Strategies for obstetricians and gynecologists to advance reproductive autonomy in a post-Roe landscape.

The monumental reversal of Roe vs Wade dramatically impacted the landscape of reproductive healthcare access in the United States. The decision most significantly affects communities that historically have been and continue to be marginalized by systemic racism, classism, and ableism within the medical system. To minimize the harm of restrictive policies that have proliferated since the Supreme Court overturned Roe, it is incumbent on obstetrician-gynecologists to modify practice patterns to meet the pressing reproductive health needs of their patients and communities. Change will require cross-discipline advocacy focused on advancing equity and supporting the framework of reproductive justice. Now, more than ever, obstetrician-gynecologists have a critical responsibility to implement new approaches to service delivery and education that will expand access to evidence-based, respectful, and person-centered family planning and early pregnancy care regardless of their practice location or subspecialty.

Neurologists' and obstetricians' perspectives and current practices in breastfeeding counseling in women with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to characterize practice patterns of neurologists and obstetricians in breastfeeding (BF) counseling in women with epilepsy (WWE) and explore factors that may influence physician counseling behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of neurologists and obstetricians via an anonymous survey from September 2021 until November 2021. A survey was developed to explore the following areas in WWE: current physicians' BF counseling patterns, physician-specific factors affecting BF counseling, and patient-specific factors and their impact on BF counseling. Descriptive statistics were generated for each survey question. Responses from neurologists and obstetricians were compared. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess factors that influence BF counseling in WWE. RESULTS: A total of 185 physicians participated in the study and consisted of 91 (49.2 %) neurologists, 83 (44.8 %) obstetricians, and 11 (6 %) participants from other specialties. Ninety-four percent (94 %) of neurologists and 92 % of obstetricians indicated that they provide BF safety counseling to WWE primarily during preconception and occasionally during pregnancy. Fifty-six percent of obstetricians reported being very comfortable with BF counseling in WWE, compared to 68 % of neurologists. Both groups rated research and clinical practice guidelines as two factors that have major impact on BF counseling; however, less than half (45 %) of neurologists are very familiar with the current literature and only a quarter (24 %) of obstetricians are very familiar with current literature regarding safety of BF in WWE. Regarding barriers to BF counseling, relative to neurologists, obstetricians believe that delivery of conflicting opinions among medical specialists about BF safety is a barrier that may impede effective BF counseling in WWE [OR = 2.78 (95 % CI: 1.30,5.95), adjusted p value (P = 0.008)]. SIGNIFICANCE: Variable knowledge of current literature in BF in WWE and low comfort levels in BF counseling among various specialists, as well as perceived inadequate data and clinical practice guidelines, may contribute to suboptimal BF counseling and impact health outcomes in WWE and their children.

Continuing the conversation: a cross-sectional study about the effects of work-related adverse events on the mental health of Dutch (resident) obstetrician-gynaecologists (ObGyns).

BACKGROUND: Obstetrician-Gynaecologists (ObGyns) frequently face work-related adverse events such as severe obstetric complications and maternal or neonatal deaths. In 2014, the WATER-1 study showed that ObGyns are at risk of developing work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while many hospitals lacked a professional support system. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the current prevalence of work-related traumatic events and mental health problems among Dutch ObGyns, as well as to examine the current and desired support. METHODS: In 2022, an online questionnaire was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG), including resident and attending ObGyns. The survey included questions about experienced work-related events, current and desired coping strategies, and three validated screening questionnaires for anxiety, depression, and PTSD (HADS, TSQ, and PCL-5). RESULTS: The response rate was 18.8% and 343 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Of the respondents, 93.9% had experienced at least one work-related adverse event, 20.1% had faced a complaint from the national disciplinary board, and 49.4% had considered leaving the profession at any moment in their career. The prevalence rates of clinically relevant anxiety, depression, and psychological distress were 14.3, 4.4, and 15.7%, respectively. The prevalence of work-related PTSD was 0.9% according to DSM-IV and 1.2% according to DSM-5. More than half of the respondents (61.3%) reported the presence of a structured support protocol or approach in their department or hospital, and almost all respondents (92.6%) rated it as sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The percentages of anxiety, depression, psychological distress and PTSD are comparable to the similar study performed in 2014. Most Dutch ObGyns experience adverse events at work, which can be perceived as traumatic and, in certain cases, may lead to the development of PTSD. Structured support after adverse work-related events is now available in almost two-thirds of workplaces, and was mostly experienced as good. Despite substantial improvements in the availability and satisfaction of professional support after work-related adverse events, the prevalence rates of mental problems remain considerable, and it is imperative to sustain conversation about the mental well-being of ObGyns.

Analysis of the obstetrician's posture and movements during a simulated forceps delivery.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a simulated forceps birth, and then to study the association of the obstetricians' experience with the technique adopted. METHOD: Fifty-seven volunteer obstetricians, 20 from the Limoges and 37 from the Poitiers University hospitals, were included in this multi-centric study. They were classified into 3 groups: beginners, intermediates, and experts, beginners having performed fewer than 10 forceps deliveries in real conditions, intermediates between 10 and 100, and experts more than 100. The posture and movements of the obstetricians were recorded between December 2020 and March 2021 using an optoelectronic motion capture system during simulated forceps births. Joint angles qualifying these postures and movements were analysed between the three phases of the foetal traction. These phases were defined by the passage of a virtual point associated with the forceps blade through two anatomical planes: the mid-pelvis and the pelvic outlet. Then, a consolidated ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) was applied to these data in order to objectify the existence of groups of similar behaviours. RESULTS: The AHC distinguished four different postures adopted when crossing the first plane and three different traction techniques. 48% of the beginners adopted one of the two raised posture, 22% being raised without trunk flexion and 26% raised with trunk flexion. Conversely, 58% of the experts positioned themselves in a "chevalier servant" posture (going down on one knee) and 25% in a "squatting" posture before initiating traction. The results also show that the joint movement amplitude tends to reduce with the level of expertise. CONCLUSION: Forceps delivery was performed in different ways, with the experienced obstetricians favouring postures that enabled observation at the level of the maternal perineum and techniques reducing movement amplitude. The first perspective of this work is to relate these different techniques to the traction force generated. The results of these studies have the potential to contribute to the training of obstetricians in forceps delivery, and to improve the safety of women and newborns.

AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: a qualitative study on obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making.

BACKGROUND: Given that AI-driven decision support systems (AI-DSS) are intended to assist in medical decision making, it is essential that clinicians are willing to incorporate AI-DSS into their practice. This study takes as a case study the use of AI-driven cardiotography (CTG), a type of AI-DSS, in the context of intrapartum care. Focusing on the perspectives of obstetricians and midwives regarding the ethical and trust-related issues of incorporating AI-driven tools in their practice, this paper explores the conditions that AI-driven CTG must fulfill for clinicians to feel justified in incorporating this assistive technology into their decision-making processes regarding interventions in labor. METHODS: This study is based on semi-structured interviews conducted online with eight obstetricians and five midwives based in England. Participants were asked about their current decision-making processes about when to intervene in labor, how AI-driven CTG might enhance or disrupt this process, and what it would take for them to trust this kind of technology. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize thematic codes that recurred in interviews to identify the issues that mattered most to participants. Topics and themes that were repeated across interviews were identified to form the basis of the analysis and conclusions of this paper. RESULTS: There were four major themes that emerged from our interviews with obstetricians and midwives regarding the conditions that AI-driven CTG must fulfill: (1) the importance of accurate and efficient risk assessments; (2) the capacity for personalization and individualized medicine; (3) the lack of significance regarding the type of institution that develops technology; and (4) the need for transparency in the development process. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy, efficiency, personalization abilities, transparency, and clear evidence that it can improve outcomes are conditions that clinicians deem necessary for AI-DSS to meet in order to be considered reliable and therefore worthy of being incorporated into the decision-making process. Importantly, healthcare professionals considered themselves as the epistemic authorities in the clinical context and the bearers of responsibility for delivering appropriate care. Therefore, what mattered to them was being able to evaluate the reliability of AI-DSS on their own terms, and have confidence in implementing them in their practice.

"It feels like you have to choose one or the other": a qualitative analysis of obstetrician focus groups on periviability counseling.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to gain knowledge and ascertain challenges about periviability counseling among obstetricians to inform curricular development. METHODS: Focus groups were utilized. A series of open-ended questions was posed to each group of obstetricians; responses were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were analyzed by two coders using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four focus groups were convened. Prominent themes included: (1) Obstetrician knowledge about neonatal outcomes is limited, (2) Periviability counseling is both time intensive and time-challenged, (3) Patient processing of information relies on the content, delivery and patient readiness, and (4) Obstetrician bias is toward advocating for maternal safety, which may run counter to parental instinct to "do everything." The last theme was specifically focused on the role of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Curricula focused on improving obstetrician periviability counseling should focus on neonatal outcomes, the role of cesarean delivery, and utilization of shared decision-making.

Guideline for gynecological practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2023 edition.

Twelve years after the first edition of The Guideline for Gynecological Practice, which was jointly edited by The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the 5th Revised Edition was published in 2023. The 2023 Guidelines includes 5 additional clinical questions (CQs), which brings the total to 103 CQ (12 on infectious disease, 30 on oncology and benign tumors, 29 on endocrinology and infertility and 32 on healthcare for women). Currently, a consensus has been reached on the Guidelines, and therefore, the objective of this report is to present the general policies regarding diagnostic and treatment methods used in standard gynecological outpatient care that are considered appropriate. At the end of each answer, the corresponding Recommendation Level (A, B, C) is indicated.

Attitude and experience of obstetricians and gynecologists toward eating disorders assessment and management in Japan: A nationwide survey.

AIM: To investigate the attitudes and experiences of obstetricians and gynecologists in treating women with eating disorders (EDs) in Japan. METHODS: Members of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology were invited to participate in a web-based survey from March 1 to 31, 2022. We asked about the attitudes of obstetricians and gynecologists toward women with weight loss-related amenorrhea and their experiences in treating EDs. We also assessed the characteristics of physicians who see many ED patients. RESULTS: A total of 662 ob/gyns. responded to the survey. While treating weight loss-related amenorrhea, 25.8% reported screening patients for EDs. 88.5% of respondents reported having treated ED patients. The main medical concerns described when treating pregnant women with ED were fetal growth restriction and preterm delivery. The most common type of ED encountered by participants in both perinatal and infertility care settings was anorexia nervosa. Characteristics of physicians who treated 10 or more EDs per year were being board certified in women's health care and not providing delivery services (OR = 4.809, 1.896). The most common comment regarding optimizing the management of patients with EDs in obstetrics and gynecology practice was the need to implement guidelines for ED management. CONCLUSIONS: Many obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan treat patients with ED. Standardized guidelines for the management of EDs for obstetricians and gynecologists are needed.

Abortion Stigma as a Barrier to Mifepristone Use among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Alabama for Early Pregnancy Loss.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to identify and characterize barriers to mifepristone use among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) for early pregnancy loss in a southern US state. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 19 OB-GYNs in Alabama who manage early pregnancy loss. The interviews explored participants' knowledge of and experience with mifepristone use for miscarriage management and abortion, along with barriers to and facilitators of clinical mifepristone use. The interviews were coded by multiple study staff using inductive and deductive thematic coding. RESULTS: Nearly all of the interviewees identified abortion-related stigma as a barrier to mifepristone use. Interviewees often attributed stigma to a lack of knowledge about the clinical use of mifepristone for early pregnancy loss. The stigmatization of mifepristone due to its association with abortion was related to religious and political objections. Many interviewees also described stigma associated with misoprostol use. Although providers believed that mifepristone use for abortion would not be accepted in their practice, most believed that mifepristone could be used successfully for miscarriage management after practice-wide education on its use. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone is strongly associated with abortion stigma among OB-GYNs in Alabama, which is a barrier to its use for miscarriage management. Interventions to decrease abortion stigma and associated stigma surrounding mifepristone are needed to optimize early pregnancy loss care.

Identifying the barriers faced by obstetricians and registrars in screening or enquiry of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: A systematic review of the primary evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionally affects women compared to men. The impact of IPV is amplified during pregnancy. Screening or enquiry in the antenatal outpatient setting regarding IPV has been fraught with barriers that prevent recognition and the ability to intervene. AIMS: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the barriers that face obstetricians/gynaecologists regarding enquiry of IPV in antenatal outpatient settings. The secondary objective was to determine facilitators. METHODS: Primary evidence was searched using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Maternity and Infant Care, PubMed and Proquest from 1993 to May 2023. The included studies comprised empirical studies published in English language targeting a population of doctors providing antenatal outpatient care. The review was PROSPERO-registered (CRD42020188994). Independent screening and review was performed by two authors. The findings were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Nine studies addressing barriers and two studies addressing facilitators were included: three focus-group or semi-structured interviews, six surveys and two randomised controlled trials. Barriers for providers centred at the system level (time, training), provider level (personal beliefs, cultural bias, experience) and provider-perceived patient level (fear of offending, patient readiness to disclose). Increased experience and the use of validated tools were strong facilitators. CONCLUSION: Barriers to screening reflect multi-level obstruction to the identification of women exposed to IPV. Although the antenatal outpatient clinic setting addresses a particular population vulnerable to IPV, the barriers for obstetricians are not unique. The use of validated cueing tools provides an evidence-based method to facilitate enquiry of IPV among antenatal women, assisting in identification by clinicians. Together with education and human resources, such aids build capacity in women and obstetric providers.

The personal experience of female obstetricians and gynaecologists with contraceptive use influences the guidance and prescription of contraceptive methods: a web-survey.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the personal experience of female obstetricians and gynaecologists (Obst/Gyns) who utilise contraceptive methods on the provision of these methods. METHODS: An anonymous online web-based survey was carried out with female Obst/Gyns. The instrument contained questions about their current and previous contraceptive methods use, factors that influenced the choice and satisfaction with the ongoing method, as well as the occurrence of adverse events. They were also asked whether the experience of any adverse events influenced their decision in prescribing any particular contraceptive method. RESULTS: 476/9000 (5.3%) female Obst/Gyns answered the survey. The most common contraceptive in use was the 52-mg levonorgestrel-intrauterine device (52-mg LNG-IUD) (34%), followed by non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception hormonal methods (21.2%). More than half of the respondents (57.6%) reported having some adverse effects and 18.7% reported that the personal experience of an adverse effect with the use of a contraceptive method influenced the prescription of that method. CONCLUSION: Half of female Obst/Gyns encountered adverse events linked to contraceptive usage. Additionally, almost one-fifth believe that their own encounter with adverse effects from a contraceptive method impacts their decision to prescribe the same method.

Almost one-fifth of the female obstetrics and gynaecologists that answered the online survey reported that the personal experience of an adverse effect with the use of a contraceptive method influenced the prescription of that method.

Trends in the Management of Miscarriages with the Implementation of the Volunteer Obstetrician Scheme in Selected Primary Health Care Centres in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Post-abortion care (PAC) is a crucial component of emergency obstetric care, and many of the primary health care centres (PHC) in the internally displaced person (IDP) camps and host communities in Maiduguri lack it. Improved access to high-quality PACs is essential for meeting the reproductive health needs of the IDPs and reducing the maternal morbidity and mortality that can result from miscarriages. OBJECTIVE: To determine the trend in managing miscarriages in the IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri and the impact of the volunteer obstetrician scheme (VOS) on PAC. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a longitudinal study in selected PHCs serving IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri. The study spanned five (5) years, and we compared the management of miscarriages and PAC services one year before the VOS project, two years during the project and two years after the project. During the two-year VOS project, staff manning the PHCs had supportive supervision with hands-on training on PAC. Chi-square for trend and odd ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used as appropriate to compare the trend in PAC services provided during the study period. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and eight (1808) women presented with miscarriages, and 1562 (86.4%) required uterine evacuation. Medical evacuation with oral misoprostol was offered to 974 (62.4%), and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was used in 422 (27.0%) of the women who needed uterine evacuation. There was a statistically significant rise in the use of medical evacuation throughout the study period (52.2% before VOS, and 71.4% by the second year of VOS) with ꭓ2=41.64 and P<0.001. In comparison, the use of MVA fell from 38.6% in 2015 to 27.7% in 2019 (ꭓ2=34.74 and P<0.001). Similar rising trends were also observed in postabortion family planning acceptance (ꭓ2=22.27, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Volunteer Obstetrician Scheme project appears to have improved PAC services, especially medical evacuation and family planning uptake in the PHCs in IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. We recommend task shifting of PAC services and periodic supportive supervision to ensure the quality of care.

CONTEXTE: Les soins après avortement (PAC) sont une composante cruciale des soins obstétricaux d'urgence, et de nombreux centres de soins de santé primaires (PHC) dans les camps de personnes déplacées internes (PDI) et les communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri en sont dépourvus. Un accès amélioré à des PAC de haute qualité est essentiel pour répondre aux besoins de santé reproductive des PDI et réduire la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles qui peuvent résulter des fausses couches. OBJECTIF: Déterminer la tendance dans la gestion des fausses couches dans les camps de PDI et les communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri et l'impact du Programme de bénévoles obstétriciens (VOS) sur la PAC. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons mené une étude longitudinale dans des PHC sélectionnés desservant des camps de PDI et des communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri. L'étude a duré cinq (5) ans, et nous avons comparé la gestion des fausses couches et les services de PAC un an avant le projet VOS, deux ans pendant le projet et deux ans après le projet. Pendant les deux ans du projet VOS, le personnel des PHC a bénéficié d'une supervision avec formation pratique sur la PAC. Le chi carré pour la tendance et le rapport de cotes avec un intervalle de confiance de 95% ont été utilisés, le cas échéant, pour comparer la tendance des services de PAC fournis pendant la période de l'étude. RÉSULTATS: Mille huit cent huit (1808) femmes ont présenté des fausses couches, et 1562 (86,4%) ont nécessité une évacuation utérine. Une évacuation médicale avec du misoprostol oral a été proposée à 974 (62,4%), et l'aspiration manuelle sous vide (AMV) a été utilisée chez 422 (27,0%) des femmes ayant besoin d'une évacuation utérine. On a observé une augmentation statistiquement significative de l'utilisation de l'évacuation médicale tout au long de la période de l'étude (52,2% avant le VOS et 71,4% la deuxième année du VOS) avec ꭓ2=41,64 et P<0,001. En revanche, l'utilisation de l'AMV est passée de 38,6% en 2015 à 27,7% en 2019 (ꭓ2=34,74 et P<0,001). Des tendances similaires à la hausse ont également été observées dans l'acceptation de la planification familiale après avortement (ꭓ2=22,27, P<0,001). CONCLUSION: Le projet de Programme de bénévoles obstétriciens semble avoir amélioré les services de PAC, en particulier l'évacuation médicale et l'acceptation de la planification familiale dans les PHC des camps de PDI et des communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri, dans l'État de Borno, au Nigéria. Nous recommandons de déléguer les services de PAC et une supervision de soutien périodique pour garantir la qualité des soins. MOTS-CLÉS: Communauté d'accueil, Camps de PDI, Aspiration manuelle sous vide, Évacuation médicale, Misoprostol, Soins après avortement.

[Ethical Attitudes and Handling in Prenatal Conflict Situations - A Survey among Obstetricians and Prenatal Diagnosticians in Germany]. / Ethische Haltungen und Umgang in pränatalen Konfliktsituationen ­ eine Umfrage unter Geburtshelfern und Pränataldiagnostikern in Deutschland.

OBJECTIVE: Various studies have shown that belonging to a professional group has an influence on ethical attitudes. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the attitudes and approaches of obstetrical specialists and prenatal diagnosticians in prenatal conflict situations. METHODS: Explorative cross-sectional online survey among tertiary perinatal care centers and prenatal diagnosticians with DEGUM Level II/III in Germany. The questionnaire included questions on ethical attitudes in the perinatal context and a case presentation of a fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome. RESULTS: The response rate was 57.1% (310/543). 55.5% of the respondents practiced both obstetrics and prenatal diagnostics, 24.5% exclusively prenatal diagnostics, and 14.2% purely obstetrics. 27% agreed with the statement "An uncertain prognosis justifies pregnancy termination". For complex fetal malformations joint interdisciplinary counseling was advocated by 98.3%. Addressing the option of postnatal palliative treatment in a case of a hypoplastic left heart syndrome was accepted by 84.3% across all professional groups, while mentioning fetocide was more frequently cited as an option by prenatal diagnosticians than by obstetricians (57.7% vs. 34.1%). CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary prenatal parental counseling in complex fetal malformations is uniformly advocated by prenatal diagnosticians and obstetricians in Germany. However, different ethical attitudes appear among specialists groups with regard to the option of termination of pregnancy.

Obstetricians are likely to elect for cesarean section in women with retained pelvic implants: a radiographic survey study.

PURPOSE: Women with a history of pelvic fracture undergo cesarean section (CS) at a higher rate than the general population. The purpose of our study is to query obstetricians on their preferences. METHODS: An electronic survey consisting of 22 radiographs of patients who underwent pelvic fixation was sent to obstetricians at 3 academic medical centers. For each radiograph, a hypothetical scenario was given, and the respondents were asked if they would elect for a vaginal delivery or CS. RESULTS: We collected 58 responses. The overall CS rate was 59%. Respondents were significantly more likely to elect for CS with trans-symphyseal fixation or sacroiliac fixation, independently (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Obstetricians are likely to elect for elective CS in the presence of pelvic implants especially in patients with trans-symphyseal and sacroiliac fixation. Based on there is an opportunity for collaboration between orthopedic trauma surgeons and obstetricians.

Training obstetrician gynaecologists in HIV PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis): a 2-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) training sessions for OBGYN (obstetrician gynaecologist) providers given underutilisation of PrEP among women despite a high HIV burden. METHODS: Three separate training sessions were held for providers in the OBGYN department at an academic medical centre in New York City from 2019 to 2021. The 1-hour training sessions were conducted by HIV specialists as in-person lectures or online live lectures. Participants were surveyed after the training on metrics of PrEP awareness, knowledge and comfort with management. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare difference in proportions of binomial variables and difference in means of Likert-scored answers pretraining and post-training events. RESULTS: 63 respondents completed the surveys. There were low rates (13%) of past PrEP prescription among the respondents, while awareness of PrEP as an HIV prevention strategy was high before (95%) and after (98%) the training. After the training, there was an increase in understanding the epidemiology of HIV transmission (40% to 97%, p<0.00), familiarity with the PrEP clinical trials (18% to 97%, p<0.00), comfort in determining PrEP candidacy (mean score 2.3 to 4.1, p<0.00) and comfort prescribing PrEP (mean score 2.0 to 3.6, p<0.00). After the trainings, the majority of participants reported feeling 'comfortable' or 'very comfortable' in determining candidacy for PrEP and prescribing PrEP with follow-up. CONCLUSION: Implementation of PrEP training courses for OBGYN providers increased knowledge and comfort in identifying and managing patients who may benefit from PrEP services. Increasing training among OBGYN providers serving women at risk for HIV infection is an effective tool to narrow gaps in PrEP access.

Assessing maternal cardiac function by obstetricians: technique and reference ranges.

BACKGROUND: A strong body of evidence has now coalesced indicating that some obstetrical syndromes may result from maladaptive responses of the maternal cardiovascular system. Longitudinal studies have shown that these changes are complex and present before the clinical recognition of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction, suggesting that hemodynamic maladaptation may play an etiologic role in obstetrical complications. Chronic hypertension is one of the most frequent complications of pregnancy, and recent evidence suggests that control of mild hypertension in early pregnancy improves outcome. The management of chronic hypertension can be improved by understanding specific cardiovascular hemodynamic abnormalities such as increased cardiac output or increased systemic vascular resistance, which can respond to either beta or calcium channel blockers, depending on the hemodynamic findings. Evaluation of maternal cardiac function has not been previously available to obstetrical healthcare providers using diagnostic ultrasound equipment used for fetal evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Obstetrical ultrasound machines may be configured for various probes (endovaginal, abdominal, 3D/4D, and cardiac). This study used a cardiac probe placed in the suprasternal notch to image and measure the descending aorta diameter and the velocity time integral using pulsed and continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnant women between 11 and 39 weeks of gestation. These measurements were followed by computation of maternal left ventricular preload, afterload, contractility, and blood flow. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. A total of 400 pregnant women were recruited between 11 and 39 weeks of gestation. Imaging of the maternal aortic arch was performed by placing a cardiac probe in the suprasternal notch to identify the aortic arch using 2D and color Doppler ultrasound. The end-systolic diameter of the aorta was measured at the junction of the left subclavian artery with the descending aorta, which was followed by insonation of the descending aorta to obtain the Doppler waveform. Following insonation of the descending aorta, measurements of the aortic diameter, velocity time integral, ejection time, mean pressure gradient, heart rate, maternal weight and height, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were entered into an Excel spreadsheet to compute the following: (1) preload measurements of stroke volume, stroke volume index, and stroke work index; (2) afterload measurements of systemic vascular resistance and the potential-to-kinetic energy ratio; (3) contractility measurements of inotropy and the Smith-Madigan inotropy index; and (4) blood flow measurements of cardiac output and the cardiac output index. Fractional polynomial regression analysis was performed for each of the above measurements using gestational age as the independent variable. RESULTS: The diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure decreased from 11 to 18 weeks of gestation and then increased until term. The afterload measurements demonstrated similar characteristics, as all values decreased from 11 weeks until the mid and late second trimester, after which all values increased until term. Changes in contractility demonstrated an increase from 11 weeks to 25 to 28 weeks, followed by a decline until term. Changes in blood flow demonstrated an increase from 11 to 27 weeks and then declined until term. The continuous wave Doppler values were greater than the pulsed Doppler values except for the contractility measurements. Examples of abnormal cardiac measurements were identified in pregnant patients with hypertension and fetal growth restriction. An Excel calculator was created to provide quick computation of z-score measurements and their corresponding centiles described in this study. CONCLUSION: The technique for evaluation of maternal cardiac function described in this study would allow screening of maternal left ventricular preload, afterload, contractility, and blood flow in the obstetrical clinical milieu once a cardiac probe is acquired for obstetrical ultrasound machines used for fetal evaluation. The above measurements would allow the clinician to select appropriate hypertensive medication on the basis of the results of the evaluation of the maternal left ventricle.

Ramadan fasting and pregnancy: an evidence-based guide for the obstetrician.

Pregnant Muslim women may be religiously exempt from fasting during the Islamic month of Ramadan, especially if there is concern for undue hardship or harm to maternal or fetal health. However, several studies demonstrate that most women still choose to fast during pregnancy and avoid discussing fasting with their providers. A targeted literature review of published studies on fasting during Ramadan and pregnancy or maternal and fetal outcomes was performed. We generally found little to no clinically significant effect of fasting on neonatal birthweight or preterm delivery. Conflicting data exist on fasting and mode of delivery. Fasting during Ramadan has been mainly associated with signs and symptoms of maternal fatigue and dehydration, with a minimal decrease in weight gain. There is conflicting data regarding the association with gestational diabetes mellitus and insufficient data on maternal hypertension. Fasting may affect some antenatal fetal testing indices, including nonstress tests, lower amniotic fluid levels, and lower biophysical profile scores. Current literature on the long-term effects of fasting on offspring suggests possible adverse effects, but more data are required. The quality of evidence was negatively impacted by the variation in defining "fasting during Ramadan" in pregnancy, study size and design, and potential confounders. Therefore, in counseling patients, obstetricians should be prepared to discuss the nuances in the existing data while demonstrating cultural and religious awareness and sensitivity to foster a trusting relationship between patient and provider. We provide a framework for obstetricians and other prenatal care providers to aid in that effort and supplemental materials to encourage patients to seek clinical advice on fasting. Providers should engage patients in a shared decision-making process and offer them a nuanced review of the evidence (including limitations) and individualized recommendations based on clinical experience and patient history. Finally, should certain patients choose to fast while pregnant, providers should offer medical recommendations, closer observation, and support to reduce harm and hardship while fasting.

An obstetrician-gynecologist's review of hernias: risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, and repair.

Management of obstetrical and gynecologic patients with hernias poses challenges to providers. Risks for hernia development include well-described factors that impair surgical wound healing and increase abdominal pressure. Among the diverse populations cared for by obstetricians and gynecologists, pregnant patients and those with gynecologic malignancies are at the highest risk for hernia formation. This article provides an overview of the existing literature, with a focus on patients cared for by obstetrician-gynecologists and commonly encountered preoperative and intraoperative scenarios. We highlight scenarios when a hernia repair is not commonly performed, including those of patients undergoing nonelective surgeries with known or suspected gynecologic cancers. Finally, we offer multidisciplinary recommendations on the timing of elective hernia repair with obstetrical and gynecologic procedures, with attention to the primary surgical procedure, the type of preexisting hernia, and patient characteristics.

Supply of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists to the US Medicare population: a state-by-state analysis.

BACKGROUND: The supply of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists across the United States has been described. However, these studies focused on reproductive-age patients and did not assess the growing demand for services to the advanced-age female population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the supply of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists who serve the US Medicare population per 100,000 female Medicare beneficiaries, over time and by state and region. STUDY DESIGN: The supply of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists was extracted from the Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File database of Medicare Part B claims submitted to the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Data were only available from 2012 to 2019. The supply of providers was divided by the number of original female Medicare beneficiaries obtained from the Kaiser Family Foundation; all values reported are providers per 100,000 female beneficiaries by state. Trends over time were assessed as the difference in provider-to-beneficiary ratio and the percentage change from 2012 to 2019. All data were collected in 2021. All analyses were performed with SAS, version 9.4. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval. RESULTS: In 2019, the average number of obstetrician-gynecologists per 100,000 female beneficiaries across all states was 121.32 (standard deviation±33.03). The 3 states with the highest obstetrician-gynecologist-to-beneficiary ratio were the District of Columbia (268.85), Connecticut (204.62), and Minnesota (171.60), and the 3 states with the lowest were Montana (78.37), West Virginia (82.28), and Iowa (83.92). The average number of gynecologic oncologists was 4.48 (standard deviation±2.08). The 3 states with the highest gynecologic oncologist-to-beneficiary ratio were the District of Columbia (11.30), Rhode Island (10.58), and Connecticut (9.24), and the 3 states with the lowest were Kansas (0.82), Vermont (1.41), and Mississippi (1.47). The number of obstetrician-gynecologists per 100,000 female beneficiaries decreased nationally by 8.4% from 2012 to 2019; the difference in provider-to-beneficiary ratio from 2012 to 2019 ranged from +29.97 (CT) to -82.62 (AK). Regionally, the Northeast had the smallest decrease in the number of obstetrician-gynecologists per 100,000 female beneficiaries (-3.8%) and the West had the largest (-18.2%). The number of gynecologic oncologists per 100,000 female beneficiaries increased by 7.0% nationally during the study period; this difference ranged from +8.96 (DC) to -3.39 (SD). Overall, the West had the smallest increase (4.7%) and the Midwest had the largest (15.4%). CONCLUSION: There is wide geographic variation in the supply and growth rate of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists for the female Medicare population. This analysis provides insight into areas of the country where the supply of obstetrician-gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists may not meet current and future demand. The national decrease in the number of obstetrician-gynecologists is alarming, especially because population projections estimate that the proportion of elderly female patients will grow. Future work is needed to determine why fewer providers are available to see Medicare patients and what minimum provider-to-enrollee ratios are needed for gynecologic and cancer care. Once such ratios are established, our results can help determine whether specific states and regions are meeting demand. Additional research is needed to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the supply of women's health providers.

Investigating the Underutilization of Uterine Fibroid Embolization by Surveying Practice Preferences of Obstetricians/Gynecologists.

This study aimed to survey the practice preferences of obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) that may be contributing to the underutilization of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (SUFs). A 22-question survey was created using the Qualtrics XM software and distributed to an obstetrics/gynecology-specific social media group of resident or attending OB/GYNs practicing in the United States. One hundred twelve responses met the inclusion criteria. For patients with SUFs, UFE was offered as a first-choice option <2% of the time. For patients with SUFs seeking to maintain fertility, UFE was recommended only 1% of the time after medical therapy (54%) and myomectomy (42%). Respondents reported lower rates of confidence (selecting "strongly agree" or "agree") regarding risks and benefits of UFE (77%) in comparison with those of myomectomy (99%) or hysterectomy (100%). Because UFE was seldom recommended by respondents, further, more robust polling of OB/GYNs is warranted.