Lipid-Gelucire based rectal delivery of ramipril prodrug exhibits significant lowering of intra-ocular pressure in normotensive rabbit: sustained structural relaxation release kinetics and IVIVC.

Carboxylesterase enzymes convert a prodrug ramipril into the biologically active metabolite ramiprilat. It is prescribed for controlling ocular hypertension after oral administration. High concentrations of carboxylesterase enzymes in rectal and colon tissue can transform ramipril significantly to ramiprilat. Sustained rectal delivery of ramipril has been developed for intra-ocular pressure lowering effect using a normotensive rabbit model. Rectal suppositories have been formulated using a matrix base of HPMC K100-PEG 400-PEG 6000, incorporating varying amounts of Gelucire by the fusion moulding method. The presence of Gelucire in the suppository exhibited sustained structural relaxation-based release kinetics of RM compared to its absence. Intravenous and oral administration of ramipril has decreased IOP in the treated rabbit up to 90 and 360 min, respectively. Treated rabbits with suppositories have revealed decreased IOP for an extended period compared to the above. Formulation containing GEL 3% reduced intra-ocular pressure to 540 min, with the highest area under the decreased IOP curve. Compared to oral, the pharmacodynamic bioavailability of ramipril has been improved significantly using a sustained-release rectal suppository. A rectal suppository for sustained delivery of ramipril could be used to lower IOP significantly.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic heart failure.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented challenge. Meeting this has resulted in changes to working practices and the impact on the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective, observational study contrasting patients diagnosed with HFrEF attending specialist heart failure clinics at a UK hospital, whose subsequent period of optimisation of medical therapy was during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients diagnosed the previous year. The primary outcome was the change in equivalent dosing of ramipril and bisoprolol at 6-months. Secondary outcomes were the number and type of follow-up consultations, hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause mortality. In total, 60 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF between 1 December 2019 and 30 April 2020, compared to 54 during the same period of the previous year. The absolute number of consultations was higher (390 vs 270; p = 0.69), driven by increases in telephone consultations, with a reduction in appointments with hospital nurse specialists. After 6-months, we observed lower equivalent dosing of ramipril (3.1 ± 3.0 mg vs 4.4 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.035) and similar dosing of bisoprolol (4.1 ± 0.5 mg vs 4.9 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.27), which persisted for ramipril (mean difference 1.0 mg, 95% CI 0.018-2.09; p = 0.046) and bisoprolol (mean difference 0.52 mg, 95% CI -0.23-1.28; p = 0.17) after adjustment for baseline dosing. We observed no differences in the proportion of patients who died (5.0% vs 7.4%; p = 0.59) or were hospitalised with heart failure (13.3% vs 9.3%; p = 0.49). Our study suggests the transition to telephone appointments and re-deployment of heart failure nurse specialists was associated with less successful optimisation of medical therapy, especially renin-angiotensin inhibitors, compared with usual care.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Reduces Radiation-Induced Periprosthetic Capsular Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The capsular contracture is one of the main complications after radiotherapy in patients with implant-based reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ramipril for the prevention of radiation-induced fibrosis around the silicone implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats in 5 groups were used. Group 1: implant; group 2: implant + radiation; group 3: ramipril + implant; group 4: ramipril + implant + radiation; group 5: sham. Ramipril treatment was started 5 d before surgery and continued for 12 wk after surgery. A mini silicone implant was placed in the back of the rats. A single fraction of 21.5 Gy radiation was applied. Tissues were examined histologically and immunohistochemically (TGF-ß1, MMP-2, and TIMP-2 expression). The alteration of plasma TGF-ß1 levels was examined before and after the experiment. RESULTS: After applying implant or implant + radiation, capsular thickness, percentage of fibrotic area, tissue and plasma TGF-ß1 levels significantly increased, and MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio significantly decreased compared with the sham group. In ramipril-treated groups, the decrease in capsular thickness, fibrosis, TGF-ß1 positivity, and an increase in MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio were found significant. In the ramipril + implant + radiation group, the alteration values of TGF-ß1 dramatically decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that ramipril reduces radiation-induced fibrosis and contracture. The results of our study may be important for the design of the clinical trials required to investigate the effective and safe doses of ramipril, which is an inexpensive and easily tolerated drug, on humans.

Drug Testing for Residual Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease in Mice Beyond Therapy with Metformin, Ramipril, and Empagliflozin.

BACKGROUND: Progression of CKD in type 2 diabetes, despite dual inhibition of sodium-glucose transporter-2 and the renin-angiotensin system, remains a concern. Bromoindirubin-3'-oxime (BIO), previously reported to promote podocyte survival and regeneration, is a candidate additional drug to elicit renoprotective effects beyond therapy with metformin, ramipril, and empagliflozin (MRE). Evaluating a drug with standard therapeutics more closely mimics the clinical setting than evaluating the drug alone. METHODS: Uninephrectomized BKS-Lepr-/- (db/db) mice treated with or without MRE served as a model of progressive CKD in type 2 diabetes. Mice on or off MRE were randomized to only 4 weeks of add-on BIO or vehicle. The primary end point was slope of GFR (ΔGFR). RESULTS: Four weeks of MRE treatment alone did not affect ΔGFR, but significantly attenuated hyperglycemia, albuminuria, and glomerulosclerosis and increased podocyte filtration slit density, as assessed by STED super-resolution microscopy upon tissue clearing. BIO alone improved albuminuria, podocyte density in superficial and juxtamedullary nephrons, and podocyte filtration slit density. MRE+BIO combination therapy had additive protective effects on ΔGFR, glomerulosclerosis, podocyte density in juxtamedullary nephrons, and filtration slit density. CONCLUSIONS: Add-on treatment with BIO for only 4 weeks attenuates progression of CKD beyond MRE therapy in mice with type 2 diabetes. Additional drug combinations may help to further delay ESKD in type 2 diabetes.

Effects of Sevelamer Carbonate in Patients With CKD and Proteinuria: The ANSWER Randomized Trial.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with increased risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and reduced antiproteinuric effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. We investigated whether the phosphate binder sevelamer carbonate may enhance the antiproteinuric effect of RAS inhibitors in patients with CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Between November 2013 and December 2014, we enrolled 53 patients with CKD with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs)>15mL/min/1.73m2 and residual proteinuria with protein excretion≥0.5g/24h despite maximal tolerated ramipril and/or irbesartan therapy from 2 nephrology units in Italy. INTERVENTION: After stratification by serum phosphate level, ≤4 or>4mg/dL, patients were randomly assigned to 3 months of sevelamer (1,600mg thrice daily) treatment followed by 3 months without sevelamer separated by a 1-month washout period or 3 months without sevelamer followed by 3 months with sevelamer, also separated by a 1-month washout period. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was 24-hour proteinuria (n=49patients). Secondary outcomes included measured GFR (using iohexol plasma clearance), office blood pressure (BP), serum lipid levels, levels of inflammation and bone metabolism biomarkers, urinary electrolyte levels, and arterial stiffness. RESULTS: Changes in proteinuria during the 3-month treatment with (from 1.36 [IQR, 0.77-2.51] to 1.36 [IQR, 0.77-2.60] g/24h) or without (from 1.36 [IQR, 0.99-2.38] to 1.48 [IQR, 0.81-2.77] g/24h) sevelamer were similar (P=0.1). Sevelamer reduced urinary phosphate excretion without affecting serum phosphate levels. Sevelamer reduced C-reactive protein (CRP), glycated hemoglobin, and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels without affecting levels of office BP, measured GFR, fibroblast growth factor 23, klotho, intact parathyroid hormone, serum vitamin D, or other urinary electrolytes. Results were similar in the low- and high-phosphate groups. Sevelamer was well tolerated. Adverse events were comparable between treatment periods. One case of transient hypophosphatemia was observed during treatment with sevelamer. LIMITATIONS: Short treatment duration, lower pretreatment proteinuria than expected. CONCLUSIONS: 3-month sevelamer treatment did not reduce proteinuria in patients with CKD on maximal RAS blockade. Amelioration of inflammation and dyslipidemia with sevelamer treatment raises the possibility that it may confer benefit in patients with CKD beyond reduction of proteinuria. FUNDING: Sanofi (Milan, Italy). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT01968759.

Assessment of a guideline-based heart substructures delineation in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy : Quality assessment within a randomized phase III trial testing a cardioprotective treatment strategy (SAFE-2014).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In our institute, breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment are included in a protocol aimed to reduce cardiovascular morbidity (SAFE-2014, NCT2236806), assessing preclinical heart damage with heart speckle-tracking ultrasound. To develop a dose constraint related to subclinical heart damage, a reliable delineation of heart substructures based on a pre-existing guideline was made. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Heart substructures of 16 left-sided breast cancer patients included in the SAFE protocol were delineated by five operators. For each substructure, a multi-contour delineation based on a majority vote algorithm (MCD) was created. A consensus-based delineation (CBD) was developed by an independent team of two blinded operators. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) between volumes delineated by different operators and the MCD were collected and reported, as well as DSC between CBD and MCD. RESULTS: Mean DSCs between heart chambers delineated by each operator and the corresponding MCDs ranged between 0.78 and 0.96. Mean DSC between substructures delineated by all single operators and the corresponding MCD ranged between 0.84 and 0.94. Mean DSC between CBD and the corresponding MCD ranged from 0.89 to 0.97. CONCLUSION: Results showed low inter-observer variability of heart substructure delineation. This constitutes an external validation of the contouring atlas used, allowing a reliable dosimetric assessment of these volumes within the SAFE-2014 trial.

Ramipril and resveratrol co-treatment attenuates RhoA/ROCK pathway-regulated early-stage diabetic nephropathy-associated glomerulosclerosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Clinical studies have shown that hyperglycemia can induce early-stage diabetic nephropathy (DN). Furthermore, oxidative stress, tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition and extracellular matrix accumulation promote the progression of DN to chronic kidney disease and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. It is necessary to initiate treatment at the early stages of DN or even during the early stages of diabetes. In this work, rats with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes mellitus (DM) presented early DN symptoms within 45 days, and collagen accumulation in the glomerulus of the rats was primarily mediated through the RhoA/ROCK pathway instead of the TGF-ß signaling pathway. Resveratrol (15 mg/kg/day) and ramipril (10 mg/kg/day) co-treatment of STZ-induced DN rats showed that glomerulosclerosis in early-stage DN was reversible (P < .05 compared with that in STZ-induced DM rats). The results of this study support early intervention in diabetes or DN as a more efficient therapeutic strategy.

The International Polycap Study-3 (TIPS-3): Design, baseline characteristics and challenges in conduct.

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that in individuals without clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), but at increased CVD risk, a 50% to 60% reduction in CVD risk could be achieved using fixed dose combination (FDC) therapy (usually comprised of multiple blood-pressure agents and a statin [with or without aspirin]) in a single "polypill". However, the impact of a polypill in preventing clinical CV events has not been evaluated in a large randomized controlled trial. METHODS: TIPS-3 is a 2x2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial that will examine the effect of a FDC polypill on major CV outcomes in a primary prevention population. This study aims to determine whether the Polycap (comprised of atenolol, ramipril, hydrochlorothiazide, and a statin) reduces CV events in persons without a history of CVD, but who are at least at intermediate CVD risk. Additional interventions in the factorial design of the study will compare the effect of (1) aspirin versus placebo on CV events (and cancer), (2) vitamin D versus placebo on the risk of fractures, and (3) the combined effect of aspirin and the Polycap on CV events. RESULTS: The study has randomized 5713 participants across 9 countries. Mean age of the study population is 63.9 years, and 53% are female. Mean INTERHEART risk score is 16.8, which is consistent with a study population at intermediate CVD risk. CONCLUSION: Results of the TIP-3 study will be key to determining the appropriateness of FDC therapy as a strategy in the global prevention of CVD.

How to Treat Hypertension in Venlafaxine-Medicated Patients-Pharmacokinetic Considerations in Prescribing Amlodipine and Ramipril.

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine (AMLO) and ramipril (RAMI) belong to the most prescribed drugs in patients with hypertension, a condition also encountered in depression. Venlafaxine may worsen hypertension because of noradrenergic properties. Although of special clinical relevance, data on pharmacokinetic interactions between AMLO, RAMI, and venlafaxine (VEN) are lacking. METHODS: Two TDM databases consisting of plasma concentrations of VEN and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN) were analyzed. We considered a group of patients comedicated with AMLO, VAMLO (n = 22); a group comedicated with RAMI, VRAMI (n = 20); and a 4:1 control group age matched to the VAMLO group receiving VEN without confounding medications, V0 (n = 88). Plasma concentrations of VEN, ODVEN, and active moiety, AM (VEN + ODVEN); metabolic ratio (ODVEN/VEN); and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D) were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in daily VEN dose, age, or sex. The metabolic ratio (ODVEN/VEN) was lower in the AMLO group (P = 0.029), whereas the RAMI group showed lower values for ODVEN (P = 0.029). All other parameters showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly lower values for the metabolic ratio in the AMLO group are unlikely to be explained by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and weak CYP2D6 inhibition by AMLO. Other factors such as differences in CYP2D6 polymorphisms and metabolizer status may better explain the findings. Ramipril showed modest effects with changes in ODVEN concentrations that did not remain significant after dose-adjusted comparisons.

Early Treatment With Zofenopril and Ramipril in Combination With Acetyl Salicylic Acid in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of a 5-Year Follow-up of Patients of the SMILE-4 Study.

The SMILE-4 study showed that in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after acute myocardial infarction, early treatment with zofenopril plus acetyl salicylic acid is associated with an improved 1-year survival, free from death or hospitalization for cardiovascular (CV) causes, as compared to ramipril plus acetyl salicylic acid. We now report CV outcomes during a 5-year follow-up of the patients of the SMILE-4 study. Three hundred eighty-six of the 518 patients completing the study (51.2%) could be tracked after the study end and 265 could be included in the analysis. During the 5.5 (±2.1) years of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 27.8% of patients originally randomized and treated with zofenopril and in 43.8% of patients treated with ramipril [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval, 0.65 (0.43-0.98), P = 0.041]. Such a result was achieved through a significantly larger reduction in CV hospitalization under zofenopril [OR: 0.61 (0.37-0.99), P = 0.047], whereas reduction in mortality rate with zofenopril did not achieve statistical significance versus ramipril [OR: 0.75 (0.36-1.59), P = 0.459]. These results were in line with those achieved during the initial 1-year follow-up. Benefits of early treatment of patients with LVD after acute myocardial infarction with zofenopril are sustained over many years as compared to ramipril.

Achieving remission of proteinuria in childhood CKD.

BACKGROUND: A multidrug treatment strategy that targets urinary proteins with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) up-titrated to the respective maximum tolerated dose combined with intensified blood pressure (BP) control has been found to prevent renal function loss in adults with proteinuric nephropathies. Herein, we investigated the effects of this treatment protocol in the pediatric patient population. METHODS: From May 2002 to September 2014 we included in this observational, longitudinal, cohort study 20 consecutive children with chronic nephropathies and 24-h proteinuria of >200 mg who had received ramipril and losartan up-titrated to the respective maximum approved and tolerated doses [mean (standard deviation) dose:2.48 (1.37) mg/m2 and 0.61 (0.46) mg/kg daily, respectively]. The primary efficacy endpoint was a >50 % reduction in 24-h proteinuria to <200 mg (remission). Secondary outcomes included changes in proteinuria, serum albumin, BP, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) patient age at inclusion was 13.8 ± 2.8 years, and the median [interquartile range (IQR)] serum creatinine level and proteinuria were 0.7 (0.6-1.0) mg/dl and 690 (379-1270) mg/24 h or 435 (252-711) mg/m2/24 h, respectively. Proteinuria significantly decreased by month 6 of follow-up, and serum albumin levels increased over a median follow-up period of 78 (IQR 39-105) months. In the nine children who achieved remission, proteinuria reduction persisted throughout the whole follow-up without rebounds. The GFR improved in those children who achieved remission and worsened in those who did not. The mean GFR slopes differed significantly between these two groups (p < 0.05), being positive in those children with remission and negative in those without remission (+0.023 ± 0.15 vs.-0.014 ± 0.23 ml/min/1.73 m2/month, respectively), whereas BP control was similar between the two groups. Hyperkalemia was observed in two children. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with maximum approved doses of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is a safe strategy which may achieve proteinuria remission with kidney function stabilization or even improvement in a substantial proportion of children with proteinuric nephropathies.

The effects of alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on central and brachial blood pressure and vascular reactivity: the doxazosin-ramipril study.

We aimed to study whether inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has effects on vascular structure and function beyond the effects on blood pressure reduction alone. Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (n = 61, age 54 ± 12 years, 34% women) received the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril 10 mg or the alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocker doxazosin 8 mg double-blind for 12 weeks. Aortic blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index were assessed by applanation tonometry. Endothelial function was studied by forearm post-ischemic flow mediated vasodilatation and by pulse wave analysis with beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist stimulation. Skin microvascular reactivity was assessed by laser Doppler fluxmetry and iontophoresis. Treatment with doxazosin or ramipril reduced aortic and brachial blood pressures (all P < 0.001), with greater reductions in aortic than brachial systolic blood pressures (P = 0.021) and aortic/brachial pulse pressure ratio (P = 0.005). Compared to doxazosin, ramipril reduced carotid-femoral and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (both P < 0.05). Forearm endothelial dependent and independent vasodilatation, assessed by post-ischemic flow mediated vasodilatation and glyceryl trinitrate, and by pulse wave analysis remained unchanged by both doxazosin and ramipril. In addition, skin microvascular endothelial dependent (acetylcholine) and independent vasodilatation (sodium nitroprusside) remained unchanged. In conclusion, ramipril reduced indices of aortic stiffness, suggesting that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy may have effects beyond blood pressure reduction. However, treatment did not appear to influence endothelial function. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction and its possible improvement by antihypertensive treatment might require more advanced hypertension.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02901977) and at EudraCT (# 2007-000631-25).

[One year adherence of ramipril versus ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy in hypertension]. / A ramipril versus ramipril/amlodipin fix kombináció egyéves perzisztenciája hypertoniás betegekben.

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of hypertension avoiding adverse cardiovascular complications to achieve target blood pressure is essential. The appropriate drug selection, and if necessary to change to combination therapy, patients adherence is important which may help fixed dose combination. AIM: The aim of the authors was to investigate the one year adherence of the ramipril and ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination in hypertensive patients. METHOD: Prescriptions database of the National Health Insurance Fund in Hungary on pharmacy-claims was analysed between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013. The authors identified patients who filled prescriptions for ramipril monotherapy and fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine prescribed for the first time in hypertensive patients who have not received similar drugs in the previous year. To model the adherence, the apparatus of survival analysis was used, where "survival" was the time to abandon the medication. As it was available to month precision, discrete time survival analysis was applied: a generalized linear model was estimated with complementary log-log link function with the kind of drug being the only explanatory variable. RESULTS: 92,546 patients met the inclusion criteria. During the trial period, ramipril therapy or ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination was started in 82,251 and 10,295 patients, respectively. One year persistence rate in patients with ramipril was 30% and 54% in patients with ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy. Considering only the 360-day study period, the mean duration of persistence was 189.9 days in patients on ramipril and 270.6 days on ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy. The hazard of discontinuation was more than twofold higher during treatment with ramipril compared with the use of the ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy (HR = 2.11 [95% CI: 2.05-2.17], p<0,001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference between the one year persistence of ramipril and ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy in hypertension. The result demonstrated that ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy has a better one year persistence rate. When the next step is necessary to achieve target blood pressure, ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy is preferable. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(42): 1668-1673.

Potential vascular mechanisms of ramipril induced increases in walking ability in patients with intermittent claudication.

RATIONALE: We recently reported that ramipril more than doubled maximum walking times in patients with peripheral artery disease with intermittent claudication. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to conduct exploratory analyses of the effects of ramipril therapy on circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis/arteriogenesis, thrombosis, inflammation, and leukocyte adhesion in patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients with intermittent claudication (mean, 65.3 [SD, 6.7] years) were administered ramipril 10 mg per day (n=82) or matching placebo (n=83) for 24 weeks in a randomized, double-blind study. Plasma biomarkers of angiogenesis/arteriogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor-A, fibroblast growth factor-2), thrombosis (D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, thrombin-antithrombin III), inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, osteopontin), and leukocyte adhesion (soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1) were measured at baseline and 24 weeks. Relative to placebo, ramipril was associated with increases in vascular endothelial growth factor-A by 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%-42%) and fibroblast growth factor-2 by 64% (95% CI, 44-85%; P<0.001 for both), and reductions in D-dimer by 24% (95% CI, -30% to -18%), von Willebrand factor by 22% (95% CI, -35% to -9%), thrombin-antithrombin III by 16% (95% CI, -19% to -13%), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein by 13% (95% CI, -14% to -9%), osteopontin by 12% (95% CI, -14% to -10%), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 by 14% (95% CI, -18% to -10%), and soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 by 15% (95% CI, -17% to -13%; all P<0.001). With the exception of von Willebrand factor, all the above changes correlated significantly with the change in maximum walking time (P=0.02-0.001) in the group treated with ramipril. CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril is associated with an increase in the biomarkers of angiogenesis/arteriogenesis and reduction in the markers of thrombosis, inflammation, and leukocyte adhesion. This study informs strategies to improve mobility in patients with intermittent claudication. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00681226.

Ramipril and metoprolol intake aggravate human and murine anaphylaxis: evidence for direct mast cell priming.

BACKGROUND: Cofactors contribute to the elicitation of anaphylaxis. ß-Blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used cardiovascular drugs. We specially designed a mouse model to further analyze the cofactor potential of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that ß-blockers and ACE inhibitors alter the risk for severe anaphylaxis and to pinpoint the associated mechanism. METHODS: The risk factor potency of cardiovascular drugs on the severity of anaphylaxis in patients from German-speaking countries was analyzed. In vivo interaction of the cardiovascular drugs metoprolol (ß-blocker) and ramipril (ACE inhibitor) with the anaphylactic response was determined. Mast cell (MC) mediators (histamine, serotonin, leukotriene C4, prostaglandin D2, and mouse mast cell protease 1) were quantified in serum. Bone marrow-derived cultured MCs served to identify whether the therapeutics targeted MCs directly. RESULTS: Our anaphylaxis database indicated a higher risk of severe anaphylaxis after monotherapy with ß-blockers or ACE inhibitors, which was more pronounced when both drugs were combined. This was confirmed in our mouse model. While single therapeutics had either no significant (ramipril) or a modestly aggravating (metoprolol) effect, their combined administration exacerbated anaphylactic symptoms potently and simultaneously enhanced MC mediators, hinting at MCs as direct targets. In fact, FcεRI-mediated MC histamine release was synergistically increased by metoprolol/ramipril or metoprolol/bradykinin (the latter increased after ACE inhibitor intake), whereas the substances had no significant effect on their own. MC priming was particularly pronounced when FcεRI aggregation was in the suboptimal range, reflecting common clinical settings. CONCLUSION: ß-Blockers and ACE inhibitors synergistically aggravate anaphylaxis at least partly by decreasing the threshold of MC activation.

[Ramipril plus amlodipine and lisinopril plus amlodipine fixed dose combinations and patient's adherence]. / A ramipril/amlodipin és a lisinopril/amlodipin fix kombinációk a terápiahuség tükrében.

INTRODUCTION: Patient's adherence has a great significance to reach target blood pressure values. The risk of cardiovascular adverse events decreases when patients are on target blood pressure. AIM: The aim of the authors was to investigate the one-year persistence of the ramipril/amlodipine and lisinopril/amlodipine fixed dose combination in hypertensive patients. METHOD: National Health Insurance Found prescriptions database of Hungary on pharmacy-claims between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013 was analyzed. The authors identified patients who filled prescriptions for fixed dose combinations of ramipril and amlodipine, and lisinopril and amlodipine prescribed for the first time, for the therapeutic indication of hypertension. Patients have not received antihypertensive therapy with similar active substances during one year before the study. To model the persistence, the apparatus of survival analysis was used, where "survival" was the time to abandon the medication. As it was available to month precision, discrete time survival analysis was applied: a generalized linear model was estimated with complementary log-log link function with the kind of drug being the only explanatory variable. RESULTS: During the study period, fixed dose combination antihypertensive therapy with ramipril plus amlodipine and lisinopril plus amlodipine was started in 10,449 and 20,276 patients, respectively. One-year persistence rate in patients taking ramipril and amlodipine as a fixed dose combination was 54%, whereas 36% in those on the fixed lisinopril and amlodipine combination. Considering only the 360-day study period, the mean duration of persistence was 271 days in patients on the ramipril based and 211 days on lisinopril based fixed dose combination. Analyzing persistence on treatment with these combinations showed that the actual rate of discontinuation was about twice higher during treatment with the lisinopril and amlodipine fixed dose combination compared with the use of the ramipril and amlodipine fixed dose combination (hazard ratio = 1.79, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference between the one-year persistence of ramipril plus amlodipine and lisinopril plus amlodipine fixed dose combination in patients with hypertension. The result demonstrated that ramipril and amlodipine fixed dose combination has a favourable patients' adherence as compared to lisinopril and amlodipine fixed dose combination.

Association of the ADRB2 (rs2053044) polymorphism and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor blood pressure response in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension.

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease and is most prevalent in African-American adults. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is integral in blood pressure regulation; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors such as ramipril are first-line treatment options. As decreases in angiotensin result in catecholamine release, ß-adrenergic receptor (ADRB) polymorphisms may influence blood pressure response to ramipril. METHODS: Associations between ADRB polymorphisms and blood pressure response to ramipril were analyzed in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, a randomized clinical trial. A total of 336 participants were included in this analysis. Six polymorphisms were analyzed here: (a) ADRB1 rs1801252 (Ser49Gly) and rs1801253 (Gly389Arg); and (b) ADRB2 rs2053044, rs1042711, rs1042713 (Arg16Gly), and rs1042714 (Gln27Glu). Time to reach a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 107 mmHg within the first 60 days after randomization was studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling for univariate and adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Genotypes at rs2053044, upstream from the ADRB2 5' untranslated region, were associated with time to reach target MAP among those randomized to the usual treatment group. Participants with the GG genotype achieved target MAP on average 12.2 days (38.1%) later than in comparison with those with the A allele (P=0.01). After adjusting for covariates, those with the AA/AG genotype had 2.09 greater odds of reaching MAP of 107 mmHg or less within 60 days of treatment in comparison with those with a GG genotype (hazard ratio=2.09, 95% confidence interval=1.21-3.60). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that ADRB2 rs2053044 genotypes may be a determinant of blood pressure response to ramipril. Additional studies are needed to clarify the effect of rs2053044 and other 5' untranslated region polymorphisms on gene expression and blood pressure response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Single-pill combination therapy in the initial treatment of marked hypertension: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs combinations are available and equally recommended for the initial treatment of patients with marked blood pressure (BP) elevation and high cardiovascular risk. HYPOTHESIS: To investigate safety and efficacy of such combination therapies. METHODS: Prospectively collected data were retrospectively reviewed, inclusion criteria were: initial single-pill combination therapy, availability of clinical and echocardiographic 6-month follow-up. Six treatment groups were identified: Enalapril 20 mg+ Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (E/H), E 20 mg + Lercanidipine 10 mg (E/L), Ramipril 2.5 mg+ H 12.5 mg (R/H), Perindopril 5 mg+ Amlodipine 5 mg (P/A), Olmesartan 40 mg+ H 12.5 mg (O/H) and Telmisartan 40 mg+ H 12.5 mg (T/H). To avoid selection bias a Propensity score (goodness of fit: c-statistic 0.78, p = 0.0001) was used to select comparable cohorts of patients (n = 142 each). RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment BP goal was achieved by 624/852 (73.2%) patients, and adverse events were registered in 24/852 (2.8%) patients. After 6 months, 562/624 (90.1%) patients maintained the BP goal. Six-month responder rate was significantly higher in the E/L (69.0%) and P/A (68.3%) groups (p = 0.05); especially among diabetics (52.0% and 51.0%, respectively; p = 0.003). Patients receiving E/L (-19.8 ± 3.2 mmHg) and P/A (-19.9 ± 4.6 mmHg) showed greater reductions of diastolic BP (p = 0.03); whereas reductions of systolic BP were similar between treatment groups (p = 0.46). Echocardiographic follow-up revealed greater left ventricular reverse remodeling among patients receiving ACE-inhibitors (E/L, R/H, E/H and P/A), but this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Single-pill fixed-dose combination therapies are highly effective and safe in the study settings. Best clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were noted among patients receiving E/L, R/H and P/A.

[Medication adherence with the fixed combination of ramipril and amlodipine]. / A ramipril/amlodipin fix kombináció perzisztenciája.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate patient adherence has outstanding importance during the management of chronic disorders including hypertension. In particular, target blood pressure and reduction of cardiovascular risk can be reached only by prolonged, effective pharmacotherapy. Hypertension is known as one of the most significant cardiovascular risk factors. According to international data, antihypertensive therapy with a fixed combination improves patient adherence by about 20 per cent in comparison with free combinations. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the persistence on one-year treatment with the free or fixed combination of ramipril and amlodipine, administered for the indication of hypertension. METHOD: Information from the National Health Insurance Found prescriptions database, on pharmacy-claims between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013 was analyzed. The authors identified patients who filled prescriptions for fixed or free combinations of ramipril and amlodipine, prescribed for the first time, for the therapeutic indication of hypertension. The subjects have not received antihypertensive therapy with similar active substances during the year preceding the study. Using the Kaplan-Meier technique, the authors constructed persistence curves with a 95% confidence interval for point estimates calculated on a log scale. Patients who were still persistent at the closing date of the study were considered censored. For modeling of the curves, the authors used semi-parametric Cox's regression where antihypertensive therapy was the only (categorical) explanatory variable, and the patients taking the fixed combination were regarded as the reference group. RESULTS: During the study period, combination antihypertensive therapy with ramipril and amlodipine was started with a free or a fixed combination of these agents in 20,096 and 10,449 patients, respectively. One-year persistence rate in patients taking ramipril and amlodipine as a free combination was 34%, whereas 54% in those on the fixed combination. This 20 percent difference means that the rate of persistence was higher by 58.8/2%. Considering only the 360-day study period, the mean duration of persistence was 272 days in patients on the fixed, and 206 days in those taking the free combination. Analyzing persistence on treatment with these combinations showed that the actual rate of discontinuation was about twice higher during treatment with the free, compared with the use of the fixed combination (hazard ratio = 1.94, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study, which is unique even by international standards, demonstrated the clear benefit of initiating antihypertensive therapy with the fixed combination of ramipril and amlodipine over starting treatment with the free combination. In particular, the chance of discontinuation during a one-year treatment with the former was approximately half of that seen with the latter. Inadequately controlled hypertension is a significant cardiovascular risk factor. The markedly higher persistence of patients on therapy with the fixed combination of ramipril and amlodipine can lead to a reduction in cardiovascular risk, which might prove - on the longer term - a positive outcome of public health significance.