Variation in classification of live birth with newborn period death versus fetal death at the local level may impact reported infant mortality rate.

BACKGROUND: To better understand factors that may impact infant mortality rates (IMR), we evaluated the consistency across birth hospitals in the classification of a birth event as either a fetal death or an early neonatal (infant) death using natality data from North Carolina for the years 1995-2000. METHODS: A database consisting of fetal deaths and infant deaths occurring within the first 24 hours after birth was constructed. Bivariate, followed by multivariable regression, analyses were used to control for relevant maternal and infant factors. Based upon hospital variances, adjustments were made to evaluate the impact of the classification on statewide infant mortality rate. RESULTS: After controlling for multiple maternal and infant factors, birth hospital remained a factor related to the classification of early neonatal versus fetal death. Reporting of early neonatal deaths versus fetal deaths consistent with the lowest or highest hospital strata would have resulted in an adjusted IMR varying from 7.5 to 10.64 compared with the actual rate of 8.95. CONCLUSIONS: Valid comparisons of IMR among geographic regions within and between countries require consistent classification of perinatal deaths. This study demonstrates that local variation in categorization of death events as fetal death versus neonatal death within the first 24 hours after delivery may impact a state-level IMR in a meaningful magnitude. The potential impact of this issue on IMRs should be examined in other state and national populations.

Stillbirth classification in population-based data and role of fetal growth restriction: the example of RECODE.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth classifications use various strategies to synthesise information associated with fetal demise with the aim of identifying key causes for the death. RECODE is a hierarchical classification of death-related conditions, which grants a major place to fetal growth restriction (FGR). Our objective was to explore how placement of FGR in the hierarchy affected results from the classification. METHODS: In the Rhône-Alpes region, all stillbirths were recorded in a local registry from 2000 to 2010 in three districts (N = 969). Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as a birthweight below the 10th percentile. We applied RECODE and then modified the hierarchy, including FGR as the penultimate category (RECODE-R). RESULTS: 49.0% of stillbirths were SGA. From RECODE to RECODE-R, stillbirths attributable to FGR decreased from 38% to 14%, in favour of other related conditions. Nearly half of SGA stillbirths (49%) were reclassified. There was a non-significant tendency toward moderate SGA, singletons and full-term stillbirths to older mothers being reclassified. CONCLUSIONS: The position of FGR in hierarchical stillbirth classification has a major impact on the first condition associated with stillbirth. RECODE-R calls less attention to monitoring SGA fetuses but illustrates the diversity of death-related conditions for small fetuses.

Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?

Despite increasing attention and investment for maternal, neonatal, and child health, stillbirths remain invisible-not counted in the Millennium Development Goals, nor tracked by the UN, nor in the Global Burden of Disease metrics. At least 2·65 million stillbirths (uncertainty range 2·08 million to 3·79 million) were estimated worldwide in 2008 (≥1000 g birthweight or ≥28 weeks of gestation). 98% of stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and numbers vary from 2·0 per 1000 total births in Finland to more than 40 per 1000 total births in Nigeria and Pakistan. Worldwide, 67% of stillbirths occur in rural families, 55% in rural sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, where skilled birth attendance and caesarean sections are much lower than that for urban births. In total, an estimated 1·19 million (range 0·82 million to 1·97 million) intrapartum stillbirths occur yearly. Most intrapartum stillbirths are associated with obstetric emergencies, whereas antepartum stillbirths are associated with maternal infections and fetal growth restriction. National estimates of causes of stillbirths are scarce, and multiple (>35) classification systems impede international comparison. Immediate data improvements are feasible through household surveys and facility audit, and improvements in vital registration, including specific perinatal certificates and revised International Classification of Disease codes, are needed. A simple, programme-relevant stillbirth classification that can be used with verbal autopsy would provide a basis for comparable national estimates. A new focus on all deaths around the time of birth is crucial to inform programmatic investment.

Reducing the proportion of stillborn babies classified as unexplained in Vietnam by application of the PSANZ clinical practice guideline.

BACKGROUND: Over 2.6 million babies are stillborn every year mostly in low- and middle-income countries, where cause of death remains often unexplained. AIM: To determine the applicability and utility of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand (PSANZ) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Perinatal Mortality in reducing the proportion of unexplained stillbirths in a hospital setting in Vietnam. METHODS: An analytic cross-sectional study of stillborn babies born at a major maternity facility in Vietnam. Maternal history, external physical examination of the baby and placental macroscopic examination were performed. Two experienced classifiers independently assigned PSANZ perinatal death classification (PDC). This was compared to cause of death documented in the hospital records. RESULTS: 107 stillborn babies were born to 105 mothers. The proportion of stillborn babies classified as unexplained was reduced from 52.3 to 24.3% (P < 0.01) using the PSANZ-PDC system. Causes of death were congenital abnormalities (35.6%), hypertension (8.4%), fetal growth restriction (8.4%), specific perinatal conditions (8.4%), spontaneous preterm (6.5%), maternal conditions (5.6%) and antepartum haemorrhage (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the PSANZ-CPG and stillbirth classification system is effective and feasible in a low-income country facility setting and resulted in a reduction in the number of babies classified as unexplained stillbirth in Vietnam.

[The problem of study of unexplainable antenatal fetal death].

The paperpresents the data on the causes ofperinatal mortality. Particular emphasis is placed on unexplainable antenatal fetal death, the absence of uniform terminology or a consensus classification of the causes of antenatal fetal death, and the principles in placental studies and stillborn baby autopsy. Various aspects of sophisticated relations in the mother-placenta-fetus system are considered. It is pointed out that the number of unexplainable antenatal fetal deaths can be reduced when the placenta is meticulously studied. A conventional protocol for stillborn baby autopsy and placental studies is noted to be elaborated.

Stillbirth classification--developing an international consensus for research: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.

Stillbirth is a major obstetric complication, with 3.2 million stillbirths worldwide and 26,000 stillbirths in the United States every year. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development held a workshop from October 22-24, 2007, to review the pathophysiology of conditions underlying stillbirth to define causes of death. The optimal classification system would identify the pathophysiologic entity initiating the chain of events that irreversibly led to death. Because the integrity of the classification is based on available pathologic, clinical, and diagnostic data, experts emphasized that a complete stillbirth workup should be performed. Experts developed evidence-based characteristics of maternal, fetal, and placental conditions to attribute a condition as a cause of stillbirth. These conditions include infection, maternal medical conditions, antiphospholipid syndrome, heritable thrombophilias, red cell alloimmunization, platelet alloimmunization, congenital malformations, chromosomal abnormalities including confined placental mosaicism, fetomaternal hemorrhage, placental and umbilical cord abnormalities including vasa previa and placental abruption, complications of multifetal gestation, and uterine complications. In all cases, owing to lack of sufficient knowledge about disease states and normal development, there will be a degree of uncertainty regarding whether a specific condition was indeed the cause of death.

Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - issues in data collection for stillbirths.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirths need to count. They constitute the majority of the world's perinatal deaths and yet, they are largely invisible. Simply counting stillbirths is only the first step in analysis and prevention. From a public health perspective, there is a need for information on timing and circumstances of death, associated conditions and underlying causes, and availability and quality of care. This information will guide efforts to prevent stillbirths and improve quality of care. DISCUSSION: In this report, we assess how different definitions and limits in registration affect data capture, and we discuss the specific challenges of stillbirth registration, with emphasis on implementation. We identify what data need to be captured, we suggest a dataset to cover core needs in registration and analysis of the different categories of stillbirths with causes and quality indicators, and we illustrate the experience in stillbirth registration from different cultural settings. Finally, we point out gaps that need attention in the International Classification of Diseases and review the qualities of alternative systems that have been tested in low- and middle-income settings. SUMMARY: Obtaining high-quality data will require consistent definitions for stillbirths, systematic population-based registration, better tools for surveys and verbal autopsies, capacity building and training in procedures to identify causes of death, locally adapted quality indicators, improved classification systems, and effective registration and reporting systems.

The Stockholm classification of stillbirth.

OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a classification system for audit groups working with stillbirth. The classification includes well-defined primary and associated conditions related to fetal death. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: All delivery wards in Stockholm. POPULATION: Stillbirths from 22 completed weeks in Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: Parallel to audit work, the Stockholm stillbirth group has developed a classification of conditions related to stillbirth. The classification has been validated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The classification and the results of the validation are presented. RESULT: The classification with 17 groups identifying underlying conditions related to stillbirth (primary diagnoses) and associated factors which may have contributed to the death (associated diagnoses) is described. The conditions are subdivided into definite, probable and possible relation to the death. An evaluation of 382 cases of stillbirth during 2002-2005 resulted in 382 primary diagnoses and 132 associated diagnoses. The most common conditions identified were intrauterine growth restriction/placental insufficiency (23%), infection (19%), malformations/chromosomal abnormalities (12%). The 'unexplained' group together with the 'unknown' group comprised 18%. Validation was done by reclassification of 95 cases from 2005 by six investigators. The overall agreement regarding primary diagnosis was substantial (kappa=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The Stockholm classification of stillbirth consists of 17 diagnostic groups allowing one primary diagnosis and if needed, associated diagnoses. Diagnoses are subdivided according to definite, probable and possible relation to stillbirth. Validation showed high degree of agreement regarding primary diagnosis. The classification can provide a useful tool for clinicians and audit groups when discussing cause and underlying conditions of fetal death.

[Early pregnancy: revision of the Dutch terminology for clinical and ultrasound findings]. / De jonge zwangerschap: revisie van de Nederlandse benamingen voor klinische en echoscopische bevindingen.

The nomenclature used to describe findings during early pregnancy in The Netherlands needs to be revised. Various terms, like 'abortion' and 'miscarriage', are used to describe the same phenomenon, which is confusing for both patients and doctors. In addition, the meaning of some terms, like 'missed abortion', has changed over time. In accordance with the revision of the European nomenclature in the English language by the Special Interest Group for Early Pregnancy of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), a revision of the nomenclature in the Dutch language is needed as well. An unambiguous Dutch terminology pertaining to early pregnancy is recommended that corresponds to the English terminology; this includes the Dutch terms 'embryo' [embryo], 'foetus' [foetus], 'biochemische zwangerschap' [biochemical pregnancy], 'zwangerschap met onbekende lokalisatie' [pregnancy of unknown location], 'miskraam' [miscarriage], 'lege vruchtzak' [empty sac], 'gestopte hart-activiteit' [fetal loss], 'herhaalde miskraam' [recurrent miscarriage], 'extra-uteriene zwangerschap' [ectopic pregnancy], and 'trofoblast-ziekte' [gestational trophoblastic disease], because these are based on well-defined clinical and ultrasonographic concepts.

[Legal and practical aspects of perinatal death]. / Overleden pasgeborenen: wet en praktijk.

There is some debate as to whether the Dutch Burial Act applies to neonatal deaths after a gestation of less than 24 weeks. It is recommended that the Act be considered applicable in these situations, leading to a compulsory (external) post mortem examination, the issue of an official death certificate, and registration of the birth and death at the official registry office, followed by burial or cremation according to the law. The Act should be amended to this effect. It is also recommended that the Burial Act no longer apply in cases of known intra-uterine death before 24 weeks of gestation where birth takes place after 24 weeks. The stipulated cut-off point in the Act for defining a miscarriage as opposed to a birth or stillbirth, i.e. 24 weeks of gestation, should preferably be replaced by the international (WHO) criterion of a birth weight of 500 g, as this will lead to less ambiguity and a better comparison of Dutch and international data concerning perinatal mortality.

NICE, a new cause of death classification for stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Neonatal and Intrauterine Death Classification according to Etiology.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirths and neonatal deaths are often the result of a complicated chain of events. For epidemiological purposes a classification into single cause of death groups is essential. For large-scale studies, a method is needed which enables such grouping based on available register data. METHODS: A cause of death classification system called NICE is presented. It is hierarchical and is aetiologically orientated. A computerized method is adapted which makes use of data in four central Swedish registries. A validation of the computer method has been made from the medical records on a 10% sample of all stillbirths and neonatally dead infants in Sweden from 1983 to 1990. RESULTS: The specificity of the computer method is high, sensitivity is less satisfactory for some subgroups. A time trend analysis illustrates the usefulness of the classification system and shows a decline with time for two groups: placental abruption and obstetric complications. CONCLUSIONS: The NICE classification system fulfils the criteria of an aetiologically orientated classification system which can be used in a computerized environment.

A computer-based method for cause of death classification in stillbirths and neonatal deaths.

BACKGROUND: In large-scale epidemiological studies of stillbirths and neonatal deaths a method is needed to replace detailed medical record audits in order to determine the cause of death. METHODS: A computer-based method is presented for determination of the cause of death in stillbirths and in neonatal deaths. It utilizes information in the Swedish medical registries. The study comprises 6044 dead infants born in Sweden from 1983-1990. For each infant the program determines 31 basic characteristics which are important in deciding the cause of death. Based on these characteristics a modified Wigglesworth's classification is used to find the cause of death. The validity of the method was checked by comparing the computer generated information with information obtained by scrutinizing medical records for a 10% representative sample (603 infants). RESULTS: Specificity and sensitivity for each basic characteristic varied, but for the modified Wigglesworth cause of death classification the concordance was 88%. The weakest data refer to intrauterine deaths, where pertinent information was often missing in the medical registries. CONCLUSION: The method can be used for large-scale epidemiological studies.

Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction.

Stillbirths are the largest component of perinatal mortality. Most are currently classified as 'unexplained', which is not helpful for counselling and individual care or for setting priorities for maternity services. The new ReCoDe classification reduces the number of stillbirths categorized as 'unexplained' from 66 to 14%. Both stillbirths and neonatal deaths are strongly associated with fetal growth restriction, and increased awareness of intrauterine growth is essential for any strategies which seek to avoid adverse perinatal outcome.

The epidemiology of traumatic injury-related fetal mortality in Pennsylvania, 1995-1997: the role of motor vehicle crashes.

METHODS: Rates and causes of traumatic injury-related fetal deaths in Pennsylvania were determined from a manual review of all fetal death certificates filed from 1995 to 1997 (7,131 cases). RESULTS: Thirty one traumatic injury cases were identified (6.5/100,000 live births). Most cases (94%) could be identified from the diagnosis code of 760.5 (maternal injury) and 87% contained narratives indicating specific injury mechanisms. Motor vehicles were the leading cause of injury (81%). Placental separation was the leading diagnosis (42%). CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-9-CM code 760.5 appears to be a specific indicator of traumatic fetal death, though it is not known how sensitive an indicator it is. Though not usually E-coded, the death certificates contained enough information to allow ascertainment of injury mechanism. These are very conservative estimates of the burden of the problem. The major role that motor vehicle injuries have on reported traumatic fetal injury deaths was shown and a significant new challenge for child passenger safety advocates is indicated.

Using the Nordic-Baltic perinatal death classification to assess perinatal care in Ukraine.

OBJECTIVE: To identify health care issues important to reduce the perinatal mortality rate (PMR) in Ukraine. STUDY DESIGN: Perinatal deaths in the Donetsk region (Ukraine) in 1997-1998 were compared with those in Denmark in 1996 by using the Nordic-Baltic classification for perinatal deaths. Clinical guidelines, use of technology and rates of interventions in the two regions were described. RESULTS: A two-fold increase in PMR was found in Ukraine compared to Denmark, mainly explained by higher rates of antenatal deaths of growth restricted fetuses, intrapartum deaths, and neonatal deaths due to asphyxia. Vacuum extraction is rarely used in Ukraine. The clinical guidelines for care differ significantly between the two regions. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of technology and implementation of evidence-based guidelines should be a matter of high priority in the Donetsk region, Ukraine.

Use of classification of primary obstetric factors in perinatally related mortality surveillance.

The use of a classification of the primary obstetric factors leading to death for all fetal and neonatal losses that occurred between 20 weeks gestation and 28 days after birth is described. This is defined as the 'total perinatally related loss', and is compared with the information obtained if enquiry is limited to the traditional 'perinatal' period, from 28 weeks gestation to 7 days after birth. Both centre-based data for Queen Mary Hospital, Dunedin, and population-based data for the geographic area of the Otago Hospital Board for the four year period from September 1982 until August 1986 are reported. Spontaneous prematurity was the major factor responsible for these deaths, and its importance would not have been appreciated if the perinatal period alone had been analysed. The need for standardised classification of perinatally related deaths for epidemiological monitoring is discussed.

[Definition and classification of perinatal mortality]. / Problèmes de définition et de classification des décès périnatals.

Analysis of problems related to the classification of perinatal mortality was made possible through the evaluation of data collected from the medical records of nine maternity hospitals in South-Hainaut. Medical records of 135 fetal and early neonatal deaths were investigated. Perinatal mortality statistics were compiled on the basis of five different definitions of perinatal mortality. Depending on which definition was used, perinatal mortality varied between 10.2% and 15.1%. This study shows that reporting of perinatal mortality in hospital registries according to the legal requirement is incomplete. Standard data should be collected for each pregnancy product, on the basis of clearly defined, national and international accepted definitions. It is suggested that the 1975 recommendations of the World Health Organization (International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition), be used for definition and classification of perinatal mortality.

Classification of perinatal deaths.

PIP: Accurate classification of perinatal deaths is instrumental in efforts to improve the perinatal mortality rate (PNMR). Accurate records should be maintained on birth weight, gestational age, a simple classification of cause of death (possibly the "Wigglesworth" or the author's system), a classification system correlated with birth weight/gestation of dead and live births, and, where possible, detailed coding such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). The fetal loss rate in Great Britain is reported as a minimum of 0.1% per week for pregnancies from 22 weeks until term. Obstetric or neonatal management can affect the level of mortality. Terminations due to malformations performed before the 24th week are found to account for a 50% decline in the PNMR. PNMR is affected also by birth weight and the occurrence of multiple births. Neonatal care that prolongs the survival of sick or malformed neonates may decrease PNMR or increase infant death rates. Analysis of trends in PNMR must consider demographic changes such as an increase in preterm multiple births due to fertility treatment. Perinatal deaths may be classified by cause with a variety of systems. The ICD system is a single axis classification which uses three digit codes for primary causes and a fourth and fifth digit for detailed subcategories, which can be accessed in a alphabetically-organized index. SNOMED provides six different fields of information, including topography, morphology, aetiology, function, disease, and procedure. Five subordinate fields are identified and linked to topographic body sites. Choice of classification systems is considered to be based on availability of information and the needs for subsequent analysis. Two other systems of classification are available in the UK. The Aberdeen system is based on maternal factors, but the disadvantage is the high number of unexplained deaths. The Hey et al. system codes by fetal and neonatal factors and does not require modern investigative techniques, but the detail is highly variables from case-to-case and hospital-to-hospital. The author's system is based on routine autopsies of external conditions. Four groupings are identified, including macerated normally-formed stillborn infants, congenital anomalies (stillbirth or neonatal death), conditions associated with prematurity, and fresh stillbirths presumed asphyxiated. A fifth category groups infants dying of specific conditions such as toxoplasmosis.^ieng

[Classification of perinatal deaths as a function of birth weight and gestational age. New methodologic approach]. / Classification des décès périnatals en fonction du poids de naissance et de l'âge gestationnel. Nouvelle approche méthodologique.

Perinatal mortality is closely related to infant birth weight. However, the examination of both gestational age and birth weight provides a more comprehensive approach. This study presents a method of evaluation which is readily applicable. Data were obtained from the computerized files of the maternity ward of the University Hospital of Caen. This report is based on case-reports of 17,952 single births, from May 1980 to July 1985 (cases of multiple birth have not been considered since their age/weight relationships are usually different). All stillborn infants and those who died within the first week of life were considered. Any infant whose gestational age was 28 weeks or more but who showed no sign of life at birth was considered stillborn. Gestational age was determined from the mother's last menstrual period, providing it concurred with the obstetrical evaluation (i.e. echographic measurements of foetus before 20 weeks of gestation). If not, the clinical evaluation was retained. Results are presented in the form of blocks, each one representing 1 week of gestational age and a birth weight of 500 g. The perinatal mortality rate was calculated for each block. Blocks of similar mortality rates (i.e. with no significant difference) were then pooled by means of a recently published method [3]. This difference between the mortality rates of 2 blocks (in percentages) may be measured by means of the chi-square test. The test enables the evaluation of the "distance" between two adjacent zones, which can be calculated for all the blocks of the graph, by pairs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)