Accuracy of herdsmen reporting versus serologic testing for estimating foot-and-mouth disease prevalence.

Morgan, Kenton L; Handel, Ian G; Tanya, Vincent N; Hamman, Saidou M; Nfon, Charles; Bergman, Ingrid E; Malirat, Viviana; Sorensen, Karl J; de C Bronsvoort, Barend M

Morgan, Kenton L; Handel, Ian G; Tanya, Vincent N; Hamman, Saidou M; Nfon, Charles; Bergman, Ingrid E; Malirat, Viviana; Sorensen, Karl J; de C Bronsvoort, Barend M.

Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(12): 2048-54, 2014 Dec.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25417556

Subject(s)

Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus; Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis; Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology; Neutralization Tests/methods; Neutralization Tests/standards; Animals; Cattle; Cattle Diseases/diagnosis; Cattle Diseases/epidemiology; Cattle Diseases/virology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/immunology; Prevalence; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Neutralization Tests / Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus / Foot-and-Mouth Disease Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Year: 2014 Type: Article

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google