Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo, Paolo; Mutinelli, Sabrina.
Affiliation
  • Vigolo P; Department of Clinical Odontostomatology, University of Padova, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Padova, Italy. paolovigolo@virgilio.it
J Prosthodont ; 21(4): 265-9, 2012 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22339945
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to determine the success rate of single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia copings generated with two CAD/CAM systems, compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) single-unit posterior FDPs after 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

From 2005 to 2006, 60 patients who needed a single-unit FDP on a first molar in the mandibular jaw (left or right) in a private office setting were included in this study. The 60 first mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) in the control group (group C), 20 PFM FDPs were included. In the other two groups CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of the zirconium-oxide copings 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Procera system (group P, Nobel Biocare); 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Lava system (group L, 3M ESPE). For the ANOVA follow-up data, the clinical life table method was applied. The statistical analysis was performed using two nonparametric tests, the log-rank test for k-groups and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS:

No statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) evaluated together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function; however, clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups. The difference in the frequency of failure was statistically significant only in the comparison of groups C and P.

CONCLUSIONS:

Even if no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) considered together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function, clinical data showed that the two zirconia-ceramic FDP groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems for this reason all the clinical and technical variables related to the use of zirconia-ceramic FDPs generated with CAD/CAM systems should be carefully considered prior to all treatment procedures.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Zirconium / Metal Ceramic Alloys / Dental Prosthesis Design / Computer-Aided Design / Crowns / Dental Porcelain Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2012 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Zirconium / Metal Ceramic Alloys / Dental Prosthesis Design / Computer-Aided Design / Crowns / Dental Porcelain Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2012 Type: Article