Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(1): 83-88, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33583317

RESUMEN

Hyperglycaemia can alter placental resistance to blood flow and hyperglycaemia has adverse perinatal outcomes. Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) increases the maternal plasma glucose levels temporarily and mimics metabolic hyperglycaemia. The blood flow of the uterine artery (UtA), umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) were assessed before, 1 and 2 h following the OGTT by using Doppler ultrasonography. Z-score of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), pulsatility index (PI) for three vessels were evaluated separately. All measurements of the MCA, UA, UtA Doppler parameters were not statistically different for fasting, and 1 and 2 h following the 75 g OGTT in the 53 pregnant women with a singleton gestation in the low-risk group. This study results show that acute hyperglycaemia induced by OGTT has no effect on maternal and foetal Doppler parameters in healthy pregnancies.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Foetal glucose is affected by maternal blood glucose concentrations and placental blood flow. Acute hyperglycaemia may have an effect on maternal, and foetal Doppler parameters among healthy pregnanciesWhat do the results of this study add? Our findings indicate that blood flow velocity metric measurements in the UA, MCA and UtA were not affected by the OGTT in healthy pregnant women.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Acute hyperglycaemia induced by OGTT does not have any effect on fetomaternal circulation, especially foetal brain blood flow. Other foetal vessels including ductus venosus, renal artery, etc. may be affected by maternal blood glucose levels during the OGTT or in diabetic patients. Future prospective studies consisting of diabetic patients are warranted to verify the exact effect of glucose levels on foetal and maternal circulation.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/fisiopatología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Adulto , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Cerebral Media/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Cerebral Media/efectos de los fármacos , Arteria Cerebral Media/embriología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Flujo Pulsátil , Ultrasonografía Doppler/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Umbilicales/efectos de los fármacos , Arterias Umbilicales/embriología , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Uterina/efectos de los fármacos , Arteria Uterina/embriología , Adulto Joven
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 49(6): 1742-1747, 2019 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31655528

RESUMEN

Background/aim: The possibility of adverse effects of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) carried out for the screening of gestational diabetes among pregnant women and fetuses is a frequently discussed topic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the hyperglycemia peak during OGTT on the levels of oxidants and antioxidants in the body. Materials and methods: Eighty individuals who applied to the Outpatient Clinic with suspected diabetes and OGTT indication were included in the study. Glucose, total oxidant capacity status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAS), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH) levels were tested on blood samples collected from these individuals at 0, 60, and 120 min during the OGTT carried out with 75 g of glucose. Oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated as the ratio of TOS to TAS. Results: While the oxidative parameters TOS and LOOH were significantly increased at 60. min of OGTT, only LOOH was significantly increased at 120. min of OGTT. Significant decreases in antioxidative parameters (TAS, SOD) were observed at 60. and 120. min of the OGTT and OSI was significantly increased at 60. and 120. min of the OGTT. Conclusion: Oxidative stress parameters were increased and antioxidative parameters were decreased during the OGTT. However, more extended studies are required to determine the effects of the increased oxidative stress on pregnant women and fetuses.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antioxidantes/análisis , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Peróxidos Lipídicos/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxidantes/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Superóxido Dismutasa/sangre , Adulto Joven
3.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 20(2): 352-361, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28776922

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and tolerability of subcutaneous (s.c.). exendin 9-39 (Ex-9) injection in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH). METHODS: Nine women who had recurrent symptomatic hypoglycaemia after undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were enrolled in this 2-part, single-blind, single-ascending-dose study. In Part 1, a single participant underwent equimolar low-dose intravenous (i.v.) vs s.c. Ex-9 administration; in Part 2, 8 participants were administered single ascending doses of s.c. Ex-9 during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Glycaemic, hormonal, PK and symptomatic responses were compared with those obtained during the baseline OGTT. RESULTS: Although an exposure-response relationship was observed, all doses effectively prevented hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia and improved associated symptoms. On average, the postprandial glucose nadir was increased by 66%, peak insulin was reduced by 57%, and neuroglycopenic symptoms were reduced by 80%. All doses were well tolerated with no treatment-emergent adverse events observed. CONCLUSIONS: Injection s.c. of Ex-9 appears to represent a safe, effective and targeted therapeutic approach for treatment of PBH. Further investigation involving multiple doses with chronic dosing is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hiperinsulinismo/prevención & control , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos de Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/metabolismo , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Semivida , Humanos , Hiperinsulinismo/sangre , Hiperinsulinismo/etiología , Hiperinsulinismo/metabolismo , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Hipoglucemia/metabolismo , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Insulina/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/efectos adversos , Fragmentos de Péptidos/farmacocinética , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/metabolismo , Periodo Posprandial , Método Simple Ciego
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD007222, 2017 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771289

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a form of diabetes that occurs in pregnancy. Although GDM usually resolves following birth, it is associated with significant morbidities for mothers and their infants in the short and long term. There is strong evidence to support treatment for GDM. However, there is uncertainty as to whether or not screening all pregnant women for GDM will improve maternal and infant health and if so, the most appropriate setting for screening. This review updates a Cochrane Review, first published in 2010, and subsequently updated in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings on maternal and infant outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (31 January 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (14 June 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effects of different protocols, guidelines or programmes for screening for GDM based on different risk profiles and settings, compared with the absence of screening, or compared with other protocols, guidelines or programmes for screening. We planned to include trials published as abstracts only and cluster-randomised trials, but we did not identify any. Cross-over trials are not eligible for inclusion in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. We resolved disagreements through discussion or through consulting a third reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: We included two trials that randomised 4523 women and their infants. Both trials were conducted in Ireland. One trial (which quasi-randomised 3742 women, and analysed 3152 women) compared universal screening versus risk factor-based screening, and one trial (which randomised 781 women, and analysed 690 women) compared primary care screening versus secondary care screening. We were not able to perform meta-analyses due to the different interventions and comparisons assessed.Overall, there was moderate to high risk of bias due to one trial being quasi-randomised, inadequate blinding, and incomplete outcome data in both trials. We used GRADEpro GDT software to assess the quality of the evidence for selected outcomes for the mother and her child. Evidence was downgraded for study design limitations and imprecision of effect estimates. Universal screening versus risk-factor screening (one trial) MotherMore women were diagnosed with GDM in the universal screening group than in the risk-factor screening group (risk ratio (RR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 3.04; participants = 3152; low-quality evidence). There were no data reported under this comparison for other maternal outcomes including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, caesarean birth, perineal trauma, gestational weight gain, postnatal depression, and type 2 diabetes. ChildNeonatal outcomes: large-for-gestational age, perinatal mortality, mortality or morbidity composite, hypoglycaemia; and childhood/adulthood outcomes: adiposity, type 2 diabetes, and neurosensory disability, were not reported under this comparison. Primary care screening versus secondary care screening (one trial) MotherThere was no clear difference between the primary care and secondary care screening groups for GDM (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.66; participants = 690; low-quality evidence), hypertension (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.59; participants = 690; low-quality evidence), pre-eclampsia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.78; participants = 690;low-quality evidence), or caesarean section birth (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27; participants = 690; low-quality evidence). There were no data reported for perineal trauma, gestational weight gain, postnatal depression, or type 2 diabetes. ChildThere was no clear difference between the primary care and secondary care screening groups for large-for-gestational age (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.96; participants = 690; low-quality evidence), neonatal complications: composite outcome, including: hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, shoulder dystocia, five minute Apgar less than seven at one or five minutes, prematurity (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.71; participants = 690; low-quality evidence), or neonatal hypoglycaemia (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.38; participants = 690; very low-quality evidence). There was one perinatal death in the primary care screening group and two in the secondary care screening group (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.10 to 12.12; participants = 690; very low-quality evidence). There were no data for neurosensory disability, or childhood/adulthood adiposity or type 2 diabetes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient randomised controlled trial data evaluating the effects of screening for GDM based on different risk profiles and settings on maternal and infant outcomes. Low-quality evidence suggests universal screening compared with risk factor-based screening leads to more women being diagnosed with GDM. Low to very low-quality evidence suggests no clear differences between primary care and secondary care screening, for outcomes: GDM, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, caesarean birth, large-for-gestational age, neonatal complications composite, and hypoglycaemia.Further, high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to assess the value of screening for GDM, which may compare different protocols, guidelines or programmes for screening (based on different risk profiles and settings), with the absence of screening, or with other protocols, guidelines or programmes. There is a need for future trials to be sufficiently powered to detect important differences in short- and long-term maternal and infant outcomes, such as those important outcomes pre-specified in this review. As only a proportion of women will be diagnosed with GDM in these trials, large sample sizes may be required.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Bienestar del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Bienestar Materno , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
Med Sci Monit ; 22: 2602-7, 2016 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27447783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND It is well known that enteral nutrients result in acute suppression of bone turnover markers (BTMs), and incretin hormones are believed to play a significant role in this physiological skeletal response. However, there is limited research exploring the impact of parenteral nutrients on BTMs. Our aim was to assess the influence of intravenous glucose on BTMs in adults with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted 1-h intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) in 24 subjects with NGT. Blood samples were collected before and 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 min after administration of glucose, then serum levels of bone formation marker procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and resorption marker C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of collagen type I (CTX) were measured. RESULTS During IVGTT, the fasting CTX level fell gradually and reached a nadir of 80.4% of the basal value at 60 min. Conversely, the fasting P1NP level decreased mildly and reached a nadir of 90.6% of the basal value at 15 min, then gradually increased and reached 96.6% at 60 min. The CTX-to-P1NP ratio increased slightly and reached a peak of 104.3% of the basal value at 10 min, then fell gradually and reached a nadir of 83% at 60 min. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that intravenous glucose results in an acute suppression of BTMs in the absence of incretin hormones. The mechanism responsible for this needs further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Colágeno Tipo I/sangre , Femenino , Glucosa/metabolismo , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Incretinas/metabolismo , Masculino , Osteocalcina/sangre , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Procolágeno/sangre
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD007222, 2014 Feb 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24515533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a form of diabetes that occurs in pregnancy. Although GDM usually resolves following birth, it is associated with significant morbidities for mother and baby both perinatally and in the long term. There is strong evidence to support treatment for GDM. However, there is little consensus on whether or not screening for GDM will improve maternal and infant health and if so, the most appropriate protocol to follow. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different methods of screening for GDM and maternal and infant outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 December 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effects of different methods of screening for GDM. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and quality assessment. We resolved disagreements through discussion or through a third author. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials involving 3972 women in the review. One quasi-randomised trial compared risk factor screening with universal or routine screening by 50 g oral glucose challenge testing. Women in the universal screening group were more likely to be diagnosed with GDM (one trial, 3152 women, risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.75). This trial did not report on the other primary outcomes of the review (positive screen for GDM, mode of birth, large-for-gestational age, or macrosomia). Considering secondary outcomes, infants of mothers in the risk factor screening group were born marginally earlier than infants of mothers in the routine screening group (one trial, 3152 women, mean difference (MD) -0.15 weeks, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.03).The remaining three trials evaluated different methods of administering a 50 g glucose load. Two small trials compared glucose monomer with glucose polymer testing, with one of these trials including a candy bar group. One trial compared a glucose solution with food. No differences in diagnosis of GDM were found between each comparison. However, in one trial significantly more women in the glucose monomer group screened positive for GDM than women in the candy bar group (80 women, RR 3.49, 95% CI 1.05 to 11.57). The three trials did not report on the primary review outcomes of mode of birth, large-for-gestational age or macrosomia. Overall, women drinking the glucose monomer experienced fewer side effects from testing than women drinking the glucose polymer (two trials, 151 women, RR 2.80, 95% CI 1.10 to 7.13). However, we observed substantial heterogeneity between the trials for this result (I² = 61%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to determine if screening for gestational diabetes, or what types of screening, can improve maternal and infant health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Bienestar del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Bienestar Materno , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
7.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 24(1-2): 55-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21528816

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between PPAR-gamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and laboratory characteristics of carbohydrate metabolism in children and adolescents with obesity. In addition, serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and soluble form of its receptors (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) were assessed. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 79 obese children and adolescents of Caucasian origin were investigated. PPAR-gamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism was determined using polymerase chain reaction--restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Serum levels of TNF-alpha, sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 were measured by enzyme amplified sensitivity immunoassay. RESULTS: The minor Ala allele frequency was found to be 14.56% in our cohort. No significant differences in age, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, serum lipid, uric acid, TNF-alpha, sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 values were found between carriers of the Ala allele (Pro/Ala and Ala/Ala; n=21) vs. homozygous carriers of the Pro allele (Pro/Pro; n=58). However, post-challenge (120 min) plasma glucose and insulin values were significantly lower in Ala allele carriers vs. homozygous Pro allele carriers (6.56 +/- 0.26 vs. 7.36 +/- 0.25 mmol/L and 65.9 +/- 13.8 vs. 111.8 +/- 20.7 microU/mL, respectively; p < 0.05); while no significant differences were found at fasting state. CONCLUSIONS: The association between PPAR-gamma2 Prol2Ala polymorphism and glucose metabolism is already present in children and adolescents with obesity who might be at the very beginning of the natural course of type 2 diabetes. At this stage, higher insulin sensitivity can be detected in Ala allele carriers compared to homozygous Pro subjects at post-challenge but not in fasting state; however, the TNF-system seems not to be involved in the alteration of glucose homeostasis due to PPAR-gamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Metabolismo de la Glucosa/genética , Glucosa/metabolismo , Obesidad/genética , Obesidad/metabolismo , PPAR gamma/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Adolescente , Alanina/genética , Sustitución de Aminoácidos/genética , Sustitución de Aminoácidos/fisiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Glucosa/fisiología , Trastornos del Metabolismo de la Glucosa/complicaciones , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Homeostasis/genética , Homeostasis/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/sangre , Obesidad/complicaciones , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/fisiología , Prolina/genética
8.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 60(4): 723-727, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247814

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Acute hyperglycemia affects the fetoplacental circulation. This study aims to investigate the possible effect of acute hyperglycemia induced by 50 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on fetoplacental circulation in women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019 and April 2019, a total of 29 women who were between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation with a singleton gestation and were in low-risk group were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent fetal biometric measurements using ultrasonography (USG) and were administered 50 g OGTT. Before and 1 h after the test, Doppler USG was used to measure uterine artery, umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio. The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated as the ratio of the MCA-PI/UA-PI. RESULTS: There was a decline in the MCA-RI (p = 0.008) and UA-PI (p = 0.021) at 1 h after the administration of 50 g OGTT. Z-scores of the mean UA-PI, MCA-PI, and CPR were calculated and a statistically significant increase in the Z-scores of the mean UA-PI was observed (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our study results show that acute hyperglycemia induced by OGTT significantly increases the Z-scores of the UA-PI, affecting the fetoplacental circulation.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Circulación Placentaria/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/inducido químicamente , Arteria Cerebral Media/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Flujo Pulsátil/efectos de los fármacos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Resistencia Vascular/efectos de los fármacos
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (7): CD007222, 2010 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20614455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a form of diabetes that occurs in pregnancy. Although GDM usually resolves following birth, it is associated with significant morbidities for mother and baby both perinatally and in the long term. There is strong evidence to support treatment for GDM. However, there is little consensus on whether or not screening for GDM will improve maternal and infant health and if so, the most appropriate protocol to follow. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different methods of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal and infant outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effects of different methods of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and quality assessment. We resolved disagreements through discussion or through a third author. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials involving 3972 women were included in the review. One quasi-randomised trial compared risk factor screening with universal or routine screening by 50 g oral glucose challenge testing. Women in the universal screening group were more likely to be diagnosed with GDM (one trial, 3152 women, risk ratio (RR) 0.44 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.75). Infants of mothers in the risk factor screening group were born marginally earlier than infants of mothers in the routine screening group (one trial, 3152 women, mean difference -0.15 weeks, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.53).The remaining three trials evaluated different methods of administering a 50 g glucose load. Two small trials compared glucose monomer with glucose polymer testing, with one of these trials including a candy bar group. One trial compared a glucose solution with food. No differences in diagnosis of GDM were found between each comparison. Overall, women drinking the glucose monomer experienced fewer side effects from testing than women drinking the glucose polymer (two trials, 151 women, RR 2.80, 95% CI 1.10 to 7.13). However, we observed high heterogeneity between the trials for this result (I(2) = 61%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to determine if screening for gestational diabetes, or what types of screening, can improve maternal and infant health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Bienestar del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Bienestar Materno , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
10.
Arch Endocrinol Metab ; 64(1): 82-88, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187262

RESUMEN

Objective The insulin tolerance test (ITT) has been accepted as the gold standard test for assessing the integrity of the growth hormone (GH) - insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) axis and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The goal of the test is to achieve clinical and biochemical hypoglycemia at a blood glucose level ≤ 40 mg/dL to effectively and correctly assess the HPA and GH-IGF-1 axes. In this study, the GH and cortisol responses of patients who achieved and failed to achieve biochemical hypoglycemia during an ITT were compared. Subjects and methods One hundred thirty-five patients with pituitary disorders were included in the study. Samples for blood glucose levels were obtained after clear symptoms of clinical hypoglycemia developed. The patients were enrolled in the hypoglycemic and nonhypoglycemic groups according to whether their plasma glucose level ≤ 40 mg/dL or > 40 mg/dL during an ITT, and the groups were compared in terms of their GH and cortisol responses. Results The mean age, body mass index and waist circumference of the two patient groups were found to be similar. The mean blood glucose level was significantly lower in the hypoglycemic group than in the nonhypoglycemic group (19.3 and 52.0 mg/dL, respectively). When the two groups were compared in terms of peak cortisol and GH responses, no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion The data presented suggest that clinically symptomatic hypoglycemia is as effective as biochemically confirmed hypoglycemia during an ITT. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(1):82-8.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/sangre , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Factor I del Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/análisis , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/diagnóstico , Hipoglucemia/metabolismo , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema Hipófiso-Suprarrenal/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Transl Med ; 7: 52, 2009 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19558686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is well known risk factor for thrombotic events. The association between diabetes and venous thromboembolism is still matter of debate. However, during diabetes an acquired thrombophilia is present and is due to the non-enzymatic glycosilation of clotting inhibitors as antithrombin thus leading to hypercoagulable state. A possibile relationship between the presence of FVL gene variant in type 1 or type 2 diabetes has been hypothysed by several reports in the Literature with non-univocal findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively we analysed nearly 7000 patients referred to our Thrombosis Center for venous thromboembolism (VTE) then we selected 115 patients underwent to the screening for inherited thrombophilia. All selected patients were divided in 2 groups: the first group (group A) included 64 patients with previous VTE and carriers of factor V Leiden, while the second group (group B) included 51 patients with previous VTE and evetually carriers of thrombophilic defects other than factor V Leiden. Patients of group B acted as control group. 75 g oral glucose tolerance Test (OGTT) recommended by WHO was perfomed to all subjects in the study in order to screen subjects with glucose reduced tolerance or subjects with inducible diabetes. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA 6 http://www.stata.com with Student t test for unpaired data, with chi2 test or with Fisher exact test where appropriated; differences were considered to be significant if p < 0.05. RESULTS: We did not find sifferences between glycaemia at baseline and after OGTT between patients with VTE carriers of FVL compared to non-carriers of FVL. We found a relevant increase in the prevalence of IGT and diabetes between patients with VTE carriers of FVL compared to non-carriers of FVL although this increase did not raise statistical significance. DISCUSSION: our data pointed out an interesting aspect of the linking between FVL gene variant, diabetes and atherothrombosis and other vascular complications, although data on larger population are needed; this aspect may be another relevant topic of research based because also a link between the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis and atherothrombosis has been recently reported in the Literature.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Factor V/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Variación Genética , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Guías como Asunto , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombofilia/epidemiología , Trombofilia/genética , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/genética
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(10): 759-65, 2008 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18490688

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: Update of 2003 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation about screening for gestational diabetes. METHODS: The USPSTF weighed the evidence on maternal and neonatal benefits (reduction in preeclampsia, mortality, brachial plexus injury, clavicular fractures, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit for serious illnesses) and harms (physical and psychological harms) of screening for gestational diabetes identified for their 2003 recommendation and the accompanying systematic review of articles published since the 2003 review for screening after 24 weeks' gestation. Additional searches were performed for evidence published from 1966 to 1999 on screening before 24 weeks. RECOMMENDATION: Current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus, either before or after 24 weeks' gestation. (I statement.).


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Gestacional/prevención & control , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/normas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(10): 766-75, 2008 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18490689

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2003, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that evidence was insufficient to advise for or against routinely screening all pregnant women for gestational diabetes mellitus. PURPOSE: To review evidence about the benefits and harms of screening for gestational diabetes. DATA SOURCES: Databases (MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness, and Cochrane Library) were searched for reports published from January 2000 to 15 November 2007 (and from 1966 to 1999 for additional studies on screening at less than 24 weeks' gestation), citations in the 2003 evidence report, and studies identified through consultation of experts and searches of bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies that used standard 1- or 2-step testing for gestational diabetes and that evaluated at least 1 of the following outcomes: neonatal mortality; brachial plexus injury; clavicular fracture; admission to a neonatal intensive care unit for hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, or the respiratory distress syndrome; maternal mortality; and preeclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 reviewers evaluated 1607 abstracts, critically appraised 288 articles, and qualitatively synthesized 13 studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: No randomized, controlled trials that directly evaluated the risks and benefits of gestational diabetes screening were found. One good-quality randomized, controlled trial of treatment of mild gestational diabetes in a screening-detected population supported a reduction in serious neonatal complications and showed that gestational diabetes treatment also reduced the risk for gestational hypertension. Very limited evidence was found to evaluate early screening for gestational diabetes (before 24 weeks' gestation). Limited evidence suggests that serious maternal hypoglycemia is rare with treatment and that overall quality of life is not worse among women receiving gestational diabetes treatment compared with women not receiving treatment. LIMITATION: The literature is limited by lack of a consistent standard for screening or diagnosis of gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence suggests that gestational diabetes treatment after 24 weeks improves some maternal and neonatal outcomes. Evidence is even more sparse for screening before 24 weeks' gestation.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Gestacional/prevención & control , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/normas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Mortalidad Materna , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
14.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 142: 110-119, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29857092

RESUMEN

AIM: We investigated the association of impaired glucose metabolism with tooth loss in adults in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Study 1966 (NFBC1966). METHODS: We examined 4394 participants from the 46-year follow-up of the NFBC1966. Self-reported number of teeth as well as insulin and glucose values, taken during a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), served as the primary study variables. A multinomial logistic regression model served to analyse (unadjusted, smoking-adjusted and fully adjusted) the association between number of teeth (0-24, 25-27, 28-32) and glucose metabolism in women and men. RESULTS: Among women, type 2 diabetes - whether previously known or detected during screening - pointed to a higher likelihood of 0-24 teeth (fully adjusted OR = 2.99, 95%CI = 1.54-5.80) and 25-27 teeth (OR = 1.91, 95%CI = 1.18-3.08) than did normal glucose tolerance. Similarly, impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance together indicated a higher likelihood of 0-24 teeth (OR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.09-2.69) than did normal glucose tolerance. A similar, statistically non-significant, pattern emerged among men. Number of teeth associated with OGTT insulin and glucose curves as well as with the Matsuda index in both women and men. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth loss strongly associated with impaired glucose metabolism in middle-aged Finnish women.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/complicaciones , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Pérdida de Diente/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Finlandia , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Clin Invest Med ; 30(3): E118-26, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17716550

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Postprandial myocardial ischemia has been observed in frail older adults with postprandial hypotension and in patients with severe coronary artery disease, especially after high doses of carbohydrates. The impact of oral glucose on myocardial oxygen supply and demand in healthy older adults without postprandial hypotension or postprandial angina remains unexamined. We hypothesized that oral glucose would result in decreased myocardial oxygen supply relative to demand in a healthy older subject pool free of postprandial hypotension, reversible coronary risk factors and postprandial angina. METHODS: 19 older adults (mean age 71.9+/-1.1 yr) were screened for reversible coronary risk factors. Subjects were given a standardized oral glucose load (75 g) or a sham isovolumetric unsweetened drink during two separate sessions. Indirect measures of oxygen supply (Diastolic Pressure Time Index, DPTI) and demand (Rate Pressure Product, RPP; Systolic Pressure Time Index, SPTI) were obtained from aortic arterial blood pressure waveforms. The Subendocardial Viability Ratio (SEVR, DPTI/SPTI) and DPTI/RPP were also calculated. RESULTS: Oral glucose resulted in decreases in both SEVR (P=0.016) and DPTI/RPP (P=0.028) in the glucose session, indicating a decrease in the relative myocardial oxygen supply to demand. This was due solely to a decrease in myocardial oxygen supply while measures of myocardial oxygen demand did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Oral glucose decreases myocardial oxygen supply in older adults free of severe coronary artery disease and without postprandial hypotension. This represents a previously unrecognized complication of oral glucose tolerance tests in healthy older adults.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Glucosa/administración & dosificación , Glucosa/farmacocinética , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/metabolismo , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Consumo de Oxígeno/efectos de los fármacos
16.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 30(5): 525-530, 2017 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28328533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the relationships among circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and glucose or insulin in children and adolescents. The objective of this study was to investigate whether circulating BDNF levels would change during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). METHODS: We performed the OGTT and measured the serial changes in BDNF levels in both plasma and serum. RESULTS: There were 22 subjects in the normal type (N) group and 20 in the borderline/diabetic type (B/D) group, defined by the results of the OGTT. Serum levels of BDNF were almost five times higher and plasma levels gradually decreased during the OGTT, whereas serum levels showed no significant change. The reduction of plasma BDNF level changes from baseline to 120 min were significantly different between the N and B/D groups (36.3% vs. 20.8%, p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that plasma levels of BDNF are more sensitive to acute changes in glucose or insulin levels than serum.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/etiología , Adolescente , Glucemia/análisis , Niño , Preescolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Insulina/sangre , Masculino
17.
Physiol Res ; 66(6): 993-999, 2017 12 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28937255

RESUMEN

A personalized antidiabetic therapy is not yet part of the official guidelines of professional societies for clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the serum C-peptide and plasma glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after oral administration of whey proteins. Sixteen overweight T2DM Caucasians with good glycemic control and with preserved fasting serum C-peptide levels (>200 nmol/l) were enrolled in this study. Two oral stimulation tests - one with 75 g of glucose (OGTT) and the other with 75 g of whey proteins (OWIST) - were administered for assessing serum C-peptide and plasma glucose levels in each participant. Both oral tests induced similar pattern of C-peptide secretion, with a peak at 90 min. The serum C-peptide peak concentration was 2.91+/-0.27 nmol/l in OWIST, which was 22 % lower than in OGTT. Similarly, the C-peptide iAUC(0-180) were 32 % lower in the OWIST than in the OGTT (p<0.01). Contrary to OGTT the OWIST did not cause a significant increase of glycemia (p<0.01). Our study showed that the OWIST represents a useful tool in estimation of stimulated serum C-peptide levels in patients with T2DM.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Péptido C/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Proteína de Suero de Leche/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Cruzados , República Checa , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Tiempo , Proteína de Suero de Leche/efectos adversos
18.
Arch Endocrinol Metab ; 60(4): 307-13, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26910630

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is used in the screening of gestational diabetes, in diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in conjunction with fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and risk factors of adverse effects of OGTT in patients who underwent bariatric surgery, in addition to proposing standardization for ordering the OGTT in these patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study assessed the incidence of adverse effects in 128 post-bariatric surgery patients who underwent the OGTT. Descriptive and logistic regression analysis were performed, the dependent variables were defined as the presence of signs (tremor, profuse sweating, tachycardia), symptoms (nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, weakness), and hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤ 50 mg/dL). RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen participants (91.4%) were female; 38 (29.7%) participants were pregnant. High incidence (64.8%) of adverse effects was observed: nausea (38.4%), dizziness (30.5%), weakness (25.8%), diarrhea (23.4%), hypoglycemia (14.8%), tachycardia (14.1%), tremor (13.3%), profuse sweating (12.5%) and one case of severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL). The presence of signs was associated with hypoglycemia (OR = 8.1, CI 95% 2.6-25.1). The arterial hypertension persisted as a risk factor for the incidence of signs (OR = 3.6, CI 95% 1.2-11.3). Fasting glucose below 75 mg/dL increased the risk of hypoglycemia during the test (OR = 9.5, CI 95% 2.6-35.1). CONCLUSION: In this study, high incidence of adverse effects during the OGTT was observed in post-bariatric surgery patients. If these results are confirmed by further studies, the indication and regulation of the OGTT procedure must be reviewed for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Adulto , Glucemia/análisis , Brasil/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Dislipidemias/etiología , Ayuno/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipotiroidismo/epidemiología , Hipotiroidismo/etiología , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Posoperatorio , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 36(3): 731-8, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10987592

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether hyperinsulinemia during the oral glucose tolerance test is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in nondiabetic patients. BACKGROUND: Although hyperinsulinemia induces increased vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in experimental models, it has not been determined whether hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation. METHODS: Serial (postintervention and six-month follow-up) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to study 67 lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents in 55 nondiabetic patients. Cross-sectional images within stents were taken at every 1 mm, using an automatic pullback, and a neointimal index was calculated as the ratio between the averaged neointimal area and averaged stent area. All patients underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Plasma glucose (PG) and immunoreactive insulin (IRI) levels were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 h after the glucose load. The sum of PGs (sigmaPG) and the sum of IRIs (sigmaIRI) were calculated. Body mass index (BMI), lipid levels, and glycosylated hemoglobin levels were measured. RESULTS: There were 27 patients with normal glucose tolerance, and 28 patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The neointimal index in patients with IGT was greater than that in patients with normal glucose tolerance (42.9 +/- 14% vs. 24.9 +/- 8.3%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed that the neointimal index at follow-up correlated well with sigmaPG (p < 0.0001), fasting IRI (p < 0.0001), sigmaIRI (p < 0.0001), triglyceride level (p = 0.018), and BMI (p < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that sigmaIRI (p = 0.0002) and sigmaPG (p = 0.0034) were the best predictors of the greater neointimal index at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Serial IVUS assessment shows that hyperinsulinemia during an oral glucose tolerance test is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in nondiabetic patients.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Coronarios , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Hiperinsulinismo/etiología , Stents , Túnica Íntima/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperinsulinismo/fisiopatología , Resistencia a la Insulina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
20.
Arch Intern Med ; 162(2): 209-16, 2002 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11802755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The contributions of fasting and 2-hour postchallenge glucose level to cardiovascular events remain ill-defined, especially for nondiabetic adults. This study examined the relative predictive power of fasting and 2-hour glucose level on cardiovascular event risk. METHODS: A total of 4014 community-dwelling adults 65 years or older who participated in the baseline visit of the Cardiovascular Health Study and who were without treated diabetes or previous myocardial infarction or stroke were eligible for analyses. Participants with treated diabetes at baseline were excluded. Incident myocardial infarction or stroke, or coronary death, was the outcome of interest. Age-, sex-, and race-adjusted proportional hazards regression models described individual and joint associations between baseline measures of fasting and 2-hour postchallenge glucose level and event risk. RESULTS: There were 764 incident cardiovascular events during 8.5 years of follow-up. Fasting glucose level of 115 mg/dL (6.4 mmol/L) or more was associated with an increased cardiovascular risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39-1.98]) in adjusted analyses compared with fasting glucose level less than 115 mg/dL. Two-hour glucose level was associated with a linear risk (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] per 10 mg/dL [0.6 mmol/L]) that included an additional increase in risk for 2-hour glucose level of 154 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L) or more (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.59]) in adjusted analyses. In joint fasting and 2-hour glucose models, only 2-hour glucose level remained predictive of event risk. CONCLUSIONS: Two-hour glucose level was better than fasting glucose level alone at identifying older adults at increased risk of major incident cardiovascular events.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Ayuno/sangre , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA