What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2018. Part 2: systemic therapies.

This review forms part of an annual update series on atopic eczema (AE), where systematic reviews (SRs) are gathered and appraised to provide a summary of key recent research findings. The focus of this article is systemic therapies used in AE, while a review on prevention and topical therapies is provided in Part 1. In total, 17 SRs on various systemic treatments used in AE were first published or indexed in 2018. There is a lack of evidence to support vitamin D supplementation, montelukast and naltrexone in AE treatment. The adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids are the main barrier to their use, and there is also a lack of data to determine the optimal delivery and duration of treatment with them. Of other immunosuppressants, ciclosporin has the most robust evidence of efficacy. Biologic therapies in AE treatment are being increasingly investigated, and to date, the greatest quantity of data and evidence of efficacy relates to dupilumab. The most commonly reported adverse effects are injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis. Other biologics showing some evidence of efficacy include nemolizumab, lebrikizumab and tralokinumab, although further data are needed. There are currently insufficient data on oral small molecules, including Janus kinase inhibitors, in the treatment of AE. A Cochrane review on probiotics showed no significant benefit, and SRs and meta-analyses on complementary and alternative medicines, including probiotics, in paediatric AE demonstrated significant heterogeneity, thereby limiting their interpretation. This summary of recent SRs provides up-to-date evidence for clinicians on systemic therapies in AE.

Use of phenytoin for treatment of tacrolimus toxicity with superimposed sepsis.

A 40-year-old woman with a history of chronic graft-versus-host-disease on immunosuppression with tacrolimus presented to the hospital with somnolence, confusion and muscle cramps over a few days. She was found to have hypertension, hyperglycaemia and acute kidney injury with an elevated blood tacrolimus level of greater than 120 ng/mL (reference range 5-15 ng/mL). Discontinuation of tacrolimus with concomitant administration of intravenous phenytoin led to the successful reduction of elevated tacrolimus concentrations and the resolution of her symptoms. Tacrolimus is metabolised by the cytochrome P (CYP) 450 3A enzyme system, and utilisation of CYP 3A inducers to accelerate its clearance may be used as a successful therapy to treat tacrolimus toxicity.

Evaluation of Montelukast for the Prevention of Infusion-related Reactions With Daratumumab.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are among the most common adverse events associated with daratumumab. IRRs are most common with the first infusion of daratumumab. Recommended premedications to be given prior to the daratumumab dose include acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and a corticosteroid. There is emerging data to suggest that the addition of montelukast to this premedication regimen can lower the incidence of daratumumab-related IRRs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review conducted at a large, multistate health system with several different hematology/oncology practice sites. Eligible patients included those with a primary diagnosis of a plasma cell disorder who received at least 1 dose of daratumumab. The primary outcome was the incidence of IRRs with the first daratumumab infusion. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients receiving daratumumab-based therapy were included in this study. All patients received acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and a corticosteroid as premedications prior to the first infusion of daratumumab. Overall, 46 (33%) patients experienced an IRR with the first infusion of daratumumab. The incidence of IRR was lower in patients that received montelukast as a premedication compared with those that did not (montelukast, n = 25 [27%]; no montelukast, n = 21 [45%]; P = .0371). Patients in each arm experienced similar rates of overall, composite pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and systemic IRR manifestations. CONCLUSION: The use of montelukast prior to the first daratumumab infusion led to a reduction in the incidence of IRRs in our experience.

Montelukast in chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a major cause of post‒lung transplant mortality, with limited medical treatment options. In this study we assessed the association of montelukast treatment with pulmonary function and outcome in lung transplant recipients with progressive CLAD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all lung transplant recipients transplanted between July 1991 and December 2016 at our center and who were treated for at least 3 months with montelukast for progressive CLAD, despite at least 3 months of prior azithromycin therapy. Main outcome parameters included evolution of pulmonary function and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients with CLAD (115 with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and 38 with restrictive allograft syndrome) were included, of whom 46% had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) measure of between 66% and 80%, 31% an FEV1 between 51% and 65%, and 23% an FEV1 ≤50% of best post-operative FEV1 at start of montelukast. Montelukast was associated with attenuation in rate of FEV1 decline after 3 and 6 months, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Patients in whom FEV1 improved or stabilized after 3 months of montelukast (81%) had significantly better progression-free (p < 0.0001) and overall (p = 0.0002) survival after CLAD onset, as compared to those with further decline of FEV1 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.816, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.450 to 5.467, p = 0.0022 for overall survival after CLAD onset in risk-adjusted multivariate analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast was associated with a significant attenuation in rate of FEV1 decline in a substantial proportion of patients with established CLAD, which correlated with better outcome. Further study is required regarding use of montelkast.

Drug interaction between erlotinib and phenytoin for brain metastases in a patient with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Erlotinib, a substrate drug metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme, is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concomitant use of erlotinib and the antiepileptic drug phenytoin, an inducer of CYP3A4, may result in a drug-drug interaction accompanied by changes in the blood concentrations of both drugs. We determined the blood concentration of each drug to confirm the interaction between phenytoin and erlotinib in a case of NSCLC with brain metastases. The phenytoin blood concentration (8.2-10.0µg/mL) gradually increased 3-fold (to 24.2µg/mL) 7 months after the start of erlotinib (150mg/d) co-administration. The erlotinib blood concentration which was maintained at 0.15-0.37µg/mL under phenytoin co-administration, increased 12-fold (to 1.77µg/mL) after the stoppage of phenytoin co-administration. The present case revealed that blood phenytoin increased and blood erlotinib decreased subsequent to the interaction of the 2 drugs in the CYP3A4 metabolic enzyme system.