Infraclavicular, Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Approach to the Axillary Artery for Arterial Catheter Placement: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery is noninferior to an ultrasound-guided cannulation of the common femoral artery for arterial catheter placement in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, investigator-initiated, noninferiority randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated ICU in Poland. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated patients with indications for arterial catheter placement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the axillary group (A group), an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular, in-plane cannulation of the axillary artery was performed. In the femoral group (F group), an ultrasound-guided, out-of-plane cannulation of the common femoral artery was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,079 mechanically ventilated patients were screened, of whom 110 were randomized. The main outcome was the cannulation success rate. The secondary outcomes included the artery puncture success rate, the first-pass success rate, number of attempts required to puncture, and the rate of early mechanical complications. The cannulation success rate in the A group and F group was 96.4% and 96.3%, respectively. The lower limit of 95% CI for the difference in cannulation success rate was above the prespecified noninferiority margin of-7% demonstrating noninferiority of infraclavicular approach. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of puncture success rate and the rate of early mechanical complications. CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery is noninferior to the cannulation of the common femoral artery in terms of procedure success rate. We found no significant differences in early mechanical complications between the groups.

Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization around the neck: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization (CVC) has become the standard of care. However, providers use a variety of approaches, encompassing the internal jugular vein (IJV), supraclavicular subclavian vein (SupraSCV), infraclavicular subclavian vein (InfraSCV), proximal axillary vein (ProxiAV), distal axillary vein (DistalAV), and femoral vein. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to compare the first-pass success rate and arterial puncture rate for different approaches to ultrasound-guided CVC above the diaphragm. METHODS: In May 2023, Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the 5 CVC approaches. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool was used to assess confidence. Thirteen RCTs (4418 participants and 13 comparisons) were included in this review. RESULTS: The SupraSCV approach likely increased the proportion of first-attempt successes compared to the other 4 approaches. The SupraSCV first-attempt success demonstrated risk ratios (RRs) > 1.21 with a lower 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeding 1. Compared to the IJV, the SupraSCV approach likely increased the first-attempt success proportion (RR 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.40, moderate confidence), whereas the DistalAV approach reduced it (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.87, high confidence). Artery puncture had little to no difference across all approaches (low to high confidence). CONCLUSION: Considering first-attempt success and mechanical complications, the SupraSCV may emerge as the preferred approach, while DistalAV might be the least preferable approach. Nevertheless, head-to-head studies comparing the approaches with the greatest first attempt success should be undertaken.

Case series of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in young children: A new approach to the axillary vein.

BACKGROUND: We have developed a new approach for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion that we think has several advantages, including ease of insertion, access to a larger vein and patient comfort. METHODS: In this case series report, the first 19 cases were audited. RESULTS: All PICCs were inserted without complications; 17 on the first attempt. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the novel approach to the axillary vein for PICC insertion is feasible and appears to be safe when performed by an experienced operator.

Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture (IPUS-AVP) for venous access in implantation of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is uncommon due to the lack of clinical evidence supporting this technique. This study investigated the efficacy and early complications of IPUS-AVP compared to the standard method using cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) for CIED implantation. METHODS: ACCESS was an investigator-led, interventional, randomized (1:1 ratio), monocentric, controlled superiority trial. A total of 200 patients undergoing CIED implantation were randomized to IPUS-AVP (n = 101) or CVC (n = 99) as a first assigned route. The primary endpoint was the success rate of insertion of all leads using the first assigned venous access technique. The secondary endpoints were time to venous access, total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, X-ray exposure, and complications. Complications were monitored during a follow-up period of three months after procedure. RESULTS: IPUS-AVP was significantly superior to CVC for the primary endpoint with 100 (99.0%) vs. 86 (86.9%) procedural successes (P = .001). Cephalic vein cutdown followed by subclavian vein puncture was successful in a total of 95 (96.0%) patients, P = .21 vs. IPUS-AVP. All secondary endpoints were also significantly improved in the IPUS-AVP group with reduction in time to venous access [3.4 vs. 10.6 min, geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.32 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.28-0.36), P < .001], total procedure duration [33.8 vs. 46.9 min, GMR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), P < .001], fluoroscopy time [2.4 vs. 3.3 min, GMR 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.86), P < .001], and X-ray exposure [1083 vs. 1423 mGy.cm², GMR 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.93), P = .009]. There was no significant difference in complication rates between groups (P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: IPUS-AVP is superior to CVC in terms of success rate, time to venous access, procedure duration, and radiation exposure. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture should be a recommended venous access technique for CIED implantation.

Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Axillary Vein Versus Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This clinical trial aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided in-plane infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary vein (AXV) and the ultrasound-guided out-of-plane cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV). DESIGN: A prospective, single-blinded, open label, parallel-group, randomized trial. SETTING: Two university-affiliated ICUs in Poland (Opole and Lublin). PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated intensive care patients with clinical indications for central venous line placement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the IJV group ( n = 304) and AXV group ( n = 306). The primary outcome was to compare the IJV group and AXV group through the venipuncture and catheterization success rates. Secondary outcomes were catheter tip malposition and early mechanical complication rates. All catheterizations were performed by advanced residents and consultants in anesthesiology and intensive care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The IJV puncture rate was 100%, and the AXV was 99.7% (chi-square, p = 0.19). The catheterization success rate in the IJV group was 98.7% and 96.7% in the AXV group (chi-square, p = 0.11). The catheter tip malposition rate was 9.9% in the IJV group and 10.1% in the AXV group (chi-square, p = 0.67). The early mechanical complication rate in the IJV group was 3% (common carotid artery puncture-4 cases, perivascular hematoma-2 cases, vertebral artery puncture-1 case, pneumothorax-1 case) and 2.6% in the AXV group (axillary artery puncture-4 cases, perivascular hematoma-4 cases) (chi-square, p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between the real-time ultrasound-guided out-of-plane cannulation of the IJV and the infraclavicular real-time ultrasound-guided in-plane cannulation of the AXV. Both techniques are equally efficient and safe in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

A surgical method to be reminded for the treatment of symptomatic ipsilateral central venous occlusions in patients with hemodialysis access: Axillo-axillary venous bypass case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: In this case report, we present two chronic hemodialysis patients with upper extremity swelling due to central venous occlusions together with their clinical presentation, surgical management and brief review of the literature. METHODS: The first patient who was a 63-year-old female patient with a history of multiple bilateral arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) was referred to our clinic. Physical examination demonstrated a functioning right brachio-cephalic AVF, with severe edema of the right arm, dilated venous collaterals, facial edema, and unilateral breast enlargement. In her history, multiple ipsilateral subclavian venous catheterizations were present for sustaining temporary hemodialysis access. The second patient was a 47-year-old male with a history of failed renal transplant, CABG surgery, multiple AV fistula procedures from both extremities, leg amputation caused by peripheral arterial disease, and decreased myocardial functions. He was receiving 3/7 hemodialysis and admitted to our clinic with right arm edema, accompanied by pain, stiffness, and skin hyperpigmentation symptoms ipsilateral to a functioning brachio-basilic AVF. He was not able to flex his arms, elbow, or wrist due to severe edema. RESULTS: Venography revealed right subclavian vein stenosis with patent contralateral central veins in the first patient. She underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) twice with subsequent re-occlusions. After failed attempts of PTA, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass in order to preserve the AV access function. In second patient, venography revealed right subclavian vein occlusion caused secondary to the subclavian venous catheters. Previous attempts for percutaneously crossing the chronic subclavian lesion failed multiple times by different centers. Hence, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass surgery. CONCLUSION: In case of chronic venous occlusions, endovascular procedures may be ineffective. Since preserving the vascular access function is crucial in this particular patient population, venous bypass procedures should be kept in mind as an alternative for central venous reconstruction, before deciding on ligation and relocation of the AVF.

High success rates of ultrasound-guided distal internal jugular vein and axillary vein approaches for central venous catheterization: A randomized controlled open-label pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein (AV) catheterization has been considered as the preferred site of insertion to minimize catheter-related infections. Given its difficulty of realization, internal jugular vein (IJV) access remains, thus, the first choice of catheter insertion site. This descriptive study was aimed to assess the success and complication rates of in-plane short axis approach of IJV in the lower neck and the AV approach under US-guidance. METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled open-label pilot trial, all patients requiring central venous catheterization (CVC) in intensive care unit or operating room were randomly assigned to low IJV or AV groups. The primary objective was to estimate the overall success rate of both approaches. The secondary objectives were immediate complication rates, procedure durations, success rate after the first puncture, late complication rates (i.e., thrombosis, catheter colonization, and catheter-related infections), and nurse satisfaction regarding insertion site dressings. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three out of two hundred and ten included patients were fully analyzed (90 and 83 in the IJV and AV approach groups, respectively). Overall success rates for IJV and AV sites were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) [90-99]) and 89% (95% CI [81-94]) respectively. First puncture success rates were 90% and 80% respectively. The median overall procedure duration from US pre-procedural screening to guidewire insertion was 8 and 10 min in IJV and AV groups. Overall immediate complications rates for IJV and AV sites were 11.6% and 14.6%, respectively. Incidence of catheter colonization were 7.9% and 6.8% and catheter-related infection rate were 2.6% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, US-guided low IJV and AV approaches are safe and efficient techniques for CVC insertion associated with high success and low complications rates. Duration for guidewire insertion seemed to be shorter in the short axis in-plane IJV approach. It provides the basis for a future randomized trial comparing these two approaches.

UltraSound Axillary Vein Access (USAA): Learning curve and randomized comparison to traditional venous access for cardiac device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques exist for venous access (VA) during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the learning curve with ultrasound (US) guided axillary vein access (USAA). METHODS: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing CIED implantation. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to USAA versus conventional VA techniques. The primary outcomes were the success rates, VA times and 30-day complication rates. RESULTS: The study included 100 patients (age 68 ± 14 years, BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m2 ). USAA was successful in 66/70 implants (94%). Initial attempts at conventional VA included 47% axillary (n = 14), 30% (n = 9) cephalic, and 23% (n = 7) subclavian. The median access time was longer for USAA than conventional access (8.3 IQR 4.2-15.3 min vs. 5.2 IQR 3.4-8.6 min, p = .009). Among the five inexperienced USAA implanters, there was a significant improvement in median access time from first to last tertile of USAA implants (17.0 IQR 7.0-21.0 min to 8.6 IQR 4.5-10.8 min, p = .038). The experienced USAA implanter had similar access times with USAA compared with conventional access (4.0 IQR 3.3-4.7 min vs. 5.2 IQR 3.4-8.6 min, p = .15). Venograms were less common with USAA than conventional access (2% vs. 33%, p < .0001). The 30-day complication rate was similar with USAA (n = 4/70, 6%) versus conventional (n = 3/30, 10%, p = .44). CONCLUSION: Although the success rate with USAA was high, there was a significant learning curve. Once experienced with the USAA technique, there is the potential for reduced complications without adding to the procedure duration.

Axillary vein thrombosis 30 h after caesarean section: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Axillary vein thrombosis is a very rare disorder. However, a case of axillary vein thrombosis shortly after caesarean section has not been reported previously. We report a case of axillary vein thrombosis 30 h after caesarean section due to an unidentified aetiology. CASE: A 37-year-old multiparous woman developed swelling and pain of the forearm and hand 30 h after undergoing a caesarean section. Doppler ultrasonography revealed a 14.9 mm × 5.3 mm thrombosis in the left axillary vein although a prophylaxis of anticoagulation was administrated. After an adjusted-dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was administered, the patient recovered and was discharged. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians should be fully aware of the possibility of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) despite its rarity, especially after the surgery. Lying in the lateral decubitus position for long periods postoperatively should be avoided as much as possible.

Ultrasound guided axillary vein access: An alternative approach to venous access for cardiac device implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound guided axillary vein access (UGAVA) is an emerging approach for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation not widely utilized. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective, age and sex-matched cohort study of CIED implantation from January 2017 to July 2019 comparing UGAVA before incision to venous access obtained after incision without ultrasound (conventional). The study population included 561 patients (187 with attempted UGAVA, 68 ± 13 years old, 43% women, body mass index (BMI) 30 ± 8 kg/m2 , 15% right-sided, 43% implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, 15% upgrades). UGAVA was successful in 178/187 patients (95%). In nine patients where UGAVA was abandoned, the vein was too deep for access before incision. BMI was higher in abandoned patients than successful UGAVA (38 ± 6 vs. 28 ± 6 kg/m2 , p < .0001). Median time from local anesthetic to completion of UGAVA was 7 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-10) and median procedure time 61 min (IQR: 50-92). UGAVA changed implant laterality in two patients (avoiding an extra incision in both) and could have prevented unnecessary incision in four conventional patients. Excluding device upgrades, there was reduced fluoroscopy time in UGAVA versus conventional (4 vs. 6 min; IQR: 2-5 vs. 4-9; p < .001). Thirty-day complications were similar in UGAVA versus conventional (n = 7 vs. 26, 4 vs. 7%; p = .13, p = .41 adjusting for upgrades), partly driven by a trend towards reduced pneumothorax (n = 0 vs. 3, 0 vs. 1%; p = .22). CONCLUSIONS: UGAVA is a safe approach for CIED implantation and helps prevent an extra incision if a barrier is identified changing laterality preincision.

Utility of Caudal Angulation for Venous Access under Fluoroscopic Guidance during Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Axillary venous access is preferred for CIED implantation. The procedure is usually performed under fluoroscopic guidance in anteroposterior (A-P) view. However, there is a lack of perception of depth in this view with a fear of creating complications. Caudal fluoroscopy (adding 30°-35° caudal angulation to A-P projection) has been proposed to circumvent this problem. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate the advantages of caudal fluoroscopy using fluoroscopic images, contrast venograms, and CT angiography images of axillary vein. METHODS: The fluoroscopic images and contrast venograms obtained in the A-P view were compared with caudal fluoroscopy in patients undergoing CIED implantation at our centre. Also, the CT angiography images of axillary vein were reconstructed to understand the relative anatomy of the vein and the underlying lung parenchyma, simulating these 2 projections. RESULTS: The CT angiography images, contrast venograms, and fluoroscopic images confirmed that caudal fluoroscopy allows better visualization of the vein in relation to the lung parenchyma and rib cage. Analysis of fluoroscopic images revealed that the bend of the first rib formed a conical prominence in caudal fluoroscopy. This served as an important bony landmark for successful venous access, which was usually obtained while the needle was being directed towards this prominence in caudal fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed advantages of caudal fluoroscopy for CIED implantation have been elucidated by analysis of CT angiography images, contrast venograms, and fluoroscopic images.

Late Basilic Vein Superficialization Combined with Revision Using Distal Inflow (RUDI) Operation to Treat a Symptomatic High Flow Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Vascular access (VA)-related high flows (HF) are common with brachial artery based fistulas. Flow-reduction procedures are indicated in symptomatic patients or asymptomatic ones with flows >2 L/min. However concomitant issues increase their complexity. We describe a case of a patient suffering congestive heart failure as a result of HF brachial-basilic fistula >3 L/min. A simultaneous late basilic vein transposition and revision using distal inflow (RUDI) was performed. METHODS: A large diameter untransposed arterialized basilic vein was carefully and completely mobilized up to the proximal upper arm. After harvesting an autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) segment, a new inflow anastomosis was performed in the proximal ulnar artery. At the final stage, and after tunneling the mobilizing basilic vein in a subcutaneous semicircular configuration, an end-to-end anastomosis joining the two stumps (basilic vein outflow portion and GSV inflow arterial portion) was performed. A decision-making process in order to reach this complex option is discussed. Results Access flow and cardiac output were greatly attenuated following our approach. After a mean follow-up of 9 months no VA complications were observed, with flow still detected below 2 L/min. All cardiac symptoms and ultrasound investigations improved. CONCLUSION: Multiple VA issues including HF pose a risk for abandonment and a challenge for the vascular surgeon. An effort toward increasing the "upper extremity life span" is advised.

Conversion of Arterio-Venous Access of Hemodialysis to Arterio-Arterial Access for Treatment of Venous hypertension with Central Venous Occlusion.

This report describes conversion of arterio-venous graft or fistula to arterio-arterial vascular access as a new surgical treatment option for central venous occlusion. It starts with control of the axillary vein and the synthetic graft or superficialized vein proximally, the suture line of venous anastomosis is closed and end-to-side anastomosis of the synthetic graft or vein to the brachial artery (BA) is done, then ligation of the BA distal to the anastomosis is done. Now the blood flow is directed through synthetic graft or vein from proximal to distal BA that can be used as arterio-arterial vascular access for hemodialysis.

A Rare Case of Dysplastic Axillary Artery Aneurysm Associated with Arteriovenous Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Axillary artery aneurysms are rare conditions, and their causes are various. They can determine severe complications, so the treatment is extremely important. METHODS: We report the case of a young man affected by a saccular axillary artery aneurysm associated with intramuscular arteriovenous malformation, without symptoms except for the presence of a pulsatile mass. Duplex scan and computed tomography scan have been essential for a correct diagnosis and planning of the treatment. At first, the patient was submitted to coil embolization of an efferent vessel, and then he was treated surgically through ligation and detachment of the aneurysm and replacement of part of the axillary artery with a Dacron graft (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland, UK). RESULTS: Follow-up at 1 and 6 months revealed normal patency of the axillary arterty and the prosthetic graft with complete exclusion and thrombosis of the aneurysm sac.No sensitive nor motor deficit were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms of the axillary artery associated with intramuscular arteriovenous malformations are very rare, but have to be suspected. The treatment is challenging and can be surgical, endovascular, or hybrid, based on the patient's conditions and aneurysm's anatomical features.

Pre-anaesthesia ultrasonography of the subclavian/infraclavicular axillary vein for predicting hypotension after inducing general anaesthesia: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Bedside sonography of the inferior vena cava has been demonstrated to be a reliable tool for assessing intravascular volume status. Subclavian vein (SCV) assessment was proposed as a reasonable adjunct for measuring the inferior vena cava. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the preoperative diameter and collapsibility index of the SCV or the infraclavicular axillary vein could predict the incidence of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Adults scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTION: Sonographic evaluation of the SCV or the axillary vein (SCV-AV) before induction of anaesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the association between the SCV-AV measurements (diameter an collapsibility index) and intra-operative hypotension (IOH) after induction of anaesthesia. RESULTS: Patients who developed IOH had a higher collapsibility index of the SCV-AV during spontaneous breathing (P = 0.009) and deep inspiration (P = 0.002). After adjusting for confounding variables, the collapsibility index of the SCV-AV during spontaneous breathing was not a significant predictor of a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) after inducing anaesthesia (P = 0.127), whereas the collapsibility index of the SCV-AV during deep inspiration was a significant predictor (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The collapsibility index of the SCV-AV during deep inspiration was a significant predictor of IOH occurrence and the percentage decrease in MAP after inducing anaesthesia. Further studies in patients with higher collapsibility index are needed to confirm our findings, before the collapsibility index of the SCV-AV can be recommended unequivocally for clinical use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on 8 September 2017 at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp; Identifier: KCT0001078KCT0002457), and the first patient was enrolled on 14 October 2017.

Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

INTRODUCTION: The most widespread venous sites of access for implantation intravenous implantable cardiac electronic device (CIED) are the cephalic and subclavian vein. Fluoroscopy-guided axillary venous access is an alternative, but efficacy and safety have not been studied under equal conditions. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided axillary vs cephalic vein access in CIED implant. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and forty patients were randomized to receive CIED implantation by the fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access. The implantation success, the procedure times and the complications were recorded. A comparison of the results of operators was made. The success rate of the randomized venous access was superior in the axillary group than in cephalic (98.3% vs 76.7%, P < .001). Time to access (6.8 ± 3.1 minute vs 13.1 ± 5.8 minutes, P < .001) and implantation duration was significantly shorter in the axillary group than in the cephalic group (42.3 ± 11.6 minutes vs 50.5 ± 13.3 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of complication and inter-operator success rate, complications rate and time to access. CONCLUSION: The fluoroscopy-guided axillary venous access is safe and has a better success rate and faster execution time compared with the cephalic vein access. When the results were compared among the study operators, neither in the axillary nor in the cephalic group there were differences in the success rate, the complication rate, and the time to access. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03860090.

Outcomes of a Polytetrafluoroethylene Hybrid Vascular Graft with Preloaded Nitinol Stent at the Venous Outflow for Dialysis Vascular Access.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcomes and patency of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) created using Gore hybrid vascular grafts in hemodialysis patients with limited venous outflow or challenging anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in two academic centers of all patients between July 2013 and December 2016 who underwent surgical AVG creation using a Gore hybrid vascular graft in a brachial artery to axillary configuration. Patient characteristics and comorbidities as well as graft patency, function, and subsequent need for percutaneous interventions were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients including 30 females (65.2%) and 16 males (34.8%) with a mean age of 63 ± 13 years were identified. The most common indications for a hybrid vascular graft were limited surgical accessibility and/or revision of existing AVG due to severe stenotic lesions at the venous outflow in 33 patients (72%). One-year primary unassisted and assisted patency rates were 44 ± 8% and 54 ± 8%, respectively, compared with 1-year secondary patency rate of 66 ± 8%. The rate of percutaneous interventions to maintain graft function and patency was approximately one intervention per graft per year. CONCLUSIONS: Access created with the hybrid vascular graft in a brachial-axillary (brachial artery to axillary vein) configuration is an acceptable option for patients with limited venous outflow reserve and challenging anatomy. Twelve-month primary and secondary patency rates and need for percutaneous interventions were comparable to traditional AVGs.

Intravascular Ultrasound in Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is a rare disease with no defined guidelines regarding treatment. Patients with first rib resection with anterior scalenectomy (FRRS) often have residual subclavian vein stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the treatment of vTOS patients who have been surgically decompressed with FRRS. METHODS: Patients treated with venography after FRRS for vTOS during 2015-2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they received a venogram with IVUS after FRRS. The axillosubclavian vein at the site of the thoracic outlet was imaged using single-plane venography and IVUS. A greater than 50% diameter stenosis on venography or 50% cross-sectional area reduction on IVUS was considered significant and treated with balloon venoplasty. RESULTS: During the 2-year period, 14 patients underwent 24 upper extremity venograms performed after surgical decompression for vTOS, 18 of which included IVUS. Of the 18 cases with IVUS, 5 (27.8%) stenoses >50% were detected by IVUS, which were not apparent on venography, leading to intervention. IVUS detected a greater degree of stenosis than venography. Seven patients required repeat venograms. Overall, IVUS detected significant venous stenosis in 94.4% of patients compared with 66.7% of patients with venography after FRRS for vTOS. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IVUS detected greater levels of stenosis than venography, leading to more interventions. Just as IVUS being ideal for identifying occult iliac venous lesions, it may have a similar role in identifying venous lesions not evident on single-plane venography for postsurgical decompression in vTOS patients. Further studies may show this technique to increase the number of stenoses identified and improve long-term symptom relief.

Muscle-splitting approach to thoracoacromial vein for superdrainage in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoacromial vein (TAv) is seldomly considered as a secondary outflow recipient option when venous congestion of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is encountered. The purpose of this study was to present a computed tomography (CT)-based anatomy and a method of approaching TAv in performing superdrainage using superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: For CT-based anatomical study, 42 thoracoacromial vessels (TAV) of 21 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction were analyzed. From November 2016 to May 2018, pectoralis major (PM) muscle splitting approach to TAv in the first intercostal space was applied to 7 patients who required superdrainage via SIEV. RESULTS: TAVs at mid-first intercostal space (ICS) were located 83.5 ± 9.8 mm lateral to the sternal border (H), 41.5 ± 12.9 mm below the clavicle (V), and 11.7 ± 3.2 mm deep to the outer surface of PM muscle (D). Mean oblique distances from TAV to internal mammary vessels in the 2nd and 3rd ICS were 75.7 ± 9.7 mm and 98.2 ± 10.9 mm, respectively. Seven DIEP flaps presenting intraoperative venous congestion were successfully salvaged intraoperatively with superdrainge procedure. TAvs were harvested without cutting the PM muscle in any patient. Their mean size at anastomosis was 1.61 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0.9-2.5 mm). All flaps survived without perfusion-related complications including fat necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Harvest of TAv by muscle-splitting approach is an alternative option when additional venous anastomosis using SIEV is mandated for managing venous congestion of DIEP flap.

Contrast venography vs. microwire assisted axillary venipuncture for cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation.

Aims: This study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of microwire assisted technique with contrast venography guided axillary venipuncture in patients undergoing cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Methods and results: This prospective randomized study included 212 consecutive adult patients undergoing CIED implantation at our institute between 2013 and 2015. Patients were randomized to either venography guided technique (Group I; n = 105) or microwire assisted technique (Group II; n = 107) for axillary venipuncture. In Group I axillary venogram was used as a roadmap for guiding the puncture. In Group II, a 0.014 inch hydrophilic coronary guidewire ('microwire') was introduced through the ipsilateral antecubital vein and puncture needle was aimed to hit the microwire over the first or second rib. Outcome measures including technical success rates; number of attempts to successful puncture; puncture duration; fluoroscopy times and adverse events were compared in the two groups. Overall success rates were similar in both groups (97.4% in Group I and 100% in Group II, P = 0.061). We demonstrated significantly higher first attempt success rates; shorter puncture durations and fluoroscopy times; and lower number of attempts to successful puncture with microwire assisted technique (89.3% vs. 65.6%; 36.7 ± 23.1 s vs. 67.8 ± 44.9 s; 62.4 ± 35.3 s vs. 118.9 ± 63.2 s; and 1.21 ± 0.82 vs. 2.16 ± 1.54 respectively, P < 0.001). Adverse event rates were significantly lower with microwire assisted technique (0.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.009). Conclusion: Microwire assisted technique is a simple, quicker, safer and more efficacious alternative to contrast venography guided axillary venipuncture.