants consideration to potentially omit empiric vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy in first neutropenic fever in many of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Enterococcus , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sociodemográficos
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 572, 2021 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34126951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and represent a major healthcare burden. Carbapenem-resistant (CR) strains of Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenting pathogens further complicate treatment approaches. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the US Premier Healthcare Database (2014-2019) in hospitalised adults with a UTI to estimate the healthcare burden of Gram-negative CR UTIs among patients with or without concurrent bacteraemia. RESULTS: Among the 47,496 patients with UTI analysed, CR infections were present in 2076 (4.4%). Bacteraemia was present in 24.5% of all UTI patients, and 1.7% of these were caused by a CR pathogen. The most frequent CR pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (49.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.2%). Patients with CR infections had a significantly longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (median [range] 8 [5-12] days vs 6 [4-10] days, P < 0.001), were less likely to be discharged home (38.4% vs 51.0%, P < 0.001), had a higher readmission rate (22.6% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), and had greater LOS-associated charges (mean US$ 91,752 vs US$ 66,011, P < 0.001) than patients with carbapenem-susceptible (CS) infections, respectively. The impact of CR pathogens was greater in patients with bacteraemia (or urosepsis) and these CR urosepsis patients had a significantly higher rate of mortality than those with CS urosepsis (10.5% vs 6.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalised patients with UTIs, the presence of a CR organism and bacteraemia increased the burden of disease, with worse outcomes and higher hospitalisation charges than disease associated with CS pathogens and those without bacteraemia.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas/fisiología , Infecciones Urinarias/economía , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
3.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(10): e28643, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32785971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infections are common and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during treatment of childhood leukemia. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of levofloxacin antibiotic prophylaxis, compared to no prophylaxis, in children receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PROCEDURES: A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of the single-payer health care system using a lifetime horizon. A comprehensive literature review identified available evidence for effectiveness, safety, costs of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with leukemia, and health utilities associated with the relevant health states. The effects of levofloxacin prophylaxis on health outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and direct health costs were derived from a combined decision tree and state-transition model. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the sensitivity of results to parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: The literature review revealed one randomized controlled trial on levofloxacin prophylaxis in childhood AML and relapsed ALL, by Alexander et al, that showed a significant reduction in rates of fever and neutropenia (71.2% vs 82.1%) and bacteremia (21.9% vs 43.4%) with levofloxacin compared to no prophylaxis. In our cost-utility analysis, levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant over no prophylaxis, resulting in cost savings of $542.44 and increased survival of 0.13 QALY. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant in 98.8% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggests that levofloxacin prophylaxis, compared to no prophylaxis, is cost saving in children receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML or relapsed ALL.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Bacteriemia/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/economía , Levofloxacino/economía , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/economía , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/patología , Niño , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patología , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 650, 2019 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the oral switch (OS) stewardship intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a convenience sample in two Brazilian ICUs from different hospitals in patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy. The stewardship intervention included OS in patients diagnosed with sepsis when clinical stability was achieved. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Other variables evaluated were as follows: cost of antimicrobial treatment, daily costs of intensive care, acute kidney injury, and length of stay. RESULTS: There was no difference in mortality between the OS and non-OS groups (p = 0.06). Length of stay in the ICU (p = 0.029) was shorter and acute kidney injury incidence (p = 0.032) and costs of antimicrobial therapy (p < 0.001) were lower in the OS group. CONCLUSION: OS stewardship programs in the ICU may be considered a safe strategy. Switch therapy reduced the cost and shortened the length of stay in ICUs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anciano , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/economía , Brasil , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 16(1): 198, 2018 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) have been widely used for patients with severe conditions. However, they increase the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), which is associated with high economic burden. Until now, no study has focused on the cost attributable to CRBSI in China, and data on its economic burden are unavailable. The aim of this study was to assess the cost attributable to CRBSI and its influencing factors. METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study and multivariate analysis were conducted in a tertiary hospital, with 94 patients (age ≥ 18 years old) from January 2011 to November 2015. Patients with CRBSI were matched to those without CRBSI by age, principal diagnosis, and history of surgery. The difference in cost between the case group and control group during the hospitalization was calculated as the cost attributable to CRBSI, which included the total cost and five specific cost categories: drug, diagnostic imaging, laboratory testing, health care technical services, and medical material. The relation between the total cost attributable to CRBSI and its influencing factors such as demographic characteristics, diagnosis and treatment, and pathogenic microorganism, was analysed with a general linear model (GLM). RESULTS: The total cost attributable to CRBSI was $3528.6, and the costs of specific categories including drugs, diagnostic imaging, laboratory testing, health care technical services, and medical material, were $2556.4, $112.1, $321.7, $268.7, $276.5, respectively. GLM analysis indicated that the total cost was associated with the intensive care unit (ICU), pathogenic microorganism, age, and catheter number, according to the sequence of standardized estimate (ß). ICU contributed the most to the model R-square. CONCLUSION: Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection represents a great economic burden for patients. More attentions should be paid to further prevent and control this infection in China.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Adulto Joven
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993852

RESUMEN

The clinical and economic impacts of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria are incompletely understood. From 2009 to 2015, all adult inpatients with Gram-negative BSI at our institution were prospectively enrolled. MDR status was defined as resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes. Clinical outcomes and inpatient costs associated with the MDR phenotype were identified. Among 891 unique patients with Gram-negative BSI, 292 (33%) were infected with MDR bacteria. In an adjusted analysis, only history of Gram-negative infection was associated with MDR BSI versus non-MDR BSI (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 2.16; P = 0.002). Patients with MDR BSI had increased BSI recurrence (1.7% [5/292] versus 0.2% [1/599]; P = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (median, 10.0 versus 8.0 days; P = 0.0005). Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between MDR (26.4% [77/292]) and non-MDR (21.7% [130/599]) groups (P = 0.12). Unadjusted mean costs were 1.62 times higher in MDR than in non-MDR BSI ($59,266 versus $36,452; P = 0.003). This finding persisted after adjustment for patient factors and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (means ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.36; P = 0.01). Adjusted analysis of patient subpopulations revealed that the increased cost of MDR BSI occurred primarily among patients with hospital-acquired infections (MDR means ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.82; P = 0.008). MDR Gram-negative BSI are associated with recurrent BSI, longer hospital stays, and increased mean inpatient costs. MDR BSI in patients with hospital-acquired infections primarily account for the increased cost.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 65(3): 766-774, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28236919

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVGs) are proposed as an alternative to tunneled central venous catheters (TCVCs) in patients requiring immediate vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). We compared bacteremia rates in patients treated with ecAVG and TCVC. METHODS: The study randomized 121 adult patients requiring urgent vascular access for HD in a 1:1 fashion to receive an ecAVG with or without (+/-) an arteriovenous fistula (AVF; n = 60) or TCVC+/-AVF (n = 61). Patients were excluded if they had active systemic sepsis, no anatomically suitable vessels, or an anticipated life expectancy <3 months. The primary end point was the culture-proven bacteremia rate at 6 months, with the trial powered to detect a reduction in bacteremia from 24% to 5% (α = .05, ß = .8). Secondary end points included thrombosis, reintervention, and mortality. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Culture-proven bacteremia developed in 10 patients (16.4%) in the TCVC arm ≤6 months compared with two (3.3%) in the ecAVG+/-AVF arm (risk ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.56; P = .02). Mortality was also higher in the TCVC+/-AVF cohort (16% [n = 10] vs 5% [n = 3]; risk ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45; P = .04). The difference in treatment cost between the two arms was not significant (£11,393 vs £9692; P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TCVC+/-AVF, a strategy of ecAVG+/-AVF reduced the rate of culture-proven bacteremia and mortality in patients requiring urgent vascular access for HD. The strategy also proved to be cost-neutral.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Prótesis Vascular/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Cateterismo/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Diálisis Renal/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Escocia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 64(2): 324-329, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27555523

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of ambulatory bloodstream infections (Amb-BSIs) in pediatric oncology and stem cell transplant (PO/SCT) patients is poorly understood, although a large portion of their treatment increasingly occurs in this setting. This study aimed to understand the economic impact and length of stay (LOS) associated with these infections. PROCEDURE: Charges and LOS were retrospectively collected and analyzed for Amb-BSI events leading to a hospital admission between 2012 and 2013 in a tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. Events were grouped as BSI-MIXED when hospitalizations with care unrelated to the infection-extended LOS by more than 24 hr or as BSI-PURE for all others. Billing codes were used to group charges and main drivers were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-four BSI events were identified in 61 patients. Sixty-nine percent met definition for central line-associated BSI (CLABSI). Median total charge and LOS for an Amb-BSI were $40,852 (interquartile range [IQR] $44,091) and 7 days (IQR 6), respectively. Median charges for BSI-PURE group (N = 62) were $36,611 (IQR $34,785) and $89,935 (IQR $153,263) in the BSI-MIXED (N = 12) group. Median LOS was 6 (IQR 5) days in the BSI-PURE group and 15 (IQR 24) in the BSI-MIXED. Room, pharmacy, and procedure charges accounted for more than 70% of total charges in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Amb-BSIs in PO/SCT patients result in significant healthcare charges and unplanned extended hospital admissions. This analysis suggests that efforts aiming at reducing rates of infections could result in substantial system savings, validating the need for increased efforts to prevent Amb-BSIs.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Precios de Hospital/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Trasplante de Células Madre/economía , Atención Ambulatoria , Bacteriemia/etiología , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Preescolar , Enfermedades Transmisibles/complicaciones , Enfermedades Transmisibles/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/microbiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 53, 2017 01 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters are widely used in hospitalized patients. However, up to 56% of the catheters do not have an appropriate indication and some serious complications with the use of these catheters can occur. The main objective of our quality improvement project is to reduce the use of catheters without an appropriate indication by 25-50%, and to evaluate the affecting factors of our de-implementation strategy. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective interrupted time series analysis, several interventions to avoid inappropriate use of catheters will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Firstly, we will define a list of appropriate indications for urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters, which will restrict the use of catheters and urge catheter removal when the indication is no longer appropriate. Secondly, after the baseline measurements, the intervention will take place, which consists of a kick-off meeting, including a competitive feedback report of the baseline measurements, and education of healthcare workers and patients. Additional strategies based on the baseline data and local conditions are optional. The primary endpoint is the percentage of catheters with an inappropriate indication on the day of data collection before and after the de-implementation strategy. Secondary endpoints are catheter-related infections or other complications, catheter re-insertion rate, length of hospital (and ICU) stay and mortality. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the de-implementation strategy will be calculated. DISCUSSION: This study aims to reduce the use of urinary and intravenous catheters with an inappropriate indication, and as a result reduce the catheter-related complications. If (cost-) effective it provides a tool for a nationwide approach to reduce catheter-related infections and other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry: NTR6015 . Registered 9 August 2016.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres de Permanencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Urinario/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres Urinarios/virología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Masculino , Países Bajos , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/economía , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
10.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 22(6): 485-489, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28429519

RESUMEN

The use of antibiotic lock solutions as prophylaxis for catheter-associated blood stream infection (CRBSI) has been shown to be effective in previous randomized controlled trials. However, the cost-effectiveness of this approach had not been studied. In 2012, the routine gentamicin-heparin lock solution used in Auckland City Hospital was withdrawn from the market, leading to a change to heparin-only lock. This was then replaced with gentamicin-citrate lock in 2014. This situation allowed review of the CRBSI rate and financial impact of different catheter lock solutions. A retrospective audit was performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015 to investigate the rate of culture-proven CRBSI in patients with tunneled cuffed dialysis catheters. There were 89 cases of CRBSI involving 64 patients in the 5-year period. In comparison with the heparin-only lock, both gentamicin-heparin and gentamicin-citrate locks had a significantly lower rate of bacteremia, with rate ratios of 0.46 (confidence interval 0.30-0.72) and 0.11 (confidence interval 0.05-0.22), respectively. The inpatient costs as a consequence of the CRBSI were NZ$27 792 per 1000 catheter days for heparin-only lock, NZ$10 608.56 per 1000 catheter days for gentamicin-heparin lock, and NZ$ 1898.45 per 1000 catheter days for gentamicin-citrate lock. The lack of antibiotic lock solutions led to an increase in bacteremia rates and higher financial cost for inpatient management of bacteremia. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent supply of pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Diálisis Renal/economía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 34(10): 620-625, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26564375

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The excess cost associated with nosocomial bacteraemia (NB) is used as a measurement of the impact of these infections. However, some authors have suggested that traditional methods overestimate the incremental cost due to the presence of various types of bias. The aim of this study was to compare three assessment methods of NB incremental cost to correct biases in previous analyses. METHODS: Patients who experienced an episode of NB between 2005 and 2007 were compared with patients grouped within the same All Patient Refined-Diagnosis-Related Group (APR-DRG) without NB. The causative organisms were grouped according to the Gram stain, and whether bacteraemia was caused by a single or multiple microorganisms, or by a fungus. Three assessment methods are compared: stratification by disease; econometric multivariate adjustment using a generalised linear model (GLM); and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for biases in the econometric model. RESULTS: The analysis included 640 admissions with NB and 28,459 without NB. The observed mean cost was €24,515 for admissions with NB and €4,851.6 for controls (without NB). Mean incremental cost was estimated at €14,735 in stratified analysis. Gram positive microorganism had the lowest mean incremental cost, €10,051. In the GLM, mean incremental cost was estimated as €20,922, and adjusting with PSM, the mean incremental cost was €11,916. The three estimates showed important differences between groups of microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Using enhanced methodologies improves the adjustment in this type of study and increases the value of the results.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Hospitalización , Humanos
12.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 96(24): 1903-6, 2016 Jun 28.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27373357

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) on clinical outcome and medical cost in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients admitted into Changhai Hospital between January 2013 and December 2014, who suffered from BSI due to Klebsiella pneumoniae during hospitalization. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether Klebsiella pneumoniae produced ESBL (ESBL positive group and ESBL negative group). They were matched with propensity score matching method in a 1∶1 ratio and then multiple regression model was used to analyze the impact of ESBL on clinical outcome and medical cost. Clinical outcome was evaluated by 30-day mortality post BSI; medical cost was evaluated by total length of stay (LOS), post-BSI LOS, total hospital cost and antimicrobial cost. RESULTS: Before matching, the two groups were significantly different in age, nosocomial infection rate, LOS before BSI and surgical rate during hospitalization (all P<0.05). The ESBL-positive group had higher 30-day mortality post BSI (21.3% vs 8.7%, P=0.054), and higher total LOS [25.0(12.0, 33.0) vs 16.0(10.0, 23.0) d, P=0.015], post-BSI LOS [16.0(9.0, 26.0) vs 10.0(5.0, 16.0) d, P=0.006], total hospital cost [69 409(40 605, 198 021) vs 45 683(28 448, 67 000) ï¿¥, P<0.001] and antimicrobial cost [10 279(4 815, 25 500) vs 3 783(1 596, 11 879) ï¿¥, P<0.001]. After matching, the two groups had no significant differences in clinical characteristics such as sex, age, nosocomial infection rate, LOS before BSI, APACHEⅡ score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, underlying diseases and surgical rate during hospitalization (all P>0.05). Multiple regression analysis indicated that ESBL could significantly increase the total LOS, post-BSI LOS, total hospital cost and antimicrobial cost (all P<0.001), but did not increase the 30-day mortality post BSI (P=0.910). CONCLUSIONS: ESBL can significantly increase the medical cost in patients with BSI due to Klebsiella pneumoniae but does not increase the 30-day mortality post BSI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/economía , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Tiempo de Internación/economía , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Antibacterianos/economía , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/sangre , Infecciones por Klebsiella/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
14.
Polim Med ; 46(1): 59-69, 2016.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28397420

RESUMEN

One of the main problems of modern medicine are infections. They can be divided into local and general (depending on infected tissues and/or organs) or hospital and community-acquired infections (depending on the location and source of infection). The occurrence of infection reduces the ability for quick recovery, and in case of complications the ability to continue professional activity. Bacteria can be present in the vascular system causing vein, artery, capillary infection or blood infection (bacteremia). The vascular system infection can be connected with medical procedures, type and chemical composition of used medical devices or biomaterials. The usage of central or peripheral venous catheters can increase the risk factor of vascular system infection. The main risk factors of hospital infection are: patient's condition, surgical procedure and hospital aseptic procedures. Improving the current state of knowledge of medical personnel and implementation of well-designed prevention procedures can contribute to reducing hospital infection factors. The technical quality of used medical devices (e.g. anti-bacterial coat on vascular prostheses) can also reduce the risk of infection. Raising awareness and educating the patient (e.g. with infected trophic ulcers) can be an important element of control and prevention of nosocomial and communityacquired infections. Medical literature containing procedures and descriptions of specific medical cases related to development process of infections was analysed. The literature confirms the significant magnitude of the problems associated with the vascular system infections.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/etiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi ; 18(4): 311-5, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097574

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical features and hospital costs of neonatal sepsis caused by Gram-positive (G(+)) bacteria, Gram-negative (G(-)) bacteria, and fungi. METHODS: The clinical data of 236 neonates with sepsis were analyzed retrospectively. Among these neonates, 110 had sepsis caused by G(+) bacteria, 68 had sepsis caused by G(-) bacteria, and 58 had sepsis caused by fungi. RESULTS: Full-term infants accounted for 62% and 38%, respectively, in the G(+) bacteria and G(-) bacteria groups, and preterm infants accounted for 86% in the fungi group. The neonates in the fungi group had significantly lower gestational ages and birth weights than those in the G(+) and G(-) bacteria groups (P<0.05). Compared with the G(+) bacteria group, the G(-) bacteria and fungi groups had significantly higher rates of multiple births (P<0.0125). Compared with the G(+) bacteria and fungi groups, the rates of premature rupture of membranes >18 hours, grade III amniotic fluid contamination, and early-onset sepsis in the G(-) bacteria group were significantly higher (P<0.0125). Compared with the G(-) bacteria and fungi groups, the G(+) bacteria group showed significantly higher rates of abnormal body temperature, omphalitis or herpes as the symptom suggesting the onset of such disease (P<0.0125). The fungi group had significantly higher incidence rates of apnea and low platelet count than the G(+) and G(-) bacteria groups (P<0.0125). The comparison of length of hospital stay and total hospital costs between any two groups showed that the fungi group had a significantly longer hospital stay and significantly higher total hospital costs than the G(+) and G(-) bacteria groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis caused by G(+) bacteria mainly occurs in full-term infants, and most cases of sepsis caused by G(-) bacteria belong to the early-onset type. Sepsis caused by fungi is more common in preterm infants and low birth weight infants, and has high incidence rates of apnea and low platelet count, as well as a longer hospital stay and higher hospital costs than sepsis caused by bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Fungemia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino
16.
J Pediatr ; 167(6): 1280-6, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26456740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of universal vs targeted approach to obtaining blood cultures in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree to compare 2 approaches to ordering blood cultures in children hospitalized with CAP: obtaining blood cultures in all children admitted with CAP (universal approach) and obtaining blood cultures in patients identified as high risk for bacteremia (targeted approach). We searched the literature to determine expected proportions of high-risk patients, positive culture rates, and predicted bacteria and susceptibility patterns. Our primary clinical outcome was projected rate of missed bacteremia with associated treatment failure in the targeted approach. Costs per 100 patients and annualized costs on the national level were calculated for each approach. RESULTS: The model predicts that in the targeted approach, there will be 0.07 cases of missed bacteremia with treatment failure per 100 patients, or 133 annually. In the universal approach, 118 blood cultures would need to be drawn to identify 1 patient with bacteremia, in which the result would lead to a meaningful antibiotic change compared with 42 cultures in the targeted approach. The universal approach would cost $5178 per 100 patients or $9,214,238 annually. The targeted approach would cost $1992 per 100 patients or $3,545,460 annually. The laboratory-related cost savings attributed to the targeted approach would be projected to be $5,668,778 annually. CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis model suggests that a targeted approach to obtaining blood cultures in children hospitalized with CAP may be clinically effective, cost-saving, and reduce unnecessary testing.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Neumonía/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/economía , Niño , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/sangre , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Hospitalización , Humanos , Neumonía/sangre , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
17.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(7): 3968-75, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24798267

RESUMEN

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a growing health problem, and uncertainties exist regarding the optimal therapy for bloodstream infection due to VRE. We conducted systematic comparative evaluations of the impact of different antimicrobial therapies on the outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections due to VRE. A retrospective study from January 2008 to October 2010 was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. Unique patients with blood cultures due to VRE were included and reviewed. Three major therapeutic classes were analyzed: daptomycin, linezolid, and ß-lactams. Three multivariate models were conducted for each outcome, matching for a propensity score predicting the likelihood of receipt of one of the therapeutic classes. A total of 225 cases of bacteremia due to VRE were included, including 86 (38.2%) cases of VR Enterococcus faecalis and 139 (61.8%) of VR Enterococcus faecium. Bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was more frequent among subjects treated with ß-lactams than among those treated with daptomycin or linezolid. The median dose of daptomycin was 6 mg/kg of body weight (range, 6 to 12 mg/kg). After controlling for propensity score and bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis, differences in mortality were nonsignificant among the treatment groups. Therapy with daptomycin was associated with higher median variable direct cost per day than that for linezolid. This large study revealed the three therapeutic classes (daptomycin, linezolid, and ß-lactams) are similarly efficacious in the treatment of bacteremia due to susceptible strains of VRE.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Daptomicina/economía , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Linezolid/economía , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , beta-Lactamas/economía , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
18.
Infection ; 42(6): 991-7, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25100555

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The burden of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is growing worldwide. We aimed to determine the financial disease burden attributable to ESBL-positive species in cases of bloodstream infection (BSI) due to K. pneumoniae and E. coli. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study on patients with BSI due to K. pneumoniae or E. coli between 2008 and 2011 in our institution. Data were collected on true hospital costs, length of stay (LOS), basic demographic parameters, underlying diseases as Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and ESBL positivity of the pathogens. Multivariable regression analysis on hospital costs and length of stay was performed. RESULTS: Overall we found 1,851 consecutive cases of ESBL-E BSI, 352 (19.0%) cases of K. pneumoniae BSI and 1,499 (81.0%) cases of E. coli BSI. Sixty-six of E. coli BSI (18.8%) and 178 of K. pneumoniae BSI (11.9%) cases were due to ESBL-positive isolates, respectively (p = 0.001). 830 (44.8%) cases were hospital-onset, 215 (61.1%) of the K. pneumoniae and 615 (41.0%) of the E. coli cases (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was overall 19.8, 25.0% in K. pneumoniae cases and 18.5% in E. coli cases (p = 0.006). Increased hospital costs and length of stay were significantly associated to BSI with ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSION: In contrast to BSI due to ESBL-positive E. coli, cases of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae BSI were associated with significantly increased costs and length of stay. Infection prevention measures should differentiate between both pathogens.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/economía , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/economía , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resistencia betalactámica
19.
J Intensive Care Med ; 29(6): 327-33, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24019300

RESUMEN

We describe the case of a patient with hemolysis-associated Clostridium perfringens septicemia and review all similar cases published in the literature since 1990, with specific focus on the relationship between treatment strategy and survival. We searched PubMed for all published cases of C. perfringens-associated hemolysis, using the medical subject terms "clostridia," "clostridial sepsis," and/or "hemolysis." All case reports, case series, review articles, and other relevant references published in the English literature since 1990 were included in this study. There were no exclusion criteria. Each case was examined with respect to presenting features of illness, antibiotic regimen, time-to-antibiotic therapy, additional interventions, complications, and patient survival. These variables were entered into a data set and then systematically analyzed with the aid of a statistician, using serial t tests and chi-square analyses. Since 1990, 50 patients of C. perfringens septicemia with hemolysis have been reported. Median age was 61 years (range 31-84), and 58% were male. Mortality was 74%, with a median time to death of 9.7 hours (range 0-96 hours). Of the patients, 35 (70%) were treated medically, while 15 (30%) received antibiotics and surgery. Surgical intervention was associated with significantly improved survival (risk ratio [RR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10, 0.53) as was the use of a combination of penicillin and clindamycin (RR of death 0.46, 95% CI 0.25, 0.83). Four patients utilizing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) have been reported, and all patients survived. In cases of clostridial sepsis with hemolysis, strong predictors of survival include early initiation of appropriate antibiotics as well as surgical removal of infected foci. The HBOT may also be associated with survival. The disease often progresses rapidly to death, so rapid recognition is critical for the patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/economía , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Clostridium perfringens/patogenicidad , Hemólisis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Piperacilina/administración & dosificación , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación
20.
Acta Med Indones ; 46(3): 209-16, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25348183

RESUMEN

AIM: to obtain formulation of an effective and efficient strategy to overcome blood stream infection (BSI). METHODS: operational research design with qualitative and quantitative approach. The study was divided into two stages. Stage I was an operational research with problem solving approach using qualitative and quantitative method. Stage II was performed using quantitative method, a form of an interventional study on strategy implementation, which was previously established in stage I. The effective and efficient strategy for the prevention and control of infection in neonatal unit Cipto Mangunkusumo (CM) Hospital was established using Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach, which involved several related processes. RESULTS: the BSC strategy was proven to be effective and efficient in substantially reducing BSI from 52.31°/oo to 1.36°/oo in neonates with birth weight (BW) 1000-1499 g (p=0.025), and from 29.96°/oo to 1.66°/oo in BW 1500-1999 g (p=0.05). Gram-negative bacteria still predominated as the main cause of BSI in CMH Neonatal Unit. So far, the sources of the microorganisms were thought to be from the environment of treatment unit (tap water filter and humidifying water in the incubator). Significant reduction was also found in neonatal mortality rate weighing 1000-1499 g at birth, length of stay, hospitalization costs, and improved customer satisfaction. CONCLUSION: effective and efficient infection prevention and control using BSC approach could significantly reduce the rate of BSI. This approach may be applied for adult patients in intensive care unit with a wide range of adjustment.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Algoritmos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Indonesia , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones/economía , Control de Infecciones/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA