Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 185
Filtrar
1.
Bull World Health Organ ; 98(5): 341-352, 2020 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32514199

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness analyses of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed®, Scopus, EMBASE®, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies published before May 2019. Inclusion criteria were: (i) an original cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency care intervention or intervention package, and (ii) the analysis occurred in a low- and middle-income setting. To identify additional primary studies, we hand searched the reference lists of included studies. We used the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards guideline to appraise the quality of included studies. RESULTS: Of the 1674 articles we identified, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified an additional four studies from the reference lists. We excluded many studies for being deemed costing assessments without an effectiveness analysis. Most included studies were single-intervention analyses. Emergency care interventions evaluated by included studies covered prehospital services, provider training, treatment interventions, emergency diagnostic tools and facilities and packages of care. The reporting quality of the studies varied. CONCLUSION: We found large gaps in the evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income settings. Given the breadth of interventions currently in practice, many interventions remain unassessed, suggesting the need for future research to aid resource allocation decisions. In particular, packages of multiple interventions and system-level changes represent a priority area for future research.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Renta
2.
J Surg Res ; 256: 397-403, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32777556

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several composite measures of neighborhood social vulnerability exist and are used in the health disparity literature. This study assesses the performance of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) compared with three similar measures used in the surgical literature: Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Community Needs Index (CNI), and Distressed Communities Index (DCI). There are advantages of the SVI over these other scales, and we hypothesize that it performs equivalently. METHODS: We identified all cholecystectomies at a single, urban, academic hospital over a 9-month period. Cases were considered emergency if the patient presented and underwent surgery during that admission. We geocoded patient's addresses and assigned estimated SVI, ADI, CNI, and DCI. Cutoffs for high versus low social vulnerability were generated using Youden's index, and the scales were compared using multivariable modeling. RESULTS: Overall, 366 patients met inclusion criteria, and the majority (n = 266, 73%) had surgery in the emergency setting. On multivariable modeling, patients with high social vulnerability were more likely to undergo emergency surgery compared with those with low social vulnerability in accordance with all four scales: SVI (OR 3.24, P < 0.001), ADI (OR 3.2, P < 0.001), CNI (OR 1.90, P = 0.04), and DCI (OR 2.01, P = 0.03). The scales all had comparable predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The SVI performs similarly to other indices of neighborhood vulnerability in demonstrating disparities between emergency and elective surgery and is readily available and updated. Because the SVI has multiple subcategories in addition to the overall measure, it can be used to stratify by modifiable factors such as housing or transportation to inform interventions.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Colecistectomía/economía , Colecistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 76(4): 454-458, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32461010

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Single-payer health care is supported by most Americans, but the effect of single payer on any particular sector of the health care market has not been well explored. We examine the effect of 2 potential single-payer designs, Medicare for All and an alternative including Medicare and Medicaid, on total payments and out-of-pocket spending for treat-and-release emergency care (patients discharged after an emergency department [ED] visit). METHODS: We used the 2013 to 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to determine estimates of payments made for ED visits by insurance type, and the 2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to estimate the proportion of ED visits covered by each insurance type. RESULTS: We found that total payments were predicted to increase from $85.5 billion to $89.0 billion (range $81.3 to $99.8 billion) in the Medicare-only scenario and decrease to $79.4 billion (range $71.6 to $87.2 billion) under Medicare/Medicaid, whereas out-of-pocket costs were predicted to decrease from $116 per visit to $45 with Medicare and to $36 with Medicare/Medicaid. CONCLUSION: In this study of ED treat-and-release patients, a transition to a Medicare for All system may increase ED reimbursement and reduce consumer out-of-pocket costs, whereas a system that maintains Medicaid in addition to Medicare could reduce total payments for emergency care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Medicare/tendencias , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendencias , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos
4.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 41(2): 237-240, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705178

RESUMEN

Single ventricle congenital heart disease (SV CHD) patients are at risk of morbidity and mortality between the first and second palliative surgical procedures (interstage). When these patients present acutely they often require invasive intervention. This study sought to compare the outcomes and costs of elective and emergent invasive cardiac procedures for interstage patients. Retrospective review of discharge data from The Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager™, a national health care analytics platform. The database was queried for admissions from 10/2014 to 12/2017 for children 1-6 months old with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for SV CHD who underwent invasive cardiac procedures. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), complication rate, in-hospital mortality and direct costs were compared between elective and emergent admissions using t test or χ2, as appropriate. The three most frequently performed procedures were also compared. 871 admissions identified, with 141 (16%) emergent. Age of emergent admission was younger than elective (2.9 vs. 4 months p < 0.001). Emergent admissions including cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis had longer LOS (58.7 vs. 25.8 day, p < 0.001 and 54.8 vs .22.6 days, p < 0.001) and higher costs ($134,774 vs. $84,253, p = 0.013 and $158,679 vs. $81,899, p = 0.017). Emergent admissions for interstage SV CHD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis are associated with longer LOS and higher direct costs, but with no differences in complications or mortality. These findings support aggressive interstage monitoring to minimize the need for emergent interventions for this fragile patient population.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Corazón Univentricular/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Corazón Univentricular/mortalidad
5.
J Surg Res ; 234: 60-64, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527500

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent articles have suggested regionalization of some emergency general surgery (EGS) problems to tertiary referral centers. We sought to characterize the clinical and cost burden of such transfers to our tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for nine EGS diagnoses for patients admitted to the EGS service during calendar years 2015 and 2016. Patients were grouped as inpatient transfers (IPTs), Emergency Department transfers (EDTs), or local admissions (LAs). Demographic data, length of stay at originating site, insurance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and all relevant financial data were obtained. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-three patients were reviewed: 93 IPTs, 343 EDTs, and 227 LAs. IPTs required longer lengths of stay (7.0 d compared to 4.0 d for EDTs and 3.0 d for LAs), higher median direct costs, and higher case mix index, which produced a higher median revenue but averaged a median net loss (-$264 compared to +$2436 for EDTs and +$3125 for LAs). The IPTs had higher median comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 3.5 versus 2.9 for EDTs and 2.0 for LAs), age (62 y versus 58 for EDTs and 52 for LAs), and mortality rate (7.5% versus 2.3% for EDTs and 0.4% for LAs). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who present to a tertiary care EGS service as an IPT from another hospital have more comorbidities, higher mortality rate, and result in a financial loss. These data suggest the need for adequate risk adjustment in quality assessment of tertiary referral center outcomes and the need for increased financial reimbursement for the care of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/mortalidad , Cirugía General/economía , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Femenino , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 609, 2019 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are a number of limitations to the present primary eye care system in the UK. Patients with minor eye conditions typically either have to present to their local hospital or GP, or face a charge when visiting eye care professionals (optometrists). Some areas of the UK have commissioned enhanced community services to alleviate this problem; however, many areas have not. The present study is a needs assessment of three areas (Leeds, Airedale and Bradford) without a Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS), with the aim of determining whether such a service is clinically or economically viable. METHOD: A pro forma was developed for optometrists and practice staff to complete when a patient presented whose reason for attending was due to symptoms indicative of a problem that could not be optically corrected. This form captured the reason for visit, whether the patient was seen, the consultation funding, the outcome and where the patient would have presented to if the optometrists could not have seen them. Optometrists were invited to participate via Local Optical Committees. Results were submitted via a Google form or a Microsoft Excel document and were analysed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients were managed in optometric practice. Nine and 16% of patients required subsequent referral to their General Practitioner or hospital ophthalmology department, respectively. Should they not have been seen, 34% of patients would have presented to accident and emergency departments and 59% to their general practitioner. 53% of patients paid privately for the optometrist appointment, 28% of patients received a free examination either through use of General Ophthalmic Service sight tests (9%) or optometrist good will (19%) and 19% of patients did not receive a consultation and were redirected to other providers (e.g. pharmacy, accident and emergency or General Practitioner). 88% of patients were satisfied with the level of service. Cost-analyses revealed a theoretical cost saving of £3198 to the NHS across our sample for the study period, indicating cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This assessment demonstrates that a minor eye condition service in the local areas would be economically and clinically viable and well received by patients.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/terapia , Evaluación de Necesidades , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Oftalmopatías/economía , Médicos Generales/economía , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Oftalmología/estadística & datos numéricos , Optometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Pediatr Neurosurg ; 54(5): 301-309, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric neurosurgeons are occasionally tasked with performing surgery expeditiously to preserve a child's neurologic faculties and life. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the etiologies, outcomes, and costs for urgent or emergent craniotomies at a Level I Pediatric Trauma center over a 7-year time period. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for each patient who underwent an emergent or urgent craniotomy within 24 hours of presentation between January 2010 and April 2017. Demographic, clinical, and surgical details were recorded for a total of 48 variables. Any readmission within 90 days was analyzed. Hospital charges for each admission and readmission were collected and adjusted for inflation to October 2018 values. RESULTS: Among the 223 children who underwent urgent or emergent craniotomies, the majority were admitted for traumatic injuries (n = 163, 73.1%). The most common traumatic mechanism was fall (n = 51, 22.9%), and the most common non-traumatic cause was tumor (n = 21, 9.4%). Overall, craniotomies were typically performed for hematoma evacuation of one type or combination (n = 115, 51.6%) during off-peak times (n = 178, 79.8%). Seventy-seven (34.5%) subjects experienced 1 or more postoperative events, 22 of whom returned to the operating room. There were 13 (5.8%) and 33 (14.8%) readmissions within 30 days and 90 days of discharge, respectively. Non-trauma patients (compared with trauma patients) and polytrauma (compared with isolated head injury) had greater healthcare needs, resulting in higher charges. CONCLUSION: Most urgent or emergent pediatric craniotomies were performed for the treatment of traumatic injuries involving hematoma evacuation, but non-traumatic patients were more complex requiring greater resources.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Craneotomía/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/tendencias , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/economía , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/cirugía , Craneotomía/tendencias , Tratamiento de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Oral Rehabil ; 46(2): 120-126, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30307640

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of two emergency treatment procedures to alleviate pain from localised symptomatic apical periodontitis: complete chemo-mechanical disinfection (CMD) of the root canal system, or removal of necrotic tissue from the pulp chamber (RNT), that is without instrumentation of the root canals. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients from the emergency clinic at Malmö University met the inclusion criteria: spontaneous pain and/or pain on percussion and palpation, non-bleeding pulp in the canal orifice, pain ≥4 on a Numeric Rating Scale and ≥18 years of age. The diagnosis was symptomatic apical periodontitis, in the absence of swelling and/or fever. Pre-operative pain levels and intake of analgesics were registered. The patients were randomised to one of the two treatment groups. Three to five days post-operatively, the patients were contacted by telephone and asked to grade their current pain level and report any post-operative intake of analgesics and antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with CMD of the root canal system, 26/30 (87%) reported satisfactory pain relief, compared with 22/27 (81%) of those treated by RNT. There was no mean difference in pain relief between the two groups (P = 0.879). Post-operatively, 37% in each group reported using analgesics and one in each group reported using antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Three to five days after treatment, a majority (>80%) in both groups reported adequate pain relief, in some cases in combination with analgesics. Removal of necrotic and infected tissue from the pulp chamber might therefore be a cost-effective emergency treatment alternative to complete chemo-mechanical disinfection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Dolor Facial/patología , Dolor Facial/terapia , Periodontitis Periapical/patología , Periodontitis Periapical/terapia , Pulpectomía , Tratamiento del Conducto Radicular , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Dolor Facial/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Periodontitis Periapical/complicaciones , Periodontitis Periapical/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Pulpectomía/economía , Tratamiento del Conducto Radicular/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Surg Res ; 227: 101-111, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29804841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients and hospitals face significant financial burdens from emergency general surgeries (EGSs), which have been termed a public health crisis in the United States. We evaluated hospitalization charges, operating charges, and variations in operating time by surgeon volume for three common EGS procedures. METHODS: Using Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we performed a retrospective study of laparoscopic appendectomies, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and open bowel resections performed by general surgeons among adult patients from July 2012 to September 2014. We compared operating charges to total hospitalization charges and quantified variations in operating time for each procedure. We then divided patients into quartiles based on their surgeon's procedure-specific case volume and used hierarchical linear regressions to calculate differences in both operating time and charges between quartiles. RESULTS: We identified 3194 appendectomies, 4143 cholecystectomies, and 1478 bowel resections. Operating charges accounted for one-quarter (26.9%) of total hospitalization charges and widespread variation existed in operating time (appendectomies: median 79 min [interquartile range 66-100 min], cholecystectomies: 96 min [76-125 min], bowel resections: 155 min [117-209 min]). After adjustment, low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons did not operate statistically longer for appendectomies (+1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2% to 5%) but operated +16% (95% CI: 12%-20%) longer for cholecystectomies (+14 min) and +40% (95% CI: 30%-50%) longer for bowel resections (+59 min). Adjusted median operating charges from low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons were $554 (26.7%), $621 (22.0%), and $1801 (47.0%) greater for appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and bowel resections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Operating charges contributed substantially to total EGS hospitalization charges, where low-volume surgeons operated longer and had higher operative charges relative to high-volume surgeons. Reducing variations in operating times and charges represents an opportunity to alleviate the financial burden from EGS procedures.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Honorarios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/economía , Carga de Trabajo/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
10.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 29(4): 463-470, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30293698

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (APIS) lies at the northern tip of Wisconsin and is home to a network of 21 islands along Lake Superior. The goal of this report is to investigate search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) trends at APIS in an effort to improve visitor safety and resource allocation. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis reviewing APIS SAR reports and annual EMS summary reports from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015. Information related to incident type, incident date, individual demographic characteristics and activities, injury/illness type, cost, and contributing factors were recorded and analyzed in frequency tables. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2015, APIS SAR conducted 133 total missions assisting 261 individuals-200 not injured/ill, 57 injured/ill, and 4 fatalities. Median cost per SAR incident involving aircraft totaled $21,695 (range: $2,993-141,849), whereas incidents not involving aircraft had a median cost of $363 (range: $35-8,830). Nonmotorized boating was the most common activity resulting in SAR incidents. All 4 fatalities were attributed to drowning while kayaking or swimming. Cold-related injury/illness accounted for nearly half of all injuries/illnesses (45%) with the most commonly reported contributing factor being high winds. EMS responded to a total of 134 incidents. Trauma and first aid accounted for 43% and 34% of EMS workload, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study highlights the hazards associated with the frigid and rough conditions of Lake Superior. The reported results aim to help APIS personnel more saliently convey risks to visitors and plan appropriately in an effort to decrease the need for future rescues.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Parques Recreativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Rescate/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/tendencias , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Trabajo de Rescate/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Wisconsin/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(5): 1180-1187, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27909825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after nonelective surgery for gastric cancer (GC) are poorly defined. Our objective was to compare outcomes of patients undergoing nonelective GC surgery after admission through the emergency department (EDSx) with patients receiving elective surgery or surgery after planned admission (non-EDSx) nationally. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to examine patients undergoing GC surgery between 2008 and 2012. Demographics and outcomes were compared between EDSx and non-EDSx. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine predictors of discharge to home. RESULTS: Of 9279 patients, 1143 (12%) underwent EDSx. They were more likely to be female (42 vs. 35%), nonwhite (56 vs. 33%), aged ≥75 years (40 vs. 26%), in the lowest quartile for household income (31 vs. 25%), have one or more comorbidities (87 vs. 70%), treated at a nonteaching hospital (46 vs. 25%), and have a concomitant diagnosis of obstruction, perforation, or bleeding (30 vs. 6%). They had longer total length of stay (LOS; 16 vs. 9 days), longer median postoperative stays (10 vs. 9 days), higher in-hospital mortality (8 vs. 3%), and were less likely to be discharged home (63 vs. 82%). EDSx was more expensive ($125,300 vs. $83,604). EDSx was associated with a lower likelihood of discharge to home (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, 12% of GC surgeries are performed after emergency department admission, which occurs more frequently in vulnerable populations and results in worse outcomes. Understanding factors leading to increased EDSx and developing strategies to decrease EDSx may improve GC surgery outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
12.
J Emerg Med ; 53(2): 186-194, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Care provided in the emergency department (ED) can cost up to five times as much as care received for comparable diagnoses in alternative settings. Small groups of patients, many of whom suffer from an opioid use disorder, often account for a large proportion of total ED visits. We recently conducted, and demonstrated the effectiveness of, the first randomized controlled trial of a citywide ED care-coordination program intending to reduce prescription-opioid-related ED visits. All EDs in the metropolitan study area were connected to a Web-based information exchange system. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to perform an economic evaluation of the 12-month trial from a third-party-payer perspective. METHODS: We modeled the person-period monthly for the 12-month observation period, and estimated total treatment costs and return on investment (ROI) with regard to cost offsets, over time, for all visits where the patient was admitted to and discharged from the ED. RESULTS: By the end of month 4, the mean cumulative cost differential was significantly lower for intervention relative to treatment-as-usual participants (-$1370; p = 0.03); this figure climbed to -$3200 (p = 0.02) by the end of month 12. The ROI trended upward throughout the observation period, but failed to reach statistical significance by the end of month 12 (ROI = 3.39, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The intervention produced significant cost offsets by the end of month 4, which continued to accumulate throughout the trial; however, ROI was not significant. Because the per-patient administrative costs of the program are incurred at the time of enrollment, our results highlight the importance of future studies that are able to follow participants for a period beyond 12 months to more accurately estimate the program's ROI.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Conducta Cooperativa , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Aglomeración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Tratamiento de Urgencia/efectos adversos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología
13.
N Engl J Med ; 368(22): 2105-12, 2013 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established nationwide eligibility for young adults 19 to 25 years of age to retain coverage under their parents' private health plans. We conducted a study to determine how the implementation of this provision changed rates of insurance coverage for young adults seeking medical care for major emergencies. METHODS: We evaluated more than 480,000 nondiscretionary visits made to emergency departments from 2009 through 2011, as recorded in a large, geographically diverse data set of hospital claims, to estimate how the ACA provision affected private insurance coverage of such visits by young adults (19 to 25 years of age). To adjust for underlying trends in insurance coverage, we compared changes in the target age group with changes among adults 26 to 31 years of age, who were unaffected by the provision (control group). RESULTS: After the ACA provision took effect, private coverage of nondiscretionary visits to emergency departments by young adults increased by 3.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 3.9; relative increase, 5.2%; P<0.001), as compared with similar visits in the control group. The percentage of visits by uninsured young adults also fell significantly (-1.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.8 to -0.7; relative decrease, 9.1%; P<0.001). The rates of nondiscretionary visits that were covered by Medicaid or other nonprivate insurers remained relatively steady throughout the study period. The coverage expansion led to an estimated 22,072 visits to emergency departments by newly insured young adults and $147 million in associated costs that were covered by private insurance plans during a 1-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Enactment of the dependent-coverage provision was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of young adults who were protected from the financial consequences of a serious medical emergency. (Funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services.).


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/economía , Medicaid/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
14.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 95(10): 1111-9, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496301

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We aim to outline the annual cost of setting up and running a standard, local, multi-professional obstetric emergencies training course, PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training), at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK - a unit caring for approximately 6500 births per year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, micro-costing analysis was performed. Start-up costs included purchasing training mannequins and teaching props, printing of training materials and assembly of emergency boxes (real and training). The variable costs included administration time, room hire, additional printing and the cost of releasing all maternity staff in the unit, either as attendees or trainers. Potential, extra start-up costs for maternity units without established training were also included. RESULTS: The start-up costs were €5574 and the variable costs for 1 year were €143 232. The total cost of establishing and running training at Southmead for 1 year was €148 806. Releasing staff as attendees or trainers accounted for 89% of the total first year costs, and 92% of the variable costs. The cost of running training in a maternity unit with around 6500 births per year was approximately €23 000 per 1000 births for the first year and around €22 000 per 1000 births in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of local, multi-professional obstetric emergencies training is not cheap, with staff costs potentially representing over 90% of the total expenditure. It is therefore vital that organizations consider the clinical effectiveness of local training packages before implementing them, to ensure the optimal allocation of finite healthcare budgets.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Capacitación en Servicio/economía , Personal de Hospital/economía , Personal de Hospital/educación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
15.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(3): 459-63, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26763824

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frequent emergency department (ED) use has been identified as a cause of ED overcrowding and increasing health care costs. Studies have examined the expense of frequent patients (FPs) to hospitals but have not added the cost Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to estimate the total cost of this pattern of care. METHODS: Data on 2012 ED visits to a rural Level I Trauma Center and public safety net hospital were collected through a deidentified patient database. Transport data and 2012 Medicare Reimbursement Schedules were used to estimate the cost of EMS transport. Health information, outcomes, and costs were compared to find differences between the FP and non-FP group. RESULTS: This study identified 1242 FPs who visited the ED 5 or more times in 2012. Frequent patients comprised 3.25% of ED patients but accounted for 17% of ED visits and 13.7% of hospital costs. Frequent patients had higher rates of chronic disease, severity scores, and mortality. Frequent patients arrived more often via ambulance and accounted for 32% of total transports at an estimated cost of $2.5-$3.2 million. Hospital costs attributable to FPs were $29.1 million, bringing the total cost of emergency care to $31.6-$32.3 million, approximately $25,000 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the inclusion of a prehospital cost estimate adds approximately 10% to the cost of care for the FP population. In addition to improving care for a sick population of patients, programs that reduce frequent EMS and ED use have the potential to produce a favorable cost benefit to communities and health systems.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino
16.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 52(2): 221-6, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27062627

RESUMEN

Acute care of seriously ill children is a global public health issue, and there is much scope for improving quality of care in hospitals at all levels in many developing countries. We describe the current state of paediatric emergency and acute care in the least developed regions of low and middle income countries and identify gaps and requirements for improving quality. Approaches are needed which span the continuum of care: from triage and emergency treatment, the diagnostic process, identification of co-morbidities, treatment, monitoring and supportive care, discharge planning and follow-up. Improvements require support and training for health workers and quality processes. Effective training is that which is ongoing, combining good technical training in under-graduate courses and continuing professional development. Quality processes combine evidence-based guidelines, essential medicines, appropriate technology, appropriate financing of services, standards and assessment tools and training resources. While initial emergency treatment is based on common clinical syndromes, early differentiation is required for specific treatment, and this can usually be carried out clinically without expensive tests. While global strategies are important, it is what happens locally that makes a difference and is too often neglected. In rural areas in the poorest countries in the world, public doctors and nurses who provide emergency and acute care for children are revered by their communities and demonstrate daily that much can be carried out with little.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Países en Desarrollo , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/métodos , Niño , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Humanos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/economía , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
17.
Br J Surg ; 102(2): e102-7, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25627121

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At the core of surgical development in any economic environment lies innovation. Innovation in high-income countries (HICs) often derives from research, whereas innovation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may be spontaneous owing to a desperate drive to meet a local need. The local needs are substantial because of the unequal access to healthcare in LMICs. METHODS: The experience of the author in working in LMICs through Operation Hernia, a medical charity, provides a backdrop for this review. Other published innovative devices and models are discussed. RESULTS: Innovation in income-poor countries has provided cost-effective but efficient solutions to local health needs. Some innovations have been enhanced and adopted worldwide. CONCLUSION: HICs can learn more from innovative strategies adopted in LMICs.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Invenciones/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/tendencias , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/economía , Delegación Profesional , Atención a la Salud/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/economía , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Humanos , Invenciones/economía , Oximetría/economía , Oximetría/instrumentación , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Terapias en Investigación/economía , Terapias en Investigación/tendencias
18.
J Nurs Adm ; 45(1): 7-10, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25479169

RESUMEN

With a recent decrease in community resources for the mental health population, acute care facilities must seek creative, cost-effective ways to protect and care for these vulnerable individuals. This article describes 1 facility's journey to maintaining patient and staff safety while reducing cost. Success factors of this program include staff engagement, environmental modifications, and a nurse-driven, sitter-reduction process.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Liderazgo , Trastornos Mentales/enfermería , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Rol de la Enfermera , Innovación Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Administración de la Seguridad/economía , Estados Unidos
19.
Br J Surg ; 101(1): e9-22, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24272924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical disease is inadequately addressed globally, and emergency conditions requiring surgery contribute substantially to the global disease burden. METHODS: This was a review of studies that contributed to define the population-based health burden of emergency surgical conditions (excluding trauma and obstetrics) and the status of available capacity to address this burden. Further data were retrieved from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 and the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation online data. RESULTS: In the index year of 2010, there were 896,000 deaths, 20 million years of life lost and 25 million disability-adjusted life-years from 11 emergency general surgical conditions reported individually in the Global Burden of Disease Study. The most common cause of death was complicated peptic ulcer disease, followed by aortic aneurysm, bowel obstruction, biliary disease, mesenteric ischaemia, peripheral vascular disease, abscess and soft tissue infections, and appendicitis. The mortality rate was higher in high-income countries (HICs) than in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (24.3 versus 10.6 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants respectively), primarily owing to a higher rate of vascular disease in HICs. However, because of the much larger population, 70 per cent of deaths occurred in LMICs. Deaths from vascular disease rose from 15 to 25 per cent of surgical emergency-related deaths in LMICs (from 1990 to 2010). Surgical capacity to address this burden is suboptimal in LMICs, with fewer than one operating theatre per 100,000 inhabitants in many LMICs, whereas some HICs have more than 14 per 100,000 inhabitants. CONCLUSION: The global burden of surgical emergencies is described insufficiently. The bare estimates indicate a tremendous health burden. LMICs carry the majority of emergency conditions; in these countries the pattern of surgical disease is changing and capacity to deal with the problem is inadequate. The data presented in this study will be useful for both the surgical and public health communities to plan a more adequate response.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Mortalidad Prematura , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Swed Dent J ; 38(2): 57-66, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25102716

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the revenues cover the costs in a pilot capitation plan, a dental insurance scheme, and to compare this capitation plan (CP) with the original fee-for-service system (FFS), in terms of the amount and type of dental care provided. Data was collected longitudinally over a period of three years from 1,650 CP patients in five risk groups at a test clinic, and from 1,609 (from the test clinic) and 3,434 (from a matched control clinic) FFS patients, in Göteborg, Sweden. The care investigated was the number of total treatments provided and the number of examinations by dentists and dental hygienists, together with preventive, restorative and emergency treatments. The economic outcome was positive from the administrator's perspective, in all risk groups for the three-year period. The amount and type of care provided differed between the payment models, as CP patients received more preventive treatments, less restorative treatments, and more examinations by dental hygienists than the FFS patients. Emergency treatment was performed more often on CP patients, and the difference was due to a higher frequency of such treatments among women in the CP group. The difference between clinics concerning certain treatment measures was sometimes greater than the difference between payment models. The results from this study indicate a net positive economic outcome for the pilot CP system over three years. The payment model and the clinic affiliation had impact on what type and amount of dental care the patients received. This might suggest that the risk of skewed selection and its consequences as well as the influence of clinic-specific practice need further investigation, to ensure economic sustainability in a longer perspective.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/economía , Seguro Odontológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Capitación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Higienistas Dentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Operatoria Dental/economía , Operatoria Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Honorarios Odontológicos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Renta , Seguro Odontológico/economía , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Odontología Preventiva/economía , Odontología Preventiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suecia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA