Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification and Rating of Gynecologic Oncology Applications Using the APPLICATIONS Scoring System.
Farag, Sara; Fields, Jessica; Pereira, Elena; Chyjek, Kathy; Chen, Katherine T.
Affiliation
  • Farag S; 1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
  • Fields J; 1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
  • Pereira E; 2 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
  • Chyjek K; 1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
  • Chen KT; 1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
Telemed J E Health ; 22(12): 1001-1007, 2016 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27187576
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, there are thousands of medical applications (apps) on the market potentially leading to app overload. Finding useful and accurate apps may be time-consuming and frustrating to gynecologic oncologists.

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study is to identify and rate gynecologic oncology (gyn-onc) apps using the APPLICATIONS scoring system. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A list of nonconsumer gyn-onc apps was identified from the Apple iTunes and Google Play Stores. Based on reliable references, inaccurate apps were excluded. The remaining apps were rated with the APPLICATIONS scoring system, which uses both objective and subjective measures.

RESULTS:

Of 748 apps identified, 11 (1.5%) were found to be both useful and accurate to gyn-onc providers. The apps with the lowest scores were calculator apps, while those with the highest scores were informational apps.

DISCUSSION:

We found useful and accurate calculator, screening, staging, and informational apps. However, a large number of the apps found were considered inaccurate or non-gyn-onc specific.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our systematic method for identifying and rating apps with the APPLICATIONS scoring system can be applied within other subspecialties of obstetrics and gynecology and other specialties of medicine to offer providers with apps in clinical care.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Mobile Applications / Genital Neoplasms, Female Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Mobile Applications / Genital Neoplasms, Female Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article