Effect of dexmedetomidine on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric strabismus surgery: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common side-effects following strabismus surgery. The present study aimed to compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on PONV incidence in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blinded study, 126 pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized into one of three groups: Placebo group, normal saline; DEX1 group, 0.3 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, and DEX2 group, 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine. Oculocardiac reflex (OCR) events were recorded during surgery. PONV or postoperative vomiting (POV) was recorded for 24 h in the ward. Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale and emergence agitation (EA) scale were recorded in the recovery room. RESULTS: Intraoperative OCR was significantly reduced in DEX2 group (42%) as compared to that of Placebo group (68%) (p = 0.0146). During the first 24 h post-op, the overall incidence of PONV was significantly lower in DEX2 group (10%) than that of Placebo group (32%) (p = 0.0142). There was no significant difference in POV among the three groups. PAED or EA scores among the three groups were similar during recovery time. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) reduced OCR and PONV without lengthening extubation time or recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered before patient enrollment at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trial Number: ChiCTR1800020176, Date: 12/19/2018).

Quick rehabilitation nursing improves the recovery of colon cancer patients after laparoscopy.

Colon cancer is a common malignant tumor with particularly high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of quick rehabilitation nursing and routine nursing in postoperative recovery of patients with colon cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Two hundred forty patients with colon cancer were classified into four random groups (A, B, C and D, with 60 patients in each group). All patients underwent surgery to remove the colon tumor by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Patients in groups A and B received quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery. In group C patients, local anesthesia associated with quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery was used. Group D was used as control group and the patients were treated based on routine nursing. Time to get out of bed, first bowel movement time and the average time of hospitalisation in group A was lower than group D (p less than 0.05), postoperative leukocyte level as well as the occurrence rate of nausea and vomiting, ankylenteron and pelvic adhesion was decreased in group A compared to group D (p less than 0.05), but the postoperative albumin and total protein level was higher than group D (p less than 0.05). The serum level of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in group A was decreased compared to group D several days after surgery (p less than 0.05); group B had 4 cases of intestinal obstruction after surgery that could be cured through conservative treatment, while group D had 10 cases of intestinal obstruction, 8 of which could be cured through conservative treatment and two needed surgery (p less than 0.05); VAS for pain degree of group C in active state was clearly lower at 1h, 5h, 7h, 15h, 30h and 42h after surgery, and side effects of postoperative analgesia were clearly reduced. Time to get out of bed was obviously decreased, while there was no evident effect on postoperative dosage, chronic pain and complications. Adopting quick rehabilitation nursing can effectively reduce occurrence of complications and postoperative pain, speed up the recovery of gastrointestinal function, shorten the length of stay, and improve patients’ satisfaction.

Epidural Local Anesthetics Versus Opioid-Based Analgesic Regimens for Postoperative Gastrointestinal Paralysis, Vomiting, and Pain After Abdominal Surgery: A Cochrane Review.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to compare the effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anesthetics to postoperative systemic or epidural opioids in terms of return of gastrointestinal transit, postoperative pain control, postoperative vomiting, incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic leak, hospital length of stay, and cost after abdominal surgery. METHODS: Trials were identified by computerized searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 12), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) (from 1950 to December, 2014) and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) (from 1974 to December 2014) and by checking the reference lists of trials retained. We included parallel randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of postoperative epidural local anesthetic with regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids. The quality of the studies was rated according to the Cochrane tool. Two authors independently extracted data. We judged the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) working group scale. RESULTS: Based on 22 trials including 1138 participants, an epidural containing a local anesthetic will decrease the time required for return of gastrointestinal transit as measured by time required to observe the first flatus after an abdominal surgery standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.71 to -0.86; high quality of evidence; equivalent to 17.5 hours). The effect is proportional to the concentration of local anesthetic used. Based on 28 trials including 1559 participants, we also found a decrease in time to first feces (stool): SMD -0.67 (95% CI, -0.86 to -0.47; low quality of evidence; equivalent to 22 hours). Based on 35 trials including 2731 participants, pain on movement at 24 hours after surgery is also reduced: SMD -0.89 (95% CI, -1.08 to -0.70; moderate quality of evidence; equivalent to 2.5 on a scale from 0 to 10). Based on 22 trials including 1154 participants, we did not find a difference in the incidence of vomiting within 24 hours: risk ratio 0.84 (95% CI, 0.57-1.23); low quality of evidence. Based on 17 trials including 848 participants we did not find a difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic leak: risk ratio 0.74 (95% CI, 0.41-1.32; low quality of evidence). Based on 30 trials including 2598 participants, epidural analgesia reduces length of hospital stay for an open surgery: SMD -0.20 (95% CI, -0.35 to -0.04; very low quality of evidence; equivalent to 1 day). Data on cost were very limited. CONCLUSIONS: An epidural containing a local anesthetic, with or without the addition of an opioid, accelerates the return of the gastrointestinal transit (high quality of evidence). An epidural containing a local anesthetic with an opioid decreases pain after an abdominal surgery (moderate quality of evidence). An epidural containing a local anesthetic does not affect the incidence of vomiting or anastomotic leak (low quality of evidence). For an open surgery, an epidural containing a local anesthetic would reduce the length of hospital stay (very low quality of evidence).

Systematic nasogastric tube in aortic surgery: is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: Routine nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression has been traditionally used to prevent nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery. Besides, many studies having demonstrated no benefits derived from this practice after an elective laparotomy, little evidence has been published regarding its use in aortic surgery. In this study, we analyze the effects of the selective use of the NGT in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery in our center. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective infrarenal aortic surgery between January 2011 and December 2012. Patients were prospectively included in group A (systematic NGT placement) and group B (nonsystematic NGT). The main end point was the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Secondary end points were postoperative complications, time to first oral intake, and hospital stay. RESULTS: One hundred patients were finally included in the study, 50 patients per group. Preoperative and intraoperative data were similar between both groups. Higher incidence of PONV (48% vs. 10%; relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.5; P = 0.003) was observed in group A. Selective NGT behaved as a protective factor regarding earlier first oral intake in first postoperative 48 hours (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; P = 0.05). There were no differences in other adverse events although a trend toward fewer respiratory complications was observed in patients with nonsystematic NGT. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates higher incidence of PONV and longer time to first oral intake in patients with systematic NGT with no benefits derived from this practice. Based on these results, selective NGT decompression should be encouraged in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery.

TACR1 gene polymorphism and sex differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

We hypothesised that the genetic effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TACR1 gene, which encodes NK1 receptors, could influence the sex difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirty-two selected single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped by the Sanger sequencing method in 200 patients who underwent lower abdominal surgery. The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were evaluated after surgery. The rs3755468-SNP showed significant association with the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (p = 0.016). The TT haplotype defined by two single nucleotide polymorphisms, including the rs3755468-SNP, was associated with reduced incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients (p = 0.03). The rs3755468-SNP is located within the predicted oestrogen response element and a DNase I hypersensitive site. The single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TACR1 gene are associated with sex differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting and may help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these differences.

Sequence variants of the HTR3A gene contribute to the genetic prediction of postoperative nausea in Taiwan.

Postoperative nausea (PON) is a common complication, and therefore, it is important to identify the associated genetic factors and the candidate predictive markers. Current clinical and basic research suggests that the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3A receptor (HTR3A) may be important in the occurrence of PON. The association between three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HTR3A gene and PON was examined to determine whether this can be used to predict the incidence of PON in a unique Taiwanese population without any reported postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) risk factors associated with PON occurrence. One thousand adult surgical patients who received general anesthesia were included in this analysis. A total of 369 patients were finally selected for a two-stage association study. Significant single-locus associations for all three HTR3A SNPs and PON were identified in both stages. In addition, two of the most common haplotypes, CTT and TAG, showed both a significant risk for and a protective effect against PON, respectively. Our findings support the notion that different haplotypes of HTR3A have reciprocal effects in the etiology of PON. Therefore specific haplotypes of HTR3A may be useful as predictors of PON for 24 h immediately after surgery in our population.

[Impact of genetic factors on severity of side effects of opioids in patients after major surgical interventions].

The rate of the opioids side effects (SE) occurrence, as well as their mutual connection with possible variants of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of genes of a µ1-opioid receptor (OPRM1) 118A>G and catechol-O-methyltranspherase (COMT) 1947G>A were studied in patients after surgical interventions of large volumes in the first postoperative day the rate of the narcotic analgetics SE occurrence have constituted: nemesis--56%, vomiting--17%, dizziness--61%, cutaneous pruritis--17%. Occurrence of central SE of opioids may be caused by the SNP COMT 1947G>A genes: the sedation depth is two times more in the genes AA and GA carriers, in comparison with such in the gene GG carrier (p < 0.05). Gastrointestinal SE may be connected with genes SNP OPRM1 118A>G and COMT 1947G>A: the nemesis occurrence rate is more in the genes OPRM1 AG+GG, COMT GA and GG carriers (p < 0.05), vomiting--in 2,8 times more in the OPRM1 AG+GG genes carriers, than in the group OPRM1 AA (p < 0.05). The severity of cutaneous SE of opiates may be dependent on the variant of SNP COMT 1947G>A: in genotype GG the cutaneous pruritis rate is in 2.9 times more, than in the AA+GA group (p < 0.05).

Is there an association between PONV and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting?

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced nausea and vomiting, both post-operatively and following chemotherapy, is often distressing for the patients. Our clinical impression is that certain patients are not prone to but instead protected against both post-operative and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). If support for this hypothesis could be generated, it might be easier to identify such patients as low-risk patients and judge all other patients as high-risk patients by default. METHODS: All patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during 1 year (March 2003-March 2004) were asked to participate in this prospective, observational study. A number of women went on to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for 24 h with regard to the occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). CINV was assessed for 5 days after start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 275 women were included, 33% were classified as PONV and 67% as non-PONV. Sixty-one of the 275 women included were later subjected to adjuvant chemotherapy. In the non-PONV group, 95% of the patients did not experience CINV, whereas the association between PONV and subsequent CINV was only 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A substantially stronger interrelationship was found between non-PONV and non-CINV than between both PONV and CINV. This may suggest that certain patients, instead of being prone to nausea and vomiting, in fact in some way are protected against these unpleasant side effects.

The management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: current thoughts and protocols.

UNLABELLED: The postoperative course of surgical patients can have a tremendous impact on the surgical outcome and on patient satisfaction. One of the most significant issues is postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) which, despite being a common side effect of general anesthesia, has received little attention in the plastic surgery literature. The incidence and potential consequences of PONV are frequently underestimated and consequently the need for prophylaxis is often overlooked. There are significant consequences to this seemingly minor morbidity that extend beyond patient discomfort and dissatisfaction. In addition to being considered a significant undesirable outcome by patients, severe cases of PONV may result in postoperative complications and unplanned hospital admissions. In this article we overview the mechanism, pathophysiology, and risk factors for PONV and provide a comprehensive algorithmic approach to its management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Immune mediators of postoperative ileus.

UNLABELLED: CLINICAL BACKGROUND: In all patients undergoing abdominal surgery, a transient phase of interruption of bowel motility, named postoperative ileus (POI) occurs. POI is often accepted as an unavoidable "physiological" response and a self-limiting complication after surgery although it has a significant impact on patient morbidity with prolonged hospitalization and increased costs. Annual economic burden has been estimated as much as US $1.47 billion in the USA (Iyer et al. in J Manag Care Pharm 15(6):485-494, 2009). PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: The pathophysiology has been elucidated within the last decades, demonstrating that both, neurogenic and inflammatory mechanisms are involved in response to the surgical trauma. It is now generally accepted that POI pathogenesis processes in two phases: a first neurogenic phase is accountable for the immediate postoperative impairment of bowel motility. This is followed by a second immunological phase that can last for days and mainly affects strength and length of POI. More recent findings demonstrate a bidirectional interaction between the nervous and the immune system, and this interaction significantly contributed to our present understanding of POI pathophysiology. Although nerval mechanisms have a significant impact in the early phase of POI, the contribution of the immune system and subsequently its manipulation has risen as the most promising strategy in prevention or treatment of the clinically relevant prolonged form of POI. AIMS: The present manuscript will give an update on the inflammatory responses, the involved cell types, and participating immune mediators in POI.

Nausea and vomiting after surgery: it is not just postoperative.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), to discuss why it occurs, how it might be prevented and then how it can be treated. RECENT FINDINGS: PONV/postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) is a problem that patients identify as one of the worst, if not the worst problem that can occur after surgery. Therapy is not perfect, yet there are anaesthesia techniques that can help minimize the problem and drugs that can be used both to prevent and also treat the problem once it occurs. There is a genetic basis for why some people experience PONV/PDNV more than others and also why treatment for some is better than others. SUMMARY: It is easy to turn the vapourizer dial, but that is a part of the problem. Not everyone reacts the same to drugs. Although PDNV is not as well characterized as PONV, at the very least, avoid an anaesthetic that may make PONV/PDNV worse and be aggressive in treating the problem.

Effect of N2O on nausea and vomiting via intraabdominal pressure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to investigate whether there is an effect of N2O on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) via intraabdominal pressure (IAP). METHODS: A total of 40 patients with risk class ASA I-II and age ranging between 20 and 50 years were enrolled in the study. The patients were monitored for electrocardiography (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and body temperature. IAP was measured by a central venous pressure manometer placed in the urine catheter. Heart rate (HR), SpO2, SBP, DBP, MBP, ETCO2, body temperature and IAP were measured before the induction of anesthesia and every 10 minutes throughout the operation. Nausea and vomiting were questioned at the first and second postoperative hours. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups. Induction in both groups was provided using 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 µg/kg fentanyl and 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium, and endotracheal intubation was performed. The maintenance of anesthesia was provided by 40 % O2 + 60 % N2O, 1-2 % sevoflurane and 50 µg fentanyl + 2 mg vecuronium every 45 minutes in the first group. In the second group, 60 % dry air was used instead of 60 % N2O. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of HR, SpO2, SBP, MBP, ETCO2, body temperature, nausea-vomiting and IAP. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we think that N2O usage during the general anesthesia in patients without intraabdominal problems may increase IAP level for some degree whereas it does not increase PONV. In addition, N2O usage does not change ETCO2 values (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 32).

Preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: refresh your knowledge of how to recognize and respond to this common complication.

For surgical patients, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most undesired complications of anesthesia and surgery.

Multimodal therapies for postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain are two of the major concerns for patients presenting for surgery. The causes of PONV are multifactorial and can largely be categorized as patient risk factors, anaesthetic technique, and surgical procedure. Antiemetics work on several different receptor sites to prevent or treat PONV. This is probably why numerous studies have now demonstrated that using more than one antiemetic is usually more effective and results in fewer side-effects than simply increasing the dose of a single antiemetic. A multimodal approach to PONV should not be limited to drug therapy alone but should involve a holistic approach starting before operation and continuing intraoperatively with risk reduction strategies to which are added prophylactic antiemetics according to the assessed patient risk for PONV. With the increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of acute pain, especially the occurrence of peripheral and central hypersensitization, it is unlikely that a single drug or intervention is sufficiently broad in its action to be adequately effective, especially with moderate or greater pain. Although morphine and its congeners are usually the foundation of pain management regimens, as their dose increases so does the incidence of side-effects. Thus, the approach for the management of acute postoperative pain is to use multiple drugs or modalities (e.g. regional anaesthesia) to maximize pain relief and reduce side-effects.

Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that women emerge faster from general anaesthesia than men, and differ in their postoperative recovery profile. The extent and underlying mechanisms for these sex-related differences in general anaesthesia are unclear. METHODS: In a multicentre, prospective, matched cohort study, 500 ASA physical status I or II patients of either sex undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were recruited. All subjects received a general anaesthetic through inhalation. Anaesthetic drugs and doses used, bispectral index (BIS) scores, recovery times, pain scores, and 40-item quality of recovery (QoR-40) scores for 3 days after general anaesthesia were recorded. RESULTS: Women had higher BIS scores at similar concentrations of anaesthesia (P<0.05). Time to eye-opening (P<0.01) and time to obeying commands (P<0.01) were shorter in women. Duration of recovery room stay was longer in women, who also had higher pain scores and need for treatment of nausea and vomiting (all P<0.001). QoR-40 scores for the first 3 days after general anaesthesia were lower in women (P<0.001). Plasma progesterone concentrations in women negatively correlated with the time to eye-opening (ρ=-0.53, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient sex is an independent factor influencing the response to anaesthesia and recovery after surgery. Women emerged faster from general anaesthesia but their overall quality of recovery was poorer. Female sex hormones, particularly progesterone, might be involved, with premenopausal women having faster recovery time but poor overall recovery.

Rolapitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after surgery. Neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) receptor antagonists have been shown to be safe and effective for the prevention and treatment of PONV in humans. Rolapitant is a potent, selective NK1 receptor antagonist that is rapidly absorbed, has a remarkably long half-life (up to180 hours), and appears to have a low potential for drug-drug interactions. We evaluated the dose response for rolapitant for the prevention of PONV in subjects at high risk for this condition, and rolapitant's effects on preventing delayed PONV were explored up to 5 days after surgery. METHODS: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, dose-ranging study of rolapitant was conducted with placebo and active control groups. Six hundred nineteen adult women undergoing open abdominal surgery were randomly assigned in equal ratios to 1 of 6 study arms: oral rolapitant in 5-mg, 20-mg, 70-mg, or 200-mg doses; IV ondansetron 4 mg; or placebo, stratified by history of PONV or motion sickness. The primary study endpoint was absence of emetic episodes, regardless of use of rescue medication, at 24 hours after extubation. RESULTS: Groups assigned to rolapitant 20-mg, 70-mg, and 200-mg had a higher incidence of no emesis in comparison with placebo at 24 hours after surgery. A linear relationship between rolapitant dose and primary outcome was seen. The probability of an emetic episode was significantly lower in the rolapitant 70-mg and 200-mg groups in comparison with placebo (P ≤ 0.001 based on the log-rank test). No significant differences were noted between rolapitant and the active control (ondansetron) at 24 hours after surgery, but there was a higher incidence of no emesis (regardless of rescue medication use) in the rolapitant 200- and 70-mg groups at 72 and 120 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rolapitant is superior to placebo in reducing emetic episodes after surgery and reduces the incidence of vomiting in a dose-dependent manner. No differences in side effect profile were observed between rolapitant and placebo.

The efficacy of several neuromuscular monitoring modes at the P6 acupuncture point in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we tested the efficacy of several neuromuscular monitoring modes at the P6 acupuncture point for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 264 women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were evaluated for PONV. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by acceleromyography with 1-Hz single twitch (ST) over the ulnar nerve (n = 54, control), and ST (n = 52), train-of-four (n = 53), double-burst stimulation (n = 53), or tetanus (n = 52) over the median nerve stimulating at the P6 acupuncture point. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV (P = 0.022), the number of requests for patient-controlled analgesia (P = 0.009), and total patient-controlled analgesia volume (P = 0.042) 6 hours after tetanic stimulation were significantly reduced in the treatment group compared with the control group. Overall, patients in the tetanus group were more satisfied with the management of PONV compared with patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: Tetanic stimulation applied to the P6 acupuncture point can reduce PONV after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with ST stimulation of the ulnar nerve, resulting in a greater degree of patient satisfaction. None of the stimulations, ST, train-of-four, or double-burst, applied to the P6 acupuncture point significantly affected PONV.

Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of fast-track surgery (enhanced recovery programs) has been evolved and been documented to be successful by decreasing length of stay, morbidity and convalescence across procedures. FUTURE STRATEGIES: However, there are several possibilities for further improvement of most of the components of fast-track surgery, where surgical stress, fluid and pain management are key factors. There is an urgent need for better design of studies, especially in minimal invasive surgery to achieve maximal outcome effects when integrated into the fast-track methodology.

The effect of paracetamol on postoperative nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h after strabismus surgery: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.

CONTEXT: Strabismus surgery is one of the most common ophthalmic surgical procedures in children and is associated with significant postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of intravenous paracetamol on PONV in children after strabismus surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised double-blind study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety children, between 2 and 14 years scheduled for strabismus surgery, were recruited. Eighty-six completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of anaesthesia, intravenous dexamethasone 0.1 mg kg was administered to all. The patients were enrolled to receive either intravenous physiological saline (group S) or paracetamol 15 mg kg (group P). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of PONV in the first 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: General and clinical characteristics of the children were similar in both groups. PONV during the first 24 h was significantly higher in group S in comparison with group P (group S vs. group P, 33 vs. 14.6%, respectively, P = 0.038 for nausea; 24.4 vs. 7.3%, respectively, P = 0.030 for vomiting). The number of analgesic administrations during the first 24 h was higher in group S compared with group P (1.31 ±â€Š0.85 and 0.73 ±â€Š0.6, respectively, P = 0.001). The repeat number of postoperative analgesic administrations was significantly different between groups during the first 24 h (P = 0.005), but during 24-48 h was not significant. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative administration of intravenous paracetamol decreases the incidence of PONV during the first 24 h in children after strabismus surgery.

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative vomiting (POV), post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV), and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) continue to be causes of pediatric morbidity, delay in discharge, and unplanned hospital admission. Research on the pathophysiology, risk assessment, and therapy for PDNV, OINV and pain therapy options in children has received increased attention. Multimodal pain management with the use of perioperative regional and opioid-sparing analgesia has helped decrease nausea and vomiting. Two common emetogenic surgical procedures in children are adenotonsillectomy and strabismus repair. Although PONV risk factors differ between adults and children, the approach to decrease baseline risk is similar. As PONV and POV are frequent in children, antiemetic prophylaxis should be considered for those at risk. A multimodal approach for antiemetic and pain therapy involves preoperative risk evaluation and stratification, antiemetic prophylaxis, and pain management with opioid-sparing medications and regional anesthesia. Useful antiemetics include dexamethasone and serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists such as ondansetron. Multimodal combination prophylactic therapy using two or three antiemetics from different drug classes and propofol total intravenous anesthesia should be considered for children at high PONV risk. "Enhanced recovery after surgery" protocols include a multimodal approach with preoperative preparation, adequate intravenous fluid hydration, opioid-sparing analgesia, and prophylactic antiemetics. PONV guidelines and management algorithms help provide effective postoperative care for pediatric patients.