Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 30(12): 2013-2022, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377841

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients' views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0-29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The 'informed' subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the 'uncertainty' subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing 'safety' issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker 'recovery'. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing 'efficacy' as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION: SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 29(2): 285-290, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28580496

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited evidence guides operative technique in primary midurethral sling (MUS) lysis or excision at the time of repeat sling placement for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Our objective is to compare subjective improvement in patients undergoing repeat MUS placement with and without concurrent primary sling lysis or removal. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with a prospective survey of patients who underwent two MUS placements for SUI at a single institution from January 1996 to December 2015. After patient identification, the electronic record was queried for demographic and perioperative data. Subjects then completed the Urogenital Distress Index, (UDI-6), Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Subjects were also asked if they would choose to undergo repeat MUS surgery again. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. 17 out of 61 (28%) underwent concomitant primary sling lysis or excision, and 44 out of 61 (72%) did not. Fifty-seven percent (n = 35) completed the survey. Of the respondents, the median ISI score was 4 (1-8), with no difference between groups; 14 out of 35 (40%) reported the presence of bothersome urge incontinence, 11 out of 35 (31%) reported bothersome stress urinary incontinence, and 8 out of 35 (23%) reported symptoms of voiding dysfunction, with no difference between groups. 57% of patients (20 out of 35) would undergo repeat MUS placement again. CONCLUSIONS: In a small cohort, concurrent excision of the primary sling at the time of repeat MUS did not improve subjective outcomes. Many patients reported urinary urgency and voiding symptoms, and only about half of patients would choose to undergo the surgery again if given the choice.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Reoperación/psicología , Cabestrillo Suburetral , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
3.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 36(4): 1187-1193, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27564322

RESUMEN

AIMS: To quantify to what extent patients are willing to trade their chance of cure of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) against less postoperative groin pain. Randomized, controlled trials show less postoperative pain following single-incision mini-sling (SIMS), but slightly higher cure rates following a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS). METHODS: A multi-center, interview-based trade-off experiment for treatment preference among 100 women with predominant SUI and undergoing SIMS. A hypothetical cure rate of SIMS was systematically varied from 10% to 70%, while keeping the cure rate of SMUS constant at 70%. The trade-off was assessed for two hypothetical durations of substantial postoperative pain after SMUS-2 days or 2 weeks-while simultaneously assuming the absence of substantial postoperative pain after SIMS. RESULTS: To prevent 2 days of substantial postoperative pain with SMUS, patients were willing to accept a 4.3% mean decrease in cure rate of SIMS, while a 7.1% mean decrease was acceptable to forego 2 weeks of substantial pain. Younger women (P = 0.04) and single women (P = 0.04) were associated with the trade-off limit for 2 days, respectively, 2 weeks of substantial postoperative pain. Single women were willing to accept lower cure rates. No correlations with trade-off limits were found for patients' actual severity, duration, and frequency of SUI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to accept a slightly lower probability of cure to prevent substantial post-operative pain by undergoing a less invasive procedure. These results are relevant for counselling of patients indicated for SUI surgery.


Asunto(s)
Dolor/cirugía , Prioridad del Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/psicología , Cabestrillo Suburetral , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , Femenino , Ingle , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/psicología , Dolor/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Cabestrillo Suburetral/psicología , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/complicaciones , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología
4.
J Sex Med ; 13(10): 1498-507, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27641921

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence has a negative impact on sexual function. AIM: To assess the effect of midurethral sling surgery on sexual activity and function in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Value of Urodynamics Prior to Stress Incontinence Surgery (VUSIS-II) study, which assessed the value of urodynamics in women with (predominantly) stress urinary incontinence. Patients who underwent retropubic or transobturator sling surgery were included in the present study if information was available on sexual activity before and 12 months after surgery. Data were collected from a self-report validated questionnaire combined with non-validated questions. The association between midurethral sling surgery and sexual function (coital incontinence, satisfaction, and dyspareunia) was compared with McNemar χ(2) tests for nominal data and paired t-tests for ordinal data. Potentially influential factors were analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in sexual activity and sexual function after midurethral sling surgery. RESULTS: Information on sexual activity was available in 293 of the 578 women (51%) included in the VUSIS-II study. At baseline, 252 of 293 patients (86%) were sexually active vs 244 of 293 (83%) after 12 months. More patients with cured stress urinary incontinence were sexually active postoperatively (213 of 247 [86%] vs 31 of 46 [67%], P < .01). There was a significant decrease in coital incontinence (120 of 236 [51%] preoperatively vs 16 of 236 [7%] postoperatively, P < .01). De novo dyspareunia was present in 21 of 238 women (9%). There was a greater improvement in coital incontinence after placement of the retropubic sling compared with the transobturator sling (odds ratio = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.10-3.80, P = .02). CONCLUSION: These data show that midurethral sling surgery has an overall positive influence on sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. The retropubic sling is more effective than the transobturator sling for improvement of coital incontinence. De novo dyspareunia was present in 1 of 11 women.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Sexual/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Cabestrillo Suburetral/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Dispareunia/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/psicología , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Cabestrillo Suburetral/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugía , Urodinámica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología
5.
Schmerz ; 30(2): 166-73, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26242358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is not systematically assessed during premedication appointments, although it may influence the postoperative course and outcome. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess preoperative anxiety in a sample of patients before major urological surgery and to characterize the impact on postoperative pain. An additional aim was to analyze the agreement between patients' self-ratings and physicians' anxiety ratings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 127 male and 27 female patients participated in a prospective observational study. Preoperative anxiety was assessed with two validated instruments - the APAIS (Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale) and the State Scale of the STOA questionnaire (State-Trait Operation Anxiety) - during the premedication appointment. Physicians provided their subjective ratings on patients' anxiety and need for information using the APAIS. The predictive value of preoperative anxiety for postoperative pain was evaluated. RESULTS: Nearly four out of ten patients were identified as "anxiety cases"; thereof women were more afraid than men were. Preoperative anxiety was not correctly assessed by physicians, who overestimated patients' anxiety. In female patients, preoperative anxiety was predictive of increased postoperative pain scores. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anxiety is a frequent concern and often not correctly assessed by physicians. The use of scoring systems to detect preoperative anxiety is useful in clinical routine and helps to decide on therapeutic interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/complicaciones , Ansiedad/psicología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estadística como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Int Braz J Urol ; 41(3): 562-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26200552

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Literature pertaining to surgical disclosure to the pediatric patient is lacking. We hypothesized parents would find it difficult to disclose urologic surgery to a child. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents of patients <5 years old undergoing urologic surgery were contacted for telephone survey. Parents were asked about future plans of surgical disclosure, comfort with disclosure, and any support received. RESULTS: 98 parents consented to study participation. 87% of surgeries were on the genitalia with 62% being minor genitalia surgery (i.e. circumcision). 70% of parents would tell their child about minor genital surgery while 84% would tell about major genital surgery (p=0.07). 4 of 20 parents of children undergoing hypospadias repair (major genital surgery) did not plan to tell their child about surgery. All parents of children undergoing non-genital surgery would tell. Of all parents planning to tell their children about surgery, only 14% were nervous. 34% of parents would find guidance in talking to their child helpful despite the majority (90%) stating no guidance had ever been provided. CONCLUSIONS: Parents seem comfortable discussing urologic surgeries with a child but about 1/3 would appreciate further counseling. 20% of parents of children undergoing hypospadias repair hope to avoid telling their child.


Asunto(s)
Revelación/estadística & datos numéricos , Genitales/cirugía , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; 60(3): 48-51, 2015.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26415297

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of µl-opioid receptor (OPRM1) 118A>G and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) 1947G>A gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) combinations on postoperative opioid analgesia (POA) efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 100 consecutive patients scheduled for major urologic surgeries the SNPs of OPRM1 118A>G and COMT 1947G>A (real-time PCR), preoperative anxiety and depression level (HADS scale), POA efficacy ("Pain Out" questionnaire) have been assessed. RESULTS: Preoperative anxiety and depression, additional analgesia requirements, severity of nausea, drowsiness and incidence of vomiting were higher in OPRM1 118G allele carriers. Maximum pain intensity and pain-related restriction of mobility on first postoperative day were lower in homozygous carriers of COMT 1947A. The best response to POA in view of preoperative anxiety, analgesia efficacy and severity of nausea has been revealed in carriers of combination COMT-OPRM1 AA-AA. CONCLUSIONS: SNPs of OPRM1 118A>G and COMT 1947G>A affect the preoperative patients psychological status and POA efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/genética , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Receptores Opioides mu/genética , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/genética , Dolor Postoperatorio/metabolismo , Periodo Perioperatorio , Estrés Psicológico/genética , Estrés Psicológico/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología
8.
J Urol ; 191(5 Suppl): 1558-63, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24679868

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hypospadias repair is a commonly performed procedure. Little is known about decisional regret in parents who agree to proceed with this surgical reconstruction. We present data on this previously underexplored issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed followup analysis of 100 couples prospectively evaluated after counseling for surgical correction of distal hypospadias in their son with assessment of complications and decisional regret 1 year after surgery. Findings were contrasted with baseline demographics, hypospadias knowledge and decisional conflict at the time of counseling. RESULTS: Decisional regret was found in 116 parents, including mild regret in 41.4% and moderate to severe regret in 8.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in paired regret analysis between mothers and fathers. Complications were strongly associated with decisional regret (p <0.001). On regression analysis postoperative complications (OR 14.7, 95% CI 1.6-131.6), parental desire to avoid circumcision (OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.1-49.4) and initial decisional conflict level (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) were statistically significant predictors of moderate to strong decisional regret. These findings remained robust after imputation strategies to address missing data. The impact of decisional conflict and preference for circumcision were significant even after excluding families who experienced complications. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating parental decisional regret after providing consent for surgical correction of distal hypospadias in their son. Based on the described risk factors efforts aimed at minimizing complications and counseling about foreskin preservation techniques may be prudent to ameliorate decisional regret. The novel association between decisional conflict and regret suggests that conflict assessment during counseling may help screen families at risk for postoperative regret.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Emociones , Hipospadias/cirugía , Padres/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adulto , Circuncisión Masculina , Humanos , Hipospadias/psicología , Lactante , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(5): 605-611, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urological surgery presents unique challenges to patients, necessitating specialised aftercare nursing. Evidence-based nursing has emerged as a strategy to improve patient outcomes through tailored education, self-management strategies and psychological support. However, its specific impact on post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing urological surgery has not been extensively explored. METHODS: This study assessed postoperative self-efficacy, quality of life, treatment compliance and nursing satisfaction. Self-compiled percentage of satisfaction scale was used to assess the degree of satisfaction with nursing work in both groups. Patients' self-care ability was evaluated using the Self-Care Ability Scale, and their quality of life scores were assessed with Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). Patients' anxiety and depression levels were examined using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 29.0 statistical software. RESULTS: This retrospective study analysed 231 patients undergoing urological surgery and categorised them into a usual care group (n = 99) and an evidence-based nursing group (n = 132). Post-operative outcomes in the evidence-based nursing group included significantly higher self-care abilities (p < 0.001), improved quality of life scores (p < 0.001), lower anxiety and depression levels (p < 0.001) and higher treatment compliance rates (p < 0.05) compared with the usual care group. Additionally, nursing satisfaction was higher in the evidence-based nursing group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide compelling evidence regarding the favourable impact of evidence-based nursing on various post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing urological surgery. Evidence-based nursing shows promise in enhancing patients' self-efficacy, well-being, treatment compliance and satisfaction. The results underscore the potential benefits of evidence-based nursing in optimising aftercare nursing and driving positive patient-centred outcomes in urological surgery setting.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia , Cooperación del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Autoeficacia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto
10.
J Pediatr Urol ; 20(4): 742.e1-742.e9, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548553

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Parents are at risk of decision regret (DR) for decisions affecting their children. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) measures medical DR but lacks context outside of healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To compare parental DR 1) between common pediatric urologic surgeries and everyday decisions and 2) with preference to make a different choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of randomly selected parents >1year (y) after their children underwent: orchiopexy (males ≤10y), open ureteral reimplant (OUR, females 2-6y), open pyeloplasty (OP, ≤2y), or robotic pyeloplasty (RP, 5-17y) (2017-2021). Higher DRS scores indicate increased DR (none: 0, mild: 1-25, moderate: 30-50, strong: 55-75, very strong: 80-100). Parents completed DRS on four decisions: their child's surgery, most recent/current romantic relationship, most recent leased/purchased car, and most recent purchased meal. Parents reported if they would make the same choice (yes/no). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: We surveyed 191 parents (orchiopexy n = 52, OUR n = 50, OP n = 51, RP n = 38). The median parent age was 36y (mothers: 86%). Some DR was reported for all decisions, but with significant differences in DR severity. The lowest median DRS score was seen with surgery (orchiopexy 0 [IQR 0-10], OUR 0 [IQR 0-5], OP 0 [IQR 0-0], RP 0 [IQR 0-0]), with no difference between surgery groups (p = 0.78). This was followed by relationship (0, IQR 0-20), car (15, IQR 0-25), and meal (20, IQR 0-30, p < 0.001). Most parents did not report any DR regarding surgery (orchiopexy 69%, OUR 74%, OP 76%, RP 76%, with no difference between surgery groups p = 0.85, Summary Figure). Comparatively, 59% of parents did not have any regret about their relationship, 37% their car, and 28% their meal (p < 0.001). All surgical DR was mild or moderate. No parent (0%) would have chosen differently for their child's surgery versus 4-12% for non-surgical decisions (p < 0.001). Overall, increasing DR corresponded to increasing desire to have made a different choice (DRS≤10: 0%, DRS 45-50: 32%, DRS 55-60: 66%, DRS≥75: 100%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Parental DR varied between urological surgical and non-surgical decisions. It was lowest after surgery. Some regret was reported after every decision, but the subset of parents with regret was smallest after surgical decisions. Positive DRS scores do not necessarily correspond to parents wishing they made a different choice.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Emociones , Padres , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Padres/psicología , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Preescolar , Adolescente , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 67(3): 491-6, 589-93, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24340567

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies on quality of life of patients with stoma in Poland included small groups of respondents and were based either on the non-validated questionnaires created ad hoc, or on the disease-specific oncologic questionnaires. OBJECTIVES: To assess quality of life of Polish patients with a stoma using validated generic questionnaire. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients with colostomy, ileostomy or urostomy performed in Poland between July 2009 and March 2010 were included. Patients completed satisfaction survey at the discharge from the hospital, and The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) generic questionnaire at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The study involved 737 patients (71%, 18%, 11% with colostomy, ileostomy and urostomy, respectively). The studied population was highly diversified in terms of: dependence on medical treatment, pain and discomfort, satisfaction with health and acceptance of physical appearance. 59% of patients with a stoma defined their quality of life as very good or good (mean 3.56 points; range: 1 to 5; SD 0.74). The subjects were characterized by low quality of life assessment in the physical health and psychological domains (52.9 and 60.1 pts.) and by high evaluation in the environment and social relationships domains (69.7 and 70.1 pts.). Respondents highly assessed: the level of social support, home environment, physical environment, personal relationships. Low assessment was related to: sexual activity, ability to work, dependence on medical treatment, financial resources, satisfaction with health. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life in patients with a stoma, assessed at three months after the surgery, is higher when compared to typical patients hospitalized in the internal medicine ward. Identified quality of life limitations relate in particular to sexual life.


Asunto(s)
Colostomía/psicología , Ileostomía/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Organización Mundial de la Salud
12.
Duodecim ; 128(9): 981-2, 2012.
Artículo en Fi | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22667052

RESUMEN

A 15-year old boy dropped out of school, withdrew into his home and, on inquiry upon the matter, threatened with suicide. Upon disentangling the issue it turned out that the boy perceived his urinary tract disease and associated pediatric surgery procedures so shameful and distressing that they had eventually exceeded his psychic ability. The mental state of the boy improved with therapeutic discussions and adolescent psychiatric rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Abandono Escolar/psicología , Ideación Suicida , Enfermedades Urológicas/psicología , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino
14.
Surg Endosc ; 25(2): 437-43, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20734086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Professionals working in the operating room (OR) are subject to various distractions that can be detrimental to their task performance and the quality of their work. This study aimed to quantify the frequency, nature, and effect on performance of (potentially) distracting events occurring during endourological procedures and additionally explored urologists' and residents' perspectives on experienced ill effects due to distracting factors. METHODS: First, observational data were collected prospectively during endourological procedures in one OR of a teaching hospital. A seven-point ordinal scale was used to measure the level of observed interference with the main task of the surgical team. Second, semistructured interviews were conducted with eight urologists and seven urology residents in two hospitals to obtain their perspectives on the impact of distracting factors. RESULTS: Seventy-eight procedures were observed. A median of 20 distracting events occurred per procedure, which corresponds to an overall rate of one distracting event every 1.8 min. Equipment problems and procedure-related and medically irrelevant communication were the most frequently observed causes of interruptions and identified as the most distracting factors in the interviews. Occurrence of distracting factors in difficult situations requiring high levels of concentration was perceived by all interviewees as disturbing and negatively impacting performance. The majority of interviewees (13/15) thought distracting factors impacted more strongly on residents' compared to urologists' performance due to their different levels of experience. CONCLUSION: Distracting events occur frequently in the OR. Equipment problems and communication, the latter both procedure-related and medically irrelevant, have the largest impact on the sterile team and regularly interrupt procedures. Distracting stimuli can influence performance negatively and should therefore be minimized. Further research is required to determine the direct effect of distraction on patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Endoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía/psicología , Quirófanos/métodos , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Cistoscopía/efectos adversos , Cistoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/efectos adversos , Histeroscopía/métodos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/educación
15.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(5): 281-288, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205557

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if a perineorrhaphy at the time of apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery positively affects women's body image. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial of women undergoing apical suspension procedures in which women (GH ≥2 cm to ≤6 cm) received either perineorrhaphy or no perineorrhaphy. The primary aim compared body image between the groups postoperatively using the Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (BIPOP) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included prolapse stage, pain, pelvic floor muscle strength, pelvic floor symptoms, and sexual function. Between- and within-group differences were compared using Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. When continuous variables were not normally distributed, the Welch-Satterthwaite test was used. Within-group analyses were performed via paired t tests for select continuous variables. RESULTS: Forty-six women were enrolled; 45 (97.8%) completed the 6-week assessment and 38 (82.6%) completed the 3-month assessment. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Although women within groups had an expected improvement in mean Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse and subscale scores between baseline and 3 months (P < 0.05), there were no differences in the mean scores between groups. In addition, there were no differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of apical prolapse surgery improved women's body image, irrespective of performance of a perineorrhaphy. Other important outcomes, including pain, did not differ between women in the 2 groups. These findings demonstrate the need for further trials to investigate the utility of this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Perineo/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología
16.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 19(2): e63-e68, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863188

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the health-related quality of life of uro-oncologic patients whose surgery was postponed without being rescheduled during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the March 1 to April 26, 2020, major urologic surgeries were drastically reduced at our tertiary-care referral hospital. In order to evaluate health-related quality-of-life outcomes, the SF-36 questionnaire was sent to all patients scheduled for major surgery at our department 3 weeks after the cancellation of the planned surgical procedures because of the COVID-19 emergency. RESULTS: All patients included in the analysis had been awaiting surgery for a median (interquartile range) time of 52.85 (35-72) days. The SF-36 questionnaire measured 8 domains: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health (PH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/fatigue (EF), emotional well-being (EWB), social functioning (SF), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GHP). When considering physical characteristics as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, PF was 91.5 (50-100) and PH was 82.75 (50-100) with a BP of 79.56 (45-90). For emotional and social aspects, RE was 36.83 (0-100) with a SF of 37.98 (12.5-90). Most patients reported loss of energy (EF 35.28 [15-55]) and increased anxiety (EWB 47.18 [interquartile range, 20-75]). All patients perceived a reduction of their health conditions, with GHP of 49.47 (15-85). Generally, 86% of patients (n = 43) noted an almost intact physical function but a significant emotional alteration characterized by a prevalence of anxiety and loss of energy. CONCLUSION: The lockdown due to the novel coronavirus that has affected most operating rooms in Italy could be responsible for the increased anxiety and decrement in health status of oncologic patients. Without any effective solution, we should expect a new medical catastrophe-one caused by the increased risk of tumor progression and mortality in uro-oncologic patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Urológicas/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/virología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos/normas , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Curr Opin Urol ; 20(6): 495-9, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20625297

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now recognised as the most appropriate instruments to assess the effectiveness of healthcare interventions from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this review was to identify recent publications describing the use of PROMs following reconstructive urological surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: A wide systematic search identified only three original articles published in the last 2 years that prospectively assessed effectiveness using a patient-completed condition-specific or generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument. These publications illustrate the need to administer PROMs at a postoperative interval relevant to the anticipated recovery phase of individual procedures. They also highlight the difference in responsiveness of generic HRQoL instruments to symptomatic improvement between straightforward conditions such as pelviureteric junction obstruction and complex multidimensional conditions such as meningomyelocele. SUMMARY: PROMs uptake and awareness is increasing in reconstructive urology but more work is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of surgical procedures for patients and healthcare funders alike. Healthcare policy-makers now rely on these measures to determine whether specific treatments are worth financing and to compare outcomes between institutions.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/economía
18.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 8: 103, 2010 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20846435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The validity of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) recalled by ICU admitted patients have not been published. The aim of this study was to compare the baseline HRQOL measured before surgery and ICU admission with that recalled at 3 and 6 months in a population of patients with planned ICU admission after surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was performed in three Italian centres on patients who had undergone General, Orthopaedic or Urologic surgery. All adult patients with planned ICU admission between October 2007 and July 2008 were considered for enrolment. At hospital admission, the Mini Mental Status Examination and EuroQoL (EQ) questionnaire (referring to the last two weeks) were administered to the patients who consented. Three and six months after ICU admission, the researchers administered by phone the EQ questionnaire and Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome 14 questions Inventory, asking the patients to rate their HRQOL before surgery and ICU admission. Past medical history demographic and clinical ICU-related variables were collected. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test and non parametric statistics were used to compare groups of patients. The EQ-5D was transformed in the time trade-off (TTO) to obtain a continuous variable, subsequently analysed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Of the 104 patients assessed at baseline and discharged from the hospital, 93 had the EQ administered at 3 months, and 89 at 6 months. The ICC for TTO recalled at 3 months vs pre-ICU TTO was 0.851, and that for TTO recalled at 6 months vs pre-ICU TTO was 0.833. The ICC for the EQ-VAS recalled at 3 months vs pre-ICU EQ-VAS was 0.648, and that for the EQ-VAS recalled at 6 months vs pre-ICU EQ-VAS was 0.580. Forty-two (45%) patients assessed at 3 months gave the same score in all EQ-5D items as at baseline. They underwent mainly orthopaedic surgery (p 0.011), and perceived the severity of their illness as lower (p 0.009) than patients scoring differently at 3 months in comparison with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with planned ICU admission have a good memory of their health status as measured by EQ-5D in the period preceding surgery and ICU admission, especially at three months.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Recuerdo Mental , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 72(4): 408-419, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734749

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD) are two steps of the same surgical procedure involving likely complications and important impact on quality of life (QoL). The literature was reviewed to identify recent studies reporting UDs complications occurred 90 days after surgery and graded by Clavien-Dindo Classification System (CCS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive systematic Medline search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Scopus databases to identify reports published in English starting from 2013 using key words related to review outcome (i.e. neobladder, ileal conduct, ureterocutaneostomy, cystectomy, QoL). Complications were defined as minor or major whether the CCS grade was ≤2 or ≥3, respectively. Then, manuscripts references were screened to identify unfounded studies. Only studies using CCS to report surgical complications were considered. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Retrieved studies were reported according to two main items of complications and QoL. About UDs complications, fourteen studies were identified incorporating overall 4436 patients. Up to 50% of patients experienced at least one low-grade complications (CCS≤2) requiring pharmacological treatment to be healed. On the other hand, high-grade complications (CCS≥3) occurred in 0.7-42% of cases and required surgical interventions (CCS 3a and 3b) or life support (CCS=4). Finally, mortality (CCS=5) rated between 0.4-7%. Regarding QoL, six studies were analyzed with overall 445 patients. Most of them were retrospective and showed conflicting results whether the external UDs were better than neobladder in term of impact on QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a standardized system such as CCS improves analyses of literature. However, rigorous patient selection for UD type makes unable a randomized comparison between UDs in terms of complications and QoL impact.


Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Íleon/cirugía , Uréter/cirugía , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/psicología , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA