Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Similar HbA1c reduction and hypoglycaemia with variable- vs fixed-time dosing of basal insulin peglispro in type 1 diabetes: IMAGINE 7 study.
Garg, S; Selam, J-L; Bhargava, A; Schloot, N; Luo, J; Zhang, Q; Jacobson, J G; Hoogwerf, B J.
Affiliation
  • Garg S; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora.
  • Selam JL; Diabetes Research Center, Tustin, California.
  • Bhargava A; Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center, Des Moines, Iowa.
  • Schloot N; Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
  • Luo J; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Zhang Q; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Jacobson JG; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Hoogwerf BJ; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana. hoogwerf_byron_james@lilly.com.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 18 Suppl 2: 43-49, 2016 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27393722
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To compare 24-hour fixed-time basal insulin peglispro (BIL) dosing with 8- to 40-hour variable-time BIL dosing for glycaemic control and safety in patients with type 1 diabetes. Primary outcome was non-inferiority of BIL variable-time dosing compared with fixed-time dosing for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change after 12-week treatment (margin = 0.4%). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This Phase 3, open-label, randomized, cross-over study (N = 212) was conducted at 20 centres in the United States. During the 12-week lead-in phase, patients received BIL daily at fixed-times. Two 12-week randomized cross-over treatment phases followed, where patients received BIL dosed at either fixed- or variable-times. During the 4-week safety follow-up, patients received conventional insulins.

RESULTS:

During the lead-in period, least-squares mean HbA1c decreased from 7.5% to 6.8%. For BIL, variable-time dosing was non-inferior to fixed-time dosing for HbA1c change [least-squares mean difference = 0.06%, 95% confidence interval (-0.01, 0.13)]. In both regimens, HbA1c increased slightly during the cross-over periods, but remained significantly below baseline. Variable- and fixed-time dosing regimens had similar rates of total hypoglycaemia (10.4 ± 0.62 and 10.5 ± 0.67 events/patient/30 days, P = .947) and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (1.3 ± 0.11 and 1.5 ± 0.13 events/patient/30days, P = .060). Comparable proportions of patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0% with variable- [91 (54.5%)] and fixed-time dosing [101 (60.5%)].

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with BIL allows patients to use flexible dosing intervals from 8 to 40 hours. Glycaemic efficacy (HbA1c), glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia are similar to fixed-time dosing, suggesting that BIL could potentially provide flexibility in dosing for patients who miss their daily basal insulin.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyethylene Glycols / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Insulin Lispro / Hypoglycemia / Hypoglycemic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyethylene Glycols / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Insulin Lispro / Hypoglycemia / Hypoglycemic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2016 Type: Article