Small bowel lesions in patients with iron deficiency anaemia without overt bleeding: a multicentre study.

The diagnostic work-up in iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) patients can be challenging when bleedings or malabsorption are not clinically manifest. Lesions on the small bowel mucosa may cause IDA. We evaluated the prevalence of lesions on the small bowel mucosa detected at Videocapsule Endoscopy (VCE) in IDA patients following negative upper and lower endoscopies. Clinical and endoscopic data collected in 5 centres were retrieved. Lesions with a high bleeding potential (P2) were computed, and predictive factors investigated at multivariate analysis. By considering data of 230 patients, the endoscopic examination detected a total of 96 (41.7%; 95% CI: 35.4-48.1) P2 lesions on the small bowel mucosa, including 4 (1.7%) cancers. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was found to be the only associated factor at both univariate (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 2.4-13.4; P <0.001) and multivariate (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7-3.9, P <0.01) analyses. Present study showed that evaluation of small bowel mucosa with VCE allows to disclose a potential cause of IDA in near half patients. The cooperation between haematologists and gastroenterologists in the diagnostic work-up may be useful.

Nationwide multicenter study on adverse events associated with a patency capsule: Additional survey of appropriate use of patency capsule study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The PillCam patency capsule (PC) without a radio frequency identification tag was released to preclude retention of the small bowel capsule endoscope (CE) in Japan in 2012. We conducted a multicenter study to determine tag-less PC-related adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We first conducted a retrospective survey using a standardized data collection sheet for the clinical characteristics of PC-related AEs among 1096 patients collected in a prospective survey conducted between January 2013 and May 2014 (Cohort 1). Next, we retrospectively investigated additional AEs that occurred before and after Cohort 1 within the period June 2012 and December 2014 among 1482 patients (Cohort 2). RESULTS: Of the 2578 patients who underwent PC examinations from both cohorts, 74 AEs occurred among 61 patients (2.37%). The main AEs were residual parylene coating in 25 events (0.97%), PC-induced small bowel obstruction, suspicious of impaction, in 23 events (0.89%), and CE retention even after patency confirmation in 10 events (0.39%). Residual parylene coating was significantly associated with Crohn's disease (P < 0.01). Small bowel obstruction was significantly associated with physicians with less than 1 year of experience handling the PC and previous history of postprandial abdominal pain (P < 0.01 and P < 0.03, respectively). CE retention was ascribed to erroneous judgment of PC localization in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale multicenter study provides evidence supporting the safety and efficiency of a PC to preclude CE retention. Accurate PC localization in patients without excretion and confirmation of previous history of postprandial abdominal pain before PC examinations is warranted (UMIN000010513).

Long-term outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is widely used for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), long-term outcomes for OGIB patients after negative CE remain unclear. Herein, we defined negative CE as P0 (no bleeding potential) or P1 (less likely to bleed), based on the P classification using CE. We aimed to clarify long-term outcomes of patients with OGIB after negative CE. METHODS: This single-center observational study enrolled 461 consecutive patients with OGIB who underwent CE from March 2014 to October 2021 and were followed up for >1 year. We examined rebleeding rates and predictive factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four (49%) patients had P0, and 237 (51%) had P1 findings. Rebleeding occurred in 9% and 16% of patients in the P0 and P1 groups, respectively. Two patients in the P0 group and 15 in the P1 group showed rebleeding from the small bowel. The rate of small-bowel rebleeding was significantly lower in the P0 group than that in the P1 group (1% vs 6%, P = 0.002), as was the cumulative rebleeding rate (P = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, history of endoscopic hemostasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.958, 95% confidence interval [CI]:4.950-51.447, P < 0.001) and P1 CE findings (HR = 9.989, 95% CI: 2.077-48.030, P = 0.004) were independently predicted small-bowel rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: OGIB with P0 CE findings rarely showed rebleeding from the small bowel. Rebleeding may occur in patients with OGIB. Patients with history of endoscopic hemostasis for small-bowel lesions or P1 CE findings should be followed up intensively.

Diagnostic yield for video capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal graft- versus -host disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

BACKGROUND: The gastrointestinal tract is the second most involved organ for graft-versus-host disease where involvement of the small intestine is present in 50% of the cases. Therefore, the use of a non-invasive investigation i.e., video capsule endoscopy (VCE) seems ideal in the diagnostic work-up, but this has never been systematically evaluated before. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and safety of VCE, in comparison with conventional endoscopy in patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHOD: Databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. All databases were searched from their inception date until June 17, 2022. The search identified 792 publications, of which 8 studies were included in our analysis comprising of 232 unique patients. Efficacy was calculated in comparison with the golden standard i.e., histology. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity was higher for VCE at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89) compared to conventional endoscopy 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47-0.75) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.155, Q = 2.02). Similarly, the pooled specificity was higher for VCE at 0.68 (95% CI: 0.46-0.84) than for conventional endoscopy at 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40-0.74) but not statistically significant (p = 0.457, Q = 0.55). Moreover, concern for adverse events such as intestinal obstruction or perforation was not justified since none of the capsules were retained in the small bowel and no perforations occurred in relation to VCE. A limitation to the study is the retrospective approach seen in 50% of the studies. CONCLUSION: The role of video capsule endoscopy in diagnosing or dismissing graft-versus-host disease is not yet established and requires further studies. However, the modality appears safe in this cohort.

Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy performance in aging patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing elderly population and wide use of magnetic capsule endoscopy (MCE) have led to more attention to elderly patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the performance (including transit time, cleanliness score, positive findings and safety) of MCE in aging patients (≥ 60 years), especially patients over 80 years old. METHODS: Consecutive patients of ≥ 60 years undergoing MCE at our center from August 2017 to August 2022 were classified into the oldest (≥ 80 years) and the older (60-79 years) groups. Esophageal transit time (ETT), gastric examination time (GET), small bowel transit time (SITT), and the quality of gastric preparation were compared. Information on examination indications, subjective discomforts, adverse events, and MCE outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 293 enrolled patients, 128 patients were in the oldest group and 165 patients were in the older group. ETT and GET were longer in the oldest group, whereas SITT was slightly longer in the oldest patients. Visualization scores were significantly lower in the body and antrum in the oldest patients. The total visualization score was lower in the older group compared with the oldest group; however, the difference was not significant. Cleanliness scores at the fundus and antrum and total cleanliness scores were lower in the oldest patients compared with the older patients. Positive findings and ulcers and erosions in the small intestine were more common in the oldest group. One patient had nausea during the gastric examination. Capsule retention in the cecum occurred in one case. CONCLUSION: MCE was feasible and safe for aging patients. ETT and GET were markedly longer and gastric cleanliness and visualization were worse, while overall small intestine-positive findings were higher in the oldest patients compared with the older patients.

RHEMITT Score Predicts Rebleed After Capsule Endoscopy: First Validation at a U.S. Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding undergo small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), but often return for recurrent bleeding or anemia. The RHEMITT score evaluates patients based on 7 variables (heart failure, chronic kidney disease, Saurin P1/P2 lesions, major bleeding, incomplete SBCE, smoking status, and endoscopic treatment) and seeks to predict the risk of rebleeding. AIMS: This study aims to perform an external validation of the RHEMITT score in the United States. METHODS: SBCEs performed to evaluate anemia or GI bleeding from a tertiary-care center's PillCam database between 1/22/2018 and 7/21/2020 were reviewed. Variables based on the RHEMITT score were collected. The primary outcome was rebleeding, defined as (1) melena or hematochezia or (2) hemoglobin drop of 2 g/dL. Patient were categorized into low, intermediate, and high-risk categories based on RHEMITT score. The accuracy of the RHEMITT score for predicting rebleeding was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 361 SBCEs were included in the study. Age, indication for SBCE, endoscopic treatment, antiplatelet use, cirrhosis, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and major bleeding were significantly associated with risk of rebleed (p < 0.05). Each increasing risk category for the RHEMITT score predicted increased probability of this study's primary outcome, rebleeding (p < 0.001). There was a significant association between RHEMITT risk category and rebleeding-free survival (log-rank p < 0.001). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the RHEMITT score was 0.790 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings validate the RHEMITT score and confirm acceptable performance for predicting rebleeding at a tertiary referral center in the United States.

First report of complete enteroscopy from ileocecal valve to pylorus by retrograde motorized power spiral endoscopy.

The development of capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) revolutionized minimally invasive examination and treatment of small bowel diseases. Limitations of DAE are a great time expenditure and low rates of complete enteroscopy. Recently motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) was introduced with shorter procedure times and concurrently greater insertion depths. MSE is also the first device that opens up the possibility to achieve complete enteroscopy in a relevant number of cases by the unidirectional, peroral approach.To our knowledge we present the first published case of complete enteroscopy by retrograde MSE in a 35-year-old female without prior abdominal surgery with direct endoscopic visualization of the pyloric ring. The patient suffered from colonic polyposis syndrome. For the exploration of both colorectum and the small bowel we performed retrograde MSE under propofol sedation. After 60 minutes of advancement, we achieved complete enteroscopy by retrograde identification of the pyloric ring. The procedure could be finished after withdrawal of the endoscope and cold snare polypectomy of 3 small colonic adenomas without any adverse events. Total procedure time was 82 minutes. The patient was discharged one day after the procedure without complaints.It has been proven already that great insertion depths are achievable by retrograde MSE, but this case shows for the first time that even a complete enteroscopy is possible. In conclusion, primary retrograde MSE with no need of tracheal intubation might be a key to more effective, time-preserving, and cost-effective concepts of small-bowel endoscopy in the future.

An evaluation of a novel bowel preparation regimen and its effect on the utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel bowel preparation and booster regimen for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) using macrogol, phospho-soda and gastrografin, compared with a control regimen consisting of polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulfate. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using historical controls. Symptomatic patients undergoing CCE between 11/07/2021 and 21/12/2021 using the novel regimen were included. Symptomatic patients who underwent CCE in the ScotCap evaluation using the control regimen were used as historical controls. We measured the rate of complete test (visualisation of the whole colon and rectum), adequate bowel preparation, successful test (complete and adequate bowel preparation) and need for further test following CCE. The rate of adverse events was also collected. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CCE using the new and control regimen were 200 and 316, respectively. The median age, age range and proportion of female patients in the new and control regimen cohorts was 61 vs 60 years, 16-86 vs 20-83 years, and 60.5% vs 56.6%. The rate of complete test, adequate bowel reparation and successful test for the new and control regimen was 69% vs 72.2%, 86.6% vs 80.7% and 60.5% vs 65.8%. Comparing the new and control regimen, 39.5% vs 37.3% of patients required no test following CCE, 26% vs 32.6% required a colonoscopy, 31.5% vs 21.5% required a flexible sigmoidoscopy and 3% vs 2.9% required a computed tomography colonogram. No adverse events were reported using the new regimen compared to 2 (0.6%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of adequate bowel preparation has improved following the introduction of a new regimen. However, further work is needed to increase the complete test rate. A significant proportion of patients continue to avoid colonoscopy following CCE.

Efficacy-safety profile of the video capsule endoscopy in the study of the small bowel: experience over 100 consecutive procedures.

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is currently considered the first-line study in the evaluation of the small bowel (SB). Retrospective study including consecutive patients from 2010 to 2021 in two referral endoscopic centers in Peru, who underwent VCE. Inclusion criteria were patients with middle gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic diarrhea and unexplained chronic abdominal pain (endoscopic studies prior to VCE: normal). We mainly used Pillcam SB VCE (Given Imaging, Israel) SB2 and SB3 generations.

[Construction of a prediction model for predicting rebleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy].

Objective: To explore the risk factors of rebleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) after capsule endoscopy (CE), and construct a model to predict rebleeding. Methods: The data of patients with OGIB who underwent CE in Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University from July 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up data were obtained via electronic medical records or telephone interviews. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were performed to figure out the risk factors of rebleeding in OGIB patients. Then the optimal prediction model was determined and presented as a nomogram. The model was evaluated by C statistic, calibration curve and decision curve analysis. Results: One hundred and thirty patients with OGIB were included, including 64 females and 66 males, aged (55.8±17.2) years (18-87 years), and 39 (30.0%) cases developed rebleeding during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression model analysis showed the duration of more than 2 weeks OGIB (HR=3.70, 95%CI: 1.85-7.42, P<0.001), a history of previous gastrointestinal bleeding (HR=5.25, 95%CI: 2.00-13.81, P<0.001), positive CE findings (HR=3.72, 95%CI: 1.66-8.33, P=0.001), and the lowest hemoglobin level before CE<80 g/L (HR=2.00, 95%CI: 1.02-3.84, P=0.044) were risk factors for rebleeding, while specific treatment (HR=0.25, 95%CI: 0.11-0.54, P<0.001) was a protective factor. The corresponding scores of the above five predictive factors were: OGIB duration>2 weeks: 79 points; Previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding: 100 points; The result of CE was positive: 79 points; Specific treatment:-85 points; Minimum hemoglobin before CE<80 g/L: 41 points. The prediction model constructed from the above five variables had good discriminative capability (concordance index=0.798, 95%CI: 0.732-0.865). The calibration curves showed high consistency between nomogram-predicted probabilities and actual observations. The decision curves showed that when the threshold probability was above 0.04, the use of the nomogram to predict rebleeding provided a greater net benefit than the assumption of "all patients rebleeding or no patients rebleeding". Conclusion: The prediction model established in this study has a good ability to predic rebleeding in patients with OGIB after CE examination.

[Usefulness and safety of observing anorectal lesions by colon capsule endoscopy].

We investigated the findings of rectoanal lesions in 190 patients who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) at our hospital. Internal hemorrhoids were observed in 70 (36.8%) patients and rectal polyps in 19 (10%) patients. When conventional endoscopy (colonoscopy and double balloon endoscopy) was considered the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of rectal polyps were 75% and 93.4%, respectively, and those of internal hemorrhoids were 88.9% and 92.7%, respectively. The prevalence of constipation was significantly higher in the false-negative group for internal hemorrhoids, and the colonic transit time was significantly shorter in the false-negative and false-positive groups for rectal polyps. No adverse events occurred in any of the patients. CCE might be a useful and safe examination method for rectoanal lesions.

Long-term rebleeding rate and predictive factors of rebleeding after capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The incidence of rebleeding in obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) remains unclear. This study used capsule endoscopy (CE) to determine the long-term rebleeding rate and predictive factors for rebleeding in patients with OGIB. METHODS: This single-center, observational study enrolled consecutive patients with OGIB who underwent CE as the first small intestinal examination between March 2004 and December 2015 and were followed up through medical records or letters. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Survival curve analysis showed that the overall cumulative rebleeding rate in OGIB during the 5 years was 41.7%. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that overt OGIB (hazard ratio [HR], 2.017; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.299-3.131; P = .002), anticoagulants (HR, 1.930; 95% CI, 1.093-3.410; P = .023), positive balloon-assisted enteroscopy findings after CE (HR, 2.927; 95% CI, 1.791-4.783; P < .001), and iron supplements without therapeutic intervention (HR, 2.202; 95% CI, 1.386-3.498; P = .001) were associated with rebleeding, whereas a higher minimum hemoglobin level (HR, .902; 95% CI, .834-.975; P = .009) and therapeutic intervention (HR, .288; 95% CI, .145-.570; P < .001) significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding. Among the Charlson Comorbidity Index components, liver cirrhosis was an independent predictor associated with rebleeding in patients with OGIB (HR, 4.362; 95% CI, 2.622-7.259; P < .001) and in patients with negative CE findings (HR, 8.961; 95% CI, 4.424-18.150; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding is common during the long-term follow-up of patients with OGIB. Careful follow-up is required for patients with liver cirrhosis or previous massive bleeding.

Direct oral anticoagulants are associated with potentially bleeding lesions in suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) became a widespread alternative in anticoagulant therapy. Nevertheless, concerns are raised about their safety, with increased gastrointestinal bleeding rates being described. There are scarce studies regarding DOACs effect on small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) findings. We aimed to assess if the detection of lesions with high bleeding potential on SBCE was significantly different in patients treated with DOACs when compared to non-anticoagulated patients and to patients anticoagulated with other agents. METHODS: Cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent SBCE for suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB) in 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: From 148 patients, 38 (25.7%) were anticoagulated, of which 26 (68.4%) with DOACs. P2 lesions were detected in 36.5% (n = 54) of the patients. These lesions were more frequently detected in patients under DOACs treatment when compared to non-anticoagulated patients (69.2% vs. 29.1%; p=.001), and also when compared to patients treated with other anticoagulants (69.2% vs. 33.3%; p=.037). No differences in P2 lesions detection were observed between patients treated with other anticoagulants and non-anticoagulated patients (33.3% vs. 29.1%; p=.747). In multivariate analysis, DOACs usage was significantly associated with higher detection rates of P2 lesions on SBCE, when adjusted for classical risk factors for MGIB (OR: 3.38; 95%CI = 1.23-9.26; p=.018). CONCLUSIONS: Despite their undeniable cardiovascular benefits and easy applicability, DOACs should still be considered with caution. These drugs were significantly associated with higher risk of potentially bleeding lesions on SBCE when compared to other anticoagulants and represent an independent risk factor for MGIB when adjusted for other variables.

Diagnostic yield of inpatient capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a novel approach to evaluate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Yet CE is not routinely utilized in the inpatient setting for a variety of reasons. We sought to identify factors that predict complete CE and diagnostically meaningful CE, as well as assess the impact of inpatient CE on further hospital management.1 na d2 METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing inpatient CE at a tertiary referral, academic center over a 3 year period. We analyzed data on patient demographics, medical history, endoscopic procedures, hospital course, and results of CE. The primary outcome was complete CE and the secondary outcome was positive findings of pathology on CE. RESULTS: 131 patients were included (56.5% were men 43.5% women, median age of 71.0 years). Overall, CE was complete in 77.1% of patients. Complete CE was not related to motility risk factors, gender, or administration modality. Patients with incomplete CE tended to be older, have lower BMI, and Caucasian, however results did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06; p = 0.06; p = 0.08 respectively). Positive CE was noted in 73.3% of patients, with 35.1% of all patients having active bleeding. Positive CE was not associated with AVM risk factors or medication use. 28.0% of patients underwent subsequent hospital procedures, among which 67.6% identified the same pathology seen on CE. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous studies, we found the majority of inpatient CEs were complete and positive for pathology. We found high rates of correlation between CE and subsequent procedures. The use of CE in the inpatient setting helps to guide the diagnosis and treatment of hospitalized patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

RHEMITT score: Predicting the risk of mid gastrointestinal rebleeding after small bowel capsule endoscopy: A prospective validation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The RHEMITT score (Renal disease; Heart failure; Endoscopic findings; Major bleeding; Incomplete SBCE; Tobacco; Treatment by enteroscopy) was the first score to accurately predict the individual risk of small bowel rebleeding after capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of the study is on the prospective validation of the RHEMITT score. METHODS: Cohort of consecutive patients with mid-gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB) submitted to SBCE and followed prospectively, during at least 12 months, since 2017 until 2020. Rebleeding was defined as an overt bleeding event (melena or hematochezia) or a hemoglobin decrease of at least 2 g/dL. The RHEMITT score was calculated for each patient and the rebleeding rates compared. The performance of the score was tested by calculating the area under curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve. A rebleeding-free survival was assessed, corresponding to the period between the date of SBCE and the date of the first post-SBCE rebleeding event. RESULTS: We included 162 patients, 102 (62.9%) were female, with a mean age of 64 years old. The sensitivities and specificities of the score grades for predicting rebleeding were as following: for low-risk patients, 0% (0-10%) and 28.8% (21.1-36.5%); for intermediate-risk patients, 23.3% (8.2-38.4%) and 72% (64.3-79.7%); for high-risk patients, 76.7% (61.6-91.8%) and 99.2% (97.7-100%), corresponding to an area under curve of the receiver operator characteristic of 0.988 (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meyer plots were statistically different according to the attributed risk (log-rank P value <0.001; Breslow-Wilcoxon P value <0.001). CONCLUSION: The RHEMITT score performed with excellent discriminative power in predicting rebleeding risk, and we herewith propose a surveillance of MGIB patients guided by the RHEMITT score.

Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Detection Using a New Preparation-Free, Colon-Scan Capsule: A Pilot Study of Safety and Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Current strategies to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) vary considerably regarding safety, invasiveness, and patient satisfaction. A known deterrent for patients is the required bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. A new colon-scan capsule system is a unique preparation-free approach that provides structural information on colonic mucosa intended for detection of colorectal polyps and masses. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine safety and patient satisfaction with the colon-scan capsule. METHODS: Prospective single-arm pilot study conducted at two tertiary care centers. Patients with a pre-scheduled colonoscopy for CRC screening or surveillance were included. Patients participating in this study underwent the colon-scan capsule and colonoscopy. Safety was defined by the occurrence of procedure or device-related adverse events. Satisfaction was based on survey questionnaires using a scoring system 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with the colon-scan capsule was compared to colonoscopy. RESULTS: Forty patients were included (52.9 [5.7] years; 64.1% females). There were no serious adverse events and no occurrences of capsule retention. The most common (12.5%) complaint was self-limiting abdominal cramping. Satisfaction questionnaires were completed by more than 87% of patients, with patients likely to recommend the capsule (score 4.1 [1.03]) compared to colonoscopy (score 2.8 [1.2]), p = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The new prepless colon-scan capsule system is an innovative, minimally invasive technology with demonstrated safety and high patient satisfaction. A multicenter pivotal study is planned to validate the performance, safety, and accuracy of polyp detection using the capsule system in comparison with colonoscopy.

Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic delivery of capsule endoscopes in adult and pediatric patients: Multicenter Japanese study (AdvanCE-J study).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We retrospectively determined the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic delivery (ED) of capsule endoscopes. METHODS: We enrolled 10,156 patients who underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), 3182 who underwent patency capsule (PC), and 1367 who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), at 11 gastroenterological and nine pediatric centers. RESULTS: Small bowel capsule endoscopies, PCs, and CCEs were endoscopically delivered to 546 (5.4%), 214 (6.7%), and 14 (1.0%) patients, respectively. Only mild complications occurred for 21.6% (167/774), including uneventful mucosal damage, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Successful ED of SBCE to the duodenum or jejunum occurred in 91.8% and 90.7% of patients aged <16 years and ≥16 years, respectively (P = 0.6661), but the total enteroscopy rate was higher in the first group (91.7%) than in the second (76.2%, P < 0.0001), for whom impossible ingestion (87.3%) was significantly more common than prolonged lodging in the stomach (64.2%, P = 0.0010). Successful PC and CCE delivery to the duodenum occurred in 84.1% and 28.6%, thereafter the patency confirmation rate and total colonoscopy rate was 100% and 61.5%, respectively. The height, weight, and age cutoff points in predicting spontaneous ingestion were 132 cm, 24.8 kg, and 9 years 2 months, respectively, in patients aged <16 years. Patients aged ≥16 years could not swallow the SBCEs mainly due to dysphagia (75.0%); those who retained it in the esophagus due to cardiac disease (28.6%), etc. and in the stomach due to diabetes mellitus (15.7%), etc. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study supports the safety and efficacy of ED in adult and pediatric patients. UMIN000042020.

Video Capsule Endoscopy Has a Minor Long-term Therapeutic Impact on Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia.

BACKGROUND: One of the main causes of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is chronic gastrointestinal blood loss. The use of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) after negative bidirectional endoscopy in patients with IDA is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of VCE in the management and long-term outcomes of IDA patients. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed on all patients with IDA undergoing VCE over a 5-year period. We compared those with positive findings on VCE to those with normal findings. All participants previously underwent a negative bidirectional endoscopy. RESULTS: We performed 199 VCE examinations; median follow-up time was 4 years (IQR 2-5). Positive findings were identified in 66 patients (diagnostic yield 33.2%). Double balloon enteroscopy or push enteroscopy was performed in eight patients (18.6%); only one was therapeutic. The main therapy in both groups was iron supplementation. There were no significant differences in iron treatment before and after VCE in each group and between groups. Anemia improved in both groups. There was no difference in the level of hemoglobin change between the groups during each year of follow-up compared to the baseline level prior to VCE. Anemia resolved in 15 patients (35%) in the positive VCE group and in 19 (45%) in the negative VCE group (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Positive findings on VCE led to subsequent endoscopic interventions only in a small percentage of patients with IDA. Anemia improved and resolved equally whether or not there were VCE findings. The main intervention that appears to help IDA is iron supplementation.

Strange coincidence in the gut: pseudomelanosis duodeni diagnosed by capsule endoscopy and active bleeding due to angiodysplasia.

We present the case of an 82-year-old male with a medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, ischemic heart disease and iron deficiency anemia. He was under therapy with hydralazine, furosemide, amlodipine, valsartan, nitroglycerin patches, bisoprolol, omeprazole, doxazosin, human insulin and oral iron. The patient presented at our institution with melena. Initial gastroscopy showed fresh blood and a gastric angiodysplasia that was treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). Three months later, he suffered a new episode of bleeding and a small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was subsequently indicated.

Oral ingestion versus endoscopic delivery of endoscopic capsule in patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (ORENCES study): A Spanish multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy is the first-choice technique for investigating the majority of small bowel diseases. Its most common complications are related to incomplete examinations and capsule retention. There is no consensus on how patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery should receive the capsule. OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint was to compare the rate of complete small-bowel examinations (completion rate) between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery of the capsule. The secondary endpoint was to compare diagnostic yield and adverse events in the two groups. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in nine hospitals in Spain. Demographic data, previous surgery, indication for capsule endoscopy, intestinal transit time, diagnosis, completion rate (percentage of capsules reaching the caecum), diagnostic yield (percentage of results compatible with indication for the exam) and adverse events were collected. RESULTS: From January 2009 to May 2019 fifty-seven patients were included (39 male, mean age 66±15 years). The most common indications for the exam were "overt" (50.9%) and "occult" (35.1%) small bowel bleeding. Previous Billroth II gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were present in 52.6% and 17.5% of patients respectively. The capsule was swallowed in 34 patients and placed endoscopically in 23 patients. No significant differences were observed between the oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery groups in terms of completion rate (82.4% vs. 78.3%; p=0.742), diagnostic yield (41.2% vs. 52.2%; p=0.432) or small bowel transit time (301 vs. 377min, p=0.118). No capsule retention occurred. Only one severe adverse event (anastomotic perforation) was observed in the endoscopic delivery group. CONCLUSIONS: In our case series, there were no significant differences between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery in terms of completion rate, diagnostic yield or safety. Being less invasive, oral ingestion of the capsule should be the first-choice method in patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery.