Female Representation and Position Based on Facts and Members Views in the European Society of Coloproctology.

BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in gender distribution in colorectal surgery across different European countries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate female representation, implicit bias, and members' perception on female participation and representation at the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 annual scientific meeting. DESIGN: This was a retrospective mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted using data from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology annual scientific meeting program and attendees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of female speakers in the formal program and assessment for implicit bias. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women attending the conference, the percentage of women serving on committees, and the results of the online survey. METHODS: Female representation was retrospectively quantified by role, session type, and topic. Implicit bias was measured classifying the introductions of speakers by moderators as formal (using a professional title) or informal (using name only), then further stratified by gender. An online survey was disseminated and analyzed to investigate the members' perception as a benchmark analysis. RESULTS: Disparities were found between sexes, with fewer women attending the conference (25%), serving as session chairs (8%), speakers (21%), and on committees (10%) compared with men. There were no differences across sexes regarding the formal or informal introduction. The survey among our members showed that significantly fewer women felt equally endorsed within the society compared with men (33% versus 63%; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design with data available to be analyzed was limited by the sessions recorded (27/49) and survey respondents (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Female representation within European Society of Coloproctology as chair, speaker, attendee, and committee member was much lower than male representation, both in absolute numbers and relative to membership. Greater awareness of this disparity and inclusiveness are aims of our society. The impact of these initiatives will be determined by reevaluating these metrics at the 2020 annual meeting. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B384. REPRESENTACIN Y POSICIN FEMENINA EN LA SOCIEDAD EUROPEA DE COLOPROCTOLOGA BASADA EN LOS HECHOS Y LAS OPINIONES DE SUS MIEMBROS: ANTECEDENTES:Existe una amplia variabilidad en la distribución de géneros en la cirugía colorrectal en los diferentes países de Europa.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la representación femenina, el sesgo implícito y la percepción de los miembros sobre la participación y representación femenina en el 12° Congreso científico anual de la Sociedad Europea de Coloproctología.DESIGN:Este fué un estudio observacional retrospectivo de métodos mixtos transversales.AJUSTES:Los análisis se realizaron utilizando los datos del programa cintífico de la reunión y los datos de los presentes en el Congreso de la ESCP en 2017.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADOS:La principal medida en el resultado fue el porcentaje de disertantes femeninas en el programa definitivo y la evaluación del sesgo implícito. Los resultados secundarios fueron el porcentaje de mujeres que asistieron a la conferencia, trabajaron en los comités y los resultados de la encuesta informática.METODOS:La representación femenina se cuantificó retrospectivamente según el rol, tipo de sesión y temas. Se midió el sesgo implícito clasificando las introducciones de los disertantes por parte de los moderadores de manera formal (usando un título profesional) o informal (usando solamente el nombre), y luego fueron estratificadas por género. Se difundió y analizó una encuesta informática para investigar la percepción de los miembros como análisis de referencia.RESULTADOS:Se encontraron disparidades de género, con menos mujeres presentes en la conferencia (25%), obrando como presidentes de sesión (8%), como disertantes (21%) y como miembros de comités (10%) comparadas con los hombres. No hubo diferencia entre sexos con respecto a la introducción formal o informal. La encuesta informática entre los miembros mostró significativamente que menos mujeres se sentían respaldadas igualitariamente dentro de la sociedad comparadas con los hombres (33% frente a 63%, p<0.001).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo de datos limitados a las sesiones grabadas (27/49) y a los encuestados (28%) disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES:La representación femenina dentro de la Sociedad Europea de Coloproctología como presidente, disertante, asistente ó como miembro del comité fué mucho menor que la representación masculina, tanto en números absolutos como en relación con la membresía. Crear una mayor conciencia de esta disparidad de inclusión son prioridad en nuestra sociedad. El impacto de estas iniciativas se determinará re-evaluando estas variables en reuniones futuras. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B384.

Consenting for pelvic nerve injury in colorectal surgery: need to address age and gender bias.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic nerve injury is a recognised complication following pelvic dissection in colorectal surgery. It can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction in men and women, which varies from 5-40% depending on the surgery and the underlying pathology. Sexual dysfunction can manifest as erectile dysfunction in men and as dyspareunia and failure to achieve sexual arousal/orgasm in women. The aim of this study was to evaluate consent for these complications prior to surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective audit on patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery involving pelvic dissection over a 2-year period (June 2006 to June 2008) at University Hospital of North Staffordshire. We reviewed the consent forms and medical records of these patients, specifically looking for documentation of pelvic nerve injury, sexual dysfunction or erectile dysfunction prior to surgery. Only patients who had documented pelvic dissection in their operative notes were included in the audit, and those who were deemed unable to consent were excluded. RESULTS: Medical records of 118 patients were reviewed. Of this cohort, 31% were women (n = 37). Malignancy was the indication for surgery in 79% of women and 88% of men. Consent for the procedure was obtained by a consultant in 73% (n = 86) of patients and by a middle-grade surgeon in the remaining 27% (n = 32). Only two women were consented for pelvic nerve injury whilst this number was 41 for men (5% vs 51%). Patients younger than 50 years were more consistently informed of the risks (50%) compared to the over 50-year-olds (34%). Only eight patients (males 6, females 2) were consented for urinary dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of pelvic nerve injury is not frequently stated, which is more common in women and the elderly. Overall, only 36% of patients were consented for pelvic nerve injury, while only 5% of women were consented. Is this professional discretion, or evidence that surgeons are not being assiduous enough when obtaining consent, which may leave them vulnerable to medicolegal claims? Introduction of procedure-specific consent forms would be a method to address this issue.