Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
Microvasc Res ; 122: 13-21, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Forearm cutaneous blood flux (CBF) measurement with post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) is uncomfortable and may not be devoid of risks. We aimed to investigate post-compression reactive hyperemia (PCRH) with a custom-made indenter that was designed to be easily used routinely by inexperienced observers. METHODS: Medical students evaluated PCRH with 1- to 4-min pressure applications of 16 to 34 kPa and PORH with 3-min forearm cuff occlusion using laser speckle contrast imaging in 15 healthy volunteers. Participants were asked to quantify their discomfort with a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 10 cm. Total ischemia (ISCH) was quantified by the product of CBF during ischemia and ischemia duration (min). We subtracted the CBF changes in the skin from a reference ipsilateral (PCRH) or contralateral (PORH) non-stimulated area. RESULTS: The average VAS was 1.0 for PCRH vs. 6.0 for PORH (p < 0.001). A strong linear relationship between ISCH and peak PCRH (r2 = 0.915, p < 0.001) was noted. Peak PORH values (63.9 laser perfusion units (LPU)) were significantly lower than all values of the 3-min PCRH (72.6 LPU), including the one obtained with 16 kPa. CONCLUSION: Inexperienced observers could test microvascular reactivity with PCRH without inducing the discomfort that is typically experienced with PORH. Further, PCRH elicits a higher peak response to ischemia compared with PORH. This extremely simple method could influence a broad spectrum of routine cutaneous microcirculation investigations, especially when a painful approach is particularly inadequate or if the patient is fragile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02861924.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/instrumentación , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Flujometría por Láser-Doppler , Microcirculación , Dolor/prevención & control , Piel/irrigación sanguínea , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Antebrazo , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Hiperemia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Presión , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudiantes de Medicina , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
2.
Echocardiography ; 34(9): 1324-1331, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28776763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microvascular coronary impairment, defined as reduced coronary flow reserve, represents the predominant etiologic mechanism of ischemia in women with chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a noninvasive method for assessing coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The purpose of this investigation was to define the safety profile, feasibility, adverse events, and rate of complications of the test in women with suspected CAD. METHODS: We evaluated CFVR in LAD with TTE during adenosine infusion in 1455 women aged 66.4±11.9 years. RESULTS: A complete CFVR study was achieved in 1429 pts (feasibility 98.2%), the test being performed also in the early phase of acute coronary syndrome and on obese patients. Minor symptoms or adverse effects occurred in 43.7% of patients not requiring test termination: hyperpnea (16.7%), flushing (9.4%), atypical chest pain (9.9%), headache (6.6%), minor arrhythmias (2.9%), chest pain with EKG changes (1.5%) were the symptoms reported. No major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive assessment of CFVR in LAD by TTE is a very feasible method with very low incidence of adverse events and complications in women with suspected or known CAD. It is safe and can be used when evaluating female patients with atherosclerotic LAD disease or with coronary microvascular impairment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Microcirculación/fisiología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Circ J ; 79(6): 1269-76, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25787229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality in hemodialysis patients. The aim was to assess the relationship of various invasive cardiovascular procedures (ICP) to clinical outcome in hemodialysis patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 5,813 patients at 76 facilities were on maintenance hemodialysis in Kumamoto Prefecture. Of these, 4,807 patients at 58 institutions were enrolled. Of 4,807 patients, 212 ICP (4.4%) were performed for various cardiovascular diseases in 189 patients (3.9%). ICP included PCI (n=80), endovascular treatment (n=59), radiofrequency catheter ablation (n=8), implantation of permanent pacemaker (n=15) and ICD (n=5), thoracotomy for valvular diseases (n=16), CABG (n=14), bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease (PAD; n=8), and artificial vessel replacement for aneurysm or aortic dissection (n=7). The overall mortality rate was 10.1% (19/189 patients). The mortality rate was highest in patients who underwent ICP for PAD, compared with other ICP (PAD, 18.2%; non-PAD, 6.7%, P=0.017). Infection and PAD were significant predictors of mortality (infection: OR, 8.30; 95% CI: 1.29-65.13, P=0.027; PAD: OR, 3.76; 95% CI: 1.35-10.48, P=0.012). The presence of inflammation/malnutrition factors was associated with high mortality (OR, 15.49; 95% CI: 3.22-74.12, P=0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based registry study of 4,807 hemodialysis patients, the mortality rate of PAD patients was high despite ICP.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/estadística & datos numéricos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Desfibriladores Implantables , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/mortalidad , Inflamación/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Revascularización Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Marcapaso Artificial , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Europace ; 13(5): 683-8, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21252192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The utility of defibrillation threshold testing in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is controversial. Higher defibrillation thresholds have been noted in patients undergoing implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Since the risks and potential benefits of testing may be higher in this population, we sought to assess the impact of defibrillation safety margin or vulnerability safety margin testing in CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 256 consecutive subjects who underwent CRT-D implantation between January 2003 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups based on whether (n= 204) or not (n= 52) safety margin testing was performed. Patient characteristics, tachyarrhythmia therapies, procedural results, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Baseline characteristics, including heart failure (HF) severity, were comparable between the groups. Four cases of HF exacerbation (2%), including one leading to one death, were recorded in the tested group immediately post-implantation. No complications were observed in the untested group. After a mean follow-up of 32 ± 20 months, the proportion of appropriate shocks in the two groups was similar (31 vs. 25%, P = 0.49). There were three cases of failed appropriate shocks in the tested group, despite adequate safety margins at implantation, whereas no failed shocks were noted in the untested group. Survival was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Defibrillation efficacy testing during implant of CRT-D was associated with increased morbidity and did not predict the success of future device therapy or improve survival during long-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Ventricular , Anciano , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/estadística & datos numéricos , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Ventricular/epidemiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
7.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(14): 1813-1822, 2021 04 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832607

RESUMEN

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in pregnancy, both diagnosed and previously unknown, is rising, and CVD is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Historically, women of child-bearing potential have been underrepresented in research, leading to lasting knowledge gaps in the cardiovascular care of pregnant and lactating women. Despite these limitations, clinicians should be familiar with the safety of frequently used diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to adequately care for this at-risk population. This review, the fourth of a 5-part series, provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of common cardiovascular diagnostic tests and medications in pregnant and lactating women.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/clasificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/clasificación , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos
9.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther ; 35(4): 321-326, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31641953

RESUMEN

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) testing has become popular in the world as a spasm provocation test as well as an ergonovine test. Intracoronary ACh test based on the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines is necessary to insert a temporary pace maker (PM). We analyzed the ACh spasm provocation test procedures retrospectively. We performed 1829 ACh spasm provocation testing during 28 years. We investigated the procedural approach sites of artery and vein. Femoral artery and vein approach, brachial artery and femoral vein approach, brachial artery and vein approach, radial artery and brachial vein approach, radial artery and femoral vein approach were performed in 292 patients (16.0%), 498 patients (27.2%), 589 patients (32.2%), 252 patients (13.8%), and 175 patients (9.6%), respectively. We could perform the ACh testing by the femoral artery and brachial artery in all patients, while the success rate of radial artery approach was 97.1%. We could also insert the temporary PM by the brachial vein in 94.8% (841/887) of the study patients, whereas we could insert the temporary PM in all femoral vein approach [100% (965/965)]. We experienced the pulmonary embolism by the femoral artery and vein approach in two patients, while we also had the arterio-venous fistula necessary for surgical repair in two patients by the brachial artery and vein approach. Although there was no difference about the procedure-related major complications among the various procedures, we had no pulmonary embolism or arterio-venous fistula by the radial artery and brachial vein approach. Considering the disinfection with povidone iodine, procedural performance or procedure-related complications by the ACh testing, we recommend that radial artery and brachial vein approach is more comfortable method of the future ACh testing not only for patients but also for operators.


Asunto(s)
Acetilcolina/administración & dosificación , Vasoespasmo Coronario/diagnóstico , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación , Acetilcolina/efectos adversos , Acetilcolina/farmacología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria , Vasoespasmo Coronario/inducido químicamente , Vasos Coronarios/efectos de los fármacos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Ergonovina/administración & dosificación , Ergonovina/efectos adversos , Ergonovina/farmacología , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasoconstrictores/efectos adversos , Vasoconstrictores/farmacología
10.
Heart ; 105(10): 761-767, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30636219

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Transition towards value-based healthcare requires insight into what makes value to the individual. The aim was to elicit individual preferences for cardiovascular disease screening with respect to the difficult balancing of good and harm as well as mode of delivery. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted as a cross-sectional survey among 1231 male screening participants at three Danish hospitals between June and December 2017. Participants chose between hypothetical screening programmes characterised by varying levels of mortality risk reduction, avoidance of overtreatment, avoidance of regretting participation, screening duration and location. A multinomial mixed logit model was used to model the preferences and the willingness to trade mortality risk reduction for improvements on other characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents expressed preferences for improvements on all programme characteristics. They were willing to give up 0.09 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.09) lives saved per 1000 screened to avoid one individual being over treated. Similarly, respondents were willing to give up 1.22 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.55) or 5.21 (95% CI 4.78 to 5.67) lives saved per 1000 screened to upgrade the location from general practice to a hospital or to a high-tech hospital, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed important preference heterogeneity with respect to smoking status, level of health literacy and self-perceived risk of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals are able to express clear preferences about what makes value to them. Not only health benefit but also time with health professionals and access to specialised facilities were important. This information could guide the optimal programme design in search of value-based healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Conducta de Elección , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular , Prioridad del Paciente , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor/economía
11.
Can J Cardiol ; 34(4): 400-412, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571424

RESUMEN

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is an important and previously underappreciated cause of significant morbidity and mortality in women. Key differences exist in the pathophysiology, sex-specific risk factors, and clinical presentation in women compared with men, which influence diagnostic accuracy and utility of pretest risk assessments and noninvasive testing. Women are disproportionately affected by ischemia from microvascular dysfunction as evidenced by having less obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography, contributing to the challenge in diagnosis and prognosis of IHD in women via conventional methods, which tend to emphasize detection of epicardial stenoses. In this article, we review the utility, evidence for, and challenges of currently available risk assessments and noninvasive cardiac diagnostic tests in women. We propose an approach to investigation of the symptomatic woman with suspected IHD and selection of the appropriate testing modality. Finally, we explore opportunities for future research and highlight the urgent need for updated, evidence-based, Canadian guidelines specific to women with IHD.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Pronóstico , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
12.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0168726, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28151965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring intravascular iodinated contrast steadily increase patient exposure to the risks of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI), which is associated with death, nonfatal cardiovascular events, and prolonged hospitalization. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for CIAKI prevention in patients undergoing cardiovascular invasive procedures with iodinated contrast. METHODS AND FINDINGS: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular and nephrology meetings were searched, up to 22 April 2016. Eligible studies were randomized trials comparing strategies to prevent CIAKI (alone or in combination) when added to saline versus each other, saline, placebo, or no treatment in patients undergoing cardiovascular invasive procedures with administration of iodinated contrast. Two reviewers independently extracted trial-level data including number of patients, duration of follow-up, and outcomes. Eighteen strategies aimed at CIAKI prevention were identified. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CIAKI. Secondary outcomes were mortality, myocardial infarction, dialysis and heart failure. The data were pooled using network meta-analysis. Treatment estimates were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). 147 RCTs involving 33,463 patients were eligible. Saline plus N-acetylcysteine (OR 0.72, 95%CrI 0.57-0.88), ascorbic acid (0.59, 0.34-0.95), sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine (0.59, 0.36-0.89), probucol (0.42, 0.15-0.91), methylxanthines (0.39, 0.20-0.66), statin (0.36, 0.21-0.59), device-guided matched hydration (0.35, 0.12-0.79), prostaglandins (0.26, 0.08-0.62) and trimetazidine (0.26, 0.09-0.59) were associated with lower odds of CIAKI compared to saline. Methylxanthines (0.12, 0.01-0.94) or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided hydration (0.09, 0.01-0.59) were associated with lower mortality compared to saline. CONCLUSIONS: Currently recommended treatment with saline as the only measure to prevent CIAKI during cardiovascular procedures may not represent the optimal strategy. Vasodilators, when added to saline, may significantly reduce the odds of CIAKI following cardiovascular procedures.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/fisiopatología , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Metaanálisis en Red , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación
13.
Recenti Prog Med ; 97(11): 652-62, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17252723

RESUMEN

Every year, 5 billion imaging testing are performed worldwide, and about 1 out of 2 are cardiovascular examinations. According to recent estimates, 30 to 50% of all examinations are partially or totally inappropriate. This represents a potential damage for patient undergoing imaging (who takes the acute risks of a stress procedure and/or a contrast study without a commensurable benefit), an exorbitant cost for the society and an excessive delay in the waiting lists for other patients needing the examination. Economic induction, medico-legal concern, and specialist guidelines, which do not quantitate the potential benefits against the risks of a given procedure, boost inappropriateness of all imaging techniques. In case of ionizing tests, the reduction of useless imaging testing would improve the quality of care also through abatement of long-term risks, which are linked to the dose employed. The radiation dose equivalent of common cardiological imaging examinations corresponds to more than 1000 chest x rays for a thallium scan and to more than 500 chest x-rays for a multislice computed tomography. Although a direct evaluation of incidence of cancer in patients submitted to these procedures is not available, the estimated risk (often ignored by cardiologists) of cancer according to the latest 2005 Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Committee VII is about one in 500 exposed patients for a Thallium scintigraphy scan, and one in 750 for a CT scan. Such a risk is probably not acceptable when a scintigraphic or radiological procedure is applied for mass screening (when the risk side of the risk-benefit balance is not considered) or when a similar information can be obtained by other means. By contrast, it is fully acceptable in appropriately selected groups as a filter to more invasive, risky and costly procedures (for instance, coronary angiography and anatomy-driven revascularization). At this point, the cardiological community, that faces the reality of limited resources, should do every effort in order to minimize inappropriate testing, since they induce an exorbitant increase in health care costs with no improvement, and possibly with a reduction in care quality.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Radiografía/efectos adversos , Cintigrafía/efectos adversos , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Cardiología/tendencias , Diagnóstico por Imagen/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Humanos , Responsabilidad Legal , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/efectos adversos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Traumatismos por Radiación/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Talio/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos
14.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 6(2): 147-53, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11509921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a frequently overlooked clinical entity that can cause progressive renal failure and uncontrolled hypertension. Revascularization of a stenosed renal artery is associated with improved clinical outcomes including the prevention of renal failure. Thus, it is important to recognize all potential candidates for renal artery revascularization. In a general population referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization, RAS of any severity was found in 30% of patients and significant stenosis (> or = 50% diameter narrowing) was found in 15% of patients. The number of minority groups is increasing in the US population, and RAS in this population is not well investigated. Our purpose was to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with RAS in minority patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. METHODS: Abdominal aortography was performed in 171 consecutive minority patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization (hispanics = 115, African Americans = 56). The association of clinical and angiographic variables with RAS was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Renal artery stenosis of any severity was identified in 13.5% of patients (unilateral 7.7%, bilateral 5.8%). Significant RAS was found in 7.7% of patients (unilateral 4.8%, bilateral 2.9%). Independent predictors of RAS included age (mean +/-1SD, 68 +/-10 vs 57 +/-12 yr, P < 0.001, for patients with vs without RAS), coronary artery disease, and elevated serum creatinine levels (> 115 micromol/L). Race/ethnicity (hispanics vs African Americans), sex, smoking, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension were not independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenosis in minority patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization is less common than reported in white patients, is similar in hispanics and African Americans, and is similar in women and men. The clinical and angiographic features are helpful in predicting its presence.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/etiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/epidemiología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/etnología , Factores de Riesgo , Caracteres Sexuales
15.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 11(7): 439-43, 1999 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10745569

RESUMEN

We report successful local thrombolysis to treat intracranial ischemic complications of angioplasty with stenting of a high-grade carotid artery stenosis, angioplasty with thrombolysis of an occluded venous graft, and routine coronary angiography. Intracranial complications occurring during cardiovascular diagnostic or interventional procedures can be reversed with prompt management via rescue thrombolysis. These events should not be viewed as irreversible complications, and the opportunity for intracranial thrombolysis should be available wherever cardiovascular interventional procedures are performed. The ability to quickly recognize and remedy complications occurring during these procedures is another step in the continued advancement of neuroendovascular therapy.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Stents/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia/etiología , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/terapia
16.
Rozhl Chir ; 82(4): 214-21, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Cs | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12795236

RESUMEN

With advancing care of patients with cardiovascular diseases the number of invasive cardiological operations is increasing. Although effective methods are involved, these procedures are also associated with certain risks for the patient. From the aspect of vascular surgery the most frequent complications include iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms and extensive haematomas. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the development of the number of pseudoaneurysms which occurred after puncture of the femoral artery during coronarography or PTCA, and verification of the hypothesis of the declining trend of the ratio of pseudoaneurysms in the total number of performed invasive cardiological diagnostic and therapeutic operations. The author submits in his paper the retrospectively assessed number of invasive operations performed at the 1st Medical Cardioangiological Clinic of the St. Ann Faculty Hospital Brno in 1996-2001. It summarizes the number of PA dealt with during the same period by physicians of the 2nd Surgical Clinic of the St. Ann Hospital in Brno. It analyzes also the treated complications of cardiological operations in 2001.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Arterias/lesiones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Anciano , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Falso/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 15(7): 736-46, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the role of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery (BA) and peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) in predicting adverse events, including cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND: FMD of the BA and PAT are non-invasive measures of endothelial function. Impairment of endothelial function is associated with increased CV events. While FMD is the more widely used and studied technique, PAT offers several advantages. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether brachial FMD and PAT are independent risk factors for future CV events and mortality. METHODS: Multiple electronic databases were searched for articles relating FMD or PAT to CV events. Data were extracted on study characteristics, study quality, and study outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) from individual studies were combined and a pooled multivariate RR was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies for FMD were included in the systematic review, of which 32 studies consisting of 15, 191 individuals were meta-analysed. The pooled RR of CV events and all-cause mortality per 1% increase in brachial FMD, adjusting for potential confounders, was 0.90 (0.88-0.92). In contrast, only three studies evaluated the prognostic value of PAT for CV events, and the pooled RR per 0.1 increase in reactive hyperaemia index was 0.85 (0.78-0.93). CONCLUSION: Brachial FMD and PAT are independent predictors of CV events and all-cause mortality. Further research to evaluate the prognostic utility of PAT is necessary to compare it with FMD as a non-invasive endothelial function test in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología , Vasodilatación/fisiología
19.
Cardiol Clin ; 32(2): 211-24, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24793798

RESUMEN

With advancements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology, the practice of performing defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at the time of implantation has been questioned. With availability of biphasic waveforms, active cans, and high-output devices, opponents claim that DFT testing is no longer necessary. Clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of ICDs in prevention of sudden cardiac death have, however, all used some form of defibrillation testing. This debate is fueled by the absence of data from randomized prospective trials evaluating the role of DFT testing in predicting clinical shock efficacy or survival. This review discusses both sides of the argument.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/economía , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Falla de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Innecesarios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Fibrilación Ventricular/economía , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
20.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 15(4): 253-63, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24873815

RESUMEN

In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step.Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/economía , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Ahorro de Costo , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Diagnóstico por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/economía , Técnicas de Genotipaje/economía , Técnicas de Genotipaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención Primaria , Radiografía/efectos adversos , Radiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención Secundaria , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA