Intravenous lidocaine vs. NSAIDs for migraine attack in the ED: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

PURPOSE: Although different forms of lidocaine are used for migraine attack headaches, the effect of intravenous lidocaine is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of migraine attack headaches. METHODS: A hundred patients with migraine attacks, aged between 18 and 65, were randomly divided into two groups. The lidocaine group (n = 50) received a 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine bolus and a 1 mg/kg infusion (first 30 min), followed by a 0.5 mg/kg infusion for a further 30 min intravenously. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) group (n = 50) received 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol and saline at the same volume as the lidocaine at the same time intervals intravenously. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, additional analgesia requirement, side effects, and revisits to the emergency department were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group for the first 20th and 30th minutes (p = 0.014 and p = 0.024, respectively). There was no difference between the VAS scores for the remaining evaluation times (p > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcomes, rescue medication requirement was not different between the two groups at both the 60th and 90th minutes (p > 0.05). However, the number of patients revisiting ED within 48-72 h was statistically less in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group (1/50 vs. 8/50; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine may be an alternative treatment method for patients with migraine attack headaches in the emergency department.

Intravenous metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous, single-dose metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol in patients presenting with acute migraine attack to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This single-center, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in a tertiary care ED. Eligible patients met the migraine criteria of the International Headache Society were randomized to receive 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide, 50 mg intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol, or 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol +10 mg metoclopramide. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for pain measurement at baseline, after 15 and 30 min. The primary outcome measure was the changes in the VAS scores at the 15th and 30th minutes of treatment. The secondary outcome measures were the presence of adverse effects and the requirement of rescue medicine. RESULTS: Patients (n = 150) were randomized into 3 groups with similar VAS scores at baseline. While there was no significant difference between metoclopramide and dexketoprofen trometamol in reducing pain at the 15th and 30th minute (p = 0.618 and p = 0.862, respectively) and between metoclopramide and metoclopramide + dexketoprofen trometamol at the 15th minute (p = 0.074), metoclopramide + dexketoprofen trometamol was superior to both metoclopramide [mean difference: -13.2 mm (95% CI -23.1 to -3.3)] and dexketoprofen trometamol [mean difference: -11.02 mm (95% CI -20.9 to -1.1)] at the 30th min (p = 0.006 and p = 0.025 respectively). The rescue drug was required by 3 patients (6%) were in metoclopramide group, 4 patients (8%) in dexketoprofen trometamol group and one patient (2%) in the metoclopramide + dexketoprofen trometamol group. No side effects were observed in subjects in three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in VAS was found between three treatment groups at the 15th minute, but metoclopramide + dexketoprofen trometamol was superior to both metoclopramide and dexketoprofen trometamol at the 30th min.

An in vitro investigation of genotoxic effects of dexketoprofen trometamol on healthy human lymphocytes.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are drugs with analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory effects. This study uses in vitro methods to investigate the potential and unknown genotoxic effects of dexketoprofen trometamol, an active substance in painkillers, on healthy human lymphocytes. In this study, a cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay is used to investigate potential clastogenic, aneugenic activity and to identify chromosome breakages caused by the active drug substance dexketoprofen trometamol; a comet assay is performed to identify the genotoxic damage resulting from DNA single-strand breaks; a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction panel system is used to evaluate the potential negative effects on the expression of the genes responsible for DNA damage assessment. Dexketoprofen trometamol induces toxic effects in healthy human lymphocytes at concentrations of 750-1000 µg/mL and above, and shows clastogenic, aneugenic activity by inducing micronucleus formations at exposures of 750-500 µg/mL. At concentration intervals of 1000, 500, 250, 100 µg/mL, dexketoprofen trometamol also resulted in DNA damage in the form of strand breaks, as demonstrated by highly significant increases in DNA tail length and density comet parameters when compared to spontaneous values. Human lymphocytes exposed to 750-100 µg/mL dexketoprofen trometamol were found to have significantly increased levels of expression of the XPC, XRCC6, PNKP genes in the DNA damage signaling pathway. It can be concluded that dexketoprofen trometamol may have cytotoxic, cytostatic, genotoxic effects on healthy human lymphocytes in vitro, depending on the concentration and duration of exposure. It is anticipated that this outcome will be supported by advanced studies.

Intravenous dexketoprofen versus paracetamol in non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although acute musculoskeletal pain has a wide range of causes from tendinitis, muscle spasm, to bone and joint injuries, it is a frequent occurrence in emergency services. Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) are common used in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study sets out to compare the effectiveness of intravenous dexketoprofen and paracetamol in musculoskeletal pain relief. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study was carried out in a university emergency room. The participating patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 50 mg of dexketoprofen or 1000 mg of paracetamol intravenously by rapid infusion in 150 ml of normal saline. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scala (NRS) was employed for pain measurement at baseline, after 15, after 30 and after 60 mins. RESULTS: 200 patients were included in the study, excluding 7342 of them. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 32,6. Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention decreases NRS pain scores over time. When compared to all pain locations, the NRS pain score of the patients was found to be statistically more effective in dexketoprofen than in paracetamol (p = 0.001). Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention reduces pain VAS scores over time. When the VAS pain score of the patients was compared to all pain locations, dexketoprofen was found to be statistically more effective than paracetamol (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intravenous dexketoprofen seemed to achieve superior analgesia to intravenous paracetamol when compared with all pain locations in patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain.

Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute musculoskeletal trauma in the emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal system traumas are among the most common presentations in the emergency departments. In the treatment of traumatic musculoskeletal pain, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) are frequently used. Our aim in this study is to compare the efficacy of intravenous dexketoprofen and paracetamol in the treatment of traumatic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care emergency unit. The participating patients were randomised into two groups to receive either 50 mg of dexketoprofen or 1000 mg of paracetamol intravenously by rapid infusion in 150 mL of normal saline. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scala (NRS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was employed for pain measurement at baseline, after 15, after 30 and after 60 mins. RESULTS: 200 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age of the paracetamol group was 34 (24-48), while that of the dexketoprofen group was 35 (23-50), and 63% (n = 126) of them consisted of men. Paracetamol and dexketoprofen administration reduced VAS pain scores over time (p = 0.0001). Median reduction in VAS score at 60 min was 55 (IQR 30-65) for the paracetamol group and 50(IQR 30.25-60) for the dexketoprofen group. There was no statistically significant difference between the paracetamol and dexketoprofen groups in terms of VAS reductions (p = 0.613). CONCLUSION: Intravenous paracetamol and dexketoprofen seem to produce equivalent pain relief for acute musculoskeletal trauma in the emergency department. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NO: NCT03428503.

Intradermal mesotherapy versus systemic therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute musculoskeletal injuries are one of the most common painful presentation when admission to the emergency department. The aim of the study is to compare the tenoxicam mesotherapy with intravenous dexketoprofen in pain control in patients with acute musculoskeletal injury. METHODS: This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted with the patients admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal injury. Intravenous dexketoprofen was administered to the control group, and mesotherapy treatment was performed to the other group. Differences between 10th, 30th, 60th and 120th minutes VAS scores and on the admission VAS score, clinically meaningful change in pain intensity, and adverse effect of the procedures were compared among groups. THE RESULTS: The differences in VAS scores and the presence of clinically meaningful change in pain intensity were statistically significantly higher in mesotherapy group than the systemic therapy group in all time periods. During one-week follow-up period, there was no reported adverse effect neither in mesotherapy group nor in the systemic therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: The mesotherapy treatment may be superior than the systemic therapy for pain relief in musculoskeletal injury in short term follow-up in emergency department settings.

Efficacy and safety of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine for prevention of post-partum blood loss: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Motherwort (YiMuCao), a traditional Chinese herb, has been shown beneficial effects for women's diseases. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine for prevention of post-partum blood loss. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang from their inception to December 2017. Randomized controlled trials that determined the add-on effects of motherwort injection to carboprost for prevention of post-partum blood loss were eligible. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to summarize the effect sizes. Eight trials including 1276 pregnant women fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prophylactic use of motherwort injection add-on therapy significantly reduced the post-partum 2 h (MD -127.5 mL; 95% CI -149.13 to -105.88) and 24 h (MD -146.85 mL; 95% CI -179.77 to -113.94) blood loss and incidence of post-partum hemorrhage (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.17-0.45) than carboprost. Moreover, adjunctive treatment with motherwort injection significantly decreased the length of the third stage of labor (MD -3.41 min; 95% CI -4.33 to -2.49) and duration of lochia (MD -7.13 days; 95% CI -8.49 to -5.76). There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.50-1.16). Prophylactic use of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine could reduce post-partum blood loss. However, more well-designed trials are necessary to confirm the findings of this study due to the methodological flaws of the included trials.

Combined site-specific release retardant mini-matrix tablets (C-SSRRMT) for extended oral delivery of dexketoprofen trometamol: in vitro evaluation and single versus multiple doses pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers.

Development of extended release oral formulations of dexketoprofen trometamol (DT), a rapidly eliminated drug with high solubility, poses a great challenge especially when a portion of the dose is to be absorbed from the colon. In this study, site-specific release-retardant mini-matrix tablets (SSRRMTs) were developed and functionally coated with pH-responsive materials to achieve a site-specific delivery of DT at the duodenojejunal (DSRRMT) and ileocecal (ISRRMT) regions. Stomach-specific coated mini-tablets (SSCMTs) were manufactured for immediate release of about 16% of the daily dose of DT in the stomach. The SSCMT, DSRRMT, and ISRRMT were combined into a solid dosage form (C-SSRRMT tablets or capsules) to achieve the required linear release profile for once daily administration of DT. The SSRRMT and C-SSRRMT formulations were evaluated for the physical properties, in vitro-disintegration and in vitro dissolution and proved to be consistent with the pharmacopeial specifications. The in vitro release profiles of both C-SSRRMT tablets and capsules showed a constant release rate of about 6 mg/h and were similar to that of the theoretical target linear release profile. The pharmacokinetic study using human volunteers showed the bioequivalence of a single oral dose of C-SSRRMT capsules compared to three-successive oral doses of the immediate release market tablets with less ups and downs in the drug levels. The C-SSRRMT capsules formulation, may therefore, constitute an advance in the extended oral delivery of DT without the lack of efficacy and the adverse events frequently encountered in multiple daily dosing of the immediate release tablets.

Efficacy of targeted liposomes and nanocochleates containing imatinib plus dexketoprofen against fibrosarcoma.

The main challenges in treating cancer using chemotherapeutics are insufficient dose at the target site and the development of drug resistance, while higher doses can induce side effects by damaging nontarget tissues. Combinatorial drug therapy may overcome these limitations by permitting lower doses and more specific targeting, thereby mitigating drug resistance and nontarget side effects. Recent reports indicate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have anticancer potential and can be used together with conventional chemotherapeutics to improve efficacy and safety. In the present study, imatinib mesylate and dexketoprofen trometamol were selected as model drugs to develop targeted surface-modified liposome and nanocochleate formulations for fibrosarcoma treatment. The physicochemical properties and in vitro efficacy of various formulations were evaluated by measurement of particle size distribution, polydispersity index, zeta potential, encapsulation efficiency, diffusion through Caco-2 cells, and toxicity in culture. Selected formulations were then evaluated in fibrosarcoma-bearing model mice by histopathological observations and tyrosine kinase receptor inhibition assays. The most effective formulation on the fibrosarcoma model was a PEGylated nanocochleate formulation. These findings provide a foundation for developing more effective formulations and chemotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of fibrosarcoma and other types of cancer.

Evaluation of the analgesic efficacies of Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Thiocolchicoside combinations in the impacted third molar surgery: Randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is one of the most common complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacies of dexketoprofen trometamol and two different dosages of dexketoprofen trometamol + thiocolchicoside combination in the impacted third molar tooth operation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study included 75 patients who did not have any disease. Patients were assigned to 3 groups. Group 1 received 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol + 4 mg thiocholchicoside, Group 2 received 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol +8 mg thiocholchicoside, and Group 3 received 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol. In each group, the analgesic medication was administered twice a day, starting 1 hour before the operation. The level of pain was assessed with VAS. RESULTS: Patient age varied from 18 to 36 years. Of all patients, 59.2% (n=42) were female and 40.8% (n=29) were male. Drug side effects were observed in 28.17% (n=20) of the patients. Mean 24th hour VAS score was lower in dexketoprofen trometamol + 8 mg thiocolchicoside group compared to dexketoprofen trometamol group (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups regarding drug side effects (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexketoprofen trometamol + 8 mg thiocolchicoside combination has higher analgesic efficacy compared to dexketoprofen trometamol. More studies are needed to interpret the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of thiocholchicoside + dexketoprofen trometamol combination.

The effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade in treating acute migraine-related headaches in emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a greater occipital nerve (GON) blockade against a placebo and classical treatments (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs + metoclopramide) among patients who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) with acute migraine headaches. METHOD: This prospective-randomized controlled study was conducted on patients with acute migraine headaches. The patients were randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups: the GON blockade group (nerve blockade with bupivacaine), the placebo group (injection of normal saline into the GON area), and the intravenous (IV) treatment group (IV dexketoprofen and metoclopramide). Sixty acute migraine attack patients were assigned to 3 groups of 20 patients each. The pain severity was assessed at 5, 15, 30, and 45 minutes with a 10-point pain scale score (PSS). RESULTS: The mean decreases in the 5-, 15-, 30-, and 45-minutes PSS scores were greater in the GON blockade group than in the dexketoprofen and placebo groups. When comparing the 30- and 45-minutes PSS changes, a statistically significant difference was found among the 3 groups (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSION: A GON blockade was as effective as an IV dexketoprofen + metoclopramide treatment and superior to a placebo in patients with acute migraine headaches. Despite being an invasive procedure, a GON blockade might be an effective option for acute migraine treatment in the ED due to its rapid, easy, and safe application.

Comparison of IV dexketoprofen trometamol, fentanyl, and paracetamol in the treatment of renal colic in the ED: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol, fentanyl, and paracetamol in patients presenting to the emergency department with renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Data obtained from the emergency departments of Gaziantep University's Hospital for Research and Practice along with two other state hospitals in Gaziantep, Turkey between January 2016 and January 2017 was used for this study. A total of three hundred patients (n=300), who presented to the ER with complaints most common to renal colic whose diagnoses were subsequently confirmed with Computerized Tomography were included in the study. Patients' pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale, at admission (immediately before drug administration), then at the 15th, and 30th minutes. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for analysis. p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At the 15th minute comparison, the efficacies of the three groups of drugs were not superior to one other, but at the 30th minute, dexketoprofen trometamol was statistically more effective than paracetamol and fentanyl. There was no statistically significant difference between fentanyl and paracetamol. The need for additional analgesia in the group receiving dexketoprofen trometamol was found to be lower. Dexketoprofen trometamol was statistically superior to the other two agents in achieving full analgesia at the end of the thirty-minute period. Fentanyl was found to be statistically significant in achieving moderate analgesia. CONCLUSION: As a Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug dexketoprofen trometamol is superior to paracetamol and fentanyl in achieving analgesia and reducing the need for additional drugs for the treatment of renal colic.

Safety Assessment of Tromethamine, Aminomethyl Propanediol, and Aminoethyl Propanediol as Used in Cosmetics.

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediolas used in cosmetics. All 3 ingredients are reported to function in cosmetics as pH adjusters, and tromethamine and aminomethyl propanediol are also reported to function as fragrance ingredients. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data related to these ingredients, along with a previous safety assessment of aminomethyl propanediol. The Panel concluded that tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediol are safe in cosmetics in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.

[Issues of spectrum and local sensitivity of E. coli in female patients with acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection a review of M. Seitz study and own observations].

RELEVANCE: Acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (AULUTI) are one of the most common diseases in urological practice. The management of cystitis is commonly based on antibacterial therapy. Despite the high efficiency, inadequate prescription of antibiotics leads to an increase in microorganisms resistance. In light of these matters, the selection of antibacterial agents to which the sensitivity of bacteria is the highest is becoming increasingly challenging. AIM: To estimate the spectrum and local sensitivity of E. coli in patients with AULUTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study analyzed the results of bacterial culture sampled from 45 patients with AULUTI. The mean age of the patients was 44+/-17 years. All bacterial cultures were obtained in out-patient settings in the framework of a multicenter initiative study on the prevention of recurrent AULUTI with d-mannose. RESULTS: Microbiological studies of the urine of patients with AULUTI revealed the growth of E. coli in concentrations ranging from 104 to 107 CFU/ml. Assessment of sensitivity demonstrated 100% sensitivity of Escherichia coli to fosfomycin trometamol. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of microbiological studies, the patients with the AULUTI retain the highest sensitivity level of E.coli to phosphomycin trometamol, which allows it to be used as a first-line drug.

Ketoprofen gel improves low back pain in addition to IV dexketoprofen: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Oligoanalgesia is common in emergency departments (EDs), and pain management is of concern for ED physicians. The aim of this study was to reveal the effect of ketoprofen gel in patients presenting with mechanical low back pain to the ED. METHOD: All the study patients received intravenous dexketoprofen additional to study drugs. After dexketoprofen, 2 g of 2.5% ketoprofen gel or placebo was administered to the site with pain and tenderness. Pain relief at 15 and 30 minutes was measured by visual analog scale scores. Rescue drug need and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean age of the study patients was 35±12, and 56% (n=79) of them were male. The mean pain reduction at 30 minutes was 52±18 for ketoprofen gel and 37±17 for placebo, and ketoprofen gel was better than placebo at 30 minutes (mean difference, 16 mm; 95% confidence interval, 10-21). Ten patients (14%) in the placebo group and 2 patients (3%) in the ketoprofen gel group needed rescue drug (P=.35). CONCLUSION: Ketoprofen gel improves pain in patients presenting with mechanical low back pain to ED at 30 minutes in addition to intravenous dexketoprofen when compared to placebo.

Dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg: randomised double-blind trial in moderate-to-severe acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Dexketoprofen trometamol plus tramadol hydrochloride is a new oral combination of two analgesics, which have different mechanisms of action for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain. METHODS: Randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo and active-controlled, single and multiple-dose study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg in comparison with the single agents (dexketoprofen 25 mg and tramadol 100 mg) in moderate to severe acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy. Patients received seven consecutive doses of study drug within a 3-day period, each dose separated by an 8-hour interval. A placebo arm was included during the single-dose phase to validate the pain model. Efficacy assessments included pain intensity, pain relief, patient global evaluation and use of rescue medication. The primary endpoint was the mean sum of pain intensity differences over the first 8 h (SPID8). RESULTS: The efficacy analysis included 606 patients, with a mean age of 48 years (range 25-73). The study results confirmed the superiority of the combination over the single agents in terms of the primary endpoint (p <0.001). Secondary endpoints were generally supportive of the superiority of the combination for both single and multiple doses. Most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were nausea (4.6%) and vomiting (2.3%). All other ADRs were experienced by less than 2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study results provided robust evidence of the superiority of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg over the single components in the management of moderate to severe acute pain, as confirmed by the single-dose efficacy, repeated-dose sustained effect and good safety profile observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT number 2012-004545-32, registered 04 October 2012); Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01904149, registered 17 July 2013).

Selective non-antibiotic treatment in sigmoid diverticulitis: is it time to change the traditional approach?

BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge is calling into question the use of antibiotics in acute diverticulitis (AD). Moreover, recent studies provide evidence regarding the security of treating patients with AD as outpatients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a restrictive antibiotic outpatient protocol for the treatment of mild-to-moderate episodes of AD. METHODS: All patients with symptoms of AD presenting to our emergency department were assigned a modified Neff stage. Patients with mild AD received outpatient treatment without antibiotics. Patients with mild AD and comorbidities were admitted to receive the same treatment. Patients with moderate AD were admitted for 48 h and were then managed as outpatients until they had completed 10 days of antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Between April 2013 and November 2014, we attended 110 patients with a diagnosis of AD, 77 of whom we included in the study: 45 patients with mild AD and 32 with moderate AD. Of the patients with mild AD, 88.8 % successfully completed the non-antibiotic, non-admission treatment regime and 95.5 % benefited from a non-antibiotic regime, whether as outpatients or inpatients. A total of 88 % of patients with mild AD and 87.5 % of patients with moderate AD who met the inclusion criteria completed treatment as outpatients without incident. No major complications (abscess, emergency surgery) or deaths were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment without antibiotics for patients with mild AD is safe and effective. Patients with moderate AD can be safely treated with antibiotics in a mixed regime as inpatients and outpatients.

Interaction of chlorhexidine with trisEDTA or miconazole in vitro against canine meticillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from two UK regions.

BACKGROUND: Topical therapy is an important alternative to systemic antibacterial therapy for treatment of canine superficial pyoderma in light of the emergence of multidrug-resistant staphylococci. Chlorhexidine is widely used in shampoo products alone or in combination with miconazole or tromethamine-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (trisEDTA). Comparisons of these combinations have not been made. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of combinations of chlorhexidine/miconazole and chlorhexidine/trisEDTA in vitro in a collection of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (SP) from northern (NUK) and southeastern (SEUK) United Kingdom (UK) sources. METHODS: MICs of chlorhexidine, miconazole, trisEDTA and combinations of chlorhexidine/miconazole (1:1) or chlorhexidine/trisEDTA (80:16:1 and 80:5:1) were determined for 196 canine SP isolates from NUK [49 meticillin-resistant (MRSP), 50 meticillin-susceptible (MSSP)] and fom SEUK (48 MRSP, 49 MSSP) using agar dilution. RESULTS: TrisEDTA alone did not inhibit growth. Chlorhexidine/miconazole MICs (median = 0.5 mg/L) were lower than those of either drug alone (P < 0.05) and lower than chlorhexidine/trisEDTA MICs (median = 1 mg/L; P < 0.0005) in each bacterial type and from both regions, except for miconazole in NUK MSSP. An additive interaction was noted between chlorhexidine and miconazole or trisEDTA (80:16:1 ratio) in 79 and 43 isolates, respectively, whereas antagonism between chlorhexidine and trisEDTA was noted for three isolates. NUK isolates were more susceptible than SEUK isolates (P < 0.05), except MRSP exposed to chlorhexidine and the chlorhexidine/trisEDTA (80:16:1) combination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These low MICs are likely to be exceeded by topical therapy. Evaluation of the mechanisms by which chlorhexidine combinations interact to reduce MICs is warranted, in view of increasing concerns of biocide tolerance in staphylococci.

Early (≤ 1-h) vs. late (>1-h) administration of frovatriptan plus dexketoprofen combination vs. frovatriptan monotherapy in the acute treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura: a post hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study.

The early use of triptan in combination with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug after headache onset may improve the efficacy of acute migraine treatment. In this retrospective analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, we assessed the efficacy of early or late intake of frovatriptan 2.5 mg + dexketoprofen 25 or 37.5 mg (FroDex 25 and FroDex 37.5) vs. frovatriptan 2.5 mg alone (Frova) in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. In this double-blind, randomized parallel group study 314 subjects with acute migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to Frova, FroDex 25, or FroDex 37.5. Pain free (PF) at 2-h (primary endpoint), PF at 4-h and pain relief (PR) at 2 and 4-h, speed of onset at 60, 90, 120 and 240-min, and sustained pain free (SPF) at 24-h were compared across study groups according to early (≤1-h; n = 220) or late (>1-h; n = 59) intake. PF rates at 2 and 4-h were significantly larger with FroDex 37.5 vs. Frova (early intake, n = 71 FroDex 37.5 and n = 75 Frova: 49 vs. 32 % and 68 vs. 52 %, p < 0.05; late intake, n = 20 Frodex 37.5, and n = 18 Frova: 55 vs. 17 %, p < 0.05 and 85 vs. 28 %, p < 0.01). Also with FroDex 25, in the early intake group (n = 74) PF episodes were significantly higher than Frova. PR at 2 and 4-h was significantly better under FroDex 37.5 than Frova (95 % vs. 50 %, p < 0.001, 100 % vs. 72 %, p < 0.05) in the late intake group (n = 21). SPF episodes at 24-h after early dosing were 25 % (Frova), 45 % (FroDex 25) and 41 % (FroDex 37.5, p < 0.05 combinations vs. monotherapy), whereas they were not significantly different with late intake. All treatments were equally well tolerated. FroDex was similarly effective regardless of intake timing from headache onset.

Effect of paracetamol, dexketoprofen trometamol, lidocaine spray, pethidine & diclofenac sodium application for pain relief during fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Patients frequently experience pain of moderate to severe degree during gynaecologic procedures. This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of preoperative oral dexketoprofen trometamol, intravenous paracetamol, lidocaine spray, pethidine and diclofenac sodium on fractional curettage procedure. METHODS: A total of 144 multiparous women were randomly allocated to one of the six groups. The first group (control group) consisted of 22 participants and they did not receive any treatment. The second group had 26 participants receiving oral 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol. The 23 participants of the third group received two puff lidocaine sprays on cervical mucosa. t0 he forth group consisted of 25 participants receiving 100 mg pethidine. In the fifth group, the 23 participants received 1000 mg intravenous paracetamol and the sixth group consisted of 25 participants receiving diclofenac sodium. RESULTS: Pethidine was the best choice for reducing pain score during curettage procedure (t2:intra-operative). All analgesic procedures were significantly effective in reducing pain during postoperative period (t3). Significant pain reduction was achieved for both intra- and postoperative period by using analgesics. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed that lidocaine puffs provided the best pain relief than the other analgesics used. Therefore, lidocaine may be considered as the first choice analgesic in fractional curettage (NCT ID: 01993589).