Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Chest ; 131(6): 1932-5, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17565027

RESUMEN

Methacholine challenge testing (MCT), also sometimes described as bronchoprovocation testing, is widely performed for both research and diagnostic purposes. MCT is clinically useful when the patient presents with a history of symptoms suggesting asthma, but spirometry findings are normal. Typically, MCT is performed in a pulmonary function laboratory, a clinic, or a physician's office. MCT requires time, effort, and understanding. Two standard testing regimes are identified along with proper coding and reimbursement methodologies.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial/economía , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial/métodos , Cloruro de Metacolina , Asma/clasificación , Asma/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial/efectos adversos , Control de Formularios y Registros , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Cloruro de Metacolina/efectos adversos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espirometría
3.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 21(4): 153-7, 1993.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8237720

RESUMEN

This study was undertaken for two reasons: 1) It is more difficult to diagnose hypersensitivity to molds than to other allergens, so an evaluation of diagnostic tests was needed. 2) Alternaria is the principal cause of mold sensitization in our area. Sixty-six patients (20 +/- 4 years) were selected and divided into two groups. Group A was made up of patients with rhinitis and/or asthma due to Alternaria sensitization. Group B consisted of patients sensitized to other allergens and patients with nonrespiratory allergic disorders. Skin tests (prick and intradermal), challenge tests (conjunctival, nasal, and bronchial), and specific IgE determination were performed for all patients. A biologically standardized extract of Alternaria tenuis (Alergia e Inmunología Abelló, S. A., Madrid, Spain) obtained from a single batch was used for all tests. Our diagnostic criterion was a clinical history of rhinitis or asthma that coincided with the results of nasal/bronchial challenge. The diagnostic value of the other tests was compared to this criterion. In the group of rhinitic patients, skin tests and conjunctival challenge were more sensitive than specific IgE determination. In asthmatic patients, the most sensitive techniques were nasal and conjunctival challenges, followed by prick and intradermal skin tests, and, lastly, serum specific IgE determination. When rhinitis and asthma were considered jointly, the most sensitive test was conjunctival challenge, followed by skin-prick and intradermal tests. All tests had the same specificity, regardless of disorder. Nasal challenge was positive in all patients. Skin tests are easy to perform, cheap, non-traumatic for the patient, and sufficiently specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of Alternaria hypersensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Asunto(s)
Alternaria/inmunología , Asma/diagnóstico , Pruebas Inmunológicas/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/etiología , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/etiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/economía , Extractos Vegetales , Prueba de Radioalergoadsorción/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/etiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA