A case of Vp4 hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis extending into the confluence of the splenic/portal vein achieved a good prognosis with emergent hepatectomy and postoperative adjuvant therapy with lenvatinib.

In this report, we describe a case of highly advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis extending into the main portal vein of the pancreas that was successfully treated with adjuvant lenvatinib after right hepatic resection with thrombectomy. A 70-year-old woman was referred from the clinic because of elevated hepatobiliary enzymes. The patient was positive for the hepatitis B virus antigen at our hospital. The tumor markers were highly elevated with alpha-fetoprotein (14.5 U/mL) and protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKAII) (1545 ng/mL), suggesting hepatocellular carcinoma. Dynamic abdominal computed tomography showed an early enhanced tumor approximately 6 cm in size and portal vein tumor thrombosis filling the main portal vein, but not extending into the splenic or superior mesenteric vein (SMV). On magnetic resonance imaging 1 week after CT, portal vein tumor thrombosis had extended to the confluence of the splenic vein with the SMV, indicating rapid tumor growth. Thus, we performed emergent right hepatectomy with tumor thrombectomy. Postoperatively, we treated the patient with lenvatinib for a tumor reduction surgery. Fortunately, the patient was alive 2 years postoperatively without recurrence. This case report suggests that a favorable outcome may be achieved with multidisciplinary treatment including resection and postoperative treatment with lenvatinib.

Radiological tumour invasion of splenic artery or vein in patients with pancreatic body or tail adenocarcinoma and effect on recurrence and survival.

BACKGROUND: Major vessel invasion is an important factor for determining the surgical approach and long-term prognosis for patients with pancreatic head cancer. However, clinical implications of vessel invasion have seldom been reported in pancreatic body or tail cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of splenic vessel invasion with pancreatic body or tail cancer compared with no invasion and investigate prognostic factors. METHODS: This study enrolled patients who underwent upfront distal pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2018. The circular degree of splenic vessel invasion was investigated and categorized into three groups (group 1, no invasion; group 2, 0-180°; group 3, 180° or more). Clinicopathological variables and perioperative and survival outcomes were evaluated, and multivariable Cox proportional analysis was performed to evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 249 enrolled patients, tumour size was larger in patients with splenic vessel invasion (3.9 versus 2.9 cm, P = 0.001), but the number of metastatic lymph nodes was comparable to that in patients with no vessel invasion (1.7 versus 1.4, P = 0.241). The 5-year overall survival rates differed significantly between the three groups (group 1, 38.4 per cent; group 2, 16.8 per cent; group 3, 9.7 per cent, P < 0.001). Patients with both splenic artery and vein invasion had lower 5-year overall survival rates than those with one vessel (7.5 versus 20.2 per cent, P = 0.021). Cox proportional analysis revealed adjuvant treatment, R0 resection and splenic artery invasion as independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in pancreatic body or tail cancer. CONCLUSION: Splenic vessel invasion was associated with higher recurrence and lower overall survival in pancreatic body or tail cancers suggesting a need for a neoadjuvant approach.

Paneled Saphenous Vein Grafts Compared to Internal Jugular Vein Grafts in Venous Reconstruction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for the excision of pancreatic cancer allows for a more complete resection with negative margins, which increases survival. When the resected vein is greater than 3 cm, reconstruction with an interposition graft is recommended. However, consensus regarding the optimal venous conduit has not been reached. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes between the paneled saphenous vein graft (SVG) and internal jugular vein graft (IJVG) in portomesenteric venous reconstructions after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy requiring an interposition graft for venous reconstruction between 2011 and 2019. Patients were stratified based on the type of conduit used (paneled SVG or IJVG). Preoperative patient characteristics, reconstruction details, and postoperative outcomes including graft patency were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 18 patients met inclusion criteria (10 female, mean age: 63 years, age range: 41-82 years). Thirteen patients underwent reconstruction with paneled SVG and five with IJVG. Comparing SVG and IJVG groups, there were no significant differences in venous resection length, venous diameters at the resection margins, or splenic vein ligation rate. For the paneled SVG, the average length of harvested vein was 168 mm which rendered 3-paneled grafts with an average diameter of 12 mm. The time to complete the venous reconstructions did not differ between the two groups (SVG: 263+/-204 min, IJVG: 216+/-77 min, P = 0.63). There were five graft thrombosis, three in the SVG group (mean follow-up time of 17 months) and two in the IJVG group (mean follow-up time of 8 months). All but one of the graft thromboses occurred during the index hospitalization. There was one donor site seroma and wound dehiscence in the SVG group and none in the IJVG group. Hospital length of stay was longer for the IJVG group (IJVG: 15.2 days, SVG: 10.2 days, P = 0.03). However, in-hospital and late mortality did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Paneled SVG and IJVG are both versatile and durable conduits for venous reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy, able to accommodate a wide range of venous defects. In this small series, SVG has comparable outcomes to IJVG. Paneled SVG is a suitable alternative to IJVG for portomesenteric reconstruction.

An outcome analysis of predictive factors for portal or splenic vein thrombosis after distal pancreatectomy.

PURPOSES: The aim of this study was to explore predictive factors for portal or splenic vein thrombosis (VT) that might cause serious problems after distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS: A total of 230 patients who underwent DP between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to identify predictive factors for portal or splenic VT. RESULTS: Ultimately, 164 patients were analyzed. Portal or splenic VT was significantly correlated with age < 65 years old, benign tumor, laparoscopic surgery, preservation of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and left gastric vein (LGV), preservation of the IMV only, no drainage vein, length of the residual splenic vein (RSV) ≥ 26 mm, vessel dissection with a linear stapler, and intra-abdominal abscess (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, a multivariate analysis indicated that the length of the RSV (odds ratio [OR]: 9.15, P = 0.03) was an independent predictive factor for portal VT and that the length of the RSV (OR: 37.9, P < 0.01), vessel dissection with a linear stapler (OR: 6.49, P = 0.03), and intra-abdominal abscess (OR: 23.0, P = 0.02) were independent predictive factors for splenic VT. CONCLUSION: As the length of the RSV was significantly associated with portal or splenic VT, a follow-up imaging diagnosis might be recommended for such cases.

Splenic vein thrombosis: rare cause of abdominal pain.

-An 83-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, diabetes and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation anticoagulated with acenocoumarol was brought to the emergency department due to dyspnoea. At admission, the patient reported a 1-week history of malaise, shortness of breath and non-productive cough. She denied fever but reported pain on the left flank. On examination, auscultation showed arrhythmic tones and crackles in the left lower lung field. Laboratory findings showed leucocytosis of 15.32×103/µL, and the C reactive protein was 177 mg/L. The activated partial thromboplastin time was 54.8 s, and the international normalised ratio was 7.09. A chest X-ray showed left lower lobe consolidation with pleural effusion. Point-of-care ultrasound was performed using a low-frequency curved transducer (2-5 MHz). The probe was placed in the left posterior axillary showing a pulmonary consolidation, but also a hypoechoic lesion in the spleen was found (figure 1).emermed;37/1/30/F1F1F1Figure 1Ultrasound image of the spleen in longitudinal section demonstrating a large, hypoechoic, wedge-shaped lesion. QUESTION: What is the most likely diagnosis?Splenic abscessSubcapsular splenic haematomaSplenic infarctionSplenic hydatid cyst For answer see page 2.

Venous thrombosis in unusual sites: A practical review for the hematologist.

Thrombosis of unusual venous sites encompasses a large part of consultative hematology and is encountered routinely by practicing hematologists. Contrary to the more commonly encountered lower extremity venous thrombosis and common cardiovascular disorders, the various thromboses outlined in this review have unique presentations, pathophysiology, workup, and treatments that all hematologists should be aware of. This review attempts to outline the most up to date literature on cerebral, retinal, upper extremity, hepatic, portal, splenic, mesenteric, and renal vein thrombosis, focusing on the incidence, pathophysiology, provoking factors, and current recommended treatments for each type of unusual thrombosis to provide a useful and practical review for the hematologist.

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for pediatric bleeding esophageal varices complicated by gastric vein, main portal vein, splenic mesenteric junction, and splenic vein occlusion: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is a life-saving procedure for pediatric patients with bleeding gastric varices (GV) associated with advanced liver cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Because of the lack of an endoscopic banding ligation device for pediatric patients, EIS is usually performed for bleeding esophageal varices (EV) in infants with congenital biliary atresia. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 15-month-old female infant with type I biliary atresia with jaundice (total serum bilirubin, 22.2 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin level, 2.58 g/dL), coagulopathy (prothrombin time > 20 s compared with that of a normal control), ascites, splenomegaly, portal hypertension (portal vein velocity, 3.9-5.6 cm/sec of hepatopetal flow), and repeated bleeding of the varices after receiving three doses of intravascularly administered Histoacryl 1 ampoule mixed with Lipiodol UF 8 mL in the EV. Prominent GV and EV were occluded by EIS. The sclerosing agent was also present in the main portal vein, splenic mesenteric junction, and splenic vein, causing an engorged inferior mesenteric vein. The patient underwent total hepatectomy and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) by left lateral segment graft (segments 2, 3, and 4 of the middle hepatic vein trunk) and left portal vein graft to the recipient inferior mesenteric vein anastomosis. Portal vein stent placement via segment 4 of the portal vein stump was performed from the inferior mesenteric vein to the umbilical portion of the left portal vein. The patient is still alive and doing well after the LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: EIS is a life-saving procedure in cases involving bleeding EV complicated by gastric, main portal vein, splenic mesenteric junction, and splenic vein occlusions; hence, it should be kept in mind as a treatment for EV complications in pediatric patients.

Pathological and Radiological Splenic Vein Involvement are Predictors of Poor Prognosis and Early Liver Metastasis After Surgery in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma of the Body and Tail.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) invasion to the splenic vessel is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of pathological and radiological splenic vessel invasion in PDACs of the body and tail. METHODS: Medical records of patients with resectable PDAC of the body and tail who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2003 and 2016 at the Kobe University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 68 patients (29 female and 39 male patients) were enrolled. Pathologically determined splenic vein invasion (p-SV) and splenic artery invasion (p-SA) were identified in 21 (30.9%) and 5 (7.4%) patients, respectively. The p-SV (but not p-SA) was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). On analysis of recurrence patterns, patients with PDAC positive for p-SV were at a higher risk for liver metastasis (p = 0.022); however, the associations were not significant for other recurrence patterns. Liver metastasis occurred earlier in patients who were positive for p-SV (p = 0.015). Preoperative computed tomography effectively diagnosed pathological vessel invasion (SV: sensitivity, 95.2%, specificity, 72.3%; SA: sensitivity, 100%, specificity, 84.1%). Radiological SV invasion remained significant in multivariate analysis regarding postoperative survival (p = 0.007), and was also associated with early liver metastases (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Pathological/radiological SV invasion were independent adverse prognostic factors associated with early liver metastasis in patients with PDAC of the body/tail. Assessment of these findings may be useful in determining optimal therapeutic options in these patients.

Predictors of portal and splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy: a retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard operative approach for splenectomy. Portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) is a serious and common complication after LS, and lethal complications of PSVT can occur when the portal vein is completely occluded by portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We aimed to clarify the predictors of PSVT after LS and to determine which of them were also predictors of PVT. METHODS: A total of 56 consecutive patients who underwent elective LS were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of PSVT after LS. In addition, patients with PSVT were divided into two groups: a PVT group and a non-PVT group. The preoperative and intraoperative clinical data were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Thirty (53.6%) patients developed PSVT. The splenic vein diameter was the most useful predictor for the development of PSVT, and 10 mm was an accurate splenic vein diameter cut-off value for use as a predictive factor for PSVT. In addition, the splenic vein diameter was the most useful predictor of the development of PVT from splenic vein thrombosis (SVT), and 14 mm was found to be an accurate cut-off value. CONCLUSION: PSVT is a common postoperative complication that is identified on enhanced computed tomography. The splenic vein diameter is not only a predictor of PSVT but also of the development of PVT from SVT.

[Cavernoma complicated with biliopatia secondary to type 1 Gaucher disease: report of a Peruvian case]. / Cavernoma portal complicada con biliopatía secundario a enfermedad de Gaucher tipo 1: reporte de un caso peruano.

Gaucher disease is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder characterized by deficiency of beta-glucosidase that would lead to the accumulation of glucosylceramide mainly in cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system causing systemic effectations. We present a patient of twenty years who is suffering from chronic pain in the left hypochondrium with episodes of bleeding for 3 years and sensation of thermal rise, physical examination revealed jaundice and massive splenomegaly, without neurological involvement. Severe osteoporosis, pancytopenia, and the presence of portal vein thrombosis with cavernomatous transformation complicated by portal biliopathy simulating a klatskin tumor, marrow and enzymatic studies were compatible with Gaucher disease, were shown as unexpected findings. he received treatment with imiglucerase, following up. It is a rare case, of great interest, heterogeneity in its clinical manifestations and unpublished by its complication, constituting a challenge to reach its diagnosis of this orphan disease.

Splenic Vein Thrombosis Following Pancreas Transplantation: Identification of Factors That Support Conservative Management.

Prophylaxis for graft portal/splenic venous thrombosis following pancreas transplant varies between institutions. Similarly, treatment of venous thrombosis ranges from early re-exploration to conservative management with anticoagulation. We wished to determine the prevalence of graft splenic vein (SV) thrombosis, as well as the clinical significance of non-occlusive thrombus observed on routine imaging. Records of 112 pancreas transplant recipients over a 5-year period at a single center were reviewed. Venous thrombosis was defined as absence of flow or presence of thrombus identified in any part of the graft SV on ultrasound. Thirty patients (27%) had some degree of thrombus or absence of flow in the SV on postoperative ultrasound. There were 5 graft losses in this group. Four were due to venous thrombosis, and occurred within 20 days of transplant. All patients with non-occlusive partial SV thrombus but normal arterial signal on Doppler ultrasound were successfully treated with IV heparin followed by warfarin for 3-6 months, and remained insulin independent. Findings of arterial signal abnormalities, such as absence or reversal of diastolic flow within the graft, require urgent operative intervention since this finding can be associated with more extensive thrombus that may lead to graft loss.

How I treat splanchnic vein thrombosis.

Antithrombotic treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a clinical challenge. Depending on the site of thrombosis, patients are at risk of developing liver insufficiency, portal hypertension, or bowel infarction and may experience recurrence in both the splanchnic veins and other vein segments. To prevent recurrence, anticoagulant therapy should be started as soon as possible after diagnosis and is often continued for an indefinite period of time. However, active bleeding is not infrequent at the time of SVT diagnosis, and major risk factors for bleeding, such as esophageal varices or a low platelet count, are frequently present in these patients. In real-world clinical practice, a proportion of SVT patients are left untreated because the risks associated with anticoagulant therapy are felt to exceed its benefits. However, the majority of patients receive anticoagulant drugs, with heterogeneous timing of initiation, drug choice, and dosages. Evidence to drive treatment decisions is limited because no randomized controlled trials have been carried out in these patients. This review provides practical guidance for the use of anticoagulant drugs in patients presenting with SVT, including symptomatic as well as incidentally detected events.

Screening for thrombophilia does not identify patients at risk of portal or splenic vein thrombosis following laparoscopic splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Portal and/or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) is a potentially lethal complication of splenectomy for hematologic disease. Known risk factors for PSVT include malignancy and splenomegaly. While these patients are believed to be hypercoagulable, the specific mechanism is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether specific acquired prothrombotic risk factors contribute to the development of PSVT following laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing LS were prospectively studied between 2005 and 2013. Preoperatively, patients were screened for prothrombotic states and surveillance duplex ultrasonography was performed between 1 week and 1 month postoperatively to assess for PSVT. The association between baseline prothrombotic disorders and PSVT was explored using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis, and 17 (25 %) of these developed PSVT. There were no differences in patients with and without PSVT with respect to age, body mass index, gender or surgical time. Preoperative spleen size, as determined by diagnostic imaging, and intraoperative blood transfusion were associated with PSVT. Seven of 9 patients (78 %) with massive splenomegaly (>20 cm) developed PSVT compared with 4 of 13 patients (31 %) with moderate splenomegaly (15-20 cm) and 6 of 45 patients (13 %) without (p < 0.001). Abnormalities in baseline prothrombotic screening tests were common, with 52 patients (75 %) demonstrating at least one; however, none were associated with the development of PSVT. CONCLUSION: In patients scheduled for LS, screening for prothrombotic states is not useful to identify patients at risk of development of PSVT. Preoperative spleen size and blood transfusion were predictive of PSVT formation.

[Thrombosis of the portal, upper mesenteric, and splenic veins in a patient with thrombophilia (a clinical case report)]. / Tromboz vorotnoi, verkhnei bryzheechnoi i selezenochnoi ven u bol'nogo s trombofiliei.

Currently there are several dozens of hereditarily associated thrombophilias and acquired states known to condition the development of a thrombus. Thrombosis of visceral veins appears to be a considerably less often encountered event than thrombosis in the system of visceral arteries. Presented herein in the article is a clinical case report concerning subacute thrombosis of the portal, upper mesenteric and splenic veins, having developed on the background of mutations of 7 genes of the system of haemostasis in a young adult patient. Timely comprehensive examination with determining polymorphism of the haemostasis system genes made it possible to verify the aetiology of the disease in the patient, while multispiral computed tomography contributed favourably to specifying the extension of thrombosis. Due to the developed segmental necrosis of the small intestine the patient was subjected to resection of the necrotised portion of the small intestine followed by establishing an entero-enteric anastomosis. In the postoperative period adequate anticoagulant therapy was adjusted in order to prevent relapse of thrombogenesis.

Reconsideration about the aggressive surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: a focus on real pathological portosplenomesenteric venous invasion.

BACKGROUND: Some clinicians have argued that combining pancreatic and portomesenteric venous resection could improve the rates of long-term survival. However, whether resection of the portosplenomesenteric vein could provide an acceptable survival benefit to patients with pancreatic cancer involving the portosplenomesenteric system remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of pathological portosplenomesenteric venous invasion on survival in patients who underwent surgical management for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgical treatment were divided into two subgroups: those with pathological invasion to the portosplenomesenteric vein (PV-positive group) and those without invasion (PV-negative group). RESULTS: Of 160 studied patients, the median overall survival was 48.0 months after pancreatic surgery in the PV-negative group and 18.0 months in the PV-positive group. The incidence of postoperative peritoneal dissemination was significantly lower in the PV-negative group than in the PV-positive group. Accordingly, patients in the PV-negative group showed a cumulative rate of pancreatic cancer recurrence at 2 years after pancreatic surgery of 54.4%, while this rate was 89.4% in the PV-positive group. Finally, an elevated presurgical serum CA19-9 level (>700 IU/mL) was found to be significantly associated with a poor outcome after surgery in pancreatic cancer patients with pathological portosplenomesenteric venous invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer carries a high risk of recurrence even if surgical resection is technically possible. The current study suggested that portosplenomesenteric involvement and preoperative high serum CA19-9 are poor prognostic indications; however, the findings provided little insight into the role of neoadjuvant therapy in such patients.

[Analysis and computational fluid dynamics simulation of hemodynamic influences caused by splenic vein thrombosis].

This paper aims to analyze the impact of splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) on the hemodynamic parameters in hepatic portal vein system. Based on computed tomography (CT) images of a patient with portal hypertension and commercial software MIMICS, the patient's portal venous system model was reconstructed. Color Doppler ultrasound method was used to measure the blood flow velocity in portal vein system and then the blood flow velocities were used as the inlet boundary conditions of simulation. By using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, we simulated the changes of hemodynamic parameters in portal venous system with and without splenic vein thrombosis and analyzed the influence of physiological processes. The simulation results reproduced the blood flow process in portal venous system and the results showed that the splenic vein thrombosis caused serious impacts on hemodynamics. When blood flowed through the thrombosis, blood pressure reduced, flow velocity and wall shear stress increased. Flow resistance increased, blood flow velocity slowed down, the pressure gradient and wall shear stress distribution were more uniform in portal vein. The blood supply to liver decreased. Splenic vein thrombosis led to the possibility of forming new thrombosis in portal vein and surroundings.

Portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis is associated with pancreatic necrosis and usually has a benign course.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although there are some data on prevalence of portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis (PSMVT) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), the progression of PSMVT in patients who have and have not received anticoagulants has not been studied systematically. We evaluated the prevalence and natural history of PSMVT in a well-defined cohort of individuals with AP. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we analyzed data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center on 162 patients with a sentinel attack of AP from 2003-2010. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentation, etiology, clinical course, and outcomes. One hundred twenty-two patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography; the scans were reviewed to identify thromboses and/or narrowing of splanchnic veins (splenic, superior mesenteric, and portal). RESULTS: PSMVT was detected in 22 patients overall (14%; 18% among patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography). Median time to detection of PSMVT was 17 days (interquartile range, 11-40 days). PSMVT formed most frequently in the splenic vein (19 of 22, 86%), followed by portal (8 of 22, 36%) and superior mesenteric (6/22, 27%) veins. Development of PSMVT was associated with presence (21 of 22, 95%), location, and extent of pancreatic necrosis. Fifty-three percent of patients (21 of 40) with necrosis developed PSMVT. Anticoagulants were administered infrequently (6 of 22, 27%) and always for indications unrelated to PSMVT. Most patients with PSMVT developed collateral veins (19 of 22, 86%), and 27% (6 of 22) were found to have varices during endoscopic evaluation, but clot resolution was infrequent (2 of 22, 9%). No patient developed complications directly related to PSMVT. CONCLUSIONS: PSMVT develops in about half of patients with necrotizing AP and is rare in the absence of necrosis. Despite infrequent administration of anticoagulants, complications directly related to PSMVT are rare.