Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 154
Filtrar
1.
Bull World Health Organ ; 99(7): 506-513, 2021 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34248223

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost and effectiveness of the two-site, 1-week, intradermal rabies post-exposure prophylaxis regimen recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2018. METHODS: We compared the number of rabies vaccine and rabies immunoglobulin ampoules consumed at The Indus Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan and their cost before and after implementing WHO's 2018 recommendations. In 2017, patients with suspected rabies-infected bites were treated using the two-site, 4-week, Thai Red Cross regimen, which involved administering four rabies vaccine doses intradermally over 4 weeks and infiltrating immunoglobulin into serious wounds, with the remainder injected into a distant muscle. In 2018, patients received three vaccine doses intradermally over 1 week, with a calculated amount of immunoglobulin infiltrated into wounds only. Remaining immunoglobulin was saved for other patients. The survival of patients bitten by apparently rabid dogs was used as a surrogate for effectiveness. FINDINGS: Despite treating 8.5% more patients in 2018 (5370 patients) than 2017 (4948 patients), 140 fewer ampoules of rabies vaccine and 436 fewer ampoules of rabies immunoglobulin were used, at a cost saving of 4202 United States dollars. Of 56 patients bitten by apparently rabid dogs, 50 were alive at 6-month follow-up. The remaining six patients could not be contacted but did not present to any hospital with rabies. CONCLUSION: The new regimen was more economical than the two-site, 4-week regimen and was equally effective. This regimen is recommended for preventing rabies in countries where the disease is endemic and rabies vaccine and immunoglobulin are in short supply.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Posexposición/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Rabia/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Atención Terciaria de Salud/economía , Adolescente , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pakistán , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía
2.
Euro Surveill ; 25(38)2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975188

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization (WHO) issued an updated position paper on rabies in 2018, mainly focusing on simplification of vaccination schedules and use of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG). The maximum amount of RIG anatomically feasible should be infiltrated exclusively in and around the wound and will no longer be calculated solely based on body weight. We describe the practical guideline implementing the revised RIG policy in the Netherlands on how to determine the amount of RIG for local administration. We calculated savings achieved through the revised WHO policy. We used information from a national database including rabies consultations in the Netherlands and clinical information from a public health service, clinical practitioners and national data on the amount of distributed RIG. Between 2008 and 2019, 5,164 consultations were registered. The most frequently affected anatomical location was hand or leg (43%). Around 80% concerned minor injuries (< 2 cm). From January 2016 to end December 2019, 7,361 mL RIG were distributed for 1,042 possible rabies exposures (EUR 1.4 million). Since implementing the revised policy, the amount of RIG distributed per order has sharply decreased (59%). Infiltrating RIG only locally saved large quantities of human RIG (EUR 1.1 million during 4 years) in the Netherlands.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Administración Tópica , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Política de Salud , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Rabia/epidemiología , Organización Mundial de la Salud
3.
Euro Surveill ; 25(38)2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975187

RESUMEN

BackgroundThe risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs.AimHere, we evaluated the costs and the cost-effectiveness of different pre- and post-exposure interventions in the Netherlands, taking into account the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the prevention of rabies.MethodsA decision tree-based economic model was constructed. We calculated and compared the cost of different WHO pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommendations, intramuscular vs intradermal vaccination and PEP subsequent to increased vaccination coverage in risk groups. We estimated cost-effectiveness, expressed as incremental costs per rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration averted, using a societal perspective. Statistical uncertainty regarding number of travellers and vaccination coverage was assessed.ResultsTotal costs at the national level were highest using previous WHO recommendations from 2012, estimated at EUR 15.4 million annually. Intradermal vaccinations in combination with the current recommendations led to the lowest costs, estimated at EUR 10.3 million. Higher vaccination uptake resulted in higher overall costs. The incremental costs per RIG administration averted varied from EUR 21,300-46,800.ConclusionsThe change in rabies PrEP and PEP recommendations in 2018 reduced total costs. Strategies with increased pre-travel vaccination uptake led to fewer RIG administrations and fewer vaccinations after exposure but also to higher total costs. Although larger scale intradermal administration of rabies vaccine can reduce total costs of PrEP and can positively influence vaccination uptake, it remains a costly intervention.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Posexposición/economía , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Virus de la Rabia/inmunología , Rabia/prevención & control , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Profilaxis Posexposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Rabia/inmunología , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/métodos
4.
Salud Publica Mex ; 62(3): 306-312, 2020.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520488

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze decision-making concerning stewardship and procurement mechanisms in the context of the Program for Prevention and Control of Human Rabies and the National Canine and Feline Vaccination Week in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The information was obtained through requests to the National Institute of Transparency, Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2017, 158.9 million doses of canine rabies vaccine (VAR-CF) were applied with an estimated budget of 1 915 million pesos. Our findings suggest weak stewardship and ineffective governance that allows monopolistic practices and fragmented and direct purchases. Prices for the same product vary discretionally between states and are significantly higher than those offered at international level. CONCLUSIONS: After 30 years of operation of the SNVA-C in Mexico, high prices of the VAR-CF persist, which are indicative of a significant market failure, characterized by zero competition, asymmetric information and misaligned incentive structures that precluded favorable price negotiation.


OBJETIVO: Analizar la rectoría y los mecanismos de procuración de insumos en el contexto del Programa de Acción Específico de Prevención y Control de la Rabia Humana y la Semana Nacional de Vacunación Antirrábica canina y felina en México (SNVA-C). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: La información se obtuvo mediante solicitudes al Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales. RESULTADOS: De 2009 a 2017 se aplicaron 158.9 millones de dosis de vacuna antirrábica canina y felina (VAR-CF) por un monto de compra aproximado de 1 915 MDP. Se documentó una débil rectoría que permite prácticas monopólicas y compras fragmentadas y directas. Las adquisiciones se han fincado con precios que varían entre entidades federativas y son significativamente más altos que los precios internacionales. CONCLUSIONES: Después de 30 años de operación de la SNVA-C en México, persisten pagos excesivos para la VAR-CF, los cuales son indicativos de una falla importante del mercado, caracterizada por nula competencia, información asimétrica y estructuras de incentivos desalineadas que impiden obtener un precio competitivo.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Rabia/veterinaria , Vacunación/veterinaria , Animales , Gatos , Perros , Competencia Económica , México , Rabia/prevención & control , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 321, 2019 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975098

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rabies remains a major public health problem in developing countries. Most fatal rabies cases, especially in children, result from dog bites and occur in low-income countries, such as those in Sub-Saharan Africa. Rabies can be controlled through mass dog vaccination and human deaths prevented through timely and appropriate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). As access to appropriate PEP remains a serious challenge for bite-victims, the aim of this study was to understand the use of PEP, to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices with respect to rabies and to identify risk factors related to non-compliance with PEP to define recommendations for improving PEP in Senegal. METHODS: This study included patients with suspicion of rabies exposure who sought PEP at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar from April 2013 to March 2014. Patients with rabies clinical symptoms, those who had already started PEP and those with exposure outside Senegal or for more than 3 months were excluded. Data on risk factors and propensity to seek and complete PEP were collected using questionnaires and phone interviews. The association between acceptability and compliance with PEP and other independent variables were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 905 patients enrolled into the study, 67% were male (sex ratio M/F, 2) and 46%, children under 15 years of age. Exposures by animal bites represented 87%, whereas the remainder were due to scratches or contact; 76% were classified as WHO category III and 88% were due to dogs. Among these patients, 7% refused to start PEP and 54.5% completed the full schedule. Main factors reported by non-compliant patients were vaccine costs and affordability, and knowledge on status of biting animal. CONCLUSION: This study shows that despite the awareness about rabies dangers and prevention, only half of the patients completed the full PEP schedule. The following recommendations, such as free of charge prophylaxis or intradermal regimens as an alternative to intramuscular regimens, should be considered to increase the adherence to PEP at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar and in Senegal.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Profilaxis Posexposición , Vacunas Antirrábicas/uso terapéutico , Rabia/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Profilaxis Posexposición/tendencias , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Senegal , Adulto Joven
6.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1398, 2019 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of a 90% reduction in neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) by 2030 requires innovative control strategies. This proof-of-concept study examined the effectiveness of integrating control programs for two NTDs: mass drug administration (MDA) for soil-transmitted helminths in humans and mass dog rabies vaccination (MDRV). METHODS: The study was carried out in 24 Tanzanian villages. The primary goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating community-wide MDA for STH and MDRV for rabies. The objectives were to investigate the popularity, participation and cost and time savings of integrated delivery, and to investigate the reach of the MDA with respect to primary school-aged children and other community members. To implement, we randomly allocated villages for delivery of MDA and MDRV (Arm A), MDA only (Arm B) or MDRV only (Arm C). RESULTS: Community support for the integrated delivery was strong (e.g. 85% of focus group discussions concluded that it would result in people getting "two for one" health treatments). A high proportion of households participated in the integrated Arm A events (81.7% MDA, 80.4% MDRV), and these proportions were similar to those in Arms B and C. These findings suggest that coverage might not be reduced when interventions are integrated. Moreover, in addition to time savings, integrated delivery resulted in a 33% lower cost per deworming dose and a 16% lower cost per rabies vaccination. The median percentage of enrolled primary school children treated by this study was 76%. However, because 37% of the primary school aged children that received deworming treatment were not enrolled in school, we hypothesize that the employed strategy could reach more school-aged children than would be reached through a solely school-based delivery strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated delivery platforms for health interventions can be feasible, popular, cost and time saving. The insights gained could be applicable in areas of sub-Saharan Africa that are remote or underserved by health services. These results indicate the utility of integrated One Health delivery platforms and suggest an important role in the global campaign to reduce the burden of NTDs, especially in hard-to-reach communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03667079 , retrospectively registered 11th September 2018.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Helmintiasis/prevención & control , Rabia/prevención & control , Suelo/parasitología , Animales , Niño , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Perros , Helmintiasis/transmisión , Humanos , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos/economía , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Vacunación Masiva/veterinaria , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Rabia/transmisión , Rabia/veterinaria , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Población Rural , Tanzanía/epidemiología
7.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 53(8): 804-810, 2019 Aug 06.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378040

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of different immunization strategies for rabies in China, and to provide a reference for determining the optimal immunization strategy. Methods: The system dynamics model was used to simulate the epidemic of canine rabies and a decision tree model was conducted to analysis different immune strategies. Relevant probabilities were obtained through literature search and on-site investigation. Sensitivity analysis was used to explore the important influenced factors. Results: At baseline, from a social perspective, 70% vaccination of dogs was the optimal strategy compared to current vaccination strategy (43% vaccination in dogs, human category-Ⅱ exposure vaccination/category-Ⅲ exposure vaccination combined with RIG). The total cost was 14 084 354 CNY, and the total utility value was 22 078 616.23 QALYs, and the incremental cost-utility ratio was-62 148 147 CNY/QALY; if human vaccination was considered, 55% vaccination of dogs combined with strategy one was the optimal strategy, its incremental cost-utility ratio was-444 620 557 CNY/QALY. The probability that an injured dog carries rabies virus was the most sensitive parameter. When it was greater than 0.005 03, strategy four was the optimal strategy. When it was less than 82/100 000, strategy one was the optimal strategy; when it was between 82/100 000 and 120/100 000, strategy two was the optimal strategy; when it was between 120/100 000 and 503/100 000, strategy two was the optimal strategy. Conclusion: It was conducive to increase the vaccination coverage of canine for the prevention and control of rabies.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacunas Antirrábicas/uso terapéutico , Rabia/prevención & control , Animales , China , Árboles de Decisión , Perros , Humanos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Rabia/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Vacunación
8.
Indian J Public Health ; 63(Supplement): S44-S47, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31603091

RESUMEN

The expenditure for rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is substantial, especially for the poor who are affected the most. The present study was conducted to determine the cost incurred to a patient and the healthcare facility for providing PEP in different healthcare settings. A multicentric, health facility-based study was conducted from May 2017 to January 2018 in the six states involving 18 healthcare facilities. The study included 529 animal bite cases; most of them belonged to either category III (54.4%) or category II (43.1%) exposures and all of them received complete PEP. The total median cost incurred to the patients for complete PEP in the government health facility was INR 1400 (USD 22) and in private hospitals was INR 3685 (USD 58). The cost of PEP for the bite victims is considerable; therefore, it has to be provided free of charge at all healthcare facilities.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Posexposición/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Mordeduras y Picaduras/epidemiología , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Público/economía , Rabia/epidemiología
9.
Rev Sci Tech ; 37(2): 681-689, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30747117

RESUMEN

Rabies is an economically important zoonosis. This paper describes the extent of the economic impacts of the disease and some of the types of economic analyses used to understand those impacts, as well as the trade-offs between efforts to manage rabies and efforts to eliminate it. In many cases, the elimination of rabies proves more cost-effective over time than the continual administration of postexposure prophylaxis, animal testing and animal vaccination. Economic analyses are used to inform and drive policy decisions and focus political will, placing economics at the heart of rabies control.


La rage est une zoonose importante au plan économique. Les auteurs décrivent la portée de l'impact économique de la rage et présentent quelques modèles d'analyse économique utilisés pour comprendre ces effets ; ils analysent également les compromis à trouver entre les efforts consacrés à la gestion de la rage et ceux dédiés à son élimination. Dans bien des cas, il est plus rentable sur le long terme d'éliminer la rage que de procéder à la gestion continue de la prophylaxie post-exposition chez l'homme et au dépistage et à la vaccination des animaux. Les analyses économiques servent à documenter et à orienter les décisions concernant les mesures à prendre afin de mobiliser la volonté politique nécessaire, en plaçant l'économie au coeur de la lutte contre la rage.


La rabia es una zoonosis que reviste importancia económica. Los autores exponen la magnitud del impacto económico de la enfermedad y algunas de las modalidades de análisis económico utilizadas para aprehender esas consecuencias, así como el juego de equilibrios entre las medidas de gestión de la rabia y las actividades destinadas a eliminarla. En muchos casos, la eliminación de la enfermedad ofrece a la larga mayor eficacia, en relación con el costo, que la continua labor de administración de profilaxis tras exposición, realización de pruebas en animales y vacunación de estos. Los análisis económicos sirven para fundamentar y encauzar las decisiones de planificación y para aglutinar la voluntad política, haciendo de los aspectos económicos un eje de la lucha contra la rabia.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Política , Vacunas Antirrábicas/inmunología , Rabia/veterinaria , Animales , Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades de los Perros/economía , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Humanos , Rabia/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Zoonosis
12.
Bull World Health Organ ; 95(3): 210-219C, 2017 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28250534

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety and immunogenicity of pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis (including accelerated schedules, co-administration with other vaccines and booster doses), its cost-effectiveness and recommendations for use, particularly in high-risk settings. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for papers on pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis published between 2007 and 29 January 2016. We reviewed field data from pre-exposure prophylaxis campaigns in Peru and the Philippines. FINDINGS: Pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis was safe and immunogenic in children and adults, also when co-administered with routine childhood vaccinations and the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. The evidence available indicates that shorter regimens and regimens involving fewer doses are safe and immunogenic and that booster intervals could be extended up to 10 years. The few studies on cost suggest that, at current vaccine and delivery costs, pre-exposure prophylaxis campaigns would not be cost-effective in most situations. Although pre-exposure prophylaxis has been advocated for high-risk populations, only Peru and the Philippines have implemented appropriate national programmes. In the future, accelerated regimens and novel vaccines could simplify delivery and increase affordability. CONCLUSION: Pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis is safe and immunogenic and should be considered: (i) where access to postexposure prophylaxis is limited or delayed; (ii) where the risk of exposure is high and may go unrecognized; and (iii) where controlling rabies in the animal reservoir is difficult. Pre-exposure prophylaxis should not distract from canine vaccination efforts, provision of postexposure prophylaxis or education to increase rabies awareness in local communities.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Factores de Edad , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras/virología , Quirópteros , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Perros , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Esquemas de Inmunización , Modelos Econométricos , Perú , Filipinas , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 160(2): 91-100, 2014 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24592494

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The annual mortality rate of human rabies in rural Africa is 3.6 deaths per 100 000 persons. Rabies can be prevented with prompt postexposure prophylaxis, but this is costly and often inaccessible in rural Africa. Because 99% of human exposures occur through rabid dogs, canine vaccination also prevents transmission of rabies to humans. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rabies control through annual canine vaccination campaigns in rural sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN: We model transmission dynamics in dogs and wildlife and assess empirical uncertainty in the biological variables to make probability-based evaluations of cost-effectiveness. DATA SOURCES: Epidemiologic variables from a contact-tracing study and literature and cost data from ongoing vaccination campaigns. TARGET POPULATION: Two districts of rural Tanzania: Ngorongoro and Serengeti. TIME HORIZON: 10 years. PERSPECTIVE: Health policymaker. INTERVENTION: Vaccination coverage ranging from 0% to 95% in increments of 5%. OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-years for health outcomes and 2010 U.S. dollars for economic outcomes. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Annual canine vaccination campaigns were very cost-effective in both districts compared with no canine vaccination. In Serengeti, annual campaigns with as much as 70% coverage were cost-saving. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Across a wide range of variable assumptions and levels of societal willingness to pay for life-years, the optimal vaccination coverage for Serengeti was 70%. In Ngorongoro, although optimal coverage depended on willingness to pay, vaccination campaigns were always cost-effective and lifesaving and therefore preferred. LIMITATION: Canine vaccination was very cost-effective in both districts, but there was greater uncertainty about the optimal coverage in Ngorongoro. CONCLUSION: Annual canine rabies vaccination campaigns conferred extraordinary value and dramatically reduced the health burden of rabies. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Perros/transmisión , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Vacunación/economía , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras/complicaciones , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Perros , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/transmisión , Rabia/veterinaria , Población Rural , Tanzanía/epidemiología
14.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 45(5): 1048-52, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25417505

RESUMEN

Courses of post-exposure rabies vaccination in clinical practice are often not administered completely. If suspected animals are still alive after 10 days of observation, full post-exposure vaccination will usually be withheld from bite victims. In this study, we compared the cost differences between complete and incomplete courses of post-exposure rabies vaccination. The cost calculations were based on the principle that all patients will have at least one more animal bite in the future. Costs were compared between patients who received post-exposure rabies vaccination and if they completed or did not complete the vaccine regimen. In this study, 46.7% of 372 patients completed the full course of five doses of the rabies vaccine. Based on the study rationale, complete vaccination would save nation budget 224,700 Baht for WHO wound category 2, 801,474 Baht for WHO wound category 3 with equine rabies immunoglobulin treatment, and 2,618,916 Baht for WHO wound category 3 with human rabies immunoglobulin treatment. Physicians should encourage complete courses of post-exposure rabies vaccination to save further costs from animal bites in the future.


Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras/terapia , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Rabia/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos
15.
East Afr Med J ; 89(2): 59-63, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26845813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rabies is a serious neglected disease which occurs worldwide. In urban areas, the control of the diseaseis expected to be hampered by several unique constraints. OBJECTIVE: To appraise the occurrence and control of rabies. STUDY DESIGN: The tools used in the study included key informant interviews with senior veterinary and medical officers and a questionnaire survey on 15 veterinary officers and 9 human physicians. The occurrence of animal bites and costs involved in treatment was also investigated using retrospective hospital data for the year 2007. SETTING: Kisumu Municipality, Kenya. RESULTS: The control of rabies was under the Veterinary Department through dog vaccinations and baiting, and also under the Department of Public Health (DPH) through people vaccinations and post exposure treatments. The constraints observed were poor coordination in rabies control efforts, understaffing and limited resources. Animal bites were common with 1270 cases reported during 2007. The post-bite rabies vaccines were mainly purchased from local chemists at KES 7,500 per full dose. This amounted to an annual total cost of KES 9,525,000 (136,071 USD). The bites were mainly from domestic dogs (89%) and occurred commonly in highly populated areas. The mean age of people with bites was 21 (2.5 - 78) years, showing that young people had a higher risk. Males (59%) were at higher risk of bites than females (41%). CONCLUSIONS: It would be important for the relevant departments to harmonise their rabies control strategies and also address the prevalent constraints by using local networks. The incidence of rabies and the associated epidemiology needs proper updated documentation with a view of carrying out mass vaccination of dogs at times free of cost to the economically disadvantaged owners.


Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras/epidemiología , Perros , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras/economía , Mordeduras y Picaduras/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Kenia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mascotas , Prevalencia , Rabia/economía , Rabia/transmisión , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/economía
16.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(7): 792-4, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21734465

RESUMEN

Rabies is a virtually 100% fatal acute viral encephalitis. Rabies occurs in more than 150 countries and territories. Globally there are 17.4 million animal bite cases and more than 55,000 deaths annually. India's 20,000 deaths accounts for 36% of global and 65% of the Asian (31,000) deaths. The Intradermal Rabies Vaccine (IDRV) was first started in Thailand in 1984. In 1992, World Health Organization approved it for use in developing countries which face a shortage of rabies vaccine due to paucity of funds. Vaccines like Purified Vero cell vaccine (PVRV), Purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV) and Human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV) that can be injected by the intradermal route for Post Exposure Prophylaxis as approved by WHO. The regimen approved by the WHO/DCGI India is the Updated Thai Red Cross Regimen, which involves injection of 0.1 mL of reconstituted vaccine per ID site and on two such ID site per visit on Days 0, 3, 7 and 28 (2-2-2-0-2). All reconstituted vaccine unused at the end of 6-8 h must be discarded. The ID route is ideal in terms of economic benefits, safety and efficacy. This reduces the cost of vaccination by about 68%, which is clearly an attractive option for resource-starved countries like India.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Rabia/prevención & control , Anticuerpos Antivirales/biosíntesis , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Rabia/economía , Rabia/inmunología , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/inmunología , Virus de la Rabia/inmunología
17.
Prev Vet Med ; 196: 105471, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509773

RESUMEN

Access to veterinary services can have positive impacts on animal health and welfare, and on human mental and physical health and well-being; however, many communities worldwide lack access to such services. At their request, the 5 communities of the Sahtu Settlement Area, Northwest Territories, Canada, have received annual access to preventive veterinary services through the University of Calgary's Northern Community Health Rotation since 2008. To determine the reach of the program, we conducted a dog census in 2017. We then conducted a chart review of 11 years of dog medical records from 2008 to 2018 to evaluate how the reach of the program, the uptake of veterinary services, and dog population demographics, health and welfare measures changed over the duration of the program. In the chart review, we used either multi-level logistic regression or generalized linear models, to determine how seven variables, including age, sex, breed, body condition, deworming, vaccination, and sterilization status upon clinic entry, changed over the course of program delivery. Our results suggest that program reach, veterinary service uptake, and dog demographic, health and welfare measures improved over time. We observed high rabies vaccination coverage in some communities (48 %-83 % of the dog population) and moderate overall sterilization status (25 %-56 % of the dog population) with female dog sterilization more common than male (75 % of dogs leaving the 2017 clinics, compared to 43 %). Several dog demographic, health, and welfare measures, including age, body condition, and vaccination, deworming, and sterilization status, were significantly better in later years of the program (all p < 0.001). Differences among communities, both in dog population numbers from the 2017 census (40-89 dogs) and in the uptake of veterinary services in 2017 (48 %-83 % of the dog population), were notable. Vaccination uptake was directly related to clinic attendance, but sterilization was impacted by additional factors, including community members' acceptance of the procedure. Some unintended consequences were noted, however, including the potential effect of sterilization on the availability of traditional dog breeds in the communities. Overall, our study findings demonstrate that subsidized veterinary services provided over a regular and extended period of time benefit animal population demographics, health and welfare, and could have positive impacts on human well-being. The framework of community collaboration and long-term commitment developed through this program serves as a model for achieving common health goals among communities in need and veterinary service providers.


Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal , Enfermedades de los Perros , Vacunación , Medicina Veterinaria/economía , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Femenino , Masculino , Territorios del Noroeste , Salud Pública , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/veterinaria
18.
Acta Trop ; 216: 105787, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33385361

RESUMEN

Despite declaration as a national priority disease, dog rabies remains endemic in Liberia, with surveillance systems and disease control activities still developing. The objective of these initial efforts was to establish animal rabies diagnostics, foster collaboration between all rabies control stakeholders, and develop a short-term action plan with estimated costs for rabies control and elimination in Liberia. Four rabies diagnostic tests, the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test, the direct immunohistochemical test (dRIT), the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay and the rapid immunochromatographic diagnostic test (RIDT), were implemented at the Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL) in Monrovia between July 2017 and February 2018. Seven samples (n=7) out of eight suspected animals were confirmed positive for rabies lyssavirus, and molecular analyses revealed that all isolates belonged to the Africa 2 lineage, subgroup H. During a comprehensive in-country One Health rabies stakeholder meeting in 2018, a practical workplan, a short-term action plan and an accurately costed mass dog vaccination strategy were developed. Liberia is currently at stage 1.5/5 of the Stepwise Approach towards Rabies Elimination (SARE) tool, which corresponds with countries that are scaling up local-level interventions (e.g. dog vaccination campaigns) to the national level. Overall an estimated 5.3 - 8 million USD invested over 13 years is needed to eliminate rabies in Liberia by 2030. Liberia still has a long road to become free from dog-rabies. However, the dialogue between all relevant stakeholders took place, and disease surveillance considerably improved through implementing rabies diagnosis at the CVL. The joint efforts of diverse national and international stakeholders laid important foundations to achieve the goal of zero dog-mediated human rabies deaths by 2030.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/veterinaria , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Rabia/diagnóstico , Rabia/prevención & control , Animales , ADN Viral , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Perros/virología , Perros/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Liberia/epidemiología , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva/veterinaria , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/veterinaria , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Virus de la Rabia/genética , Virus de la Rabia/aislamiento & purificación
19.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 12476, 2021 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127783

RESUMEN

Dog vaccination is a cost-effective approach to preventing human rabies deaths. In Haiti, the last nation-wide dog vaccination campaign occurred in 2018. We estimated the number of human lives that could be saved by resuming dog vaccination in 2021 compared to 2022 and compared the cost-effectiveness of these two scenarios. We modified a previously published rabies transmission and economic model to estimate trends in dog and human rabies cases in Haiti from 2005 to 2025, with varying assumptions about when dog vaccinations resume. We compared model outputs to surveillance data on human rabies deaths from 2005 to 2020 and animal rabies cases from 2018 to 2020. Model predictions and surveillance data both suggest a 5- to 8-fold increase in animal rabies cases occurred in Haiti's capital city between Fall 2019 and Fall 2020. Restarting dog vaccination in Haiti in 2021 compared to 2022 could save 285 human lives and prevent 6541 human rabies exposures over a five-year period. It may also decrease program costs due to reduced need for human post-exposure prophylaxis. These results show that interruptions in dog vaccination campaigns before elimination is achieved can lead to significant human rabies epidemics if not promptly resumed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Profilaxis Posexposición/economía , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Rabia/prevención & control , Animales , Ciudades/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Perros/transmisión , Enfermedades de los Perros/virología , Perros , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Haití/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Modelos Económicos , Profilaxis Posexposición/organización & administración , Profilaxis Posexposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Rabia/mortalidad , Rabia/transmisión , Rabia/veterinaria , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA