Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 372(18): 1722-33, 2015 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25923552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showed a beneficial effect of 6.5 years of intensive glycemic control on retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Between 1983 and 1989, a total of 1441 patients with type 1 diabetes in the DCCT were randomly assigned to receive either intensive diabetes therapy or conventional therapy aimed at preventing hyperglycemic symptoms. They were treated and followed until 1993. Subsequently, 1375 of these patients were followed in the observational Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. The self-reported history of ocular surgical procedures was obtained annually. We evaluated the effect of intensive therapy as compared with conventional therapy on the incidence and cost of ocular surgery during these two studies. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 23 years, 130 ocular operations were performed in 63 of 711 patients assigned to intensive therapy (8.9%) and 189 ocular operations in 98 of 730 patients assigned to conventional therapy (13.4%) (P<0.001). After adjustment for DCCT baseline factors, intensive therapy was associated with a reduction in the risk of any diabetes-related ocular surgery by 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29 to 63; P<0.001) and a reduction in the risk of all such ocular procedures by 37% (95% CI, 12 to 55; P=0.01). Forty-two patients who received intensive therapy and 61 who received conventional therapy underwent cataract extraction (adjusted risk reduction with intensive therapy, 48%; 95% CI, 23 to 65; P=0.002); 29 patients who received intensive therapy and 50 who received conventional therapy underwent vitrectomy, retinal-detachment surgery, or both (adjusted risk reduction, 45%; 95% CI, 12 to 66; P=0.01). The costs of surgery were 32% lower in the intensive-therapy group. The beneficial effects of intensive therapy were fully attenuated after adjustment for mean glycated hemoglobin levels over the entire follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes was associated with a substantial reduction in the long-term risk of ocular surgery. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; DCCT/EDIC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00360893 and NCT00360815.).


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Glaucoma/cirugía , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Catarata/etiología , Extracción de Catarata , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma/etiología , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Vitrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
2.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol ; 28(2): 127-132, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27828895

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite a decrease in real average growth rates per capita since 2009, healthcare costs continue to rise worldwide. Numerous patient-related and doctor-related factors have contributed to this rise. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness and requires chronic, usually lifelong treatment. As with other chronic diseases, the adherence to prescribed treatment is often low and maybe influenced by the cost of the therapy. The purpose of this review is to seek potential solutions to best control the escalating costs of glaucoma care. RECENT FINDINGS: The studies we selected for this review can be divided into four different categories: costs of diagnostic tests; costs of direct comparisons between drugs or laser and conventional surgery; patient-related factors (such as adherence); and general aspects regarding costs: theoretical models and calculations. SUMMARY: It is challenging to find reliable studies concerning this subject matter. As patients are under the umbrellas of variously organized healthcare systems which span different cultures, the costs between countries are difficult to compare. However, one common aspect to lower costs in glaucoma care is to improve patient adherence. Theoretical models with actual patient studies could enable cost reductions by comparing multiple diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COOP/A22.


Asunto(s)
Glaucoma/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Antihipertensivos/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico/economía , Economía Farmacéutica , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Cooperación del Paciente
3.
Healthc Q ; 20(3): 69-71, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29132454

RESUMEN

Coding accuracy is an important factor in ensuring hospitals receive adequate reimbursement from the government for healthcare services rendered. A retrospective review of 100 charts, the purpose of this study was to determine the degree of coding accuracy from the surgeon perspective, for outpatient procedures performed for ophthalmic services at St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton from July to December 2016. Using ICD-10-CA, Canadian Classification of Health Interventions, Quality-Based Procedures criteria where applicable, and the 3M Coding and Reimbursement system, this paper reveals three primary sources of coding errors and presents recommendations to increase accuracy of reimbursement for the benefit of both the Ministry of Health and hospital organizations.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Control de Formularios y Registros , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/normas , Extracción de Catarata/economía , Extracción de Catarata/normas , Humanos , Ontario , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/normas , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Ophthalmology ; 123(3): 497-504, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26686965

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the cost associated with surgical versus interferon-alpha 2b (IFNα2b) treatment for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). DESIGN: A matched, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 98 patients with OSSN, 49 of whom were treated surgically and 49 of whom were treated medically. METHODS: Patients with OSSN treated with IFNα2b were matched to patients treated with surgery on the basis of age and date of treatment initiation. Financial cost to the patient was calculated using 2 different methods (hospital billing and Medicare allowable charges) and compared between the 2 groups. These fees included physician fees (clinic, pathology, anesthesia, and surgery), facility fees (clinic, pathology, and operating room), and medication costs. Time invested by patients was calculated in terms of number of visits to the hospital and compared between the 2 groups. Parking costs, transportation, caregiver wages, and lost wages were not considered in our analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of clinic visits and cost of therapy as represented by both hospital charges and Medicare allowable charges. RESULTS: When considering cost in terms of time, the medical group had an average of 2 more visits over 1 year compared with the surgical group. Cost as represented by hospital charges was higher in the surgical group (mean, $17 598; standard deviation [SD], $7624) when compared with the IFNα2b group (mean, $4986; SD, $2040). However, cost between the 2 groups was comparable when calculated on the basis of Medicare allowable charges (surgical group: mean, $3528; SD, $1610; medical group: mean, $2831; SD, $1082; P = 1.00). The highest cost in the surgical group was the excisional biopsy (hospital billing $17 598; Medicare allowable $3528), and the highest cost in the medical group was interferon ($1172 for drops, average 8.0 bottles; $370 for injections, average 5.4 injections). CONCLUSIONS: Our data in this group of patients previously demonstrated equal efficacy of surgical versus medical treatment. In this article, we consider costs of therapy and found that medical treatment involved two more office visits, whereas surgical treatment could be more or equally costly depending on insurance coverage.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/economía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/economía , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/economía , Enfermedades de la Córnea/economía , Factores Inmunológicos/economía , Interferón-alfa/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Administración Tópica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma in Situ/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/terapia , Enfermedades de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Córnea/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Córnea/terapia , Costo de Enfermedad , Neoplasias del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Ojo/economía , Neoplasias del Ojo/cirugía , Neoplasias del Ojo/terapia , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Proteínas Recombinantes/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Rev Enferm ; 38(5): 8-12, 2015 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26540890

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, economic profitability, and cost-effectiveness of the controlled ambient surgical cabin ArcSterile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study comparing the profitability of surgical procedures using the ArcSterile* with those using the operating room throughout a 12-month period by analysing the following variables: total number of treated patients, delay in surgical assistance delay and the cost per procedure. RESULTS: Throughout a 12-month period, a total number of 2011 surgical procedures were performed with the ArcSterile, and 1736 surgical procedures were performed in the conventional operating room. Minor ocular surgeries including chalazia, pterigium, intravitreal injections and others were considered, whereas cataract and vitrectomy surgeries were disregarded. The use of the ArcSterile* was associated with an increase of 14% in the number of surgeries. The cost per hour of the use of the ArcSterile* was 30.75 euro, whereas it was 142.78 euro for the coriventional operating room. CONCLUSIONS: The ArcSterile* may allow to treat more patients and to treat them earlier compared with the conventional operating room, optimizing the use of the latest for patients who need a more complex surgery. We estimated an economic impact of 134 121.39 euro savings during the 12-month period of analysis. The use of the ArcSterile* surgical cabin for outpatient ocularsurgery may represent an effective and efficient alternative to the operating room with many clinical and economic benefits.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Quirófanos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ambiente Controlado , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Ophthalmology ; 121(3): 797-801, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24268856

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the level of training and number of assistants on operative time for uncomplicated, 2-muscle, horizontal strabismus surgery at an academic institution. DESIGN: Comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 993 children and adults between the ages of 6 months and 75 years. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of strabismus surgeries performed between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012, by any of 3 attending surgeons assisted by a resident in the postgraduate year 3 (PGY3), fellow in the postgraduate year 5 (PGY5), or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time (minutes) and associated operative cost (dollars). RESULTS: There were 373 cases with 1 assistant and 44 cases with 2 assistants. Of all cases with 1 assistant, there were 200 cases with a PGY3 assistant an average operative time of 62.5 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 15.1) and 173 cases with a PGY5 assistant an average operative time of 59.0 minutes (SD, 14.7); the difference of 3.5 minutes was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The average operative time for all cases with 2 assistants (both PGY3 and PGY5) was 10.6 minutes longer than all cases with 1 assistant (P = 0.0002). No statistically significant variation in operative times was demonstrated when comparing cases with a PGY3 (P = 0.29) and PGY5 (P = 0.44) assistant in their respective first and last halves of the academic year, but operative times within individual quarters of the academic year were significant for PGY3 (P = 0.03) but not for PGY5 (P = 0.24) assistant cases. Operative times were significantly different for individual PGY3 (P = 0.03) but not PGY5 (P = 0.22) assistant cases. Cost per PGY3 assistant per year for additional operative time is $3141.95. CONCLUSIONS: Operative time in strabismus surgery increased with PGY3 participation and further increased with both assistants over either assistant alone. Operative times earlier in the year did not vary from those later in the year for PGY3 or PGY5 assistants. The difference in quarterly and individual PGY3 but not PGY5 assistant operative times suggests that efficiency in strabismus surgery varies by assistants with less experience or interest.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Internado y Residencia , Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Oftalmología/educación , Estrabismo/economía , Estrabismo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Oculomotores/cirugía , Quirófanos/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
9.
Cornea ; 40(4): 472-476, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214415

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the burden of procedures, visits, and procedure costs in the management of microbial keratitis (MK). METHODS: Medical records of patients from an academic hospital outpatient facility between December 2013 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they were older than the age of 18 years, recruited for study of likely MK, and not concurrently undergoing treatment for other acute eye conditions. For procedural costs, Medicare data for billing were obtained using the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Lookup tool. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included for analysis. Patients were on average 51.3 years (SD = 19.5), 55.9% women (n = 38), and 89.7% White (n = 61). Per person, the average number of procedures was 2.9 (SD = 4.2). The average number of visits was 13.9 (SD = 9.2) over an average of 26.9 weeks (SD = 24.3). Age (P < 0.0001), positive Gram stain (P = 0.03), and mixed Gram stain (P = 0.002) were positively associated with the number of procedures. Age (P = 0.0003), fungal keratitis (P = 0.02), and mixed Gram stain (P = 0.01) were positively associated with the number of visits. Race was inversely associated with the number of procedures (P = 0.045) and visits (0.03). Patients with bacterial keratitis were more likely to have amniotic membrane grafts (P = 0.01) and tarsorrhaphies (P = 0.03) than fungal patients. Across all procedures performed for the management of MK, the mean cost per patient was $1788.7 (SD = $3324.62). CONCLUSIONS: Patients incur many procedural costs and attend many visits during the management of MK. These findings emphasize the importance of patient-provider communication for frequent follow-up care and the potential need to perform procedures for disease management.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Córnea/cirugía , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/cirugía , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Úlcera de la Córnea/economía , Úlcera de la Córnea/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/economía , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 138(4): 382-386, 2020 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105297

RESUMEN

Importance: Alcohol-based surgical scrub is recommended for presurgical antisepsis by leading health organizations. Despite this recommendation, water-based scrub techniques remain common practice at many institutions. Objective: To calculate the potential financial savings that a large, subspecialty ophthalmic surgical center can achieve with a conversion to waterless surgical hand preparation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A review of accounting records associated with the purchase of scrubbing materials and water company invoices was conducted to assess direct costs attributable to water consumption and scrub materials for brushless, alcohol-based surgical scrub and water-based presurgical scrub. The flow rate of scrub sinks to estimate water consumption per year was tested. Savings associated with operating room (OR) and personnel time were calculated based on the prescribed scrub times for waterless techniques vs traditional running-water techniques. The study was conducted from January 5 to March 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes for this study were the quantity of water consumed by aqueous scrubbing procedures as well as the cost differences between alcohol-based surgical scrub and water-based scrub procedures per OR per year. Results: Scrub sinks consumed 15.9 L of water in a 2-minute period, projecting a savings of 61 631 L and $277 in water and sewer cost per operating room per year. Alcohol-based surgical scrub cost $1083 less than aqueous soap applied from wall-mounted soap dispensers and $271 less than preimpregnated scrub brushes per OR per year in supply costs. The decrease in scrub time from adopting waterless scrub technique could save between approximately $280 000 and $348 000 per OR per year. Conclusions and Relevance: Adopting waterless scrub techniques has the potential for economic savings attributable to water. Savings may be larger for surgical facilities performing more personnel-intensive procedures.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antisepsia/métodos , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Desinfección de las Manos/economía , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Agua , Antiinfecciosos Locales/economía , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/economía , Desinfectantes , Etanol/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Quirófanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Cuidados Preoperatorios
11.
Retina ; 29(8): 1106-10, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19491723

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the anatomical success and visual outcome in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and coexisting macular holes using two different management strategies. METHODS: Nonrandomized, prospective interventional case series where patients either had combined surgery, i.e., vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peel, retinopexy to the peripheral breaks, and gas tamponade; or sequential, i.e., vitrectomy, retinopexy to the peripheral breaks, and gas tamponade with macular hole surgery if indicated, as a secondary procedure. RESULTS: Five patients (Group 1) had combined surgery and 7 (Group 2) had sequential treatment. All retinas were reattached irrespective of surgical approach. In Group 1, best-corrected visual acuity improved in all patients from 1.8/60 to 9.2/60 Snellen (P = 0.06). In Group 2, there was improvement in best-corrected visual acuity in all patients from 3.3/60 to 12.9/60 Snellen (P = 0.05). After comparison of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity improvement was not significantly different between both groups (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that good anatomic and visual outcome can be achieved using either approach. Visual acuity improved in all patients from both groups. In sequential surgery some of the macular holes may close spontaneously. However, combined surgery offers the clinical and cost benefit of a single procedure.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Perforaciones de la Retina/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Retina/cirugía , Desprendimiento de Retina/complicaciones , Perforaciones de la Retina/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual
14.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser ; 19(9): 1-57, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31942228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a condition that causes progressive damage to the optic nerve, which can lead to visual impairment and irreversible blindness. There is a spectrum of current treatments for glaucoma that aim to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), including pharmacotherapy (eye drops), laser therapy, and the more invasive option of filtration surgery. A new class of treatments called minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) may reduce IOP and offer a better safety profile than more invasive procedures. We conducted a budget impact analysis of MIGS for adults with glaucoma from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. We also conducted interviews with people with glaucoma and family members of people with glaucoma to determine patient preferences and values surrounding glaucoma and its treatment options, including MIGS. We completed this work to complement a health technology assessment conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). METHODS: We analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding MIGS in adults with glaucoma in Ontario. We derived costs from the collaborative health technology assessment.1 We assumed MIGS may be used in three subgroups: (1) MIGS in combination with cataract surgery as a replacement for cataract surgery alone in people with mild to moderate glaucoma; (2) MIGS alone as a replacement for other glaucoma treatments in people with mild to moderate glaucoma; and (3) MIGS (alone or in combination with cataract surgery) to replace filtration surgery (alone or in combination with cataract surgery) in people with advanced to severe glaucoma. We estimated the budget impact over 5 years for two possible uptake scenarios: a slow rate of uptake and a fast rate of uptake. To contextualize the lived experience of glaucoma and treatments for glaucoma, we also interviewed people with glaucoma and family members of people with glaucoma, some of whom had experience with surgical procedures such as MIGS and some of whom did not. RESULTS: Assuming a slow uptake scenario, the annual budget impact of publicly funding MIGS in Ontario over the next 5 years ranges from $1 million in year 1 to $18 million in year 5. Assuming a fast uptake scenario, the annual budget impact of publicly funding MIGS in Ontario over the next 5 years ranges from $6 million in year 1 to $70 million in year 5. The budget impact varies depending on the proportion of people in each of the three subgroups described above. Introducing a new MIGS billing code may reduce the overall expenditures. Interview participants felt that less invasive surgical procedures, such as MIGS, could control glaucoma progression with minimal side effects and recovery time needed. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that publicly funding MIGS in Ontario would result in additional costs over the next 5 years; however, this may depend on the populations using MIGS and if uptake is restricted or controlled. For the people with glaucoma we spoke with, avoiding blindness was their paramount concern, and MIGS was perceived as an effective treatment option with minimal side effects and recovery time required.


Asunto(s)
Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Glaucoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Prioridad del Paciente , Presupuestos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cirugía Filtrante/economía , Glaucoma/economía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Calidad de Vida
15.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 97(8): 771-777, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968572

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of two operation methods for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 104 patients were randomly assigned to IOL repositioning by scleral suturing (n = 54) or IOL exchange with a retropupillary iris-claw lens (n = 50). A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed in conjunction with previously published 6-month efficacy and safety results. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as the cost difference between the operation groups relative to their difference in postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (mean and 95% confidence interval: minimum and maximum), reported as the cost difference in United States Dollars ($) per logMAR difference. RESULTS: Exchange surgery was $281.20 ± 17.66 more expensive than repositioning, mainly explained by the new IOL and the frequent use of anterior vitrectomy. A previous trial publication revealed no significant difference in the 6-month postoperative CDVA between the groups. In the CEA, the mean group difference yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -$281.20 per -0.11 logMAR (-$1108/QALY) in favour of repositioning, ranging from -$281.20 per -0.29 logMAR (-$406/QALY) in favour of repositioning to +$281.20 per -0.08 logMAR (+$1522/QALY) in favour of exchange. The CEA did not include the mean 9.5 min shorter operation time for exchange. CONCLUSION: Repositioning tended to be more cost-effective than exchange; however, this is modified if also considering the operation time. Overall, it seems the cost-effectiveness is not alone sufficiently different to recommend one of the operation methods over the other for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation.


Asunto(s)
Migracion de Implante de Lente Artificial/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cápsula del Cristalino/cirugía , Lentes Intraoculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Técnicas de Sutura/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Migracion de Implante de Lente Artificial/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Reoperación/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Eye (Lond) ; 33(3): 478-485, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30356129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the hospital burden and health economic impact of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) national data was extracted between 1st January 2002 and 31st December 2016. All those within England with a diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension were included. Those with secondary causes of raised intracranial pressure such as tumours, hydrocephalus and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 23,182 new IIH cases were diagnosed. Fifty-two percent resided in the most socially deprived areas (quintiles 1 and 2). Incidence rose between 2002 and 2016 from 2.3 to 4.7 per 100,000 in the general population. Peak incidence occurred in females aged 25 (15.2 per 100,000). 91.6% were treated medically, 7.6% had a cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure, 0.7% underwent bariatric surgery and 0.1% had optic nerve sheath fenestration. Elective caesarean sections rates were significantly higher in IIH (16%) compared to the general population (9%), p < 0.005. Admission rates rose by 442% between 2002 and 2014, with 38% having repeated admissions in the year following diagnosis. Duration of hospital admission was 2.7 days (8.8 days for those having CSF diversion procedures). Costs rose from £9.2 to £50 million per annum over the study period with costs forecasts of £462 million per annum by 2030. CONCLUSIONS: IIH incidence is rising (by greater than 100% over the study), highest in areas of social deprivation and mirroring obesity trends. Re-admissions rates are high and growing yearly. The escalating population and financial burden of IIH has wide reaching implications for the health care system.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/estadística & datos numéricos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Presión Intracraneal/fisiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Nervio Óptico/patología , Seudotumor Cerebral/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/economía , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/economía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/economía , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Seudotumor Cerebral/economía , Seudotumor Cerebral/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
19.
Int J Evid Based Healthc ; 16(3): 167-173, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30074566

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the new system of pricing medical services in the field of ophthalmology in Greece. In addition, it attempts to benchmark the system with respective interventions at an international level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study deals with the implementation of the new system, presenting systematic pairing of ophthalmic coding with other coded information regarding registration and management. Statistical data analysis is performed related to the cost and, finally, proposals are formulated to improve the current system. RESULTS: A significant difference is noted in the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the Greek system compared with internationally applied Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) systems in the field of ophthalmology. The proposed funding for ophthalmic inpatient cases mostly meets real needs and costs of hospitals for supplies. Complicated cases, mainly in cataract surgery, increase the real cost and may cause a deviation depending on the rate of complications. In these cases, the average cost was 673.28 ±â€Š58.7&OV0556; as opposed to uncomplicated cases (346.78 ±â€Š21.3&OV0556;), bearing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). The total compensation of the hospital was higher than the actual cost for surgical procedures covering the respective expenses. CONCLUSION: Although the recently implemented compensation system for public hospitals mostly covers the actual cost for ophthalmic surgical cases, some deviations from the real needs are being identified. Several amendments could be applied to increase efficiency and improve the quality of health services provided by Greek hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital/organización & administración , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Grecia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/economía
20.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 66(8): 1149-1153, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30038162

RESUMEN

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the associations of strabismus surgery reoperation rates in a large national database of provider payments with geographic region, practice type and volume, and the availability of adjustable suture technique. Methods: Fee-for-service payments to providers for medicare beneficiaries having strabismus surgery between 2012 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed to identify reoperations in the same calendar year. The adjustable-suture technique was considered to be available to the patient if the patient's surgeon billed for adjustable sutures. Predictors of reoperation in the same calendar year were determined by multivariable logistic regression. Results: Availability of the adjustable suture technique was not associated with reoperation rate in multivariable analysis among 5971 patients having horizontal muscle surgery (odds ratio, [OR] 0.86, P = 0.29), 2840 patients having vertical muscle surgery (OR 0.98, P = 0.93), or 1199 patients having surgery with scarring or restriction (OR 0.86, P = 0.61). For horizontal surgery, the reoperation rate was higher in academic practices (OR 1.67), as compared with community practices, and in the South (OR 2.85) and West (OR 1.92, all P < 0.001). The reoperation rate was unchanged with surgeons in the lowest-quartile of surgical volume. Among surgeons paid for horizontal surgery, 45% of surgeons in the Northeast, the West, or Florida coded for adjustable sutures, compared with 8% of surgeons elsewhere (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The availability of the adjustable-suture technique was not associated with reoperation rate after strabismus surgery in this large national database. Having surgery by a lower-volume surgeon was not associated with a higher reoperation rate. The reoperation rate was higher when surgery was conducted in an academic practice, or in certain regions of the country. Adjustable sutures are largely a bicoastal practice.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Medicare/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/economía , Estrabismo/cirugía , Cirujanos/provisión & distribución , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Suturas/economía , Anciano , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Oculomotores/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estrabismo/economía , Técnicas de Sutura/economía , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA