COVID-19 outbreak and its monetary implications for dental practices, hospitals and healthcare workers.

The novel COVID-19 came under limelight few months back (December 2019) and has recently been declared a pandemic by WHO. It has resulted in serious financial implications being faced by dental practices, hospitals and healthcare workers. Dental practice currently is restricted to provision of emergency dental care whereas, many hospitals have also cancelled elective procedures to save finances for COVID-19 treatment which is expensive and unpredictable. In addition, healthcare workers are also facing financial challenges in this difficult time. Competent authorities should step in to help dental practices, hospitals and healthcare workers in order to ensure the provision of all types of healthcare efficiently in these testing times and beyond.

An RCT on clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of correction of unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift in specialist and general dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the costs of quad-helix (QH) and removable expansion plate (EP) treatments performed either in specialist or general dentistry for the correction of unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift in the mixed dentition. TRIAL DESIGN: Four-arm parallel group multicentre randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift were recruited. The patients were randomized by an independent person not involved in the trial. The randomization used blocks of 20 and into the following four groups: QH treatments in specialist orthodontic clinics (QHS), QH treatments in general dentistry (QHG), EP treatments in specialist orthodontic clinics (EPS), and EP treatments in general dentistry (EPG). Blinding was accomplished of the outcome assessor and data analyst. A cost analysis was performed with reference to intention-to-treat (ITT), regarding direct costs, indirect costs, and societal costs (the sum of direct and indirect costs) for calculations of successful treatments alone and for retreatments when required. To determine which alternative has the lower cost, a cost-minimization analysis was undertaken, based on that the outcome of the treatment alternatives were broadly equivalent, so the difference between them reduces to a comparison of costs. RESULTS: In the QHS group, 28 of 28 patients were successfully corrected compared to 23 of 27 in the QHG group. Treatment with expansion plate was less successful: 18 of 27 patients in the EPS group and 18 of 28 in the EPG group. QH treatment performed in specialist orthodontic clinics had significantly lower costs than QH or EP treatment accomplished in general dentistry as well as EP treatments in specialist orthodontic clinics. LIMITATIONS: Costs depend on local factors and should not be directly extrapolated to other locations. CONCLUSION: Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition is recommended to be performed by a specialist orthodontist using the QH appliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was not registered.

Financial conflicts of interest in dentistry: how much money do providers receive from industry?

The purpose of this retrospective, observational study was to characterize the amounts and types of healthcare industry payments made to dental care providers in 2017. Data were collected from the Open Payments database of the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dentists were classified as providing general services or services in 1 of 9 specialties recognized by the American Dental Association (prior to the recognition of dental anesthesiology). The value and nature of each payment made to providers were recorded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Distributions across dental specialties were compared with analyses of variance. In 2017, US dentists received a total of 321,627 industry payments totaling $110,750,601. The most money was spent on service fees ($37,333,870; 33.7%), followed by consulting fees ($12,983,013; 11.7%) and royalties and licenses ($11,426,776; 10.3%). Each provider received a median payment of $63.27 (range, $0.21-$22,931,027.12) spread over 2 payments (range, 1-285). Participation rates among dental specialists ranged from 19% to 62%, and the highest rates were found among orthodontists (61.8%), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (55.7%), and periodontists (54.6%). The greatest median payments per provider were made to specialists in oral and maxillofacial radiology ($187.52), periodontics ($127.31), and oral and maxillofacial surgery ($123.39). The mean number (P < 0.01) and amount of payments (P < 0.01) per provider differed significantly across all specialties. The majority of dentists in this study received less than $200; however, the distribution of payments was positively skewed by a few top earners. The effect of these payments on clinical practice remains to be determined.

[Sinking your teeth into economic evaluations: application and importance in oral health]. / Economische evaluaties aan de tand gevoeld: belang en toepassing in de mondzorg.

Health economics deals with issues about the use of scarce resources in healthcare. An important branch of health economics concerns economic evaluations, which consist of a comparison of the costs and effects of 2 or more treatments. The role and importance of economic evaluations in oral care are increasing but are not yet as evident as in other areas of healthcare (such as pharmacy). An economic evaluation provides a broad picture of the costs and health benefits of a particular diagnostic or treatment strategy, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio (expressed, for example, as costs per quality-adjusted life year gained). The results are intended for use in policy-making, such as decisions about in- or exclusion from the basic benefits package. To date, only a limited number of economic evaluations of oral care have been carried out, mainly focused on caries. It is important to be able to demonstrate that the treatment provided in oral care is cost-effective. Oral care may put itself in a vulnerable position in the distribution of scarce resources when the costeffectiveness of its treatments is uncertain.

[Costs and financing of oral healthcare in the Netherlands]. / Kosten en financiering van de mondzorg.

In the Netherlands, dental diseases are the third most expensive category of healthcare costs. The total cost of the consumption of oral care gives, however, no insight into the content of the care. Data from health insurers do provide such insight, but due to limitations in reimbursements the data from health insurers represent only part of all the costs of oral care. In this study an attempt was made, by means of an estimation, to gain insight into the total cost of oral care, financed both by basic and supplementary health insurance and by the patients themselves . This estimation was made at the level of UPT clusters and is based on data from the health insurers and a large factoring company for the years 2011, 2013 and 2014. Based on this estimate, one can conclude that on average between 21% and 32% of oral care consumption is financed privately. A complete picture of the costs of oral care is important in determining the contribution of oral care to public health. The structure of the current financial system, however, impedes transparency concerning oral care consumed.

[Health economics and oral care: an introductory anthology]. / Gezondheidseconomie en mondzorg: een inleidende bloemlezing.

Healthcare expenditures will continue to increase in the coming years, raising questions regarding the sustainability of the Dutch healthcare system and solidarity, but also about the optimal use of available resources. Given the issues in the oral care sector, attention for economic insights is appropriate there as well. Relevant issues in this regard are the design of the basic and supplementary health insurance schemes for oral care, the market structure and financing of oral care, questions regarding task shifting in oral care, as well as socio-economic inequalities in oral health. A closer cooperative relationship between oral care and the health economy can help in achieving an optimal and sustainable organisation of the Dutch oral care sector. In other words, an organisation contributing in an efficient and fair way to good oral care for all Dutch citizens.

[Opinions about oral care: an online questionnaire among readers of NTvT]. / Meningen over mondzorg: een online-onderzoek onder NTVT-lezers.

By means of a brief online questionnaire with 12 statements about the organisation, quality and impact of oral care in the Netherlands, the readers of the Netherlands Journal of Dentistry (NTVT) were asked to express their opinions on a number of important subjects concerning oral care in the Netherlands with respect to health economic matters. A total of 237 readers (61% men, 39% women) completed the online questionnaire. 70% of them were working as dentists and had been active in a practice for between 31 and 40 years. According to the study, a shift from curing to prevention was considered to be necessary. Most of the respondents also thought inequality in oral health in the Netherlands is increasing and people avoid going to the dentist due to the associated costs. In conclusion, most oral care providers appear to be reasonably positive about Dutch oral care. Attention for prevention, appreciation of oral health and the reduction of inequality in oral care continue to be necessary.

Dental Economics and the Increasing Hispanic Population in the U.S. and New York State.

The continuing dramatic increases in the U.S. Hispanic population are considered relative to the economic concerns of dental practice. Oral health needs, limited finances and health insurance, together with varying cultural orientation, are reviewed in terms of the potential for growing Hispanic political strength.

[Regulatory framework of the new wage payment system in dentistry]. / Normativnaia pravovaia baza novoi sistemy oplaty truda v stomatologicheskikh organizatsiiakh.

The paper presents the analysis of regulatory frameworks for wage payment system in federal, state and municipal dental clinics. The new wage payment system provided significant freedom for employers in payments size determination by regulation of basic, stimulating and compensative salary payoffs. The study highlights the need for scientific studies on dental care quality assessment criteria for wage payment system.

[Reimbursement of public dental care in Germany, the United Kingdom, Hungary and Poland]. / A fogászati ellátás finanszírozása Németországban, az Egyesült Királyságban, Magyarországon és Lengyelországban.

INTRODUCTION: Dental treatments have the highest rate among medical interventions and their reimbursement is also significant. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of the reformed healthcare system process on public dental services in four European countries. METHOD: Assessment base for the comparison of reimbursement of dental treatments and dental fee schedules provided by the health insurance funds were used. The following indicators were examined: the ratio of public dental services and the main oral health indicators. Among dental fee schedules, reimbursement of general dental activity, prevention, operative dentistry, endodontic and oral surgery were selected. RESULTS: The lowest value of population to active dentist ratio was found in Germany (population to active dentist ratio: 1247) and the highest in Hungary (population to active dentist ratio: 2020). Oral health indicators showed significant differences between the West-European and East-European countries. On the other hand, the ratio of completely edentulous people at the age of 65yrs did not show great variations. Reimbursement of public dental treatments indicated significantly higher value in Germany and the United Kingdom compared to the other countries. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement of public dental services varies considerably in the selected European countries.

New York State Dental Establishments and Dentists: 2007-2012. Economic Survey.

Every five years a series of studies is carried out by the Census Bureau which provides an opportunity to review the basic economic well-being of the many industries at the national, state and county levels. A comparison of dental economic data from the 2007 and 2012 studies for the period that encompassed the 2007-2009 "Great Recession" details the general economic difficulties faced by the dental profession during this period.

Ethics, Economics and Dentistry for Individuals with Disabilities in New York State.

The ADA Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct is an expression of the obligation occurring between the profession and society to meet the oral health needs of the public. At a time of economic concerns for the profession, suggestions are made to bring together the ethics of the profession and the need to expand services to underserved populations, including individuals with disabilities and the poor. The profession's effort to secure economic support for such an effort is possible with increased legislative awareness of the magnitude of the problem. To this end, the number of individuals with disabilities was developed for each Congressional district in New York State in an effort to challenge members of Congress to recognize the need in terms of their constituents, rather than in terms of the tens of millions with disabilities in the United States-which become "just numbers," not actual people.

INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE. A PATHWAY TO BETTER PATIENT CARE, IMPROVED HEALTH, AND LOWER COSTS.

Dentistry usually concerns itself with managing the scope of practice relationships with areas historically performed by dentists as solo practitioners. Many trends in health care-such as electronic records, Big Data, consolidated reimbursement systems, effective but expensive technology, the economies of group practice-are now overwhelming the boundaries of tasks performed in isolation. The Commission on Dental Accreditation has added a standard that dental education programs must prepare professionals to function in these new environments.

Massachusetts Dental Establishments: 2007-2012 Economic Survey.

Every five years, a series of studies is carried out by the U.S. CensusBureau that provides an opportunity to review the basic economic well-being of many industries at the national, state, and county level.-A comparison of dental economic data from the 2007 and 2012 stud es for the period that encompassed the 2007-2009 "Great Recession details the general economic difficulties faced by the dental profes-ion during this period. "While much of the economy has recovered since the Great Recession, the earnings of general [dental] practitioners have not, according to the ADA. In fact, 2014's average earnings of $174,780 for all GPs follow 2013's average of $183,885 and come at the end of a nearly decade-long decline since 2005's inflation-adjusted peak of $219,378"1¹Previous presentations in the JOURNAL OF THE MAsSSCHuUSTTs DENTAL Socimetyreviewed concerns regarding national dental economics and dental practice in relation to population changes in Massachusetts.2,3 More recent information is now available for business receipts for dental establishments with employees at the state and county levels that provides an opportunity to consider economic factors and dental practices from another perspective.

Tennessee Dental Establishments: 2007-2012 Economic Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To document the evolving economies of dental establishments in the State of Tennessee during a period of significant growth of the number of establishments before and after the "Great Recession." METHOD: Published results from the five-year economic surveys by the U.S. Census Bureau on business receipts and salaries of employees (including dentists) for the State of Tennessee and its counties were used to construct a review of these developments. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2012, there were continued increases in average current dollar business receipts and employee salaries. However, in terms of standard dollars, removing the effects of inflation: 1) business receipts increased in 19 counties but decreased in 37 counties; 2) employee salaries increased in 13 counties but decreased in 30 counties. CONCLUSIONS: Results are in line with the reports by the ADA Health Policy Institute, which indicate that nationally the percentage of dentists who report they are not busy enough has increased and dentists' earnings are stagnating. The need is to expand the delivery of care to underserved populations, including the poor, individuals with disabilities, minorities and new immigrant populations, for whom oral health services may not be a priority commodity.

The patient undergoing implant therapy. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015.

INTRODUCTION: The assignment for this working group was to update the existing knowledge regarding factors considered being of special relevance for the patient undergoing implant therapy. This included areas where conflicting opinions exists since long or recently has been expressed, like the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery and peri-implantitis. Also areas with growing interest and concern such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-economy was included in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature in the respective areas of interest (antibiotic prophylaxis, peri-implantitis, patient-reported outcome measurements and health-economic aspects) was searched using different strategies for the different papers. Search strategies ranged from a complex systematic review to systematic- and narrative reviews, depending on subject and available literature. All collected material was critically reviewed. Four manuscripts were subsequently presented for group analysis and discussion and plenum discussions and concensus approval. The selected areas were considered to be of key importance and relevance for the patient undergoing implant therapy. RESULTS: The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. The group's conclusions, identified knowledge gaps, directions for future research and concensus statements are presented in this article. The following reviews were available for group discussions and the foundation for subsequent plenary sessions: Lund B, Hultin M, Tranaeus S, Naimi-Akbar A, Klinge B. (2015) Perioperative antibiotics in conjunction with dental implant placement. A complex systematic review. Renvert S & Quirynen M. (2015) Risk indicators for peri-implantitis. A narrative review. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. (2015) The current use of patient centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry. A systematic review. Beikler T & Flemmig T.F. (2015) Economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses. A narrative review.

EAO consensus conference: economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses.

OBJECTIVE: There are various alternatives for the management of oral conditions that may lead to or already have lead to partial or full edentulism. Economic evaluations measure the efficiency of alternative healthcare interventions and provide useful information for decision-making and the allocation of scarce resources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The current English literature dealing with "cost-effectiveness" of dental implant therapy versus different alternative treatment modalities, that is, complete and fixed partial dentures, root canal, and periodontal treatment, has been included in this narrative review. Due to the high heterogeneity within the literature, a meta-analysis could not be conducted. RESULTS: The available evidence from economic evaluations indicated that for the treatment of central incisors with irreversible pulpitis and coronal lesions, root canal treatments were most cost-effective initial treatment options. When initial root canal treatments failed, orthograde retreatments were most cost-effective. When root canal retreatments failed, extractions and replacement with single implant-supported crowns were more cost-effective compared to fixed or removable partial dentures. In the treatment of periodontitis in molars with Class I furcation invasion, non-surgical periodontal therapy was more effective and costed less than implant-supported single crowns. For the replacement of single missing teeth, two evaluations indicated that implant-supported single crowns provided better outcomes in terms of greater quality-adjusted tooth years or survival rates at lower costs compared to fixed partial prostheses. Another economic evaluation found that implant-supported crowns costed more, but provided greater survival rates compared to fixed partial dentures. For the restoration of edentulous mandibles, two evaluations indicated that overdentures retained by two or four implants improved oral health-related quality of life outcomes, but costed more than complete dentures. CONCLUSIONS: To better assess the efficiency of implant-supported prostheses in various clinical conditions, more economic evaluations are needed that follow well-established methodologies in health economics.

Providing care to people on social assistance: how dentists in Montreal, Canada, respond to organisational, biomedical, and financial challenges.

BACKGROUND: Dentists report facing difficulties and experiencing frustrations with people on social assistance, one of the social groups with the most dental needs. Scientists ignore how they deal with these difficulties and whether they are able to overcome them. Our objective was to understand how dentists deal with critical issues encountered with people on social assistance. METHODS: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 33 dentists practicing in Montreal, Canada. The interview guides included questions on dentists' experiences with people on social assistance and potential strategies developed for this group of people. Analyses consisted of interview debriefing, transcript coding, and data interpretation. RESULTS: Dentists described strategies to resolve three critical issues: missed appointments (organisational issue); difficulty in performing non-covered treatments (biomedical issue); and low government fees (financial issue). With respect to missed appointments, dentists developed strategies to maximise attendance, such as motivating their patients, and to minimise the impact of non-attendance, like booking two people at the same time. With respect to biomedical and financial issues, dentists did not find any satisfactory solutions and considered that it was the government's duty to resolve them. Overall, dentists seem reluctant to exclude people on social assistance but develop solutions that may discriminate against them. CONCLUSIONS: The efforts and failures experienced by dentists with people on social assistance should encourage us to rethink how dental services are provided and financed.

A macroeconomic review of dentistry in Canada in the 2000s.

OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in expenditures on dental health care services, the number of dental health care professionals and self-reported dental visits and cost barriers to dental care in Canada from 2000 to 2010. METHODS: Data on licensed dental professionals; total expenditures on dental care, both public and private; and mean per capita amount spent on dental care were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Information on self-reported dental visits and cost barriers to dental care were collected from the Canadian Community Health Surveys and the Canadian Health Measures Survey. To compare Canada with other countries, data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) were used. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, the number of licensed dental professionals increased by 35%, with a particularly large rise in the number of dental hygienists (61%). Total real expenditures on dental care, after adjusting for inflation, increased by 56%, while the percentage of dental care expenditures paid by private insurance and through public funds decreased. Mean per capita expenditures increased from $233.94 in 2000 to $327.84 in 2010. Compared with other OECD countries, Canada ranked among the highest in mean per capita spending on dental care, but among the lowest in terms of public share. The proportion of people reporting a dental visit in the past year increased from 60.3% in 2001 to 75.5% in 2009, and those reporting cost barriers increased from 15% in 2001 to 17% in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The dental care market appears to be growing, with increases in licensed dental professionals, total and mean per capita dental care expenditures and self-reported dental visits. However, these increases are not necessarily associated with greater effectiveness in meeting population needs and outcomes, such as equity in financing, delivery and improvements in oral health. Concerns with the financing of dental care and related issues of access may have implications for the future of dental care in Canada.