Migration of ingested sharp foreign body into the bronchus: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Foreign body ingestion is a common emergence in gastroenterology. Foreign bodies are most likely to be embedded in the esophagus. The sharp ones may penetrate the esophageal wall and lead to serious complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Chinese female was admitted to our hospital with a 4-day history of retrosternal pain and a growing cough after eating fish. Chest computed tomography scan indicated that a high-density foreign body (a fish bone) penetrated through the esophageal wall and inserted into the left main bronchus. First, we used a rigid esophagoscope to explore the esophagus under general anesthesia. However, the foreign body was invisible in the side of the esophagus. Then, the fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed. We divided the fish bone, which traversed the left main bronchus, into two segments under holmium laser and removed the foreign body successfully. The operation time was short and there were no complications. The patient was discharged 1 week postoperatively and was symptom free even under a liquid diet. CONCLUSIONS: There are several challenges in the management of this rare condition. We applied the technique of interventional bronchoscopy to the management of esophageal foreign body flexibly in an emergency. A surgery was avoided, which was more invasive and costly.

An Operable, Portable, and Disposable Ultrathin Endoscope for Evaluation of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A prototype of a disposable endoscope (DE) with easy viewing of the esophagus has been developed. The aim of this study was to develop a new version of DE with improved functionality and to assess the feasibility of DE as a screening tool for upper gastrointestinal diseases compared with conventional endoscopes. METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy and maneuverability of DE were evaluated by comparing endoscopy using DE with conventional endoscopy. Different examiners performed DE endoscopy and conventional endoscopy in a randomized order, blinded to the results. Examiners were asked to respond to a questionnaire about ease of handling and observation using DE in preformed result sheets. Tolerability of DE was also evaluated. Non-sedated participants were asked to respond to a questionnaire about the convenience and satisfaction with DE endoscopy on a nine-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The overall ease of insertion and handling of DE was excellent. The new device enabled observation and evaluation of the entire esophagus with a good agreement between DE endoscopy and conventional endoscopy in terms of endoscopic diagnosis (Kappa value; hiatal hernia; 0.910, reflux esophagitis; 0.949, Barrett's esophagus, 1.000). Participants suggested that they were more comfortable with DE endoscopy than with conventional endoscopy with a lower symptom score (p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: The new DE enabled easy observation of the entire esophagus owing to its improved maneuverability, and its diagnostic ability of esophageal diseases was comparable to that of conventional endoscopes. Non-sedated esophagoscopy with this disposable device potentially has widespread applications in outpatient clinics and areas without endoscopic facilities.

Measuring Barrett's Epithelial Thickness with Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy as a Biomarker to Guide Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment outcomes vary for unknown reasons. One hypothesis is that variations in Barrett's epithelial thickness (BET) are associated with reduced RFA efficacy for thicker BET and strictures for thinner BET. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is an imaging modality that acquires high-resolution, depth-resolved images of BE. However, the attenuation of light by tissue and the lack of layering in Barrett's tissue challenge BET measurements and the study of relationships between thickness and RFA outcomes. We aimed to quantify BET and compared the reliability of standard and contrast-enhanced VLE images. METHODS: Baseline VLE scans from BE patients without prior ablative therapy and a Prague (M) length of > 1 cm were obtained from the US VLE Registry. An algorithm was applied to the VLE images to flatten the mucosal surface and enhance the contrast of different esophageal wall layers. Subsequently, BET was measured by two independent VLE readers using both contrast- and non-contrast-enhanced datasets. In order to validate these adjusted images, intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated. RESULTS: VLE scans from fifty-seven patients were included in this study. BET was measured at eight equidistant locations on the selected cross-sectional images at 0.5 cm intervals from the GEJ to the proximal-most extent of BE. The intra-observer coefficients of the two readers for the contrast-enhanced images were 0.818 (95% CI 0.798-0.836) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.878-0.900). The interobserver agreement for the contrast-enhanced images (0.880; 95% CI 0.867-0.891) was significantly better than for the original images (0.778; 95% CI 0.754-0.799). CONCLUSION: We developed an algorithm that improves VLE visualization of the mucosal layers of the esophageal wall and enables rapid and reliable measurement of BET. Interobserver variability measurements were significantly reduced when using contrast enhancement. Studies are underway to correlate BET with treatment response.

Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

BACKGROUND: Impaired esophageal mucosal integrity plays a role in causing symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Recently, the assessment of esophageal baseline impedance (BI) using the multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) test was suggested as a surrogate technique for the study of esophageal mucosal integrity and was reported to be useful in distinguishing GERD from non-GERD. However, measuring BI requires a 24-h testing period, is complicated, and causes considerable patient discomfort. SUMMARY: Recently, endoscopy-guided catheters that can measure mucosal impedance (MI) and mucosal admittance (MA), which is the inverse of impedance, were developed, and their usefulness in measuring MI and MA for the diagnosis of GERD has been reported. In these studies, esophageal MI values were significantly lower in patients with GERD than in those without GERD. In contrast, esophageal MA was significantly higher in patients with GERD than in those without. Furthermore, we reported that MA is inversely correlated with BI and correlated with acid exposure time. Key Messages: Endoscopy-guided real-time measurement of MI and MA may allow the estimation of mucosal integrity and may be a useful diagnostic tool for patients with GERD in a manner similar to 24-h MII-pH monitoring.

Endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus: What can we learn from the Western perspective?

The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia in Western countries has increased in the past several decades and, even in Eastern countries, it appears to be increasing. Endoscopic therapies are the first-line treatment for BE-related neoplasia; however, there is still no standardized treatment strategy. Most of the data have been published from Western countries where the ultimate goal of treatment is complete eradication of BE mucosa removing subtle synchronous lesions and preventing metachronous neoplasia. A multimodality approach that combines endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely accepted in the West. In contrast, the lack of access to RFA treatment in the East has meant that endoscopic resection is the only feasible option. There is a wide divergence in treatment strategies for BE-related neoplasia between the East and the West. It is very important to consider these basic differences in the context of the currently available evidence to date. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the recent literature and to provide an overview of the endoscopic treatment options for BE.

Usefulness of Non-magnifying Narrow Band Imaging in EVIS EXERA III Video Systems and High-Definition Endoscopes to Diagnose Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus Using the Barrett International NBI Group (BING) Classification.

BACKGROUND: Narrow band imaging (NBI) allows identification of abnormal areas of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and could facilitate targeted biopsies. AIMS: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia prediction using non-magnifying NBI in Evis Exera III processors and high-definition endoscopes using the Barrett International NBI Group (BING) classification, as well as inter/intraobserver agreement for dysplasia prediction and mucosal/vascular patterns. METHODS: Eight observers (4 staff endoscopists and 4 trainee endoscopists) evaluated 100 images selected from an anonymized bank of 470 photographs using the BING classification. Observers were to assign their individual assessment of the mucosal and vascular pattern, and prediction for dysplasia. Accuracy for dysplasia prediction and intra/interobserver agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Dysplasia prediction had an accuracy of 81.1%, sensitivity of 48.4%, and a specificity of 91%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were 61.4 and 85.5%, respectively. Dysplasia prediction done with a high degree of confidence (vs. low degree of confidence) had better diagnostic accuracy (85.8 vs. 70.7%). Interobserver concordance for dysplasia was weak: Κ = 0.40. Agreement for mucosal and vascular patterns was 0.39 and 0.30, respectively. Intraobserver concordance (assessed 6 months after initial test) for mucosal pattern, vascular pattern, and dysplasia prediction was moderate: Κ = 0.56, Κ = 0.47 and Κ = 0.60, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that NBI had a significant accuracy in BE assessment for dysplasia prediction, high specificity (>90%), and NPV (>85%), with suboptimal sensitivity. NBI could be a useful additional tool for BE inspection and targeted biopsies, but cannot avoid the need for biopsies following the Seattle protocol.

Screening for Barrett's Esophagus.

The large increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the West during the past 30 years has stimulated interest in screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to esophageal cancer. Effective endoscopic treatments for dysplasia and intramucosal cancer, coupled with screening programs to detect BE, could help reverse the increase in the incidence of esophageal cancer. However, there are no accurate, cost-effective, minimally invasive techniques available to screen for BE, reducing the enthusiasm of gastroenterologists. Over the past 5 years, there has been significant progress in the development of screening technologies. We review existing and developing technologies, new minimally invasive imaging techniques, nonendoscopic devices for cell collection, and biomarkers that can be measured in blood or stool samples. We discuss the status of these approaches, data from clinical studies of their effects, and their anticipated strengths and weaknesses in screening. The area is rapidly evolving, and new tools will soon be ready for prime time.

Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD) is a rapidly evolving technique for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature focusing on FESD for ZD, including an in-depth evaluation of its efficacy, safety, and limitations. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was completed to identify papers that examined the efficacy and safety of FESD for ZD. Demographic, clinical, and technical information was retrieved. Main outcomes were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I(2) statistic. A random effect model was used as the pooling method in cases of high heterogeneity; otherwise the fixed effect model was applied. Meta-regression was also performed. Main outcomes such as rates of success, adverse events, and recurrences were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty studies with a total of 813 patients were selected. The pooled success, adverse events, and recurrence rates were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-95%; I(2) = 69.5%), 11.3% (95% CI, 8%-16%; I(2) = 64%), and 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%; I(2) = 38.4%), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity across studies was found. However, for success rates, excluding 3 studies reduced heterogeneity to non-significant rates [I(2) = 25.6%; P = .154]. Adverse event rates decreased with larger samples (coefficient, -0.0123; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.003; P = .017), whereas recurrence rates increased (coefficient, 0.006; 95% CI, -0.0010 to 0.0125; P = .093). Year of publication was negatively associated with success rate, whereas the opposite pattern was found for recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: FESD is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for symptomatic ZD, with low adverse event and recurrence rates.

The role of flexible endotherapy for the treatment of recurrent Zenker's diverticula after surgery and endoscopic stapling.

BACKGROUND: Currently there are three main treatment options for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD): surgery, rigid endoscopy and flexible endoscopy. After primary success, recurrence can be as high as 19 % for surgery, 12.8 % for rigid endoscopy and 20 % for flexible endoscopy. Flexible endoscopy may represent an ideal treatment option for recurring ZD. The aims of this paper are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible endotherapy for recurring ZD after surgery and/or endoscopic stapling and to compare the treatment outcome between naive and recurring patients. METHODS: Data on patients that underwent flexible endotherapy for ZD between January 2010 and January 2015 were collected. Patients were divided into those with recurrences after surgery and/or endoscopic stapling and those who did not have previous treatments. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptom severity before the procedure were graded. The outcome parameters were: complications, symptom improvement after the first treatment, number of treatment sessions, rate of complete remission and relapses. These parameters were then compared between patients groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five recurring patients were included. Treatment was carried out successfully in all patients. Two adverse events occurred; they were successfully managed conservatively. After the first treatment, there was a significant reduction in dysphagia, regurgitation and respiratory symptoms scores. The median number of treatments was 1 (IQR 0.25, range 1-3): symptom remission was achieved in 84 % patients and partial improvement in 16 %. Relapsing symptoms occurred in 20 % patients; they were successfully managed with an additional treatment session. Results were compared with data on 34 consecutive naive patients treated within the same time span; no differences of the outcome parameters were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endotherapy for ZD recurrences after surgery and endoscopic stapling appears to be safe and effective, and its efficacy and safety profile seems to be comparable between recurring and naive patients.

Double-scope per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 2010, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has offered an alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. A gastric myotomy length of 3 cm has been recommended; however, it can be difficult to ensure that adequate submucosal dissection has been performed during the procedure. Commonly accepted endoscopic markers of the gastric side can be inaccurate, particularly in patients with prior endoscopic treatments, such as balloon dilation or Botox injection of the lower esophageal sphincter. We hypothesized that the use of a second endoscope would result in a more complete gastric myotomy. METHODS: One hundred consecutive achalasia patients were randomized into single- and double-scope POEM groups. In the treatment group, a second endoscope was used to obtain a retroflexed view of the gastric cardia, while the dissecting scope transilluminated from the end of the submucosal tunnel. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, including myotomy lengths, procedure times, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: POEM was completed with high rates of technical (98-100%) and clinical success (93-97%) in both groups, with a low rate of serious adverse events (2%). The second endoscope resulted in a 17 min increase in procedure time (94 vs. 77 min), myotomy extension in 34% of cases, and an increase in the average gastric myotomy length from 2.6 to 3.2 cm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: A second endoscope is useful for ensuring a complete gastric myotomy during POEM. With minimal increase in procedure time and no increase in morbidity, it may be particularly useful in cases of sigmoid esophagus or otherwise altered anatomy that makes identification of the gastroesophageal junction difficult.

Trans-oral cricomyotomy using a flexible endoscope: technique and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a rare upper esophageal pathology that is most prevalent in the sixth and seventh decade. Three different therapeutical options are available: (1) open trans-cervical approach, (2) rigid endoscopy and (3) flexible endoscopy. Our hypothesis is that a flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy represents a safe and effective treatment of ZD as well as cricopharyngeal spasm. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients that underwent a flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy at our institution between October 2008 and May 2014 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative (1 month and long-term follow-up) symptom scores and clinical outcomes were collected. Briefly, the ZD is carefully identified endoscopically and the common wall is divided using needle knife cautery with the help of an endoscopic cap. Clips are used to close the mucosal defect starting with the apex. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent a flexible endoscopic myotomy for a ZD. Of 26 patients, five (19.2 %) had a history of previous open or stapled trans-oral myotomy and four (15.4 %) underwent a concomitant foregut procedure. Mean length of stay was 1.5 days (range 1-11). Mean operative time was 68 min (range 28-149). One patient presented with a postoperative leak, and one patient presented with a retained clip. Both were treated endoscopically. Recurrent weekly dysphagia was present in 3/26 (11.5 %). One patient (3.8 %) underwent an endoscopic bougie dilatation postoperatively. With regard to clinical outcomes, there was a statistically significant improvement in both short-term (1 month) and long-term (median follow-up 21.8 months; range 1-68.2 months) dysphagia (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), regurgitation (p = 0.001; p = 0.017), cough (p = 0.006; p = 0.025) and aspiration (p = 0.013; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy offers durable relief of dysphagia, regurgitation, cough and aspiration in ZD patients. It appears to have a good safety profile with symptomatic recurrence occurring in up to 11.5 % of cases.

Esophagogastric junction distensibility in hiatus hernia.

Hiatus hernia is known to be an important risk factor for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease. We aimed to use the endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) to evaluate the functional properties of the esophagogastric junction. EndoFLIP assessments were made in 30 patients with hiatus hernia and Barrett's esophagus, and in 14 healthy controls. The EndoFLIP was placed straddling the esophagogastric junction and the bag distended stepwise to 50 mL. Cross-sectional areas of the bag and intra-bag pressures were recorded continuously. Measurements were made in the separate sphincter components and hiatus hernia cavity. EndoFLIP measured functional aspects such as sphincter distensibility and pressure of all esophagogastric junction components and visualized all hiatus hernia present at endoscopy. The lower esophageal sphincter in hiatus hernia patients had a lower pressure (e.g. 47.7 ± 13.0 vs. 61.4 ± 19.2 mm Hg at 50-mL distension volume) and was more distensible (all P < 0.001) than the common esophagogastric junction in controls. In hiatus hernia patients, the crural diaphragm had a lower pressure (e.g. 29.6 ± 10.1 vs. 47.7 ± 13.0 mm Hg at 50-mL distension volume) and was more distensible (all P < 0.001) than the lower esophageal sphincter. There was a significant association between symptom scores in patients and EndoFLIP assessment. Conclusively, EndoFLIP was a useful tool. To evaluate the presence of a hiatus hernia and to measure the functional properties of the esophagogastric junction. Furthermore, EndoFLIP distinguished the separate esophagogastric junction components in hiatus hernia patients, and may help us understand the biomechanics of the esophagogastric junction and the mechanisms behind hiatal herniation.

Esophageal covered stent fixation using an endoscopic over-the-scope clip. Mechanical proof of the concept and first clinical experience.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic suturing reduces stent migration, but is challenging and time-consuming. We compare endoscopic suturing versus anchoring with a novel over-the-scope clip (Padlock) to fix esophageal stents. Additionally, the first clinical case of Padlock stent fixation is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fully covered esophageal stent was placed in 11 pigs and fixed with one figure-of-eight suture (n = 5) or with a Padlock (n = 4) or not fixed (controls; n = 2). The force required to mobilize the stent was recorded. CLINICAL CASE: an esophageal stent was fixed with a Padlock and endoscopically removed 1 month later, in an 82-year-old patient. RESULTS: Mean force (newton) to mobilize the stent was similar after suturing and Padlock fixation (23.99 ± 14.91 vs. 19.97 ± 7.62; p = 0.32). In controls was 7 and 11 Newtons. Suturing time (seconds) was longer than Padlock application (455.4 ± 144.83 vs. 155 ± 12.9; p = 0.002). CLINICAL CASE: stent fixation was feasible and uncomplicated. Removal was easy, and only mild bleeding occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Padlock is faster than endoscopic suturing and achieves similar stent fixation. The first clinical case confirms the feasibility of the method.

Comparison of electrical current and ultrasonic device for incision of the septum of the pharyngoesophageal diverticulum in a pig model.

BACKGROUND: Complications of endoscopic treatment of pharyngoesophageal diverticulum (PED) such as bleeding and perforation occur in up to 15 % of cases. Our objective was to compare incision of the PED septum using the ultrasonic device (group H) with incision using electrical current (group M) in a pig model. METHODS: Twenty domestic pigs were divided into groups H and M. The incision of the PED septum was performed using the ultrasonic device or using electrical current, respectively. The procedural time, complication rate, length of the border of the incised septum, and thermal tissue damage were compared between groups. RESULTS: Mean time to divide the septum and total procedure time were significantly shorter in group H. Mean length of the border of the incised septum was significantly higher in group H. The lateral thermal spread caused by electrical current (group M) was more intense. Hemorrhage was exclusively observed in group M. CONCLUSION: Experimental endoscopic diverticulotomy using ultrasonic device was faster and caused less tissue damage when compared to electrical current.

Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker's diverticulum with the SB Knife. Preliminary results from a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Flexible endoscopic septum division is becoming a prominent treatment option for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Over the years, various techniques have been developed and many cutting tools have been tested with varying results. We report our experience with a recently designed, monopolar, rotating, scissor-shaped device (SB Knife). METHODS: Data on 31 consecutive patients that underwent flexible endoscopic treatment for ZD with the use of the SB Knife were retrieved. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptom severity before the procedure were graded. Procedure duration, rate of complications, symptom changes after the procedure and rate of relapsing patients during follow up were recorded. RESULTS: The procedure was carried out successfully in all patients. Median procedure time was 14 min. One case of late-onset bleeding developed 1 week after the procedure, and was managed endoscopically. A significant symptom improvement was achieved (dysphagia: median score <3, median score >0, P < 0.001; regurgitation: median score <2, median score >0, P < 0.001; respiratory symptoms: median score <2, median score >0, P = 0.009). Two patients had mild relapsing symptoms, respectively, after 4 and 9 months from the procedure but refused further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of ZD using this new device is safe and efficient at short term follow up. No perforations were observed and there was a substantial reduction of symptoms after the treatment. Larger studies are needed to fully assess advantages of this new device for endoscopic treatment of ZD.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma with white opaque substance observed by magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging.

White opaque substance (WOS) is observed in the gastric neoplasia of 0-IIa type using magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI-ME). Colonic and duodenal neoplasms with WOS have also been reported. Immunohistochemical examination with adipophilin reveals WOS in gastric neoplasms as lipid droplets, and WOS is specific for neoplasm with intestinal or gastrointestinal phenotype. We herein report a case of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with WOS. A male patient in his sixties was found by esophagogastroduodenoscopy to have an esophageal elevated lesion. NBI-ME showed whitish deposits that looked similar to WOS in gastric neoplasms. The patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection and the lesion was resected in a single piece. This tumor had diffuse positivity for adipophilin and gastrointestinal phenotype.

Diagnosis and staging of superficial esophageal precursor based on pre-endoscopic resection system comparable to endoscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatments for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the esophageal neoplasm are two types: endoscopic resection (ER) and ablation. Resection enables evaluation of the lesion in the ER specimens, while ablation cannot. We sought to establish a pre-ER evaluated system with a diagnostic and staging accuracy similar to ER for the development of ablation therapy. METHODS: In our study, we collected data pertaining to early esophageal cancer and esophageal neoplasm treated with ER, analyzed the pre- and post-ER data of the lesions and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of pre-ER system compared with the gold standard. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy rate was 91% based on the pre-ER system compared with the gold standard, and 93% based on the ER diagnosis. The AUC of the pre-ER system was 0.964, while the ER examination was 0.971. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the accuracy of pre-ER system was comparable to ER. The pre-ER system enables prediction of histological diagnosis and stage of the lesions, and the choice of treatment for superficial esophageal neoplasm.

Esophageal stricture induced by an ultraslim upper endoscope in a novel rabbit model of corrosive injury.

OBJECTIVE: Benign esophageal strictures are regularly encountered problems in clinical practice. The management of refractory benign esophageal stricture, which fails to establish adequate food passage despite multiple dilatation sessions, has been considered challenging. Experimental animal models are essential for the development of effective treatment methods. The aim of this study was to establish a new animal model of benign esophageal stricture using rabbits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Corrosive injury of the esophagus was induced by administration of 1 ml of 1.5% sodium hydroxide in eight rabbits using an ultraslim upper endoscope equipped with a 5-Fr polytetrafluoroethylene tube and 5-Fr balloon catheter. Two weeks after corrosive injury, endoscopic examination was performed to confirm the state of the injury site. Four weeks after corrosive injury, the esophageal stricture was assessed by endoscopy and esophagography. All animals were then euthanized. RESULTS: Two weeks after corrosive injury, endoscopic examination showed that ulceration had been induced. Four weeks after corrosive injury, endoscopic, radiologic and gross examinations showed that esophageal stricture had been induced without complications in all animals. The esophageal lumen diameter was reduced by an average of 51.8% (range, 48.3%-57.2%), and the mean stricture length was 25.7 mm (range, 20.1-29.3 mm). Microscopic examination revealed focal ulceration and submucosal thickening secondary to fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Rabbit esophageal stricture induced by endoscopic delivery of a small amount of low-concentration sodium hydroxide is a relatively simple, safe, and reproducible animal model. This model may be useful in the development of new treatment methods for esophageal stricture.

Use of flexible esophagoscopy by otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVES: We used questionnaires to determine current practice patterns for esophagoscopy by otolaryngologists in the United States, with attention to foreign body management. METHODS: A 10-item questionnaire designed to determine the prevalence of flexible esophagoscopy use among otolaryngologists, with a particular focus on foreign body removal, was created and sent via e-mail to all members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. A second, 6-question survey to assess the level of resident training in flexible esophagoscopy was similarly created and sent to all directors of US otolaryngology residency programs. RESULTS: There were a total of 160 respondents to the first survey from all geographic regions, most of whom were in group private practice. Overall, only 21.3% of the respondents were trained to perform flexible esophagoscopy during residency, whereas 43% of those who graduated after 1990 received this training. Most respondents performed flexible esophagoscopy without sedation in the office setting. The most common indications were evaluation of dysphagia, screening for complications of laryngopharyngeal reflux, and panendoscopy for head and neck cancer. Nearly 70% of the respondents were either primarily responsible for foreign body management at their institution or shared this responsibility with a gastroenterology department. Eighty-four percent used the rigid esophagoscope alone for this purpose. More than three quarters of otolaryngology residency programs currently include flexible esophagoscopy in their training, which is performed equally in the operating room and in the office; most favor rigid esophagoscopy for foreign body retrieval but use both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a rapid increase in the use of flexible esophagoscopy by otolaryngologists. The majority of residency programs currently include flexible esophagoscopy in their training. Otolaryngologists play a major role in esophageal foreign body management and primarily use the rigid esophagoscope for this purpose.