Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors.
van Donkelaar, Aaron; Martin, Randall V; Brauer, Michael; Hsu, N Christina; Kahn, Ralph A; Levy, Robert C; Lyapustin, Alexei; Sayer, Andrew M; Winker, David M.
Affiliation
  • van Donkelaar A; Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University , Halifax, N.S. Canada.
  • Martin RV; Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University , Halifax, N.S. Canada.
  • Brauer M; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.
  • Hsu NC; School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia , 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada.
  • Kahn RA; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States.
  • Levy RC; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States.
  • Lyapustin A; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States.
  • Sayer AM; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States.
  • Winker DM; Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research, Universities Space Research Association , Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 50(7): 3762-72, 2016 Apr 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26953851
ABSTRACT
We estimated global fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations using information from satellite-, simulation- and monitor-based sources by applying a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to global geophysically based satellite-derived PM2.5 estimates. Aerosol optical depth from multiple satellite products (MISR, MODIS Dark Target, MODIS and SeaWiFS Deep Blue, and MODIS MAIAC) was combined with simulation (GEOS-Chem) based upon their relative uncertainties as determined using ground-based sun photometer (AERONET) observations for 1998-2014. The GWR predictors included simulated aerosol composition and land use information. The resultant PM2.5 estimates were highly consistent (R(2) = 0.81) with out-of-sample cross-validated PM2.5 concentrations from monitors. The global population-weighted annual average PM2.5 concentrations were 3-fold higher than the 10 µg/m(3) WHO guideline, driven by exposures in Asian and African regions. Estimates in regions with high contributions from mineral dust were associated with higher uncertainty, resulting from both sparse ground-based monitoring, and challenging conditions for retrieval and simulation. This approach demonstrates that the addition of even sparse ground-based measurements to more globally continuous PM2.5 data sources can yield valuable improvements to PM2.5 characterization on a global scale.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Environmental Monitoring / Particulate Matter / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Environmental Monitoring / Particulate Matter / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article