Pancreas transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To define recent changes and future directions in the practice of pancreas transplantation (PT). Two major events have occurred in the past 18 months: COVID-19 pandemic, and the first world consensus conference on PT. Several innovative studies were published after the consensus conference. RECENT FINDINGS: During COVID-19 pandemic PT activity decreased. COVID-19 in transplant recipients increases mortality rates, but data from kidney transplantation show that mortality might be higher in waitlisted patients.The world consensus conference provided 49 jury deliberations on the impact of PT on management of diabetic patients and 110 practice recommendations.Recent evidence demonstrates that PT alone is safe and effective, that results of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) remain excellent despite older recipient age and higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes, that use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors into HCV-negative recipients is associated with good outcomes, and that use of sirolimus as primary immunosuppressant and costimulation blockade does not improve results of SPK. SUMMARY: COVID-19 pandemic and the first world consensus conference on PT were major events. Although COVID-19 pandemic should not reduce PT activity in the future, a major positive impact on both volume and outcomes of PT is awaited from the proceedings of the world consensus conference.

Effects of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and kidney transplantation alone on the outcome of peripheral vascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: The effects of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation (SPKT) on Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) warrants additional study and more target focus, since little is known about the mid- and long-term effects on the progression of PVD after transplantation. METHODS: 101 SPKT and 26 Kidney Transplantation Alone (KTA) recipients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were retrospectively evaluated with regard to graft and metabolic outcome. Special subgroup analysis was directed towards the development and progression of peripheral vascular complications (PVC) (amputation, ischemic ulceration, lower extremity angioplasty/ bypass surgery) after transplantation. RESULTS: The 10-year patient survival was significantly higher in the SPKT group (SPKT: 82% versus KTA 40%; P < 0.001). KTA recipients had a higher prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors, including coronary artery disease (P < 0.001), higher serum triglyceride levels (P = 0.049), higher systolic (P = 0.03) and diastolic (P = 0.02) blood pressure levels. The incidence of PVD before transplantation was comparable between both groups (P = 0.114). Risk factor adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that patients with SPKT had a significant lower amount (32%) of PVCs (32 PVCs in 21 out of 101 SPKT; P < 0.001) when compared to the KTA patients who developed a significant increase in PVCs to 69% of cases (18 PVCs in 11 out of 26 KTA; P < 0.001). In line mean values of HbA1c (P < 0.01) and serum triglycerides (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients with SPKT > 8 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: SPKT favorably slows down development and progression of PVD by maintaining a superior metabolic vascular risk profile in patients with IDDM1.

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in kidney and simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant recipients in the present era of routine post-transplant prophylaxis: risk factors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to identify predictors for development of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in kidney and simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant recipients in the present era of universal primary prophylaxis. METHODS: We reviewed adult recipients of kidney transplant or simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant at the University of Wisconsin between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2016. Patients diagnosed with PJP during this time frame were included. Controls were randomly selected from among those whose post-transplant course was not complicated by PJP, matched on time since transplant through incidence density sampling with a 3:1 ratio. RESULTS: 28 (0.45%) of 6270 recipients developed PJP between 1994 and 2016. Median time since transplant was 4.6 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.4-9.6 years). Affected recipients were older, had more HLA mismatches, and were more likely to have had BK viremia, CMV viremia and invasive fungal infections than matched controls. CMV viremia remained the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis, and was a strong predictor (OR 6.27; p = 0.002). Ninety percent of the cases with prior CMV viremia had been diagnosed in the year preceding the diagnosis of PJP; among these, median time from diagnosis of CMV to diagnosis of PJP was 3.4 months (IQR: 1.74-11.5 months) and median peak CMV viral load prior to diagnosis of PJP was 3684.5 IU/mL (IQR: 1034-93,300 IU/mL). Additionally, 88.9% of patients with CMV in the preceding year had active infection at time of PJP diagnosis. Patient and graft survival were significantly worse at 2 years in recipients with PJP than our control group (42.4% vs. 88.5, and 37.9% vs. 79.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low overall incidence of PJP in the era of universal prophylaxis, outcomes are poor. We suggest extending or re-initiating PJP prophylaxis for at least 6 months in the setting of CMV viremia due to the relatively low risk of therapy and potential significant impact on disease prevention.

[Machine perfusion: new opportunities in abdominal organ transplantation]. / Szervkonzerválás gépi perfúzióval: új lehetoségek a hasi szervek transzplantációjában.

Machine perfusion of marginal grafts might be a possible solution to organ shortage and a promising tool for reducing waiting list morbidity and mortality. In recent years, optimizing the circumstances of organ preservation prior to implantation via machine perfusion has become a hot topic of research. Machine perfusion offers a platform for organ reconditioning, assessment of cell viability and function, pharmacological preconditioning, prolongation of preservation time (ischemia time) and finally reducing graft injury. The objective of the new technology is to increase the pool of transplantable organs safely. Multicentric prospective studies have been evaluating the short and long term outcomes of different methods, however, several questions still remain unanswered. This review summarizes the recent advances in the field of machine perfusion, focusing on preclinical and clinical results. Machine perfusion seems to be a new milestone in the modern era of solid organ transplantation. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(46): 1882-1890.

[The first five years of Hungary's Eurotransplant membership]. / Az Eurotransplant-csatlakozás elso öt éve Magyarországon.

The author concludes lessons learned from Hungary joining Eurotransplant five years ago through the more than half a century history of the Hungarian organ transplantation. The result of the stepwise evolution is that today's transplantation activity can be measured by a European benchmark. In comparison to the era before the membership, there are 40% more transplantations in the country. First the numbers of the living donor kidney transplantations significantly raised, followed by the organs transplanted from brain-dead donors: kidney, heart, pancreas, then liver and finally also lung. The ratio of the multiorgan donors changed from about 40% to more than 70%. A reassuring solution was found for the high urgent cases, for the paediatric transplants and for the highly immunized patients, who would have been in a desperate situation without Eurotransplant, but now every Hungarian end-stage organ failure patient has similar chances for getting a potential life-saving organ as their former luckier West-European counterparts. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(42): 1695-1699.

Controversies in pancreas transplantation.

Pancreas transplants are now highly effective for patients with diabetes mellitus. Improvements in outcomes have primarily been due to significant reductions in technical failures and immunological graft loss. In this short review we discuss three areas of controversy in the field of pancreas transplantation. Notwithstanding the controversies we have highlighted, in line with the American Diabetic Association position statement, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants and pancreas after kidney transplants should be routine for diabetic kidney recipients, and a pancreas transplant alone is appropriate for non-uremic labile diabetic patients.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: current trends and future directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Important trends are being observed in pancreas transplantation in the USA. We will describe recent trends in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation related to immunosuppression, treatment of rejection, and transplantation for patients of advanced age and C-peptide positive diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: Rates of pancreas transplantation have declined, despite improved pancreatic graft outcomes. Regarding immunosuppression, trends in SPK transplantation include T-cell depletion induction therapy, waning mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use and steroid use in greater than 50% of pancreas transplant recipients with few patients undergoing late steroid weaning. Rejection of the pancreas may be discordant with the kidney after SPK and there is a greater appreciation of antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft. De-novo donor-specific antibody without graft dysfunction remains an active area of study, and the treatment for this condition is unclear. SPKs are being performed with greater frequency in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and in patients of advanced age, with exemplary results. SUMMARY: The current state of the art in SPK transplantation is yielding superb and improving results.

The allocation of pancreas allografts on donor age and duration of intensive care unit stay: the experience of the North Italy Transplant program.

Starting in 2011, the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) has based on the allocation of pancreas allografts on donor age and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, but not on donor weight or BMI. We analyzed the detailed allocation protocols of all NITp pancreas donors (2011-2012; n = 433). Outcome measures included donor characteristics and pancreas loss reasons during the allocation process. Twenty-three percent of the 433 pancreases offered for allocation were transplanted. Younger age, shorter ICU stay, traumatic brain death, and higher eGFR were predictors of pancreas transplant, either as vascularized organ or as islets. Among pancreas allografts offered to vascularized organ programs, 35% were indeed transplanted, and younger donor age was the only predictor of transplant. The most common reasons for pancreas withdrawal from the allocation process were donor-related factors. Among pancreas offered to islet programs, 48% were processed, but only 14.2% were indeed transplanted, with unsuccessful isolation being the most common reason for pancreas loss. Younger donor age and higher BMI were predictors of islet allograft transplant. The current allocation strategy has allowed an equal distribution of pancreas allografts between programs for either vascularized organ or islet transplant. The high rate of discarded organs remained an unresolved issue.

Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation.

Background: The field of pancreas transplantation has undergone transformative phases, progressing from its promising inception in 1966 to becoming a standard treatment for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. This bibliometric analysis explores the progression of pancreas transplantation research over a period of four decades, mapping milestones, contributors, and emerging trends. Methods: Our bibliometric analysis utilizes the comprehensive Scopus database, which includes publication titles, author information, affiliations, abstracts, keywords, and journal details. The search strategy was centered on research related to pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation. The analysis encompasses the time frame spanning from 1983 to 2023, with the data extraction taking place on October 7th, 2023. Results: The analysis of 4,897 articles uncovered unique trends in the field of pancreas transplantation research. The years 1989, 1996, and 2021 saw significant increases in the number of publications, which corresponded to the responses to clinical challenges and advancements. Contributions by authors from the United States of America were the most numerous, with 1,905 publications and 49,949 citations. The research topics were highlighted by keywords such as "graft survival," "graft rejection," and" Immunosuppressive treatment." Conclusion: The fluctuations in publication trends that have been identified indicate dynamic reactions to changing priorities and challenges. Although it has limitations, this analysis provides valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers who are dealing with the complex field of pancreas transplantation literature. Further bibliometric research may advance our knowledge and direct future initiatives in this developing field.

Emerging immune therapies in type 1 diabetes and pancreatic islet transplantation.

In type 1 diabetes (T1D) the immune system attacks insulin-producing pancreatic ß-cells. Unfortunately, our ability to curb this pathogenic autoimmune response in a disease- and organ-specific manner is still very limited due to the inchoate understanding of the exact nature and the kinetics of the immunological pathomechanisms that lead to T1D. None of the clinical immune interventions thus far, which focused primarily on new-onset disease, were successful in producing lasting remission or curbing recurrent autoimmunity. However, these studies do provide us access to a tremendous amount of clinical data and specimens, which will aid us in revising our therapeutical approaches and defining the highly needed paradigm shift in T1D immunotherapy. Analysing the foundation and the results of the most current T1D immunotherapeutic trials, this article gives an outlook for future directions of the field.

[Milestone in Hungarian organ transplantation: joining Eurotransplant]. / Mérföldko a magyar szervátültetésben: csatlakozás az Eurotransplanthoz.

Hungarian organ transplantation reached a new milestone after half-a-century history, when becoming a full member of the 135-million Eurotransplant community this year. The transplantation of the five organs: kidney, liver, pancreas, heart and lung became a routine procedure. A handful of specialists performed nearly 7000 transplantations and doing so supported the evolution of a special branch of the Hungarian health care system. The author reports the latest results of the preliminary membership year, looking forward with great optimism by seeing new horizons with the advantages of the full membership.

[Role of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the treatment of diabetes mellitus]. / Szimultán hasnyálmirigy-vese transzplantáció helye a diabetes mellitus kezelésében.

The life expectancy of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus is inferior to that of patients with some malignancies. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the procedure providing the best survival results among all options of renal replacement therapy. The operative techniques and immunosuppresion have been standardized in the last decade. Although the number of transplantable organs falls behind the need, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the method of choice for the eligible patients. The results of the two Hungarian simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation programs are in accordance with data published in the international literature.

Current state of combined kidney and pancreas transplantation.

Glycemic control via the use of exogenous insulin injections in diabetic patients is incomplete, resulting in multiple long-term complications, such as retinopathy, neuropathy, vasculopathy, and nephropathy. The goal of whole-pancreas and kidney transplantation is to achieve long-term insulin independence and correct uremia. The proposed benefits of pancreas and kidney transplantation are improved quality of life, prevention of recurrent diabetic nephropathy, freedom from exogenous insulin, stabilization or improvement in secondary complications, and improved mortality. No other regimen of insulin delivery or renal replacement besides pancreas and kidney transplantation can achieve this level of physiologic regulation.

Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008: the changing face of living donation.

The waiting list for kidney transplantation continued to grow between 1999 and 2008, from 41 177 to 76 089 candidates. However, active candidates represented the minority of this increase (36 951-50 624, a 37% change), while inactive candidates increased over 500% (4226-25 465). There were 5966 living donor (LD) and 10 551 deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants performed in 2008. The total number of pancreas transplants peaked at 1484 in 2004 and has declined to 1273. Although the number of LD transplants increased by 26% from 1999 to 2008, the total number peaked in 2004 at 6647 before declining 10% by 2008. The rate of LD transplantation continues to vary significantly as a function of demographic and geographic factors, including waiting time for DD transplant. Posttransplant survival remains excellent, and there appears to be greater use of induction agents and reduced use of corticosteroids in LD recipients. Significant changes occurred in the pediatric population, with a dramatic reduction in the use of LD organs after passage of the Share 35 rule. Many strategies have been adopted to reverse the decline in LD transplant rates for all age groups, including expansion of kidney paired donation, adoption of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and use of incompatible LD.

Pancreas transplantation.

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future.

The pancreas allograft is a scarce resource that is currently underutilized. The selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas procurement is of paramount importance for minimizing technical failure and optimizing long-term outcomes in pancreas transplantation. Despite the increasing demand for pancreas transplantation, increases in overall organ donation rates and the evolution of criteria that constitute an "acceptable" pancreas donor, the number of deceased donor pancreas transplants being performed in the United States has actually declined in recent years. Although there are many factors that must be considered during evaluation of the potential pancreas allograft donor to minimize morbidity and graft loss, it is evident that there are transplantable organs that are not used. In this review, deceased donor pancreas identification, management, selection, allocation, assessment, preservation, and the problem of pancreas underutilization will be discussed.

Pancreas vs. islet transplantation: a call on the future.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review recent reports on whole pancreas and islet cell transplantation. It focuses on 'what the call to the future looks like' for both therapies as treatment options for those type 1 diabetes patients who do not respond well to conventional therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The major benefit of pancreas transplantation is the reversal of diabetes improvement of diabetes complications. Although the procedure requires major surgery and life-long immunosuppression, it remains the gold standard for a specific population of patients who suffer from type 1 diabetes and who do not respond to conventional therapy. Allogeneic islet transplantation is a promising alternative to pancreas transplantation, but patient outcomes remain less than optimal and significant progress is required in order for this procedure to be considered a reliable therapy. CONCLUSION: Several factors have to be taken into consideration before making the decision of which of these procedures would better suit a patient with type 1 diabetes.

[Current situation of pancreas transplantation in Japan].

Pancreas transplantation has been recognized as the best treatment for advanced type 1 diabetic patients. In Japan, we have performed 64 SPK, PAK or PTA from 62 brain-dead donors and two non-heart beating donors since the enforcement of Organ Transplant Act in 1997. In addition, 18 cases have been performed from living related donors. The patient survival, pancreas graft survival and kidney graft survival rate of the cadaveric transplantation at five years are 97.5%, 73.9% and 71.0%, respectively. The QOL of the recipients in both mental and physical aspects has been wonderfully improved leading to the happy second life. In front of the revised low in this year, the number of the donor and the transplantation are expected to increase.