Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.348
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Mol Recognit ; 37(2): e3068, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968575

RESUMEN

Enzymes are usually stereospecific against chiral substrates, which is commonly accepted for the amine oxidase family of enzymes as well. However, the FsqB (fumisoquin biosynthesis gene B) enzyme that belongs to the family of sarcosine oxidase and oxidizes L-N-methyl-amino acids, shows surprising activity for both enantiomers of N-methyl-dopa. The aim of this study is to understand the mechanism behind this behavior. Primary docking experiments showed that tyrosine and aspartate residues (121 and 315 respectively) are located on the ceiling of the active site of FsqB and may play a role in fixing the N-methyl-dopa via its catechol moiety and allowing both stereoisomers of this substrate to be in close proximity of the N5 atom of the isoalloxazine ring of the cofactor. Three experimental approaches were used to prove this hypothesis which are: (1) studying the oxidative ability of the variants Y121F and D315A on N-methyl-dopa substrates in comparison with N-methyl-tyrosine substrates; (2) studying the FsqB WT and variants catalyzed biotransformation via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); (3) molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the underlying mechanisms of the molecular recognition. First, we found that the chemical characteristics of the catechol moiety of N-methyl-dopa are important to explain the differences between N-methyl-dopa and N-methyl-tyrosine. Furthermore, we found that Y121 and D315 are specific in FsqB and not found in the model enzyme sarcosine oxidase. The on-bench and theoretical mutagenesis studies show that Y121 residue has a major role in fixing the N-methyl-dopa substrates close to the N5 atom of the isoalloxazine ring of the cofactor. Simultaneously, D315 has a supportive role in this mechanism. Jointly, the experimental and theoretical approaches help to solve the riddle of FsqB amine oxidase substrate specificity.


Asunto(s)
Aspergillus fumigatus , Proteínas Fúngicas , Sarcosina-Oxidasa , Estereoisomerismo , Azoles , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Tirosina , Metildopa , Cinética
2.
Retina ; 44(2): 205-213, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38259182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate if metformin use reduces the odds of developing new neovascular AMD (nAMD). METHODS: This is a case-control study of 86,930 subjects with new diagnoses of nAMD and 86,918 matched control subjects using the Merative Marketscan Research Databases. Subjects were analyzed using multivariable conditional logistic regression to identify the risks of various exposures on developing nAMD. A subgroup analysis of 22,117 diabetic cases and 21,616 diabetic control subjects was also performed. RESULTS: Metformin use was associated with reduced odds ratio of developing nAMD (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98) in full sample and diabetic cohort particularly in patients without any diabetic retinopathy-an effect that persisted after Bonferroni correction. In the diabetic cohort without diabetic retinopathy, reduced odds ratio was observed at 24-month cumulative doses of 1 to 300 g, 301 to 630 g, and 631 to 1,080 g. CONCLUSION: Metformin use was associated with reduced odds ratio of nAMD, particularly in patients without diabetic retinopathy. The protective effect was noted for 24-month cumulative doses below 1,080 g. Metformin may be a novel preventive strategy for nAMD.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Metformina , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/epidemiología , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Metildopa
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(21)2023 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37958597

RESUMEN

Antihypertensive therapy is an essential part of management of patients with preeclampsia (PE). Methyldopa (Dopegyt®) and nifedipine (Cordaflex®) are basic medications of therapy since they stabilize blood pressure without affecting the fetus. Their effect on the endothelium of placental vessels has not yet been studied. In this study, we analyzed the effect of antihypertensive therapy on the expression of fucosylated glycans in fetal capillaries of placental terminal villi in patients with early-onset PE (EOPE) and late-onset PE (LOPE), and determined correlation between their expression and mother's hemodynamic parameters, fetoplacental system, factors reflecting inflammatory response, and destructive processes in the endothelial glycocalyx (eGC). A total of 76 women were enrolled in the study: the comparison group consisted of 15 women with healthy pregnancy, and the main group comprised 61 women with early-onset and late-onset PE, who received one-component or two-component antihypertensive therapy. Hemodynamic status was assessed by daily blood pressure monitoring, dopplerometry of maternal placental and fetoplacental blood flows, and the levels of IL-18, IL-6, TNFα, galectin-3, endocan-1, syndecan-1, and hyaluronan in the blood of the mother. Expression of fucosylated glycans was assessed by staining placental sections with AAL, UEA-I, LTL lectins, and anti-LeY MAbs. It was found that (i) expression patterns of fucosylated glycans in eGC capillaries of placental terminal villi in EOPE and LOPE are characterized by predominant expression of structures with a type 2 core and have a similar pattern of quantitative changes, which seems to be due to the impact of one-component and two-component antihypertensive therapy on their expression; (ii) correlation patterns indicate interrelated changes in the molecular composition of eGC fucoglycans and indicators reflecting changes in maternal hemodynamics, fetoplacental hemodynamics, and humoral factors associated with eGC damage. The presented study is the first to demonstrate the features of placental eGC in women with PE treated with antihypertensive therapy. This study also considers placental fucoglycans as a functional part of the eGC, which affects hemodynamics in the mother-placenta-fetus system.


Asunto(s)
Placenta , Preeclampsia , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Placenta/metabolismo , Preeclampsia/metabolismo , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/metabolismo , Glicocálix/metabolismo , Metildopa/metabolismo , Polisacáridos/metabolismo
4.
Annu Rev Med ; 71: 235-248, 2020 01 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31412221

RESUMEN

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a clinically heterogeneous disorder with multiple contributing pathophysiologic mechanisms manifesting as symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in the setting of orthostatic tachycardia (increase in heart rate by at least 30 beats per minute upon assuming an upright position) without orthostatic hypotension. The three major pathophysiologic mechanisms include partial autonomic neuropathy, hypovolemia, and hyperadrenergic state. Patients often will exhibit overlapping characteristics from more than one of these mechanisms. The approach to the treatment of POTS centers on treating the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism. Stockings, abdominal binders, and vasoconstrictors are used to enhance venous return in partial neuropathic POTS. Exercise and volume expansion are the main treatment strategies for hypo-volemic POTS. For hyperadrenergic POTS, beta-blockers and avoidance of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors is important. Attempts should be made to discern which pathophysiologic mechanism(s) may be afflicting patients so that treatment regimens can be individualized.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Ivabradina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Taquicardia Postural Ortostática/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Taquicardia Postural Ortostática/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Clonidina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Taquicardia Postural Ortostática/mortalidad , Síndrome de Taquicardia Postural Ortostática/psicología , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(11): 1763-1776, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104450

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Antihypertensive drugs are among the most prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine have been perceived safe to use during pregnancy and are therefore recommended in international guidelines for treatment of hypertension. In this review, we provide a complete overview of what is known on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antihypertensive drugs methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed to retrieve studies on the PK of methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine used throughout pregnancy. The search was restricted to English and original studies. The systematic search was conducted on July 27, 2021, in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Keywords were methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy, and placenta. RESULTS: A total of 1459 unique references were identified of which title and abstract were screened. Based on this screening, 67 full-text papers were assessed, to retain 30 PK studies of which 2 described methyldopa, 12 labetalol, and 16 nifedipine. No fetal accumulation is found for any of the antihypertensive drugs studied. CONCLUSION: We conclude that despite decades of prescribing methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy, descriptions of their PK during pregnancy are hampered by a large heterogeneity in the low number of available studies. Aiming for evidence-based and personalized dosing of antihypertensive medication in the future, further studies on the relationship of both PK and pharmacodynamics (including the optimal blood pressure targeting) during pregnancy and pregnancy-related pathology are urgently needed to prevent undertreatment, overtreatment, and side effects.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Hipertensión , Labetalol , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Antihipertensivos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/prevención & control , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Nifedipino , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/prevención & control
6.
Ter Arkh ; 94(2): 259-264, 2022 Feb 15.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286748

RESUMEN

Over the past two years, the entire medical community has taken up the fight against the new coronavirus infection. At the initial encounter with COVID-19, it seemed that this virus mainly affects the respiratory system. Still, with long-term observation, it turned out that the consequences of this disease can be much more severe and associated with lung damage and thromboembolic complications, and be a trigger for autoimmune diseases. According to the literature, after suffering COVID-19, some patients debuted systemic lupus erythematosus, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, developed GuillainBarr syndrome, vasculitis, and multiple sclerosis, and a case of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was described in foreign literature. AIH is a fairly rare disease, the prevalence of which in Europe is 1618 cases per 100 thousand inhabitants, affecting mainly women. It is known that chemicals and drugs (minocycline, diclofenac, methyldopa, infliximab, etanercept), viruses (HAV, HEV, EBV, HCV, CMV), environmental factors can serve as triggers of the autoimmune process in the liver. This article presents two clinical cases of AIH that developed after suffering a new coronavirus infection, which we consider as the initial provoking factor of autoimmune inflammation. Given the rarity of AIH, the description of new triggers is of clinical interest. It may be useful for doctors of different specialties since they faced drug-induced liver damage against the background of antiviral and immunobiological therapy. In the domestic literature, there have not yet been any publications devoted to the debut of AIH in adults after coronavirus infection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis Autoinmune , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Hepatitis Autoinmune/diagnóstico , Hepatitis Autoinmune/complicaciones , COVID-19/complicaciones , Etanercept , Infliximab , Metildopa , Diclofenaco , Minociclina , Antivirales
7.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 10: CD012039, 2021 10 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34628642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the leading preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide. One of the clinical effects of hypertension is left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a process of cardiac remodelling. It is estimated that over 30% of people with hypertension also suffer from LVH, although the prevalence rates vary according to the LVH diagnostic criteria. Severity of LVH is associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and an increased risk of death. The role of antihypertensives in the regression of left ventricular mass has been extensively studied. However, uncertainty exists regarding the role of antihypertensive therapy compared to placebo in the morbidity and mortality of individuals with hypertension-induced LVH. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy compared to placebo or no treatment on morbidity and mortality of adults with hypertension-induced LVH. SEARCH METHODS: Cochrane Hypertension's Information Specialist searched the following databases for studies: Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register (to 26 September 2020), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library; 2020, Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 22 September 2020), and Ovid Embase (1974 to 22 September 2020). We searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials. We also searched Epistemonikos (to 19 February 2021), LILACS BIREME (to 19 February 2021), and Clarivate Web of Science (to 26 February 2021), and contacted authors and funders of the identified trials to obtain additional information and individual participant data. There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 12 months' follow-up comparing antihypertensive pharmacological therapy (monotherapy or in combination) with placebo or no treatment in adults (18 years of age or older) with hypertension-induced LVH were eligible for inclusion. The trials must have analysed at least one primary outcome (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, or total serious adverse events) to be considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors screened the search results, with any disagreements resolved by consensus amongst all review authors. Two review authors carried out the data extraction and analyses. We assessed risk of bias of the included studies following Cochrane methodology. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the body of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included three multicentre RCTs. We selected 930 participants from the included studies for the analyses, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 3.5 to 4.3 years). All of the included trials performed an intention-to-treat analysis. We obtained evidence for the review by identifying the population of interest from the trials' total samples. None of the trials provided information on the cause of LVH. The intervention varied amongst the included trials: hydrochlorothiazide plus triamterene with the possibility of adding alpha methyldopa, spironolactone, or olmesartan. Placebo was administered to participants in the control arm in two trials, whereas participants in the control arm of the remaining trial did not receive any add-on treatment. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect of additional antihypertensive pharmacological therapy compared to placebo or no treatment on mortality (14.3% intervention versus 13.6% control; risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.40; 3 studies; 930 participants; very low-certainty evidence); cardiovascular events (12.6% intervention versus 11.5% control; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.55; 3 studies; 930 participants; very low-certainty evidence); and hospitalisation for heart failure (10.7% intervention versus 12.5% control; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.17; 2 studies; 915 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Although both arms yielded similar results for total serious adverse events (48.9% intervention versus 48.1% control; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.16; 3 studies; 930 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and total adverse events (68.3% intervention versus 67.2% control; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.34; 2 studies; 915 participants), the incidence of withdrawal due to adverse events may be significantly higher with antihypertensive drug therapy (15.2% intervention versus 4.9% control; RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.69 to 5.66; 1 study; 522 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analyses limited to blinded trials, trials with low risk of bias in core domains, and trials with no funding from the pharmaceutical industry did not change the results of the main analyses. Limited evidence on the change in left ventricular mass index prevented us from drawing any firm conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain about the effects of adding additional antihypertensive drug therapy on the morbidity and mortality of participants with LVH and hypertension compared to placebo. Although the incidence of serious adverse events was similar between study arms, additional antihypertensive therapy may be associated with more withdrawals due to adverse events. Limited and low-certainty evidence requires that caution be used when interpreting the findings. High-quality clinical trials addressing the effect of antihypertensives on clinically relevant variables and carried out specifically in individuals with hypertension-induced LVH are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Adolescente , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Metildopa
8.
Molecules ; 26(5)2021 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33652665

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to investigate combined effects of flavonoids (apigenin, baicalein, chrysin, quercetin, and scutellarin) and methyldopa on the expression of selected proinflammatory and vascular factors in vitro for prediction of their action in pregnancy-induced hypertension. The research was conducted on a trophoblast-derived human choriocarcinoma cell line and a primary human umbilical vein endothelial cell line. Cytotoxicity of compounds in selected concentrations (20, 40, and 100 µmol) was measured using the MTT test and the concentration of 40 µmol was selected for further analysis. Subsequently, their effects with methyldopa on the expression of selected markers responsible for inflammation (TNF-α; IL-1ß; IL-6) and vascular effects (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α-HIF-1α; placental growth factor-PIGF; transforming growth factor ß-TGF-ß; vascular endothelial growth factor-VEGF) at the mRNA and protein levels were assessed. It was found that every combined administration of a flavonoid and methyldopa in these cells induced a down-regulating effect on all tested factors, except PIGF, especially at the mRNA expression level. As hypertension generally raises TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, HIF-1α, TGF-ß, and VEGF mRNA expression and/or protein levels, the results obtained in the studied model may provide a positive prognostic factor for such activity in vivo.


Asunto(s)
Flavonoides/farmacología , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Metildopa/farmacología , Enfermedades Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Línea Celular , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana , Humanos , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Técnicas In Vitro , Inflamación/genética , Inflamación/patología , Placenta/efectos de los fármacos , Placenta/patología , Factor de Crecimiento Placentario/genética , Embarazo , Trofoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Vasculares/genética , Enfermedades Vasculares/patología
9.
Lancet ; 394(10203): 1011-1021, 2019 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating one in ten pregnancies. Treatment of severely increased blood pressure is widely recommended to reduce the risk for maternal complications. Regimens for the acute treatment of severe hypertension typically include intravenous medications. Although effective, these drugs require venous access and careful fetal monitoring and might not be feasible in busy or low-resource environments. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of three oral drugs, labetalol, nifedipine retard, and methyldopa for the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy. METHODS: In this multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared these oral antihypertensives in two public hospitals in Nagpur, India. Pregnant women were eligible for the trial if they were aged at least 18 years; they were pregnant with fetuses that had reached a gestational age of at least 28 weeks; they required pharmacological blood pressure control for severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg); and were able to swallow oral medications. Women were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg oral nifedipine, 200 mg oral labetalol (hourly, in both of which the dose could be escalated if hypertension was maintained), or 1000 mg methyldopa (a single dose, without dose escalation). Masking of participants, study investigators, and care providers to group allocation was not possible because of different escalation protocols in the study groups. The primary outcome was blood pressure control (defined as 120-150 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and 70-100 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) within 6 h with no adverse outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01912677, and the Clinical Trial Registry, India, number ctri/2013/08/003866. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2015, and Aug 21, 2017, we screened 2307 women for their inclusion in the study. We excluded 1413 (61%) women who were ineligible, declined to participate, had impending eclampsia, were in active labour, or had a combination of these factors. 11 (4%) women in the nifedipine group, ten (3%) women in the labetalol group, and 11 (4%) women in the methyldopa group were ineligible for treatment (because they had only one qualifying blood pressure measurement) or had treatment stopped (because of delivery or transfer elsewhere). 894 (39%) women were randomly assigned to a treatment group and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 298 (33%) women were assigned to receive nifedipine, 295 (33%) women were assigned to receive labetalol, and 301 (33%) women were assigned to receive methyldopa. The primary outcome was significantly more common in women in the nifedipine group than in those in the methyldopa group (249 [84%] women vs 230 [76%] women; p=0·03). However, the primary outcome did not differ between the nifedipine and labetalol groups (249 [84%] women vs 228 [77%] women; p=0·05) or the labetalol and methyldopa groups (p=0·80). Seven serious adverse events (1% of births) were reported during the study: one (<1%) woman in the labetalol group had an intrapartum seizure and six (1%) neonates (one [<1%] neonate in the nifedipine group, two [1%] neonates in the labetalol group, and three [1%] neonates in the methyldopa group) were stillborn. No birth had more than one adverse event. INTERPRETATION: All oral antihypertensives reduced blood pressure to the reference range in most women. As single drugs, nifedipine retard use resulted in a greater frequency of primary outcome attainment than labetalol or methyldopa use. All three oral drugs-methyldopa, nifedipine, and labetalol-are viable initial options for treating severe hypertension in low-resource settings. FUNDING: PREEMPT (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; grantee of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Labetalol/administración & dosificación , Metildopa/administración & dosificación , Nifedipino/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(4): 525-537, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199925

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE DATA: Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, although the optimal treatment is unclear. The aim of this network metaanalysis was to simultaneously compare the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive agents in pregnant women with chronic hypertension. STUDY: Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically from inception to December 15, 2019. Both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were held eligible if they reported the effects of antihypertensive agents on perinatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary outcomes were preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age risk. A frequentist network metaanalytic random-effects model was fitted. The main analysis was based on randomized controlled trials. The credibility of evidence was assessed by taking into account within-study bias, across-studies bias, indirectness, imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 8 cohorts) were included, comprising 4464 women. Pooling of randomized controlled trials indicated that no agent significantly affected the incidence of preeclampsia. Atenolol was associated with significantly higher risk of small-for-gestational age compared with placebo (odds ratio, 26.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.61-259.29) and is ranked as the worst treatment (P-score=.98). The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.55), methyldopa (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.56), ketanserin (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.90), and pindolol (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.55) were administered compared with no drug intake. The highest probability scores were calculated for furosemide (P-score=.86), amlodipine (P-score=.82), and placebo (P-score=.82). The use of nifedipine and methyldopa were associated with significantly lower placental abruption rates (odds ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.58] and 0.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.46], respectively). No significant differences were estimated for cesarean delivery, perinatal death, preterm birth, and gestational age at delivery. CONCLUSION: Atenolol was associated with a significantly increased risk for small-for-gestational-age infants. The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine and methyldopa were administered, although preeclampsia risk was similar among antihypertensive agents. Future large-scale trials should provide guidance about the choice of antihypertensive treatment and the goal blood pressure during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Desprendimiento Prematuro de la Placenta/epidemiología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Amlodipino/uso terapéutico , Atenolol/uso terapéutico , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Furosemida/uso terapéutico , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Incidencia , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Ketanserina/uso terapéutico , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Muerte Perinatal , Pindolol/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 222(6): 532-541, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31715148

RESUMEN

Chronic hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease are among the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and death in the United States. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy is associated with a host of adverse outcomes that include preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, cerebrovascular accidents, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and maternal and perinatal death. There are several key issues related to the diagnosis and management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy where data are limited and further research is needed. These challenges and recent guidelines for the management of chronic hypertension are reviewed. Well-timed pregnancies are of utmost importance to reduce the risks of chronic hypertension; long-acting reversible contraceptive options are preferred. Research to determine optimal blood pressure thresholds for diagnosis and treatment to optimize short- and long-term maternal and perinatal outcomes should be prioritized along with interventions to reduce extant racial and ethnic disparities.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Hipertensión/terapia , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Cesárea , Enfermedad Crónica , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Atención Preconceptiva/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Inhibidores del Simportador de Cloruro Sódico y Cloruro Potásico/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico
12.
Bioorg Chem ; 97: 103708, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32146177

RESUMEN

A series of novel α-methyl-l-DOPA urea derivatives viz., 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-2-(3-halo/trifluoromethyl substituted phenyl ureido)propanoic acids (6a-e) have been synthesized from the reaction of α-methyl-l-DOPA (3) with various aryl isocyanates (4a-e) by using triethylamine (5, TEA) as a base catalyst in THF at reflux conditions. The synthesized compounds are structurally characterized by spectral (IR, 1H &13C NMR and MASS) and elemental analysis studies and screened for their in-vitro antioxidant activity against DPPH, NO and H2O2 free radical scavenging assays and identified compounds 6c &6d as potential antioxidants. The acquired in vitro results were correlated with the results of molecular docking, ADMET, QSAR and bioactivity studies performed for them and predicted that the recorded in silico binding affinities are in good correlation with the in vitro antioxidant activity results. The molecular docking analysis has comprehended the strong hydrogen bonding interactions of 6a-e with 1CB4, 1N8Q, 3MNG, 1OG5, 1DNU, 3NRZ, 2CDU, 1HD2 and 2HCK proteins of their respective SOD, LO, PRXS5, CP450, MP, XO, NO, PRY5 and HCK enzymes. This has sustained the effective binding of 6a-e and resulted in functional inhibition of selective aminoacid residues to be pronounced as multiple molecular targets mediated antioxidant potent compounds. In addition, the evaluated toxicology risks of 6a-e are identified with in the potential limits of drug candidates. The conformational analysis of 6c & 6d prominently infers that urea moiety uniting α-methyl-l-DOPA with halo substituted aryl units into a distinctive orientation to comply good structure-activity to inhibit the proliferation of reactive oxygen species in vivo.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/química , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Metildopa/análogos & derivados , Metildopa/farmacología , Urea/análogos & derivados , Urea/farmacología , Animales , Antioxidantes/farmacocinética , Células CACO-2 , Perros , Humanos , Células de Riñón Canino Madin Darby , Metildopa/farmacocinética , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa , Urea/farmacocinética
13.
Mikrochim Acta ; 187(4): 240, 2020 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32198661

RESUMEN

A fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based in situ fluorescence signal amplification strategy is described for the determination of tyrosinase (TYR). In this assay, a dual-templated copper nanocluster (CuNCs) stabilized by bovine serum albumin (BSA) and glycylglycine (Gly-Gly) was used as an energy donor. Metyrosine was employed as a TYR substrate because its enzyme catalytic product (methyldopa) was able to function as a monomer molecule to form fluorescent polymethyldopa (PMeDP) with the assistance of BSA/Gly-Gly CuNCs. In this process, PMeDP can combine with BSA/Gly-Gly CuNCs without extra modification and then acts as an energy receptor, which leads to a remarkable FRET from BSA/Gly-Gly CuNCs to PMeDP. Interestingly, the fluorescence intensity of PMeDP was strengthened greatly in the FRET-based sensor compared to the separate excitation, which provided good sensitivity for TYR sensing. Illuminated under a UV light source, the fluorescence signal change is observed from dark violet to bright green. Therefore, the present sensing system affords a reliable ratiometric assay for TYR determination. Also, the ratio of fluorescence intensity between PMeDP (λem at 505 nm, F505) and BSA/Gly-Gly CuNCs (λem at 415 nm, F415) was used for quantitative determination of TYR. The sensing system was easily operated in aqueous media with an exciting detection limit of 44.0 U L-1. This sensing strategy has been applied to the screening of inhibitors. Graphical abstract Schematic representation of the strategy for the determination of tyrosinase.


Asunto(s)
Cobre , Fluorescencia , Nanopartículas del Metal/química , Monofenol Monooxigenasa/análisis , Transferencia Resonante de Energía de Fluorescencia , Límite de Detección , Metildopa , alfa-Metiltirosina
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 1: CD000458, 2018 01 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342497

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling movement disorder associated with the prolonged use of antipsychotic medication. Several strategies have been examined in the treatment of TD. Currently, however, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs in TD and they have been associated with many side effects. One particular strategy would be to use pharmaceutical agents which are known to influence the catecholaminergic system at various junctures. OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the effects of any of the following drugs for antipsychotic-induced TD in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.i. Drugs which influence the noradrenergic system.ii. Dopamine receptor agonists.iii. Dopamine receptor antagonists.iv. Dopamine-depletor drugs.v. Drugs that increase the production or release of dopamine.2. To examine whether any improvement occurred with short periods of intervention (less than 6 weeks) and, if this did occur, whether this effect was maintained at longer periods of follow-up.3. To examine if there was a differential effect for the various compounds.4. To examine whether the use of non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs are most effective in those with more recent onset TD (less than five years). SEARCH METHODS: We retrieved 712 references from searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (July 2015 and April 2017). We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of trials for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected studies if they were randomised controlled trials focusing on people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. We compared the use of catecholaminergic interventions versus placebo, no intervention, or any other intervention for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data from these trials and we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assumed that people who left the studies early had no improvement. MAIN RESULTS: There are 10 included trials (N = 261) published between 1973 and 2010; eight are new from the 2015 and 2017 update searches. Forty-eight studies are excluded. Participants were mostly chronically mentally ill inpatients in their 50s, and studies were primarily of short (2 to 6 weeks) duration. The overall risk of bias in these studies was unclear, mainly due to poor reporting of allocation concealment and generation of the sequence. Studies were also not clearly blinded and we are unsure if data are incomplete or selectively reported, or if other biases were operating.One small, three-arm trial found that both alpha-methyldopa (N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80; low-quality evidence) and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.52 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; low-quality evidence) may lead to a clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms compared with placebo after 2 weeks' treatment, but found no evidence of a difference between alpha-methyldopa and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.86; very low quality evidence). Another small trial compared tetrabenazine and haloperidol after 18 weeks' treatment and found no evidence of a difference on clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms (N = 13; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.95; very low quality evidence). No study reported on adverse events.For remaining outcomes there was no evidence of a difference between any of the interventions: alpha-methyldopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; very low quality evidence), celiprolol versus placebo for leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 5.28, 95% CI 0.27 to 102.58; very low quality evidence) and quality of life (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.12; very low quality evidence), alpha-methyldopa versus reserpine for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; not estimable, no reported events; very low quality evidence), reserpine or carbidopa/levodopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (2 RCTs; N = 37; RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.99; very low quality evidence), oxypertine versus placebo for deterioration of mental state (1 RCT; N = 42; RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.22 to 22.45; very low quality evidence), dopaminergic drugs (amantadine, bromocriptine, tiapride, oxypertine, carbidopa/levodopa) versus placebo for leaving the study early (6 RCTs; N = 163; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.54; very low quality evidence), and tetrabenazine versus haloperidol for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 14.92) and leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a large amount of research in this area, many studies were excluded due to inherent problems in the nature of their cross-over designs. Usually data are not reported before the cross-over and the nature of TD and its likely response to treatments make it imprudent to use this data. The review provides little usable information for service users or providers and more well-designed and well-reported studies are indicated.


Asunto(s)
Antidiscinéticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/uso terapéutico , Celiprolol/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Haloperidol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reserpina/uso terapéutico , Tetrabenazina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Tiapamilo/uso terapéutico
15.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD008276, 2017 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28813123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is an important risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events including stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure and renal failure. The main goal of treatment is to reduce these events. Systematic reviews have shown proven benefit of antihypertensive drug therapy in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but most of the evidence is in people 60 years of age and older. We wanted to know what the effects of therapy are in people 18 to 59 years of age. OBJECTIVES: To quantify antihypertensive drug effects on all-cause mortality in adults aged 18 to 59 years with mild to moderate primary hypertension. To quantify effects on cardiovascular mortality plus morbidity (including cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease mortality plus morbidity), withdrawal due adverse events and estimate magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) lowering at one year. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials up to January 2017: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of at least one year' duration comparing antihypertensive pharmacotherapy with a placebo or no treatment in adults aged 18 to 59 years with mild to moderate primary hypertension defined as SBP 140 mmHg or greater or DBP 90 mmHg or greater at baseline, or both. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular (CVS) mortality plus morbidity, withdrawals due to adverse events, and decrease in SBP and DBP. For dichotomous outcomes, we used risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and a fixed-effect model to combine outcomes across trials. For continuous outcomes, we used mean difference (MD) with 95% CI and a random-effects model as there was significant heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: The population in the seven included studies (17,327 participants) were predominantly healthy adults with mild to moderate primary hypertension. The Medical Research Council Trial of Mild Hypertension contributed 14,541 (84%) of total randomized participants, with mean age of 50 years and mean baseline blood pressure of 160/98 mmHg and a mean duration of follow-up of five years. Treatments used in this study were bendrofluazide 10 mg daily or propranolol 80 mg to 240 mg daily with addition of methyldopa if required. The risk of bias in the studies was high or unclear for a number of domains and led us to downgrade the quality of evidence for all outcomes.Based on five studies, antihypertensive drug therapy as compared to placebo or untreated control may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (2.4% with control vs 2.3% with treatment; low quality evidence; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13). Based on 4 studies, the effects on coronary heart disease were uncertain due to low quality evidence (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.19). Low quality evidence from six studies showed that drug therapy may reduce total cardiovascular mortality and morbidity from 4.1% to 3.2% over five years (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91) due to reduction in cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity (1.3% with control vs 0.6% with treatment; RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.64). Very low quality evidence from three studies showed that withdrawals due to adverse events were higher with drug therapy from 0.7% to 3.0% (RR 4.82, 95% CI 1.67 to 13.92). The effects on blood pressure varied between the studies and we are uncertain as to how much of a difference treatment makes on average. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drugs used to treat predominantly healthy adults aged 18 to 59 years with mild to moderate primary hypertension have a small absolute effect to reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity primarily due to reduction in cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity. All-cause mortality and coronary heart disease were not reduced. There is lack of good evidence on withdrawal due to adverse events. Future trials in this age group should be at least 10 years in duration and should compare different first-line drug classes and strategies.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Bendroflumetiazida/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad Coronaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
16.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol ; 44(3): 421-427, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27998008

RESUMEN

Medications used to control hypertension in pregnancy also improve trophoblast and endothelial cellular interaction in vitro. Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibits trophoblast and endothelial cellular interactions and simultaneously decreases endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression. This study investigated whether antihypertensive medications improved these cellular interactions by modulating eNOS and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression. Human uterine myometrial microvascular endothelial cells (UtMVECs) were pre-incubated with (or without) low dose TNF-α (0.5 ng/mL) or TNF-α plus soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) (100 ng/mL). The endothelial cells were cultured on Matrigel. After endothelial cellular networks appeared, trophoblast derived HTR-8/SVneo cells were co-cultured in the presence of clinically relevant doses of methyldopa, labetalol, hydralazine or clonidine for 24 hours. Cells were retrieved from the Matrigel to extract mRNA and eNOS and iNOS expression were examined by quantitative PCR. Methyldopa, labetalol, hydralazine and clonidine reversed the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on eNOS mRNA expression. After pre-incubating endothelial cells with TNF-α and sFlt-1, all the medications except methyldopa lost their effect on eNOS mRNA expression. In the absence of TNF-α, antihypertensive medications did not change eNOS expression. The mRNA expression of iNOS was not affected by TNF-α or any medications. This study shows that selected antihypertensive medications used in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy increase eNOS expression in vitro when induced by the inflammatory TNF-α. The anti-angiogenic molecule sFlt-1 may antagonise the potential benefit of these medications by interfering with the NOS pathway.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trofoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/farmacología , Células Cultivadas , Clonidina/farmacología , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Medios de Cultivo Condicionados , Células Endoteliales/citología , Endotelio Vascular/citología , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Hidralazina/farmacología , Proteína 1 Similar al Receptor de Interleucina-1/fisiología , Labetalol/farmacología , Metildopa/farmacología , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/genética , Trofoblastos/citología , Útero/citología , Útero/efectos de los fármacos
17.
Aust Fam Physician ; 46(5): 296-298, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28472575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When patients suddenly become restless and are unable to sit or stand still, especially in general medical settings, anxiety is often the topmost differential on every clinician's mind. However, the possibility of the very subjectively distressing condition called 'akathisia' should always be considered. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to discuss a clinical approach to the management of akathisia, drawing on the presentation of a patient who was admitted to a general medical ward. DISCUSSION: Akathisia, a subjective and very distressing feeling of restlessness, has been found to be caused by a wide range of medications used in general medical settings, such as azithromycin, antiemetics and antipsychotics. Despite its high incidence and association with an increase in suicidal thoughts, it often goes unrecognised. This paper highlights the need for its early recognition, provides a diagnostic guide and an approach to its management.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Agitación Psicomotora/complicaciones , Agitación Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antieméticos/efectos adversos , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Buspirona/efectos adversos , Buspirona/uso terapéutico , Cinarizina/efectos adversos , Cinarizina/uso terapéutico , Diltiazem/efectos adversos , Diltiazem/uso terapéutico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Metildopa/efectos adversos , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Agitación Psicomotora/etiología , Reserpina/efectos adversos , Reserpina/uso terapéutico , Ideación Suicida
18.
BJOG ; 123(7): 1143-51, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265372

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort. SETTING: International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation. METHODS: Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks. RESULTS: Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85). CONCLUSION: These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There was no evidence that women treated with methyldopa versus labetalol had worse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/prevención & control , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Preeclampsia/etiología , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/prevención & control , Resultado del Embarazo
19.
BJOG ; 123(7): 1135-41, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26259808

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the difference in outcomes between 'less tight' (target diastolic blood pressure [dBP] of 100 mmHg) versus 'tight' control (target dBP of 85 mmHg) in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914, http://pre-empt.cfri.ca/;CHIPS) depended on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa, the two most commonly used antihypertensive agents in CHIPS. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial data. SETTING: International multicentre randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: A total of 987 women with non-severe non-proteinuric pregnancy hypertension. METHODS: Logistic regression was used for comparisons of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control among women treated with labetalol (but not methydopa) versus methyldopa (but not labetalol). Analyses were adjusted for the influence of baseline factors, including use of any antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main CHIPS Trial outcomes: primary (perinatal loss or high-level neonatal care for > 48 hours), secondary (serious maternal complications), birthweight < 10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and delivery at < 34 or < 37 weeks. RESULTS: Of 987 women in CHIPS, antihypertensive therapy was taken by 566 women at randomisation (labetalol 111 ['less tight'] versus 127 ['tight'] or methyldopa 126 ['less tight'] versus 117 ['tight']) and 815 women after randomisation (labetalol 186 ['less tight'] versus 247 ['tight'] and methyldopa by 98 ['less tight'] versus 126 ['tight']). Following adjustment, odds ratios for outcomes in 'less tight' versus 'tight' control were similar between antihypertensive groups according to 'at randomisation' and 'after randomisation' therapy. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for 'less tight' versus 'tight' control were not dependent on use of methyldopa or labetalol. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In the CHIPS Trial, maternal and infant outcomes were not dependent on use of labetalol or methyldopa.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Metildopa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Preeclampsia/etiología , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Luminescence ; 31(4): 937-44, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26542088

RESUMEN

Understanding and controlling the interaction between the polymer methyldopa (2-amino-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-propanoic acid) (PMDP)-γ-Fe2 O3 nanoparticles and biological fluids is important if the potential of nanoparticles (NPs) in biomedicine is to be realized. Physicochemical studies on the interactions between proteins and NPs are influenced by the surface properties of the NPs. To identify the effects of the NP surface, interactions between human serum albumin (HSA) and PMDP-γ-Fe2 O3 NPs were investigated. Here, the adsorption of HSA onto small (10-30 nm diameter) PMDP-γ-Fe2 O3 NPs was quantitatively analyzed using spectroscopic methods. The fluorescence quenching data were checked for the inner-filter effect, the main confounding factor in the observed quenching. The binding constants, Ka , were calculated at different temperatures, using a nonlinear fit to the experimental data, and the thermodynamic parameters ∆H, ∆S and ∆G were given. The obtained thermodynamic signature suggests that hydrophobic interactions at least are present. This result indicates that the structure of the protein turns from a structureless denatured state at pH 3 into an ordered biologically active native state on addition of PMDP-γ-Fe2 O3 NPs. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Biosensibles , Colorantes Fluorescentes/química , Nanopartículas de Magnetita/química , Metildopa/química , Nanopartículas/química , Albúmina Sérica/química , Adsorción , Humanos , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia , Espectrofotometría Ultravioleta , Propiedades de Superficie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA