Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review.
Runting, Rebecca K; Bryan, Brett A; Dee, Laura E; Maseyk, Fleur J F; Mandle, Lisa; Hamel, Perrine; Wilson, Kerrie A; Yetka, Kathleen; Possingham, Hugh P; Rhodes, Jonathan R.
Affiliation
  • Runting RK; School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
  • Bryan BA; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
  • Dee LE; CSIRO, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.
  • Maseyk FJ; Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
  • Mandle L; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
  • Hamel P; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
  • Wilson KA; Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
  • Yetka K; Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
  • Possingham HP; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
  • Rhodes JR; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia.
Glob Chang Biol ; 23(1): 28-41, 2017 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27507077
ABSTRACT
Climate change is having a significant impact on ecosystem services and is likely to become increasingly important as this phenomenon intensifies. Future impacts can be difficult to assess as they often involve long timescales, dynamic systems with high uncertainties, and are typically confounded by other drivers of change. Despite a growing literature on climate change impacts on ecosystem services, no quantitative syntheses exist. Hence, we lack an overarching understanding of the impacts of climate change, how they are being assessed, and the extent to which other drivers, uncertainties, and decision making are incorporated. To address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change impacts on ecosystem services at subglobal scales. We found that the impact of climate change on most types of services was predominantly negative (59% negative, 24% mixed, 4% neutral, 13% positive), but varied across services, drivers, and assessment methods. Although uncertainty was usually incorporated, there were substantial gaps in the sources of uncertainty included, along with the methods used to incorporate them. We found that relatively few studies integrated decision making, and even fewer studies aimed to identify solutions that were robust to uncertainty. For management or policy to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services, integrated approaches that incorporate multiple drivers of change and account for multiple sources of uncertainty are needed. This is undoubtedly a challenging task, but ignoring these complexities can result in misleading assessments of the impacts of climate change, suboptimal management outcomes, and the inefficient allocation of resources for climate adaptation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Climate Change / Ecosystem / Conservation of Natural Resources Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Climate Change / Ecosystem / Conservation of Natural Resources Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article