Is 3D technique superior to 2D in Down syndrome screening? Evaluation of six second and third trimester fetal profile markers.

Vos, F I; Bakker, M; de Jong-Pleij, E A P; Ribbert, L S M; Tromp, E; Bilardo, C M

Vos, F I; Bakker, M; de Jong-Pleij, E A P; Ribbert, L S M; Tromp, E; Bilardo, C M.

Affiliation

Vos FI; Fetal Medicine Unit, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Prenat Diagn ; 35(3): 207-13, 2015 Mar.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25346246

Subject(s)

Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging; Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging; Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods; Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods; Case-Control Studies; Down Syndrome/diagnosis; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Down Syndrome / Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Facial Bones Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Year: 2015 Type: Article

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google