Measurement of low-grade inflammation of the esophageal mucosa with electrical conductivity shows promise in assessing PPI responsiveness in patients with GERD.

A device that can easily measure electrical impedance might be a helpful tool for investigating the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The first aim of this study was to validate our newly developed bioelectrical admittance measurement (BAM) through in vitro experimentation. The second aim was to investigate whether evaluation of BAM by this measurement differed between patients with heartburn according to their response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Caco-2 cell monolayers and three-dimensional tissues were examined by BAM using a frequency response analyzer. BAM was also used to measure the impedance through cell layers. Subsequently, BAM was performed during endoscopy in 41 patients experiencing heartburn without esophageal mucosal breaks. After 2-wk administration of 20-mg rabeprazole twice daily, patient responses to PPI were classified as "good" or "poor" according to their clinical course. In each patient, histological alterations and gene expression levels of inflammation mediators and tight junction proteins were evaluated. Impedance profiles indicated that monolayer Caco-2 cells on top of eight-layered normal human dermal fibroblasts had the highest magnitude of impedance over the range of frequencies. In vivo results revealed that patients with good responses to PPI displayed significantly higher admittance. Severity of low-grade inflammation was significantly associated with esophageal wall admittance. Moreover, esophageal wall admittance may be more closely related to basal zone hyperplasia than dilatation of intercellular spaces. Thus, BAM may be able to detect abnormalities in the subepithelial layer of the esophagus.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Bioelectrical admittance measurement is a new method to evaluate esophageal mucosal permeability vertically during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Measurement of low-grade inflammation of the esophageal mucosa with electrical conductivity shows promise in assessing proton pump inhibitor responsiveness in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. As various gastrointestinal diseases are associated with changes in mucosal permeability, bioelectrical admittance measurement is expected to be clinically applied to therapeutic decision-making for these diseases in the future.

Heartburn sensation in nonerosive reflux disease: pattern of superficial sensory nerves expressing TRPV1 and epithelial cells expressing ASIC3 receptors.

The underlying causes of heartburn, characteristic symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), remain incompletely understood. Superficial afferent innervation of the esophageal mucosa in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) may drive nociceptive reflux perception, but its acid-sensing role has not yet been established. Transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily member-1 (TRPV1), transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8), and acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) are regulators of sensory nerve activity and could be important reflux-sensing receptors within the esophageal mucosa. We characterized TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 expression in esophageal mucosa of patients with GERD. We studied 10 patients with NERD, 10 with erosive reflux disease (ERD), 7 with functional heartburn (FH), and 8 with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Biopsies obtained from the distal esophageal mucosa were costained with TRPV1, TRPM8, or ASIC3, and CGRP, CD45, or E-cadherin. RNA expression of TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 was assessed using qPCR. Patients with NERD had significantly increased expression of TRPV1 on superficial sensory nerves compared with ERD (P = 0.028) or BE (P = 0.017). Deep intrapapillary nerve endings did not express TRPV1 in all phenotypes studied. ASIC3 was exclusively expressed on epithelial cells most significantly in patients with NERD and ERD (P ≤0.0001). TRPM8 was expressed on submucosal CD45+ leukocytes. Superficial localization of TRPV1-immunoreactive nerves in NERD, and increased ASIC3 coexpression on epithelial cells in NERD and ERD, suggests a mechanism for heartburn sensation. Esophageal epithelial cells may play a sensory role in acid reflux perception and act interdependently with TRPV1-expressing mucosal nerves to augment hypersensitivity in patients with NERD, raising the enticing possibility of topical antagonists for these ion channels as a therapeutic option.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate for the first time that increased pain perception in patients with nonerosive reflux disease likely results from expression of acid-sensitive channels on superficial mucosal afferents and esophageal epithelial cells, raising the potential for topical therapy.

Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic testing for chronic esophageal disorders relies on histopathology analysis of biopsies or uncomfortable transnasal catheters or wireless pH monitoring, which capture abnormal intraluminal refluxate. We therefore developed a balloon mucosal impedance (MI) catheter system that instantly detects changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy over a long segment of the esophagus. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the ability of a balloon-incorporated MI catheter to detect and evaluate esophageal disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 69 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without wireless pH monitoring. Patients were classified as having GERD (erosive esophagitis or abnormal pH; n = 24), EoE (confirmed with pathology analysis of tissues from both distal and proximal esophagus; n = 21), or non-GERD (normal results from esophagogastroduodenoscopy and pH tests; n = 24). Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to compare the accuracy of balloon MI in diagnosis. Probabilities of assignment to each group (GERD, non-GERD, or EoE) were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. Association between MI patterns and diagnoses were validated using data from patients seen at 3 separate institutions. RESULTS: MI pattern along the esophageal axis differed significantly (P < .01) among patients with GERD, EoE, and non-GERD. Patients with non-GERD had higher MI values along all measured segments. The MI pattern for GERD was easily distinguished from that of EoE: in patients with GERD, MI values were low in the distal esophagus and normalized along the proximal esophagus, whereas in patients with EoE, measurements were low in all segments of the esophagus. Intercept and rate of rise of MI value (slope) as distance increased from the squamocolumnar junction identified patients with GERD with an AUC = 0.67, patients with EoE with an AUC = 0.84, and patients with non-GERD with an AUC = 0.83 in the development cohort. One patient had an adverse event (reported mild chest pain after the procedure) and was discharged from the hospital without further events. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a balloon MI catheter system that instantly detects changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy and found it to be safe and able to identify patients with GERD, EoE, or non-GERD. We validated our findings in a separate cohort for patients. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03103789.

Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is complex and involves changes in reflux exposure, epithelial resistance, and visceral sensitivity. The gastric refluxate is a noxious material that injures the esophagus and elicits symptoms. Esophageal exposure to gastric refluxate is the primary determinant of disease severity. This exposure arises via compromise of the anti-reflux barrier and reduced ability of the esophagus to clear and buffer the refluxate, leading to reflux disease. However, complications and symptoms also occur in the context of normal reflux burden, when there is either poor epithelial resistance or increased visceral sensitivity. Reflux therefore develops via alterations in the balance of aggressive and defensive forces.

Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD.

The Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) provided a rationale for acid suppression medication without investigation, thus enhancing the management of the substantial symptom burden in these patients. Increased proton-pump inhibitor use has also highlighted their limitations, with one third of "typical" symptoms known to be refractory. Most refractory symptoms are ascribed to reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH). RH may be caused by impaired esophageal mucosal barrier function and sensitization of peripheral esophageal receptors. Central sensitization may also contribute to the perception of non-pathologic reflux in RH, and the perception of physiological stimuli in FH. Importantly, mechanisms underlying GERD, RH, and FH are (in theory) not mutually exclusive, further complicating patient management. Methods used to distinguish GERD from RH and FH are impractical for use in epidemiological studies and pragmatic care and may have limited diagnostic accuracy. This is impeding accurate prevalence estimates and risk factor determination and the identification of new therapies. Direct assessment of mucosal barrier function by measuring impedance is a promising candidate for improved diagnosis. Ultimately though the concept of GERD as a composite, symptom-based entity needs re-evaluation, so that new understandings of upper GI symptoms can direct more precise management.

Impairment of rat oesophageal muscle contractility associated with experimental non-erosive oesophageal mucosal damage.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Is the responsiveness of isolated segments of the rat oesophagus to contractile or relaxant stimuli susceptible to acute luminal exposure of the oesophagus to an acid solution that contains pepsin and bile salt? What is the main finding and its importance? The study reveals that luminal acidity is an important factor that disrupts barrier function in the oesophagus to allow the diffusion of noxious agents, such as bile acid, that alter the contractile status of the oesophageal body, even in the absence of inflammation. ABSTRACT: We investigated whether the experimental simulation of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux alters the contractile responsiveness of rat oesophageal strips. After 30 min of luminal exposure to a solution at acid pH that contained pepsin and taurodeoxycholic acid, isolated strips of the rat oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction were subjected to contractile or relaxing stimuli. Acid challenge decreased the responsiveness of oesophageal strips to contractile stimulation, especially in oesophageal preparations that were mounted following the circular orientation of the muscularis externa layer. The contractility of longitudinal preparations of the rat oesophagus appeared less susceptible to the deleterious effects of acid challenge. In contrast, the responsiveness of ring-like preparations from the gastro-oesophageal junction to contractile stimulation was unaltered by acid challenge. Taurodeoxycholic acid decreased the responsiveness of circular oesophageal preparations to KCl, an effect that was exacerbated by luminal acidity. On the contrary, although the relaxant ability of the rat oesophagus did not change, acid challenge increased the relaxant efficacy of sodium nitroprusside and isoprenaline in strips of the gastro-oesophageal junction. A significant decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance was seen when the oesophageal mucosa was challenged at pH 1 but not at pH 4. Treatment with alginate blunted the deleterious effects of acid challenge on transepithelial electrical resistance and the responsiveness of oesophageal preparations to KCl. The present findings support the notion that luminal acidity is an important factor that disrupts barrier function in the oesophagus to allow the diffusion of noxious agents, such as bile acid, that alter the contractile status of the oesophagus.

Comparison of mucosal impedance measurements throughout the esophagus and mucosal eosinophil counts in endoscopic biopsy specimens in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) activity from limited esophageal mucosal biopsy samples has been questioned. Here our aim was to compare mucosal impedance (MI) throughout the esophagus and eosinophil counts in endoscopic biopsy samples in EoE. METHODS: We compared 20-site MI using a balloon catheter in the esophagus and eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF) in esophageal mucosal biopsy samples. Data are summarized as median (interquartile range) comparing control subjects and EoE using Mann-Whitney rank sum test and between endoscopic reference score and MI (minimal and average) using rank Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Ten adult control patients (ages 38-70) and 23 EoE patients (ages 21-80, 18 active) were studied. The mean (range) pan-esophageal MI in control subjects was significantly higher (6435 ohms [4546-7301]) compared with EoE patients (2004 ohms [1437-2546], P < .001). In control patients 172 of 180 (95.6%) individual impedance measurements (18 per patient) were normal when compared with 126 of 432 (29.2%) measurements in EoE. No EoE patient had uniformly normal MI. MI varied widely, with 19 of 23 patients having values above and below 2300 ohms (normal) regardless of EoE activity. Correlation of maximim eos/HPF with minimum and average MI per patient was r = -.243, P = .072 and r = -.358, P = .086, respectively. Of 5 patients with inactive EoE, 3 had >50% abnormal MI segments. Correlation coefficients of the endoscopic reference score with minimum and average MI were r = -.154, P = .47 and r = -.27, P = .20, respectively. The procedure was <5 minutes without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: MI is lower in the esophagus of EoE patients compared with control subjects with poor correlation between peak esophageal eosinophil counts, EoE activity, and MI. Segmental esophageal MI provides a unique marker of esophageal dysfunction in EoE. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02995395.).

Can Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cause Achalasia and Other Esophageal Motility Disorders?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a disorder identified by its esophageal mucosal features, often is associated with esophageal motility abnormalities, which are manifestations of esophageal muscle dysfunction. Those motility abnormalities sometimes normalize with treatments that reduce esophageal eosinophilia, suggesting that eosinophils can cause reversible esophageal motility disturbances, perhaps by releasing myoactive and neuroactive eosinophil products. Although achalasia uncommonly is associated with EoE as currently defined, most achalasia patients have evidence of an abnormal accumulation of eosinophils and/or their degranulation products in the esophageal muscularis propria, a location inaccessible to routine endoscopic evaluation. Achalasia is an idiopathic condition resulting from destruction of neurons in the myenteric plexus of the esophagus, and degranulating eosinophils release toxic proteins capable of destroying those neurons, thereby causing the irreversible motility abnormalities of achalasia. This report reviews data on the association of esophageal eosinophilia with achalasia and other esophageal motility abnormalities. Based on this review, we propose that EoE, like eosinophilic gastroenteritis, might have mucosal-predominant and muscle-predominant forms with different clinical manifestations. A muscle-predominant form of EoE could underlie a variety of reversible and irreversible esophageal motility disorders, including achalasia. The concept that esophageal motility abnormalities might develop from a muscle-predominant form of EoE warrants serious consideration and further investigation.

Mucosal Impedance Measurements Differentiate Pediatric Patients With Active Versus Inactive Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disorder in children that requires continued assessment of disease activity, involving repeated sedation, endoscopy, and biopsy analysis. We investigated whether mucosal impedance measurements can be used to monitor disease activity in pediatric patients with EoE. METHODS: We measured mucosal impedance at 3 locations in the esophagus in pediatric patients (1-18 years old; 32 with active EoE, 10 with inactive EoE, 32 with nonerosive reflux disease [NERD]) and 53 children with symptoms but normal findings from histologic analyses (controls) undergoing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the Vanderbilt Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic. Pathologists reviewed biopsies per routine protocol, determined eosinophilic density, and graded spongiosis on an ordinal visual scale. Mucosal impedance measurements were compared within patient groups. The primary outcome was correlation of mucosal impedance measurements with disease activity, based on severity of spongiosis and eosinophil counts. RESULTS: Mucosal impedance measurements were significantly lower in patients with active EoE at 2, 5, and 10 cm above the squamo-columnar junction (median values of 1069, 1368, and 1707, respectively) compared to patients with inactive EoE (median values of 3663, 3657, and 4494, respectively), NERD (median values of 2754, 3243, and 4387), and controls (median values of 3091, 3760, and 4509) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons to patients with active EoE). We found inverse correlations between mucosal impedance measurements and eosinophil count (P < 0.001), and spongiosis severity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal impedance measurements may provide immediate information about mucosal inflammation in children. Patients with active EoE have significantly lower mucosal impedance values than patients with inactive EoE, NERD, or controls; mucosal impedance measurements correlate inversely with eosinophil counts and spongiosis severity. Mucosal impedance is a promising rapid and less-invasive method to monitor EoE activity in pediatric patients with EoE; it could reduce costs and risks of disease monitoring.

Disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with impaired esophageal barrier integrity.

In eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the esophageal barrier integrity is impaired. Integrity can be assessed with different techniques. To assess the correlations between esophageal eosinophilia and various measures of mucosal integrity and to evaluate whether endoscopic impedance measurements can predict disease activity, endoscopies and mucosal integrity measurements were performed in adult EoE patients with active disease (≥15 eosinophils/high-power field) at baseline (n = 32) and after fluticasone (n = 15) and elemental dietary treatment (n = 14) and in controls (n = 19). Mucosal integrity was evaluated during endoscopy using electrical tissue spectroscopy (ETIS) measuring mucosal impedance and transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and transepithelial molecule-flux through biopsy specimens in Ussing chambers. We included 61 measurements; 32 of patients at baseline and 29 after treatment, 3 patients dropped out. After treatment, 20 patients were in remission (≤15 eosinophils/high-power field) and these measurements were compared with 41 measurements of patients with active disease (at baseline or after failed treatment). All four mucosal integrity measures showed significant impairment in active EoE compared with remission. Eosinophilia was negatively correlated with ETIS and TER and positively with transepithelial molecule flux (P ≤ 0.001). The optimal ETIS cutoff to predict disease activity was 6,000 Ω·m with a sensitivity of 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54-94%], specificity of 84% (95% CI 69-94%), positive predictive values of 89% (95% CI 77-95%) and negative predictive values of 71% (95% CI 54-84%). In EoE patients, markers of mucosal integrity correlate with esophageal eosinophilia. Additionally, endoscopic mucosal impedance measurements can predict disease activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the mucosal integrity, measured by making use of four different parameters, correlates strongly with esophageal eosinophilia. The accuracy of endoscopically measured mucosal impedance to distinguish active disease from remission was acceptable with moderate specificity and sensitivity. Mucosal impedance measurements can predict disease activity in adult EoE patients.

A novel murine model of esophageal nonerosive reflux disease: from inflammation to impairment in mucosal integrity.

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is a highly prevalent phenotype of the gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this study, we developed a novel murine model of NERD in mice with microscopic inflammation and impairment in the epithelial esophageal barrier. Female Swiss mice were subjected to the following surgical procedure: the transitional region between the forestomach and the glandular portion of the stomach was ligated, and a nontoxic ring was placed around the duodenum near the pylorus. The control group underwent sham surgery. The animals were euthanized at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Survival and body weight were monitored daily. Esophageal wet weight, macroscopic lesion, histopathological alterations, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, cytokine levels, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), and mucosal permeability were evaluated. The survival rate was 78% at 14 days, with mild loss in body weight. Surgery did not induce erosive esophagitis but instead induced microscopic inflammation and increased esophageal wet weight, IL-6, keratinocyte-derived cytokine (KC) levels, and MPO activity with maximal peak between 3 and 7 days and resolution at 14 days postsurgery. Epithelial esophageal barrier was evaluated in operated mice at 7 and 14 days postsurgery; a decrease in TEER and increase in the esophageal epithelial permeability were observed compared with the sham-operated group. In addition, the inhibition of acid secretion with omeprazole significantly prevented the esophageal inflammation and impairment of barrier function at 7 days postsurgery. Thus we established a novel experimental model of NERD in mice, which can contribute to understanding the pathophysiological events associated with NERD.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we standardized an experimental model of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) in mice. This model involves an acute inflammatory response followed by impaired esophageal mucosal integrity, even in the absence of inflammation. Thus this model can serve for evaluation of pathophysiological aspects of NERD and open new perspectives for therapeutic strategies for patients with this disorder.

Safe Energy Source in Battery-operated Toys for Children.

OBJECTIVES: Serious and even fatal consequences of disk batteries ingestion in children are well known. Among other applications, disk batteries are used to power small toys, from which they can be unexpectedly extracted and swallowed. METHODS: We tested a new cell intended for little toys (green cell [GC]), after 6 and 12 hours of in vitro close contact with esophageal swine mucosa. The GC was compared with lithium and silver button batteries under the same experimental conditions. RESULTS: Tissues in contact with the GC did not show pH variations nor histological alterations after 6 and 12 hours. In such conditions, statistically significant differences were found between the GC and the lithium and silver batteries. CONCLUSIONS: So far, multidisciplinary medical effort has been driven to both emergency approach and subsequent operative strategies in children with ingested batteries. Our trial demonstrates the possibility to primarily prevent battery-induced damages by designing new-generation safe cells with no tissue toxicity to power little toys intended for children.

Esophageal mucosal integrity improves after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance reflects the conductivity of the esophageal mucosa and may be an instrument for in vivo evaluation of mucosal integrity in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is a well-established treatment option for children with proton pump inhibitory (PPI) therapy resistant GERD. The effect of LARS in children on baseline impedance has not been studied in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LARS on baseline impedance in children with GERD. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, nationwide cohort study (Dutch national trial registry: NTR2934) including 25 patients [12 males, median age 6 (range 2-18) years] with PPI-resistant GERD scheduled to undergo LARS. Twenty-four hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH monitoring) was performed before and 3 months after LARS. Baseline impedance was evaluated during consecutive 2-h intervals in the 24-h tracings. RESULTS: LARS reduced acid exposure time from 8.5 % (6.0-16.2 %) to 0.8 % (0.2-2.8 %), p < 0.001. Distal baseline impedance increased after LARS from 2445 Ω (1147-3277 Ω) to 3792 Ω (3087-4700 Ω), p < 0.001. Preoperative baseline impedance strongly correlated with acid exposure time (r -0.76, p < 0.001); however, no association between symptomatic outcome and baseline impedance was identified. CONCLUSIONS: LARS significantly increased baseline impedance likely reflecting recovery of mucosal integrity. As the change in baseline impedance was not associated with the clinical outcome of LARS, other factors besides mucosal integrity may contribute to symptom perception in children with GERD.

Effect of morbid obesity, gastric banding and gastric bypass on esophageal symptoms, mucosa and function.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are commonly associated diseases. Bariatric surgery has been shown to have various impacts on esophageal function and GERD. Our aim was to evaluate changes in symptoms, endoscopic findings, bolus passage and esophageal function in patients after primary gastric bypass surgery as compared to patients converted from gastric banding to gastric bypass. METHODS: Obese patients scheduled for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (naïve-to-bypass) and patients who previously underwent gastric banding and were considered for conversion from gastric banding to gastric bypass (band-to-bypass) were included. Patients rated esophageal and epigastric symptoms (100 point VAS) and underwent upper endoscopy, impedance-manometry, and modified "timed barium swallow" before/after surgery. RESULTS: Data from 66 naïve-to-bypass patients (51/66, 77 % females, mean age 41.2 ± 11.1 years) and 68 band-to-bypass patients (53/68, 78 % females, mean age 43.8 ± 10.0 years) were available for analysis. Esophageal symptoms, esophagitis, esophageal motility abnormalities and impaired esophageal bolus transit were more common in patients that underwent gastric banding compared to those that underwent gastric bypass. The majority of symptoms, lesions and abnormalities induced by gastric banding were decreased by conversion to gastric bypass. Esophagitis was present in 28/68 (41 %) and 13/47 (28 %) patients in the band-to-bypass group, pre- versus postoperatively, respectively, (p < 0.05). The percentage of swallows with normal bolus transit increased following transformation from gastric band to gastric bypass (57.9 ± 4.1 and 83.6 ± 3.4 %, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: From an esophageal perspective, gastric bypass surgery induces less motility disorders and esophageal symptoms and should be therefore favored over gastric banding in difficult to treat obese patients at risk of repeated bariatric surgery.

Conventional and simple methods of measuring esophageal nocturnal baseline impedance show excellent agreement.

OBJECTIVES: Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) shows promise in investigating reflux disease by reflecting esophageal mucosal integrity. This study aimed to measure MNBI by both conventional and simple methods in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in order to evaluate the efficacy of the simple measurement method. METHODS: Altogether 187 patients were divided into LPR (n = 105) or GERD (n = 82) groups according to their predominant symptom profile, and underwent off-therapy impedance-pH monitoring. MNBI was measured by both the conventional and simple methods. The Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess mean differences and to identify bias in the two measurement methods. RESULTS: For the two measurement methods, mean difference was (-89 ± 328) Ω in the distal esophagus, (-6 ± 653) Ω in the proximal esophagus, and (128 ± 577) Ω in the pharynx, respectively. There was a strong correlation between conventional and simple MNBI values, with  the coefficient of 0.940 in the distal esophagus, 0.463 in the proximal esophagus, and 0.712 in the pharynx (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an excellent agreement between the conventional and simple methods of MNBI measurement, with no evidence of proportional bias. Conventional and simple MNBI values correlated excellently in the distal esophagus and moderately well in the proximal esophagus and pharynx. This study supports the use of the simple method of measuring MNBI to enhance diagnoses of reflux disease.

Mucosal pathogenesis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite gastro-esophageal reflux disease affecting up to 20% of Western populations, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying its most troublesome symptom: heartburn. Recent findings have unveiled the role of components of the esophageal mucosa in the pathogenesis of GERD including sensory nociceptive nerves and inflammatory mediators. Erosive esophagitis was long believed to develop as a result of acid injury at the esophageal lumen, but novel concepts suggest the generation of reflux-induced esophageal injury as a result of cytokine-mediated inflammation. Moreover, the localization and characterization of mucosal afferent nerves vary between GERD phenotypes and could explain the heterogeneity of symptom perception between patients who experience similar levels of acid reflux. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to consider the crosstalk of different factors of the esophageal mucosa in the pathogenesis of GERD, with a particular focus on mucosal innervation and molecular basis of acid-induced cytokine response. We discuss the current understanding of the mucosal response to acid injury, the nociceptive role of acid-sensitive receptors expressed in the esophageal mucosa, and the role of esophageal epithelial cells in initiating the onset of erosive esophagitis.

Esophageal physiology-an overview of esophageal disorders from a pathophysiological point of view.

The esophagus serves the principal purpose of transporting food from the pharynx into the stomach. A complex interplay between nerves and muscle fibers ensures that swallowing takes place as a finely coordinated event. Esophageal function can be tested by a variety of methods, endoscopy, manometry, and reflux monitoring being some of the most important. Regarding pathophysiology, motor disorders, such as achalasia, often cause dysphagia and/or chest pain. Functional esophageal disorders are a heterogeneous group with hypersensitivity as a dominant pathophysiological factor. Gastroesophageal reflux disease often causes symptoms, such as heartburn and regurgitation, and a spectrum of disease, ranging from minimal mucosal damage visible only in the microscope to esophageal ulcers and strictures in the most severe cases. Eosinophilic esophagitis is an immune-mediated condition that can result in significant dysphagia and associated luminal narrowing. In the following, we will provide an overview of the most common esophageal disorders from a combined pathophysiological and clinical view.

Impedance in the evaluation of the esophagus.

The aim of this paper is to review esophageal electrical impedance technologies and to discuss the use of these technologies for physiological measurements, diagnostics, and therapy of esophageal disease. In order to develop a better understanding of the pathophysiology of and improve the diagnosis of esophageal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and achalasia, several new diagnostic tests, including intraluminal impedance, esophageal mucosal impedance, and the functional luminal imaging probe, have been developed. These technologies have proven valuable for assessment of the esophagus in recent years. They provide information on esophageal flow properties, mucosal integrity, lumen shape, and distensibility in esophageal disorders, in particular for GERD and achalasia. Despite their promise and novel clinical studies, the potential of these technologies has been far from realized. New multidisciplinary approaches will contribute to our understanding and interpretation of esophageal impedance data and disease mechanisms.

Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux: an update on current and emerging modalities.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition characterized by troublesome symptoms or esophageal mucosal lesions attributed to excessive esophageal acid exposure. Various pathophysiological mechanisms account for GERD, including impaired esophageal peristalsis and anatomical or physiological defects at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Endoscopy identifies GERD complications and detects potential alternative diagnoses. However, if symptoms persist despite proton pump inhibitor therapy, functional esophageal tests are useful to characterize reflux burden and define the symptom association profile. Ambulatory pH or pH-impedance monitoring measures the 24-h acid exposure time, which remains the most reproducible reflux metric and predicts response to antireflux therapy. Apart from identifying peristaltic dysfunction, esophageal high-resolution manometry defines the morphology and contractile vigor (EGJ-CI) of the EGJ. Novel metrics obtained from pH-impedance monitoring include the postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and mean nocturnal baseline impedance, which augment the diagnostic value of pH-impedance testing. Mucosal impedance can also be recorded using a probe inserted through a gastroscope, or a novel balloon catheter with arrays of impedance electrodes inserted following sedated endoscopy. The latest developments in functional esophageal tests define the GERD phenotype based on pathogenesis, reflux exposure, structural or motility disorders, and symptom burden, facilitating appropriate treatment.