Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Universal newborn hearing screening : Definition of uniform parameters by the Association of German Hearing Screening Centers as a requirement for nationwide evaluation with valid results]. / Universelles Neugeborenen-Hörscreening : Definition einheitlicher Parameter durch den Verband Deutscher Hörscreening-Zentralen (VDHZ) als Voraussetzung für eine flächendeckende Evaluation mit validen Ergebnissen.
Brockow, I; Praetorius, M; Neumann, K; am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, A; Mohnike, K; Matulat, P; Rohlfs, K; Lang-Roth, R; Gross, M; Duphorn, E; Meuret, S; Seidel, A; Schönfeld, R; Schönweiler, R; Dienlin, S; Rissmann, A; Friedrich, I; Lehnert, B; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.
Affiliation
  • Brockow I; Screeningzentrum, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Veterinärstr. 2, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Deutschland, Inken.brockow@lgl.bayern.de.
HNO ; 62(3): 165-70, 2014 Mar.
Article in De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24610085
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Since 2009, all newborns in Germany have been entitled to universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS). UNHS with tracking of test results leads to earlier detection of hearing disorders. The Association of German Hearing Screening Centers (Verband Deutscher Hörscreening-Zentralen, VDHZ) was founded to promote nationwide tracking, validity and quality control of UNHS results.

OBJECTIVES:

A comparable data structure in the different screening centers, with uniform definitions of primary parameters is essential for the nationwide evaluation of UNHS results. To address the question of whether a data structure with comparable definitions already exists or still has to be created, the existing structures and primary parameter definitions in the hearing screening centers should be investigated and compared.

METHODS:

A survey was conducted in all hearing screening centers to assess how data on the primary UNHS parameters defined in pediatric guidelines was gathered. In the case of discrepancies, uniform definitions were created. Finally, the practicability of these definitions was evaluated.

RESULTS:

Due to differing definitions of primary parameters, some of the data were not comparable between the individual centers. Therefore, uniform definitions were created in a consensus process. In the centers, the screening method, the two-step first screening and the result of the first screening now correspond to these uniform definitions. Other parameters, e.g. the total number of newborns, still vary widely, rendering the comparison of screening rates almost impossible.

CONCLUSION:

Valid evaluation of UNHS not only requires nationwide establishment of hearing screening centers, but also unified data structures and parameter definitions.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Neonatal Screening / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Hearing Disorders / Hearing Tests / Terminology as Topic Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: De Year: 2014 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Neonatal Screening / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Hearing Disorders / Hearing Tests / Terminology as Topic Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: De Year: 2014 Type: Article