Advancing glenohumeral dysplasia treatment in brachial plexus birth injury: the end-to-side spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer technique.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD. METHODS: We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients. RESULTS: At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD. CONCLUSION: In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.

Selective nerve transfers to restore shoulder abduction and flexion in acute flaccid myelitis: A case report.

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a polio-like condition predominantly affecting children that is characterized by acute-onset, asymmetric flaccid paralysis, often preceded by a prodromal fever or viral illness. With prompt diagnosis and early surgical referral, nerve transfers may be performed to improve function. Highly selective nerve transfers are ideal to preserve existing functions while targeting specific deficits. In this report, we present a case of a double fascicular nerve transfer of median and ulnar nerve fascicles to the axillary nerve, combined with selective transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the supraspinatus branch of the suprascapular nerve, performed for a 5-year-old girl who developed AFM after an upper respiratory infection. Six months after the onset of the patient's symptoms, the patient had continued weakness of shoulder flexion and abduction, atrophy of the deltoid, and supraspinatus muscles, though needle electromyography revealed a functioning infraspinatus muscle. The patient had no post-operative complications and at 2 years of postoperative follow up achieved shoulder abduction and flexion Active Movement Scale scores of 7/7 compared to preoperative scores of 2/7, with no loss of function in the donor nerve domains. The patient showed active shoulder abduction against gravity to 90° from 30° preoperatively and shoulder flexion to 180° from 15° preoperatively. This case report shows that highly selective nerve transfers may preserve existing functions while targeting specific deficits. A double fascicular transfer from the median and ulnar nerves to axillary nerve may provide abundant axons for functional recovery.

Functional and morphological evaluation of the trapezius muscle after spinal accessory nerve transfer to brachial plexus nerves.

INTRODUCTION: The main innervation of the trapezius muscle is provided by the spinal accessory nerve. Several studies describe the contributions of cervical plexus roots to the trapezius muscle innervation, either directly or through connections with the spinal accessory nerve. There is no adequate understanding of how the trapezius muscle is affected after using the spinal accessory nerve in nerve transfer procedures with the usual technique, preserving at least 1 branch for the upper trapezius. METHODS: We evaluated 20 patients with sequelae of traumatic brachial plexus injury who underwent surgical procedures for brachial plexus repair or free muscle transfer, which included the spinal accessory nerve transfer technique and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. The three portions trapezius muscle were evaluated by physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (analysis of fatty degeneration) and electromyography. RESULTS: In all evaluation methods, the middle and lower portions of the trapezius muscle showed more significant morphological and/or functional impairment than the upper portion, in most cases. There was a statistically significant difference in all the complementary exams results, between the affected side (with sacrifice of the nerve) versus the normal side, in the middle and lower portions of the trapezius muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination alone is not sufficient to determine the residual functionality of the trapezius muscle. Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography are useful tools to assess both morphological involvement of the trapezius muscle and nerve conduction impairment of the trapezius muscle, respectively. The results suggest that the middle and lower portions of the trapezius muscle are affected by previous SAN transfer and should be considered with caution for further muscle transfer procedures.

Post-operative progress of arm abduction function and rate of lymph node metastasis around the region of the accessory nerve: a multicentre prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Although neck dissection is an essential technique in the surgical treatment of head and neck carcinoma, arm abduction disorders occurring after neck dissection reduce the patient's quality of life. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the rate of lymph node metastasis in Levels IIB and V in head and neck cancer patients who underwent neck dissection at eight centres in Japan. In addition, post-operative arm abduction disability was classified according to functional assessment values at 1 month post-operatively, and the rate of maintained function at 6 and 12 months was evaluated. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis occurred in Level IIB in 12 of 242 cases (4.9%) and in Level V in 5 cases (2.1%) during the 12-month post-operative course. In patients with preservation of the ipsilateral accessory nerve, arm abduction function was maintained in 142 of 209 patients (67.9%) at 12 months after surgery. Post-operative radiotherapy and Level V dissection had no statistically significant effect on the recovery of arm abduction function. Level V dissection caused a temporary loss of abduction function post-operatively. A higher arm abduction test score at 1 month post-operatively was associated with a higher rate of subsequent ability to maintain arm abduction function. CONCLUSIONS: In patients classified as cN0, metastatic rate at Levels IIB and V was low. In this cohort, omitting Level V dissection may be an option in strategies aimed at maintaining arm abduction function.

Phrenic Nerve as an Alternative Donor for Nerve Transfer to Restore Shoulder Abduction in Severe Multiple Root Injuries of the Adult Brachial Plexus.

PURPOSE: Nerve transfer is the gold standard to restore shoulder abduction in acute brachial plexus injuries. The aim of this study was to compare the phrenic nerve (Ph) to the spinal accessory nerve (XI) as the donor nerve for this purpose. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 136 patients with acute brachial plexus injuries who received a nerve transfer of the shoulder with either the Ph (94 patients) or XI (42 patients). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups based on the recipient nerve. The maximum degree of shoulder abduction was recorded after 2 years of postoperative follow-up. A generalized estimating equation model was performed to examine the variables affecting shoulder abduction over time. RESULTS: The maximum degrees of shoulder abduction achieved were 61.9° ± 38.7° in patients with Ph and 51.1° ± 37.3° in patients with XI. More than M3 shoulder abduction was achieved by 67% of patients with Ph versus 59% of patients with XI. The regression analysis showed that the age at the time of surgery correlated more with the functional outcome over time than the choice of donor nerve. CONCLUSIONS: In multiple root brachial plexus injuries, the Ph exhibited similar outcomes to the XI for shoulder abduction. Our routine exploration of the supraclavicular plexus exposes the Ph conveniently for nerve transfer. The phrenic nerve should be considered as an alternative when the XI is not available or is reserved for secondary reconstruction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Possible donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstruction in dual neurotization for restoring shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Restoring shoulder abduction is one of the main priorities in the surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Double nerve transfer to the axillary nerve and suprascapular nerve is widely used and considered the best option. The most common donor nerve for the suprascapular nerve is the spinal accessory nerve. However, donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstructions vary and it is still unclear which donor nerve has the best outcome. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on reconstructions of suprascapular and axillary nerves and to perform a meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of different donor nerves on axillary nerve reconstructions. We conducted a systematic search of English literature from March 2001 to December 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Two outcomes were assessed, abduction strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-two studies describing the use of donor nerves met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Donor nerves investigated included the radial nerve, intercostal nerves, medial pectoral nerve, ulnar nerve fascicle, median nerve fascicle and the lower subscapular nerve. Fifteen studies that investigated the radial and intercostal nerves met the inclusion criteria for a meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between either of these nerves in the abduction strength according to MRC score (radial nerve 3.66 ± 1.02 vs intercostal nerves 3.48 ± 0.64, p = 0.086). However, the difference in ROM was statistically significant (radial nerve 106.33 ± 39.01 vs. intercostal nerve 80.42 ± 24.9, p < 0.001). Our findings support using a branch of the radial nerve for the triceps muscle as a donor for axillary nerve reconstruction when possible. Intercostal nerves can be used in cases of total brachial plexus injury or involvement of the C7 root or posterior fascicle. Other promising methods need to be studied more thoroughly in order to validate and compare their results with the more commonly used methods.

Triceps to teres minor motor nerve transfer to restore glenohumeral external rotation after neonatal brachial plexus injury.

INTRODUCTION: Attaining active glenohumeral external rotation (aGHER), whether via primary reconstruction or spontaneous recovery, is infrequent in patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPI). We evaluated the effectiveness of triceps-to-teres minor motor branch transfers to restore this function, both performed primarily (i.e., in conjunction with microsurgical plexus reconstruction) or secondarily (after primary surgery has failed to restore aGHER). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 12 children with NBPI undergoing triceps-to-teres minor motor branch transfer via an axillary approach, six undergoing primary surgery and six secondary. The primary outcome was post-operative restoration of aGHER in abduction. The primary-surgery group consisted of six children of mean age 8 months (range 5-11) with partial injuries ranging from C5-C6 to C5-C8. The secondary-surgery group included six patients with C5-C6 injuries of mean age 43 months (range 23-120), undergoing re-operation a mean 40 months (range 18-116) after their primary surgery. RESULTS: No complications occurred after surgery. At a mean follow-up of 22 months (range 14-30), aGHER in abduction only was restored in one patient in the primary group while in the secondary group, aGHER in abduction was restored in all patients to a mean 73° (range 70-80) after a mean follow-up of 16 months (range 6-26). CONCLUSIONS: Triceps-to-teres minor motor branch transfer is not indicated as primary surgery for NBPI. However, they can be effective in children in whom primary surgery has failed to restore aGHER, even if the spinal accessory nerve is unavailable for transfer to the infraspinatus motor branch.

A Cadaveric Study on the Utility of the Levator Scapulae Motor Nerve as a Donor for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the utility of the levator scapulae motor nerve (LSN) as a donor nerve for brachial plexus nerve transfer. We hypothesized that the LSN could be transferred to the suprascapular nerve (SSN) or long thoracic nerve (LTN) with a reliable tension-free coaptation and appropriate donor-to-recipient axon count ratio. METHODS: Twelve brachial plexus dissections were performed on 6 adult cadavers, bilaterally. We identified the LSN, spinal accessory nerve (SAN), SSN, and LTN. Each nerve was prepared for transfer and nerve redundancies were calculated. Cross-sections of each nerve were examined histologically, and axons counted. We transferred the LSN to target first the SSN and then the LTN, in a tension-free coaptation. For reference, we transferred the distal SAN to target the SSN and LTN and compared transfer parameters. RESULTS: Three cadavers demonstrated 2 LSN branches supplying the levator scapulae. The axon count ratio of donor-to-recipient nerve was 1:4.0 (LSN:SSN) and 1:2.1 (LSN:LTN) for a single LSN branch and 1:3.0 (LSN:SSN) and 1:1.6 (LSN:LTN) when 2 LSN branches were available. Comparatively, the axon count ratio of donor-to-recipient nerve was 1:2.5 and 1:1.3 for the SAN to the SSN and the LTN, respectively. The mean redundancy from the LSN to the SSN and the LTN was 1.7 cm (SD, 3.1 cm) and 2.9 cm (SD, 2.8 cm), and the redundancy from the SAN to the SSN and the LTN was 4.5 (SD, 0.7 cm) and 0.75 cm (SD, 1.0 cm). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of the LSN as a potential donor for direct nerve transfer to the SSN and LTN, given its adequate redundancy and size match. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The LSN should be considered as an alternative nerve donor source for brachial plexus reconstruction, especially in 5-level injuries with scarce donor nerves. If used in lieu of the SAN during primary nerve reconstruction, trapezius tendon transfer for improved external rotation would be enabled.

Differences in strength fatigue when using different donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of elbow flexion strength fatigue, rather than the maximal power of strength, after brachial plexus re-innervation with phrenic and spinal accessory nerves. We designed a simple but specific test to study whether statistical differences were observed among those two donor nerves. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe brachial plexus palsy for which either phrenic nerve (PN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer was performed. A dynamometer was used to determine the maximal contraction strength. One and two kilograms circular weights were utilized to measure isometrically the duration of submaximal and near-maximal contraction time. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with a PN transfer while 7 with a SAN transfer for elbow flexion. The mean time from trauma to surgery was 7.1 months for spinal accessory nerve versus 5.2 for phrenic nerve, and the mean follow-up was 57.7 and 38.6 months, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a quicker fatigue for the PN, such that patients with the SAN transfer could hold weights of 1 kg and 2 kg for a mean of 91.0 and 61.6 s, respectively, while patients with transfer of the phrenic nerve could hold 1 kg and 2 kg weights for just a mean of 41.7 and 19.6 s, respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (at p = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). Upon correlation analysis, endurances at 1 kg and 2 kg were strongly correlated, with r = 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that phrenic to musculocutaneous nerve transfer showed an increased muscular fatigue when compared with spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous transfer. Further studies designed to analyze this relation should be performed to increase our knowledge about strength endurance/fatigue and muscle re-innervation.

Intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in patients with complete traumatic brachial plexus injuries: case series.

BACKGROUND: To recover biceps strength in patients with complete brachial plexus injuries, the intercostal nerve can be transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. The surgical results are very controversial, and most of the studies with good outcomes and large samples were carried out in Asiatic countries. The objective of the study was to evaluate biceps strength after intercostal nerve transfer in patients undergoing this procedure in a Western country hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients from 2011 to 2016 with traumatic brachial plexus injuries receiving intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in a rehabilitation hospital. The biceps strength was graded using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale. The variables reported and analyzed were age, the time between trauma and surgery, surgeon experience, body mass index, nerve receptor (biceps motor branch or musculocutaneous nerve), and the number of intercostal nerves transferred. Statistical tests, with a significance level of 5%, were used. RESULTS: Biceps strength recovery was graded ≥M3 in 19 patients (48.8%) and M4 in 15 patients (38.5%). There was no statistical association between biceps strength and the variables. The most frequent complication was a pleural rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer is a safe procedure. Still, biceps strength after surgery was ≥M3 in only 48.8% of the patients. Other donor nerve options should be considered, e.g., the phrenic or spinal accessory nerves.

The Effect of Distal Transfer of the Spinal Accessory Nerve to the Suprascapular Nerve on the Shoulder Reanimation in Spontaneously Partially Recovered Obstetric Brachial Plexus Lesion.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous recovery of elbow flexion in obstetric brachial plexus palsy at 4 to 6 months of age is sufficient to exclude the child from the early microsurgical intervention. However, lack of complete active external rotation of shoulder is a common finding in such cases despite ongoing other arm and shoulder functions. Nerve transfer is proposed to manage such cases before the age of 18 months. AIM: The aim of this study was to study the distal transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve through posterior approach and its effect on the shoulder reanimation in patients with obstetric brachial plexus lesion who had spontaneously recovered biceps function but not shoulder function before the age of 18 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 20 patients admitted to Elhadra University Hospital with obstetric brachial plexus lesion aged between 10 and 18 months with spontaneous recovery of biceps function, weak active shoulder abduction grade 4 or grade 5 and deficient active shoulder external rotation. All patients were assessed preoperative and postoperative by Active Movement Scale. RESULTS: Active shoulder external rotation improved in all patients at the end of follow-up period, whereas the shoulder abduction improved in 80%. Early surgery in patient younger than 16 months shows better results. CONCLUSIONS: The distal transfer of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve is an effective method for active shoulder abduction and external rotation recovery in spontaneously recovered elbow flexion in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Better results are obtained in patients younger than 16 months old. Early transfer balances the forces around the shoulder joint, preventing shoulder internal rotation contracture.

Transfers of the Ipsilateral C7 Plus the Spinal Accessory Nerve Versus Triple Nerve Transfers for Treatment of C5-C6 Avulsion of the Brachial Plexus.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term results of transfers of the ipsilateral C7 (IC7) plus spinal accessory nerve (SAN) with those of triple nerve transfers (TNT) using one fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch (Oberlin's procedure), SAN transferred to the suprascapular nerve, and transfer of the long head of triceps nerve branch to the anterior branch of axillary nerve to treat C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus. METHODS: The IC7 group included 9 patients undergoing transfers of IC7 to the upper trunk and SAN to the suprascapular nerve. Median age at surgery was 26 years and interval between injury and surgery was 2.8 months. Patients were observed for a median of 118 months. The TNT group contained 13 patients, median age 33 years; interval between injury and surgery was 3.1 months. Patients were observed for a median of 103 months. RESULTS: In the IC7 group, median shoulder abduction was 105° and median external rotation of the shoulder was 64°, which was similar to that of the TNT group (89° abduction and 58° external rotation). Eight of nine patients recovered at least M3 (Modified Narakas scale) strength of deltoid in the IC7 group, which was similar to that in the TNT group (11 of 13 patients). Six of nine patients achieved at least Medical Research Council grade 3 (MRC3) strength of biceps in the IC7 group, which was similar to that in the TNT group (11 of 13 patients). Of 4 patients in the IC7 group with a preoperative latissimus dorsi strength of MRC3 or less, 3 gained a deltoid strength of M3 or less, and 3 a biceps strength of MRC2 or less. CONCLUSIONS: Transfers of IC7 plus SAN provide results comparable to those of TNT for treatment of C5-C6 avulsion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The extent of brachial plexus injury: an important factor in spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between extent of brachial plexus injury and shoulder abduction/external rotation outcomes after spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting outcomes on patients undergoing SAN to SSN nerve transfer. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: age under 18, nerve transfer for reanimation of the shoulder other than SAN to SSN, and less than 12 months of follow-up postoperatively. Pooled analysis was performed, and primary outcomes were Medical Research Council (MRC) score and range of motion (ROM) for shoulder abduction and external rotation. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between extent of brachial plexus injury and shoulder abduction/external rotation outcomes after SAN to SSN transfer. A multivariate logistic regression analysis model including age, injury to surgery interval, and extent of injury as factors was also created.Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis showed greater extent of injury to be a predictor of poorer shoulder abduction outcomes (OR: 0.502; 95% CI: 0.260-0.971, p = 0.040). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed this association (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.236-0.877, p = 0.019). Extent of injury was not significantly associated with external rotation outcomes on univariate analysis (OR: 0.435; 95% CI: 0.095-1.995, p = 0.284) or multivariate analysis (OR: 0.445; 95% CI: 0.097-2.046, p = 0.298). Age and injury to surgery interval were not significantly associated with postoperative outcomes.Conclusions: More extensive brachial plexus injuries are associated with inferior outcomes after SAN to SSN transfer. A potential explanation for this finding includes lost contribution of muscles from the shoulder girdle that receive innervation from outside of the upper brachial plexus. The relationship between extent of injury and postoperative outcomes is important to recognize when determining and discussing operative intervention with patients.

Functioning Free Muscle Transfer for Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis Comparing Functional Outcomes of Intercostal Nerve and Spinal Accessory Nerve Grafts.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative elbow flexion outcomes in patients receiving functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) innervated by either intercostal nerve (ICN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) grafts. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review on FFMT for brachial plexus reconstruction was conducted utilizing Medline/PubMed database. Analysis was designed to compare functional outcomes between (1) nerve graft type (ICN vs. SAN) and (2) different free muscle graft types to biceps tendon (gracilis vs. rectus femoris vs. latissimus dorsi). RESULTS: A total of 312 FFMTs innervated by ICNs (169) or the SAN (143) are featured in 10 case series. The mean patient age was 28 years. Patients had a mean injury to surgery time of 31.5 months and an average follow-up time of 39.1 months with 18 patients lost to follow-up. Muscles utilized included the gracilis (275), rectus femoris (28), and latissimus dorsi (8). After excluding those lost to follow-up or failures due to vascular compromise, the mean success rates of FFMTs innervated by ICNs and SAN were 64.1 and 65.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis did not identify any difference in outcomes between FFMTs via ICN grafts and those innervated by SAN grafts in restoring elbow flexion in traumatic brachial plexus injury patients.

Microvascular decompression with partial occipital condylectomy in a case of pediatric spasmodic torticollis.

Spasmodic torticollis is a rare, neurologic disorder that is caused by abnormal nerve compression of the 11th cranial nerve by blood vessels or bony protrusions. It is typically treated pharmacologically and, if necessary, with surgical intervention. We report a unique case of spasmodic torticollis in a 15-year-old female that involved abnormal compression of the left 11th cranial nerve (CN) by the left vertebral artery, displaced by a hypertrophic left occipital condyle. After treatment with Botox was unsuccessful, the patient was treated with microvascular decompression and occipital condylectomy that adequately relieved the abnormal compression of CN XI. Mild symptoms persisted, and the patient underwent a partial section of the sternocleidomastoid muscle 1 year later, after which torticollis symptoms resolved.

Comparative study of single and dual nerve transfers for repairing shoulder abduction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of single and dual nerve transfer for the repair of shoulder abduction in patients with upper or upper and middle trunk root avulsion. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with C5-C6 or C5-C7 root avulsion treated by nerve transfer in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different operation methods. In group A, ten patients had transferred the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Ten patients in group B underwent dual nerve transfer to reconstruct shoulder abduction, including the spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and two intercostal nerves or the long head of triceps nerve branch transfer to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. There was no difference in age, preoperative interval, follow-up time, and injury type between the two groups. We used shoulder abduction strength, shoulder abduction angle, and Samardzic's shoulder joint evaluation standard as the postoperative evaluation index. Shoulder abductor muscle strength equals or above M3 was considered to be an effective recovery. RESULTS: Of the 20 cases, 15 obtained equals or more M3 of shoulder abduction strength, and the overall effective rate was 75%. The effective rate of shoulder abduction power in group A was 60% (6/10) while group B was 90% (9/10); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The average shoulder abduction angle was 55° (SD = 19.29) in group A and 77° (SD = 20.44) in group B; the angle was significantly better in group B than that in group A (p < 0.05). Based on Samardzic's standard, the excellent and good rate of group A was 90% and in group B was 50%. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients with nerve root avulsion of C5-C6 or C5-C7, repairing suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve at the same time is more effective than repairing suprascapular nerve alone in terms of shoulder abduction angle and excellent rate of functional recovery of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we recommend the repair of the suprascapular nerve and the axillary nerve simultaneously if conditions permit.

Suprascapular Ligament Release From an Anterior Approach: An Anatomic Feasibility Study.

PURPOSE: The results of spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers have been less reliable than other nerve transfers in the upper limb, possibly owing to compression of the nerve by the suprascapular ligament. The posterior approach has been advocated to allow for release of the ligament. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a ligament release is possible from the anterior approach. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen cadavers were dissected to determine whether the ligament could be approached and released from the anterior approach. Complete ligament release was demonstrated by subluxation of the nerve out of the suprascapular notch. RESULTS: Ligament release was achieved in all specimens, although in one, confirmation of complete release required a posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: Release of the suprascapular ligament to eliminate a potential source of compression of the suprascapular nerve during spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer is possible through an anterior approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Release of the suprascapular ligament through an anterior approach allows this procedure to be performed through the same approach as brachial plexus exploration and spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer. This method could reduce surgical time and patient repositioning and avoid additional incisions.

Outcomes of Spinal Accessory-to-Suprascapular Nerve Transfers for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: The results of a spinal accessory nerve-to-suprascapular (SAN-SSN) nerve transfer for brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBIs) have thus far been presented only in limited case series. Our study evaluates the recovery of shoulder function of patients who underwent an SAN-SSN for BPBI as an isolated procedure or as part of a multinerve reconstruction (MNR) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at a single institution who underwent an SAN-SSN after BPBI. Inclusion criteria were patients with both preoperative and a minimum 12-months postoperative active movement scale (AMS) scores. Patients for whom the primary surgery involved tendon transfers were excluded. The primary outcome measures were AMS scores for shoulder abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation and secondary outcomes included the need for further shoulder surgery to improve function. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (58.9%) obtained functional shoulder motion (AMS ≥ 6) of at least 1 of 3 planes (abduction/flexion/external rotation) following surgery, with 13 patients (17.8%) achieving full recovery of 1 of these shoulder motions against gravity (AMS = 7). Fifty-six patients (76.7%) did not undergo subsequent tendon transfers or corrective osteotomies to augment shoulder function. The MNR procedures were performed in 46 patients (63%), of whom 45.7% gained a functional recovery. In 27 patients for whom SAN-SSN nerve transfer was conducted in isolation, 81.5% gained functional shoulder motion. However, isolated SAN-SSNs were conducted at a later age than MNR procedures (13.2 vs 4.8 months) and had higher preoperative AMS scores. The anterior and posterior approaches for SAN-SSN were both found to be effective when used for SAN-SSN in BPBI. When the follow-up duration cutoff was set to 3 years, the outcomes were found to be superior. CONCLUSIONS: In 76.7% of the patients, SAN-SSN was able to recover function that was sufficient to prevent tendon transfers and corrective osteotomies. A cutoff of 3 postoperative years should be used as a benchmark for analyzing the results of this procedure. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Anatomic Alert: Spinal accessory nerve traversing a fenestrated internal jugular vein.

We present a case of the spinal accessory nerve traversing a fenestrated internal jugular vein. Awareness of this variant may be important in neurosurgical procedures that involve upper cervical exposures.

Functional outcome of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder function: Results in upper and complete traumatic brachial plexus palsy in adults.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder stability, abduction and external rotation are vital for the performance of usual daily tasks. AIMS: To compare the functional outcomes in the shoulder following spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer (SASNT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparison of the outcome of adult patients with upper traumatic brachial plexus palsy undergoing SASNT with patients with complete palsy submitted to the same procedure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Ranges of motion were compared via the Mann-Whitney U test. The percentages of patients with a favorable outcome were compared by the chi-square test. All tests were two-tailed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: SASNT was performed in 76 patients: 23 cases (30.2%) of upper-plexus injuries and 53 cases (69.7%) of complete brachial plexus palsy. Good shoulder abduction was achieved in 15 patients (65.2%) with upper plexus palsy and a good external rotation in 5 (21.7%). In those patients with a good recovery, the average range of motion (ROM) was 53° for shoulder abduction and 71.2° for external rotation. Thirty-six patients (67.9%) with complete palsy had a good shoulder abduction recovery with 30.7° of average ROM, but only 3 patients (5.6%) recovered a good shoulder external rotation with 68.3° of average ROM. There was no statistical difference for the abduction outcome, but the external rotation outcome was superior in the upper plexus palsy group. CONCLUSION: SASNT is a consistent procedure to achieve functional recovery of shoulder abduction after a partial or complete plexus injury, but the outcomes of external rotation were quite disappointing in both the groups.