Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of myocardial infarct size with body surface potential mapping: validation against contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Kylmälä, Minna M; Konttila, Teijo; Vesterinen, Paula; Kivistö, Sari M; Lauerma, Kirsi; Lindholm, Mats; Väänänen, Heikki; Stenroos, Matti; Nieminen, Markku S; Hänninen, Helena; Toivonen, Lauri.
Affiliation
  • Kylmälä MM; Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Konttila T; BioMag Laboratory, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Vesterinen P; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Kivistö SM; Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lauerma K; BioMag Laboratory, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lindholm M; Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Väänänen H; Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Stenroos M; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Nieminen MS; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Hänninen H; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Toivonen L; Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 20(3): 240-52, 2015 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25234825
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Assessment of myocardial infarct (MI) size is important for therapeutic and prognostic reasons. We used body surface potential mapping (BSPM) to evaluate whether single-lead electrocardiographic variables can assess MI size.

METHODS:

We performed BSPM with 120 leads covering the front and back chest (plus limb leads) on 57 patients at different phases of MI acutely, during healing, and in the chronic phase. Final MI size was determined by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) and correlated with various computed depolarization- and repolarization-phase BSPM variables. We also calculated correlations between BSPM variables and enzymatic MI size (peak CK-MBm).

RESULTS:

BSPM variables reflecting the Q- and R wave showed strong correlations with MI size at all stages of MI. R width performed the best, showing its strongest correlation with MI size on the upper right back, there representing the width of the "reciprocal Q wave" (r = 0.64-0.71 for DE-CMR, r = 0.57-0.64 for CK-MBm, P < 0.0001). Repolarization-phase variables showed only weak correlations with MI size in the acute phase, but these correlations improved during MI healing. T-wave variables and the QRSSTT integral showed their best correlations with DE-CMR defined MI size on the precordial area, at best r = -0.57, P < 0.0001 in the chronic phase. The best performing BSPM variables could differentiate between large and small infarcts at all stages of MI.

CONCLUSIONS:

Computed, single-lead electrocardiographic variables can estimate the final infarct size at all stages of MI, and differentiate large infarcts from small.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Body Surface Potential Mapping / Contrast Media / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2015 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Body Surface Potential Mapping / Contrast Media / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2015 Type: Article