Effect of gemfibrozil and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of selexipag and its active metabolite in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Based on in vitro data, there is evidence to suggest that cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 is involved in the metabolism of selexipag and its active metabolite, ACT-333679. The present study evaluated the possible pharmacokinetic interactions of selexipag with gemfibrozil, a strong CYP2C8 inhibitor, and rifampicin, an inducer of CYP2C8. METHODS: The study consisted of two independent parts, each conducted according to an open-label, randomized, crossover design. The pharmacokinetics and safety of selexipag and ACT-333679 were studied following single-dose administration either alone or in the presence of multiple-dose gemfibrozil (part I) or rifampicin (part II) in healthy male subjects. RESULTS: Gemfibrozil had comparatively small effects on selexipag (less than 2-fold difference in any pharmacokinetic variable) but, with respect to ACT-333679, increased the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) 3.6-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 4.3] and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) 11.1-fold (90% CI 9.2, 13.4). The marked increased exposure to ACT-333679, which mediates the majority of the pharmacological activity of selexipag, was accompanied by significantly more adverse events such as headache, nausea and vomiting. Coadministration of rifampicin increased the Cmax of selexipag 1.8-fold (90% CI 1.4, 2.2) and its AUC0-∞ 1.3-fold (90% CI 1.1, 1.4); its effects on ACT-333679 were to increase its Cmax 1.3-fold (90% CI 1.1, 1.6), shorten its half-life by 63% and reduce its AUC0-∞ by half (90% CI 0.45, 0.59). CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of selexipag and strong inhibitors of CYP2C8 must be avoided, whereas when coadministered with inducers of CYP2C8, dose adjustments of selexipag should be envisaged.

Clopidogrel Markedly Increases Plasma Concentrations of CYP2C8 Substrate Pioglitazone.

The glucose-lowering drug pioglitazone undergoes hepatic CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation to its main metabolites. The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel is metabolized to clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide, which was recently found to be a strong time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C8 in humans. Therefore, we studied the effect of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone. In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers ingested either 300 mg of clopidogrel on day 1, and 75 mg on days 2 and 3, or placebo. Pioglitazone 15 mg was administered 1 hour after placebo and clopidogrel on day 1. Plasma concentrations of pioglitazone, clopidogrel, and their main metabolites were measured up to 72 hours. Clopidogrel increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of pioglitazone 2.1-fold [P < 0.001, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.6] and prolonged its half-life from 6.7 to 11 hours (P = 0.002). The peak concentration of pioglitazone was unaffected but the concentration at 24 hours was increased 4.5-fold (range 1.6-9.8; P < 0.001, 90% CI 3.17-6.45) by clopidogrel. The M-IV-to-pioglitazone AUC0-∞ ratio was 49% (P < 0.001, 90% CI 0.40-0.59) of that during the control phase, indicating that clopidogrel inhibited the CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation of pioglitazone. Clopidogrel increases the exposure to pioglitazone by inhibiting its CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation. In consequence, use of clopidogrel may increase the risk of fluid retention and other concentration-related adverse effects of pioglitazone.

Delayed presentation of severe rhabdomyolysis leading to acute kidney injury following atorvastatin-gemfibrozil combination therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis is a rare but serious complication of lipid-lowering therapy. Statin and fibrate combination increases the risk of rhabdomyolysis possibly by pharmacodynamic interactions. Advanced age, diabetes, hypothyroidism, polypharmacy, and renal impairment are known to increase the risk of rhabdomyolysis. Management strategies include fluid resuscitation and urine alkalinization. Renal indications such as refractory hyperkalemia, acidosis, fluid overload, or uremic complications mandate renal replacement therapy in rhabdomyolysis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 62-year-old Sri Lankan Sinhalese man with dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with renal impairment, and hypothyroidism who was on atorvastatin; he was started on gemfibrozil and developed muscle symptoms. Although gemfibrozil was discontinued soon after, he presented with rhabdomyolysis with acute kidney injury 1 month later. He needed hemodialysis due to refractory hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and fluid overload. CONCLUSIONS: Rhabdomyolysis is a rare but serious complication due to lipid-lowering therapy with statins and fibrates. Treating physicians should be aware and patients should be warned to report about muscle symptoms after starting statins or fibrates. Rhabdomyolysis may occur with mild symptoms and signs and may occur later, even after discontinuation of the drug.

Model-Based Assessments of CYP-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Risk of Alectinib: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Supported Clinical Development.

Alectinib is a selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Alectinib and its major active metabolite M4 exhibited drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential through cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 in vitro. Clinical relevance of the DDI risk was investigated as part of a rapid development program to fulfill the breakthrough therapy designation. Therefore, a strategy with a combination of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and limited clinical trials focused on generating informative data for modeling was made to ensure extrapolation ability of DDI risk. The PBPK modeling has provided mechanistic insight into the low victim DDI risk of alectinib through CYP3A4 by a novel two-dimensional analysis for fmCYP3A4 and FG , and demonstrated negligible CYPs 2C8 and 3A4 enzyme-modulating effects at clinically relevant exposure. This work supports that alectinib can be prescribed without dose adjustment for CYP-mediated DDI liabilities.

Clopidogrel but Not Prasugrel Significantly Inhibits the CYP2C8-Mediated Metabolism of Montelukast in Humans.

The oxidation of montelukast is mainly mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, but other mechanisms may contribute to its disposition. In healthy volunteers, we investigated the effects of two widely used P2Y12 inhibitors on montelukast pharmacokinetics. Clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 and 75 mg on day 2) increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of montelukast 2.0-fold (90% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-2.28, P < 0.001) and decreased the M6:montelukast AUC0-7h ratio to 45% of control (90% CI 40-50%, P < 0.001). Prasugrel (60 mg on day 1 and 10 mg on day 2) had no clinically meaningful effect on montelukast pharmacokinetics. Our results imply that clopidogrel is at least a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C8, but prasugrel is not a clinically relevant CYP2C8 inhibitor. The different interaction potentials of clopidogrel and prasugrel are important to consider when antiplatelet therapy is planned for patients at risk for polypharmacy with CYP2C8 substrates.

Vorapaxar, an oral PAR-1 receptor antagonist, does not affect the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential effects of vorapaxar on the pharmacokinetics and safety of rosiglitazone. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, two-treatment, fixed-sequence study in 18 healthy subjects. On Day 1, Period 1, subjects received a single dose of rosiglitazone 8 mg. In Period 2, subjects received vorapaxar 40 mg on Day 1, vorapaxar 7.5 mg once-daily on Days 2-7, and a single dose of rosiglitazone 8 mg on Day 7. Rosiglitazone and N-desmethylrosiglitazone pharmacokinetics were assessed alone (Period 1) and after coadministration with vorapaxar (Period 2). Vorapaxar and its M20 metabolite pharmacokinetics were assessed on Day 7, Period 2. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Coadministration of rosiglitazone with vorapaxar had no effect on rosiglitazone or N-desmethylrosiglitazone pharmacokinetics. The ratio of geometric means (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the coadministration versus monotherapy for Cmax (GMR 95; 90% CI 88, 103) and AUC0-24 h (GMR 103; 90% CI 98, 108) were within the 80-125% bioequivalence criteria. The metabolite-to-parent exposure ratio with and without vorapaxar was unaltered. Coadministration of vorapaxar with rosiglitazone was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of vorapaxar with rosiglitazone or drugs metabolized via CYP2C8 is unlikely to cause a significant pharmacokinetic interaction.